Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
REPORT
5th General Assembly of the Regional Network of Marine Protected Areas in West Africa (RAMPAO)
November 22 – 23, 2014
2
Table of contents Table of contents .................................................................................................................................... 2
ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................ 4
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5
Opening Ceremony ................................................................................................................................ 5
Presentation of the technical and financial reports of activities carried out between December 2011 and October 2013 ................................................................................................................................... 6
Election of the new RAMPAO Chairman ................................................................................................ 7
Signing of memorandums of understanding ......................................................................................... 7
Partners’ presentations .......................................................................................................................... 8
Presentation of EcoFund Chairman, Mr. Markus Faschina ................................................................ 8
Presentation by Mr. Mallé Diagana, WWF ......................................................................................... 8
Presentation of Mr. Ahmed Senhoury, PRCM ................................................................................... 8
Presentation of Mr. Amadou Touré, CSRP ........................................................................................ 8
Presentation of Mr. Richard Dacosta, Wetlands International Africa ................................................ 9
Presentation of Mr. Mathieu Ducrocq, IUCN ..................................................................................... 9
Presentation of Mrs. Charlotte Karibuhoye, FIBA ............................................................................ 10
Presentation of Mr. Julien Semelin, FIBA ......................................................................................... 10
Presentation of Ms. Charlotte Karibuhoye, FIBA ............................................................................. 10
Presentation of Mr. Sékou Kourouma, OGUIPAR ........................................................................... 10
Presentation of Mr. Domingos Gomez Betunde, IBAP .................................................................... 11
Presentation of Colonel Abdoulaye DIOP, DAMCP ......................................................................... 11
Presentation of Mr. Ousainou Touray, DPWM ................................................................................ 11
Presentation of M. Mathieu Ducrocq, IUCN, MPA-‐Fishery Task-‐force ........................................... 11
Presentation of Mr. Paul S. Tendeng, RAMPAO .............................................................................. 12
Presentation of the roadmap for the revision of the regional strategy of West Africa MPAs ......... 12
Full-‐fledged members session .............................................................................................................. 13
Candidacy for full-‐fledged membership ........................................................................................... 13
Applications for associate member status ....................................................................................... 14
By-‐laws ............................................................................................................................................. 14
Session of associate members and technical and financial partners ............................................... 15
Technical presentations of the Secretariat .......................................................................................... 16
Presentation of Mr. Francis Staub, Study on capacity-‐building needs ............................................ 16
Presentation of the 2013-‐ 2016 work plan and the 2014 action plan + budget ................................ 16
Presentation of recommendations of the Scientific Council ........................................................... 17
Presentation and discussion of the communication strategy .......................................................... 17
3
Presentation of recommendations of the 5th GA .............................................................................. 18
Distribution of certificates .................................................................................................................... 20
Closing ceremony ................................................................................................................................. 21
Satisfaction survey ............................................................................................................................... 21
Participant list ....................................................................................................................................... 23
Detailed agenda ............................................................................................................................... 25
4
ACRONYMS GA General Assembly EBSA Ecologically or Biologically Significant Areas MPA Marine Protected Area ICCA Indigenous and Community Conservation Areas BIOCOS Management of West African marine and coastal biodiversity through
conservation and monitoring initiatives in Marine Protected Areas CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CEPIA Working together on fishery management integrating MPAs CNSHB National Center of Fishery Sciences of Boussoura CSRP Sub-‐regional Fishery Commission DAMCP Department of Community Marine Protected Areas DPN Department of National Parks DPWM Department of Parks and Wildlife Management EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone FAO Food and Agriculture Organization FFEM French Fund for Global Environment FIBA International Banc d’Arguin Foundation GEF Global Environment Facility GP SIRENES Participatory Management of Natural Sites and Resources IBA Important Bird Area IBAP Institute for Biodiversity and Protected Areas MAVA MAVA Foundation for Nature OGUIPAR Guinean Office for Parks and Reserves PACT-‐BIODIV Conservation of Biodiversity in MPAs of the RAMPAO Network through the
enhancement of the cultural and traditional heritage RAMPAO West Africa Regional Network of Marine Protected Areas RAPPAM Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Areas Management SENEP Indigenous knowledge, standards and cultural practices WAEMU -‐ West African Economic and Monetary Union IUCN International Union for the Conservation of Nature UMC-‐ PRCM Mobilization and Coordination Unit of the Regional partnership for coastal and
marine conservation in West Africa USAID US Agency for International Development WIA Wetlands International Africa WWF World Wildlife Fund
5
Introduction
The Regional Network of Marine Protected Ares in West Africa (RAMPAO) held its 5th General Assembly from Friday 22nd to Saturday 23rd November 2013 at the Onomo Hotel in Dakar.
Held under the effective chairmanship of the Minister of Land-‐use Planning and Local Councils, and in the presence of the Chief of Staff of the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development, this meeting saw the participation of stakeholders active in the conservation and preservation of marine and coastal resources in the West African ecoregion, mainly hailing from Mauritania, the Gambia, Guinea Bissau, Guinea Conakry and Senegal.
About one hundred delegates attended this major event. These include managers and chairpersons of member MPA management committees, representatives of MPAs seeking to join the network, representatives of RAMPAO partner institutions, representatives of organizations such as FIBA, PRCM, CSRP, WWF, Wetlands International Africa and IUCN, members of the RAMPAO Scientific Council and Executive Committee, and representatives of other regional and international conservation initiatives (see the attendance list in the appendix). Mauritania, Cape Verde and Sierra Leone were not represented.
Pursuant to the Statutes of the Network, the GA unfolded in several phases notably with the presentation of the technical and financial reports, the election of the chairman, the signing of partnership conventions, and plenary sessions held along with group work bringing together member MPAs and technical and financial partners of the network (see the detailed program in the appendix).
The 5th GA was organized thanks to the technical and financial support of FIBA, and the financial support secured from PRCM, WWF, Wetlands International Africa and IBAP.
Opening Ceremony
The opening ceremony of the 5th General Assembly started with the welcome address by the outgoing chairman, Colonel Ousmane Kane, who bade the Senegalese Minister of Land-‐use Planning and Local Councils, El Hadji Oumar Youm and the entire audience welcome. In his address, Colonel Kane recalled the challenges regarding the conservation of marine and coastal biodiversity, notably the various forms of pressure affecting the marine and coastal ecosystems and the management measures undertaken.
Colonel Kane also extolled the work done by the Secretariat that has succeeded in taking up the challenges concerning the organizing of the GA and network communication, and stressed the need for RAMPAO to be financially autonomous to properly run its activities.
6
The outgoing chairman’s speech was followed by that of Graeme Kelleher, member of the Scientific Council, who hailed the cooperation amongst member countries and recalled the non-‐application by many countries of the law on the high seas. According to him, RAMPAO should focus on the establishment of offshore MPAs and work with the United Nations on this issue. He then pledged to support RAMPAO to the best of his abilities in the process of protecting these resources.
