RAPDs

8/2/2019 RAPDs

1/31

Using molecular marker technology instudies on plant genetic diversity

DNA-based technologies

PCR-based technologiesPCR with arbitrary primers

(RAPDs, DAF, AP-PCR)

Copyright: IPGRI and Cornell University, 2003 PCR with arbitrary primers 1

8/2/2019 RAPDs

2/31

2


Contents

! PCR with arbitrary primers! RAPD technology, step by step

Isolating DNA PCR reaction

RAPD product detection Diagrammatic summary

! Equipment! Interpreting RAPD banding patterns! Advantages and disadvantages of RAPDs! Applications

Meadow fescue Bell pepper Modern rose

! Differences: DAF and AP-PCR technologies

8/2/2019 RAPDs

3/31

3


MAAP (multiple arbitrary amplicon profiling) istheacronym proposed to cover the three main

technologies that fall in this category:

Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)

DNA amplification fingerprinting (DAF)

Arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction

(AP-PCR)

PCR with arbitrary primers

Three main techniques fall within the category of PCR-based markers using arbitraryprimers: RAPD, DAF and AP-PCR. MAAP is the acronym proposed, but not commonlyused, by Caetano-Anolls et al. (1992) to encompass all of these closely related

techniques. In this submodule, special attention will be given to RAPD, concluding witha comparison of RAPD with DAF and AP-PCR.

Reference

Caetano-Anolls, G., B.J. Bassam and P.M. Gresshoff. 1992. DNA fingerprinting:MAAPing out a RAPD redefinition? Bio/Technology 10 (9):937.

8/2/2019 RAPDs

4/31

4


RAPD technology, step by step

The random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique is a PCR-based method thatuses a short primer (usually 10 bases) to amplify anonymous stretches of DNA. With this

technique, there is no specific target DNA, so each particular primer will adhere to thetemplate DNA randomly. As a result, the nature of the obtained products will be unknown.The DNA fragments generated are then separated and detected by gel electrophoresis.

! Main features Uses a short random primer (usually 10 bases)

Amplifies anonymous stretches of DNA

! Laboratory steps are: Isolating DNA PCR reaction with a primer Separating DNA fragments by gel

electrophoresis Visualising DNA fragments, using ethidium

bromide

8/2/2019 RAPDs

5/31

5


Isolating DNA

Total, chloroplast or mitochondrial DNA can be used

Tiny amounts of DNA are sufficient DNA must be clean and of high molecular

weight

If minimal quality of DNA is not achieved, thereproducibility of results will be hard to ensure

8/2/2019 RAPDs

6/31

8/2/2019 RAPDs

7/31

7


RAPD product detection

Agarose or acrylamide gel electrophoresis andvisualisation with ethidium bromide

RAPDs can be detected by running PCR products through electrophoresis on an agaroseor acrylamide gel. In both cases, the gel is stained with ethidium bromide.

The difference obtained by running RAPD products in acrylamide versus agarose lies onlyin the degree of resolution of bands. In most cases, agarose gel electrophoresis gives

sufficient resolution.

8/2/2019 RAPDs

8/31

8


Diagrammatic summaryA

D

E B

G

CF

Primer

Amplified band

DNA molecule

ECA

DBF

Gel

{

Adapted from Griffiths et al. 1996

8/2/2019 RAPDs

9/31

9


Equipment

! Resources:

Distilled and/or deionised water

Reagents

! Equipment:

Refrigerator and freezer Laminar flow hood Centrifuge Thermocycler Power supply units

Hotplate or microwave pH meter Standard balance Gel electrophoresis units UV transilluminator

8/2/2019 RAPDs

10/31

10


Interpreting RAPD banding patterns (1)

DNA polymorphism among individuals can be due to:

! Mismatches at the primer site

! The appearance of a new primer site

! The length of the amplified region between

primer sites

8/2/2019 RAPDs

11/31

11


Because of the nature of RAPD markers, only thepresence or absence of a particular band can be

assessed. Criteria for selecting scoring bands:

! Reproducibilityneed to repeat experiments

! Thickness

! Size

! Expected segregation observed in a mapping

population

Interpreting RAPD banding patterns (2)

8/2/2019 RAPDs

12/31

12


Interpreting RAPD banding patterns:Example of a bad RAPD gel

This picture shows an image of a bad quality RAPD gel. The bands are fuzzy. Those at the

top have a smear starting from the well where the PCR product was loaded and many areobserved only with difficulty. The hazy background makes observation difficultwhether,

in certain cases, one band is found or two side by side. Certainly, some bands are clearand can be scored, but many other bands are dubious and their interpretation would be

highly risky. Such difficulties raise questions of confidence in data collection.

