Upload
others
View
9
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
RANKINE CYCLER, STEAM TURBINE POWER SYSTEM
Kelsea Hubka, Hunter Cressman, Andrew Braum, & Ramzi Daouk
Mechanical Engineering Department
Loyola Marymount University
Los Angeles, California 90045
February 14, 2008
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this lab was to gain an understanding of the thermodynamic performance of the
Rankine Cycle. By gaining an understanding of the Rankine Cycle, similar analyses can be
applied for application in power generation. Energy analysis was performed on the cycle as a
whole and on the individual components. By using the first law of thermodynamics for open
systems, analysis was performed on the boiler, turbine, and condenser. Key results included an
expected isentropic power of 8261 watts, condenser heat loss was 126 watts, power generated
was 1.61 watts, turbine isentropic efficiency was 0.0195%, Rankine Cycle thermal efficiency
was 0.0186%, and the estimated time to boiling was 26 minutes and 51 seconds. Conclusions
suggest that entropy losses from the boiler to the turbine were due to irreversibilities in the cycle.
Recommendations included rerunning experiment with a more efficient turbine, and also using a
true Rankine Cycle with pump. Note the current setup did not include a pump in the cycle. The
results of this lab were intended to parallel applications in power generation.
Proofread by,
Andrew MacDonell
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page:
Introduction 3
Theory and Analysis 4
Experimental Procedure 10
Results and Discussion 13
Conclusion and Recommendations 20
References 21
Appendices 22
Appendix A: Raw Data & Charts 23
Appendix B: Meeting Times & Sample Calculations 32
3
INTRODUCTION
The objective of this experiment is to understand the thermodynamic performance of a Turbine
Technologies Rankine Cycler System and to understand the details of each component which
composes the system. The analysis will include performing an energy balance on the cycle and
each individual constituent. The Rankine Cycler Steam Turbine Power System is composed of
the following parts: the cooling tower, the boiler, the generator, the steam turbine, the steam
admission valve, and the gas valve. In preparation for this experiment, six liters of water are
poured inside of the boiler. Once the water reaches boiling at a high temperature and pressure,
the steam admission valve must be opened to allow for the steam to pass through the turbine.
This produces power which is recorded as current and voltage as a function of time. Readings
are taken for around thirty minutes and are collected in a data acquisition system. From the
cooling tower, a thick cloud of condensed vapor can be observed. The data recorded is plotted
and analyzed to determine the efficiency of the system. Using the first law of thermodynamics,
the turbine power, the turbine efficiency, the heat transfer to the boiler and from the condenser at
steady-state conditions, the Rankine Cycle efficiency, and the time it takes for the water to boil
inside of the boiler can be found. The boiler, before the valve is opened, can be viewed as a
closed system to determine the time it takes for the water to boil inside of the boiler. However,
once the valve is opened, each component under analysis must be viewed as an open system.
The efficiency of the generator is expected to be very low. The efficiency of the turbine is also
expected to be low. The total efficiency of the cycle is expected to be relatively low. These
results will be used to determine the performance of the Rankine Cycler system. These results
will provide the basis for a better understanding of the Rankine Cycle which can be applied to
power generation.
4
THEORY AND ANALYSIS
The Rankine Cycler, or Steam Turbine Power System, is an ideal isentropic thermodynamic
process which generates electrical power by using steam as the working fluid. This cycle does
not involve any internal irreversibilities and consists of the following four processes: constant
pressure heat addition in a boiler, isentropic expansion in a turbine, constant pressure heat
rejection in a condenser, and isentropic compression in a pump (Çengel, 2008). Inside the high-
pressurized boiler, superheated vapor is produced from the heat of burning fuel, in this case
propane gas. Assuming an open system, the high pressure forces the superheated vapor to the
turbine where it expands isentropically and work is produced by the rotation of the turbine shaft
(Çengel, 2008). This rotation spins a generator, transforming this mechanical energy into
electrical power. The water vapor then exits into a condenser where the saturated vapors cool
into a saturated liquid by rejecting heat to a cooling medium such as a lake or the atmosphere
(dry cooling in a large open tower) (Çengel, 2008). The liquid then moves through a pump,
before returning to the boiler as a compressed liquid. This process is cyclical, thus creating a
steady flow. A schematic diagram of this cycle is shown in Figure 1.