Speaking in turn, UMC-‐PRCM Director, Ahmed Senhoury urged member countries of the Nagoya Protocol to ratify the convention to attain the objectives set therein. He called on delegates to coordinate their efforts and work in synergy to better attain conservation objectives. Mr. Senhoury also stressed the funding possibilities with Lifeweb and GEF, the benefit of implementing an information system to enhance the management of protected areas, and the need to centralize databases.
In her remarks, FIBA Director Mrs. Sylvie Goyet focused on the necessary appropriation of the network by the full-‐fledged and associate members through the effective roll-‐out of RAMPAO activities by all. Collaboration and synergy in the management of projects, the establishment of common tools, as well as the promotion of MPAs’ socio-‐economic values are essential, she argued. The FIBA Director then recalled that MPAs are at the heart of national territories and pledged that FIBA would remain attentive to the recommendations stemming from the General Assembly and would further its support to the network.
Following these interventions, Senegal’s Minister of Land-‐use Planning and Local Councils, Mr. El Hadji Oumar Youm officially declared the proceedings open. After congratulating RAMPAO members, the minister reiterated Senegal’s commitment to the conservation of marine and coastal biodiversity. Mr. Youm affirmed that the network actively contributes to the fight against the growing loss of biodiversity resulting from climate change and human actions. He also commended the efforts deployed by Senegal as part of the conservation of marine and coastal biodiversity, as illustrated by the creation of the Department of Community Marine Protected Areas (DAMCP) within the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development. This, he said, is demonstrated by the pioneering role played by Senegal on the international scene in ensuring a sustainable management of the environment and its natural resources in favor of local communities. Reaffirming the Senegalese Government’s willingness to place communities at the heart of the development process, Mr. Youm recalled the ambition of the Head of State to promote stakeholder accountability through the Decentralization Act number 3. The Minister also stressed his department’ interest in the network and the need for the latter to build on the experience acquired by RAMPAO.
Presentation of the technical and financial reports of activities carried out between December 2011 and October 2013
Upon validation of the agenda, the technical and financial reports of the activities carried out or under way were presented by RAMPAO Secretary General, Mrs. Dominique Duval–Diop, who highlighted the recommendations of the 4th General Assembly and the state of progress related to those recommendations.
Discussion
During the discussion, speakers stressed the need for the network’s partners to finalize the 2011 RAPPAM report. The network’s communication strategy must integrate concerns of journalists, members of parliament, local communities and policy makers.
Concerning the development of partnerships, the strengthening of relations with FAO was accented. The Secretariat was urged to submit any conventions to the Scientific Council for a cross-‐check of the legal provisions before they are signed. Delegates also expressed their wish for the furtherance of partnerships with other international conventions such as the Bamako Convention.
7
However, the Secretariat should have a greater leeway to be able to set up strong partnerships with other stakeholders.
As to the relevance of the creation of offshore MPAs, delegates took divergent positions. Some alleged that it would be more fitting for RAMPAO to establish a strategy for the creation of offshore MPAs with the view to attaining the Aichi objectives of 2020 and to keep pace with global trends. For others, the establishment of such MPAs requires many resources and a strong involvement of the national governments. To this end, the Secretariat was called on to keep this initiative in mind for the future.
Responding to the various speakers, the Secretary General assured the assembly that the RAPPAM Report would be finalized by the technical partners and made available to the Network’s stakeholders. Mrs. Duval-‐Diop also reaffirmed the Network’s readiness to further collaboration with international conventions and to submit the related documents to the Scientific Council. Furthermore, she reiterated the network’s commitment to supporting Governments in the description of offshore ecologically and biologically significant areas, without neglecting the need to strengthen the effectiveness of existing MPAs.
Election of the new RAMPAO Chairman
The Republic of Guinea, which holds the chairmanship of the Network, proposed M. Aboubacar Oulare as its candidate. This candidacy was later accepted by the assembly. M. Oulare, Director General of the Guinean Office of Parks and Reserves (OGUIPAR) was then elected Chairman of RAMPAO for the next two (2) years
Signing of memorandums of understanding
As part of its collaborative approach towards its usual partners, and the development of collaborations with new ones active in the conservation and management of marine and coastal resources, the RAMPAO signed several memorandums of understanding with:
8
• The Department of Community Marine Protected Areas (DAMCP). To attain the objectives assigned to them in their respective mandates, DAMCP and RAMPAO will develop and assess plans for the management of the sites, and launch communication and environment awareness actions;
• Ecofund. Between Ecofund, a German association, and RAMPAO, it has been agreed to promote concrete actions having a positive and tangible impact on the protection of biodiversity in West Africa. Its main objective is to protect MPAs through common projects and communication campaigns targeting the younger generation;
• The convention with the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) was signed on November 29th 2013 by Regional Director Mr. Aime Nianogo who attended the PRCM Regional forum. IUCN and RAMPAO have defined a framework of cooperation in a bid to work together for the conservation and the sustainable use of marine and coastal resources in MPAs and neighboring ecosystems. The convention will facilitate the coordination of efforts, and create mutual assistance and synergy in the actions to be carried out on the ground in various fields of common interest.
Partners’ presentations
Presentation of EcoFund Chairman, Mr. Markus Faschina
Markus Faschina presented Ecofund as an organization facilitating the acquisition of funding from partnerships for conservation efforts. According to him, the project is based on a citizen-‐driven dialogue for the protection of biodiversity. The Ecofund approach is three-‐pronged: communication, dialogue and participatory funding.
Presentation by Mr. Mallé Diagana, WWF
"Governance, marine and coastal resources management policies, and poverty reduction in the West African Marin Ecoregion," such is the title of Mr. Diagana’s presentation. The said project , which covers Mauritania, Senegal Guinea Bissau, Guinea Conakry, the Gambia and Sierra Leone (to come on board in 2014), seeks to contribute to poverty alleviation and the strengthening of food security of the coastal communities of the WAMER ecoregion. According to Mr. Diagana, prospects in the pipeline include supporting the development and implementation of MPA management plans and the provision of equipment for MPAs, notably for surveillance and capacity-‐building.
Presentation of Mr. Ahmed Senhoury, PRCM
In his presentation, Mr. Senhoury recalled the genesis of the PRCM, which went from a program to a partnership. He assured the audience of the PRCM’s readiness to assist the Network in reaching its various objectives and its willingness to share opportunities of collaboration and services. Mr. Senhoury also revealed that in the beginning, the PRCM was the initiative of four major organizations (Wetlands International Africa, IUCN, WWF and FIBA), before evolving to become a partnership resulting created through the initiative of all these actors .
