Raj Kapoor Film Comments

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 Raj Kapoor Film Comments

    1/3

    1

    IntroductoryRemarksfortheRajKapoorRetrospectiveSamirDayal,AssociateProfessorofEnglishandMediaStudiesatBentleyUniversity

    RajKapoor(19241988)wasoneoftheleadinglightsofHindicinemaduringitsGoldenAgefromabout1940throughthe1960s. Hewas

    born

    in

    what

    became

    Pakistan

    after

    Indian

    Independence

    and

    Partition

    in

    1947.

    He

    won

    many

    awards,

    including

    nine

    Filmfare

    awards,

    two

    nominationsforthePalmeDOrattheCannesFilmFestival,andoneofIndiashighesthonors,thePadmaBhushan.Hewashonoredwiththe

    DadasahebPhalkeAwardforcontributionstoIndianCinema. SolegendarywashisstatureattheendofhiscareerthattheWikipediaentryon

    Kapooreventodaytellsataleaprocryphalandmelodramatic enoughtomakeaHindifilmdirectorblush:thatWikipediaentrysuggeststhat

    KapoordiedattheverymomentthatthePhalkeawardwasbeingconferredonhimbythePresident!

    Kapoorwasnoisolatedgenius. HecamefromandoccupiedanimportantplaceinthefirstfamilyofIndiancinema,andinthe

    worldslargestfilmindustry. HisfatherwastheeminentPrithvirajKapoor;hissiblingsShashiKapoorandShammiKapoorweremajorfilmstars;

    hischildren,RishiKapoorandRandhirKapoor,andgrandchildrenKarishmaKapoorandKareenaKapoorhavebeensignificantpresencesonthe

    silverscreen.Certainlyhebecameaniconinhisownright. ButbeforethathewasamemberoftheactivistIndianPeoplesTheatreAssociation

    (IPTA),formedin1942,fiveyearsbeforeIndependence. Theatricalinstinctsanddeepideologicalconvictionsdevelopedinhiscollaboration

    withtheIPTAwouldinformallhisworkinthecinema. Althoughhebeganinthemoviesasahumbleclapperboy,Kapoorbecamethe

    paradigmaticauteur. Amajordirectorandheadofhisownstudio(RKFilms),andamegastar,heenjoyedconsiderableartisticfreedom. He

    oversaweverydetailoftheprocessoffilmmaking,includingmusic,forwhichhehadanaturalabilityandtalent. Thistalentremainsunusual

    evenamongdirectorsofIndianfilms,withafewexceptionssuchasthegreatSatyajitRay.

    NotonlydidKapoorhelpdefineIndiancinemasgenericrules,buthealsotestedtheirlimitsinwaysfewdirectorscouldgetaway

    with. InBarsaat(Rain,1949),forexample,therearetwopairedshotsofdifferentwomensensuallycaressingtheirloversfeet,butinboth

    casesthegesturessignifyincomplexwaystheyareneithermerelyeroticnorsimplysubmissive. InotherfilmsKapoorwasevenmore

    provocative,presentingfemaleactorsinveryrevealingcostume,andinonecasenude.Buttheeroticismwasnevergratuitous.Hisfilmswere

    innovativeanddaring,situatedatthecrossroadsbetweenpopularandparallelcinema.Histechnicalachievementsinstaging,music,

    picturizationandhisinterrogationsofreceivedsocialmores,eveninanearlyfilmsuchasAwaara(Vagabond,1951)remaincinematic

    touchstones.WhenhevisitedtheSovietUnionin1954forthereleaseofAwaarathere,KapoorwaslionizedasTavarishBradyaga,orComrade

    Vagabond.His

    films

    were

    popular

    in

    other

    parts

    of

    the

    world

    too,

    including

    the

    Middle

    East,

    Africa

    and

    China;

    Boris

    Yeltsin

    as

    well

    as

    Mao

    Tse

    DongwerereputedtohavebeenabletohummelodiesfromKapoorsfilms.

    Oneofthebenefitsofthisretrospectiveisthatitcanallowustoseecontinuitiesaswellasdevelopments,obsessionsbutalso

    contradictionsinthedirectorsbodyofwork. Bywayofanintroduction,then,Idliketodrawyourattentiontoafewoftheseremarkable

    continuities. OnecouldbeginwithAag(Fire,1948),KapoorsdirectorialdebutfromtheveryfirstyearafterIndianIndependence. The

    metaphorofaagasdesiresfirereappearsinBarsaat.Aagalsointroducedthepersonaoftheunderdogclownortrampthatwouldburgeoninto

    perhapsKapoorscentralmotif,nottomentiontheactualtermawaara,whichwouldbecomethetitleandpivotalthemeofthefilmAwaara

    threeyearslater.

