Randfontein Local Municipality Water Services Development Plan

Randfontein Local Municipality

Water Services Development Plan

2006/07

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com

http://www.pdffactory.com

Randfontein Local Municipality

Water Services Development Plan

JUNE 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pp

A. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 B. ADMINISTRATION.................................................................................................................... 2 1. NAME OF WSA..................................................................................................................2 2. STATUS OF WSDP............................................................................................................2 3. WSDP DRAFTING TEAM.................................................................................................. 2 4. PROCESSED FOLLOWED............................................................................................... 2 5. COMMENTS ..................................................................................................................... 3 6. ADOPTION RECORD ....................................................................................................... 3 7. WSDP COORDINATOR(S) ............................................................................................... 3 8. PROJECT MANAGEMENT FUNCTION (PMU)................................................................. 3 9. DWAF ASSET TRANSFER AGREEMENT........................................................................ 4 10. GENERAL......................................................................................................................... 4 10.1 Service Level Policy .......................................................................................................... 4 C. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 5 1. ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS................................................................................................. 5 2. WATER SERVICES BUSINESS ELEMENT SUMMARY................................................... 7 D. BACKGROUND TO THE AREA.............................................................................................. 14 1. LOCATION...................................................................................................................... 14 2. WATER SERVICES AUTHORITY PERSPECTIVE ......................................................... 16 3. PHYSICAL PERSPECTIVE............................................................................................. 16 4. DEMOGRAPHIC PERSPECTIVE.................................................................................... 16 5. REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE............................................................................................ 17



ii E. IDP AND WSDP GOALS AND INTEGRATION....................................................................... 19 F. WATER SERVICES BUSINESS ELEMENTS.......................................................................... 21 1. SOCIO ECONOMIC PROFILE ........................................................................................ 21 1.1 Demographics ................................................................................................................. 21 1.1.1 Situation Assessment (Demographics)............................................................................ 21 1.1.1.1 Current Consumer Profile................................................................................................ 21 1.1.1.2 Poor household definition ................................................................................................ 23 1.1.1.3 Present population and projected population growth rates .............................................. 23 1.1.1.4 Demographic trends and migration patterns .................................................................... 25 1.1.1.5 Age and gender Profile.................................................................................................... 25 1.1.2 Future Trends and Goals (Demographics)....................................................................... 26 1.1.2.1 Consumer Profile............................................................................................................. 26 1.1.2.2 Population and projected population growth rates ........................................................... 26 1.1.2.3 Demographic trends and migration patterns .................................................................... 26 1.1.2.4 Age and gender Profile.................................................................................................... 26 1.1.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Demographics) .......................................................................... 26 1.1.4 Implementation Strategies (Demographics)..................................................................... 27 1.2 Health.............................................................................................................................. 27 1.2.1 Situation Assessment (Health) ........................................................................................ 27 1.2.1.1 Health Profile................................................................................................................... 27 1.2.2 Future Trends and Goals (Health) ................................................................................... 27 1.2.2.1 Health Profile................................................................................................................... 27 1.2.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Health)....................................................................................... 28 1.2.4 Implementation Strategies (Health) ................................................................................. 28 1.3 Employment and Income................................................................................................. 28 1.3.1 Situation Assessment (Employment and Income)............................................................ 28 1.3.1.1 Employment Profile ......................................................................................................... 28 1.3.1.2 Household income........................................................................................................... 28 1.3.2 Future Trends and Goals (Employment and Income) ...................................................... 29 1.3.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Employment and Income).......................................................... 29 1.3.4 Implementation Strategies (Employment and Income)..................................................... 29 1.4 Economics....................................................................................................................... 29 1.4.1 Situation Assessment (Economics) ................................................................................. 29 1.4.1.1 Economic sectors, GGP contribution and employment .................................................... 29 1.4.1.2 Economic trends.............................................................................................................. 30 1.4.2 Future Trends and Goals (Economics) ............................................................................ 31 1.4.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Economics)................................................................................ 31 1.4.4 Implementation Strategies (Economics) .......................................................................... 31 2. SERVICE LEVEL PROFILE ............................................................................................ 31 2.1 Residential Consumer Units ............................................................................................ 31 2.1.1 Situation Assessment (Residential Consumer Units)....................................................... 31 2.1.1.1 Residential Consumer Units for Water and Sanitation: Level of services ......................... 31 2.1.1.2 Residential Consumer Units for Water............................................................................. 32 2.1.1.3 Residential Consumer Units for Sanitation ...................................................................... 32 2.1.1.4 Grey Water Management ................................................................................................ 33 2.1.1.5 Pit emptying and sludge disposal .................................................................................... 33 2.1.2 Future Trends and Goals (Residential Consumer Units).................................................. 33 2.1.2.1 Residential Consumer Units for Water & Sanitation: Level of service .............................. 33 2.1.2.2 Residential Consumer Units for Water............................................................................. 33 2.1.2.3 Residential Consumer Units for Sanitation ...................................................................... 34 2.1.2.4 Grey Water Management ................................................................................................ 34



iii 2.1.2.5 Pit emptying and sludge disposal .................................................................................... 34 2.1.2.6 Types of sanitation technology options............................................................................ 34 2.1.2.7 2010 target for basic sanitation........................................................................................ 34 2.1.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Residential Consumer Units) ..................................................... 34 2.1.4 Implementation Strategies (Residential Consumer Units)................................................ 35 2.2 Public Institutions and ‘dry’ industries .............................................................................. 36 2.2.1 Situation Assessment (Public Institutions and ‘dry’ industries)......................................... 36 2.2.1.1 Public Institutions and ‘dry’ industries .............................................................................. 36 2.2.2 Future Trends And Goals (Public Institutions and ‘dry’ industries) ................................... 37 2.2.2.1 Public Institutions and ‘dry’ industries .............................................................................. 37 2.2.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Public Institutions and ‘dry’ industries) ....................................... 37 2.2.4 Implementation Strategies (Public Institutions and ‘dry’ industries).................................. 37 2.3 Wet Industries ................................................................................................................. 37 2.3.1 Situation Assessment (Wet industries) ............................................................................ 37 2.3.1.1 Wet Industries: Urban and Rural ..................................................................................... 37 2.3.2 Future Trends and Goals (Wet industries)....................................................................... 38 2.3.2.1 Wet Industries: Urban and rural....................................................................................... 38 2.3.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Wet industries)........................................................................... 38 2.3.4 Implementation Strategies (Wet industries) ..................................................................... 38 2.4 ‘Raw’ Water Consumers.................................................................................................. 38 2.4.1 Situation Assessment (‘Raw’ Water Consumers)............................................................. 38 2.4.1.1 ‘Raw’ Water Consumers: Urban and Rural ...................................................................... 38 2.4.2 Future Trends and Goals (‘Raw’ Water Consumers) ....................................................... 38 2.4.2.1 ‘Raw’ Water Consumers: Urban and Rural ...................................................................... 38 2.4.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (‘Raw’ Water Consumers)........................................................... 39 2.4.4 Implementation Strategies (‘Raw’ Water Consumers)...................................................... 39 2.5 Industrial Consumer Units ............................................................................................... 39 2.5.1 Situation Assessment (Industrial Consumer Units) .......................................................... 39 2.5.1.1 Industrial Consumer Units for Sanitation: Urban and Rural.............................................. 39 2.5.2 Future Trends and Goals (Industrial Consumer Units)..................................................... 39 2.5.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Industrial Consumer Units) ........................................................ 39 2.5.4 Implementation Strategies (Industrial Consumer Units) ................................................... 39 2.6 Industries and their permitted effluent releases ............................................................... 39 2.6.1 Situation Assessment (Industries and their permitted effluent releases) .......................... 39 2.6.1.1 Industries and their permitted effluent releases ............................................................... 39 2.6.2 Future Trends and Goals (Industries and their permitted effluent releases)..................... 40 2.6.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Industries and their permitted effluent releases) ........................ 40 2.6.4 Implementation Strategies (Industries and their permitted effluent releases) ................... 40 3. WATER RESOURCE PROFILE ...................................................................................... 40 3.1 Water Source .................................................................................................................. 40 3.1.1 Situation Assessment (Water Source) ............................................................................. 40 3.1.1.1 Surface Water Source ..................................................................................................... 40 3.1.1.2 Groundwater Sources...................................................................................................... 40 3.1.1.3 Groundwater Monitoring .................................................................................................. 41 3.1.1.4 External Sources (where the WSA purchase water from others) ..................................... 41 3.1.1.5 Water returned to resources ............................................................................................ 42 3.1.2 Future Trends And Goals (Water Source) ....................................................................... 42 3.1.2.1 Water Returned to resources........................................................................................... 42 3.1.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Water Source) ........................................................................... 42 3.1.4 Implementation Strategies (Water Source)...................................................................... 42 3.2 Water Quality .................................................................................................................. 43 3.2.1 Situation Assessment (Water Quality) ............................................................................. 43



iv 3.2.1.1 Quality of water taken from source: urban ....................................................................... 43 3.2.1.2 Quality of water taken from source: rural ......................................................................... 43 3.2.1.3 Reporting on quality of water taken from source: urban and rural.................................... 44 3.2.1.4 Quality of water returned to the resource: urban.............................................................. 44 3.2.1.5 Quality of water returned to the resource: rural................................................................ 44 3.2.1.6 Pollution contingency measures ...................................................................................... 45 3.2.2 Future Trends and Goals (Water Quality) ........................................................................ 45 3.2.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Water Quality)............................................................................ 45 3.2.4 Implementation Strategies (Water Quality) ...................................................................... 45 3.3 Waterborne Sanitation..................................................................................................... 45 3.3.1 Situation Assessment (Waterborne Sanitation)................................................................ 45 3.3.2 Future Trends and Goals (Waterborne Sanitation) .......................................................... 45 3.3.3 Strategic Gap and Analysis (Waterborne Sanitation) ....................................................... 46 3.3.4 Implementation Strategies (Waterborne Sanitation)......................................................... 46 4. WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT INTERVENTIONS .............................................. 46 4.1 Situation Assessment (Water Resource Management Interventions) .............................. 46 4.1.1 Targets for reducing unaccounted for water and water inefficiencies (Ml/year: urban) ..... 47 4.1.2 Targets for reducing unaccounted for water and water inefficiencies (Ml/year: rural)....... 48 4.1.3 Reducing high pressures for residential consumers: urban ............................................. 48 4.1.4 Reducing high pressures for residential consumers: rural ............................................... 49 4.1.5 Consumer/end-use demand management: public information and education

programmes .................................................................................................................... 49 4.1.6 Leak and meter repair programmes: urban...................................................................... 49 4.1.7 Leak and meter repair programmes: rural........................................................................ 49 4.1.8 Working for Water Programme........................................................................................ 50 4.1.9 Conjunctive use of surface – and groundwater................................................................ 50 4.2 Future Trends and Goals (Water Resource Management Interventions) ......................... 50 4.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Water Resource Management Interventions)............................. 50 4.4 Implementation Strategies (Water Resource Management Interventions) ...................... 50 5. Water Service Infrastructure Profile ................................................................................. 52 5.1 Situation Assessment (Water Services Infrastructure) ..................................................... 52 5.1.1 Existing infrastructure...................................................................................................... 52 5.1.2 Existing groundwater infrastructure ................................................................................. 54 5.1.3 Existing surface water infrastructure................................................................................ 54 5.1.4 Existing water treatment works infrastructure .................................................................. 54 5.1.5 Existing pump stations infrastructure............................................................................... 54 5.1.6 Existing bulk pipeline infrastructure ................................................................................. 55 5.1.7 Existing reservoir infrastructure ....................................................................................... 55 5.1.8 Existing reticulation infrastructure (by supply zone) ......................................................... 56 5.1.9 Existing sanitation Infrastructure...................................................................................... 56 5.1.10 Existing Asset Management Assessment ........................................................................ 61 5.1.11 Assessment of Existing Operations ................................................................................. 61 5.1.12 Assessment of Existing Maintenance .............................................................................. 61 5.1.13 Schemes to be transferred: water.................................................................................... 61 5.1.14 Schemes to be transferred: sanitation ............................................................................. 61 5.1.15 Schemes to be rehabilitated ............................................................................................ 61 5.2 Future Trends and Goals (Water Services Infrastructure)................................................ 61 5.2.1 New Infrastructure to be built........................................................................................... 61 5.2.2 Future internal and connector infrastructure .................................................................... 62 5.2.3 Future bulk water supply infrastructure............................................................................ 62 5.2.4 Future bulk sanitation infrastructure................................................................................. 63



v 5.2.5 Asset Management Plan ................................................................................................. 63 5.2.5.1 Operational Plan.............................................................................................................. 64 5.2.5.2 Maintenance Plan............................................................................................................ 65 5.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Water Services Infrastructure) ................................................... 66 5.4 Implementation Strategies (Water Services Infrastructure).............................................. 66 6. WATER BALANCE.......................................................................................................... 67 6.1 Water Balance................................................................................................................. 67 6.1.1 Situation Assessment (Water Balance)............................................................................ 67 6.1.1.1 Amount of bulk water abstracted (Ml/year) ...................................................................... 67 6.1.1.2 Amount of bulk water purchased from others (Ml/year).................................................... 67 6.1.1.3 Water supplied to consumers (Ml/year) – urban .............................................................. 68 6.1.1.3.1 Categorisation of residential uncontrolled volume supply (Ml/year).................................. 68 6.1.1.4 Water supplied to consumers (Ml/year) – rural ................................................................ 69 6.1.1.5 Total physical water losses (Ml/year)............................................................................... 69 6.1.1.6 Total influent received at treatment works ....................................................................... 69 6.1.1.6.1 Total returns to the water resource system...................................................................... 71 6.1.2 Future Trends and Goals (Water Balance) ...................................................................... 71 6.1.2.1 Amount of bulk water abstracted (Ml/year) ...................................................................... 71 6.1.2.2 Amount of bulk purchased from others (Ml/year) ............................................................. 71 6.1.2.3 Water Supplied to consumers (Ml/year) – urban.............................................................. 71 6.1.2.3.1 Categorisation of residential uncontrolled volume supply (Ml/year).................................. 71 6.1.2.4 Water Supplied to consumers (Ml/year) – rural................................................................ 71 6.1.2.5 Total physical water losses (Ml/year)............................................................................... 71 6.1.2.6 Total influent received at treatment works ....................................................................... 72 6.1.2.7 Total returns to the water resource system...................................................................... 72 6.1.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Water Balance).......................................................................... 72 6.1.4 Implementation Strategies (Water Balance) .................................................................... 72 7. WATER SERVICES INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS .............................................. 72 7.1 Water Services Institutional Arrangements ...................................................................... 72 7.1.1 Situation Assessment (Water Services Institutional Arrangements)................................. 72 7.1.1.1 WSA functions and outputs ............................................................................................. 73 7.1.1.2 WSA capacity development............................................................................................. 74 7.1.1.3 Bylaws affecting water services....................................................................................... 74 7.1.1.4 Water Services providers (retail water) – current year ..................................................... 75 7.1.1.5 Water services providers (sanitation) – current year ........................................................ 75 7.1.1.6 Water services providers (bulk water) – current............................................................... 75 7.1.1.7 Water services provider (bulk sanitation) – current .......................................................... 76 7.1.1.8 Support services agents (water) – current ....................................................................... 76 7.1.1.9 Sanitation promotion agent – current............................................................................... 77 7.1.1.10 Support service contracts – current ................................................................................. 77 7.1.1.11 Water service institution .................................................................................................. 77 7.1.1.12 WSP staffing levels: water ............................................................................................... 77 7.1.1.13 WSP Staffing levels: sanitation........................................................................................ 77 7.1.1.14 WSP training programme ................................................................................................ 78 7.1.2 Future Trends and Goals (Water Services Institutional Arrangements)............................ 78 7.1.2.1 Water Services providers (retail water) – year 5 .............................................................. 78 7.1.2.2 Water Services providers (sanitation) – year 5 ................................................................ 78 7.1.2.3 Water services provider (bulk water) – year 5.................................................................. 78 7.1.2.4 Water services provider (bulk sanitation) – year 5 ........................................................... 78 7.1.2.5 Support services agents (water) – year 5 ........................................................................ 79 7.1.2.6 Sanitation promotion agent – year 5 ................................................................................ 79



vi 7.1.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Water Services Institutional Arrangements) ............................... 79 7.1.4 Implementation Strategies (Water Services Institutional Arrangements).......................... 79 8. CUSTOMER SERVICES PROFILE................................................................................. 80 8.1 Customer Services Profile ............................................................................................... 80 8.1.1.1 Quality of service for water: urban ................................................................................... 81 8.1.1.2 Quality of service for water: rural ..................................................................................... 81 8.1.1.3 Attending to complaints for water: urban.......................................................................... 81 8.1.1.4 Attending to complaints for water: rural ........................................................................... 81 8.1.1.5 Attending to complaints for sanitation: urban ................................................................... 82 8.1.1.6 Attending to complaints for sanitation: rural ..................................................................... 82 8.1.1.7 Education for basic water services .................................................................................. 82 8.1.1.8 Pollution awareness ........................................................................................................ 82 8.1.2 Future Trends and Goals (Customer Services)................................................................ 82 8.1.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Customer Services) ................................................................... 83 8.1.4 Implementation Strategies (Customer Services).............................................................. 83 9. FINANCIAL PROFILE ..................................................................................................... 83 9.1 Capital Funds .................................................................................................................. 83 9.1.1 Situation Assessment (Capital Funds)............................................................................. 83 9.1.1.1 Capital expenditure: water ............................................................................................... 83 9.1.1.2 Capital expenditure: sanitation ........................................................................................ 84 9.1.1.3 Sources of capital income: water .................................................................................... 84 9.1.1.4 Sources of capital income: sanitation .............................................................................. 85 9.1.2 Future Trends and Goals (Capital Funds)........................................................................ 85 9.1.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Capital Funds) ........................................................................... 86 9.1.4 Implementation Strategies (Capital Funds)...................................................................... 86 9.2 Operating Costs and Income........................................................................................... 86 9.2.1 Situation Assessment (Operating costs & income) .......................................................... 86 9.2.1.1 Operating costs: water..................................................................................................... 86 9.2.1.2 Operating costs: sanitation .............................................................................................. 87 9.2.1.3 Operating income: subsidies .......................................................................................... 87 9.2.1.4 Operating income: tariffs ................................................................................................. 88 9.2.2 Future Trends and Goals (Operating cost & income)....................................................... 88 9.2.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Operating cost & income) .......................................................... 88 9.2.4 Implementation Strategies (Operating cost & income)..................................................... 88 9.3 Tariff & Charges: Residential........................................................................................... 88 9.3.1 Situation Assessment (Tariff & Charges)......................................................................... 88 9.3.1.1 Fixed charges: residential (per month) for water.............................................................. 88 9.3.1.2 Fixed charges: residential (per month) for sanitation ....................................................... 88 9.3.1.3 Volume charges or other charge mechanisms: residential sanitation............................... 89 9.3.1.4 Block tariffs: residential (cents/kl) for water...................................................................... 89 9.3.2 Future Trends and Goals (Tariff & Charges).................................................................... 89 9.3.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Tariff & Charges) ....................................................................... 91 9.3.4 Implementation Strategies (Tariff & Charges).................................................................. 91 9.4 Free Basic Water and Sanitation ..................................................................................... 91 9.4.1 Situation Assessment (Free Basic Water and Sanitation)................................................ 91 9.4.1.1 Subsidy targeting approach for free basic water .............................................................. 92 9.4.1.2 Subsidy targeting approach for free basic sanitation........................................................ 92 9.4.2 Future Trends and Goals (Free Basic Water and Sanitation)........................................... 92 9.4.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Free Basic Water and Sanitation) .............................................. 92 9.4.4 Implementation Strategies (Free Basic Water and Sanitation)......................................... 92



vii 9.5 Charges and Block Tariffs: Industrial & Commercial........................................................ 92 9.5.1 Situation Assessment (Charges & Block Tariffs).............................................................. 92 9.5.1.1 Fixed charges and block tariffs: industrial for water ......................................................... 92 9.5.1.2 Fixed charges and block tariffs: industrial for wastewater ................................................ 93 9.5.1.3 Fixed charges and block tariffs: commercial for water ..................................................... 93 9.5.1.4 Fixed charges and block tariffs: commercial for wastewater ............................................ 93 9.5.1.5 Fixed charges and block tariffs: other for water ............................................................... 93 9.5.1.6 Fixed charges and block tariffs: other for sanitation ......................................................... 93 9.5.2 Future Trends And Goals (Charges & Block Tariffs)........................................................ 94 9.5.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Charges & Block Tariffs)............................................................ 94 9.5.4 Implementation Strategies (Charges & Block Tariffs)....................................................... 94 9.6 Income And Sales ........................................................................................................... 94 9.6.1 Situation Assessment (Income and Sales) ...................................................................... 94 9.6.1.1 Total income (and non-payment) and expenditure: water ................................................ 95 9.6.1.2 Total income (and non-payment) and expenditure: sanitation.......................................... 96 9.6.1.3 Sales arrangements ........................................................................................................ 96 9.6.2 Future Trends and Goals................................................................................................. 96 9.6.3 Strategic Gap Analysis .................................................................................................... 96 9.6.4 Implementation Strategies ............................................................................................... 97 9.7 Metering and Billing......................................................................................................... 97 9.7.1 Situation Assessment (Metering and Billing).................................................................... 97 9.7.1.1 Metering and billing: urban .............................................................................................. 97 9.7.1.2 Metering and billing: rural dense...................................................................................... 98 9.7.1.3 Metering and billing: rural villages.................................................................................... 98 9.7.1.4 Metering and billing: rural scattered................................................................................. 98 9.7.1.5 Metering and billing: rural farmland.................................................................................. 98 9.7.2 Future Trends And Goals (Metering and Billing).............................................................. 98 9.7.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Metering and Billing).................................................................. 98 9.7.4 Implementation Strategies (Metering and Billing)............................................................. 98 10. LIST OF PROJECTS....................................................................................................... 99 10.1 Projects ........................................................................................................................... 99 10.1.1 Situation Assessment (Projects)...................................................................................... 99 10.1.1.1 Annual water and sanitation project list ........................................................................... 99 10.1.1.2 WSA sustainability project list.......................................................................................... 99 10.1.1.3 Proposed WSDP projects for inclusion in IDP (IDP format) ............................................. 99 10.1.2 Future Trends and Goals (Projects)................................................................................. 99 10.1.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Projects) ...................................................................................100 10.1.4 Implementation Strategies (Projects)..............................................................................100



1

A. INTRODUCTION

The 2006/07 WSDP for the Randfontein Local Municipality (RLM) is presented below in the latest format (version 9) as required by the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry. The report was compiled using information extracted from a variety of sources, e.g. the previous WSDP (March 2003), the latest available Master Plans (September 2003), various reports done by the West Rand District Municipality, Census 2001; while most of the information contained in the various tables (as per WSDP template) have been supplied with the most current information from the relevant municipal departments. Some recalculations and new estimates were made. There drafting of this WSDP has been difficult and frustrating at times. There are many gaps in the requested information. In most cases, this is simply not available from any source. One of the most urgent gaps/backlogs identified in this exercise, is the lack of information as well as the extreme lack of capacity to gather the necessary information. It is very unlikely that the municipality will have internal capacity to assist in this regard in the near future. Consideration should be given to utilising future WSDP funding to assist the municipality with this kind of information gathering. These limitations severely hampered the drafting of this WSDP and the quality of the outcome. The new version 9 approach to the drafting of the WSDP is extremely information-hungry. Much of the information is to be obtained from departments other than the engineering departments (should it be available at all), or from organisations external to the municipality. During the drafting of this WSDP, serious effort was made to obtain the necessary information, but sadly, in many instances, these efforts were unsuccessful. Given that the information and discussions as required in the version 9 template is seen as a best-practice guideline to which a WSA should be striving, the approach was adopted in this WSDP to follow the format as recommended, supplying information where possible. Where the necessary information is not available however, this is stated, and these omissions will guide the actions flowing from the WSDP, in order to improve annually on the quality of information available.