Presentation of Mr. Amadou Touré, CSRP
In his presentation, M. Toure addressed all the bio-‐ecological aspects of MPAs, which are tools of fishery management that play an important role in the management of marine and coastal resources. The global review of best practices in the use of MPAs as fishery management tools showed that they contribute to the rise in recruitment and the reduction of mortality in fishery resources. The cost of the operation of a MPA and the opportunity cost, as well as the equitable distribution of profits are some socio-‐economic matters to be taken into consideration. He stressed that the study has underscored the importance in giving priority to a shared governance of -‐Fishery MPAs to realize the maximum of profits.
9
Discussions
Ideas and questions were raised following the presentations. The presentation by Mr. Diagana aroused many questions on the best way to help MPAs secure financial resources available under the project. In his answers to the questions, Mr. Diagana announced that the starting phase came to an end and that the second phase would, in its action plans, address MPAs’ concerns through the networking of community radio stations. However, Mr. Diagana stressed that the budget was not entirely destined only to MPAs.
Other questions touched on the need to create new MPAs or support the effectiveness of existing MPAs, and the relevance in assessing their efficiency and identifying their economic values. Additionally, delegates discussed the categorization of MPAs in Fishery-‐MPAs and Conservationist-‐MPAs.
On the definition of these concepts or categories, delegates expressed divergent ideas. For some, the designation as a Fishery-‐MPA or Conservationist-‐MPA refers to a zoning that depends on the governance system present in each MPA. Others argued that these designations are accounted for within the IUCN categories , which focus on the three mainstays of conservation that are: preservation, sustainable use and restoration.
Lunch Break
Presentation of Mr. Richard Dacosta, Wetlands International Africa
Mr. Dacosta’s presentation was centered on the theme “Mangroves and MPAs in West Africa: a continuum including the development of synergies.” The outline of the presentation by Mr. Dacosta was structured around three points: the network of MPAs in mangrove ecosystem of the PRCM region, the strategic directions of Wetlands International Africa, and synergies of intervention.
In his presentation, Mr. Dacosta affirmed that 23 out of the 26 RAMPAO member MPAs protect their mangrove ecosystems, and confirmed the efficient role of MPAs in the management of mangroves. Yet, he noted that between 1980 and 2006, some 16 percent of the mangrove acreage within the PRCM space was lost. Thus, he attracted the audience’s attention on the need to strengthen the mangrove habitats that are major ecosystems and very important in the configuration of MPAs. Dacosta also accented the need to step up mangrove ecosystem rehabilitation and restoration programs in some MPAs, before alluding to the signing of the Mangrove Charter for six countries in PRCM region.
Presentation of Mr. Mathieu Ducrocq, IUCN
In his presentation, Mr. Ducrocq addressed several domains in which IUCN supported MPAs in the Network. These domains include the promotion of shared governance (GP – SIRENES) and the establishment of links between MPAs and the fishing sector through the implementation of the CEPIA Project. IUCN has, since the 4th General Assembly, capitalized on the results stemming from
10
the project on the sustainable financing of MPAs, and carried out many activities in connection with the conservation of marine biodiversity (mangroves, marine turtles, etc.).
Presentation of Mrs. Charlotte Karibuhoye, FIBA
Making a presentation on the BIOCOS Project “Management of West African marine and coastal biodiversity through conservation and monitoring initiatives in Marine Protected Areas”, Mrs. Karibuhoye stressed the main objective of the BIOCOS Project, which is to enhance MPAs’ role in the protection of biodiversity and in socio-‐economic development. The project revolves around three main components:
-‐ Improving the efficiency of MPA management (Pilot sites: Bamboung and Urok; Partners: Oceanium and Tiniguena) ;
-‐ Monitoring of ecological and socioeconomic effects (Pilot sites: Urok, Bamboung, Niumi, Tristao ; Partners: IBAP, DPWM, CNSHB, OGUIPAR, IUPA, Wetlands International);
-‐ Promoting MPAs, communication and capitalization (Pilot sites: Bamboung, Urok ; Partners: Oceanium and Tiniguena).
Presentation of Mr. Julien Semelin, FIBA
The Alcyon Project presented by Mr. Semelin is aimed at “Contributing to the protection of seabirds in West Africa through the identification of important bird areas (IBA).” In his presentation, Semelin highlighted the strategies and results of the project, notably the identification of important seabird sites and the strengthening of protection measures. In this connection, he stressed the importance of birds as a bio-‐ecological indicator, adding that there are strong interactions between birds and fishermen. In addition, he affirmed that this project contributes to the protection of birds in marine areas, hence the need to develop important areas for these species.
Presentation of Ms. Charlotte Karibuhoye, FIBA
The PACT-‐BIODIV Project (Conservation of Biodiversity in MPAs of the RAMPAO Network through the enhancement of the cultural and traditional heritage) presented by Ms. Charlotte Karibuhoye seeks to promote the traditional knowledge and know-‐how in MPAs of the network. In her presentation, the FIBA representative described the project as one organized around three intervention points: a) promotion of the indigenous knowledge, cultural standards and practices of sustainable management of natural resources; b) support for the integration of SENEPs (indigenous knowledge, standards and cultural practices) in MPA management; c) strengthening the integration of SENEPs in legal tools related to protected areas in the countries concerned. This three-‐year project will be implemented in three countries: Senegal, Guinea Conakry and Guinea Bissau.
Presentation of Mr. Sékou Kourouma1, OGUIPAR
In his presentation on the protected areas in Guinea, Mr. Kourouma pointed out the importance of the Guinean heritage in terms of biodiversity, which is recognized as a hotspot for international conservation efforts in West Africa. According to the WWF, this heritage is one of the world’s top 200 eco regions in terms of habitats, endemism and the richness of species.
Concerning the national strategy for the management of protected areas, Guinea has established a national network of protected areas and a ten-‐year program (2011 – 2020) for the sustainable management of this network. The network encompasses 53 protected sites distributed in the land, costal, marine, insular, and fresh water ecosystems. It stretches over 8 percent of the national territory (strategic phase 1992 – 2010 of CBD) and seeks to reach 25 percent of the national territory in MPAs for the second phase (2011 – 2020 of the CBD).
1Curator of the Marine Protected Area of Loos Islands
11
Presentation of Mr. Domingos Gomez Betunde, IBAP
M. Domingos unveiled the biological and ecological richness of his country’s different protected areas, and showed the future distribution of the national protected area system of Guinea Bissau. The current national system of protected areas is composed of six areas covering an acreage of 5,370 square km, representing about 14.87% of the national territory. The maritime insular complex of the Bijagos stretching over 2,622 square km, represents 7.3% of the national territory. It groups several MPAs including the Orango National Park, the National Maritime Park of Joao Vieira Polao and the Urok Park. The coastal protected areas cover 2,748 square km, representing about 7.6% of the national territory and include the Cacheu National mangrove park , the National lagoon park of Cufada and the Cantanhez National park ). The country envisages extending this national network of protected areas to 23.7% of the national territory.
