19
20/01/2014 1 Ranking climate change adaptation options through multi-criteria analysis Karianne de Bruin Senior Research Fellow – CICERO NZCCRI Seminar Series Wednesday 4 th December 2013 Decision support tools The Netherlands India Robust decision making Decision support tools Multicriteria analysis Costeffectiveness analysis Portfolio analysis Real options analysis Iterative risk (adaptive) management Costbenefit analysis

Ranking climate change adaptation options through multi ... · Ranking climate change adaptation options through multi-criteria analysis ... NZCCRI Seminar Series Wednesday 4 th December

  • Upload
    hamien

  • View
    217

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

20/01/2014

1

Ranking climate change adaptation options through multi-criteria analysis

Karianne de BruinSenior Research Fellow – CICERO

NZCCRI Seminar SeriesWednesday 4th December 2013

Decision support tools

The Netherlands

India

Robust decision makingDecision support 

tools

Multi‐criteria analysis

Cost‐effectiveness 

analysis

Portfolio analysis

Real options analysis

Iterative risk (adaptive) 

management

Cost‐benefit analysis

20/01/2014

2

Decision support tools

Robust decision making

Decision support tools

Multi‐criteria analysis

Cost‐effectiveness 

analysis

Portfolio analysis

Real options analysis

Iterative risk (adaptive) 

management

Cost‐benefit analysis

20/01/2014

3

Robust decision making

Decision support tools

Multi‐criteria analysis

Cost‐effectiveness 

analysis

Portfolio analysis

Real options analysis

Iterative risk (adaptive) 

management

Cost‐benefit analysis

Multi-Criteria Analysis

Approach that allows consideration of both quantitative and qualitative data in the ranking of alternative options

Systematic method for assessing and scoring options against a range of decision criteria

20/01/2014

4

Approach (1)

- Identify alternative options- Select criteria- Scores options against criteria- Assign weights to each criterion- Calculate weighted sum- Rank options

Approach (2)Urgency Feasibility Costs …

3 2 1

5

4 3

5 5

5

20/01/2014

5

Strengths

- Combine quantitative and qualitative data

- Transparent and simple method

- Involvement stakeholders

- Subjective scoring and weighting

- Analysis of uncertainty

Weaknesses

Application to adaptation

- Consideration of relevant criteria- Analysis with qualitative information

20/01/2014

6

Multi Criteria Adaptation Assessment in the Netherlands

Photo: Karianne de Bruin

Background (1)

Routeplanner project

- Formulation of adaptation options

- A qualitative assessment of adaptation options

- A quantitative assessment of adaptation options

20/01/2014

7

Background (2)

Project team

Environmental Economics and Natural Resources group – Wageningen University

In co-operation with: RIZA, RIKZ, ESA-WUR, Alterra, LEI, PRI, Erasmus University

Funding

BSIK program’s Climate change Spatial Planning, Living with Water, Habiforum

Governmental departments in cooperation with the Associations of Provincial Authorities, Netherlands Municipalities and Water Boards

Starting point

Climate change scenario relevant for the Netherlands for the period up to 2050

Source: KNMI, 2006

20/01/2014

8

Methodology

- Identification of adaptation options- Characteristics of the options- Definition of criteria- Determining the scores- Determining the weights

MCA for ranking the adaptation options

Identification options

96 adaptation options identified

Sectors:- Agriculture- Nature- Water- Energy & Transport- Housing & Infrastructure- Health- Recreation & Tourism

20/01/2014

9

Criteria for scoring (1)

Evaluation criteria

ImportanceUrgencyNo-regret characteristicsCo-benefitsEffect on mitigation

Criteria for scoring (2)

Feasibility criteria

Technical complexitySocial complexityInstitutional complexity

20/01/2014

10

Scoring

Options scored on evaluation and feasibility criteria by experts

Ranking

Ranking based on ordered criteria (e.g. 1 urgency, 2 importance, etc.)