5
Figure 1 – Schematic of simple ideal Rankine cycle (Saniei, 2008).
The Carnot vapor cycle is a good model to approximate and compare actual devices; however
the Rankine cycle is more efficient in producing working fluid at completely saturated states,
thus making it a more accurate model (Çengel, 2008). In order to analyze the cycle, the
properties at every inlet and exit of each component must be measured. These properties can be
used compute the accuracy and efficiency of energy transfer throughout a Rankine Cycler. For
this energy analysis the first law of thermodynamics, energy conservation, is used. It is stated as
follows (Saniei, 2008):
6
..
22
)2
()2
(vc
ee
eeii
iit
Uzg
vhmWQzg
vhm
∂∂
⋅⋅++⋅+=+⋅++⋅ &&&& (1)
where, m& = mass flow, kilograms per second, kg/s
h = enthalpy, kilojoules per kilogram, kJ/kg
v = velocity, meters per second, m/s
g =gravity constant, meters per second squared, m/s2
z = height position, meters, m
Q& = heat flow, Joules per second, J/s
W& = power, Watts, W
U = internal energy, kilojoules per kilogram, kJ/kg
t = time, seconds, s
i = inlet
e = exit
c.v. = control volume
Assuming all systems are in a steady state and have steady flow (S.S.S.F.), the first law of
thermodynamics can be reduced to a heat transfer equation to solve for energy exchange in a
boiler or condenser. Potential and kinetic energy changes of the working fluid are insignificant
relative to heat transfer, so the previous equation (1) can be reduced even further to (Saniei,
2008):
)( ie hhmQ −⋅= && (2)
where, Q& = heat flow, Joules per second, J/s
m& = mass flow rate, kilograms per second, kg/s
he = enthalpy at exit, kilojoules per kilogram, kJ/kg
hi = enthalpy at inlet, kilojoules per kilogram, kJ/kg
The first law of thermodynamics can also be reduced to an isentropic work equation. Potential
and kinetic energy changes of the working fluid are also insignificant relative to work. Therefore
to solve for the power produced by a turbine or the power consumed by a pump, equation (1) can
be reduced to (Saniei, 2008):
7
)( ei hhmW −⋅= && (3)
where, W& = power, Watts, W
m& = mass flow rate, kilograms per second, kg/s
hi = enthalpy at inlet, kilojoules per kilogram, kJ/kg
he = enthalpy at exit, kilojoules per kilogram, kJ/kg
It is important to understand how much heat in the boiler is required to superheat the compressed
liquid completely, because this energy promotes the flow of the entire cycle. It is also important
to know the time it takes for this maximum efficiency to first occur. The time it takes to first
meet this efficiency is the moment the cycle reaches a steady state and moves at a steady flow.