Presentation of Colonel Abdoulaye DIOP, DAMCP
The Director of the Department of Community Marine Protected Areas (DAMCP) recalled the global concerns in terms of conservation, the political will in Senegal and the aspirations of local governments for the creation of marine protected areas by decree. He described the network and the protected areas’ goals in terms of the protection of representative ecosystems, preservation of endangered species, promotion of research and education, tourist promotion, and self-‐promotion of local communities. Mr. Diop also spoke of the vision and the choice of the sites in terms of representativeness, coherence, and connectivity based on the land-‐sea interface, before unveiling the different sites managed by his Department and the initiatives to create other MPAs in Senegal.
Presentation of Mr. Ousainou Touray, DPWM
Mr. Touray of the Gambian Department of Parks and Wildlife Management started his intervention by describing the history of the department and the mission assigned to it, before highlighting the major goal of attaining 10% of protection of the coastal area. Mr. Touray then listed 4 marine protected areas in the Gambia that are members of the network: Tanji Bird Reserve; Bao Bolon; Tanbi Wetland Complex and the Niumi National Park. The identification of EBSAs, the finalizing of the Tanji business plan, the development of a management framework and a Lifeweb project, the revision of the law on fauna conservation, and investments of partners such as FIBA, WWF and USAID, such as the key initiatives rolled out by the Department.
Presentation of M. Mathieu Ducrocq, IUCN, MPA-‐Fishery Task-‐force
M. Mathieu Ducrocq underscored the problems related to the management and governance of MPAs in connection to fisheries. These problems include the lack of real diagnostic studies targeting the various types of fishing, the low level integration of MPAs in the fishery context and the small number of MPAs locally managed for fishery purposes.
M. Ducrocq also recalled the establishment of the MPA-‐Fishery Task Force by the CSRP and RAMPAO with the support of partners. A regional initiative has been developed to support the Task Force’s work plan, to ensure the technical support of IUCN (MACO, Coast Expert Group, Fisheries Expert Group), of IRD and other partners. Even if the start-‐up funds have been identified by IUCN in the 3rd framework agreement between France and IUCN (2014), some supplementary funds have yet to be mobilized. When wrapping up his presentation, Ducrocq laid emphasis on the expected results and expressed his wish to see this project contribute to the operationalization and perpetuation of the Task Force.
12
Presentation of Mr. Paul S. Tendeng, RAMPAO
The GA was the occasion for the first restitution to RAMPAO members of the findings of the ecological and biological gap analysis completed in June 2012. In this regard, Mr. Tendeng seized the occasion to thank members and partners for their contributions. The results highlight the coastal character of the network that protects about 12.69% of territorial waters and only 0.14% of EEZs. On the one hand, a sound representativeness of coastal habitats such as the mangrove ecosystems (10%), the marine herbal communities (74%), estuaries (13%), coral reefs (5%) was noted. On the other hand, we have noted a low protection of open sea habitats such as the canyons (3% of the Kayar canyon), seamounts (only one seamount is protected in the MPA of Santa Luzia, Cape Verde), cold water reefs and permanent upwelling areas.
As to connectivity, it appeared that out of the 26 MPAs in the network, 64% are separated by a minimal distance below 50 km. This is observed from Kayar (Senegal) to Tristao (Guinea Bissau) and from the Loos Islands in Guinea to the potential MPAs in Sierra Leone. Finally, several ecologically and biologically significant sites have been identified in member countries.
Presentation of the roadmap for the revision of the regional strategy of West Africa MPAs
Ms. Dominique Duval-‐Diop, RAMPAO Secretary General, presented the roadmap for the revision of the regional strategy of the marine protected areas. She first stressed the evolution of the political context and the geographic context such as demographic growth and urbanization, industrial development on the littoral, and the abusive exploitation of fishery resources. Ms. Duval-‐Diop then insisted on the purpose of revising the 2002 strategy and the need to assess the latter, the relevance in considering the new conservation approaches and issues, and the fact that this revision was recommended by the 4th General Assembly. In the roadmap, the Secretary General explained the objectives, the five stages necessary for the revision and the coordination to be performed by RAMPAO with the support of a Consultant and the UMC of the PRCM. She indicated that the activities to be carried out as part of this initiative will, as much as possible, build upon the national strategies developed by countries like Guinea Bissau, Mauritania, Senegal, the Gambia and Guinea, and on the efforts undertaken by regional partners.
Discussions
Participants deplored the negligence of the usefulness of MPAs as a tool for adaptation to climate change in the presentations, the integration of projects into regional strategies and the existing relationship between these projects and the priorities of local governments. Delegates also discussed the need to mobilize the Task Forces and make them operational, and the tendency for partners and project managers to choose the same sites.
Concerning the funding and collaboration possibilities, it was noted that the various projects could secure FFEM funding and that the Network should show interest in WAEMU activities.
In response to the various questions raised by the audience, Ms. Karibuhoye indicated that the choice of pilot sites for PACT-‐BIODIV projects was based on data stemming from the study on sacred sites. The selected sites are spaces that encompass sacred areas or that host sacred activities. In addition, she pointed out that the project would collect best practices in conservation with a view to establishing a stronger link with national strategies. For his part, Mr. Semelin indicated that birds are good indicators of the health of ecosystems and that there is a strong relationship between fishermen and birds.
13
Day II of the General Assembly started with the continuation of the discussions on the last presentations of the previous day.
The issue concerning the creation of new MPAs such as the Sanghomar MPA was discussed. On this issue, delegates had divergent positions, with some expressing concern about the creation of new MPAs without consulting local populations, while others affirmed that the Sanghomar MPA was created at the request of and in collaboration with local populations.
As to the roadmap for the revision of the regional strategy of MPAs in West Africa, it was suggested that the Secretariat should cast more light on some issues, and review the proposed time frame that was deemed rather long. The Secretariat needs to hire a consultant to identify the cases of success and the obstacles, and to compile all information from the countries. This process must follow a bottom up approach. The unavailability of the 2011 RAPPAM reportwas also cited as a major obstacle to the revision of the regional strategy.
Full-‐fledged members session
Candidacy for full-‐fledged membership
This session dealt with the candidacies of full-‐fledged and associate members, and proposed revisions to the by-‐laws. The discussions on member applications were presided over by RAMPAO Chairman Mr. Aboubacar Oulare, and the one on the by-‐laws by Mr. Bocar Kanté, member of the Scientific Committee.
Attendees represented 232 of the 26 member MPAs and convened to assess the various applications and discussed the by-‐laws.