    Inadditiontosuchthematicvectors,continuityisalsothreadedthroughKapoorsfilmsmoresubtly. Forinstance,asongfrom

    Awaarareappears28yearslaterasamelodyplayedbytheweddingbandatRupasweddinginSatyam,ShivamSundaram(1979),creatinga

    musicallinkbetweenfilmswithrelatedclustersofthemes. InMeraNaamJoker(CallMeJoker,1970),oneofthewomenwholovesthe

    protagonistRajuremindshimofanoldsong,againfromAwaara. ButinthisfilmKapooralsogoesastepfurther:inextraordinaryfantasy

    sequences,heinterpolatesactualsnippetsfromhisownearlierfilms,particularlyShree420(Mister420,1955),thusconjuringavisual

    intertextualitywithMeraNaamJoker. Yetthisintertextualityisnotjustadventitious. AlthoughpresentedinMeraNaamJokerthrough

    fantasyinterludes,thesesonganddancesequencescommentonthediegesis,supplementingorembellishingit.

    Indeed,inallKapoorsfilms,thefantasysequencestakenindividuallyareunitsofconsiderableinterest,somequitebrilliant.

    ParticularlyimpressivearethetitlesongsequencesAwaaraHooninAwaaraandMeraJootaHaiJapani,thefamousdittyfromShree420.

    Music,then,andthefantasysequencesmoregenerally,areimportantconnectivethreadsinKapoorsoeuvre.Tracingthesethreadsisnotjust

  • 7/27/2019 Raj Kapoor Film Comments

    2/3

    acinephiliacobsession.Itconnectscommunitiesofordinaryfans,manyofwhomavidlyconsumepopularHindifilmsandsongsasmoveable

    feastsandrelatedpassions. Itisalsoapleasurethatwecanparticipatein,duringthisretrospective.

    OftenthesongsequencesareconsumedasindependentsegmentsassongsandvideoclipsbyHindifilmfans,andaswithmost

    popularfilmsoundtracks,thesongsareplayedindividuallyontheairordistributedlegallyandillegally.Thecreditforthemusicalanddance

    elements,however,mustgolesstothedirectorandmoretosingers,lyricists,setdesignersandchoreographers,includingLataMangeshkar,

    Mukesh,AshaBhonsle,MannaDey,HasratJaipuri,theRussianMadameSimkieandespeciallyShankarJaikishen.

    ButtheartinKapoorsartificeshouldnotbegivenshortshrift. Amonghismostunwaveringcommitmentswastocraft,totheartofcinema.

    Andthesecommitmentsarealsofilamentsofcontinuitythroughouthiscareer. Kapoorsartdirectioncanbeastonishinglyinventive. Oneof

    themostremarkableexamplesoccursinSatyam,Shivam,Sundaram,forwhichhecreatedanentirewaterfallcompletewithrocksandpoolon

    hisownestateinLoni. Thereisalsoatremendousfloodinthefilm,oneofthemostbelievableinIndiancinemainpartbecausetherewasa

    realanddevastatingdelugethatalmostsubmergedtheset. Undeterred,Kapoorinsistedonincorporatingthefloodintothemiseenscne,

    capitalizingonwhattodaysjournalistsmighthavecalledaperfectstormofevents.

    Kapoorsfilmsoftenpromotethesocialvalueofart.InAag,paintingandthetheaterareformsofartattheverycoreofthefilm,

    whichKapoorwantsustoseeasaworkofartaboutart.Barsaat,similarly,foregroundsthepowerofmusic. TheprotagonistPranplaysa

    melodyonhisviolinthatirresistiblydrawsReshmatohim,attheriskofscandal,fromherverytraditionalfathershomeacrossthelake;this

    popularmelodyisalsowhatreunitestheloversafteraforcedseparation. Thoughlighting,costume,andspecialeffectsareimportantin

    Kapoorsdirectorial

    repertoire,

    music

    as

    aform

    of

    art

    enjoys

    pride

    of

    place,

    with

    not

    just

    anarratological

    function

    but

    also

    an

    auratic

    status.

    IfKapoorcanbecalledanartisticauteur,heisequallyadidacticdirector. Hiscinemaisacinemaofideas. Kapoorsearlyblackand

    whiteworkconstitutesanhommagetotheItalianneorealistdirectorVittoriodeSica,andrecallsOrsonWellesandFrankCapra.Severalofhis

    filmsalsoevokeGermanexpressionistcinema,butalsogesturetowardsFellinisLaStrada. Oneofhismostenduringcommitmentswastoa

    socialpedagogyandculturalcommentaryencodedintheveryentertainmenthisfilmsconsciouslypurveyed. Hisfilmspopularityand

    tendencytomelodramaticexcessshouldnotoccludebutratherhighlighttheirtrademarkyokingofthetwocontradictoryambitions,

    entertainmentandpubliceducation. ThiswasadefiningchallengenotonlyforKapoorsfilmsbutalsoforthewholesubcategoryoftheHindi

    social,somethingIhavewrittenaboutelsewhere.ThusKapoorblendsburlesquewithadeepconcernwithissuesofclassandthelegalsystem

    inAwaaraorinBootPolish(1954). Otherfilmsturnedonadenunciationofpoliticalcorruptionandgenderhypocrisy,asinRamTeriGanga