2

B. ADMINISTRATION

1. NAME OF WSA

1. Name Randfontein Local Municipality 2. Address P O Box 218, Randfontein, 1760

2. STATUS OF WSDP

The WSDP is currently a draft WSDP. Due to the fact that the master plans are also in the process of being updated, much of the information in the WSDP will also be updated in the short term. Other information is not available and measures should be implemented to gather the relevant information in preparation of future WSDP’s.

Status Reference date (Period applicable) Date submitted

Draft 2006/07 31 July 2006 To be adopted N/A N/A

3. WSDP DRAFTING TEAM

Water services authority

Component Chapter Name Designation Role Telephone No E-mail

All All D Venter Acting Unit Head: Civil Works & Water Purification

Team leader 011 411 0199 daan.venter@randfontein. org.za

Financial F.9 G Bologna / I Mashigo

Director: Finance Team member

011 411 0086 giovanni.bologna@randfontein. org.za

Health J Makutulela Director Social Services

Team member

011 411 0055 bettie.vanheerden@randfontein. org.za

Socio Economic Profile

L Ntshinga-Makoro

Director Development Planning

Team member

011 411 0318 leanne.scheepers@randfontein. org.za

Consultants

Component Chapter Name Designation Role Telephone

No E-mail

All All Dr L Geustyn Director Project sponsor 021 8800388 [email protected] All All A van Niekerk Engineer Project leader 082 455 2066 [email protected] All All B van der

Westhuyzen Engineer Technologist 021 8800388 [email protected]

4. PROCESSED FOLLOWED

According to Section 14 of the Water Services Act, a Water Services Authority has to take reasonable steps to communicate the WSDP to the different stakeholders to allow for opportunity to comment.


mailto:[email protected]




3 The consultation process within Randfontein Local Municipality takes place as an integral part of the broader IDP process. During the consultation process of the IDP, water services related issues are noted and referred to the relevant departments for investigation and action. Where appropriate, issues pertaining to water services are considered individually or as part of the Water and Sanitation Master Plans. These inform the WSDP. During the drafting of the WSDP, the various relevant departments in the RLM have been visited, both with the view of creating awareness, ensuring buy-in as well as for the gathering of information.

5. COMMENTS

Components Interest Group Considerations Comments N/A N/A N/A N/A

6. ADOPTION RECORD

Components Action Approval reference Date N/A N/A N/A N/A

7. WSDP COORDINATOR(S)

Name Designation Role Telephone No E-mail W de Wet Director: Infrastructure Manager 011 411 0216 [email protected] D Venter Acting Unit Head: Civil

Works & Water Purification Team owner 011 411 0199 [email protected]

8. PROJECT MANAGEMENT FUNCTION (PMU)

Section 10.3 of the policy Framework for MIG states that each of the identified municipalities is required to set up a Project Management Unit. If the PMU has been established in the municipality it must also manage water services projects using MIG funds. At RLM, provision has been made for a Project Management Unit (PMU), which is to be funded from Randfontein’s annual MIG allocation. A business plan in this regard has already been approved by DPLG and the PMU functions are set to commence on 1 August 2006. The PMU will report directly to the Municipal Manager and will be headed by a Project Manager assisted by a Technician. Appointments for both these positions have already been finalised. Resources available to perform function:

Yes No N/A Comment Is there budget? Y Are there By-laws? Y Existing by-laws are currently being revised Is there infrastructure? Y Personnel available? Y





4 9. DWAF ASSET TRANSFER AGREEMENT

The transfer of DWAF Assets does not apply to RLM 10. GENERAL

10.1 Service Level Policy

1. Does the WSA have Service level policy for water? Yes

2. Does the WSA have Service level policy for and sanitation? Yes

3. If no, when will such a policy be in place? n.a.

4. Does the WSA have Community participation plan for selection of Service level?

No

5. If no, when will such a Plan be in place?

Although an SLP has been adopted, current trends in Gauteng calls for a full LOS for all developments.

The RLM Service Levels Policies for Water and Sanitation respectively, are discussed in more detail in the main report. In short, the RLM service level policies provide for full service to all residents. The only exception is in transitional or informal areas, where temporary services are provided. This is done due to cost considerations, as well as the fact that, according to the housing policy, residents are to be relocated to formal housing areas as soon as possible, which are serviced fully. There is the question whether dual reticulation systems should be considered. Should this be done, as a measure to better utilise the total water resource, it should be borne in mind that dual reticulation systems would be subject to higher associated capital investment and O & M costs.



5

C. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Randfontein Local Municipality appointed Geustyn, Loubser and Streicher to assist in the drafting of its WSDP in 2005. GLS is also in the process of updating the RLM Water and Sanitation Master Plans. Due to the annual nature of the WSDP, it is not possible to obtain latest up-to-date master plan results for inclusion in the WSDP, as this process will only be completed after the due date for the WSDP. The Randfontein Local Municipality (RLM) is the Water Services Authority for its area of jurisdiction. It falls within the West Rand District Municipality’s (WRDM) demarcated area. Randfontein is situated approximately 46 km west of Johannesburg and owes its existence to the various gold mines located nearby. Randfontein follows a formal consultative process with respect to the preparation of its IDP. This consultative and participative process is an integrated process, and includes the necessary consultation with regard to water services. The WSDP is the sectoral plan informing, and being informed by, the IDP. During the drafting of the WSDP, it became apparent that one of the biggest factors impacting the provision of water services was the severe lack of resources available to the RLM officials. A lack of human resources is critical, while financial resources were mostly available from external sources (MIG funding). As part of the consultative process, discussions were had with other internal departments to obtain their input and buy-in. While being reasonably successful in some instances, in many cases the similar lack of resources hampered the degree of interaction and integration achieved. In general, a need exists for studies to be undertaken regarding socio-economics, health and certain financial aspects. While there is still a great need for the provision of direct engineering related services, these have generally been identified and plans identified for the provision thereof, albeit at a slower pace than ideal. There is however a relative lack of understanding, based on a lack of information, on the socio-economic aspects of water services, health issues and the role to be played by the health authorities, as well as issues of affordability and economics. These issues could also be included in an Integrated Water Resource Management Plan. Such a plan needs to be drafted with the participation of all role players. Such a Water Resource Planning approach is needed to ensure an integrated approach to the delivery of water services.

1. ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS What is the backlog?

The backlog is described in the various chapters of the main report. While some backlog exists in relation to the provision of services, this is mostly linked to the need and provision of housing. The backlog that exists in existing service areas is currently being identified and quantified in order to prioritise the elimination thereof. As discussed in various chapters, the biggest backlog exists in the resourcing of adequate numbers of qualified and experienced staff to deliver services.



6 What is the status of supply to higher levels of service?

The policies provide for the delivery of full services. The general level of service is therefore high. Where services are not provided in temporary or transitional areas, installation of full services are done through the housing delivery process, with the beneficiaries then relocated to such areas. Temporary services are provided in these areas in the interim. Cost of eradicating backlogs The cost component of the staff shortage is difficult to quantify. The capital cost required to provide for any backlogs is contained within the capital budget as indicated in Chapter F9. Further, also indicated in this chapter, additional requirements currently not included in the budget are shown separately. As mentioned, the backlog with regards to housing is contained within the Housing budget of the RLM. Impacting factors The biggest impacting factor is the slow process of final transformation of the local government structure, which negatively affects the appointment of staff required to deliver water services. Service delivery is also impacted on through a lack of availability of good information on which to base decisions, as well as the fact certain studies need to be undertaken to inform decisions regarding the best way forward. Another factor is the availability of funding, which, due to the heavy reliance on MIG funding, affects the pace of delivery which is dependant on the cash flow as allowed by the available budget. What is the status of all water infrastructure? The status of the infrastructure is generally good, but specific interventions are required to accommodate growth and maintenance needs. These are discussed in Chapter F5. The results of the new master plan, due in 2007, will provide the detail of the latest requirements. Water balance The water balance in the area is satisfactory. Provision of water is via the bulk service provider, Rand Water, who ensures that adequate sources and reserves are available. The level of unaccounted for water is unacceptably high. The proposals to remedy the situation are discussed in Chapter F6 and need implementation. Effective management Within the limitations as previously discussed, the water services are managed as effectively as possible. But transformational change, the appointment of staff and the establishment of the new integrated structure are prerequisites for the establishment of a fully functional organisation. Thereafter, proper processes, methodologies, the necessary studies and proposed interventions (e.g. a Water Resource Management Plan) would be required to ensure fully effective management of the service.



7 2. WATER SERVICES BUSINESS ELEMENT SUMMARY Socio-economic profile (Chapter F1)

During 2005, a draft was prepared to undertake a socio-economic survey of the area. With this survey not yet completed, the available information was the latest available from Statistics SA, the 2001 Census information. The total population in the area is estimated at 128 842 and there are approximately 28 000 households. The indigent population in the area is considered to be 3336, i.e. people in households with an income of less than R1 500/month. There is a strategic need for better socio-economic planning in the area. There is a lack of information, especially regarding economics and employment. There is a lack of integration regarding health and other social services as relating to water services. The situation is largely due to the lack of capacity. Where capacity is provided through consultants’ studies, there is no capacity for implementation. This results in poor planning for the future provision of services in general. The socio-economic profile and demographic details are further discussed in Chapter F1. Service level profile (Chapter F2) The current level of services provided can generally be considered as high. The policy is to provide on-site water connections and waterborne sanitation to all stands. This includes service provision to low-income households. The exception is provision of services to temporary and informal settlements. Rather than financing services where they cannot be provided permanently and cost-effectively, the focus is to provide the high level of services to formal housing areas, aiming to relocate informal settlers to such areas as soon as possible. In the informal and temporary settlements, basic temporary services are provided. A survey is currently being undertaken to determine the extent of areas with less than basic services, to ensure planning to eradicate the backlog as a priority. All consumers are provided with the basic free water supply of 6kl per month. While service provision levels are high, there is a question regarding affordability. Poor consumers using more than the basic free allocation would have problems affording their monthly expenses. RLM does not make use of dry sanitation systems nor are there any specific measures for the management of grey water. It is not planned to implement management of grey water in future. With regard to the 2010 sanitation targets, it seems that the current backlog could be accommodated by 2010, if the relocation of the Zenzele residents to the formal housing areas is completed. Continued migration to the area will however create a new “backlog” and it should be recognised that it is not anticipated that this new demand will be catered for by 2010. The cost of provision of the high levels of services is high. RLM utilises MIG funding for service provision, with counter-funding from internal sources. The extent of the funding required for this expensive development causes the funding allocations to be totally committed in the long term, resulting in implementation periods of multiple years. As previously stated, capacity shortages, in this case financial, is the major impacting factor in service provision. Also, specific information regarding public institutions, industries (wet and dry), raw water consumers, etc., is not available. To allow for future full reporting on all information requirements of the WSDP guidelines, an extensive information gathering exercise would be required.



8 Water resource profile (Chapter F3) Randfontein acquires all its bulk water from the bulk water services provider, Rand Water. The total potable water demand of the Randfontein system is supplied from the Rand Water bulk supply system. There are three connections to the Rand Water system. The development of Droogeheuvel and Badirile townships will both respectively require new connections to Rand Water’s supply. Subject to investigation, an additional reservoir may be required at the Westergloor site to augment storage capacity for the Middelvlei development. Current indications are that Rand Water will be able to supply future water demands. Boreholes are utilised as a water source mainly for farms and agricultural holdings. No records of abstraction is however available, nor has a groundwater database been established. No groundwater source information and future requirements are available. Some informal settlements, i.e. Manganese, Badirile and Drowell, are served with borehole water. These borehole installations are operated and maintained by council. It is intended that this reliance should be ended. A need exists for a comprehensive borehole audit (urban and rural) to determine additional/alternative water sources, should such be required in future. While some measurement of water quality occurs, a formal water quality monitoring program is not currently in place. Implementation of a water quality monitoring programme to comply with the stipulations of Regulation 5 of the Regulations under the Water Services Act (Act 108 of 1997), is planned for 2006/07. The municipality’s wastewater is currently treated at the Randfontein and Westonaria wastewater treatment works (WWTW). The volume of waste water as measured is unusually high. It is expected that this is due to stormwater ingress levels which are unacceptably high. There is an urgent need for an investigation into the causes and sources of stormwater ingress. The results of such an investigation will determine future action required. Furthermore, the proposed investigation into the potential of ground water sources, as well as the borehole audit, should be done, which should include the establishment of the ground water database. Water conservation and demand management (Chapter F4) Managing water demand has been identified as one of the critical challenges facing the Randfontein municipality. Current strategies which are utilised for demand management include a management information system which has recently been implemented, improved responsibility for the reading of bulk-meters to ensure accurate billing and improved credit control, to make consumers more aware of consumption, leading to reduced water demand. The strategic gap in terms of the implementation of Water Resource Management interventions is mostly due to a lack of resources. Only when this is adequately addressed, can the proper planning of other interventions (technical, educational) be undertaken and later implemented. There are past examples where implementation of planned interventions has suffered due to the lack of capacity (staff numbers). Managing water demand has been identified as one of the critical challenges facing the Randfontein municipality. This needs to be addressed as a matter of urgency, due to the potential negative implications for sustainable service delivery. Strategies need to be developed, but first, a strategy needs to be put in place to address the capacity shortfall. The municipality will have to address the staff shortage through a proper staffing strategy. This could include an investigation into outsourcing as an option.



9 In the main section of this report, in Chapter F4, various other possible strategies and interventions are discussed, e.g. a meter-replacement program, a community awareness campaign regarding payment for services, water audits, improved information management, improved management of unaccounted for water, etc.

While the above are examples of potential strategic interventions, water conservation and demand management would best be addressed through the drafting of a complete Integrated Water Resource Management Plan. Such a plan needs to include the input and participation of all role players, also other internal departments, and should be drafted as a first step to ensure proper Water Resource Planning. Water services Infrastructures profile (Chapter F5) RLM has six water reservoirs and three towers. The total storage capacity is 39.4 Megaliters. The reservoirs are all in an operational condition, with maintenance being demand based. The pipe network of the Randfontein distribution system consists of ± 361 km pressure pipelines with diameters varying between 38mm and 600mm. Based on a year 2003 estimate, the previous master plan calculated the replacement value of the Randfontein system at R 129 829 574. Construction is currently underway to split the Mohlakeng zone into separate reservoir and tower zones. Construction is also underway to split the Finsbury zone into separate reservoir and tower zones, with Finsbury to be supplied from the tower and with Kocksoord to be supplied from the reservoir. The entire sewerage system is divided into 9 drainage areas. These areas drain either to a pumping station or to a collector or outfall sewer. There are approximately 314 km of sewer pipelines in the Randfontein system of which ± 12.5 km are rising mains. There are 9 pump municipal pump stations in the system, plus an additional 5 privately owned pump stations in Randfontein that discharge sewerage into the sewer system. The estimated present average daily dry weather flow (ADDWF) in the system is ± 17 000 kℓ/day. There are two bulk sewer meters in the system, one at the Randfontein WCW and one at the inflow to Westonaria WCW. Randfontein’s own sewage treatment works are situated north of the town and has a capacity of 19 000 kℓ/d. The total sewer flow to the Randfontein works is ± 10 200 kℓ/d, which is ± 60% of the total sewer flow. The rest of the sewer flow, which is mainly the sewer flow from Mohlakeng, discharges to the neighbouring Westonaria WCW. The treated sewage from the Randfontein Works is discharged into the Elandsvlei Spruit. The required infrastructure to accommodate future development in Randfontein is largely due to expansion. The optimisation of existing infrastructure capacity through achieving a balance between expansion and infill or densification, is currently being addressed. Densification occurring throughout the town requires bulk infrastructure contributions to be made by developers, to improve storage capacity to maintain minimum requirements. No formula or policy currently exists to calculate equitable and fair developer contributions. Further investigations that are required include an investigation into stormwater ingress, an infiltration and leakage investigation, as well as a study and recommendation regarding Developer Bulk Services Contributions.



10 Water balance (Chapter F6) With the Water and Sanitation Master Plans in the process of being updated, the figures as determined in the previous master plans were used for this report. During the period under discussion the total water input into the three zones for Randfontein was 7 497.1 Ml, or 20 540 kl/d on average. At the time, the total water sold in Randfontein, for the year ending May 2003, was 5 602.2 Ml. Accordingly, the total annual Unaccounted for Water (UAW) was 1 849.9 Ml, or 25.3%, which is very high. These apparent losses in the Randfontein system is higher than the norm, and there is much potential for implementation of a water demand management program (as discussed earlier), with a view to conserving water, and lowering UAW and unit water demands. It is expected that the UAW figures do not reflect the reality and could be explained by the lack of individual meters in some areas or faulty meters. In terms of the sanitation, the total estimated average daily dry weather flow (ADDWF) of ± 17 000 kℓ/d represents ± 83% of the water consumption. As mentioned before, the total sewer flow to the Randfontein works is ± 10 200 kl/d (3 723 Ml/year), which is ± 60% of the total sewer flow. The total measured returns to the Elandspruit from the Randfontein Works during the past year was 2 600Ml, which represents 61.9% of the influent (± 4 200Ml). A total of 38.1% of the waster water is re-used. The perceived discrepancy between the flow figures above (4 200Ml vs. 3 723 Ml) is due to the use of the master plan figures (2003), as compared to the latest measurement (2005/06). This gives an indication of the growth during the previous two to three years, which will be updated and validated during the master planning process currently underway. As before, the most serious gap regarding the Water Balance is relating to the availability and quality of data and information. The improvement of this situation will allow for better analysis and enable better planning to improve the UAW figure for the area. It will also enable better planning of water services in general. Also, the general lack of capacity is a concern, with a lack of personnel and funding also affecting the proper management of the water balance. Water services institutional arrangements (Chapter F7) Randfontein Local Municipality is the Water Services Authority (WSA) for its area. Rand Water is appointed as the bulk water services provider to deliver bulk water and sells to RLM, who is the WSP. Partially, with regard to the mines and mine townships, Rand Water also provides a retail service. Randfontein Local Municipality is also the water services provider (bulk sanitation). The municipality has negotiated a management contract agreement with Rand Water (Sanitation Division) to manage the Randfontein wastewater treatment works. This management contract was negotiated for a 3-year period (commencing 1 May 2005) and will need to be re-negotiated at the end of this period. Westonaria Municipality is a de facto bulk water services provider, as it accepts bulk wastewater flow from Randfontein. A draft agreement with Westonaria for bulk wastewater, that has been available for some time, requires review and to be signed.



11 Some of the institutional issues that need to be resolved include:

• Lack of sufficient staffing capacity:

- This is the single biggest problem experienced by the water services sector in the Municipality. In terms of the implementation of projects and the management thereof, limited existing staff capacity is available. Currently, even if more funds were available, implementation would be problematic due to this lack of human resources.

- Transformation of the organisation should be completed as a matter of urgency. Due to the approach to restructure the Municipality’s whole structure as an entity during one process, delays in the finalization thereof are to be expected. These delays postpone effective service delivery and contribute to the backlog.

- Strategies should include improvement of staffing levels as well as improved performance through training and multi-skilling.

• Service to Zenzele Informal area: - The development of the alternate housing sites needs to be implemented to enable the

residents of the informal area of Zenzele to be relocated.

• The previous contract regarding the Westonaria treatment works requires review and signature.

• Preventative maintenance needs to be implemented and infrastructure upgraded and

rehabilitated to improve current poor performance relating to sewer blockages.

• An environmental impact assessment is to be conducted and reports submitted to DWAF to ensure compliance with licensing requirements and exemption permit conditions.

• A water services agreement should be made with Rand Water to resolve the issue of the

direct sale of water to mines by Rand Water.

• Consideration should be given to promote health and hygiene awareness through improved sanitation.

• Service delivery agreements with Sediba and Westonaria should be formalized.

Details of these and other issues are discussed in the main text in Chapter 7. Customer service profile (Chapter F8) Water Services service delivery in the urban environment in Randfontein can be said to function typically as in any normal Municipality of equal size. Customer services consist of the typical front office communication areas, as well as via telephone, electronic media, etc. There are no sections dealing explicitly with education and/or awareness campaigns. There is also no provision for specific capacity to be created in this regard with the proposed new organisational structure. General awareness and education is incorporated in the current HIV-AIDS awareness programmes. The municipality lacks sufficient capacity to deal with maintenance challenges due to serious understaffing. This issue is discussed in various sections of this report. One possible solution to improve service delivery is to consider multi-skilling of existing staff, which should include staff not currently within the engineering services. One suggestion could be the improved utilization of meter readers. If the service would be ring-fenced, this section should typically be reporting to the water services branch.



12 A symptom of understaffing is that, in most cases, the municipality reacts to problems rather than planning ahead and executing preventative measures. This causes customer relations to worsen, especially when problem could have been avoided if pro-active planning and implementation were possible. An established Integrated Water Demand Management Plan, managed by a Water Demand Section, should ensure proper service delivery, with resultant satisfactory customer relations. Some of the strategies reported elsewhere, e.g. pro-active actions like a leak-repair program, will have the effect of improving customer service, both by providing a more stable service and minimising the number of complaints received. Preventative measures, the finalisation of the organisational structure (with provision of additional staff needed) and the implementation of a water demand management plan will ensure effective, efficient and sustainable customer services.

Financial profile (Chapter F9) All funding for water services in Randfontein is obtained from the MIG Programme. Counter funding for MIG funds is budgeted from internal sources. Funding for the development of township internal infrastructure is budgeted by the Department of Housing. This funding is administered by the Department of Housing as they manage the housing projects. Other funding is obtained from Capacity Building Grants. It is anticipated that the current practices in terms of capital funding will continue in future. Developers contribute towards their required services through development levies. As stated earlier, a formal Development Levy formula and policy needs to be finalised. The Directorate: Finance determines the affordability of capital and operating expenditure and provides the framework within which budgeting is done, determining the extent of loans and expenditure from internal sources that are affordable. The quantum of the multi-year operating budget is shown in the tables in Chapter 9 of the main report. RLM has a fully implemented stepped tariff system in place for water services. The water tariff increase for the 2006/2007 financial year ranges from 0 % to 10 %, based on usage. The proposed increase for 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 is 6.5% annually. The 6 kl free basic water is accorded to all consumers. Similarly, the sewer tariff increases for the 2006/2007 financial year is 6.5 %, as also proposed for 2007/2008 and 2008/2009. The stepped water tariff for domestic consumers is intended to encourage savings in water usage. Low volume consumers will pay less and large consumers will pay more. There is no information available regarding reasons for non-payment or affordability. Such a study should be considered for the future. Provision has not been made for such a study in the immediate future, although the need has been acknowledged and is discussed in this report. The billing system for RLM is computerized and combined for all services. Bills are mostly sent by mail, but some are hand-delivered. Currently, collection of payment happens mainly at Council offices, although the “Payday”-system has already been implemented to provide ease of payment and arrangements are being made to allow payment at Post Offices. A clear policy is in place which spells out action that will be taken to collect debts.