Presentation of membership applications
The only application for full-‐fledged membership received by the Secretariat was that of the Community Nature Reserve of Somone in Senegal. This application was submitted to the full-‐fledged members along with a synthesis of the evolution of the membership file based on membership criteria.
Table 1: Synthesis of the analysis of RAMPAO membership applications
MPA
Biologically and ecologically significance
Existence of an official recognition, with geographic boundaries and management objectives
Existence of an operational management body
Existence of a management and/or development plan, or a multi-‐annual activity plan
Remarks Recommendations of the Secretariat
Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
Community Nature Reserve of Somone
x x x x Management Plan
Criteria met
When comparing the document drafted by the MPA with the eligibility criteria, full-‐fledged members noted the following:
• In the membership application:
2 Missing MPAs: Cap Blanc Reserve, Banc d’Arguin National Park, Diawling National Park, Madeleine Islands National Park
14
o The duration of the management plan was not mentioned o The existence of a local management body3 (community) was not mentioned
• The site’s ecological representativeness was discussed and evidence was given to confirm the biological and ecological value thereof.
After analysis, the application of the Community Nature Reserve of Somone (Senegal) was accepted as a full-‐fledged member of RAMPAO with the unanimous vote of present full-‐fledged members.
Recommendations from the discussions:
• A visit of the site by a delegation of full-‐fledged members should be conducted; • Management plan should be sent to full-‐fledged members prior to the vote on membership; • Potential sites should do a presentation before the members’ vote.
Applications for associate member status
Applications for associate member status were submitted to the assessment of full-‐fledged members. Two types of applications were received from individuals and organizations. Among the 14 applications, two were rejected due to incomplete application files. It was recommended to the Secretariat to request for the provision of missing elements and to discuss these applications at the next GA.
Youssouf Bodian: one vote against Moustapha Ciss : 16votes favorable
Mignane Sarr : all votes favorable Frédérick Airaud : application file incomplete
Mathieu Ducroq : all votes favorable Pierre Campredon : all votes favorable
Mamadou DIA : all votes favorable Ana Benga Cham : all votes favorable
Omar Sadio : all votes favorable Ahmet Ba : all votes favorable
Naforé : all votes favorable Global communication : all votes favorable
Océanium : all votes favorable Adepa : all votes favorable
FREM : application file incomplete
By-‐laws
Concerning the RAMPAO headquarters, the full-‐fledged members decided to remove the term "permanent”. Actually, full-‐fledged members decided during this GA that the headquarters could be relocated in any country of the eco region.
As to the network values, a recommendation was made to add "support for the global network of marine protected areas.”
Regarding the definition of the network’s member MPAs, delegates decidedto replace the term "marine environment” by “marine and coastal ecosystem.” This formulation integrates the terrestrial part of MPAs and the interaction between land and marine environments.
Regarding the designation of the MPA representative (Article 4) (Chairman of the Management Committee or Park manager) within the network, no consensus was reached. Some affirmed that the chairpersons of management committees should be the representatives in the network, arguing that park managers are only officers providing a technical support. Others cited the example of
3 Only the curator was mentioned
15
some MPAs under State-‐control and others that do not have any management committee. It was eventually agreed that a study should be conducted to make a final decision in this regard.
As to the mandate of the Chairman in case of delay in the holding of the General Assembly, members proposed that the mandate should be extended until the holding of the upcoming GA.
One member asked the question as to who replaces the chairman in case of forced absence, notably the demise of the chairman. His/her replaced by a full-‐fledge member of the Executive Committee was accepted as a solution.
Furthermore, delegates agreed that MPA membership applications, candidacies for chairmanship and the draft conventions should be submitted to the Scientific Council. Necessarily, the Council is expected to provide a mandatory opinion on applications and draft conventions before any decision is made. But, the stance of the Scientific Council engages neither the Chairman nor the Executive Committee. It only enables decision makers to be enlightened before making a decision (Art.7).
Some members stressed that there is no criteria for the selection of associate members.
Session of associate members and technical and financial partners
The session devoted to associate members and technical and financial partners was held on the sidelines of the meeting of full-‐fledged members. The aim of the meeting was to discuss the concrete contributions of partner to the objectives of the multi-‐year work plan. Attendees included: Mr. Souleye Ndiaye (DPN Chairman), Mr. Thialy Faye (Civil Forum), Mr. Thierry Renaud (MAVA), Mr. Francis Staub (RAMPAO Consultant), Mr. Gabin Agblonon (WIA), Mr. Ousainou Touray, Mr. Mohamed Lamin Kassama (DPWM), Mr. Emmanuel Ramos and Ms. Charlotte Karibuhoye (FIBA).
Given the absence of many partners of the network, the issue related to the concrete contribution to the implementation of the network’s work plan was not addressed. As a result, recommendations and discussions touched on the need to share information on the interventions made in and for the benefit of MPAs, the capitalization of tools and the improvement of communication. Recommendations stemming from the debates include the following:
1. Partners’ contribution to the implementation of the work plan
Formalizing a periodic meeting of partners of the network in a bid to harmonize interventions and enhance consistency and transparency in the support provided. Regarding this issue, partners must communicate with the Secretariat on the planned interventions to for more synergy.
2. Use of the tools
Harmonizing the use of the tools by members of the network (e.g. shared governance, management plan, business plan, etc.). Partners must, when developing tools, provide for resources for the diffusion and the training in the use of the said tools, in order to facilitate their effective exploitation. It would be fitting to multiply and promote examples such as that of the Gambia which, based on the guides for the development of management and business plans, has secured support for the development of plans for MPAs.
3. Communication
A recommendation was made to ensure that the network members communicate on RAMPAO during their participation in national, regional and international meetings (in collaboration with the Secretariat).
16
Technical presentations of the Secretariat
Presentation of Mr. Francis Staub, Study on capacity-‐building needs
Developing capacities of both the staff of management bodies and local stakeholders (fishermen, coastal populations) and growing awareness on nature protection are essential for an efficient management. To tackle this priority, the RAMPAO Secretariat has commissioned a study to assess the capacity-‐building needs and the current priorities in member MPAs, to analyze existing capacity building programs and activities in the region and to develop a capacity development strategy that meets the management needs. The findings of this study were presented for the validation and discussion of the recommendations therein. A summary report will be sent to the network with the view to the finalizing of the capacity building strategy for managers of network MPAs.
Presentation of the 2013-‐ 2016 work plan and the 2014 action plan + budget
The Secretary General presented the 2013 – 2016 work plan, the 2014 action plan and the budget . The logical framework of the 2013 – 2016 work plan is centered on four objectives, their expected results and the activities planned to achieve these results. An emphasis was made on the capitalizing on of the successes and progress made between 2008 and 2012, notably the enhancement of MPAs’ efficiency and the strengthening of the institutional and financial capacities of the network. The increased visibility of the network and its impact on advocacy frameworks were also given due attention.
