50
Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

  • View
    216

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Read:

Sacks for Thursday

Loftus for Tuesday

Vokey for Thursday

Page 2: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Iconic Memory

• a brief storage of “raw data” in the visual system

Page 3: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Echoic Memory

• Auditory information is stored in a similar sensory “buffer”– Echoic memory seems to last for several

seconds

Page 4: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Properties of Sensory Memory

1. Brief (iconic ~500ms; echoic ~2 seconds)

Page 5: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Properties of Sensory Memory

1. Brief (iconic ~500ms; echoic ~2 seconds)

2. Virtually unlimited capacity

Page 6: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Properties of Sensory Memory

1. Brief (iconic ~500ms; echoic ~2 seconds)

2. Virtually unlimited capacity

3. pre-attentive

Page 7: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Overview of Memory

• Atkinson-Shiffrin Model

Sensory Signals

Sensory Memory

Short-Term Memory

Long-Term Memory

ATTENTION

REHEARSAL

RETRIEVAL

Page 8: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Short-Term Memory

• process by which we hold information “in mind”

Page 9: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Short-Term Memory

• process by which we hold information “in mind”

• example: temporarily remembering a phone number

Page 10: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Characteristics of STM

• Duration? Capacity?

• How could one measure these parameters?

Page 11: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Characteristics of STM

• Limited Duration– Brown-Petersen Task:

• subject is given a trigram (e.g. C-F-W) to remember

• vocal rehearsal is prevented by counting backwards

• recall accuracy tested as a function of retention interval

Page 12: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Characteristics of STM

• STM decays over seconds

Page 13: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Characteristics of STM

• Limited Duration– Brown-Petersen Task Interpretation:

rapid loss of information in STM (over a period of seconds…much longer than sensory memory)

Page 14: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Characteristics of STM

• Limited Capacity– How might you measure capacity?

Page 15: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Characteristics of STM

• Limited Capacity– George Miller – Subject is given longer and longer lists of

to-be-remembered items (words, characters, digits)

Page 16: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Characteristics of STM

• Limited Capacity– George Miller – Subject is given longer and longer lists of

to-be-remembered items (words, characters, digits)

– Result: Subjects are successful up to about 7 items

Page 17: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Characteristics of STM

• Limited Capacity– What confound must be considered ?!

Page 18: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Characteristics of STM

• Limited Capacity– What confound must be considered ?!– Recalling takes time !

Page 19: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Characteristics of STM

• Limited Capacity– What confound must be considered ?!– Recalling takes time !– It seems that the “capacity” of STM (at

least measured in this way) depends on the rate of speech - faster speech leads to apparently larger capacity

– Some believe capacity is “2 - 3 seconds worth of speech”

Page 20: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Forgetting from STM

• Why do we “forget” from STM?– Does the memory trace decay?

• not likely because with very small lists (like 1 item) retention is high for long intervals

Page 21: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Forgetting from STM

• Why do we “forget” from STM?– Does the memory trace decay?

• not likely because with very small lists (like 1 item) retention is high for long intervals

– Instead, it seems that information “piles up” and begins to interfere

Page 22: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Forgetting from STM

• Interference in STM is complex and specific

Page 23: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Forgetting from STM

• Interference in STM is complex and specific

• For example, severity of interference depends on meaning

Page 24: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Forgetting from STM

• Interference in STM is complex and specific

• For example, severity of interference depends on meaning– Subjects are given successive recall tasks

with list items from the same category (e.g. fruits)

– final list is of either same or different category - how is good is recall on this list?

Page 25: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Forgetting from STM

• Accuracy rebounds if category changes

Page 26: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Coding in STM

• How is information coded in STM?

Page 27: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Coding in STM

• Clues about coding in STM:– # of items stored in STM depends on rate of speech

Page 28: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Coding in STM

• Clues about coding in STM:– # of items stored in STM depends on rate of speech– phonological similarity effect: similar sounding words are harder to store/recall than different

sounding words

Page 29: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Coding in STM

• Clues about coding in STM:– # of items stored in STM depends on rate of speech– phonological similarity effect: similar sounding words are harder to store/recall than different

sounding words

What does this suggest about the nature of information in STM?