After this moment in time, the property values at each inlet and outlet of the entire cycle will be
most accurate. Before this time, temperature and pressure can vary greatly producing imprecise
results. This time is found first by simplifying the first law of thermodynamics for a closed
system. Work, and potential and kinetic energy changes of the working fluid remain
insignificant relative to heat transfer. Therefore the first law can be simplified to the following
equation (Saniei, 2008):
dt
dUQ =&
An integration and simplification of this equation is made:
∫∫ =⋅ dUdtQ&
ie UUtQ −=∆⋅&
The final result is an equation to calculate the time taken for a heat exchanging system (boiler) to
reach a steady state (Saniei, 2008):
8
⋅
−⋅=∆
Q
uumt ie
&
)( (4)
where, t∆ = power, Watts, W
m = mass flow rate, kilograms per second, kg/s
ui = specific internal energy at inlet, kJ/kg
ue = specific internal energy at exit, kJ/kg
Q& = heat flow, Joules per second, J/s
Also, the heat exchanged in the boiler is proportional to the cost of resources (propane gas),
which is accounted for in the total cost of the running system. This total cost is used to
determine the price being charged for consuming the power outputted by the generator. In order
to maximize the efficiency of the power output relative to the inputted energy, the efficiency of
the generator proportional to the turbine is calculated. The following equation is used to find the
efficiency of a generator (Saniei, 2008):
%100×=T
gen
genW
W
&
&
η (5)
where, genη = generator efficiency, percentage, %
genW& = power output recorded, Watts, W
TW& = power input by turbine, Watts, W
In addition, the efficiency of the generated power relative to the entire isentropic cycle is
calculated. The following equation is used to find the thermal efficiency of the cycle (Saniei,
2008):
%100×∆
=Q
Wgen
th
&
η (6)
where, thη = thermal efficiency, percentage, %
genW& = power output recorded, Watts, W
Q∆ = potential energy transfer, Joules per second, J/s
9
The following diagram (Figure 2) shows the thermodynamic process of the Rankine Cycle in
terms of temperature and entropy. It shows that the heat exchangers (boiler and condenser) are
always at steady temperature, verifying its steady state. Yet because this cycle is not Carnot, the
irreversibility of the turbine (useful work) creates a difference in entropy from the inlet to the
exit of the system. This is shown on the right side of the diagram. However, in the experimental
cycle analyzed, the pump does not exist. Instead, the boiler begins with a specified quantity of
working fluid, and is depleted from the system through a dry cooling tower. The system must
shut down before the entire fluid supply disappears. Although there appears to be a major
discrepancy in the cycle, all theory holds true.
Figure 2 – T-s Diagram of Rankine Cycle (Engineers Edge, 2008).
10
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
The following materials were used for the experiment:
• Turbine Technologies Rankine Cycler System (Figure 3)
The subsequent procedure was followed in order to obtain data to determine several parameters
of the Rankine Cycler system. These parameters included, but were not limited to, the
following: turbine efficiency, Rankine Cycle efficiency, and the time it took for water to boil
inside of the boiler. The following step by step procedure was used:
1. Supplied power to the computer and Rankine Cycler. Turned on the computer.
2. Locked the caster wheels, opened the steam admission valve, and verified the load and
burner switches were in the off position.
3. Filled the boiler with 6 liters of water.
4. Closed the steam admission valve.
5. Turned the load rheostat knob to the fully counter clockwise position (minimum load)
6. Opened the valve on the LP gas cylinder. Turned the gas valve knob CCW to the ON
position
7. Turned the master switch ON.
8. Turned the burner switch ON.
9. Observed the voltmeter and opened the steam admission valve. Regulated the turbine
speed to indicate 7-10 volts. This pre-heated the turbine components and pipes. Closed
the valve for 20 seconds and waited for boiler pressure to rise. Leaks were visible due to
11
condensation and cold turbine bearing clearances. This was normal and stopped after
operating temperatures were attained.
10. Opened the steam admission valve to read a nearly maximum voltage.
11. Verified the upper water level was set to ¾ boiler door height.
12. Began recording the data using the data acquisition system.
13. When the boiler water level dropped to the lower level on the site glass, stopped
recording the data stream and turned the steam admission valve OFF.
14. Moved the burner switch to the OFF position. Turned the gas valve to the OFF position.
Turned the LP gas cylinder valve to the OFF position.
15. Held a heat resistant measuring beaker under the condenser for draining purposes.
Drained the condenser by squeezing the hose. Measured the condensate.