Following are the specific objectives and the results expected from the 2013 – 2016 work plan:
Specific Objective 1 (SO 1) – Ensuring an efficient and sustainable management and governance of MPAs of the Network
• Result 1 (R1) – Capacities and skills of MPA managers and local stakeholders active in the key domains4 related to MPA management are strengthened
• Result 2 (R2) -‐ The Network’s efficiency in MPA management is improved Specific Objective 2 (SO 2) – Improving the institutional and financial sustainability of the Network
• Result 3 (R3) -‐ Human, technical and material resources are mobilized for the benefit of the Secretariat and other RAMPAO organs ;
• Result 4 (R4) – Operational, participatory and efficient governance of the Network are put in place
• Result 5 (R5) -‐ The Network is endowed with sustainable and diverse sources of funding • Result 6 (R6) – MPAs of the Network are better equipped and assisted by RAMPAO in their
search for funding. Specific Objective 3 (SO31) – Improving the visibility of the Network and its members at local, national and international level and facilitating communication and exchanges among members
• Result 7 (R7) – Local, national and regional decision makers are better informed and aware of the threats on marine and coastal biodiversity in West Africa and on the value of RAMPAO and MPAs
• Result 8 (R8) – Communication and exchanges of experiences and practices among members are improved;
• Result (R9) -‐ RAMPAO is better known and renowned on the national, regional and international scene ;
• Result (R10) – Advocacy and representation capacities of the Secretariat and member MPAs at national, regional and international level are strengthened.
4 These key domains of MPA management are defined in the capacity-‐building strategy intended for RAMPAO members 2014-‐2016
17
Specific Objective 4 (SO41) – Contributing to decision making for the strengthening of the Network’s ecological function through the integration of new MPAs, and the improved management of member MPAs integrated in a territorial approach based on in-‐depth and reliable knowledge of the West African marine and coastal ecosystems
• Result 11 (R11) – Identification of coastal areas of regional interest (ecosystems, critical habitats, corridors to be conserved) is developed and refined ;
• Result 12 (R12) -‐ Dialogue and collaboration between the environment sector and the other sectors, notably fishery, is effective and operational to the benefit of MPAs ;
• Result 13 (R13) – The impact of climate change on ecosystems and MPA communities, and the contribution of MPAs and the Network in the development of mitigation and adaptation strategies are better addressed and adaptation measures undertaken.
Presentation of recommendations of the Scientific Council
Mrs. Grazia Borrini-‐Feyerabend, member of the Scientific Council made a general and comprehensive presentation highlighting the main recommendations of Scientific Council members. This presentation was followed by the individual comments of each member.
The issues unveiled include the need to shorten the process for the revision of regional MPA strategy and the need to maintain the network’s commitment to offshore EBSAs at international level,. She also stressed the need to strengthen ties with various sectors such as food security, health, poverty, transportation, trade and tourism. In a bid to ensure greater inclusion, all activities of the network should involve key community stakeholders, experts and scientists.
In its capacity building strategy, the RAMPAO Network must develop capacities in the long term within the region to foster good governance, efficient management and active learning (monitoring and evaluation of the scientific quality and the value for directly interested stakeholders).
Presentation and discussion of the communication strategy
Ms. Doumbouya presented the network’s communication approach and context. She who described some of the communication activities carried out by the Network and emphasized the challenges and the public to be targeted. The proposed approach is to develop a regional communication strategy. The strategy to be developed, based all the recommendations and strategic mainstays defined in the network’s work plan, will be formulated in a participatory manner, with the support of technical experts, she added. It will also integrate MPAs’ needs as well as their unique socio-‐cultural realities.
Discussions
During the discussion of the proposed communication approach, some delegates extolled the federating role played by the Network and the work done so far. Others expressed concern as to the recruitment of a consultant expected to assist the Secretariat in the development of a communications strategy. They recommended that the Secretariat should seek the services of an expert well versed in MPAs and who has a good understanding of the realities of local populations, adding that the entire staff of the Secretariat should work in the field and collaborate directly with the grassroots populations.
The network was urged to open up to the media, notably community radio stations, in order to enable MPAs to exchange information with the populations and to better raise public awareness, to collaborate with the parliamentarian network , to increase the use of social networks and to integrate civil society associations.
18
In her answers to the various interventions, Mrs. Doumbouya confirmed once again the Secretariat’s willingness to work in synergy with all stakeholders, while taking into account the realities of the various audiences. She also urged the members to be more open to collaboration.
Presentation of recommendations of the 5th GA In the discussions of the General Assembly, several recommendations were made and validated. These are listed in the table below.
Feld concerned
Resolution adopted
INSTITUTIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS 1. By-‐laws It has been recommended to validate the by-‐laws by integrating the
following amendments: – Transforming the Advisory Council into an Executive Committee; – Extending the mandate of the Chairman until the organization of the
next GA; – Replacement of the Chairman, in case of death, by a full-‐fledged
member who is also a member of the Executive Committee; – Obligation to seek mandatory advice of the Scientific Council in the
case of the submission of a membership application, candidacy for chairmanship and draft partnerships agreements.
2. Amendment of Statutes
On the designation of the representative of the member MPA (art.4) – Chairman of the Management Committee or Park manager – within the network, no consensus was reached. Delegates agreed to conduct of a study to facilitate a final decision before amending the Statutes accordingly. The status of RAMPAO associate members who belong to national institutions in charge of MPAs must also be addressed during the revision.
3a. Partnerships Pursue the development of partnerships with international conventions such as the Bamako Convention, the APAC Consortium, Wetlands International Africa and FAO, among others.
3b. Partnerships The organization of a periodic meeting that brings together network partners in order to harmonize interventions and enhance consistency and transparency in the technical support actions. In this respect, it is essential to ensure that partners communicate with the Secretariat on the planned interventions, for more synergy.
4. Communication Ensure that all members of the network communicate on the RAMPAO during their participation in national, regional and international meetings (in collaboration with the Secretariat).
5. RAPPAM Dissemination of the results of all RAPPAM evaluations within the network before the organization of the GA, for a better sharing of information on the deliberations of the assemblies. The Network must be in possession of the results of RAPPAM 2011 and 2013.
RECOMMENDATIONS ON CAPACITY BUILDING 6. Mobilization of
Task forces The regional capacity building strategy of RAMPAO was validated. In the implementation, of this strategy the GA recommended that RAMPAO should prioritize the effective mobilization of regional groups of experts (Task Forces).
7. Development of tools
Partners must harmonize the use of the tools developed for RAMPAO members (e.g. shared governance, management and business plans, etc.). When producing these tools, it is important to provide for resources for the diffusion and training in the use thereof in order to ensure their effective use. Multiplying and promoting examples such as that of the Gambia which, based on guidelines for the development of management and business plans, has secured support for the development of management plans for its MPAs.
