21
Recent Results from Direct Searches for Dark Matter with the XENON100 Experiment Institutstreff, 07 July 2011 Cyril Grignon XENON group, JGU

Recent Results from Direct Searches for Dark Matter with the …xenon.physik.uni-mainz.de/presentations/institut_treffe... · 2012. 3. 16. · Dark Matter: One of the big unsolved

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Recent Results from Direct Searches for Dark Matter with the

    XENON100 Experiment

    Institutstreff, 07 July 2011

    Cyril Grignon

    XENON group, JGU

  • 2

    Evidence of Dark Matter

    DM Halo surrounds our galaxy: good for detection !

    NASA/WMAP

  • 3

    Looking for Dark Matter

    Particles collider (LHC): production and

    detection (missing E)

    Indirect detection: search products of an

    annihilation

    Direct detection: search for a WIMP-nucleus scattering within a

    detector

    Lots of candidates for Dark Matter : not in the standard model.

    This candidate is: Long lived, Massive and undergo weak interaction

    WIMP (weakly interacting massive particle), thermal relic

    A popular candidate: the neutralino, as the lightest supersymetric particle (GeV-TeV)

    Direct detection needed to prove that DM is coming from the Halo

  • 4

    1 event/kg/yr

    1 event/ton/yr

    WIMP ExpectationsCMSSM: Trotta et al.CMSSM+LHC: Buchmueller et al.

    WIMP Direct Detection

    WIMP

    v ~ 230 km/s

    Recoil energy :

    Events rate :

    We need:- low E threshold- heavy nuclei- low background

    Er < 100 keV

    Rate from particle physics, nuclear physics and cosmology :

    R < 0.01 evt/kg/day

  • 5

    Backgrounds in Direct DM Search

    Depth [meters water equivalent]Depth [meters water equivalent]

    Muon inten sity [m

    -2y-1]

    Background Sources: α decays from Rn daughters..

    and Decays (electron recoil) careful material selection, discrimination, shielding (Pb, Cu, Xe, Ar, water) Neutrons from (,n) in rocks neutron moderators (paraffin, poly, water) Neutrons from cosmic ray muons: Rate depending on depth. go deep underground

    Electronic Recoils Nuclear Recoils(gamma, beta) (neutron, WIMPs)

  • 6

  • 7

    DM Direct detectors overview

    Bubble FormationCOUPP, PICASSO

    IonizationCoGeNT

    ScintillationDAMA/LIBRAKIMS, XMASS,DEAP/CLEAN

    Phonons

    LAr: WARP, ArDMLXe: XENON, LUX, Zeplin

    CDMS-II, Super-CDMSEDELWEISS-II

    CRESST-II,ROSEBUD, EURECA

    TrackingDrift, DM-TPC, NIT

  • 8

    Liquid Xenonefficient, fast scintillator (178nm) high mass number A~131: SI: high WIMP rate @ low threshold high Z=54, high ~3 kg/l: self shielding, compact detector SD: 50% odd isotopes allows further characterization after detection by testing only SI or SD no long lived Xe isotopes, Kr-85 can be removed to ppt "easy" cryogenics @ –100°C scalability to larger detectors in 2-phase TPC: good background discrimination

    M = 100 GeV, = 10-45 cm2

  • 9

    The Liquid Xenon Dual Phase TPC Ionization + Scintillation

    Wimp recoil on Xe nucleus in dense liquid (2.9 g/cm3) → Ionization + UV Scintillation

    Detection of primary scintillation light (S1) with PMTs.

    Charge drift towards liquid/gas interface.

    Charge extraction liquid/gas at high field between ground mesh (liquid) and anode (gas)

    Charge produces proportional scintillation signal (S2) in the gas phase (10 kV/cm)

    3D position measurement: XY (from S2), Z (e- drift time): resolution ~ mmelectron recoil rejection to >99% via ionization/scintillation ratio (S2/S1)Multiple scatter rejection

  • 10

    XENON100

    161 kg LXe TPC 62 kg in target volume active LXe veto (≥4 cm) 242 PMTs (low radioactivity < 1mBq/PMT for U/Th) passive shield (Pb, Poly, Cu, H2O)

  • 11

    XENON100 Background

    Measured Background in good agreement with MC prediction.