Ranking based on criteria weighting (e.g. 40% importance, 20% urgency)

Criteria Ordering WeightsImportance 1 40%Urgency 2 20%No regret 3 15%Ancillary benefits 4 15%Mitigation effect 5 10%

Criteria Ordering WeightsImportance 1 40%Urgency 2 20%No regret 3 15%Ancillary benefits 4 15%Mitigation effect 5 10%

20/01/2014

11

Database

Results (1)

Highest priority (weighted summation)- Integrated nature and water management- Integrated coastal zone management- More space for water- Risk based allocation policy- Risk management as basic strategy- New institutional alliances- Design and implementation of ecological networks- Construct buildings differently- Change modes of transport- Make existing and new cities robust

20/01/2014

12

Results (2)

Lowest priority (weighted summation)- Subsoil drainage of peat lands- Reclamation of (part of) southern North Sea- Abandoning of the whole of low-lying Netherlands- Self sufficiency in production of roughage

Follow-up

National Strategy on Adapting Spatial Planning to Climate Change (ARK), with the aim of ‘climate proofing’ the Netherlands

From the National Adaptation Strategy to the Deltaprogramme, where the Dutch government formulated new priorities in the field of adaptation to climate change

http://www.climateresearchnetherlands.nl/ARKprogramme

http://www.deltacommissie.com/en/advies

20/01/2014

13

Participatory assessment of adaptation options, India

Photo: Karianne de Bruin

Background (1)

Pilot project ‘Extreme risks, vulnerabilities and Community-Based Adaptation (EVA)’ in India

Impacts of extreme weather events on agriculture and water resources in the drought-prone Jalna district, Maharashtra

20/01/2014

14

Background (2)

Five partners in consortium: AFPRO, TERI and CIENS (NIBR, CICERO, NIVA)

Funded by the Norwegian Embassy, New Delhi

Participatory assessment

- Long-list of 26 adaptation options identified, focused on agriculture, water and social development

- Definition of criteria- Block-level officers and at village cluster

level rank criteria and score adaptation options

20/01/2014

15

Field work

Photos: Ulka Kelkar & Karianne de Bruin

Preliminary results (1)

- Construction of water conservation structures- Educating youth

- Integrated farming system- Ground water regulation- Water budgeting

20/01/2014

16

Preliminary results (2)

- Water conservation

- Drip irrigation- Women’s capacity

building - Strengthening of

self-help groups for credit

Photo: Karianne de Bruin

Multi-criteria analysis

Decision support tools

Multi‐criteria analysis

Cost‐effectiveness 

analysis

Cost‐benefit analysis

20/01/2014

17

Summary

- Decision-support tool to assess and rank adaptation options

- Broad applicability- Combine with economic assessment of

costs and benefits

Strengths

- Combine quantitative and qualitative data

- Transparent and simple method

- Involvement of experts and stakeholders

- Subjective scoring and weighting

- Analysis of uncertainty

Weaknesses

20/01/2014

18

References

- De Bruin, K., R.B. Dellink, A. Ruijs, L. Bolwidt, A. van Buuren, J. Graveland, R.S. de Groot, P.J. Kuikman, S. Reinhard, R.P. Roetter, V.C. Tassone, A. Verhagen and E.C. van Ierland (2009). Adapting to climate change in The Netherlands: an inventory of climate adaptation options and ranking of alternatives. Climatic Change 95(1-2): 23-45 (doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9576-4)

- Van Ierland, E.C., de Bruin, K., and Watkiss, P. (2013). Multi-Criteria Analysis: Decision Support Methods for Adaptation, MEDIATION Project, Briefing Note 6. Funded by the EC’s 7FWP – including references for further reading

- Van Ierland, E.C., de Bruin, K. and R.B. Dellink, forthcoming. Prioritisation of adaptation options for the Netherlands: A Multi-Criteria Analysis. Climate Change Adaptation Manual, Lessons learned from European and Other Industrialised Countries. Edited by: A. Prutsch, T. Grothmann, S. McCallum, I. Schauser and R. Swart. Routledge

20/01/2014

19

Thank you for your attention

Contact details: [email protected]

Photo: Karianne de Bruin