19
RECOMMENDATIONS ON OTHER ISSUES 8. MPA – Fishery
Task force The Secretariat was congratulated for taking the initiative to develop a collaboration with the Sub-‐regional Fishery Commission (CSRP) in order to create a MPA – Fishery Task Force and to develop a joint work plan. The GA welcomed the project concept note prepared by the Secretariat in collaboration with CSRP, IUCN and IRD, the assembly strongly encouraged the Secretariat to maintain its collaboration with any competent partner in drafting a comprehensive project document and in mobilizing the funds necessary for the launch of this initiative starting in 2014.
9. Climate change The RAMPAO should take into account the effects of climate change and the need to invest in adaptation measures to increase the resilience of MPA communities. RAMPAO must establish a working group that will reflect on the best regional approach to strengthening the capacities of its members in the fight against climate change effects.
10. Prospective approach
The Network’s work plan should adopt a prospective approach in its annual plans in order to anticipate responses to environmental, demographic and other changes.
11. National strategies of MPAs
National MPA strategiesand biodiversity conservation strategies must take into account the activities of projects implemented under regional partnerships in the network’s sites.
12. Capacity building The regional capacity building strategy of RAMPAO was validated. 13. Carbon credit The network should explore possibilities of securing sustainable funding
through the carbon emissions exchange market. RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL
14. Roadmap for the revision of the regional strategy of MPAs in West Africa
The roadmap proposed for the revision of the regional strategy of MPAs in West Africa must be shortened and must seek the services of a Consultant.
15. High seas RAMPAO must maintain its commitment, at the international level, to ecologically and biologically significant areas in the high seas and must work in close collaboration with Governments and international partners, notably the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, to support international processes to protect these areas. These processes must envisage the creation of efficient and equitable governance bodies, and must be based on scientific knowledge.
16. Regional strategy of MPAs in West Africa
The regional strategy of MPAs in West Africa should envisage the creation, the efficient management and the equitable governance of marine protected areas in the network. RAMPAO must strengthen its ties with stakeholders in the fishing sector (in continuity with the recent initiatives), economic development, food security, health, poverty, transportation, trade and tourism. The strategy must take into account the mitigation of climate change effects.
17. Participation of stakeholders
The process for the revision of the regional strategy of MPAs in West Africa should involve key community stakeholders, experts and scientists. This will make it possible to involve local communities (traditional and institutional representatives), government agencies, user groups (e.g. fishermen), tourism managers, in a bid to build on their knowledge, concerns and capacities.
18. Capacity building In its strategy on capacity building, RAMPAO must improve the capacities in the long term within the region, for good governance, the efficient management and active learning (monitoring and evaluation of the scientific quality and the value for the stakeholders directly interested).
20
Distribution of certificates
By way of thanks and in recognition of the services that members and partners provide to the network, certificates were handed out to MPAs, and “Certificates of Honor” given to Senegalese authorities, the Minister of Environment of Guinea, and members of the Scientific Council whose mandate has expired, as well as to the outgoing Chairman.
21
Closing ceremony
The 5th GA of the RAMPAO Network wrapped up under the effective chairmanship of Mr. Souleye Ndiaye, Director of National Parks of Senegal representing the Minister of Environment and Sustainable Development, and was presided over by the elected Chairman, Mr. Aboubacar Oulare.
Satisfaction survey
A satisfaction survey was conducted with attendees to assess to what extent the assembly met their expectations in terms of content, the provision of information and the facilitation of the discussions, recommendations and logistics. Twenty-‐seven people answered the questionnaire by selecting one of the following responses: TS – Very satisfactory; S -‐ Satisfactory; SA -‐ Neutral; IS – Not satisfactory; TIS – Very unsatisfactory.
A score was given to each answer, ranging from 5 for satisfactory to 1 for very unsatisfactory. The results are indicative of a high level of satisfaction in all categories except for logistics, as delegated lamented the frequent power cuts that occurred during the first day.
CATEGORIE / CATEGORY NOTE / SCORE
L’atelier a-‐t-‐il répondu à vos attentes/objectifs? Did the workshop fulfill your expectations?
4.2
Les présentations étaient-‐elles claires et concises ? Were the presentations clear and concise?
4.1
Les discussions ont-‐elles été bien organisées ? Were the discussions well organized and facilitated?
4.3
La discussion a-‐t-‐elle soulevé des enjeux/questions auxquels vous vous attendiez? Did the discussions raise important questions and issues?
4.4
L’atelier vous a-‐t-‐il fournit des informations auxquels vous sous attendiez? Did the event provide information as expected?
4.3
Etes-‐vous satisfait des résultats et recommandations de l’atelier? Are you satisfied with the results and recommendations?
4.3
Le lieu, logement, la nourriture et l’organisation de l’atelier étaient-‐ils satisfaisants? Were the location, food, and logistics of the event satisfactory?