    At low energies: Lowest background ever achieved

    in a Dark Matter Experiment!

    Xenon keVee-Scale not precisely known below 9 keVee

    30 kg fiducial mass active LXe veto not used for this plot exploit anti-correlation between light and charge for better ER-energy scale

    No MC tuning!Values from

    screening only.

    PRD 83, 082001 (2011)

    arXiv:1103.2125

  • 12

    3D localization

    164 keV electron recoil

    S1

    S2

    3D reconstruction with mm resolution:- Fiducial cut to remove background- identify single/multiple scatter events

    Phys.Rev.Lett.105:131302,2010

  • 13

    Discrimination electron/nucleus recoils

    99.75 % rejection @ 50% acceptance

    definition of WIMP search region (ROI)

    Co60

    AmBe

    -ray source

    Neutron source

    ER Band

    NR Band

  • 14

    Data analysis

    Consistency Cuts: - S2 width cut (drift time ok? gas events) - position reconstruction - anomalous event rejection

    single scatterinteraction

    anomalousevent pattern

    cathode

    gate grid

    blinded region

    - data taken in first half of 2010- 100.9 life days- data blinded in ROI (Region Of Interest) defined with cuts optimized with calibration data

    Data quality:- keep period with stable detector- remove period with electronic noise

    Fiducial volume: - keep events inside the 48 kg

  • 15

    Data analysis

    S2 threshold

    Energy window

    Energy Cuts - low E region (S1) - S2 software threshold - require 2x S1 coincidence (against PMT dark current, noise)

    Single Scatter Selection (WIMPs interact once !): - only one S2 peak - only one S1 peak - active veto cut - S1 PMT Pattern - S2 PMT Pattern (good xy reconstruction required)

    NR calibration

  • 16

    99.75 ER rejection

    3 NR acceptance

    Expected Background for - 48 kg fiducial mass - 100.9 live days - 99.75% ER rejection

    Gaussian Leakage:1.14 ± 0.48

    Anomalous Leakage:

    0 .56 ± 0.25 Neutron Background:

    0.11 ± 0.08

    Total: 1.8 ± 0.6 events

    prediction based on data and MC

    prediction verified on high E sideband

    Background prediction

  • 17

    Observe 3 events likelihood for 3 or more events is 28% No observation of a WIMP signal !

    calculate limit

    Unblinding the data

    Total expected background for the 100 days:

    1.8 ± 0.6 events

    arXiv:1104.2549, submitted to PRL

  • 18

    XENON100 new limit

    preliminary

    90% CL

    New Re

    sult!

    100.9 live days, exposure: 1471 kg×d Profile Likelihood limit based on side-bands from calibration Best SI limit over a large mass range. Minimum σs = 7.0×10-45 cm2 @ 50 GeV/c2 Strong tension with low mass WIMP interpretation for DAMA, CoGeNT, CRESST Inelastic DM as explanation for DAMA annual modulation ~ ruled out.

  • 19

    Summary

    XENON100

    XENON1T

    Dark Matter: One of the big unsolved puzzles

    XENON100: the most sensitive experiment for WIMP direct detection

    Best SI limit achieved : 7.0×10-45 cm2 @ 50 GeV/c2

    Currently run 10 ongoing: 2.0×10-45 cm2 by the end of the year

    Next step : XENON1T, goal of 10-47 reached by 2015

  • 20

    Next step: XENON1T 2.4T LXe ("1m³ detector"), 1T fiducial mass 100x lower background (10 cm self shielding, QUPID) Timeline: 2010 – 2015 start construction end of 2011

    See XENON posters !!

    0.95 m

    1.05 m

    XENON1T @ LNGS

    5 m water shield acting as active muon veto

    10 m

  • 21

    The XENON Collaboration

    Slide 1Slide 2Slide 3Slide 4Slide 5Slide 6Slide 7Slide 8Slide 9Slide 10Slide 11Slide 12Slide 13Slide 14Slide 15Slide 16Slide 17Slide 18Slide 19Slide 20Slide 21