View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Recent Developments in THERMUS
“The Wonders of Z”
Spencer WheatonDept of PhysicsUniversity of Cape Town
Statistical-Thermal Model
Fireball resulting from high-energy heavy-ion collision treated as an ideal
gas of hadrons
At freeze-out these hadrons are assumed to be described by local
thermal distributions
Chemical Freeze-out:
multiplicities fixed
Thermal Freeze-out:
momenta fixed
THERMUS – Statistical-Thermal Model Analysis within ROOT
SW, J. Cleymans and M. Hauer, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 84.
SW, PhD Thesis, UCT (2005)
17 152 lines of codeDecays & properties of 361 hadrons 24 C++ classes
… and growing!
Grand-Canonical Ensemble: B, S, Q & E conserved on
average
Strangeness Canonical Ensemble: S conserved exactly;
B, Q & E conserved on average
Fully Canonical Ensemble: B, S & Q conserved exactly;E conserved on average
THERMUS performs calculations within 3 commonly applied statistical
ensembles:T, B, S, Q, V
T, B, S, Q, V
T, B, S, Q, V
THERMUS has proved extremely successful in describing hadron
multiplicities and ratios… but like all statistical models it battles to reproduce
the K+/+ “horn”:
(J. Cleymans, H. Oeschler, K. Redlich and SW,
Phys.Lett.B615:50-54, 2005)
Estimate of rest of Resonance Spectrum
Including high-mass resonances (and meson) improves the situation:
(Andronic, Braun-Munzinger, Stachel Phys.Lett.B673:142,2009)
Baryons and Mesons with u, d and s quarks
up to 2.6 GeV( meson included) …
2005 Particle Set:
2010 Particle Set:Dawit Worku (UCT) has since updated
the THERMUS particle set to
include also c and b quarks …
Extended THERMUS Particle Set
With extended particle set comes need for extension in ensembles. So, coming soon:
B, S, Q, C and b GCES, C and b CE
Fully B, S, Q, C and b CE
But what about calculations beyond particle multiplicities and mean values?
Work on fluctuations and correlations with Michael Hauer (Frankfurt) has all been
done within THERMUS …
Statistical Thermal Model: Ensembles and Partition
Functions Micro-canonical ensemble: Fixed E, P and B, S, Q, C, b …
Canonical ensemble: Fixed B, S, Q, C, b …
Grand-canonical ensemble: Nothing Fixed Exactly
, , , exp , ,GCE ll
Z V u V u
1
3
33
ln 1
2
jjl l
jjl l
p u q
ll
p u q
d p eg
d p e
3
32states
Vd p
Grand Canonical Ensemble:
Canonical Ensemble (Traditional Approach):
, , , , ,2 2 2
exp , ,
i B S QQ B S QQ B S Q SBCE
ll
dddZ V u e
V i u
Quantum Stats
Boltzmann Stats
3
32
p ui ii
g Vz d p e
Chemical potentials gone!
include flow here
, , ,2
exp , ,
, ,
jj
ii
JiQQ
J
ll
Q QCE
dV u e
V i u
e Z V u
Z
Retain the chemical potentials & project out the GCE partition function:
, , ,
, , ,
, , ,
B S Q
B S Q
Q B S Q
Canonical Ensemble (Alternative Approach):ala Michael Hauer
Example 1: Static Pion Gas (conserved Q)
Q
5 integrandCE
QZ 5 integrandQZ
as in GCE
Q
T = 150 MeVR = 6 fm
Boltzmann Approximation:
50 integrandCE
QZ
Chemical potential in Z is a free parameter, but
choose well and oscillations cease or at
least are reduced!
Q
/ /, , exp2
exp exp 2 cosh cos2
cos cos 2 sinh sin
sin sin 2 sinh sin
Q Q Q Q QiQ T i T iQQQ
Q QQ
QQ Q
QQ Q
dV e ze ze z
dz z
T
Q zT
Q zT
Z
Little bit of work required to get integrand into a manageable form:
de Klerk, Hauer, SW
Example 2: Full HR Gas
iQ QCE
QCE
Z
Z
Canonical Correction for hadron with charge
content Bi, Si, Qi :
0
iQ Qi iCECE GCEQ
CE
ZN N
Z
BSQ ensemble implemented in THERMUSuses result of Becattini and Keranen to
calculate correction factors …
a) Becattini & Keranen - Static Boltzmann:
, , , exp 22 2
cos arg
exp 2 cos
QQ B S Q SCE n B
Neutrals n
S Q
m m S m QMesons m
ddZ V z I
S Q B
z S Q
3D 2D integration,
but still oscillatory
expb b S b QBaryons b
V z i S Q Q
S Works well for THERMUS BSQ ensemble
1
2
1
2
, , ,
, , ,
ii iQ QQ Q Q QCE
Q Q QCE
Z V Ve
Z V Ve
Z
Z
Choose chemical potentials to smooth out integrands in both numerator and
denominator- much easier to integrate
A Carbon-Carbon
Correction Factor
Symmetry of before
disappears, so 3D integration
needed
Hauer, de Klerk, SWb) Approach using :
, , exp2 2 2
exp 2 cosh cos
cos cos 2 sinh sin
sin sin 2 sinh sin
QB S Q SBn
Neutrals n
j j jParticles j
j j jParticles j
j j jParticles j
dddz
z
Q z Q Q
Q z Q Q
Z
Only 13 distinct quantum content
combinations
So, on the cards is the application of this numerical technique to the
B,S,Q,C,b ensemble in THERMUS…
An analytic result has recently been derived by Beutler et. al.