8/2/2019 RAPDs

13/31

13


Interpreting RAPD banding patterns:Example of a good RAPD gel

This picture shows an image of a very high quality RAPD gel. Both, presence and

absence of most bands are very clear and the background is transparent. Theresearcher would have no doubts while selecting bands and collecting data from this

gel. Consequently, the interpretation of results can be very confident.

8/2/2019 RAPDs

14/31

14


Advantages of RAPDs

! High number of fragments

! Simple

! Arbitrary primers are easily purchased, with noneed for initial genetic or genomic information

! Only tiny quantities of target DNA are required

! Unit costs per assay are low

Some comments:

Many different fragments (corresponding to multiple loci dispersed throughoutthe genome) are normally amplified, using each single primer. The technique

is therefore rapid in detecting polymorphisms. Although most commerciallyproduced primers result in several fragments, some primers may fail to giveamplification fragments from some material.

The technique is simple. RAPD analysis does not require expertise to handle

hybridisation of DNA or other highly technical activities.

8/2/2019 RAPDs

15/31

15


! Dominant

! Lack of a priori knowledge on the identity of theamplification products

! Problems with reproducibility

! Problems of co-migration

Disadvantages of RAPDs

RAPD markers are dominant. Amplification either occurs at a locus or it does not,leading to scores based on band presence or absence. This means that homozygotesand heterozygotes cannot be distinguished. In addition, the absence of a band throughlack of a target sequence cannot be distinguished from that occurring through the lackof amplification for other reasons (e.g. poor quality DNA), contributing to ambiguity in theinterpretation of results.

Nothing is known about the identity of the amplification products unless the studies aresupported by pedigree analysis.

Problems with reproducibility result as RAPD suffers from sensitivity to changes in thequality of DNA, PCR components and PCR conditions, resulting in changes of theamplified fragments. Reproducible results may be obtained if care is taken tostandardise the conditions used (Munthali et al., 1992; Lowe et al., 1996).

Problems of co-migration raise questions like 'Do equal-sized bands correspond to thesame DNA fragment?'

The presence of a band of identical molecular weight in different individuals is notevidence per se that the individuals share the same (homologous) DNA fragment.

A band detected on a gel as being single can comprise different amplification

products. This is because the type of gel electrophoresis used, while able toseparate DNA quantitatively (i.e. according to size), cannot separate equal-sizedfragments qualitatively (i.e. according to base sequence).

References

Lowe, A.J., O. Hanotte and L. Guarino. 1996. Standardization of molecular genetictechniques for the characterization of germplasm collections: the case of randomamplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Plant Genet. Resour. Newsl. 107:50-54.

Munthali, M., B.V. Ford-Lloyd and H.J. Newbury. 1992. The random amplification ofpolymorphic DNA for fingerprinting plants. PCR Methods Appl. 1(4):274-276.

8/2/2019 RAPDs

16/31

16


Applications

! Genetic diversity

! Germplasm characterisation

! Genetic structure of populations

! Domestication

! Detection of somaclonal variation

! Cultivar identification

! Hybrid purity

! Genome mapping

References in purple are explained in detail in the following slides.

Cattan-Toupance, I., Y. Michalakis and C. Neema. 1998. Genetic structure of wild beanpopulations in their South Andean centre of origin. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96:844-851.

Cristofani, M., M.A. Machado and D. Grattapaglia. 1999. Genetic linkage maps of CitrussunkiHort. Ex. Tan. and Poncirus trifoliata(L.) Raf. and mapping of citrus resistancegene. Euphytica 109(1):25-32.

Hashmi, G., R. Huettel, R. Meyer, L. Krusberg and F. Hammerschlag. 1997. RAPDanalysis of somaclonal variants derived from embryo callus cultures of peach. PlantCell Rep 16(9):624-627.

Klliker, R., F.J. Stadelmann, B. Breidy and J. Nsberger. 1998. Fertilization anddefoliation frequency affect genetic diversity of Festuca pratensisHuds. inpermanent grasslands. Mol. Ecol. 7:1557-1567.

Martelli, G., F. Sunseri, I. Greco, M.R. Sabina, P. Porreca and A. Levi. 1999. Strawberrycultivars genetic relationship using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)analysis. Adv. Hortic. Sci. 13(3):99-104.