    Maili(Ram,YourGangaisPolluted,1985)whilealsocrammingtheplotwithsonganddanceattractions. Buthismosteffectivevehiclefor

    socialcommentary

    remained

    his

    carefully

    cultivated

    underdog

    persona

    as

    an

    Indian

    Charlie

    Chaplina

    counterpart

    of

    the

    Trickster

    figure

    or

    the

    ShakespeareanFool,anoutsiderwithintheculturewhospeaksthetruththatmightotherwisebeunpalatableordifficulttoexpress. Thismotif

    andfigurewasthedurablelinchpinofKapoorsoeuvre,beginningwiththevagabondorsavageofAwaarabutalsofindingsuccessive

    incarnationsinthemischievousandeponymoustrampofShree420orthetragicclownofMeraNaamJoker. Significantly,MeraNaamJoker,

    whichwasaboxofficeflopwhenfirstreleased,wentontobecomenotonlythemostprofitablefilmofhisstudio,RKFilms:italsoremained

    thedirectorsownfavoritefilm.

    Kapoorisnotsatisfiedjusttocommentonthemundaneandsometimesunpleasantreality. Healsowantstoofferasimulacrumof

    whatiselusiveinthatreality:love,beauty,happiness,andpleasure. ItisthistensionthatanimatesthebrilliantdreamsequenceinAwaara,but

    alsothedramaticconflictofSatyam,Shivam,Sundaram,introducingZeenatAman. Thisbeautifulactressplaystheroleofanunfortunate

    woman,Rupa,whosefaceishorriblydisfiguredbyaburn. Herlover,playedbyShashiKapoor,isconfrontedwithanalmostSocratic,

    phenomenologicalconundrum:howcanawomanbebothblessedwithabeautifulvoiceandcursedwithsuchinauspiciousdeformity,

    evidentlythestigmataofdivinedispleasure? Kapooraskshisviewerstoreexaminetheirreceivedideasofbeautyandfate.1Butthereal

    psychologicalinterestofthisconceitemergeswhen,withakindofperversityHitchcockmighthavesavored,theherodisavowstherealityand

    insistsonsuperimposinghisfantasyonthatreality,hallucinatingaperfectlyformedRupa,whosenamecouldbetranslatedasbeautifulbut

    alsoasform,whilerejectingthedeformedbutrealRupa,whoisalreadyhiswife.

    GivenhiscommitmenttosocialrealismitisnosurprisethatKapoorisobsessedwithclass. ThusinBarsaatKapoorhighlightsclass

    differencestodramatizetheconflictbetweenvillageandcity,thelocalandthecosmopolitan,butalsotheircohabitationinIndianmodernity.

  • 7/27/2019 Raj Kapoor Film Comments

    3/3

    SimilarlyinAwaaraclassstruggleisrefractedasthemainimpedimenttothelovebetweenthemaincharacters;itisalsoananalogforthe

    dialecticaloppositionbetweenindigenousculturalidentityandWesterninfluences.

    MeraNaamJokertooturnsontheproblematicofclassdifference. Rajuisthesonofacircusclownwhoinheritshisfather's

    profession. Playingtheclownhimself, Kapoordeliversasocialcritiqueabouttheliessocietyisfoundedon,andtheliesthatordinaryIndians

    mustlivetostruggleagainstpovertyandhunger.Rajuadmitslyingtogainentryintocircusemployment,andhistestimonyisdeeplymovingto

    theSovietvisitorstothecircus.Heisfoundguiltyofbeinghumane.Wemightsaythat Kapoorsbroadestcommitment istobeingthusguilty

    ofhumanity.

    Classdifferenceissometimesimbricatedwithethnicorevenracialdifference,asintheblockbusterBobby(1973),wherearich

    HindubusinessmanssonfallsinlovewithaservantsGoanChristiangranddaughter. SimilarlyinMeraNaamJoker theeponymousJokerfalls

    inloveseriallywiththreewomenfromdifferentclass,ethnicorracialbackgrounds,includingaNorthIndianChristianandevenaRussian

    woman.2 Hilariouslybutmeaningfully,RajutheIndianjokerismistakenforaRussian.Kapoorpointedlyusesthisdevicetocommunicatehis

    messageoftransnationalsolidarityinatimewhenpostcolonialIndiasNehruvianorientationwasmoretotheSovietUnionthantotheUnited

    States.ThisnodoubtcontributedtoKapoorsbeingwelcomedintheSovietUnionasComradeVagabond.

