Upload
allan-dalton
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Rational theories
Overview of Rational Theories
• Late 1970s – 1980s
• Outgrowth of victimization data
• More conservative criminology
• Borrowed from economic models of behavior
Social Context
• 1970s events• Conservative movement• Oil crisis & Iranian hostage incident• Individual responsibility
• Political use of crime• Crime control & “lock ‘em up” CJS policies• Just deserts punishment philosophy• War on crime and drugs • Victim rights
Intellectual Context
• New methodology and data – victimization statistics
• Concept of “evil” or self-interested person• Effect of Travis Hirschi’s view of human nature• Need for punishment – return of deterrence• Rational nature of humans – offenders responsible for
their own decisions– Incorrect thinking – cognitive &
personality theory
• More efficient CJS was needed
Major Rational Theories
Rational Choice Theory
Cornish & Clark
Rational Choice Theory
Cornish & Clark
Lifestyle TheoryHindelang, Garofalo, & Gottfredson
Lifestyle TheoryHindelang, Garofalo, & Gottfredson
Routine Activitie
s
Cohen & Felson
Routine Activitie
s
Cohen & Felson
Precursors to Rational Theories
The beginnings of rational criminals/victims
Environmental Design (1969/1971)– C. Ray Jeffery creates a form of crime prevention based not
on treating criminal motivation, but on making it more difficult to commit a crime by changing the physical crime environment.
Defensible Space (1972)– Architect Oscar Newman develops a theory of physical
spaces designed to reduce crime, primarily based on territoriality and surveillance of people who live in them.
Routine Activities Theory
7
Lawrence Cohen & Marcus Felson (1979)
•Originally based on changes in routine social behaviors across time– Routine activities are normal daily patterns of social interaction– They involve things like the where & how often:
Going to work Work patternsTime spent at home Recreational activitiesShopping behaviors Dropping off/picking up kids
– Theory evolved from observations of changes in gender-based work/home patterns since WWII with increased burglary rates
Routine Activities Theory: Characteristics
8
• The theory is not particularly interested in offender motivation.
– Focuses on the characteristics of crime rather than on the offender
– Looks at range of options offenders select from when committing a crime
• Has been used to explain:– Rates of victimization for specific crimes– Rates of urban homicide– Hot spots – areas that get a disproportionate number of
crimes
Assumptions of Routine Activities
•Offenders disproportionately find victims in certain settings.
•Three elements of a crime:
•Volume of criminal offenses is related to normal everyday patterns of interaction– Work, leisure, school, errands, socializing
Absence of a
Capable Guardian
Absence of a
Capable Guardian
Suitable Target
Suitable Target
Likely Offender
Likely Offender
Crime Rates and Victimization
Not related to social and cultural conditions
•Crime rates rise with:– An increase in the number of suitable victims – The absence of protectors
•Individuals are more likely to be victimized:– The more they associate with, or come in contact with, members of
demographic groups containing a greater number of offenders (young, males)
Patterns of Routine Activities
Now take place further from home (since WWII)
•Routine patterns of work, play, leisure affect the convergence in TIME and PLACE of motivated offenders, suitable targets, & absence of guardians.
– If one component of 3 is missing, crime is unlikely to be committed– If all 3 are present & one is strengthened, then crime risk is likely to increase
•Theory does not look at offender motivation
Lifestyle Theory
12
Michael Hindelang, James Garofalo, & Michael Gottfredson (1978 article)
•Originated in an attempt to explain different victimization rates among groups of people
•Those with patterns of activities (lifestyles) which bring them more frequently into contact with criminals and criminal environments are more likely to be victimized– Time of day, frequency of nighttime activities, physical location of activities
Lifestyle Elements
13
• Social roles– Based on expectations of others, individuals construct
lifestyles more conducive to victimization
• Position in social structure– Victimization rates are the inverse of social status, based on
normal places frequented and activities
• Rational decisions– Choices to engage in more or less risky behavior
Similarities of Victim & Offender
14
Similar demographics & lifestyles
•People who are disproportionately victimized by personal crimes have demographic traits similar to those who are offenders.
•These demographics are NOT causal, but are indicators of:– Constraints (structural, economic, family, legal)– Expectations (roles, duties, schedules)
Lifestyle Characteristics
15
• Same people often alternate between offender & victim (in serious assaults) in both official (police) reports & self-reports
• Lifestyle patterns are determined by adaptations (individual & subcultural) to structural constraints & role expectations
• Intervening variables of associations & exposures determine whether or not victimization results from lifestyle
Rational Choice Theory
16
Derek Cornish & Ronald Clarke (1986/7)
•Crime is a way to meet basic needs– Usually monetary, usually property crime
•Rationality is a decision-making process– What opportunities exist?– What are the potential costs of action?– What are the anticipated benefits?
•Does not require full rationality, sophisticated thinking, or accurate information
Components of Rational Decision
17
Two types of decisions
Details can vary by type of crime – part of the reason why offenders specialize
Involvement DecisionsIs it worthwhile?
Are risks reasonable?Or pass up opportunity?
Event Decisions
Tactics (methods) are acceptable, easy enough – helps to justify
involvement
Policy Implications of Rational Theories
18
Crime prevention
Improve environment for feel of safety• Use adjacent businesses, parks, shops, nearness
of suitable activities• Target hardening
Neighborhood Watch
Mapping of crime “hot spots”
Design greater costs and reduce benefits of offenses
Policy Implications: Environmental Design
19
Typical approaches to indicators of refuge, prospect, & escape
Refuge for potential offender• Tall shrubs, alcoves, blind corners
Prospect for user• Long lines of sight, wide angle of view
Escape for user• Multiple exit points close at hand
The Ecology of Crime
20
Routine Activities, Defensible Space, Crime Prevention
Guardians are not the only inhibitors of crime• Look at architecture, use of space, traffic patterns,
lighting, vegetation
Combines traditional techniques with new technologies (electronic IDs, CCTV)
Target hardening