13 List of projects (Chapter F10)

The list of capital projects that have been included in the RLM multi-year capital budget is shown in Chapter 10 of the main report. A further list of projects, which are necessary for the provision of water services, but which have not been included into any budget, is also shown in Chapter 10. These projects need to be placed on future budgets. Where required, preliminary planning and cost estimates, need to be completed in the mean time. As future needs are identified, these needs will be addressed through the annual three year budget process. As far as possible, MIG funds are utilised for the provision of service needs, with own internal funding being utilised for counter-funding. This practice will be continued in an effort to maximise the expenditure capabilities of Council for service provision.



14

D. BACKGROUND TO THE AREA 1. LOCATION

Randfontein is situated about 46 km west of Johannesburg and owes its existence to the various gold mines located nearby, mainly the Randfontein Estates and Harmony Gold Mines. According to the West Rand DM SDF 2002:

• The urban development in the area is of a diversified nature; • The presence of unsuitable geo-technical conditions hampers spontaneous urban

development; • Land ownership is primarily vested with mining/private landowners; • Large land areas are utilised for agricultural development; • There is relatively poor accessibility to and from Randfontein; • There is a lack of diversified economic conditions; • Large rural residential areas hamper spontaneous development; • There is a huge housing backlog and a presence of sensitive environmental areas.



15 Figure 1: Locality Plan



16 2. WATER SERVICES AUTHORITY PERSPECTIVE

Randfontein is a Local Municipality (RLM) that falls within the West Rand District Municipality’s demarcated area. RLM is the Water Services Authority for its area of service.

3. PHYSICAL PERSPECTIVE

Randfontein is situated almost on top of the continental divide, i.e. on the watershed. There are therefore no major rivers in the area, although three “spruite” drains the area, i.e the Middelvlei Spruit, Elandsvlei Spruit and the Wonderfontein Spruit. The area is also not mountainous, the man-made mine dumps being the outstanding topographical features of the area. As typical of the region, Randfontein also has a presence of dolomitic conditions, which influence development. The climate is typical of the summer rainfall areas that are predominant in the South African interior, with the rainfall type being thunder storms in the summer and very little winter rainfall. Minimum temperatures drop to just above freezing point at night in winter, in extreme cases going below zero. Summer temperatures are moderate to the high thirties in the hottest months.

4. DEMOGRAPHIC PERSPECTIVE

Whilst more detailed figures are provided in the Socio Economic Perspective (Chapter F1), some general characteristics are quoted here: The youth (< 34 years old) makes up more than half of the population (81 382). Literacy is relatively high, with more than 69 000 people qualified as secondary school or higher. There is a high reliance on mining for employment, with 36% of the labour force unemployed. There are disparities in income distribution in the region. There is inadequate information available regarding some of the demographics as specifically related to Randfontein. There are however better information available regarding the broader WRDM area (2001 - 2002), even though this does also not reflect the latest trends. The available sources are quoted below. According to the WRDM Cluster Report: Urban Economic Profile 2001, it was estimated that approximately 41.5% of the population in the WRDM lived in poverty during 2001. The Minimum Level of Living is taken as measurement of poverty and indicates the number of households living below a monthly household income of R1500 (Institute of Race Relations, 2001). Reports on Education provide differing results. According to the WRDM Cluster Report: Urban Economic Profile 2001, only 0.1% of all people in the WRDM area have matric, with ± 12% having no education at all. This varies sharply with the information as provided in Chapter F1 later in this report, where Statistics South Africa figures indicate more than 18% matriculants in the Randfontein area. The figures for “no education” are comparative at around 10%. The only conclusions could be that either Randfontein performs better than the rest of the WRDM area, or the sources cannot be trusted fully.



17 5. REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE

As stated before, there is more information available in the regional context. Randfontein falls within the area of jurisdiction of the West Rand District Municipality. This area of jurisdiction of the WRDM covers a total area of 4 066,61km2, containing Merafong City Local Municipality as the largest LM (1 631,7km2), followed by Mogale City LM (1 099,12km2), Westonaria LM (615,98km2) and Randfontein (477,37km2). The GTDMA41 (242,44km2) complete the WRDM’s area of jurisdiction.

The WRDM is located within the Western Sector of the Gauteng Province, west of the Urban Core of Johannesburg. The following areas define the WRDM boundaries:

• Tshwane Metropolitan Council; • City of Johannesburg • Emfuleni; • Potchefstroom area; • Ventersdorp area; • Rustenburg area.

One of the main physical issues within the WRDM area relates to the presence of dolomitic conditions, which have a severe influence on development. The topography of the West Rand ranges in altitude and the slopes of the Magaliesberg Mountain are of significant ecological importance. The area includes a number of rivers and dams all of which have potential for tourism development. Mining areas and land belonging to mining houses make up a big proportion of the land and discourages integration. The area contains both urban and rural areas. (Source: West Rand DM SDF, 2002 and WRDM IDP Review Plan, 2004/2005) Physical restrictions that affect the environment in the Randfontein area include the presence of dolomite and red data species. The presence of the mining activities, nature reserves, slopes and undermined areas are environmental issues to be considered. Randfontein is also functionally linked to the Mogale City urban complex, although the presence of mining activities ensures a degree of spatial separation between the two urban masses. The areas between Randfontein and Krugersdorp are also experiencing densification and infill development, with low income residential development extending from Mogale City in a south westerly direction towards Randfontein. Infill development refers to the utilisation of existing opens spaces within urban areas in order to densify urban areas and create more compact cities, thereby preventing uncontrolled urban sprawl. This expansion is however being curbed by the existence of large tracts of mining and related land. In terms of land use, the Spatial Development Framework (previously done IDP Review 2004/2005) identifies broad development zones in the West Rand District Municipal area. These potentially affect Randfontein to a more or lesser degree. In the Urban Growth Zone, areas of expected major urban development include Mohlakeng and Toekomsrus near Randfontein, which includes residential densification and infill as well as manufacturing and industrial. Areas which have a diverse resource base and which can be optimally utilised by the development of recreational, tourism, agricultural and conservation include Gatsrand (Randfontein LM).



18 Areas which are controlled by the mining houses and are well serviced, offer some opportunities for the development of small mining-related operations. These lie mostly to the south and west of Randfontein and include the local municipality of Randfontein. Although the areas are dominated by the mining industry, there is potential for intensive farming activities, which could diversify the economic base in the area. Covering areas located mainly east of Randfontein is an area largely characterised by extensive agricultural units, interspersed with low order nodes usually characterised by the presence of farm schools, low order commercial activities and mobile clinic points.



19

E. IDP AND WSDP GOALS AND INTEGRATION The Randfontein IDP 2006 has been completed and is available on the Randfontein Municipality’s web-site. The IDP has been drafted in accordance with prescribed frameworks, which are as set out in the overview as in the document. Accordingly, the IDP Process Overview sets out the requirement for integration and recognises the role of the sectoral plans in drafting the integrated plan. The role of the RLM, the West Rand District Municipality and the provincial government is discussed, along with other institutions, interest groups and the community. Institutional arrangements regarding the various bodies, the officials, committees, Council, etc. are discussed. According to requirements, a Process Plan is included. Various actions pertaining to the water services sector are listed in the Process Plan, e.g.: • Sectoral inputs on the analysis phase, • Sectoral prioritization of needs, • Alignment to Provincial and National priorities, • Linking priorities identified and strategies developed, • Linking priorities identified and the budget, • Proposed Projects analysis & linking these to the Performance Management System, and • Review of sectoral plans. Generic items of integrated approach are also included, e.g. public participation, steering committee meetings, communication, etc. Time frames are attached to all elements of the Process Plan. The IDP discusses its main thrusts in a separate section, starting with the Council Vision, Mission and Core Values.

Vision The Randfontein Local Municipality will build a united community that provides a better life for all. Mission The accelerated provision of effective, efficient, quality services through partnership. Core values Commitment and teamwork, Integrity, honesty and respect, Accountability and transparency, Participation and empowerment, Learning and development, Equity. Core objectives The following core objectives are stated in the IDP: • Improved community participation • Efficient and effective service delivery • Creating democratic and accountable government • Customer care • Job creation and local economic development • Alleviation of poverty and under development • Safety and security in communities • Fight the spread of HIV/AIDS



20

In the next section of the IDP, the situational analysis describes the Provincial perspective, as well as the regional West Rand perspective in detail. The detail is not repeated here as the IDP is readily available and well-documented.

The Gauteng Integrated Development Plan (GIDP) in 2003 stated that, “Our plan, which focuses on sustainable economic growth and job creation, poverty alleviation, quality service delivery and good governance, remains the guiding torch in our march to a better life”. The Provincial government’s “Plan” intends to meet the challenges facing the people of Gauteng by: • Creating sustainable communities by developing new integrated housing projects, • Providing basic services such as water and sanitation, and • Implementing measures to protect the environment. Whilst the regional thrusts do not explicitly identify water services as a priority focus area, the importance of water service is contained within the broader approach of efficient and equitable service provision to all, the developmental nature of the IDP and the importance of an environmentally sensitive approach. With the focus on affordable and quality housing, the provision of adequate and sustainable levels of water services is included. Consultation and public participation is discussed separately and in detail in the IDP. This consultative process was done in an integrated approach and included water services. Some of the feedback received was directly related to water services, and is contained and dealt with in the IDP. The strategies identified within the IDP include the WSDP and Water and Sanitation Master Plans. The WSDP requirements and the results of the previous master plans are also catalogued and discussed in the document. As mentioned before, the Housing Delivery Plan contains the relevant requirements of provision of water services. In the discussion of the Integrated Environmental Strategy, the “Protection and preservation of wetlands, sensitive habitats and ecosystems”, and the “Protection and upgrading of catchment areas”, are mentioned. The IDP illustrates its integrated approach, leading to action, with the description of projects and programmes until 2011. The relevant section regarding Civil Engineering contains mostly water services related entries, with detailed targets regarding the one, two and three year targets. Other targets affecting water services are contained in the targets relating to financial services, the environment, housing and institutional arrangements. It is therefore the conclusion that the WSDP complies with the relevant requirements of the Water Services Act, as the WSDP is considered as part of the IDP process, with the WSDP as the sectoral plan for water services, falling within the inter-sectoral umbrella plan of the IDP. The WSDP and the Integrated Development Plan inform each other. The elements of this WSDP containing the specifics regarding Water Services, Integrated Water Resource Management and Institutional Arrangements, further contain the sub-goals related to these.



21

F. WATER SERVICES BUSINESS ELEMENTS

1. SOCIO ECONOMIC PROFILE

1.1 Demographics 1.1.1 Situation Assessment (Demographics)

During 2005, the Randfontein Municipality recognized the need for a Socio-Economic Survey, as very little useful information existed in this regard. A draft was prepared to undertake such a survey, but no known results are available as yet. The information detailed below is derived from broader data, typically from West Rand District Municipality level, as well as 2001 Census data. In many cases, figures had to be compared, extrapolated and estimated due to discrepancies, inaccuracies and variations between the sources. Yet, it is believed that the information is of sufficient accuracy for interpretation in a broader planning environment, i.e. as in this WSDP.

1.1.1.1 Current Consumer Profile

The following information for Randfontein has been extracted from the 2001 Census information.

Data Source: Statistics South Africa – 2001

Randfontein

Area (km2) 477,4

Total population 128 842

Households 40 471

Persons / household 3,2

Total labour force (15-65 years) 92 070

Age Randfontein

Children (0-19) 43 166

Youth (20-34) 38 216

Middle Age (35-64) 42 375

Elderly (Over 65) 5 075

Total 128 832 Education Level Randfontein

None 13 229

Primary 35 017

Secondary 39 319

Matric 23 164

Tertiary 6 048

Certificate/diploma without Gr12 631

Higher degree 201

Unspecified 11 234

Total 128 843



22

Status Randfontein

Employed 41 453

Unemployed 23 381

Total Labour Force 64 834


Dependency 3,1

Income Category Randfontein

No income 77 225

R1-R400 6 014

R401-R800 11 876

R801-R1 600 11 745

R1 601-R3 200 10 296

R3 201-R6 400 7 048

R6 401-R12 800 3 354

R12 801-R25 600 840

R25 601-R51 200 211

R51 201-R102 400 103

R102 401-R204 800 103

Over R204801 24

Total 128 839

Based on the 1996 Census information, the population of Randfontein was 107,771 persons belonging to 27,450 households. The Integrated Development Plan for Randfontein anticipated that population will increase at an annual growth rate of 1.5%.

Escalating the 1996 figures to get a figure for the 2006/7 year gives a population of 125 000, living in 31 800 households. The 2001 Census figures (above) seem to be excessive, especially the number of households of 40 471. The population figure is accepted as a base figure for this report, to ensure consistency with various other information figures quoted from the same source. The IDP 2006 quotes the number of households billed as 28 000, which compares well with the projected figures above.

The figures concerning the number of households differ greatly from those as generated during the last Water Master Plan (2003), where the latest Treasury database figures were used. These figures are shown below. Total Population – 128 842 (Census 2001) No of household consumer units – 17 840 occupied erven

15 934 occupied residential erven 139 erven vacant

19 304 water meters No of dry industrial consumer units - There are 89 industrial erven. The number and split between wet and dry is unknown. There are 47 large users. No of commercial consumer units - There are 607 business users. No other (“institutional, irrigation, municipal use etc.”) - There are 174 other users (86 educational, 88 governmental).



23

It is expected that the updated figures that will be produced with the new master plans will compare better with the total number of households based around 28 000.

1.1.1.2 Poor household definition

The Randfontein Local Municipality has a developmental focus. There is a huge housing backlog (± 15 000 units) and existing residential areas are fragmented by nature. Proposals based on this developmental focus are discussed in the Spatial Development Strategy of 2004 (SDS). Of significance for water services provision is:

• Development of smaller areas within the existing urban areas which could be used for

higher density infill development (social housing); • A focus on affordable- to medium income housing development which should make

provision for the people’s housing process and the social housing process; • Housing developments must be subject to geo-technical and environmental investigations; • Development should not contribute to urban sprawl; • Developments would be subject to feasibility studies.

The current urban edge would have to be revised to allow for adequate housing provision. With the high unemployment rate in Randfontein, it is important that economic catalyst projects be initiated which will revive the economic situation in Randfontein. Examples are mentioned in the SDS, which include some Agri-industries and development of tourist facilities such as Riebeeck Lake. Intensive agriculture is primarily situated along the Wonderfonteinspruit. Some economic opportunity is proposed to benefit currently unemployed, disadvantaged beneficiaries to become involved with subsistence urban agriculture. The identified land must be obtained through the Municipal Commonage Programme of the Department of Land Affairs, whereafter the land could be sublet by the Municipality to individual beneficiaries. The current definition of poor households in RLM is defined by the Indigent Policy. Accordingly, indigents are defined as those households, who, owing to a number of factors, are unable to make monetary contributions towards basic services. Households whose monthly incomes are equal to or less than the equivalent of two state old-age pensions or households that are wholly dependant on old age pensions and state grants. The IDP describes Indigency as households with a total income of less that R 1500 per month. There is an estimated indigent population of 3336 in the area.

1.1.1.3 Present population and projected population growth rates

As shown in 1.1.2.2 below, the total population according to the Census 2001 is 128,842 and the projected population growth rate is 3.6%. Information regarding current growth rates for smaller entities is not available. During the previous Water Master Planning process, a growth rate of 1.5% was assumed. The potential for development of additional residential properties, as set out below, was based on this assumption. The total number of additional erven was estimated at 9922, as detailed below. To ensure better planning, the current growth rate should be more realistically established.

Additional erven: • Mohlakeng Ext 7 & 8 - 800 • Mohlakeng Ext 3 & 5 - 2014 • Mohlakeng Hostels - 640



24 • Toekomsrus erf 2463 - 512 • Toekomsrus erf 1583 - 238 • Badirile – 785 • Finsbury Ext - 107 • Peacehaven - 800 • Droogeheuvel – 3714 • Middelvlei – 3593*

* Inhabitants of Zenzele relocates tp Middelvlei

The figures below indicate the Income Category and Employment Status as per the Census 2001.

Status Randfontein Percentage

Employed 41 453 63.9% of labour force

Unemployed 23 381 36.1% of labour force

Total Labour Force 64 834 50.3% of population


Dependency 3,1

Income Category Randfontein Percentage Category Cumulative

No income 77 225 59.9 59.9

R1-R400 6 014 4.7 64.6

R401-R800 11 876 9.2 73.8

R801-R1 600 11 745 9.1 82.9

R1 601-R3 200 10 296 8.0 90.9

R3 201-R6 400 7 048 5.5 96.4

R6 401-R12 800 3 354 2.6 99.0

R12 801-R25 600 840 0.7 99.7

R25 601-R51 200 211 0.2 99.8

R51 201-R102 400 103 0.1 99.9

R102 401-R204 800 103 0.1 100.0

Over R204801 24 0.0 100.0

Total 128 839

As can be seen, a very high percentage of the population has no income (59.9%), or lives below the poverty line (82.9% with less than R1600.00 per month). This figure of course includes those individuals who are not included in the labour force (children, aged, etc.). Yet, with the labour force approximately 50% of the population (and presupposing a linear distribution), a very high proportion of the population still lives in conditions of poverty (41.5%). The comparative figure for the previous WSDP was 36%. One could come to the conclusion that this indicates an improvement in the situation, but given the accuracy and variety of sources of information, such a conclusion would not necessarily prove to be correct. The formal Socio-Economic Survey would provide more accurate figures.



25

Given the scale of the problem, it would be reasonable to accept that a large portion of the community would not be able to afford to pay for water services. Randfontein is a predominantly mining-industry driven area with a lack of diversified economic conditions and poor accessibility. Land ownership is mostly vested with the mining industry and private ownership, with large agricultural areas. Due to huge housing backlogs and a prevalence of an unemployed labour force, these elements will drive the need for specific development.

1.1.1.4 Demographic trends and migration patterns

Very little information is available regarding migration patterns to the area. There seems to be a need for improved daily migration of the labour force, as it is recommended in the SDF that the Randfontein/Naledi Rail Link should be investigated and implemented, and the Station Street Taxi internodal transfer facility should be upgraded. Yet, it is also indicated that, at the Randfontein station the amenities are generally in a good condition and the service frequency on the Randfontein – Johannesburg service is about 15 – 20 minutes in the peak hour and peak period respectively. Regarding permanent migration to the area, the table below indicates migration patters as observed during 2002. As discussed earlier, a proper Socio-Economic Survey is required to provide quality up-to-date information in this regard.

Source – WRDM IDP, March 2002

AREA RANDFONTEIN LM

RSA 104 702

SADC Countries 1 631

Rest of Africa 26

Europe 143

Asia 1

North America 0

Central / South America 15

Australia / New Zealand 1

Other 27

Unspecified 111

1.1.1.5 Age and gender Profile

The age profile for the area is shown below (Census 2001 data).

Age Randfontein

Children

(0-19) 43 119

Youth

(20-34) 38 216

Middle Age (35-64) 42 375

Elderly (Over 65) 5 085

Total 128 842



26

• The total permanent population is 128,842 • There are 5,085 residents over the age of 65 (3.95%). • The distribution of the youth under 18 years of age is unknown. The Census 2001 figures

indicate youth younger than 14 years of age, of which there are 32219 (or 25%). According to the WRDM SDF, there are 43119 children under the age of 19 years (33.4%).

• The Male/Female distribution in the area is 50.37%/49.63 %, equating to 64895 male residents and 63945 female residents.

1.1.2 Future Trends and Goals (Demographics) 1.1.2.1 Consumer Profile

The future consumer profile is currently under review and updated information will be available after the master plans have been updated.

1.1.2.2 Population and projected population growth rates

The total population according to the Census 2001 is 128842. The projected population growth rate is 3.6%.

1.1.2.3 Demographic trends and migration patterns

Randfontein LM, which is situated to the south west of Mogale city, is also linked to Mogale City. Some form of spatial separation exists because of mining activities. However, low income residential development in Mogale City is expanding in a south-westerly direction towards Randfontein, but is being stopped or contained by large areas of mining land and related activities. Within these two urban concentration points, densification and infill need to take place. Developments are focused on low-income residential development, which are not driven by market forces, but by meeting basic needs of people. Attempts should be made to increase the accessibility of these areas to “open” these areas to increase accessibility and mobility. Specific attention should be given to the existing rail corridors and transport routes. The integration of land use and transportation planning has become increasingly important in the sustainable growth and development of these areas. Randfontein, because of its segregated urban form, need to consolidate the urban form - (SDF [WRDM]).

1.1.2.4 Age and gender Profile

The current age and profile for the area is shown above in 1.1.1.5 (Census 2001 data). There are no future projected figures available.

1.1.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Demographics)

The main gap, as relating to dealing with issues of demographics, is one of a lack of information and a lack of capacity to undertake proper planning for the future needs. Organizational issues affect planning, due to a shortage of staff and skills (those who have the skills are over-utilized). Due to these shortages, all studies must be done via consultants, which assists in ascertaining what needs to be done, but does not resolve the problem of non-implementation due to lack of capacity, For its future projections, RLM is dependent on Statistics SA and WRDM studies.



27 1.1.4 Implementation Strategies (Demographics)

The problems and gaps as mentioned above are mostly based on capacity needs. These should be addressed if any improvement in service delivery is to be possible. It is unlikely that this will be possible unilaterally by the Municipality, and certainly not by the engineering department on their own. In terms of delivering the services as required, according to the 2003 WMP, the total water demand was 20 540 kl/d. This is estimated to grow to 29 098 kl/d, which includes 7 819 kl/d for future developments. This also includes meeting the basic water services of 6 kl to all. The master plan is currently under review and these estimates will be updated shortly. The municipality plans to meet these needs in the course of its functions. Also i.t.o. sanitation, the master plan proposals will be put forward for implementation. Actual implementation will depend on budget allocations received. There is a risk of non-implementation due to the dependence on external funding. Currently the following strategic interventions are being investigated and undertaken:

• A Socio-Economic Survey of Randfontein – funding sought. • An Incentive policy to boost development in the Aureus industrial area. • Compilation of a Local Economic Development Strategy – funding sought. • Establishment of a Project Management Unit. • The Inner City Rejuvenation Programme. • Establishment of a Labour Desk • The Riebeeck Lake Rejuvenation Project • Business Hives in Mohlakeng – funding sought. • The Ramosa Hall MPCC • A One-Stop Advisory and Manufacturing Centre • The appointment qualified staff in key positions should be implemented

1.2 Health

1.2.1 Situation Assessment (Health) 1.2.1.1 Health Profile

There are 10 clinics in the Randfontein area, based in Randfontein, Toekomsrus, Mohlakeng, Randgate, Kocksoord, Badirile and Zenzele. The clinics are readily accessible to the residents. There are sufficient quantities of piped water of good quality available, as well as sufficient access to waterborne and chemical sanitation facilities. There is no prevalence of water-borne diseases. The Health Department considers that there is a perpetual potential risk of Cholera in informal areas, and this threat is therefore monitored on a continuous basis.