3.7
22
23
Participant list
FIRST NAME/LASTNAME
POSITION EMAIL
REPRESENTATIVES OF MEMBER MPAs Abdou Karim Sall Chairman of the Joal Fadiouth
MPA Management Committee Abdou-‐karim-‐[email protected]
Alioune. B. Gueye Bamboung MPA Curator [email protected] Assane Ndoye Curator of the National Park of
the Saloum Delta [email protected]
Bafode Cisse RNCP Curator [email protected] Bah Abdou Salam Curator, Tristao bahabdousalam@[email protected] Bara Sène Chairman of St-‐Louis MPA
Management Committee [email protected]
Barbosa Castro Director of the National Marine Park of Joao Vieira Polao
Boubacar Diatta PCG Abéné [email protected] Cheikh A. Diallo PNLB [email protected] Domingos Gomez
Betunde National Orango Park [email protected]
Fernando Biag PNTC Director [email protected] Georges Faye PCG-‐RNCP [email protected] Lamine Sayang Curator, Niumi National Park [email protected] Mamadou Ndiaye Curator Joal-‐Fadiouth MPA [email protected] Mar Mbaye PDT CG AMP CAYAR [email protected] Maxim Sagna APCRM, APAC KAWAWANA
Mignane Sarr ST LOUIS MPA [email protected] Moustapha Ciss RNIC SOMONE [email protected] Nuha Jammeh DPWN /TWNP [email protected] Paul Moise Diedhiou Curator, Abéné [email protected] Quintino Tchantchalan
Queba IBAP-‐UROK Representative [email protected]
[email protected] Salatou Sambou APCRM, APAC KAWAWANA [email protected] Saliou Mbodji RNIC SOMONE [email protected] Sekou Kourouma Curator, Loos Islands MPA [email protected] Sutay S. Saniol DPWM/TBR [email protected] Wolimata Thiao POPENGUINE MPA [email protected]
SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL MEMBERS Bocar Kanté RAMPAO Scientific Council [email protected] Grazzia Borrini RAMPAO Scientific Council [email protected] K. Jo Mulongoy RAMPAO Scientific Council [email protected] Kelleher Graeme IUCN/RAMPAO [email protected]
REPRESENTATIVES OF GOVERNMENT/ NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AND MPAs El hadj Omar Youm Minister of land-‐use Planning and
Local Councils
Baidy Ba Chief of Staff of the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development
Abdoulaye Diop DAMCP Director [email protected] Aboubacar Oularé Minitry of Environment, Plant
Protection and Parks of Guinea /RAMPAO
Ebrima Jallow DPWM Director [email protected] Kamissa Baldé OGUIPAR [email protected] Mamadou L. Kassama DPWM Director [email protected] Ousainou Touray DPWM [email protected] Quintino Tchantchalan IBAP-‐UROK Representative [email protected]
24
Souleye Ndiaye DPN Director [email protected] TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL PARTNERS
Abdoulaye Diop DAMCP Director [email protected] Ahmed Diamé Greenpeace Africa [email protected] Ahmed Senhoury UMC, PRCM Director [email protected] Aissata Dia FIBA Project Manager [email protected] Alioune Ba GIDEL/EDEQUE UCAD [email protected] Amadou Matar Diouf IUCN [email protected] Araujo Antonio Program Coordinator, FIBA [email protected] Babacar Ndiaye CC/MEDD [email protected] Babacar Salif Gueye MEDD [email protected] Charlotte Karibuhoye Program Coordinator, FIBA [email protected] Claude Sène APTE [email protected] Diallo Mariam IRD [email protected] Ebrima Sall CODESRIA S.E Exé[email protected] Emanuel Ramos FIBA [email protected] Guillaume Durin OCEANIUM [email protected] Jean Goepp Directeur. NEBEDAY [email protected] Julien Semelin Program Coordinator, FIBA [email protected] Kalidou Coly CT/MIN P.A.M [email protected] Khady Sané Diouf USAID/COMFISH [email protected] Laurent Godefroy Cooperation Adviser /French
Embassy [email protected]
Lena Matsuda ECOFUND [email protected] Malle Diagana Project Manager, WWF [email protected] Mamadou Diallo WWF [email protected] Maman Sani Issa World Bank [email protected] Markus Faschina ECOFUND [email protected] Mathieu Ducrocq MACO, IUCN [email protected] Mme NDIAYE, Rokhoya DAGE MEDD [email protected] Mutone Yoann MPA Coordinator, OCEANIUM [email protected] Nathalie Cadot Monitoring/Evaluation Manager,
FIBA [email protected]
Oumy Ka Communication Manager, DPN [email protected] René Marie Coly Badiane DEEC/MEDD Richard Dacosta Wetlands Internationale Africa [email protected] Samuel Dième Popenguine MPA Curator [email protected] Simon Meriaux Program Coordinator, FIBA [email protected] Sokhna Ndiaye Program Assistant, FIBA [email protected] Sylvie Goyet FIBA Director [email protected] Taibou ba Program Officer, CSE [email protected] Thialy Faye CIVIL FORUM [email protected]
RAMPAO SECRETARIAT Ousmane Kane Chairman [email protected] Dominique Duval-‐Diop Secretary General [email protected] Paul S. Tendeng Research and Database Officer [email protected] Coura Doumbouya Communication Officer [email protected]
25
Detailed agenda
Final Agenda for the 5th RAMPAO General Assembly
Location: ONOMO Hotel, Dakar, Senegal Dates: November 22 - 23 2013 Reporters: Paul Tendeng/Coura Doumbouya/Aissata Dia
DAY 1 Opening Ceremony (9h – 10h) – Welcoming remarks from the current president of the GA/ Colonel Ousmane Kane – Opening remarks from: Graeme Kelleher, Member of the Scientific Council and Ocean Elder
world expert, Ahmed Senhoury, Director of the PRCM Sylvie Goyet, Director of the FIBA – Official opening remarks:
o Remarks of the Minister of the Environment, Water and Forests of Guinea o Official opening speech of the Minister of Environment and Sustainable Development
of Senegal Coffee break (10h – 10h30) RAMPAO Institutional presentations (10h30 – 13h)
– Presentation and validation of the agenda (5 min) – Presentation of the implementation of the 4th General Assembly recommendations (15 min) – Presentation of the activity report and discussion (30 min) – Presentation financial report and discussion (20 min) – Election of the new President of the General Assembly (5 min)
Technical Presentations
– Presentation and discussion of technical and financial partner initiatives des o WWF (The impact of the EU/UNDP project on the RAMPAO network and its MPAs)
(10 min) o PRCM (The role of MPAs in the new partnership) (10 min) o SFRC– Presentation of the results of the State of the Art study on MPAs and
fisheries (10 min) Discussion Lunch break (13 – 14h30) Presentations continued (14h30 – 16h)
o FIBA – Biocos, Pact and Alcyon Projects (10 min) o IUCN (10 min) o Wetlands International –Mangrove Project (10 min)…
Discussion – Presentation and analysis of member actions (problems, assets, et ideas etc…)
o OGUIDAP – Guinea (10 min) o IBAP – Guinea Bissau (10 min) o DPN and/or DAMPC – Senegal (10 min) o DPWM – The Gambia (10 min)
Discussion Coffee break (16h – 16h30)
26
Presentations continued (16h30 – 18h)
– New ideas/innovations in support of the network o MPA-Fisheries working group (15 min) o Gap analysis report/Impact of the study on the CBD EBSA process (15 min) o Presentation of the road map for the revision of the regional MPA strategy (30 min)
Discussion and closing of the first day
DAY 2 Opening of the 2nd day Institutional matters (9 – 11h) Session for full members – Presentation and discussion of the new MPA member and associated member candidates – Presentation and discussion of the proposed internal rules
Session for partners and associated members – Discussion of the contribution of associate members and partners to the 2013-2016 strategic
directions and work plan
Coffee break (11h-11h30) Presentations continued (11h30 – 13h) - Presentation and working session on the capacity building needs assessment and development of
a strategy on capacity building
Lunch break (13h-14h30) Presentations continued (14h30 – 16h) – Presentation and validation of the 2013-2016 work plan and the 2014 action plan + budget
Coffee break (16h-16h30) Presentations continued (16h30 – 17h30) – Presentation and discussion of the network communication strategy (15 min) – Presentation and adoption of the Scientific Council recommendations (15 min) – Discussion and adoption of all General Assembly recommendations (30 min)
Closing Ceremony (17h30) – Summary of recommendations – Award of certificates – Remarks of the new president – Official closing remarks of the Minister of Environment and Sustainable Development of Senegal
