Upload
alyssa-sawyer
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Re-establishment of Cadastral Boundaries following the Canterbury
Earthquakes, September 2010 to June 2011
Mark Smith, Mack Thompson, Don Grant
Land Information New Zealand
NZIS/SSSI Conference 23-25 November 2011Wellington, New Zealand
Where Were these Quakes?
Fault shear and distortion
Liquefaction and surface flow
Effects on Boundaries
• Block shifts Deep
• Shearing Deep
• Angle distortion Deep
• Surface flow Shallow
• Landslip Shallow
• Rock Fall Shallow
New Zealand Cadastral Survey System
• Supports Torrens title system
• Integrated with geodetic
• Private sector surveyors
• Cadastral Survey legislation
• Hierarchy of evidence
• Old Monuments have priority
• Certainty of boundaries desired
Surveyor-General’s Concerns
Earthquake affect on cadastral boundaries
• How to re-establish boundaries?
• Statutory intervention required?
• Surveyors’ legal authority?
Precedents?
– No NZ Statute or regulation
– No common law
– Napier Earthquake (1931)
– Prior NZ examples
– Few overseas precedents
– Alaska (1964) and California (1971)
Statutory intervention required
Boundary Re-establishment
Deep Seated Movement• Boundaries move with the surface
• Extra angles created in fault-span boundaries
Shallow surface Movement• Boundaries remain relative pre-EQ positions
Specific non-compliances sanctioned by S.G.
Managing the Spatial Cadastre
Further Information
Proceedings of this conference
And
LINZ web site
http://www.linz.govt.nz/
Search for “earthquake”