1.2.2 Future Trends and Goals (Health) 1.2.2.1 Health Profile

The aim of the Health Department is to provide a comprehensive Public Health Care service.



28 1.2.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Health)

It has been identified in the RLM IDP that there is a need for more clinics.

1.2.4 Implementation Strategies (Health)

The Health Department is currently planning to undertake Bacteriological Sampling of the water resources of the area. It also plans to perform a State of the Environment Report for Randfontein.

1.3 Employment and Income

1.3.1 Situation Assessment (Employment and Income) 1.3.1.1 Employment Profile

As was shown earlier, the following information is available regarding the employment status in the area. No more detailed information regarding permanent vs. seasonal workers, or breakdown of the information per industry, is known.

Status Randfontein

Employed 41 453

Unemployed 23 381

Total Labour Force 64 834


Dependency 3,1

1.3.1.2 Household income

The income categories for the area are as shown in the table below.

Income Category Randfontein

No income 77 225

R1-R400 6 014

R401-R800 11 876

R801-R1 600 11 745

R1 601-R3 200 10 296

R3 201-R6 400 11 683

Total 128 839

The indicators for the affordability of water and wastewater services, average water bills and the proportion to average income, is unknown.



29

1.3.2 Future Trends and Goals (Employment and Income) There is no information available regarding the future trends and goals (employment and income).

1.3.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Employment and Income) There is no information available regarding the strategic gap analysis (employment and income).

1.3.4 Implementation Strategies (Employment and Income)

There is no information available regarding implementation strategies (employment and income).

1.4 Economics

1.4.1 Situation Assessment (Economics) 1.4.1.1 Economic sectors, GGP contribution and employment

The table below shows the Economic Profile & Employment by Sector for Randfontein. Data Source: Statistics South Africa – 2001

Sector Randfontein

Agriculture 2 382

Mining 4 171

Manufacturing 5 734

Electricity, Gas & Water Supply 187

Construction 2 300

Wholesale & Retail Trade 6 369

Transport & Communication 1 823

Financial & Business 3 762

Community & Social services 7 101

Other 0

Private Households 4 333

Undetermined 3 293

N/A 50 592

Total 92 047



30 The Gross Domestic Product per Economic Sector for Randfontein (at 2002 prices) is shown in the table below. SECTOR RANDFONTEIN

Agriculture and Forestry 64

Mining 1 691

Manufacturing 604

Electricity and Water 12

Construction 86

Trade and Retail 407

Transport and Communication 241

Fin & Business Services 573

Community Services 389

Total 4 066

The Table below indicates the sectoral contribution to Gauteng’s production (figures for the WRDM region, which includes Randfontein)

Sector Contribution

1. Mining 78,3%

2. Agriculture 16,3%

3. Manufacturing 3,8%

4. Trade 3,6%

5. Construction 3,4%

6. Community services 3,3%

7. Transport 2,8%

8. Electricity 2,7%

9. Financial services 2,1%

Randfontein’s contribution to the district GGP is shown below, mostly through the sectors as indicated.

Randfontein 18,2% Mining, Manufacturing and Finance

1.4.1.2 Economic trends

No information is currently available regarding the effect of economic development initiatives, land reform, poverty relief and other socio-economic restructuring programs in the area.



31

1.4.2 Future Trends and Goals (Economics) There is no information available regarding future trends and goals (economics).

1.4.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Economics)

There is no information available regarding the strategic gap analysis (economics).

1.4.4 Implementation Strategies (Economics)

There is no information available regarding implementation strategies (economics).

2. SERVICE LEVEL PROFILE 2.1 Residential Consumer Units

It is the policy of the municipality to provide waterborne sanitation and on-site (house) connections to all its consumers even though there are consumers who are currently using septic tanks (e.g., Agricultural holdings) and boreholes. However, the long-term financial implications of this policy may prevent realisation of all the projects. With regard to water supply, the provision of on-site connections to all low-income households is likely to be financially possible, providing consumption levels are kept low, as poor consumers receive a subsidy for consumption of up to 6kl a month. (This is based on the assumption that the subsidy levels are sustainable at numbers of approximately R1.5 million per annum). However, the real problem arises with those poorer consumers using more than 6kl a month which, based on the evidence from the frequency distribution of consumption, is common. Taking a consumer using 15kl/month, the charge in 2001/02 would have been R61.59 per month less the subsidy of R12.42, which comes to R49 a month. This is unlikely to be affordable to a household earning R1 500 per month. This issue of affordability is dealt with further below. The provision of waterborne sanitation to all households is potentially problematic for the following reasons:

• The provision of waterborne sanitation increases water consumption, raising the water

supply bills of low-income consumers. • Waterborne sanitation is costly (in 2001/02 it already required a payment of R33.75 a

month for those living on small plots).

The policy does however provide for waterborne sanitation to be provided to all permanent housing areas.

2.1.1 Situation Assessment (Residential Consumer Units) 2.1.1.1 Residential Consumer Units for Water and Sanitation: Level of services

The information contained in the table below is based on the information as provided in Chapter 1, where the estimated total population was shown to be 128 842, with services provided to 17 840 consumer units (erven).



32 The services, as indicated in the table as Below RDP level, are of the services that are provided to some informal settlements. There are an estimated total of 2830 informal dwellings, housing approximately 18100 people. Services provided to roughly one third of these consumers are below the RDP standard, with two thirds (± 11300 people) receiving services above RDP level.

Above RDP Below RDP Total

below Def 25l / c / d 0 – 10l/c/ d Pop 122042 6800 unknown

Quantity

% 94.7 5.3 unknown Def 0 - 200 200 - 500 >500 Pop 122042 6800 unknown

Distance

% 94.7 5.3 unknown Def 98% of time <98% Pop 128842 0 unknown

Availability

% 100 unknown Def 10l / min <10l / min Pop 122042 6800 unknown

Flow/ Assurance

% 94.7 5.3 unknown Def Pop 128842 0 unknown

Quality

% 100 unknown 2.1.1.2 Residential Consumer Units for Water

The information that is available is shown in the table below. Only “urban” information is currently available. There are 19304 water meters in total.

No. Consumer units with: Urban Rural:

Dense Rural: Village

Rural: Scattered

Rural: Farmland

1. None or inadequate 139 1053* 2. Communal water supply 1777* 3. Controlled volume supply 4. Uncontrolled volume supply:

yard tap or house connection 17840

5. Total Served (2+3+4) 17840 6. Total (1+5) 17979

* Informal settlements

2.1.1.3 Residential Consumer Units for Sanitation

The information that is available is shown in the table below. No. Consumer units with: Urban Rural:

Dense Rural: Village

Rural: Scattered

Rural: Farmland

1. None or inadequate: Below RDP: Pit 2 366 687 2. None or inadequate: Below RDP: Bucket 3. Consumer installations: On Site dry or

equivalent, including VIP toilets, USD, composting system

92 Unknown

4. Consumer installations: Wet (Septic tank, digester or tanker de-sludge or effluent discharge to an oxidation pond etc.)

1 974

718 5. Discharge to sewer treatment works

(intermediate or full waterborne) 18 165

6. Total Served (3+4+5) 18 165 2 066 718 7. Total (1+2+6) 20 531 2 753 718



33 2.1.1.4 Grey Water Management

Dry sanitation systems are not provided in informal settlements. Grey water is not specifically managed. Disposal of grey water generally occurs on an open area in the vicinity of the dwelling or on garden/vegetable patches.

2.1.1.5 Pit emptying and sludge disposal

There are currently no specific plans for pit emptying and sludge disposal for VIP toilets installed in dense settlements. The policy is to provide waterborne sewerage disposal in formal settlements. In informal settlements, interim services are provided.

2.1.2 Future Trends and Goals (Residential Consumer Units)

The future service provision strategy has been incorporated in the WSDP as follows: For the urban periphery, the municipality is to undertake a survey of households without basic services in these areas in order to undertake proper planning. For the urban areas, current planning indicates that the backlog will be partly accommodated in the future development of housing areas to accommodate residents currently in Zenzele, through the provision of stand pipes with full waterborne sanitation. The current policy of the local authority is to eventually extend full services to these households. For the purposes of the financial modelling of this service delivery programme, a period of five years was assumed for the upgrading of consumers with service levels currently below the target and provision of services to those currently without. The service provision to informal areas will not be formalized at these sites. Resolution will be by means of addressing the housing situation and relocating residents to developed residential areas.

2.1.2.1 Residential Consumer Units for Water & Sanitation: Level of service

It has been indicated in the previous Master Plan that the potential future development will imply services required at 27900 erven in total. Randfontein intends to provide a full level of service for both water and sanitation in all new township developments. Townships currently under development: Mohlakeng Ext 3: 338 Stands Mohlakeng Ext 7: 606 Stands Mohlakeng Ext 8: 157 Stands Future Townships: Badirile: 711 Stands Droogeheuvel: 3714 Stands (3650 Residential) Middelvlei: 3593 Stands (3498 Residential)

2.1.2.2 Residential Consumer Units for Water

Densification in formal urban areas is contributing to a point at which there is a risk that demand will exceed the ability to supply. This risk will have to be managed together with the provision of supply to areas newly developed. The Master Planning process should take cognisance of this fact.



34 2.1.2.3 Residential Consumer Units for Sanitation

Despite rapid densification, some spare capacity at the existing waste water treatment works (WWTW) still exist, mainly due to Randfontein discharging part of its effluent (±7Ml/day) to Westonaria. Upgrading /retrofitting will however need to be done due to the age of the Works and potential development currently being considered by various developers.

2.1.2.4 Grey Water Management

There is no planning for the future management of grey water. 2.1.2.5 Pit emptying and sludge disposal

Randfontein, with the Department of Housing, plans to develop two new urban townships (Middelvlei and Droogeheuvel) that are estimated to have sufficient capacity to accommodate all qualifying residents in current informal settlements. It is anticipated that these townships can be completed within the next 5 years. In addition to the above planned townships, a rural township (Badirile) is planned with the Department of Housing to accommodate beneficiaries in the area. Bulk water supply tenders have already been awarded and it is expected that the Department of Housing will finalise tenders for the installation of internal services within the near future. Randfontein recently acquired a new vacuum tanker to assist Agricultural Holdings and farms with a pit emptying service. Utilisation at present is low due to private operators also offering the service. Awareness that the Local Authority also offers the service needs to be addressed. Also see as already described in the current situation assessment. Septic tanks primarily occur on Agricultural Holdings and farms. Council does not provide any service in this regard since it is essentially considered to be part of the domestic installation, the operation and maintenance of which is the responsibility of the owner/occupier.

2.1.2.6 Types of sanitation technology options

Only a full level of service is considered due to the urban nature of Randfontein. Recent attempts to implement a pour flush sanitation system in Mohlakeng Ext 3 failed due to violent opposition from adjoining Mohlakeng community.

2.1.2.7 2010 target for basic sanitation

The current projects allow for the upgrading of the bulk system and implementation of reticulation in the Mohlakeng townships. Considering the technical backlog of 12,8% (or approximately 3000 consumer units), it seems possible that the backlog will be addressed through relocation of residents in the informal areas of Zenzele to this area. Through the nature of growth and the effect of migration, some new “backlog” is bound to exist in 2010, which should be acknowledged and which will always be present. Therefore some provision for infrastructure expansion would be required on an ongoing basis.

2.1.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Residential Consumer Units)

The infrastructure costs for the provision of waterborne sanitation are high, for both internal and connector services, which imply the need for borrowing and associated capital charges. Similarly, wastewater treatment works (WWTW), pump stations and outfall sewers are expensive, and the required capacity expansion may lead to the service provider passing on these higher costs to the local authority.



35 The financial viability of the service depends on the extent of cross-subsidisation possible within the water and sanitation trading account; and on the availability of grant finance for capacity expansion, and inter-government grants to help pay for the service to poor households. Although not necessarily viable financially, in terms of income generation, the lowest level of service for Gauteng Province is considered to be a full level of service, including waterborne sanitation, and is thus provided accordingly As can be seen, the biggest strategic gap remains one of capacity and resources, both financial and human. In order to implement a bulk water supply and bulk sanitation system for Middelvlei and Droogeheuvel a capital investment of ± R38m is required. This funding has already been sourced through MIG. However, current annual MIG allocations are in the order of between R10m and R15m, which is insufficient, especially when taking into account that current projects, funded from the same source, are presently in an implementation phase.

2.1.4 Implementation Strategies (Residential Consumer Units)

The following strategies have been defined:

Urban periphery • Provide basic water supply and basic sanitation, as defined according to the Act, to all

consumers taking cognisance of the physical, social and financial constraints as set out in the Act.

Urban or developed areas • The current backlog of consumer units with none or inadequate services will be upgraded

to a full service level (metered on-site water and waterborne sanitation) over a 5-year period subject to the availability of funding. Informal households occupying land illegally, will be relocated to serviced sites.

• The status quo of current consumer units with yard taps will be retained. • All new consumer units will be provided with metered on-site water and waterborne

sanitation of sufficient quality and quantity as required by the Act. • If the above is not financially viable, then the period to upgrade the backlog should be

extended or the tariffs structure should be adjusted. • If reasonable proposals still cannot provide a sustainable financial situation, only then

should a lower service level be investigated for new consumer units.

The local authority intends to provide on-site water with ultimately full waterborne sanitation to all households within its area of jurisdiction. Current projects have been planned with this aim in mind. It is also the intention of Randfontein Local Municipality to be efficient and effective in service provision. The following strategies and objectives apply:

a) Provide the highest level of service from the onset, instead of first providing a lower level

to all and having to repeat work later when upgrading. b) All consumers should have the same level of service, i.e. sufficient volume must be

available to all consumers.



36 c) Every stand should be provided with potable, accessible metered water. However, the

backlog of approximately 1000 households with none or rudimentary water services, needs to be provided for, with standpipes not further than 200 m away and not more that 200 people for each standpipe. Also, approximately 1900 of the 2900 households currently served through communal standpipes, will be upgraded to an intermediate service level (yard taps) in the next 5 years.

d) Every stand should have a waterborne sewerage connection. However, interim measures

e.g. in the form of septic tanks, need to be provided for the approximately 2900 households with none or rudimentary sanitation services.

As stated above, the final decision on service levels can only be made based on a financial analysis to assess the viability of the water and sanitation services, dealing with future costs and future revenue options. For the rural areas The rural areas are served by utilizing groundwater through private boreholes and septic and conservancy tank systems. The utilization and potential pollution of groundwater should be addressed in a comprehensive study, at least on District level. The provision of adequate sanitation to especially the labourers in the rural areas should also be addressed.

2.2 Public Institutions and ‘dry’ industries

2.2.1 Situation Assessment (Public Institutions and ‘dry’ industries)

2.2.1.1 Public Institutions and ‘dry’ industries

Only information as available is provided below.

No. Of consumer units with access to: Public amenities consumer types

Type No. Of consumer units

None or inadequate

Communal supply

Controlled volume supply

Uncontrolled volume supply

Urban 120 x Police Stations (Gov – all) Rural

Urban Magistrate offices Rural

Urban 626 x Businesses Rural Urban 97 “Dry”

Industries Rural Urban Office

Buildings Rural Urban Garages Rural Urban Prisons Rural Urban 88 x Schools Rural Urban Hospitals Rural Urban Clinics Rural

Crèches Urban



37 Rural Urban 922 x Other (Specify) Rural Urban Total Rural

Resources available to perform function:

Yes No N/A Comment Is there budget? Yes Are there By-laws? Yes Presently being reviewed Is there infrastructure? Yes Limited to urban context Personnel available? No Appointment of personnel

limited by budget constraints 2.2.2 Future Trends And Goals (Public Institutions and ‘dry’ industries) 2.2.2.1 Public Institutions and ‘dry’ industries

Planning for public institutions and “dry" industries are included in the overall planning, strategies and implementation plans. The discussions under Residential Consumer Units should be read to include these. Expansion of industries is generally considered concurrently with conservation and quality control measures. Individual interviews with respective industries are recommended to determine future plans for expansion to estimate future water demand.

2.2.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Public Institutions and ‘dry’ industries)

See comment in 2.2.2. above. 2.2.4 Implementation Strategies (Public Institutions and ‘dry’ industries)

See comment in 2.2.2. above. 2.3 Wet Industries

2.3.1 Situation Assessment (Wet industries) 2.3.1.1 Wet Industries: Urban and Rural

There is no information available regarding “wet” vs. “dry” industries. The information provided under the heading for “dry” industries above, include all industries. There are 47 industries considered to be “large” industries.

Water Quality

List Individual “wet Industries

Monthly Water

use (kl) Pressure

(kPa) Raw Filtered Chlorinated Fully Treated

Reliability (inadequate adequate,

special treatment)

Billing system (none flat rate

metered)

Unavailable Total



38 Resources available to perform function:

Yes No N/A Comment

Is there budget? Yes Are there By-laws? Yes Is there infrastructure? Yes Personnel available? Yes Monitoring function

outsourced 2.3.2 Future Trends and Goals (Wet industries) 2.3.2.1 Wet Industries: Urban and rural

See comment as provided under “dry” industries.

2.3.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Wet industries)

See comment as provided under “dry” industries. 2.3.4 Implementation Strategies (Wet industries)

See comment as provided under “dry” industries.

2.4 ‘Raw’ Water Consumers

2.4.1 Situation Assessment (‘Raw’ Water Consumers) Randfontein Local Municipality does not utilise underground or stored water to supplement its requirements. Water requirements are met by the provider, Rand Water. Agricultural holdings and farms primarily depend on underground water. Unfortunately, no statistics on usage is available to assist in determining whether utilisation is done optimally. The Randfontein Local Municipality operates on the assumption that the National Government is the custodian of water resources in terms of the National Water Act, hence funding should be forthcoming for implementation and management of measures to exercise the recording, monitoring and control of these resources, should this be expected from Council. An estimated 1931 holdings and 781 farms/portions of farms are dependent on underground water. The lack of coordination in terms of the issuing of water permits between Local Authorities and DWAF is considered to be an issue, especially where changes in land-use occurs, from agricultural to other uses.

2.4.1.1 ‘Raw’ Water Consumers: Urban and Rural

There is insufficient information available in this category. 2.4.2 Future Trends and Goals (‘Raw’ Water Consumers) 2.4.2.1 ‘Raw’ Water Consumers: Urban and Rural

There is no information available in this category.



39 2.4.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (‘Raw’ Water Consumers)

There is no information available in this category. 2.4.4 Implementation Strategies (‘Raw’ Water Consumers)

There is no information available in this category.

2.5 Industrial Consumer Units

2.5.1 Situation Assessment (Industrial Consumer Units) 2.5.1.1 Industrial Consumer Units for Sanitation: Urban and Rural

Industrial consumers typically discharge directly to treatment works and do not have intermediate options, as is the case for residential consumers.

Industry

Number of

service units

Monthly waste

water (kl)

Monthly Sewage

(kl)

Washing leaches through storm water

system (kl)

Total Treated

effluent (kl)

Total Untreated

effluent (kl)

Total Return flow

to river system (kl)

Total 95 4410 included 4410

2.5.2 Future Trends and Goals (Industrial Consumer Units)

Regarding the future trends, strategic gaps and implementation strategies, these are similar as discussed for residential consumers, i.e. no specific analysis and planning at this level exists. A full service at standard levels of services are planned for and paid for by the consumer.

2.5.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Industrial Consumer Units)

See comments under 2.5.2 above. 2.5.4 Implementation Strategies (Industrial Consumer Units)

See comments under 2.5.2 above.

2.6 Industries and their permitted effluent releases

2.6.1 Situation Assessment (Industries and their permitted effluent releases) 2.6.1.1 Industries and their permitted effluent releases

Constituent 1 Constituent 2 Constituent 3 Name Name Name

Industry Permitted volume (MI/yr)

Permitted effluent quality (units)

Perm

itted

vo

lum

e

Con

cent

rati

on li

mit

Perm

itted

vo

lum

e

Con

cent

rati

on li

mit

Perm

itted

vo

lum

e

Con

cent

rati

on li

mit

Total



40 As per by-laws and Randfontein WWTW discharge effluent permit Not currently enforced

2.6.2 Future Trends and Goals (Industries and their permitted effluent releases)

As indicated in 2.5.2. above, regarding the future trends, strategic gaps and implementation strategies for industrial consumer units for sanitation, no specific analysis and planning at this level exists. Effluent is dealt with through the formalized systems, both at local and regional level.

2.6.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Industries and their permitted effluent releases)

See comments under 2.6.2 above. 2.6.4 Implementation Strategies (Industries and their permitted effluent releases)

See comments under 2.5.2 above.

3. WATER RESOURCE PROFILE 3.1 Water Source 3.1.1 Situation Assessment (Water Source) 3.1.1.1 Surface Water Source

The Randfontein Local Municipality does not utilize surface water as a water source for the area.

3.1.1.2 Groundwater Sources

Certain areas, mainly consisting of farms and agricultural holdings, are provided with water from boreholes. A comprehensive audit of these boreholes and an investigation, into the possibility to utilize ground water as a source for potable water, needs to be undertaken. The following informal settlements are served by borehole water, the borehole installations of which is operated and maintained by council: • Manganese, • Badirile, • Drowell.

Due to the township establishment initiatives, it is expected that reliance on groundwater in terms of existing informal settlements will be reduced to zero. However, past experience has shown that there could be a risk of migration of people from elsewhere, that could potentially occupy vacated shacks. No estimate can however be hazarded regarding the probability of such an event realizing, nor the potential effect thereof on groundwater requirements. As part of the housing process, the municipality should ensure that such occupation not take place.



41 3.1.1.3 Groundwater Monitoring

Yes No 1. What % of boreholes is regularly monitored for?

i) water levels x ii) water quality? x

2. Is the groundwater monitoring data regularly processed and reported on by a qualified hydro-geologist?

x

3.1.1.4 External Sources (where the WSA purchase water from others)

Record: Prior (Megaliters)

Nam

e

Con

trac

ted

supp

ly

volu

me

(Ml/y

ear)

Cur

rent

Add

ition

al

Req

uire

men

t at

Yea

r 5

2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

Rand Water

Supply contract under review

+35% on current requirements

8044,3 7925,6 7490,2 6952,9 8260,5

Randfontein acquires all its bulk water from Rand Water via three main connections at Cemetery Road, Randfontein and Randfontein North. It is delivered from these connection points to distribution reservoirs at Greenhills and Westergloor. At each distribution reservoir there is a water tower from which water is delivered into the distribution network. As was reported in the previous Water Master Plan, the total potable water demand of the Randfontein system is supplied from the Rand Water bulk supply system. There are three connections to the Rand Water system. The table below shows the characteristics of the Rand Water connections. Connection RW1 supplies the Greenhills reservoir and connections RW2 and RW3 supply the Westergloor reservoir. Rand Water connections to Randfontein

Connection Ground

level (m.asl)

Working pressure *

(m)

Maximum pressure *

(m) Water meter

(mm)

RW1 “Cemetery Road” 1 723 29 31 450 RW2 “Randfontein North” 1 713 40 41 450 RW3 “Randfontein” 1 713 40 41 200

* Variations in pressure for the different connection are discussed in the Master Plan.