Page 30: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Coding in STM

• It seems that information can be stored in a linguistic or phonological form

Page 31: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Coding in STM

• It seems that information can be stored in a linguistic or phonological form

Must it be stored this way?

Page 32: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Coding in STM

• It is also possible to “keep in mind” non-verbal information, such as a map

Are there two different STM systems?

Page 33: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

A Modular Approach to STM

Articulatory Loop

Central Executive

Visuospatial Sketchpad

Experiment 1 in the article by Lee Brooks demonstrates a double dissociation between Articulatory Loop and Visuospatial Sketchpad

Page 34: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Working Memory “Modules”

• Lee Brooks: interference between different representations in STM (Experiment 1)– Memory Representation

• verbal task: categorize words in a sentence• spatial task: categorize corners in a block letter

– Response Modality• verbal response: say “yes” or “no”• spatial response: point to “yes” or “no”

Page 35: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Working Memory “Modules”

• result:

Per

form

ance

Response Modality

Verbal Spatial

Spatial Representation(categorize corners)

Verbal Representation(categorize words)

Page 36: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Working Memory “Modules”

• Interpretation:– supports notion of modularity in Working Memory (visuospatial sketchpad / articulatory loop)

Page 37: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Model of Memory

Turning now to Long-Term Memory

Sensory Signals

Sensory Memory

Short-Term Memory

Long-Term Memory

ATTENTION

REHEARSAL

RETRIEVAL

Page 38: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Long-Term Memory

• Characteristics (intuitive with some introspection):

– Persists indefinitely (up to decades!)

– Requires no active process of rehearsal (at least that we are conscious of)

Page 39: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Long-Term Memory

• Characteristics (intuitive with some introspection):

– Persists indefinitely (up to decades!)

– Requires no active process of rehearsal (at least that we are conscious of)

– What are some examples of Long-Term Memories?

Page 40: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Some Distinctions in LTM

• Endel Tulving: There are two broad categories of information that are represented in LTM -

• Examples:– What did you eat for breakfast?– What is the capital of Canada– Where were you when…– Are maple trees deciduous?– Riding a bike !?

Page 41: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Some Distinctions in LTM

• Endel Tulving: There are two broad categories of information that are represented in LTM -

• Episodic Memory: memory of an event in your life

• autobiographical• has a temporal context - something about time is

encoded along with the memory

Page 42: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Some Distinctions in LTM

• Endel Tulving: There are two broad categories of information that are represented in LTM -

• Semantic Memory: memory of facts, knowledge of the world

• unconnected to an autobiographical event• no temporal context

Page 43: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Some Distinctions in LTM

• A third category may be distinguished:– Example: riding a bike, playing an

instrument

Page 44: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Some Distinctions in LTM

• Procedural Memory: memory for actions

Page 45: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Semantic Memory

• Capacity is huge (unlimited?)

Page 46: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Semantic Memory

• Structure of encoding is associative

Page 47: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

Semantic Memory

• Structure of encoding is associative– This idea is formalized in so-called

“connectionist” networks

birdcanary

chicken

mockingbird

To Kill A Mockingbird

racism

highschool

Martin Luther King

skiing

Mr. Lacey

English

Page 48: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

When You Don’t Remember

• Two reasons why you don’t remember:

Page 49: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

When You Don’t Remember

• Two reasons why you don’t remember:

• Unavailable– It wasn’t successfully encoded - something went wrong while

you were studying

Page 50: Read: Sacks for Thursday Loftus for Tuesday Vokey for Thursday

When You Don’t Remember

• Two reasons why you don’t remember:• Unavailable

– It wasn’t successfully encoded - something went wrong while you were studying

• Inaccessible– memory is stored but cannot be retrieved, perhaps because appropriate connections aren’t being

made