Upload
lamya
View
118
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
WP/6. RCP and RSP. Planning and implementation. Presented to:SOCM/2. By:Tom Kraft [email protected]. Date:8-10 February 2012. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Federal AviationAdministrationRCP and RSP
Date: 8-10 February 2012
Presented to: SOCM/2
By: Tom [email protected]
Planning and implementation
WP/6
RCP and RSP planning8-10 February 2012 2Federal Aviation
Administration
Introduction
• While the Asia/Pacific Region has an implementation plan for performance-based navigation no regional plan exists for the implementation of performance-based communication and surveillance
• A number of States in the Region have reduced separations that are predicated on certain communication, surveillance, and navigation requirements
• With an increasing proliferation of different aircraft FANS 1/A systems, and given current ground system implementations, it is possible that separations may be misapplied because the qualification criteria for communication and surveillance are not formally applied within the Asia/Pacific Region
RCP and RSP planning8-10 February 2012 3Federal Aviation
Administration
Background• In 2008, SOCM/1 recognized the concept of performance-based framework for
communications and surveillance, prescribing global performance specifications and ensuring compliance
• In 2010, in accordance with ICAO Annex 6 and Doc 4444, GOLD provided
– Required Communication Performance (RCP) and Surveillance Performance (RSP) specifications
– Guidelines on prescribing specifications in airspace where reduced separations are predicated on certain communication, navigation and surveillance performance requirements
– Guidelines to States to aid in qualifying components of the operational system to the criteria prescribed by the performance specifications, including ANSP post-implementation monitoring
• In 2010, APANPIRG formally adopted the GOLD
– Supersedes the FANS 1/A Operations Manual (FOM)
• APANPIRG and other ATS coordinating groups need to continue to manage the GOLD implementation concerning communications and surveillance performance
RCP and RSP planning8-10 February 2012 4Federal Aviation
Administration
Planning initiatives
• As implementation of reduced separations, in trail and climb/descent procedures, reroutes and other operational capabilities becomes more widespread, the regions of the world will need to plan for and implement a global performance based framework for communications and surveillance
RCP and RSP planning8-10 February 2012 5Federal Aviation
Administration
Planning initiative examples
• In June 2011, the North Atlantic Region System Planning Group endorsed its RCP and ADS-C Surveillance Performance Based Operations Implementation Plan, with an effective implementation date of February 2015.
• In March 2011, the ISPACG agreed to support the development of a performance-based framework for communications and surveillance within the region. ISPACG encouraged its ANSP members to implement system performance monitoring per the GOLD as an element of their respective safety management system (SMS) programs
RCP and RSP planning8-10 February 2012 6Federal Aviation
Administration
NAT RCP/RSP planning tasks (1 of 2)
# Summary of task Lead Complete By Calendar Due Date
1 Draft RCP/RSP implementation plan CNSG IMG/38 & SPG/47 Completed
2 Identify Key Target Dates IMG IMG/38 & SPG/47 Completed
3 Confirm applicable performance specifications SARSIG IMG/38 & SPG/47 Completed
4 Update/develop operational concepts/procedures for data link services, RLongSM, RLatSM
ATMG w/CNSG
IMG/40 & SPG/48 May & June 2012
5 Develop GOLD material GOLD WG SPG/46Amend SPG/49
June 2010
June 2013
6 Develop procedures for non-normal operations ATMG w/CNSG
IMG/40 & SPG/48 May & June 2012
7 Develop procedures for service restoration ATMG w/CNSG
IMG/40 & SPG/48 May & June 2012
8 Develop standards and guidance for flight plan descriptors
CNSG w/ICAO
IMG/40, SPG/48, 12th ANC
May, June & Nov 2012
9 Draft/update PfA for Doc 7030 (Regional SUPPs) CNSG w/ATMG
IMG/42 & SPG/49 May & June 2013
10 Amend AIPs and other State documents States Consistent with PfA May & June 2013
11 Implement RCP/RSP monitoring capability ANSPs Most ANSPs - 4Q 2011, required before trial start
Jan 2013
RCP and RSP planning8-10 February 2012 7Federal Aviation
Administration
NAT RCP/RSP planning tasks (2 of 2)
# Summary of task Lead Complete By Calendar Due Date
12 Measure performance for feasibility ANSPs, DLMA, CNSG, SARSIG