42 3.1.1.5 Water returned to resources

Record: Prior

Sour

ce N

ame

Type

Perm

itted

am

ount

th

at c

an b

e re

turn

ed

(ml/y

ear)

Cur

rent

20

05/0

6

Add

ition

al

Req

uire

men

t at

Yea

r 5

2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

Elandsvlei Spruit

WWTW Effluent

8140 2850 0 2831,5 2512,1 2574,5 2115,2 2821,6

Westonaria WWTW

Effluent None Specified

84 84 82,2 84,8 Not Available

Not Available

Not Available

3.1.2 Future Trends And Goals (Water Source)

The development of Droogeheuvel and Badirile townships will both respectively require new connections to Rand Water’s supply. Subject to investigation an additional reservoir may be required at the Westergloor site to augment storage capacity for the Middelvlei development. This will be further investigated during the updating of the Master Plan.

3.1.2.1 Water Returned to resources

The construction of the Droogeheuvel and Middelvlei outfall sewers will substantially increase the discharge to the Hannes van Niekerk WWTW at Westonaria. It is however envisaged that a part of the Droogeheuvel development can discharge to the Randfontein WWTW. Upon completion of these outfall sewers, it is planned for Finsbury, Kocksoord and part of Aureus to discharge into this main outfall sewer. The impact of a possible reduction in inflow of these rerouted discharges on the Randfontein WWTW will have to be assessed taking the above into account.

3.1.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Water Source)

Current indications are that Rand Water will be able to supply future water demands. A need exists for a comprehensive borehole audit (urban and rural) to determine additional/alternative water sources.

3.1.4 Implementation Strategies (Water Source)

Implementation for future demand is as already discussed in 3.1.2. above. A borehole audit as mentioned above, is recommended in order to compile a groundwater database.



43 3.2 Water Quality 3.2.1 Situation Assessment (Water Quality)

Resources to provide water quality assessment functions

Resources available to perform function (Yes/ No/ N/A)

Budgets Bylaws Infrastructure Personnel 1. Quality of water taken from source: urban Yes No No Yes 2. Quality of water taken from source: rural Yes No No Yes 3. Reporting on quality of water taken from source: urban & rural N/A N/A Yes Yes 4. Quality of water returned to the resource: urban Yes Yes Yes Yes 5. Quality of water returned to the resource: rural N/A N/A N/A N/A 6. Pollution contingency measures No Yes No No

3.2.1.1 Quality of water taken from source: urban

Yes / No At Source At

Reservoir At tap

Is water quality measured? (Yes/no)

Yes Yes Yes No

1. Do you monitor it yourself? (Yes/no)

Yes No Yes No

2. If no, who does? RW RLM N/A 3. Monitoring intervals (daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, bi-annually, annually)

Weekly Quarterly N/A

4. Are these results available in electronic format? (Yes/no)

Yes No N/A

5. % Time (days) within SABS 241 standards per year

99% 99% N/A

3.2.1.2 Quality of water taken from source: rural

Yes /

No At Source At

Reservoir At tap

1. Is water quality measured? No No N/A No 2. Do you monitor it yourself? (Yes/no)

No No No

3. If no, who does? Quality only monitored on ad hoc basis 4. Monitoring intervals (daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, bi-annually, annually)

N/A N/A N/A

5. Are these results available in electronic format? (Yes/no)

No No No No

6. % Time (days) within SABS 241 standards per year

No data available



44 3.2.1.3 Reporting on quality of water taken from source: urban and rural

Yes/No Method of notification If quality of water taken from source does not comply, are urban residents notified?

Yes Media (Radio)

If quality of water taken from source does not comply, are rural residents notified?

No N/A

3.2.1.4 Quality of water returned to the resource: urban

Yes / No In the return effluent

In the Storm water In the River

1. Is water quality measured? (Yes/no)

Yes Yes No Yes


Yes Yes No Yes

3. If no, who does? Not monitored

4. Monitoring intervals (weekly, monthly, quarterly, bi-annually, annually)

Weekly N/A Monthly

5. Are these results available in electronic format?

Yes N/A Yes

6. For wastewater treatment works discharges to water resource: % time within requirements of special or general standards (Regulation 991).

10 N/A 50

3.2.1.5 Quality of water returned to the resource: rural

Yes / No In the return effluent

In the Storm water In the River

1. Is water quality measured? (Yes/no)

No N/A No N/A


No No No

3. If no, who does? Not Monitored 4. Monitoring intervals (weekly, monthly, quarterly, bi-annually, annually)

N/A N/A N/A

5. Are these results available in electronic format?

N/A N/A N/A

6. For wastewater treatment works discharges to water resource: % time within requirements of special or general standards (Regulation 991).

N/A N/A N/A



45 3.2.1.6 Pollution contingency measures

Resource description List potential source of

pollution Formal contingency measures (Yes/No)

Con Joubert Bird Park Nola No Union Park Continental Oil Mills /

Delmas Milling No

3.2.2 Future Trends and Goals (Water Quality)

Future goals are discussed in 3.2.4. below.

3.2.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Water Quality)

A water quality monitoring program is not currently in place.

3.2.4 Implementation Strategies (Water Quality)

Implementation of a water quality monitoring programme to comply with the stipulations of Regulation 5 of the Regulations under the Water Services Act (Act 108 of 1997) is planned for 2006/07.

3.3 Waterborne Sanitation

3.3.1 Situation Assessment (Waterborne Sanitation)

The municipality’s objective of providing full waterborne sanitation has been described in detail in Chapter 2, regarding current and future levels of service. All new townships are planned to be provided with waterborne sanitation. The municipality’s wastewater is currently treated at the Randfontein and Westonaria wastewater treatment works (WWTW). The wastewater flow from Mohlakeng is discharged into an outfall sewer, which leads to the Westonaria wastewater treatment works. The latest flow volumes are being analysed with the current revision of the Master Plan. The volumes as indicated below were for 2001/02, as per the previous master plans. The combined wastewater volume flowing to the Randfontein WWTW (4 497 Ml/yr) and to the Westonaria outfall (2 688 Ml/yr) amounted to 7 185 Ml for the 2001/02 year. This represents 136% of the 5 284 Ml of water used by consumers for the year. This is highly unusual, as normally wastewater flow is significantly less than the water use, as a substantial proportion of water used is normally not returned to the sewer. To some extent, this could be explained by ingress of stormwater into the sewers, which is unusually high. The largest contribution to this occurrence however, could be from consumers within Robin Park and Bhongweni, being supplied with water from the source by a mine and discharging their effluent in Randfontein’s system. With the master plans currently under review, updated figures re the above will be available shortly.

3.3.2 Future Trends and Goals (Waterborne Sanitation)

3.3.2.1 Waterborne sanitation

As mentioned earlier, the municipality’s objective of providing full waterborne sanitation has been described in detail in Chapter 2, regarding current and future levels of service.



46 3.3.3 Strategic Gap and Analysis (Waterborne Sanitation)

See comment in 3.3.2.1. above. There is an urgent need for an investigation into the causes and sources of stormwater ingress, as shown through the figures for suspected high levels of stormwater ingress as discussed above (3.3.1) As mention earlier in this chapter, a comprehensive audit of boreholes and an investigation into potable ground water sources needs to be undertaken. No records of abstraction from existing boreholes are available. A groundwater database has not been established. No ground water source information and future requirements are available.

3.3.4 Implementation Strategies (Waterborne Sanitation)

See comment in 3.3.2.1. above. Also, an investigation into causes and sources of stormwater ingress into the sewer systems needs to be undertaken. Application for funds for this project will be applied for through the budgeting processes. The results of such an investigation will determine future action required. Furthermore, the proposed investigation into the potential of ground water sources and the borehole audit should be done, which should include the establishment of the ground water database.

4. WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT INTERVENTIONS 4.1 Situation Assessment (Water Resource Management Interventions)

A large portion in the Randfontein service area consists of agricultural holdings, which have their own boreholes to supply them with water. Water supply to these areas seems to be sufficient and the municipality does not currently provide additional water to these areas. A few agricultural holdings do receive water from the water network system and have been included in the master planning analyses for the area.

There are approximately 17 840 occupied erven (with water use) and 139 vacant erven (with no water use) within the Randfontein water supply boundaries, according to the treasury database. The latest available annual average daily demand (AADD) figures for the total area (June 2002 to May 2003) is 20 540 kℓ/d as measured through the RW meters. The Master Planning analyses of the water sold to consumers indicate an AADD of 15 696 kℓ/d for the period up to May 2003, with an unaccounted-for-water of ± 4 844 kℓ/d, or 23,6%. There are a number of large consumers in Randfontein that use considerable amounts of water, with the five largest using 1 651kl/d, or 8,0%. There are 47 consumers with AADD of more than 15 kℓ/d, with a total AADD of ± 3 366 kℓ/d, or roughly 16,4% of the total water demand. This figure includes the five largest consumers mentioned earlier. Managing water demand has been identified as one of the critical challenges facing the Randfontein municipality. Some strategies for dealing with this challenge are suggested in later sections. These build on existing strategies, which the municipality has initiated, to manage the water demand and improve payment levels. Current strategies include:



47

• The installation of a management information system which has been completed, • The Engineering Department having taken full responsibility for the co-reading of meters at

bulk Rand Water points, to ensure accurate billing, • Improved credit control, to make people more aware of their consumption, leading to

reduced water demand.

All on-site connections are metered and are read every month by meter readers from the Engineering Department (for bulk water meters) and Treasury for the rest of the consumers. Meters are currently replaced as and when problems are reported. Resources to provide water resources management intervention

Resources available to perform function

(Yes/ No/ N/A)

Budgets Bylaws Infrastructure Personnel 1. Targets for reducing unaccounted for water and water inefficiencies (Ml/year: urban)

No Program as yet

2. Targets for reducing unaccounted for water and water inefficiencies (Ml/year: rural)

N/A N/A N/A N/A

3. Reducing high pressure for residential consumers: urban

Yes Yes Yes No

4. Reducing high pressure for residential consumers: rural

N/A N/A N/A N/A

5. Consumer/end-use demand management: public information and education programmes

No N/A Yes No

6. Leak and meter repair programmes: urban

No N/A Yes No

7. Leak and meter repair programmes: rural

N/A N/A N/A N/A

8. Working for water programmes N/A N/A N/A N/A 9. Conjunctive use of surface – and groundwater

N/A N/A N/A N/A

4.1.1 Targets for reducing unaccounted for water and water inefficiencies (Ml/year: urban)

During the previous master planning exercise, the system-wide UAW was determined at 23,6%. For calculation of theoretical and future demands, a conservative universal UAW of 25% was used. This UAW value was added to the theoretical future demand totals, to give the estimated future AADD, including UAW, for each suburb in Randfontein. While this value is used to plan for the adequate supply of water, targets should be established for reducing UAW. Strategies should be implemented to reduce UAW. As can be seen in Table 4.1.1 above, RLM does not have a programme in place to address this issue yet. As seen in the table, and mentioned elsewhere in this report, measures to improve are severely curbed mainly due to a lack of capacity, both in terms of staff and budget. Where budget is available, a shortage of staff limits the scope of interventions that can be undertaken.



48

Record: Prior

Cur

rent

20

05/0

6

Estim

ate

Ye

ar 5

2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

1. Reticulation leaks 605 200 646 340 2. Illegal connections 0 0 0 0 3. Un-metered connections 0 0 0 0 4. Internal plumbing leaks No Info 5. Total UAW (should equal physical water losses for urban reported in the water balance section)

23,6% (4844 kl/d)

4.1.2 Targets for reducing unaccounted for water and water inefficiencies (Ml/year: rural)

The RLM has no specific targets and programmes aimed at rural areas.

Record: Prior

Cur

rent

20

05/0

6

Estim

ate

Ye

ar 5

2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

1. Reticulation leaks N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2. Illegal connections N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 3. Un-metered connections N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4. Internal plumbing leaks N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5. Total UAW (should equal physical water losses for urban reported in the water balance section)

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

4.1.3 Reducing high pressures for residential consumers: urban

Record: Prior No of consumer units

with water supply pressure of:

Cur

rent

20

05/0

6 2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

Estim

ate

Ye

ar 5

Tota

l no

of

cons

umer

un

its

1. <300kPa 2396 2. 300 –600kPa 122266 3. 600 –900kPa 5120 4. >900kPa (>9Bar) 756 TOTAL 20538

A pressure management study has not been undertaken by RLM. Pressure reducing valves have been installed to reduce pressures in Mohlakeng Ext 4, Ext 5 and Zenzele. A project is currently underway to implement separate reservoir and tower zones respectively for Mohlakeng, as well as for Finsbury and Kocksoord/Peacehaven. A pipeline management and rehabilitation programme is not in place.



49 4.1.4 Reducing high pressures for residential consumers: rural

No specific information is available for “rural”.

4.1.5 Consumer/end-use demand management: public information and education programmes

No specific public information and education plans are currently underway. As discussed under 4.1.4, such programmes should be undertaken, targeted at all consumers.

Record: Prior

Cur

rent

20

05/0

6

Estim

ate

Year

5

2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

1. % Schools targeted by education programmes

0 100 0 0 0 0 0

2. % Consumers targeted by public information programmes

0 100 0 0 0 0 0

4.1.6 Leak and meter repair programmes: urban

Assistance programmes

As mentioned above, no specific repair programs are underway. There is a policy according to which meters are repaired on demand, but this is not a planned, systematic replacement programme. There is no programme for leak repair assistance.

Record: Prior

Number of consumer units to be targeted by:

Cur

rent

20

05/0

6

Estim

ate

Year

5

2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

1. Leak repair assistance programme

0 n.a. 0 0 0 0 0

2. Retro-fitting of water efficient toilets

0 No programme envisaged

3. Meter repair programme

- Meters replaced

244 500 237 349 231 290 361

There is a maintenance and replacement policy, whereby meters are repaired and/or replaced on receipt of work lists compiled by the meter readers. The WSA has no leak detection equipment available. A leak detection survey was partially done during 2005, but was limited due to budget availability.

4.1.7 Leak and meter repair programmes: rural

There is no specific rural program.



50 4.1.8 Working for Water Programme

No Working for Water project has been undertaken by RLM. 4.1.9 Conjunctive use of surface – and groundwater

RLM currently undertakes no projects for the conjunctive use of surface- and groundwater.

4.2 Future Trends and Goals (Water Resource Management Interventions)

As mentioned under the Status Quo section above, the RLM water services section suffers under a lack of resources. These include insufficient budget, but in some instances, where budget may still be available, a shortage of skilled staff prevents the provision of a service to a standard as would be striven for. Of a more technical nature, during the meter reading cycle, there is a problem of some faulty meters not being reported in time to be fixed before the next reading, which leads to water losses and increased levels of non-payment.

4.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Water Resource Management Interventions)

As is evident from the above, the strategic gap in terms of the implementation of Water Resource Management interventions is mostly due to the lack of resources. Only when this is adequately addressed, can the proper planning of other interventions (technical, educational) be undertaken and later implemented. For example, a programme for the replacement of water meters has been planned previously, but the municipality’s plans to implement this program, have suffered due to the lack of capacity (staff numbers) to manage the replacement programme.

4.4 Implementation Strategies (Water Resource Management Interventions)

Managing water demand has been identified as one of the critical challenges facing the Randfontein municipality. This needs to be addressed as a matter of urgency, due to the potential negative implications for sustainable service delivery. Some existing strategies have been mentioned earlier, which the municipality has initiated, to manage the water demand and improve payment levels. Other strategies need to be developed, but first, a strategy needs to be put in place to address the capacity shortfall. The municipality will have to address the staff shortage through a proper staffing strategy, which should include the appointment of appropriately skilled and experienced staff, alternatively the re-deployment of staff from other sections that could be retrained. The latter option will however result in further delays and is not recommended. Another alternative could be to outsource certain functions, allowing present staff to be more efficient. If this is considered, a study should be done to determine which functions to outsource and determine appropriate processes and procedures to be put in place, to enable full productivity and efficiency. The problem of faulty meters not being reported in time should be addressed. The process according to which this reporting is done needs to be analysed, to determine why this happens. It should be able to be corrected through application of correct procedure. If this is caused by the number of incidents, then the reason for the problem should be investigated. The staff capacity situation has been discussed, and if the numbers are high due to tampering, an educational and community liaison intervention would be required. If this is the case, political support may be needed.



51 A formal programme for the replacement of water meters should be initiated to progress from a reactive mode of operations to a more pro-active approach.

With regard to improved payment for services, it is suggested that a consistent community based campaign to encourage service payments be implemented to assist with motivating payment. One of the ways to assist with Water Resource Management would be to ensure valid, i.e. accurate and up-to-date user information is available. Specifically with regard to the Treasury records, this implies that:

• Duplicate records need to be removed; • Records need to be made more complete, e.g. sub-portion numbers need to be included

where applicable; • Cross-referencing needs to be completed and updated.

Further strategies should also include:

• Water audits to be performed on large users, especially those with high ratios of average

monthly or quarterly consumption / annual average, • Updating surveyor general information in the database for each erf, to allow the linking of

the treasury records to the GIS cadastral database, • Checking the RW bulk meters and Randfontein control meters for correctness, • The separation of the current distribution zones into separate reservoir and elevated tower

zones (See chapter 5) to assist with pressure management, • The division of the distribution area into separately measured supply zones will improve

the management of UAW closer to possible problematic areas, • Installation of pressure relief valves in supply lines feeding into areas where operating

pressures exceed 900 kPa, to comply with regulations under the Water Services Act, • A pipeline management, replacement and rehabilitation programme needs to be

implemented, • Financial planning that will look at the impact of tariffs, both in terms of water conservation

and affordability.

All the above are examples of potential strategic interventions, which should best be addressed through the drafting of a complete Integrated Water Resource Management Plan. Such a plan needs to include the input and participation of all role players, also other internal departments and should be drafted as a first step to ensure proper Water Resource Planning.



52 5. Water Service Infrastructure Profile

5.1 Situation Assessment (Water Services Infrastructure) 5.1.1 Existing infrastructure

The existing bulk and connector infrastructure is shown on the diagrammatic representation below and Figure 5.1.

SC PC PC SC

TCTC

Westergloor Tower

Greenhills Tower

TC SC PC

Finsbury Tower

Finsbury Res.

Pump station for regionPR

SC Storage serving community

BH

LephoiPop

Borehole

Randfontein

The name of Community

04D35N002

14040NC93%

ID number given for theSpecific community in thecentral databaseAn alternative name by which it is known

The present populationin the communityElement indicating theReticulation network inCommunity

The average % of peoplethat are being providedwith the minimum standards of water supply services

SR Storage serving region

GR

SR

FR RAND WATER TREATMENT

RAND WATER STORAGE

RAND WATER CONNECTION

VAAL DAMLEGEND :

Infrastructure status : constructed

RRInfrastructure status : planned

Gravity Main LineGR

Rising Main LineRC

Gravity Main LineGC

Pump station for communityPC

SR

NC

FR

FC

Rising Main Line

Reservoir for Region

Reticulation network

Filter plant for region

Filter plant for community

Tower storage for communityTC



53 Figure 5.1: Main components of existing system – water



54

Brief functional description of existing main infrastructure components (urban and rural)

Component Description of the main functional tasks Responsibility Reservoir 1 This 13.4 Ml reservoir is the storage structure for

the Greenhills water zone Randfontein LM

Water tower 1 This 1.0 Ml water tower supplies the Greenhills water zone with pressure

Randfontein LM

Reservoir 2 This 20.4 Ml reservoir is the storage structure for the Westergloor water zone

Randfontein LM

Water tower 2 This 1.1 Ml water tower supplies the Westergloor water zone with pressure

Randfontein LM

Reservoir 3 This 3.0 Ml reservoir is the storage structure for the Finsbury reservoir and water tower zones

Randfontein LM

Water tower 3 This 0.215 Ml water tower supplies the Finsbury water tower zone with pressure

Randfontein LM

Pump station 1 Pumps water to the Greenhills water tower Randfontein LM Pump station 2 Pumps water to the Westergloor water tower Randfontein LM Pump station 3 Pumps water to the Finsbury water tower Randfontein LM Pipelines 361 km of network and main supply pipelines Randfontein LM

5.1.2 Existing groundwater infrastructure The Randfontein Local Municipality does not deliver a groundwater service. 5.1.3 Existing surface water infrastructure

No water is abstracted from dams or surface water infrastructure by the RLM.

5.1.4 Existing water treatment works infrastructure

The RLM does not treat any water for potable use. Water is provided by the bulk service provider.

5.1.5 Existing pump stations infrastructure

There are three pumping stations, each adjacent to a reservoir in the Randfontein water system. There are 2 or 3 pumps at each pumping station, with one or more pumps available as standby. The pump details are shown in the table below. Pumping stations

Name Number of

pumps Make /Model ℓ/s (m) kl/h (1 pump

on standby) Greenhills 3 Mather & Platt 280 40,1 2 016 Westergloor 3 Mather & Platt 280 30,1 2 016 Finsbury 2 Loewe 50 28,0 180



55 5.1.6 Existing bulk pipeline infrastructure

There are 3 RW bulk meters with 4 Randfontein check meters through which the bulk water for the system is supplied. RW Randfontein North (400 mm) and Randfontein (200 mm) bulk water meters measure the water that is supplied to the Westergloor reservoirs. These RW meters are checked by Randfontein via 3 check meters. The Greenhill reservoirs are supplied with water via the RW Cemetery bulk water meter with one check meter, owned by Randfontein, downstream of the RW meter. The Badirile bulk supply system is currently under construction.

5.1.7 Existing reservoir infrastructure

There are three reservoirs/water tower combinations in the distribution system. At all three reservoir sites the water is pumped from the reservoirs to a water tower for distribution. The reservoir and water tower details are summarized in the table below. The total storage capacity is 39.4 Ml as shown.

Storage Capacity

No Reservoir / Tower Name Existing (Ml)

1 Greenhills Reservoir 1 6.8 2 Greenhills Reservoir 2 6.8 3 Greenhills Tower 1.1 Greenhills sub - total 14.7 4 Westergloor Reservoir 1 6.8 5 Westergloor Reservoir 2 6.8 6 Westergloor Reservoir 3 6.8 7 Westergloor Tower 1.1 Westergloor sub - total 21.5 8 Finsbury Reservoir 3 9 Finsbury Tower 0.2 Finsbury sub - total 3.2 Total storage (Ml) 39.4

The pressure in the water towers (from elevation above sea level) is shown in the following table. Reservoirs and water towers - Pressures

Name Ground

level (m.asl)

Bottom level

(m.asl)

Top water level

(m.asl) Greenhills reservoir Greenhills water tower

1 715 1 715

1 712,4 1 744,7

1 718,5 1 752,5

Westergloor reservoir Westergloor water tower

1 725 1 725

1 722,1 1 744,7

1 728,5 1 752,5

Finsbury reservoir Finsbury water tower

1 714 1 714

1 712,5 1 736,3

1 718,6 1 742,0



56

The reservoirs are all in an operational condition. Maintenance is demand based. Spares are not normally a problem, but slip rings on electrical motors, while available, are very expensive. Some motors have already been replaced with induction motors. There is on average one breakage/failure per year at each reservoir site. Inlet controls and inlet pipes at the Greenhills and Westergloor reservoirs needs to be refurbished. The electrical motors that have not yet been replaced needs to be replaced. The estimated costs of the refurbishment and replacements required are not yet known. This will become available with the new master plan.