16. Waited until the boiler cooled and the pressure was below 10 PSIG, then opened the
steam admission valve. When the boiler pressure was equal to atmospheric pressure,
filled a measuring beaker with distilled water and re-filled the boiler through the drain/fill
port to the exact upper water level.
17. Nine readings of the sensor were obtained from the data acquisition system.
18. Shut off the master switch. Removed power from the entire system. Removed all water
from the system.
12
Figure 3. Picture of Turbine Technologies RankineCycler Steam Turbine Power System
(Hubka, 2008).
13
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
All raw data was placed in Appendix A along with sample calculations in Appendix B. All raw
data gathered during the experiment was tabulated in the following table.
With the final and initial volumes in the boiler measured, the volume of water moved through the
cycle was calculated from the difference between the two. The ambient enthalpy was referenced
from the ambient temperature at atmospheric pressure from tables found in a thermodynamics
book (Cengel & Boles, 2008). The start of the mass flow was depicted as a red line in the graph
below.
Table 1. Raw Data, 1/31/08, 1:30 pm
Vol Initial (L) Vol Final (L) Vol Condenser (L)
6.00 2.30 0.550
Ambient Temperature (°C) Ambient Enthalpy
(kJ/kg) Q Boiler (BTU/ft^3)
25.0 419.17 2600
Mass Water (L or kg) ∆Time (hr:min:s) Mass Flow (kg/s)
3.70 0:16:49 0.00367
14
With this data, the difference between the ending time and starting time was used to determine
the overall mass flow (total mass divided by total time).
Graph 1. Graph of turbine RPM vs. the Time with red line denoting when the water was
denoted as not flowing (left of line) and flowing (right of line).
15
Next, the steady state was identified on the turbine temperature graph above (Graph 2). Note the
temperature was nearly constant which ensured the water cycling through was not changing
state.
For the steady state time identified on the data, the averages of the boiler, turbine, and condenser
pressures and temperatures were taken. The temperature and pressures were each used to
identify the entropy for each of the components. The following table summarizes the results.
Graph 2. Steady state identification on turbine temperature graph.
16
Table 2 Boiler Pressure (kPa) Boiler Temp (°C) Entropy (kJ/kg-K)
Steady State 852 176 6.69
Averages from Turbine Pressure In (kPa) Turbine Temp In (°C) Entropy (kJ/kg-K)
3:55:00 to 188 119 7.15
3:58:42 Turbine Pressure Out (kPa) Turbine Temp Out (°C) Entropy (kJ/kg-K)
129 106 1.49
Condenser Pressure Out (kPa) Condenser Temp Out
(°C) Entropy (kJ/kg-K)
101 25.0 1.31
With the different entropy values recorded, a plot of the cycle was made on a T-s diagram. It
should be noted that the condenser out was considered to be atmospheric pressure and
temperature. This cycle, was in fact, not a closed cycle. Therefore, to create a closed cycle,
before the boiler, a constant temperature line was drawn across to where the pump entropy would
have been. A connecting line was also drawn from the turbine out to connect to the constant
entropy line ended. Results were plotted and displayed below.
Graph 3. Graph of T-s diagram assuming a closed cycle (Cengel & Boles, 2008)
17
Note on the T-s diagram, there was a large slant from the boiler to the turbine (top right to
bottom right). This change in entropy might be accounted for by the irreversibilities of the
turbine and the overall inefficiency of the cycle deviating from the ideal cycle.
Next the turbine pressures and temperatures were tabulated to fix the state again. This time, the
goal was to identify the enthalpies (Table 3). Using the enthalpies and equation 3, the isentropic
turbine power was calculated (Table 4). After referencing the ambient temperature and ambient
pressure as the condenser pressure and temperature, the condenser heat flow was calculated
using equation 2. Note that the results were negative due to heat flow leaving the control
volume. Results were tabulated below.
The turbine average current and voltage were taken for steady state conditions. With these
values, the turbine power generated was calculated by multiplying the voltage by the current.