    AnotherimportantclusteroftopoiinKapoorsfilmsemergesashiscomplexrepresentationsofmasculinityandfemininityinthe

    newIndia. HisimagesofthemodernIndianmale,andexplorationsofrelationshipsbetweenmen,areoftenstructurallycritical: therakeand

    thesincerelover,thelawabidingcitizenversusthevagabond.Kapoorsrepresentationofwomenwasifanythingmorecomplicated

    sometimesapproximating

    aproto

    feminist

    sensitivity,

    but

    at

    other

    moments

    verging

    on

    sexual

    objectification

    or

    prurience.

    Indeed

    one

    critic

    suggeststhatKapoormanifestedthecarnalityofaschoolboy.Hedidseemtodelightintemptingthecensorwithhishighlysexualized

    representationsofwomeninarangeoffilms.Yethisbroaderambitionwastointerrogatesocialinstitutionsandarrangementssuchas

    marriage,patriarchy,thedysfunctionalfamily,andthepolicingofsexuality.InMeraNaamJokerforinstance,heintroducesthecharacterof

    Meenaasasinglewomanwhomustmasqueradeasaboytoprotectherselffromamisogynistandpatriarchalculture. Butthemost

    complicatedfemalepresenceinKapoorsworkandlifewasalwaysNargis,theactorwithwhomhehadanintenseon andanoffscreen

    relationship.

    Thisretrospective,whichincidentallylooksforwardtotheapproaching25thanniversaryofKapoorspassing,promisestobeatreat

    forcinephilesandloversofIndiancinemabutalsoafascinatingculturalintroductionforothers. TonightsfilmisShree420,orMister420. The

    titlederivesoriginallyfromsection420oftheIndianPenalCodeunderwhichfeloniessuchastheftanddeceptionareprosecuted. Incommon

    parlance,though,

    this

    number

    has

    become

    acatch

    phrase,

    referring

    to

    any

    kind

    of

    mischief.

    Generically

    then

    this

    is

    another

    manifestation

    of

    thewise,tragicorotherwisecomplicatedclownfigurethatwassodeartothedirectorsheart. ForKapoorthisfooltaughtlaughternotagainst

    lifebutforandwithlife. InthisspiritIhopeyouwillenjoythisfilmandtherestoftheretrospective.

    Andnow,onwiththeshow.

    1Rajeev(ShashiKapoorappearsatjusttherightmomentofcourseasherprospectivemate. HisfirstencounterwiththebeautifulbutscarredRupaisatarailwaystation,relativelydark

    thoughitis,itisstillsurprisingthathedoesnotevenseeher,whensheisalmostintouchingdistance. Hisfirstencounterafterthatiswithhervoice; thevillagehasbecomeaccustomedto

    hersingingintheearlymorning.Rajeevappreciatesthebeautifulsinging,buthismistakenpremiseisthatonlyabeautifulfacecanbeassociatedwithabeautifulvoice. RajKapoorsself

    appointedtaskthenistoshowhowheandthereforetheviewermustdisabusehimorherself ofthatmistakenpresence. Ofcoursetheprocessoccursinstages. Someofthemaremirth

    producing,suchastheoccasiononwhichRajeevattendsavillagefairhopingtomeetthevillagegirlRupawithwhosevoicehehasbecomesmitten. Heassumesshewillbebeautiful,buthis

    limitedunderstanding

    of

    what

    is

    beautiful

    is

    already

    signaled

    when

    he

    walks

    into

    afairground

    display

    of

    distorting

    mirrors.

    He

    turns

    away

    in

    horror

    and

    fright

    from

    his

    own

    distorted

    reflection,

    asthoughheweresurprisedbythedistortionthisitselfissurprisinginanengineerwhoclearlyhasbeeninstrumentalintheconstructionofthedamwhoseinaugurationhehascometothe

    villagetoattend. Herevealsthathecannottolerateanyformofugliness. Thefilmclearlypresentsthisastheflawintheheroscharacter. Pointedlyheisasked,ifheweretofaceugliness

    inreallife,howcouldheexpecttofaceit?

    2InBobbyitisarguablyeventhecentraltheme,foritisthechiefimpedimentinthefilmsstory. TheprotagonistRajaisthescionofabusinessmanandhiswife,butwasbroughtupbytheir

    Christiannanny,Mrs.Braganza. Importantly,Rajafeelsclosertotheservant,wholovedhimlikeamother,morethantohisownparents.RajasfatherdeniesthematchbetweenMrs.

    BraganzasgranddaughterBobbyandRajapreciselyonthegroundsofthedifferenceinclassbetweenthelovers.