5.1.8 Existing reticulation infrastructure (by supply zone)

The entire system is operated as two supply zones, the Westergloor Zone operating as one large zone, which includes the Greenhills system operating as a single tower zone; with the Finsbury zone operating as a single water tower zone. The pipe network of the Randfontein distribution system consists of ± 361 km pressure pipelines with diameters varying between 38mm and 600mm. Based on a year 2003 estimate, the previous master plan calculated the replacement value of the Randfontein system at R 129 829 574. The Greenhills/Westergloor water tower zone is supplied from the Greenhills and Westergloor water towers via their respective reservoirs. The Greenhills reservoir is filled from RW1 and the Westergloor reservoir from RW2 and RW3. This zone incorporates the largest portion of Randfontein, which includes Toekomsrus and Mohlakeng. Construction is currently underway to split the Mohlakeng zone into separate reservoir and tower zones. The Finsbury water tower zone is supplied from the Finsbury water tower via the Finsbury reservoir. The Finsbury reservoir is filled via the network of the Greenhills/Westergloor water tower zone under gravity. Construction is also currently underway to split the Finsbury zone into separate reservoir and tower zones; Finsbury to be supplied from the tower with Kocksoord to be supplied from the reservoir. The main operational problems reported by field staff are as follows:

• Faulty bulk water meters, from time to time; • Low pressure during peak hours in Greenhills North; • Muddy water in Homelake ext. 1 during rainy season. There is an efficient billing system managed by the Finance Directorate. Block tariffs are applied, as is a credit control system and policy. The financial operations are discussed in Chapter 9.

5.1.9 Existing sanitation Infrastructure

The entire sewerage system is divided into 9 drainage areas. The drainage areas drain either to a pumping station or to a collector or outfall sewer.



57

The large contributors of sewage flow are:

• Continental Oil Mills • Tiger Milling/Meadow Feeds • Aranda • Nola • Gemtex • Bhongweni

Level of service No. of sanitation units VIP toilets Other dry sanitation toilets Septic tanks 2692 (estimate) Bulk sewer 24002 New wastewater treatment works or to be upgraded

Retrofitting of existing Works (Est. R15m)

Infrastructure for de-sludging and pit emptying

Vacuum Tanker - 1

There are approximately 314 km’s of sewer pipelines in the Randfontein system of which ± 12,5 km’s are rising mains. The main components are shown on Figure 5.2 below (from previous WSDP). The table below gives a summary of the pipelines in the system, the information as calculated in the September 2003 Master Plan. There are ± 5 645 manholes in the sewer reticulation network with 6 diversion structures to divert certain portions of the flow in two directions. Bhongweni and Continental Oil Mills each has a dedicated sewer main, which take their discharges through the secondary networks, without any connections, to link up with the main/collector sewers.

Breakdown of pipelines

Nominal Pipe Diameter (mm) Gravity Pipes Length (m)

Rising Mains Length (m)

Replacement Value

Year 2003 (R) 100 14 950 4 897 620 125 296 116 032 150 239 488 9 920 104 473 600 160 2 593 1 089 060 200 10 578 5 242 457 225 6 954 3 894 240 250 965 598 493 300 9 190 2 602 8 846 550 375 2 370 1 901 214 400 5 166 4 628 736 450 3 417 3 339 093 525 1 824 2 065 863 600 2 804 3 587 998 850 2 737 5 322 370 900 483 1 139 397

TOTALS 303 815 12 522 151 142 723



58 Figure 5.2: Main components of existing system - sewer



59

There are 9 pump municipal pump stations in the Randfontein system, plus an additional 5 privately owned pump stations in Randfontein that discharge sewerage into the sewer system. Table 3 provides a list of all the pump stations and their approximate capacities. The estimated present average daily dry weather flow (ADDWF) in the system is ± 17 000 kℓ/d.

Existing sewer pump stations

Pump Station PUMP STATION CAPACITY ℓ/S

No Name

Number of pumps Min Max

1 Randpoort 2 4,8 5,9 2 De Fontein 2 15,7 16,3 3 Aloe Road 2 1,5 2,4 4 Rietbok Street 2 2,8 3,4 5 Finsbury 3 19,3 20,8 6 Kocksoord 2 18,7 20,8 7 Bussing Road 2 8,4 9,6 8 Erf 16, Aureus 2 20,0 20,0 9 Toekomsrus 2 60,0 60,0 10 Bhongweni * 3 N/A N/A 11 Robin Park * 2 N/A N/A 12 Dippenaar Park * N/A N/A N/A 13 Robinson Hospital

(2x pump stations)* N/A N/A N/A

14 Froneman Park * N/A N/A N/A

N/A - Information not available. * Privately owned pump stations

There are two bulk sewer meters in the system, one at the Randfontein WCW and one at the inflow to Westonaria WCW.

Existing sewage treatment works infrastructure

The sewage of the entire system drains to two treatment works, viz. the Randfontein WCW and the Westonaria WCW. Effluent from Mohlakeng is treated at the Westonaria WCW, with the rest of Randfontein’s effluent treated at its own treatment works, which is being managed and operated by a contracted service provider. Randfontein’s own sewage treatment works is situated north of the town and has a capacity of 19 000 kℓ/d. The total sewer flow to the Randfontein works is ± 10 200 kℓ/d, which is ± 60% of the total sewer flow. The treated sewage is discharged into the Elandsvlei Spruit. The rest of the sewer flow, which is mainly the sewer flow from Mohlakeng, discharges to the neighbouring Westonaria WCW.



60

General information STW1 STW2 STW3 Component name Component ID Scheme name Randfontein WWTW Institutional status Current owner RLM Current operator Rand Water/RLM Future owner / WSA (If applicable) N/A Future operator / WSP (If applicable) N/A Asset assessment

Date constructed ±1955 Upgraded ±1975

Expected total lifespan 30 Years Estimated replacement value R30m Annual operating cost R7.8m Annual maintenance cost R800,000

Type (process) & capacity Type of plant (i.e. Activated sludge / Bio-filter / Oxidation Ponds) Activated Sludge

Design Capacity - Hydraulic Load (Ml/day) 19,5 How much capacity is still available for development? (%) 25 Design Capacity - Organic Load (COD kg/day)

How much capacity is still available for development? (%) Inlet meter (type)

Operation Total volume of water received and treated per year (Ml) Ave 4200 Operating hours per day 24 Discharge into (description of source) Elandsvlei Spruit Discharge volume (Ml/annum) 2600 Volume of effluent recycled (Ml/annum) 1600 Applications of recycled effluent (i.e. irrigation, mining, etc) Irrigation Effluent control (by whom) RLM/Rand Water Permitted effluent (Ml/annum) 8140 Solid waste disposal (m³/annum) Sludge produced (m³/annum) How often is water quality monitored? (daily, weekly, monthly, annual, never) Weekly

What laboratory is used? DD Science % Of the time that effluent is chlorinated 100

Functionality Describe the physical condition (in operation, poor, good) In operation but poor How well is the infrastructure maintained? (none, infrequent, demand, planned) Demand & Planned

Are spare parts readily available? (Yes/No) Depends on spares required

Number of breakages / failures per year What needs to be refurbished? (cost) What needs to be replaced? (cost)



61 5.1.10 Existing Asset Management Assessment

There is currently a basic asset register being maintained by the Directorate Finance. There is however no official Asset Management Plan and asset management assessments and the creation of a comprehensive asset register is required.

5.1.11 Assessment of Existing Operations

The operational assessment as per the Operational Assessment form is as attached separately to this report. In essence, all areas drain or pump into a main sewer, which traverses the town from Aureus in the south, through Greenhills in the north, and terminates at the Randfontein WCW. Previously, all the sewer pump stations in Mohlakeng were eliminated and replaced by gravity sewers that terminate at the Westonaria WCW. The main operational problems in the system, as reported by field staff of the City Engineers Department, are:

• Stormwater ingress; • Frequent blockages throughout the entire sewer system.

5.1.12 Assessment of Existing Maintenance

The maintenance assessment as per the Existing Maintenance Assessment form is as attached separately to this report.

5.1.13 Schemes to be transferred: water

This is not applicable to RLM, with no schemes to be transferred.

5.1.14 Schemes to be transferred: sanitation

As with Water above, this is not applicable to RLM. 5.1.15 Schemes to be rehabilitated

The schemes requiring rehabilitation is to be re-assessed during current Master Planning exercise.

5.2 Future Trends and Goals (Water Services Infrastructure)

Determining of the required infrastructure to accommodate future development in Randfontein has largely been based on expansion. The optimisation of existing infrastructure capacity through achieving a balance between expansion and infill or densification, is currently being addressed.

5.2.1 New Infrastructure to be built

Detailed Master Planning for Water and Sanitation was done and the plans produced in September 2003. Both plans are currently under review and being updated. The detailed description of the required and proposed infrastructure is included in those documents and is not repeated here. Discussions below are summarised from the detail in the master plans. New infrastructure is required essentially to the development of the proposed new townships, being Droogeheuvel, Middelvlei & Badirile.



62 5.2.2 Future internal and connector infrastructure

Master planning was done taking cognisance of present and future land use and water demand projections. The proposed works as presented in the master plan were determined for the water demand of a water distribution system serving fully occupied developed land. The phasing in of these works is dependant on the real growth in water demand, due to occupation of vacant erven, and the program of new land development. Current internal and connector infrastructure required will be mostly for the proposed new townships, Droogeheuvel, Middelvlei & Badirile. The 2003 master plan for the upgrading and extension of Randfontein’s sewer system was prepared with a view to eliminating existing problems and to accommodating future sewer flows. See the project list in Chapter 10 for the detail of all projects, including internal and connector projects.

Type of Scheme Component Short description

Feasibility checked

(Y/N)

Scheduled Date

Estimated Cost

Water Y 2006 Internal reticulation Sanitation

Mohlakeng Ext 3 Y 2006

Internal reticulation

Water Mohlakeng Ext 7 Y 2006

Sanitation Y 2006 Internal reticulation

Water Mohlakeng Ext 8 Y 2006

Sanitation Y 2006 Internal reticulation

Water Droogeheuvel Y 2007/8

Sanitation Y 2007/8 Internal reticulation

Water Middelvlei Y 2007/8

Sanitation Y 2007/8 Internal reticulation

Water Badirile Y 2007/8

Sanitation Y 2007/8

See Projects List

5.2.3 Future bulk water supply infrastructure

There are two categories of bulk supply facilities for the Randfontein system viz.

• Feeder mains to reservoirs; • Internal facilities, such as reservoirs, pumping stations and water towers.



63 The bulk facilities were planned in accordance with the criteria stipulated in Chapter 5 of the Master Plan.

Type of Scheme Component Short

description Feasibility checked

(Y/N)

Scheduled Date Estimated Cost

Bulk Water Badirile Y 2006 R9,1m Bulk Water Droogeheuvel Y 2007/8 R17,8m Bulk Water Middelvlei Y 2007/8 R5,85m

5.2.4 Future bulk sanitation infrastructure

Type of Scheme Component Short

description Feasibility checked

(Y/N) Scheduled

Date Estimated

Cost

Bulk Sewer Mohlakeng Outfall

Y 2006 R1,231,200

Bulk Sewer Mohlakeng Phase 2

Y 2006 R2,000,000

Bulk Sewer Middelvlei Outfall

Y 2007 R14,250,000

Bulk Sewer Droogeheuvel Outfall

Y 2006 R2,550,000

Bulk Sewer Badirile WWTW

Y 2007 R3,200,000

Future trends and goals for infrastructure other that mentioned above:

Resources available to perform function (Yes/ No/

N/A) Proposed New Infrastructure Budget Bylaws Infrastructure Personnel

1. New infrastructure to be built Y N/A N N 2. Future internal & connector Y N/A N N 3. Future bulk water supply Y N/A N N 4. Future bulk sanitation Y N/A N N

5.2.5 Asset Management Plan

See as discussed under 5.1.10 above.



64 5.2.5.1 Operational Plan

Function Status quo Requirements

(to comply with basic requirements)

Action Plan

Staff

Insufficient Fill vacancies Finalise restructuring

External resources

Materials

Source as & when required

Maintain minimum stock levels

Update min. stock levels

Tools & Equipment

Insufficient Specialised equipment

Budget & acquire

Transport

Available Increase fleet as & when required

RE

SO

UR

CE

Budget

Available Adjust in accordance with new assets acquired/built

Manuals

Available

As-built information

Some available Update Master plans

INFO

RM

ATI

ON

Safety plan

None OHS Act Draft & implement

Procedures

Record keeping

Ad hoc basis Implement where required

AC

TIV

ITY

C

ON

TRO

L

Quality control

Risk management

CO

MP

ON

EN

T D

ES

CR

IPTI

ON

:

MA

NA

GE

-M

EN

T

Reporting

If & when required



65 5.2.5.2 Maintenance Plan

Function Status quo

Requirements (to comply with basic

requirements) Action Plan

- Staff • Condition monitoring Weekly Reporting system To be implemented

• Planned Maintenance None Personnel Finalise structure and appoint staff

• Unplanned Maintenance As & when required

Maintain standby arrangements

- External resources

• Condition monitoring None utilised Acquire services as & when required

• Planned Maintenance None utilised Acquire services as & when required

• Unplanned Maintenance None utilised Acquire services as & when required

- Materials • Condition monitoring Not required • Planned Maintenance Stock available Maintain stock levels • Unplanned Maintenance Stock available Maintain stock levels - Tools & equipment

• Condition monitoring Not done Acquire monitoring equipment

Budget

• Planned Maintenance Available Ensure availability of suitable tools

• Unplanned Maintenance Available Ensure availability of suitable tools

- Transport • Condition monitoring Not done

• Planned Maintenance Available Vehicles Ensure availability of vehicles

• Unplanned Maintenance Available Vehicles Ensure availability of vehicles

- Budget

• Condition monitoring Not available Capital budget provision Provide for capital

expenditure for monitoring equipment

• Planned Maintenance Available O&M budget Adjust O&M budget annually

• Unplanned Maintenance Available O&M budget Adjust O&M budget annually

- Manuals

• Condition monitoring None Operating manuals Acquire manual on acquisition of equipment

• Planned Maintenance Not required • Unplanned Maintenance Not required - As-built information • Condition monitoring N/A

• Planned Maintenance Upon changes Update when changes occur

• Unplanned Maintenance Upon changes Update when changes occur

- Safety plan

• Condition monitoring Adherence to OHS Act

OHS Act Toolbox talks

• Planned Maintenance Adherence to OHS Act


• Unplanned Maintenance Adherence to OHS Act


- Procedures

• Condition monitoring None Records Implement subject to staff availability

CO

MP

ON

EN

T D

ESC

RIP

TIO

N:

• Planned Maintenance Recorded Availability of material/equipment



66 • Unplanned Maintenance In place Procedures Availability

of material/equipment

- Record keeping

• Condition monitoring None Records Implement subject to staff availability

• Planned Maintenance As & when required

Update as-built information


Update as-built information

- Quality control • Condition monitoring

• Planned Maintenance On site inspection

Monitoring

• Unplanned Maintenance On site inspection

Monitoring

- Risk management • Condition monitoring • Planned Maintenance Assess Safe working conditions Preventative measures • Unplanned Maintenance Assess Safe working conditions Preventative measures

- Reporting Status quo Requirements

(to comply with basic requirements)

Action Plan

• Condition monitoring

• Planned Maintenance As & when required

Inform manager


Inform manager

5.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Water Services Infrastructure)

Densification occurring throughout the town requires bulk infrastructure contributions to be made, to improve storage capacity to maintain minimum requirements. No formula or policy currently exists to calculate equitable and fair developer contributions.

5.4 Implementation Strategies (Water Services Infrastructure)

Inlet controls and inlet pipes at the Greenhills and Westergloor reservoirs needs to be refurbished. Asset Management Plan and asset management assessments and the creation of a comprehensive asset register are required. Budgeting for future bulk services at Droogeheuvel, Badirile and Middelvlei should be approved as indicated in 5.2.3. above. The following further investigations are required: Stormwater ingress To limit the effect of ingress, an investigation program should be launched where an erf-by-erf survey of the stormwater system is conducted with a view to identifying illegal stormwater connections to sewer gulleys, and low-lying manholes which may become inundated during rainstorms. If these aspects can be brought under control, there should be a drastic decrease in stormwater ingress. The investigation should commence in those areas where the highest ingress is likely to occur, typically the older parts of the town. Infiltration and leakage The relatively large base flow measured in the sewers in the Aureus area could be due to damming in the pipelines or to groundwater infiltration and leakage. Detailed inspections and monitoring of these systems should be performed, and flow measurements taken at selected locations to identify problem areas.



67

Developer Bulk Services Contributions A study is required to determine appropriate formulas and rates to be applied for calculating contributions by developers for the provision of bulk services. Such a study should recommend appropriate values and formulas, as well as propose policy in this regard.

6. WATER BALANCE

6.1 Water Balance

6.1.1 Situation Assessment (Water Balance) 6.1.1.1 Amount of bulk water abstracted (Ml/year)

Randfontein purchases bulk water from Rand Water, who is the bulk supplier. No abstraction takes place for own bulk supply.

6.1.1.2 Amount of bulk water purchased from others (Ml/year)

The discussion below utilises the figures as produced in the previous master plan (2003), i.e. the water purchases and sales figures for the 2002/03 financial year. Efforts were made to update these figures with the latest treasury data, but due to technical problems, this was not available at the time of the finalisation of this report. The latest figures will be used to produce the new master plan currently underway. According to the 2003 master plan, for the year ending May 2003, the total water input into the three zones for Randfontein was 7 497,1 Ml, or 20 540 kl/d on average. This is the total of bulk water purchased for the entire area. The growth in demand can be seen when compared to the figure for the 2001/2002 financial year, when 6 786 Ml of purified bulk water was purchased from Rand Water. The total water sold for the year ending May 2003, according to the treasury data analyses, was 5 602,2 Ml, which indicates the area-wide best estimate for UAW as:

Bulk water input into the three zones for which treasury data was available

- 7 497,1 Ml/y

Water sold in Randfontein - 5 602,2 Ml/y ∴ Area-wide UAW 1 894,9 Ml/y

The average daily UAW therefore amounts to 5 191 kℓ/d, or 25,3%, which is very high.

Record: Prior Source Purchased from

Contracted supply volume

Current 2005/06

Ml Estimate

Year 5 2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

1 Rand Water N/A 7 497,1 TOTAL 7 497,1



68 6.1.1.3 Water supplied to consumers (Ml/year) – urban

As indicated above, the total volume of water sold to all consumers during the 2002/03 financial year was 5 602,2 Ml.

Record: Prior

Cur

rent

20

05/0

6

Es

timat

e Ye

ar 5

2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

1. Residential communal water supply

Est. 66.9

Subject to relocation

57.1 56.1 42.2 44.9 33.0

2. 2. Residential controlled volume supply


3. Residential uncontrolled volume supply

N/A N/A 5451.4 N/A N/A

Industrial Supply – Wet 83.27 Industrial Supply – Dry Commercial supply 6.29 Other supply (including water

supplied to other water services institutions)

19.04

4. Sub-Total (treated water supplied) (sum 1 to 7)

5602.2

5. Raw water (i.e. supplied untreated)


10. Recycled (from treated effluent) (must be reported as a negative figure)


11. Total water supplied (8 + 9 + 10)

5602.2

12. Physical water losses (bulk water supplied minus 11)

1894,9

Record: Prior

Cur

rent

20

05/0

6

Estim

ate

Year

5

2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

New Water Connections

83 Dependent on developments

87 93 N/A N/A N/A

New Sewer Connections

23 Dependent on developments

39 26 N/A N/A N/A

6.1.1.3.1 Categorisation of residential uncontrolled volume supply (Ml/year)

Current supply Proportion Residential uncontrolled volume supply 5451.4 100% Category 1: Fully serviced houses, large erven

N/A

Category 2: Fully serviced town houses N/A Category 3: Fully serviced houses on small erven

N/A

Category 4: Small houses, water connections, no sewage

N/A

Category 5: Hostels, military camps, etc

N/A



69

6.1.1.4 Water supplied to consumers (Ml/year) – rural

Record: Prior

Cur

rent

20

05/0

6

Estim

ate

Year

5

2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01 1. Residential communal water supply N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2. Residential controlled volume supply 3. Residential uncontrolled volume

supply N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

4. Industrial Supply – Wet N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5. Industrial Supply – Dry N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6. Commercial supply N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7. Other supply (including water

supplied to other water services institutions)


8. Sub-Total (treated water supplied) (sum 1 to 7)

9. Raw water (i.e. supplied untreated) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10. Recycled (from treated effluent)

(must be reported as a negative figure)


11. Total water supplied (8 + 9 + 10) 12. Physical water losses (bulk water

supplied minus 11)

6.1.1.5 Total physical water losses (Ml/year)

Record: Prior

Cur

rent

20

05/0

6

Estim

ate

Year

5

2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

1. Total physical water losses: Urban 2. Total physical water losses: Rural 3. Total physical water losses 1894,9

As was discussed above, the total water purchased for 2002/03 was 7 497,1 Ml, and the total sold was 5 602,2 Ml. The total of water losses for the year was therefore 1 894,9 Ml, or 25,3%, implying an average daily water loss of 5 191 kl/d.

The high UAW figure for Randfontein could be explained by the lack of individual meters in some areas or faulty meters. The losses in the Randfontein system is higher than the norm, and there is much potential for implementation of a water demand management program, with a view to conserving water, and lowering UAW and unit water demands.

6.1.1.6 Total influent received at treatment works

For the purposes of the 2003 Master Plan study, the system has been subdivided into 10 drainage areas. These areas all drain either to a pump station, or to a main or collector sewer, which forms part of the reticulation network.



70 The annual average daily water demand (AADD) for the system is ± 20 540 kl/d which includes the unaccounted-for-water (UAW) figure of 5 191 kl/d. The total estimated average daily dry weather flow (ADDWF) of ± 17 000 kℓ/d represents ± 83% of the water consumption. There is one outside contributor to the sewer flow in the Randfontein system, viz. Bhongweni mine hostels. The sewerage from these hostels is pumped from the Bhongweni pump station to Randfontein.

Large contributors to the flow, are:

Contributor AADD

• Continental Oil Mills • Foodcorp Ltd. • Aranda Textiles • Delmas Milling Co. • Gemtex (Pty) Ltd.

650 kl/d 418 kl/d 280 kl/d 203 kl/d 100 kl/d

There are altogether 47 consumers with AADD more than 15 kl/d. These users also make significant contributions to the sewer flow. Randfontein has its own sewage treatment works which is situated north of the town and has a capacity of 19 000 kl/d. The works were completed in 1980 and utilize biological filtration in the treatment process. The total sewer flow to the Randfontein works is ± 10 200 kl/d (3 723 Ml/year)*, which is ± 60% of the total sewer flow. The treated sewage is discharged into the Elandsvlei spruit. The rest of the sewer flow, which is mainly the sewer flow from Mohlakeng, discharges to the neighbouring Westonaria WCW. Note: Industrial wastewater is not measured separately except for the wet industries that have effluent meters. These figures in conjunction with the effluent quality are used to calculate penalties. Note that some effluent is discharged to Westonaria WWTW (Hannes van Niekerk Works)

* The perceived discrepancy between the flow figures above (4 200Ml vs 3 723 Ml) is due to the use of

the master plan figures (2003), as compared to the latest measurement (2005/06). This gives an indication of the growth, which will be updated when the new master planning results become available.