Ongoing, prior to operational implementation
Jan 2015
13 Provide ICAO/regional guidance to States on operator eligibility/aircraft equipage
OPSAIR SG IMG/42 and SPG/49 May & June 2013
14 Develop State guidance material, operational readiness
SOG, States, ANSPs, Users
End 2014, prior to operational implementation
Dec 2014
15 Conduct post-implementation monitoring/analysis
ANSPs, CNSG, DLMA
Ongoing after operational implementation
2015 and beyond
16 Clarify the interpretation of RCP and surveillance specification in terms of compliance/non-compliance
CNSG IMG/42 & SPG/49 May & June 2013
17 Conduct workshops to raise awareness on RCP and surveillance performance
States Start pre-trial, complete prior to Operational Implementation
2012 - 2015
NAT RCP/RSP implementation plan
Global
J
2011
F M A M J J A S O N DD
Plan update• Target dates • Performance specifications
J
2012
F M A M J J A S O N D J
2013
F M A M J J A S O N D J F M
NAT States/ANSPs/DLMA
GOLD, NAT Doc 006/007• ADS-C conformance monitoring• Procedures for reroutes, non-normal operations• Flight plan indicators for specifications• Operator/aircraft approval guidance update• Technical/monitoring updateGuidance on operational approvalDraft PfA NAT Doc 7030 - RLongSM, RLatSM
Proposed PANS/ATM & GOLD Amendment
GOLD performance monitoring
New York – < 2010 Gander – 1Q/2011Shanwick – 4Q/2010 Santa Maria – 2Q/2011
Reykjavik –3Q/2011
Shannon –1Q/2013Bodo – TBD
4
GOLD Jun 2010
11 11 10, 14,17
11
DLMA Jun 2009
Plan DraftJun 2008
NAT SPG/47
NAT SPG/48
NAT SPG/49
RLongSM Trial
Data Link Mandate
State AIPs & other docs
5, 8
Mature RCP/RSP
Plan
Proposed GOLD AmendmentNAT Doc 006/007
Draft PfA NAT Doc 7030
12th ANC
Issue PANS/ATM & GOLD Amendment
5, 8
NAT SPG/49• Adopt GOLD Amendment • Process PfA
OPLINKPOPLINKP
NAT Groups1, 2, 3 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 16 9
1
5, 9, 13,16
GOLD AmendmentPfA NAT Doc 7030
12, 15
NAT RCP/RSP implementation plan
Global
J
2014
F M A M J J A S O N DD J
2015
F M A M J J A S O N D J
2016
F M A M J J A S O N D J F M
NAT States/ANSPs/DLMA
GOLD performance monitoringState AIP and other documents
Operational readiness
GOLD amendment Jun 2013PANS/ATM amendment Nov 2012
NAT SPG/50
NAT SPG/52
5, 8
NAT Groups
5, 9GOLD NAT adoptionPfA NAT Doc 7030
10, 14, 15, 17
15
Coordination
Program management
10, 14, 17
Performance-based Concept
RLongSM RLatSM
NAT SPG/51
RCP and RSP planning8-10 February 2012 10Federal Aviation
Administration
Purpose
• The performance-based framework is intended to fulfill a States obligation to ensure that the operational system meets requirements for intended uses
• The framework will enable optimum use of technologies, such as Iridium and SwiftBroadband, and implementations, such as I4 Classic Aero and Iridium Next
RCP and RSP planning8-10 February 2012 11Federal Aviation
Administration
What needs to change
• To implement a performance-based communications and surveillance framework, changes will be needed to:
– Type design approval of aircraft, as necessary
– Master Minimum Equipment List (MMEL) policies
– Related operational authorizations
– Regional SUPPs (ICAO Doc 7030 Amendments) and AIPs (or equivalent)
– Flight plan requirements
– ATC automation to act appropriately based on communication and surveillance equipment and capability indicators provided in the flight plan
RCP and RSP planning8-10 February 2012 12Federal Aviation
Administration
Other applications
• It is expected that the performance-based framework would eventually apply to satellite communications (SATCOM) voice for air traffic control per the SATCOM Voice Guidance Material (SVGM)
– SVGM is currently under development by the Inter-Regional SATCOM Voice Task Force (IRSVTF)
RCP and RSP planning8-10 February 2012 13Federal Aviation
Administration
Conclusion
• A regional – but globally compatible – plan is needed throughout the Asia-Pacific Regions for the implementation of performance-based framework for communication and surveillance
RCP and RSP planning8-10 February 2012 14Federal Aviation
Administration
Action by the meeting
3.1 The meeting is invited to:
a) Note the information in this paper
b) Cooperate with other regions and sub-regions within the Asia-Pacific Regions and North Atlantic Region
c) Recommend to APANPIRG to include in its work program a planning and implementation initiative to effectively implement a performance based-framework Asia-Pacific Regions
RCP and RSP planning8-10 February 2012 15Federal Aviation
Administration