Martin, M., F. Piola, D. Chessel, M. Jay and P. Heizmann. 2001. The domesticationprocess of the Modern Rose: genetic structure and allelic composition of the rosecomplex. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102:398-404.

Morden, C.W. and W. Loeffler. 1999. Fragmentation and genetic differentiation amongsubpopulations of the endangered Hawaiian mint Haplostachys haplostachya(Lamiaceae). Mol. Ecol. 8:617-625.

Nebauer, S.G., L. del Castillo-Agudo and J. Segura. 1999. RAPD variation within andamong natural populations of outcrossing willow-leaved foxglove (Digitalis obscuraL.).Theor. Appl. Genet. 98:985-994.

Rodrguez, J.M., T. Berke, L. Engle and J. Nienhuis. 1999. Variation among and withinCapsicumspecies revealed by RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99:147-156.

Rom, M., M. Bar, A. Rom, M. Pilowsky and D. Gidoni. 1995. Purity control of F1-hybrid

tomato cultivars by RAPD markers. Plant Breed. 114(2):188-190.

8/2/2019 RAPDs

17/31

17


Example: Meadow fescue

! Title:Fertilization and defoliation frequency affect geneticdiversity of Festuca pratensisHuds. in permanentgrasslands. Mol. Ecol. 1998. 7:1557-1567

! Objective:To assess the genetic variability of meadow fescue, anddetermine whether fertilisation and defoliation frequencyinfluence genetic variability within natural populations

! Materials and methods: Six natural populations and 3 cultivars of Festuca

pratensiswere studied, using 69 RAPD markers (13primers) and 7 agronomic traits.

Samples of natural populations were taken from twounrelated long-term experiments, where treatments

had been applied for 11 to 38 years

(continued on next slide)

8/2/2019 RAPDs

18/31

18


Example: Meadow fescue (continued)

Results:

Factor analysis of agronomic traits failed to separatecultivars from the other populations

Cluster analysis of RAPD data resulted in a cleardistinction between cultivars and natural populations

Genetic variability within cultivars was lower thanwithin natural populations

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed asignificant effect of management on genetic variation


8/2/2019 RAPDs

19/31

19


Example: Meadow fescue (continued)

! Discussion:Significant genetic variation exists within cultivars andnatural populations of Festuca pratensis. However,

fertilisation and high cutting frequency may reduce it

! Conclusions:Unfertilised and rarely cut populations of meadow fescueshould be conserved as a gene pool. Further studies ofother species are needed to learn more about howmanagement systems influence the diversity of plantcommunities and the genetic architecture of species

8/2/2019 RAPDs

20/31

20


Example: Bell pepper

! Title:Variation among and within Capsicumspecies revealedby RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1999. 99:147-156

! Objective:To characterize germplasm of Capsicumspecies

!Materials and methods:A total of 134 accessions from six Capsicumspecies,maintained at the Asian Vegetable Research andDevelopment Center (AVRDC) genebank, werecharacterised with 110 RAPD markers (25 primers)


8/2/2019 RAPDs

21/31

21


Example: Bell pepper (continued)

! Results and discussion:

Ten pairs of potentially duplicate accessionsdocumented

Diagnostic RAPDs were identified and employed toimprove taxonomic identification. They could also beused to monitor natural and artificial hybridisation

Three Capsicumaccessions, misclassified onmorphological traits, were re-identified throughdiagnostic RAPDs

Three accessions, previously unclassified, wereassigned to a species based on diagnostic RAPDs

Capsicum annuumaccessions from the genebank didnot differ from lines in the breeding program for RAPD

variation or diversity


8/2/2019 RAPDs

22/31

22


Example: Bell pepper (continued)

Conclusions:

The AVRDC's pepper breeding program seems to beworking with a diversity that is representative of itspepper collection in the genebank. Molecular markerscan be useful for rationalising the management of an exsitucollection (e.g. identifying duplicates or taxonomic

errors)

8/2/2019 RAPDs

23/31

23


Example: Modern rose

! Title:The domestication process of the Modern Rose: geneticstructure and allelic composition of the rose complex.Theor. Appl. Genet. 2001. 102:398-404

! Objective:To evaluate the genetic variability among cultivated rosevarieties and investigate the history of rose breeding

! Materials and methods:From 13 horticultural groups, 100 old varieties ofcultivated rose were selected for the way they markedsuccessive stages of domestication. They were studiedwith AP-PCR, using five long (20-mer) primers


8/2/2019 RAPDs

24/31

24


Example: Modern rose (continued)