Record: Prior

Cur

rent

20

05/0

6

2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

Sour

ce

Res

ourc

e N

ame

Wor

ks

Nam

e

Tot % ind Estim

ate

Yea

r 5

Tot % ind Tot % ind Tot % ind Tot % ind Tot % ind

1 Randfontein WWTW

4200 Ml/y*

1.45

2 3 4



71 6.1.1.6.1 Total returns to the water resource system

Current returns

Source Works Name

Resource Name (river, dam, other)

Total returns* (Ml/year) OR

Portion (%) of total influent returned

Portion (%) of total influent re-used.

1 Randfontein WWTW

Elandsvlei spruit 2600 61.9 38.1

2 3 4

6.1.2 Future Trends and Goals (Water Balance) 6.1.2.1 Amount of bulk water abstracted (Ml/year)

No bulk water is to be abstracted.

6.1.2.2 Amount of bulk purchased from others (Ml/year)

The future AADD for the existing network, with all plots fully developed and allowing for UAW of 25%, is 21 279 kl/day. The AADD projection for the potential development areas, fully developed, are an additional 7 328 kl/day, bringing the future total water demand to 28 607 kl/day, or rather 10 441,5 Ml/year. The timeframe for the establishment of this demand will be determined by the rate of development in the area. The provision of funds to establish new infrastructure for this purpose will be required as development is approved.

6.1.2.3 Water Supplied to consumers (Ml/year) – urban

The demand above has been estimated allowing for UAW of 25%, which is conservative. The projected supply to all consumers is 8353,2 Ml/year, or 22 885,5 kl/day.

6.1.2.3.1 Categorisation of residential uncontrolled volume supply (Ml/year)

It is envisaged that all water will be supplied as uncontrolled volume supply.

6.1.2.4 Water Supplied to consumers (Ml/year) – rural

A future service specifically to rural consumers is not envisaged at present and the figures for urban consumers include the non-specific supply to users that may be categorised as rural.

6.1.2.5 Total physical water losses (Ml/year)

The projections allow for 25% water losses, as a conservative estimate. This however is recognised to be high and measures to improve on the current experience (UAW of 25,3%) need to be implemented.



72 6.1.2.6 Total influent received at treatment works

The sewer flow measured in 1996 indicates an average daily dry weather flow of ± 85% of AADD and in 2003, ± 83% of AADD. It is assumed that the future sewer flow will remain at ± 80% of AADD. On the basis of these assumptions, the future sewage flows can be estimated in terms of average daily dry weather flow to the various water care works. The sewer flow of the future land developments within Randfontein, at ± 80% of the AADD, is estimated to be 5 109 kl/d, with the additional sewer flow that will be generated by the 139 current vacant erven estimated at 146 kl/day. This future additional flow brings the estimated total ADDWF to 23 381 kl/day, or 8 534,1 Ml/year.

6.1.2.7 Total returns to the water resource system

The total returns to the water resource system from the Randfontein WWTW are 2600Ml/year, or 61,9%. The returns from the Westonaria WWTW are unknown, although RLM contributes to their influent. Note that the returns to the resource system is to the Elandsvlei Spruit (draining northwards), whilst the water discharge from the Westonaria WWTW discharges to the south, into the Wonderfontein Spruit.

6.1.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Water Balance)

The figures above, specifically relating to UAW, as well as the figures as relating to the finer categorisation as required in this latest version of the WSDP, indicates that there is a serious gap relating to the availability of, and quality of available data and information. The improvement of this situation will allow for better analysis, and enable better planning to improve the UAW figure for the area. It will also enable better planning for water services in general. As reported in other sections, a lack of capacity is a general concern, with a lack of personnel and funding also affecting the proper management of the water balance in the area.

6.1.4 Implementation Strategies (Water Balance)

The average daily UAW for Randfontein amounts to 5 191 kl/d or 25,3% which is very high. This could be explained by the lack of individual meters in some areas or faulty meters. A strategy to obtain better information, as mentioned above, as well as an improved maintenance/replacement/installation program for existing or required meters is required. As indicated by the above, there is much potential for implementation of a water demand management program, with a view to conserving water, and lowering UAW and unit water demands.

7. WATER SERVICES INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

7.1 Water Services Institutional Arrangements

7.1.1 Situation Assessment (Water Services Institutional Arrangements)



73 7.1.1.1 WSA functions and outputs

Randfontein Local Municipality is the Water Services Authority (WSA) for its area.

WSA functions / outputs In place? (Yes/ no/

N/A) Resources available to perform

function? (Yes/ No/ N/A)

If no, when

will it be in place?

Support required (yes/no)

Budget Bylaws Infra-structure Personnel

Policy development Indigent Policy Yes Yes Yes Yes No Free basic water policy (including equitable share)

Yes Yes Yes Yes No

Free basic sanitation policy Yes Yes Yes Yes No Procurement policy Yes Yes Yes Yes No Credit control & debt collection policy Yes Yes Yes Yes No Regulation and tariffs Water Services bylaws with conditions as required by the Water Services Act

No

Yes Yes Yes June ‘06 No

Mechanisms to ensure compliance with bylaws

Yes Yes Yes No Yes

Tariff structure Yes Yes Yes Yes No Tariffs promulgated Yes Yes Yes Yes No Infrastructure development (projects) Mechanisms to undertake project feasibility studies

Yes No Yes No No

Criteria for prioritising projects Yes Yes Yes Yes No Mechanisms to assess and approve project business plans

Yes Yes Yes Yes No

Mechanisms for selecting, contracting, managing and monitoring implementing agents

Yes Yes Yes Yes No

Mechanisms to monitor project implementation

Yes Yes Yes No ‘May ‘06 No

Water conservation and demand management

Water conservation and demand management strategy

Yes Yes Yes No No

Performance management and monitoring

Performance management systems Yes Yes Yes Yes No Water service monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system

No No Yes No Yes

WSDP WSDP information system Yes Yes Yes Yes No Mechanisms for stakeholder participation

Yes Yes Yes Yes No

Mechanisms to monitor and report on WSDP implementation

Yes Yes Yes Yes No

WSP institutional arrangements N/A Criteria to select appropriate WSPs N/A N/A N/A N/A No Mechanisms to contract, manage and monitor WSPs

Yes N/A N/A N/A No

Mechanisms to approve WSP business plans

Yes Yes Yes Yes No

WSA overall capacity N/A Sufficient staff and systems to fulfill all WSA functions

No No No No Yes

Other (state)



74 7.1.1.2 WSA capacity development

The Randfontein Local Municipality, as WSA, suffers mostly in terms of capacity, due to a lack of resources. The single biggest problem is that of a lack of personnel. In terms of the implementation of projects and the management thereof, limited existing staff capacity is available. Currently, even if more money was available, implementation would be problematic due to this lack of human resources to undertake the functions required. However, provision for a Project Management Unit (PMU) has been made and is to be funded from Randfontein’s annual MIG allocation. A business plan in this regard has already been approved by DPLG and the PMU functions are set to commence on 1 August 2006. The PMU will report directly to the MM and will be headed by a Project Manager assisted by a Technician. Appointments for both these positions have already been finalised. The restructuring process within Randfontein LM is well advanced. Additional staff has been requested and the provision thereof promised. Yet, before staff can be approved, the new Organisational structure has to be approved, as well as the remuneration levels of new posts. The municipality undertakes this as a total process for the whole structure, which causes delays in the filling of vacancies. However, critical positions have been identified and it is expected for these vacant positions to be filled within the foreseeable future.

WSA priorities for capacity

development

Capacity needs

assessment conducted

(yes/no)

Formal skills training required (Yes/no)

Proposed timeframe for

capacity development

Estimated cost

Additional Staff needed to deal with workload.

7.1.1.3 Bylaws affecting water services

ID Bylaw name

Short description Criteria Effect on water

services Water &

Sanitation By-laws As per S21 of Water

Services Act, 1997 Regulatory

The municipality currently supplies both retail water supply and sanitation services to its residents. It is also the bulk water services provider for wastewater.

Resources available to perform function (Yes/ No/

N/A) Bulk & Retail Functions Budget Bylaws Infrastructure Personnel

1. Water Service providers (retail water)

N/A N/A N/A N/A

2. Water service providers (sanitation)

Yes Agreement Yes Yes

3. Water service providers (bulk water)

Yes N/A Yes Yes

4. Water service providers (bulk sanitation)

Yes Yes Yes Yes



75 Resources available to perform function (Yes/ No/

N/A) 5.Support service agents (water) N/A N/A N/A N/A

6. Sanitation Promotion agent No N/A No No 7. Support service contracts Yes N/A Yes Yes 8. Water service institutions Yes N/A Yes Yes 9. WSP staffing levels: water 10. WSP staffing levels: sanitation 11. WSP training programme

7.1.1.4 Water Services providers (retail water) – current year

Randfontein is the WSA and the major water services provider in its area. There is a situation with Rand Water supplying water directly to the mines, which needs to be addressed. This water supply bypasses Randfontein and means that mines do not contribute to costs incurred by Randfontein as the water services authority, nor make any contribution to the cross-subsidization of poor consumers in Randfontein. A draft water services agreement with Rand Water is being considered to resolve this issue. Resulting from demarcation, approximately 57 of the Ten Acres Agricultural Holdings, previously under the jurisdiction of Westonaria, have now been included into Randfontein’s area of jurisdiction. Some of these holdings are serviced with municipal water supply from Westonaria. Randfontein’s existing reticulation does not extend to these extremities, hence Randfontein cannot provide the service. In view of this, Randfontein still needs to enter into a WSP agreement with Westonaria.

Contract Area

Settlement type (urban /

rural)

Name of water services provider (WSP)

Type of WSP

Signed contract (yes/no)

Type of contract

% Consumers served by the

WSP

Part of Ten Acres A.H.

Rural Westonaria LM

Local Authority

No Water > 1%

Area

with no WSP


rural) % Consumers

with no WSP

1. 2.

7.1.1.5 Water services providers (sanitation) – current year

The RLM is the water services provider (sanitation) in the area (see bulk provision below).

7.1.1.6 Water services providers (bulk water) – current

Water supply in RLM is delivered according to the following two bulk water services provider categories:

• A separate bulk WSP sells bulk water to (retail) water services providers. • The bulk service is provided by the same organization as that which provides the retail

service.



76

Rand Water is appointed as the bulk water services provider to deliver bulk water and sells to RLM, who is the WSP. Partially, with regard to the mines and mine townships, Rand Water also provides a retail service.

Contract area


rural) Name of bulk

WSP Type of

bulk WSP


Type of contract


bulk WSP 1. Rand-

fontein Urban Rand Water Water Yes Bulk

supply 84

2. 3. 4. Percentage consumers who require bulk water services but with no bulk WSP

05

Percentage consumers who do not require a bulk WSP 11 7.1.1.7 Water services provider (bulk sanitation) – current

Randfontein Local Municipality is also the water services provider (bulk sanitation). The municipality has negotiated a management contract agreement with Rand Water (Sanitation Division) to manage the Randfontein wastewater treatment works. This replaces a contract they previously had with a private firm, Sediba, and following that, a month-to-month basis contract with Rand Water. This management contract with Rand Water was negotiated for a 3-year period (commencing 1 May 2005) and will likely need to be re-negotiated at the end of this period. Westonaria Municipality is a de facto bulk water services provider, as it accepts bulk wastewater flow from Randfontein. The draft agreement with Westonaria for bulk wastewater has been available for some time but has not been signed. It requires review.

Contract area


rural)

Name of bulk sanitation

WSP

Type of bulk

sanitation WSP


Type of contract


bulk sanitation

WSP 1. Rand- fontein

Urban Westonaria Local Municipality

Local Authority

No Purification 42

2. Rand-fontein WWTW

Urban Rand Water Sanitation Yes O & M, Management

58

3. 4. Percentage consumers who require bulk sanitation services but with no bulk sanitation WSP

Percentage consumers who do not require a bulk sanitation WSP

7.1.1.8 Support services agents (water) – current This is not applicable to RLM.



77 7.1.1.9 Sanitation promotion agent – current

There is no sanitation promotion agent active in Randfontein. The municipality (Directorates Infrastructure and Social Services respectively) has never undertaken any such activities, nor budget for the provision thereof. The function is also not catered for in the organizational structure. Consideration should be given to promote health and hygiene awareness, i.e. through improved sanitation, a function which should be performed by the health authorities.

7.1.1.10 Support service contracts – current

Defining and managing service delivery agreements, is a critical function of the service authority. In the case of the Randfontein Local Municipality, two service delivery agreements exist with Rand Water and Westonaria, though, in the case of Westonaria, without a properly drafted contract. This situation should be remedied.

WSP functions for which the municipality has service

contracts: Duration of

contract Operation, Maintenance and Management of the Randfontein WWTW

3 Years

7.1.1.11 Water service institution

WSI or WSA for which the municipality has service

contracts: Duration of

contract Westonaria Local Municipality Perpetual

7.1.1.12 WSP staffing levels: water

Note that the structure below includes for both water and sanitation operations, since the different functions have not been split into separate sections within Randfontein’s organizational structure.

Number of employees

Executive and senior

mana-gement

Middle management Clerical Supervisory

or artisan General worker Total

1. Finance and administration (2)*

2. Projects and planning (1)* (1)*

3. Operations 1 1 2

4. Bulk service 1 14 15

5. Distribution services 3 9 12

6. Customer services (2)* 4 12 16

7. Total 2 1 9 35 45

8. Projection of total in five years time (W & S)

2 1 1 13 66 83

Technical Planning Unit (+5 Yrs) 3 2 1 6

(-)* Personnel deployed in different departments that render a service to water & sanitation. Not included in Totals.

7.1.1.13 WSP Staffing levels: sanitation

Note that the structure below only allows for the Waste Water Treatment Works personnel as per Randfontein’s organizational structure that provides for a separate section.



78 Executive

and senior management

Middle management

Clerical Supervisory or artisan

General worker

Total

1. Finance and administration

(1)* (2)* (1)*

2. Projects and planning 3. Operations 4. Bulk service 2 1 4 12 17 5. Distribution services 6. Customer services 7. Total 2 1 4 12 17 8. Projection of total in

five years time 4 2 5 21 32

(-)* Personnel allocated in terms of management agreement with services provider. These

personnel are however not deployed in a full time capacity at the WWTW. Not included in Totals.

7.1.1.14 WSP training programme

In terms of the provisions of the management agreement between Rand Water and RLM, accredited training forms part of an ongoing training programme for all the WWTW’s operational personnel. Currently however, no further information is readily available.

7.1.2 Future Trends and Goals (Water Services Institutional Arrangements) 7.1.2.1 Water Services providers (retail water) – year 5

Randfontein will remain the WSA and sole water services provider in its area. It is anticipated that the situation with Westonaria, providing water to the informal settlement of Zenzele, will be resolved. The situation with Rand Water supplying water directly to the mines, should also have been addressed. The proposed draft water services agreement with Rand Water, currently being considered, should resolve this issue.

7.1.2.2 Water Services providers (sanitation) – year 5

Provision of sanitation services is to continue as current, based on the provisions as per the bulk services, discussed below.

7.1.2.3 Water services provider (bulk water) – year 5

It is anticipated that the current situation will continue, whereby RLM will remain the WSP in terms of reticulation and Rand Water the bulk services provider. The situation with Rand Water also doing a portion of reticulation should be resolved.

7.1.2.4 Water services provider (bulk sanitation) – year 5

Randfontein Local Municipality will remain the water services provider (bulk sanitation).



79

The management contract with Rand Water to manage the Randfontein wastewater treatment works, that commenced on 1 May 2005, effective until 2008, should be continued into the future. The current agreement with Westonaria for some bulk wastewater provision, should also continue, based on a formal agreement.

7.1.2.5 Support services agents (water) – year 5

This is not applicable to RLM.

7.1.2.6 Sanitation promotion agent – year 5

The Water Services Act does not explicitly state a requirement for this agent, hence it is unlikely that such a person/institution will be appointed to carry out this function in RLM. However, if included in the WSDP as a function of Health, it could probably be accommodated as a Social and Environmental (Health) issue.

7.1.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Water Services Institutional Arrangements)

The following gaps need to be addressed:

• Service to Zenzele Informal area. • Lack of sufficient staffing capacity for pump stations: Due to limited staff capacity at the

existing pump stations in Toekomsrus, Kocksoord and Helikon Park, management of overtime and manning of screens (24 hours) is a problem.

• The previous contract regarding the Westonaria treatment works has expired and needs renewal.

• The Randfontein WWTW requires upgrading. • Sewer blockages occur regularly. • Compliance with licensing requirements and exemption permit conditions. • Water services agreement with Rand Water to resolve sale of water to mines. • Promotion of health and hygiene awareness by the health authorities. • Service delivery agreements with Sediba and Westonaria.

7.1.4 Implementation Strategies (Water Services Institutional Arrangements)

• Service to Zenzele Informal area: - The informal area of Zenzele, which originated as a transfer site for people leaving

from extension seven in Mohlakeng, is in dire need of sanitation services. The development of the alternate housing sites needs to be implemented to enable the residents of this area to be relocated. Plans for the establishment of new townships for informal settlements to be relocated to have already reached a point where the process of land acquisition has commenced (Middelvlei Township). Planning for bulk services has already commenced and it is envisaged that construction will start within the next year.

• Lack of sufficient staffing capacity for pump stations:

- While capacity is a serious shortfall at the pump stations, existing support staff is not encouraged enough to have multiple skills to be able to do maintenance of both the pumps and the filters. Strategies should include improvement of staffing levels as well as investigate and do a cost benefit analysis of using mechanical screens. Increased capacity may be produced through training and multi-skilling.



80 - Installation of a telemetry system at the reservoir sites will obviate the need for 24-hour

manning of these installations. These personnel will be redeployed to sewer pumping installations and a shift system implemented to manage and reduce the necessity for overtime work.

- Investigate incorporation into concession agreement with Rand Water.

• The previous contract regarding the Westonaria treatment works has expired: - A draft agreement with Westonaria for bulk wastewater has been available for some

time but has not been signed. It requires review.

• The Randfontein WWTW requires upgrading. It is proposed that: - A project be initiated to improve and rehabilitate the existing system, and

the agreement with Rand Water be continued.

• Sewer blockages occur regularly: - Preventative maintenance needs to be implemented, infrastructure upgraded and

rehabilitated where necessary.

• Compliance with licensing requirements and exemption permit conditions: - An environmental impact assessment is to be conducted and reports submitted to

DWAF.

• Water services agreement with Rand Water to resolve sale of water to mines: - A draft water services agreement with Rand Water is being considered to resolve this

issue to ensure that RLM receives due contribution from these users.

• Promotion of health and hygiene awareness by the health authorities: - Consideration should be given to promote health and hygiene awareness through

improved sanitation, a function which should be performed by the health authorities.

• Service delivery agreements with Sediba and Westonaria: - Currently, two service delivery agreements exist with Sediba and Westonaria, though

without properly drafted contracts. This situation should be remedied. 8. CUSTOMER SERVICES PROFILE

8.1 Customer Services Profile

Situation Assessment (Customer Services)


Budget Bylaws Infrastructure Personnel Quality of service for water: urban Yes Yes Yes Yes Quality of service for water: rural Yes Yes No No Attending to complaints for water: urban Yes Yes Yes Yes Attending to complaints for water: rural Yes No Yes No Attending to complaints for sanitation: urban

Yes Yes Yes Yes

Attending to complaints for sanitation: rural Yes No No No Education for basic water services No N/A Yes No Pollution awareness No N/A Yes No



81 8.1.1.1 Quality of service for water: urban

Record: Prior

Cur

rent

20

05/0

6

2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

1. Total no. of consumers 128 842 2. No. of consumers experiencing greater

than 7 days interruption in supply per year

0 0 0 0 0 0

3. No. of consumers receiving flow rate of less than 10 litres per minute

± 3100 (Estimated 500 informal dwellings)

4. Water quality: no chlorination N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5. Water quality: chlorinated N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6. Water quality: full treatment All consumers

8.1.1.2 Quality of service for water: rural

RLM does not provide a rural water reticulation service, thus no information regarding the quality of water services, specifically regarding rural consumers, is available.

8.1.1.3 Attending to complaints for water: urban

Record: Prior

Cur

rent

20

05/0

6

2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

1. Total number of consumer units 17 840 2. No. Complaints of quality of

service per year divided by total number of consumer units - *# of queries/CU

0.127*

3. Number of queries received within the year

2267 2940 2457 No Records

4. % Queries responded to within 24 hours

99 99 99 No Records

5. Number of major or visible leaks reported within the year

605 646 340 No Records

6. % Major or visible leaks repaired within 48 hours after being reported.


* This proportion relates to queries received, which are mostly not complaints regarding quality

of service. Information regarding complaints re quality is not available. 8.1.1.4 Attending to complaints for water: rural

RLM does not provide a rural water reticulation service, and do not respond to any rural situation.



82 8.1.1.5 Attending to complaints for sanitation: urban

Record: Prior

Discharge to treatment works

Cur

rent

20

05/0

6

2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

Number of queries/ complaints received within the year

3438 3955 2879 No Records

3438 3955

% Queries responded to within 24 hours

99 99 99 No Records

99 99

Number of blockages reported within the year

3281 3682 2744 No Records

3281 3682

% Blockages repaired within 48 hours after being reported


100 100

No. Complaints per year divided by total number of consumer units

No Records

Pit/tank pumping Number of pits/ tanks Number of calls received within the year for emptying Number of calls received within the year for emergency maintenance to pits/ tanks

8.1.1.6 Attending to complaints for sanitation: rural

RLM does not have any rural sewer reticulation and do not keep any records in this regard. However, RLM very recently obtained a new vacuum tanker and provides a basic service, while such a service is also provided by private operators. The very low figures above reflect the current situation.

8.1.1.7 Education for basic water services

RLM is presently undergoing organisational restructuring. No provision has been made in the structure for a water & sanitation awareness officer. Due to budgetary constraints it is unlikely that such an officer can be appointed within the foreseeable future. Consideration is however given to incorporate an awareness program into current HIV-AIDS awareness programmes.

8.1.1.8 Pollution awareness

Does the WSA have a pollution awareness programme?

Yes No X

If no, when will such a programme be in place?

Unknown

8.1.2 Future Trends and Goals (Customer Services)

See discussion in 8.1.4 below.



83 8.1.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Customer Services)

The municipality is lacking sufficient capacity to deal with maintenance challenges due to serious understaffing. It is a concern of the engineering services that contract workers, such as meter readers, are not optimally utilised. It was the suggestion of the municipality that meter readers could be trained to also take care of minor meter leaks. In most cases the municipality reacts to problems rather than planning ahead and executing preventative measures. Some functions, such as meter reading, which relates to the operations of the technical services department, are misplaced in the organisational structure and these results in management problems. It is a suggestion of the municipality to consider transferring meter reading function from the Finance department to the Infrastructure department. Water demand management is a critical function for a water services authority but the Randfontein municipality has no provision in the existing structure for a water demand / water management section to focus on water losses.

