Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
RECOGNITION OF EUROPEAN EXAMS
Zeev Goldik
Factors
◦ Organiser
◦ Language
◦ Financial
◦ System
National Recognition
◦ Societies
◦ Colleges
◦ Boards
◦ Universities
◦ Ministry of Health
◦ Medical Association (Chamber)
Purpose
◦Educational tool
◦Harmonisation
◦Neutral
◦Reform!
Personal experiences in European Exams Positive
◦ Excellence / Europe-wide quality mark
◦ Harmonization / comparing standards leading to an impetus for improvement
◦ Assist countries with training aspiration
◦ Acceptance by some countries/ help free movement specialists
◦ Broad participation (from outside EU)
◦ Patient safety
◦ Cooperation : scientific societies, academics
Switzerland
1987/88
1993
Hungary
Poland
Dear Professor Goldik,: Dear Zeev
In conjunction with our previous talks with You and the President of ESA, Sir Peter
Simpson and following your meeting with representatives of the Polish Ministry of
Health, the Director of the Centre of Medical Examinations, the National Advisor in
Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, and the Board of the Polish Society of
Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, I am declaring readiness to introduce
written part of the European Diploma in Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care
(EDA) as a part of the Polish National Exam in Anaesthesiology and Intensive
Therapy since autumn, 2008.
Poland
Netherlands
Last Monday the Council of the Netherlands Society of
Anaesthesiology has discussed the modernized national training
program of Anaesthesiology, of which I had the privilege to be one of the architects. Starting the implementation of this program,
it was realized that the old exam structure had to be renewed as
well. Then the discussion was started whether the European
Diploma would not be a very good alternative.
The result is that the Council last week decided to recommend the
Board of the Netherlands Society to adopt the European Diploma.
Malta
Austrian Recognition
◦At its meeting on 28th January 2009, the Austrian
Medical Chamber decided:
◦ “The Board of Examiners of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Medicine and the Scientific
Society recognize the ESA Exams EDA part I and EDA part II as equivalent to the
Austrian Medical Chamber Specialist Exam in Anaesthesiology and Intensive Medicine”
Romania
◦ Adoption of the European Exam as obligatory part of the national
program in anaesthesia
◦ The exam will be bilingual
Romania
Turkey
Turkey
Slovenia
Prof.Brigita Drnovšek-Olup MD PhD, Medical director UMC Ljubljana Prof.Pavel Poredoš MD PhD, Head of Clinical Department for vascular diseases, President of Slovenian Medical Association Associate Prof. Zlatko Fras MD PhD,Medical Director of Division of Internal Medicine, President of UEMS Prof Vesna Paver- Eržen MD PhD,councillor, Prof. Vesna Novak-Jankovič MD PhD, Head of Clinical Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, President of Slovenian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Medicine
Egypt
In total: 58 centres for the European Diploma
part I all over the globe
New Part I Centers in 2014-2015
• Belgrade
• Buenos Aires
• Genoa
• Nijmegen
• Rotterdam
• Tbilisi
• Ankara
• Maastricht
• Salzburg
New centres in 2016
◦ Bilbao
◦ Florianopolis
◦ Fortaleza
◦ Helsinki
◦ Marakesh
◦ Marbella
◦ Montevideo
◦ Rio de Janeiro
◦ Sao Paulo
Candidates EDAIC part II
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
19
85
19
86
19
87
19
88
19
89
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
Pass Fail
THE EUROPEAN DIPLOMA IN ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE IS OFFERED IN:
1. English
2. German
3. Spanish
4. French
5. Italian
6. Russian
7. Polish
8. Hungarian
9. Romanian
10. Portuguese
11. Turkish
12. Chinese
Countries where EDAIC is recognized
◦ Switzerland
◦Austria
◦Hungary
◦Poland
◦Netherlands
◦Romania
◦Malta
◦UK
◦ Ireland
◦ Finland
◦ Turkey
◦ Slovenia
◦Moldova
◦Portugal
◦Czech Republic
◦Egypt
Mutual Recognition
◦
Irish College of Anaesthetists
◦Reciprocity (Mutual recognition)
Finance
◦ Fees
◦ Sponsorship
System
◦ Written
◦ Oral
◦ Computer based
◦ Marking System
◦ Formative vs. Summative
Thanks
