Recent Findings of Endothelial Function Tests from FMDJ study Hirofumi Tomiyama MD Professor of Cardiology, Tokyo Medical University

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Recent Findings of Endothelial Function Tests from FMDJ study Hirofumi Tomiyama MD Professor of Cardiology, Tokyo Medical University
  • Slide 2
  • Why we need to assess endothelial function?
  • Slide 3
  • NormaI IMT IMT Hypertrophy We have carotid ultrasound examination IMT Plaque
  • Slide 4
  • Kitta Y et al. 83 83 J Am Coll Cardiol 2009 Coronary Artery disease 251 Suessenbacher A et al. 85 85 Vasc Med 2006Coronary Artery disease 68 Modena 8484 J Am Coll Cardiol 2002 Hypertension 400 The improvement of FMD by treatment is related to the improvement of the prognosis
  • Slide 5
  • Endothelial function test has a potential to be a marker for the managements (not only diagnosis) of cardiovascular disease/its risk factors
  • Slide 6
  • Method Coronary or Peripheral artery Vascular bed Measuremen ts StimulusInvasive Coronary epicardial vasoreactivity CoronaryConduit Vessel diameter Infusion of endothelial dependent vasodilator + Coronary microvascular vasoreactivity CoronaryResistanceBlood flow Infusion of endothelial dependent vasodilator + FMD Peripheral (brachial artery) Conduit Vessel diamete r Reactive hyperemia RH-PAT Peripheral (finger microvas culature) Resistance Plethys mogram Reactive hyperemia Methods Used to Assess Endothelial Function
  • Slide 7
  • RH-PAT FMD & RH-PAT FMD
  • Slide 8
  • 2.5.4. Brachial/Peripheral Flow-Mediated Dilation FMD 2.5.4.1. Recommendation for Brachial/Peripheral Flow-Mediated Dilation Class III: No Benefit The technique requires a highly skilled sonographer, highly standardized measurement conditions (including time of day, temperature, drug administration), and suitable ultrasound machine. Many examiners also use specialized computer software to semiautomatically quantitate the brachial artery diameter. Considerable variability exists for values of FMD determined by different investigators, even in similar patient populations, suggesting technical challenges with the measurement. Circulation. 2010 Dec 21;122(25):e584-636. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults : a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.
  • Slide 9
  • Reflects disease state Reversible with interventions Mirrors coronary endothelial function Improves risk stratification Reproducible Operator independent Noninvasive (no or low risk for the patient) Ease of use Inexpensive Criteria for an Optimal Endothelial Function Test Circulation.Circulation. 2012 Aug 7;126(6):753-67. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.093245. The assessment of endothelial function: from research into clinical practice. Flammer AJ Flammer AJ 1, Anderson T, Celermajer DS, Creager MA, Deanfield J, Ganz P, Hamburg NM, Lscher TF, Shechter M, Taddei S, Vita JA, Lerman A.Anderson TCelermajer DSCreager MADeanfield JGanz P Hamburg NMLscher TFShechter MTaddei SVita JALerman A
  • Slide 10
  • Is data of FMD reliable ?
  • Slide 11
  • A multicenter study design to assess the clinical usefulness of semi-automatic measurement of flow-mediated vasodilatation of the brachial artery. Tomiyama H, Kohro T, Higashi Y, Takase B, Suzuki T, Ishizu T, Ueda S, Yamazaki T, Furumoto T, Kario K, Inoue T, Koba S, Watanabe K, Takemoto Y, Hano T, Sata M, Ishibashi Y, Node K, Maemura K, Ohya Y, Furukawa T, Ito H, Yamashina A. Int Heart J. 2012;53(3):170-5.
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Training for FMD measurement in FMDJ study
  • Slide 14
  • To examine the reliability of FMD data analyzed in each institute FMD data analyzed in each institute Number of participating institutes was 19 Analyzing data was loaded on WEB site Independent analysis of FMD image at core laboratory Send USB including the image of FMD without analyzing data Compare the results of both analyses
  • Slide 15
  • Are FMD and RH-PAT interchangeable?
  • Slide 16
  • Adjustment FMD PercentHyperemic Flow Velocity r*r* Pr*r* P PAT ratio Unadjusted 0.094