8.1.4 Implementation Strategies (Customer Services)

Strategies reported elsewhere, e.g. pro-active actions like a leak-repair program, will have the effect of improving customer service, both by providing a more stable service as well as lowering the complaints received. Preventative measures as stated above, the finalisation of the organisational structure (with provision of additional staff needed) and the implementation of a water demand management plan will ensure effective, efficient and sustainable customer services.

9. FINANCIAL PROFILE

9.1 Capital Funds

9.1.1 Situation Assessment (Capital Funds) 9.1.1.1 Capital expenditure: water

Record: Prior

Cur

rent

20

05/0

6

2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

U R U R U R U R U R U R

1. Internal infrastructure 12070637 900830 2. Connector infrastructure 3. Bulk infrastructure 3418191 4. Other 1153950 5. Total (1+2+3+4) 13224587 0 900830 1514420 3418191 6. Cost per connection (item 5

divided by number of new connections being provided)



84 9.1.1.2 Capital expenditure: sanitation

Record: Prior

Cur

rent

20

05/0

6

2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

U R U R U R U R U R U R

1. Internal infrastructure 855233

2. Connector infrastructure

3. Bulk infrastructure 229402

4. VIP toilets & other dry sanitation system

5. Soft issues (training, H&HE and awareness)

6. Other 124000

7. Total (1+2+3+4) 353402 855233

8. Cost per connection (item 5 divided by number of new connec-tions being provided)

Specific information regarding “Rural” is not available.

Sources of capital income

All funding for water services in Randfontein is obtained from the MIG Programme. Counter funding for MIG funds is budgeted from internal sources. Funding for the development of township internal infrastructure is budgeted by the Department of Housing. This funding is administered by the Department of Housing as they manage the housing projects. Other funding is obtained from Capacity Building Grants.

Category Type of income Grant funding from national government

• Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG) Capacity Building Grant DWAF (Updating of WSDP)

• Equitable Share allocations Funding available from local government itself

• West Rand District Municipality Grants • RLM Capital Budget Provisions

Consumer contributions

• Ad hoc water & sewer analyses for densification developments

Ad hoc private sector sources

• Bulk service contributions (Not implemented yet. Contribution formulae currently under development).

9.1.1.3 Sources of capital income: water

The source of capital funding for sanitation, as stated above for water, is also the MIG Programme. Counter funding for MIG funds is budgeted from internal sources. Funding for the development of township internal infrastructure is budgeted by the Department of Housing. This funding is administered by the Department of Housing as they manage the housing projects. Other funding is obtained from Capacity Building Grants.



85

Record: Prior Current 2005/06 2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

Subsidies 1. Housing 2. CMIP 3. CWSS (from DWAF) 2783000 790200 2700000 4. Sub-total: subsidies 2783000 790200 2700000 Other income 5. Other ad hoc grants which may

become available 1350000 1514420

6. Consumer payments 7. Expenditure from current income 8. Sub-total (5 + 6 + 7): 1350000 1514420 Loans 9. Capital development fund 10. External 11. Sub-total: loans 12. Total (4 + 8 + 11) 4133000 790200 1514420 2700000

9.1.1.4 Sources of capital income: sanitation


Subsidies 1. Housing 2. CMIP 1231200 855233 3. CWSS (from DWAF) 4. Sub-total: subsidies 1231200 855233 Other income 5. Other ad hoc grants which

may become available 124000

6. Consumer payments 7. Expenditure from current

income

8. Sub-total (5 + 6 + 7): 124000 Loans 9. Capital development fund 10. External 11. Sub-total: loans 12. Total (4 + 8 + 11) 1355200 9.1.2 Future Trends and Goals (Capital Funds)

The current practices in terms of capital funding will continue. Developers contribute towards their required services through development levies, while housing programmes provide for new housing services within the program. Other requirements will be budgeted through the MIG program with internal counter funding.



86 9.1.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Capital Funds)

The Directorate: Finance determines and addresses the strategic gaps in the funding of services, including, capital, operating, rates & tariffs, etc.

9.1.4 Implementation Strategies (Capital Funds)

The Directorate: Finance determines the affordability of capital and operating expenditure and provides the framework within which budgeting is done, determining the extent of loans and expenditure from internal sources that are affordable.

9.2 Operating Costs and Income

9.2.1 Situation Assessment (Operating costs & income) 9.2.1.1 Operating costs: water

Record: Prior Current

2005/06 2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01 1. Purchase of bulk water (06/07) R 25200000

24000000 24346038 22714106 19713865 15397785

2. Production costs (raw water if from own sources)

n.a.

3. Production costs (treatment system)

n.a.

4. Operating costs (including overheads, salaries and wages, maintenance and depreciation) * * (06/07) R 40349900

38042900 * 27680706 24542593 24504747 20168261

5. Finance charges none 6. Other none 7. Total costs (1 + 2 + 3 +

4 + 5 + 6) 62042900 52026744 47256699 44218612 35566046

8. Operating costs per consumer unit

* Includes working capital of R6750000 and free water (6kl) of R2700000 ** 06/07 incl. working capital of R7188800 and free water of R2835000 n.a. – not applicable



87 9.2.1.2 Operating costs: sanitation


2005/06 2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01 1. Treatment costs (06/07) R6665000

6200000 8197774 7814642 N/A* N/A*

Operating costs (including overheads, salaries and wages, soft issues moni-toring, maintenance (pit emptying & de-sludging) and depreciation) (06/07) 10933100

10211100

5124602 3130056 10102017** 8111166**

2. Finance charges none 3. Other 4. Total costs (1 + 2 + 3 + 4) 16411100 13322376 10944698 5. Operating costs per

consumer unit

* Separate treatment costs are not available for these years - The previous financial system is unable to extract this level of detail ** Total operating cost includes treatment cost for these years NOTE: Reallocated internal support services costs not included 9.2.1.3 Operating income: subsidies


1. Equitable share allocation (06/07) 31,000,000

25400000 13000000

2. % Equitable Share allocated to basic water supply (06/07) 9.7%

11.2 N/A

3. % Equitable Share allocated to basic sanitation provided 7.2%

8.3 N/A

4. % Of other subsidies allocated to basic water supply

n.a. n.a.

5. % Of other subsidies allocated to basic sanitation provision

n.a. n.a.

Equitable share includes free water allocation and indigent subsidy, also for sanitation N/A = Not Available n.a. = Not applicable



88 9.2.1.4 Operating income: tariffs 9.2.2 Future Trends and Goals (Operating cost & income)

The budgeted increases in all the cost elements as mentioned above are at the following rates:

2006/07 - 6.5%; 2007/08 - 6%; 2008/09 - 6%.

9.2.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Operating cost & income)

See comments as per Capital Budget.

9.2.4 Implementation Strategies (Operating cost & income)

See comments as per Capital Budget.

9.3 Tariff & Charges: Residential

9.3.1 Situation Assessment (Tariff & Charges)

NOTE: All tariffs below excl. VAT 9.3.1.1 Fixed charges: residential (per month) for water


1. Communal water supply - - 2. Controlled volume supply - - 3. Uncontrolled volume supply 0.49* n.a.

*Once off monthly charge per developed erf. 9.3.1.2 Fixed charges: residential (per month) for sanitation


1. Consumer installations: VIP or equivalent

n.a.

2. Consumer installations: Wet (septic tanks etc.)

7.05-55.49 * plus 32.48

(built)

3. Discharge to water treatment works (intermediate or full waterborne)

* Per property size (0-500m² to 8001 – 8500m²)



89 9.3.1.3 Volume charges or other charge mechanisms: residential sanitation


2005/06 2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01 1. Consumer installations: VIP

or equivalent -

2. Consumer installations: Wet (septic tanks etc.)

-

3. Discharge to water treatment works (intermediate or full waterborne)

0.33/kl (over 150kl)

9.3.1.4 Block tariffs: residential (cents/kl) for water

Record: Prior Service Level

Block Block definition

Current 2005/06 2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

1(a) Free Basic Water

0-6kl - n.a. n.a. Communal Water Supply 1(b) Not Free

Basic Water *


0-6kl - 2.99

1(b) Not Free Basic Water*

2 3

Controlled Volume Supply


1(b) Not Free Basic Water *

2 7-15kl 7.04 6.61 3 16-30kl 7.78 7.24 4 >31kl 8.31 7.55 5

Uncontrolled Volume Supply

9.3.2 Future Trends and Goals (Tariff & Charges)

The future tariffs and charges for Water and Sanitation, as approved by the RLM Council, are shown below.



90 Water tariffs

Water

2005/2006 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009

Vacant Stands - Basic Charge (per month) per kl 8,87 9,45 10,06 10,71 Residential - 0 to 6 (@ Rand Water costs) - - - - - 7 to 15 7,04 7,50 7,99 8,51 - 16 to 30 7,78 8,36 8,99 9,66 - 31 and more 8,31 9,14 10,05 11,06 Business / Industrial - 0 to 100 7,44 8,00 8,60 9,25 - 101 and more 6,92 7,61 8,37 9,21 Schools / Churches / Welfare - 1 and more 6,36 6,77 7,21 7,68

The tariff increase for the 2006/2007 financial year ranges from 0 % to 10 %, based on usage and for the 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 increase of 6,5% and 6,5% respectively. The 6 kl free basic water is accorded to all consumers. The stepped tariff for domestic consumers is intended to encourage savings in water usage. Low consumers will pay less and large consumers will pay more.



91 Sewer tariffs

SEWER 2005/2006 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009

Levy on land size for all consumers

0 – 500 7,05 7,51 8,00 8,52 501 – 1000 10,39 11,07 11,79 12,56 1001 – 1500 13,50 14,38 15,31 16,31 1501 – 2000 16,74 17,83 18,99 20,22 2001 – 2500 19,96 21,26 22,64 24,11 2501 – 3000 23,20 24,71 26,31 28,02 3001 – 3500 26,43 28,15 29,98 31,93 3501 – 4000 29,65 31,58 33,63 35,82 4001 – 4500 32,89 35,03 37,30 39,72 4501 – 5000 36,10 38,45 40,94 32,95 5001 – 5500 39,34 41,90 44,62 47,52 5501 – 6000 42,57 45,34 48,29 51,43 6001 – 6500 45,80 48,78 51,95 55,33 6501 – 7000 49,03 52,22 55,61 59,22 7501 – 8000 52,25 55,65 59,27 63,12 8001 – 8500 55,49 59,10 62,94 67,03

Bulk water per k/l over 150 k/l 0,33 0,35 0,37 0,39 Additional levy House 32,48 34,59 36,84 39,23 Business per point 35,72 38,04 40,51 43,14 Bulk water per k/l over 150 k/l 1,35 1,44 1,53 1,63

The tariff increases for the 2006/2007 financial year is 6,5 %, while the increase for 2007/2008 and for 2008/2009 financial years is 6.5 % and 6,5 % respectively.

9.3.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Tariff & Charges)

Strategic gaps are determined as part of the multi-year budget.

9.3.4 Implementation Strategies (Tariff & Charges)

Based on the strategic gaps as determined as part of the multi-year budget, future tariffs and charges are to be implemented as set out in the tables above.

9.4 Free Basic Water and Sanitation

9.4.1 Situation Assessment (Free Basic Water and Sanitation)



92 9.4.1.1 Subsidy targeting approach for free basic water

Subsidy targeting approach Percentage of households targeted

1. Rising block tariff 100% 2. Service level targeting 0% 3. Credits to water account n.a 4. Other

9.4.1.2 Subsidy targeting approach for free basic sanitation

Subsidy targeting approach Percentage of households targeted 5. Rising block tariff 100% 6. Service level targeting 0% 7. Credits to water account n.a 8. Other

9.4.2 Future Trends and Goals (Free Basic Water and Sanitation)

RLM will continue with the free basic water and sanitation provision as currently provided.

9.4.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Free Basic Water and Sanitation)

The free water allocation will be continued to be applied in future.

9.4.4 Implementation Strategies (Free Basic Water and Sanitation)

The free water allocation will be continued to be applied in future.

9.5 Charges and Block Tariffs: Industrial & Commercial

The discussions and tables in section 9.3 also contain the relevant information regarding Industrial and Commercial. The table in 9.3.2 also reflects the future I & C tariffs.

9.5.1 Situation Assessment (Charges & Block Tariffs) 9.5.1.1 Fixed charges and block tariffs: industrial for water

Record: Prior Block

definition Current 2005/06 2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

1. Fixed monthly charge Developed 0.49 N/A 2. Volume charge a) 0-100 7.44 b) >100 6.92



93 9.5.1.2 Fixed charges and block tariffs: industrial for wastewater

Record: Prior Block


1. Fixed monthly charge 0-500m² To 8001-8500m²

7.05-55.49 * plus 35.72 (built)

N/A

2. Volume charge >150kl 1.35 a) b)

9.5.1.3 Fixed charges and block tariffs: commercial for water

Record: Prior Block definition

Current 2005/06 2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

1. Fixed monthly charge Developed 0.49 N/A 2. Volume charge a) 0-100 7.44 b) >100 6.92

9.5.1.4 Fixed charges and block tariffs: commercial for wastewater


Current 2005/06 2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

1. Fixed monthly charge 0-500m² To 8001-8500m²

7.05-55.49 * plus 35.72 (built)

N/A

2. Volume charge >150kl 1.35 a) b)

9.5.1.5 Fixed charges and block tariffs: other for water


Current 2005/06 2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01

1. Fixed monthly charge Developed 0.55 2. Volume charge 6.36 a) b) c)

9.5.1.6 Fixed charges and block tariffs: other for sanitation

Record: Prior Block


1. Fixed monthly charge n.a. 2. Volume charge n.a. a) b) c)



94

9.5.2 Future Trends And Goals (Charges & Block Tariffs)

Fixed charges and block tariffs are already in place and are reviewed annually. See section 9.3.2 for details.

9.5.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Charges & Block Tariffs)

The comments as per 9.3.3. is applicable.

9.5.4 Implementation Strategies (Charges & Block Tariffs)

The comments as per 9.3.4. is applicable. Should an affordability study be approved (as recommended previously), the results will inform the determination of future tariffs.

9.6 Income And Sales

9.6.1 Situation Assessment (Income and Sales)

Resources to provide income and sales functions.


Budgets Bylaws Infra-structure Personnel 1. Total income (and non-payment) and

expenditure: water Y Y Y Y*

2. Total income (and non-payment) and expenditure: sanitation

Y Y Y Y*

3. Sales arrangements Y Y Y Y*

*Staff shortages - Management capacity and supervisory



95 9.6.1.1 Total income (and non-payment) and expenditure: water

There is no information available regarding reasons for non-payment or affordability. Such a study should be considered for the future. Provision has not been made for such study in the immediate future, although the need has been acknowledged and discussed earlier in this report.


2005/06 2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01 1. Total income (billed

income and subsidies) (06/07) - R40044000 (no subsidies)

37600000 38865595 31848164 28833653 23014767

2. Actual income received (06/07) - R 32855200

30850000 N/A

3. % Non-payment 17.95 4. Non-payment by

residential consumers N/A

5. Non-payment by commercial consumers

N/A

6. Non-payment by industrial consumers

N/A

7. Non-payment by other consumers

N/A

8. Total non-payment (4+5+6+7)

6750000

9. Operating expenditure 62042900 52026744 47256699 44218612 35566046 10. Capital expenditure 13224587 0 900830 1514420 3418191 11. Total expenditure

(9+10) 82017487 52026744 48157529 45733032 38984237

12. Equitable share allocated to water supply

2850000

13. Surplus (deficit) (2 minus 11)

-51167487



96 9.6.1.2 Total income (and non-payment) and expenditure: sanitation


1. Total income (billed income and subsidies) (06/07) - R12385900

11630000 14271207 12774298 8545017 9158042

2. Actual income (06/07) - R10756900

10100000 N/A N/A

3. % Non-payment 13.15 4. Non-payment by

residential consumer N/A N/A N/A

5. Non-payment by commercial consumers

N/A N/A N/A

6. Non-payment by industrial consumers

N/A N/A N/A

7. Non-payment by other consumers

N/A N/A N/A

8. Total non-payment (4+5+6+7)

1530000 N/A N/A

9. Operating expenditure 16411100 13322376 10944698 10. Capital expenditure 353402 855233 0 11. Total expenditure

(9+10) 16764502 855233 10944698

12. Equitable share allocated to sanitation supply

2100000 N/A N/A

13. Surplus (deficit) (2 minus 11)

-6664502 N/A N/A

9.6.1.3 Sales arrangements

• The billing system for RLM is computerized and combined for all services. • Bills are mostly sent by mail, but some are hand-delivered. • Collection of payment happens at Council offices. “Payday” has already been

implemented to provide ease of payment. • A clear policy is in place which spells out action that will be taken to collect debts. • To improve billing, i.e. to assist the billed consumer, a changed user-friendly lay-out for the

bill is to be introduced shortly. 9.6.2 Future Trends and Goals

As mentioned before, a study into non-payment, affordability and the effect of the block tariffs should provide better understanding and would provide information towards determining future income, expenditure and affordability levels. While the “Payday”–system of payment is already in place, arrangements are being planned to allow payment at Post Offices.

9.6.3 Strategic Gap Analysis

The strategic gap would be determined through the study as discussed above.



97 9.6.4 Implementation Strategies

While financial provision has not been made to date, funds should be made available in a future budget to undertake the study into non-payment, affordability and the effect of the block tariffs.

9.7 Metering and Billing

9.7.1 Situation Assessment (Metering and Billing) 9.7.1.1 Metering and billing: urban


2005/06 2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01 Communal supply 1. % Communal standpipes

metered 100

2. % Communal standpipes metered (prepaid) (none existing)

Controlled volume supply 3. % Consumers billed monthly Uncontrolled volume supply none 4. % Consumers billed monthly 100 5. % Consumers meters read

monthly N/A

6. % Consumers consumption estimated

N/A

Pay points 7. No. Billed consumer units/pay

point 4665

8. No. Prepaid consumer units/outlet

0

General 9. Number of new meters

installations

10. % Meters tested Negligible 11. % Meters replaced n.a.



98 9.7.1.2 Metering and billing: rural dense

Services provided include metering and billing to 88 smallholdings.


2005/06 2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01 Communal supply 1. % Communal standpipes metered 2. % Communal standpipes metered

(prepaid)

Controlled volume supply 3. % Consumers billed monthly Uncontrolled volume supply 4. % Consumers billed monthly 100 5. % Consumers meters read monthly N/A 6. % Consumers consumption

estimated N/A

Pay points - as above 7. No. Billed consumer units/pay point 8. No. Prepaid consumer units/outlet General 9. Number of new meters installations N/A 10. % Meters tested 11. % Meters replaced

9.7.1.3 Metering and billing: rural villages

This is not applicable to Randfontein.

9.7.1.4 Metering and billing: rural scattered

This is not applicable to Randfontein.

9.7.1.5 Metering and billing: rural farmland

No municipal services are provided to farms. 9.7.2 Future Trends And Goals (Metering and Billing) 9.7.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Metering and Billing) 9.7.4 Implementation Strategies (Metering and Billing)

No information is available regarding future trend, gaps and strategies regarding Metering and Billing.



99 10. LIST OF PROJECTS

10.1 Projects

10.1.1 Situation Assessment (Projects) 10.1.1.1 Annual water and sanitation project list

Project name Settlement type

Water/ sanitation

Project type (e.g. reticu-lation, bulk,

etc.)

Amount R Funding source Year

Droogeheuvel outfall sewer Urban S Bulk 2 547 200.00 MIG 2006/07 Middelvlei outfall sewer Urban S Bulk 14 242 000.00 MIG 2007/08 Mohlakeng-Finsbury water pressure zoning Urban W Bulk 3 172 620.00 MIG 2005/06

Upgrading of Mohlakeng outfall sewer Urban S Bulk 1 231 200.00 MIG 2005/06

Upgrading of Mohlakeng outfall sewer (phase 2) Urban S Bulk 2 000 000.00 MIG 2006/07

Droogeheuvel bulk water supply Urban W Bulk 17 800 000.00 MIG 2008-10

Middelvlei bulk water supply Urban W Bulk 5 850 000.00 MIG 2006/07 Badirile bulk water supply Urban rural W Bulk 9 789 103.00 MIG 2005–07 Projects funded and imple-mented by Department of Housing

Mohlakeng ext. 3 water & sewer reticulation Urban W & S Reticulation 2 512 643.22 Dept of Housing 2005/06

Mohlakeng ext. 3 construction of toilet structures Urban S Reticulation 1 742 517.16 Dept of Housing 2005/06

Mohlakeng ext 7 & 8 water & sewer reticulation Urban W & S Reticulation 3 851 665.24 Dept of Housing 2005/06

Mohlakeng ext. 7 & 8 construction of toilet structures Urban S Reticulation 3 963 811.14 Dept of Housing 2005/06

12 070 636.76 Projects pending for funding by Department of Housing

Badirile water & sewer reticulation Urban W & S Reticulation Dept of Housing 2007/08

10.1.1.2 WSA sustainability project list

This is not applicable to the RLM at present.

10.1.1.3 Proposed WSDP projects for inclusion in IDP (IDP format)

The projects as per the projects list have not been provided in the IDP format. The projects do form part of the RLM Council’s budget and IDP.

10.1.2 Future Trends and Goals (Projects)

As future needs are identified, these needs will be addressed through the annual three year budget process. As far as possible, MIG funds are utilised for the provision of service needs, with own internal funding being utilised for counter-funding. This practice will be continued in an effort to maximise the expenditure capabilities of Council for service provision.



100 10.1.3 Strategic Gap Analysis (Projects)

Some projects are required in future, which are not currently included in the budget. These are shown in the table below.

10.1.4 Implementation Strategies (Projects)

The projects as shown below need to be placed on future budgets. Where required, preliminary planning and cost estimates need to be completed.

Project name Settlement type

Water/ sanitation

Project type (e.g.

reticulation, bulk, etc.)

Amount R Funding source Year

Zone Metering Urban W Reticulation 1 700 000.00 MIG 2008/09 Pressure Reduction: Greenhills Ext. 3 Urban W Reticulation 250 000.00 Internal (Cap) 2007/08

Upgrading water reticulation: Mohlakeng Urban W Reticulation 300 000.00 p.a. Internal (O & M) Continuous

Droogeheuvel internal reticulation

Urban W & S Reticulation To be determined Dept of Housing 2010 On

Middelvlei internal reticulation

Urban W & S Reticulation To be determined Dept of Housing 2007/08

Badirile internal reticulation Urban W & S Reticulation To be determined Dept of Housing 2007/08 Phasing out of Toekomsrus Pump Station Urban S Reticulation 1 500 000.00 Internal (Cap) When Req.

Phasing out of Finsbury Pump Station Urban S Reticulation Included Droogeheuvel

Outfall Sewer MIG 2006/07

Phasing out of Kocksoord Pump Station Urban S Reticulation MIG 2007/08

Phasing out of Erf 16 Aureus Pump Station Urban S Reticulation

Included Middelvlei Outfall Sewer MIG 2007/08



Documents

Randfontein Local Municipality Water Services Development Plan