Results and discussion: Fifty-eight polymorphic DNA fragments were

produced, 55 being informative and discriminatory,

allowing differentiation among almost all 100 cultivars

A dendrogram showed the relationships betweenChinese and European founder roses, hybrid groupsof the first and second generations, and the mostmodern hybrid Teas produced during domestication

Principal component analysis demonstrated theoccurrence of a continuous gradient of the European/Chinese allele ratio, and considerable reduction ingenetic variability over the course of domestication


8/2/2019 RAPDs

25/31

25


Example: Modern rose (continued)

Conclusions:

The effect of selection for a limited array ofmorphological traits resulted in the retention of only asmall number of alleles during the domestication of rose.Rose has much more genetic variation than is so farused. Selecting for different variants to generate varietieswith new and valuable aesthetic traits should bepossible

8/2/2019 RAPDs

26/31

26


For DAF:

! Primer concentrations are higher

! Shorter primers are used (5 to 8 nucleotides)

! Two-temperature cycle vs. the 3-temperaturecycle used in RAPD

! Highly complex banding patterns

References

Caetano-Anolls, G., B.J. Bassam and P.M. Gresshoff. 1991a. DNA amplification

fingerprinting: a strategy for genome analysis. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 9(4):294-307.

Caetano-Anolls, G., B.J. Bassam and P.M. Gresshoff. 1991b. DNA amplification usingvery short arbitrary oligonucleotide primers. Bio/Technology 9:553-557.

Differences: DAF and RAPD technologies

8/2/2019 RAPDs

27/31

27


In AP-PCR:

! The amplification is in three parts, each with itsown stringency and concentration of constituents

! High primer concentrations are used in the firstPCR cycles

! Primers of variable length, and often designedfor other purposes, are arbitrarily chosen for use(e.g. M13 universal sequencing primer)

Reference

Welsh, J. and M. McClelland. 1990. Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitraryprimers. Nucleic Acids Res. 18(24):7213-7218.

27

Differences: AP-PCR and RAPD technologies

8/2/2019 RAPDs

28/31

28


In summary

! The RAPD technology is based on a simplePCR with a single short arbitrary primer

! RAPD easily produces a significant numberof bands, but markers are dominant andreproducibility problems are common

! DAF and AP-PCR are alternative, more complextechnologies, of RAPD

8/2/2019 RAPDs

29/31

29


By now you should know

! Main features of the RAPD procedure

! Causes of polymorphisms in the DNA molecule

that can be detected with RAPD

! Criteria for selecting RAPD bands for geneticdiversity analysis

! Advantages and disadvantages of RAPDtechnology

! Main differences of DAF and AP-PCR withRAPD technology

8/2/2019 RAPDs

30/31

Basic references

Caetano-Anolls, G., B.J. Bassam and P.M. Gresshoff. 1991a. DNA amplification

fingerprinting: a strategy for genome analysis. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 9(4):294-307.

Caetano-Anolls, G., B.J. Bassam and P.M. Gresshoff. 1991b. DNA amplification usingvery short arbitrary oligonucleotide primers. Bio/Technology 9:553-557.

Caetano-Anolls, G., B.J. Bassam and P.M. Gresshoff. 1992. DNA fingerprinting:MAAPing out a RAPD redefinition? Bio/Technology 10(9):937.

Griffiths, A.J.F., J.H. Miller, D.T. Suzuki, R.C. Lewontin and W.M. Gelbart. 1996.

An introduction to genetic analysis (6th edn.). W.H. Freeman and Co., NY.

Lowe, A.J., O. Hanotte and L. Guarino. 1996. Standardization of molecular genetic

techniques for the characterization of germplasm collections: the case of randomamplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Plant Genet. Resour. Newsl. 107:50-54.

Munthali, M., B.V. Ford-Lloyd and H.J. Newbury. 1992. The random amplification of

polymorphic DNA for fingerprinting plants. PCR Methods Appl. 1(4):274-276.

Welsh, J. and M. McClelland. 1990. Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitraryprimers. Nucleic Acids Res. 18(24):7213-7218.

Williams, J.G.K., A.R. Kubelik, K.J. Livak, J.A. Rafalski and V. Tingey. 1990. DNApolymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers.

Nucleic Acids Res. 18(22):6531-6535.

30

8/2/2019 RAPDs

31/31


Next

DNA-based technologiesPCR-based technologies

Amplified fragment length polymorphisms

! DNA-based technologies PCR-based technologies

Sequences-tagged sites (STS)

Latest strategies

! Complementary technologies

! Final considerations

! Glossary

Documents

RAPDs