Then by using equations 5 and 6, the turbine isentropic efficiency and Rankine Cycle thermal
efficiency was calculated, respectively. Calculations were tabulated along with the percent
differences of the efficiencies.
Table. 3
Steady State Turbine Pressure In (kPa) Turbine Temp In (°C) Enthalpy In (kJ/kg)
Averages from 187.95 118.64 2706
3:55:00 to Turbine Pressure Out (kPa) Turbine Temp Out (°C) Enthalpy Out (kJ/kg)
3:58:42 129.392 106.22 453
Table 4.
Isentropic Turbine Power (W) 8261
Condenser Heat Flow (J/s) -126
Table 5.
Turbine Power Generated (W) 1.61
Turbine Isentropic Efficiency (%) 0.0195
Thermal Efficiency (%) 0.0186
Efficiency Differences (%) 4.79
18
Lastly, using the starting time of the experiment to the start time of the mass flow, the boiler
pressures and temperatures were averaged. With the averages, the internal energies were
referenced (Cengel and Boles, 2008) and used in equation 4 to calculate the time to boiling.
Furthermore, graphs of boiler pressure, turbine in/out pressure (plotted together), boiler
temperature, turbine in/out temperature (plotted together), generator current, generator voltage,
fuel flow, and turbine RPM were all plotted with respect to time. Graphs were placed in
Appendix A along with the raw data.
Analysis resulted in extremely low efficiencies (<1%) which confirms expectations. Such a
small plant was not engineered to maximize efficiency, therefore yielding results discussed
above. Both the isentropic efficiency and thermal efficiency were close (5% difference), thus
solidifying confidence in the turbine analysis results. However, the estimated time to boiling
was about 27 minutes, which should have been around half that time (16 minutes based on data).
Table 6.
Time Boiler Pressure (kPa) Boiler Temp (°C) Internal Energy
(kJ/kg)
3:40:48 99 34 419
3:52:50 861.673 174 2579
Table 7.
Estimated Time (min) 26.85338 26 min and 51 sec
19
In terms of accuracy, the time was correct on the magnitude scale (time was not estimated as
seconds or hours).
20
CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS
The follow conclusions were made for the experiment:
• The entropies for each component were plotted on a T-s diagram which resembled
reference data for Rankine Cycles.
o The entropy loss from the boiler to the turbine was due to turbine irreversibilities.
• The turbine was expected to produce 8,261 watts of isentropic power.
• The condenser lost heat at a rate of 126 joules per second.
• The power generated was calculated to be 1.61 watts.
• The Isentropic efficiency was 0.0195% (extremely inefficient).
• The Rankine Cycle thermal efficiency was 0.0186% (extremely inefficient).
• Efficiency difference of <5% confirmed accurate inefficiencies.
• Estimated time to boiling was 27 minutes which was correct in magnitude to the actual
boiling time (around 16 minutes).
The following recommendations were made for the experiment:
• Rerun Rankine Cycle with new turbine to test for changes in efficiencies.
• Experiment with a true Rankin Cycle with the condensed water pumped back into the
boiler. Compare differences.
21
REFERENCES
Cengel, Y.A., & Boles, M.A. (2008). Thermodynamics, An Engineering Approach, Sixth
Edition. McGraw-Hill Companies Inc., New York, NY.
Engineers Edge (2008). “Heat Rejection – Thermodynamics.” [Online]
http://www.engineersedge.com/thermodynamics/heat_rejection.htm
Hubka, K. (2008). Pictures. Los Angeles, CA: Loyola Marymount University.
Saniei, N. (2008). Personal communication (lecture notes). Los Angeles, CA: Loyola
Marymount University.
Saniei, N., & Es-Said, O. (2007). Laboratory Manual, MECH 342 Mechanical Engineering Lab
II. Department of Mechanical Engineering. Los Angles, CA: Loyola Marymount
University.
22
APPENDICES