arXiv:0910.1697
Beutler et. al. arXiv:0910.1697:
Canonical treatment of B, S, Q, C and b: Quantum statistics for lightest bosons…
5D integration 3D integration Bessel functions
, ,
/ , ,
/
, ,
1
number of states with , and ,
number of states with
,
( , )
, ( , , )
( , , ) ( , )
, ,
A B
CE
CE
Q A B
CE
Q
CE
A B
A Bce A B
Q N N
Q
Q T Q N N
GCEQ T Q
GCE
Q N NGCE
QGCE
gce A B gce
Q N NP N N
Q
Z V
Z V
e Z V Z V
Z V e Z V
Z
Z
P Q N N P Q
ZZ
Starting point for fluctuations & correlations is again the partition
function: E.g.
4,
4, , ,2 2
exp , ,
jj
JiQ iPQ P
J
ll
d dV u e e
V i u u i
Z
1 2
1 2
, ,...,
0
...!
n
n
nj j j
n j j jn
i
n
, ,Q P =Q
(Taylor expansion)
0
eq
ZQ
Approximation good if chemical potentials and four-
temperature chosen such that:
Micro-Canonical Ensemble:
/2
1 1/21
1 1/22
, , , 1 1 1exp
, , , det 22j
GCE jJGCE
jj k k
k
V uP
Z V u V
V V
k
Z Q
Q
Q
Large Volume (Thermodynamic) Limit:
22
2 22 2
X X
XX
A B A BAB
A A B B
N N
N
N N N N
N N N N
GCE mean
Multi-variate normal distribution
To get joint particle multiplicity
distributions in various ensembles need to consider
slices through GCE distribution
ala Michael Hauer
Neutral Pion Gas (+,-,0) in MCE (large V)
Correlation coefficient within bin…..
Correlation coefficient between bins : no dynamics!
- at T = 160 MeV
– & at T = 160 MeV
M. Hauer, G. Torrierri & S.W.
Correlation between disconnected momentum space bins (no dynamical
effects)
M. Hauer, G. Torrierri & SW
V1
Monte Carlo Particle Generator
V2
V1: observed sub-system
V2: unobserved
Vg = V1 + V2 : total system
Constraints placed on system are imposed
only on the total volume
1
g
V
V
M. Hauer & SW published
The crux is the following:
1
1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
, ; ,1 1 1 1
, ,, , , ,
, ,
; , , , , , ,
i
j jg g
j jg g gj i j
Njg g g
P Q P Q j ig j gce j
Z V V P P Q QP P Q N Z V P Q
Z V P Q
V V u P P Q N u
W
1 1
1 1
, ; ,1 1
,1,
,
/21
; , , , , ,
, ,
, , ,
1 1 1exp
2 11
j jg g
jjg g
jg g
P Q P Qg j GCE j
P P Q Qg j
P Qg j
llL
V V u Z V u
V V u
V u
V
W
Z
Z
Strategy of Monte Carlo Generator:
1)Sample sub-system V1 Grand-Canonically in Boltzmann Approximation
2)For each particle of type i, generate a momentum magnitude following a
Boltzmann Distribution:
3)Assign direction to particle assuming isotropic particle emission…
4)Allow 2 and 3 body decays
5) Reweight
System Considered
Neutral , Static , T = 160 GeV and V1 = 2000 fm3
B, S, Q, E, Pz considered for reweighting
= 0
S(s) = -1 Q(s) = -1/3
Prim
ordi
al N
E [GeV] E [GeV]
Str
ange
ness
Con
tent
Strangeness ContentBaryon Content
p Z [
GeV
/c]
Cha
rge
Con
tent
= 0.25
Prim
ordi
al N
E [GeV] E [GeV]
Str
ange
ness
Con
tent
Strangeness ContentBaryon Content
p Z [
GeV
/c]
Cha
rge
Con
tent
= 0.50
Prim
ordi
al N
E [GeV] E [GeV]
Str
ange
ness
Con
tent
Strangeness ContentBaryon Content
p Z [
GeV
/c]
Cha
rge
Con
tent
= 0.75
Prim
ordi
al N
E [GeV] E [GeV]
Str
ange
ness
Con
tent
Strangeness ContentBaryon Content
p Z [
GeV
/c]
Cha
rge
Con
tent
Averages Variances
Co-Variances Correlation Coefficients
20 runs of 2.5 × 104 events
Linear extrapolation to MCE
Divide into 5 bins such that each
bin contains 1/5th of positives
Momentum Bin Selectionpositives
positives
Extrapolating Variances to
MCE20 runs of 105 events
Linear extrapolation to MCE
primordial
primordial
Largest baryon and strangeness content in pT,5
Linear extrapolation
to MCE
Non-Linear extrapolation
to MCE
Extrapolating Covariances and Correlation Coefficients to MCEprimordial
primordial
20 runs of 105 events
Concluding Remarks
THERMUS proven itself in analysis of mean valuesNew extended particle set should allow better description of data.
Recent work aimed at extending functionality to include fluctuation and correlation analysis A Monte Carlo Particle Generator has been developed
In the process a new technique for the calculation of canonical correction factors has been developed