Upload
sherman-daniels
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
RECOMMEND
Status Quo of preparing the RIPs
Lead Partner PP01Benjamin Kuscher
1st April 2014 /
Ascoli Piceno / IT
1st April 2014
Overview: now - then
2
Short description about your challanges which hinder respectively make the implementation of eco friendly actions difficult:
*) xxxxx*) xxxxx*) xxxxx*) xxxxx*) xxxxx
our solution
1. An eco-management consulting internet platform
2. An online tool “My eco-expert”
Both will be used to strengthen transparency regarding
- qualification,- experience, - competence and - licensees of all consultants
The target is to light out the funding jungle
Our current situation• Each eco-funding scheme in Lower Austria manages its own pool of experts (often the same persons) and wants to keep control. • There is a lack of cooperation between the eco-funding institutions.• There are already existing search tools but with specific needs for specific institutions – • The tools are used only by one organisation.• Finding the appropriate external eco-expert or eco-funding scheme is not easy enough
Planned actions to be implemented via the RIP:
1st April 2014
Key facts on RIP
Target of “MY ECO-EXPERT”:Improvement of the effectiveness & transparency of eco-management practitioner networksImproving the cooperation of ALL institutions supporting eco-management and eco-innovation in Lower AustriaIdentifing synergies between the different funding schemes
Organisational issues:Goals of RIP actions are clearly definedOutputs are clearly definedResults are clearly definedTarget groups are clearly definedtimeline & the to-dos per time and per stakeholder are clearly definedFor the pilot action all necessary stakeholders are aware and agreed;Budget for technical realisiation of tools is availableConflicts could not be avoided fully – but conflicts will be reduced when the tool is working (baseless fears will be eliminated)There are no legal changes necessary Training: will be held in 2014
1st April 2014 3
SWOT of LA RIP
1st April 2014 4
Strengths Weaknesses
Everything is in time (preparation of RIP & Pilot Action; Goals, Outputs, results, target groups, TO Dos, stakeholders of / for RIP & Pilot actions are clearly defined
For the pilot action all necessary stakeholders are aware and have agreed;
staff for actual setup is available Budget for setup is available
staff for future adjustments is not defined Awareness raising campaign not defined yet potential conflicts with stakeholders are
identified but not clearly described; Not all outputs are measurable like
environmental indicators
Opportunities Threats
Common tool will strengthen transparency regarding qualification, experience, competence and licensies of all consultants in LA.
Improvement networks between eco-management practitioners
Improvement networks among LA institutions supporting eco-management / eco-innovation
New synergies between the diff. funding schemes Improving transparency and services for clients
for the future existing of the tool single key stakeholders are missing (aware but not agreed)
A similar in house tool has already been used by Chamber of commerce
future budget is not defined Strategic & political changes within LA
system
Successes of future RIP
E-mobility strategy of Lower Austria will be adjusted according to the input from Estonia.
Ökomanagement will be internationally transferred
Ökomanagement takes up strategic promotion activities from IIE in the UK
The LA RECOMMEND RIP will be in line with all other RIPs in LA
1st April 2014 5
RECOMMEND
Status Quo of preparing the RIPs
Kujawsko-Pomorskie RegionRafał Modrzewski
1st April 2014 /
Ascoli Piceno / IT
Output of RIP
Developing and supporting clusters (including eco-clusters)
System of clusters supporting
ROP improvement
Increasing of quality
Involving external
stakeholders
Innovation vouchers
New system of vouchers distribution
ROP improvement
Increasing of quality
Involving external
stakeholders
Tightening cooperation
business-science
1st April 2014 7
Why was this topic chosen for RIP?
Developing and supporting clusters (including eco-clusters)
Comes from the regional strategy
Undesirable effects of cluster initiatives
Continuation of the pilots actions
The only way to increase competitiveness
Promotion of entrepreneurship and economic growth in the region and engaging in actions for sustainable development
Innovation vouchers
Continuation of success story
Implementation of new
voucher schemes
Promotion of regional R&D
institutions and
entrepreneurship
1st April 2014 8
What should be improved via RIP?
Developing and supporting clusters (including eco-clusters)
instruments supporting cluster-
related projects and actions
(including eco-clusters);
cluster operator
Innovation vouchers
follow-up implementation of voucher scheme (1)
new voucher scheme (2)
based on good practice from
the South Moravian Innovation
Center;
Competition on voucher
operator
21.04.23 9
Effects, synergies for the region?
Developing and supporting clusters (including eco-clusters) entrepreneurs, research entities and other
stakeholders interested in the project – striving to create and develop a cooperative relationship
implementation of new pro-environmental solutions,
building up external contacts, competing successfully on the local, regional
and international market, expanding and strengthening cooperation
between enterprises and research entities creating a cluster,
designing a common path of investment development,
increasing the accessibility of business support services,
eco-products, pro-environmental production/ service processes
Innovation vouchers
implementation of two voucher
schemes
cooperation of enterprises and
research entities
new pro-environmental
solutions
21.04.23 10
Who will support the RIP?
Developing and supporting clusters (including eco-clusters)
operator chosen in an open competition (expand the range of instruments with which they can foster these processes and help them gain new experience)
Innovation vouchers
21.04.23 11
Risks for a successful implementation of RIPPlease state on this page challegnes where you do not have any suitable solution at the moment-> these challenges / threats / weaknesses will be discussed together with project partners; target of this group session is to get new input from outside which might help you to find a solution how to address your challenges
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Short description (key words are enough) of challenge, weakness or threat
Law changing
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Short description (key words are enough) of challenge, weakness or threat
R&D entities and entrepreneurs cooperation
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Short description (key words are enough) of challenge, weakness or threat
Experienced Operator
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Short description (key words are enough) of challenge, weakness or threat
interest in providing green solutions
1st April 2014 12
RECOMMEND
Status Quo of preparing the RIPs
PP4 – EkoportJan Jareš
1st April 2014 /
Ascoli Piceno / IT
1st April 2014
Title & Output of RIP
Title: Pilot innovation voucher scheme Output / result of RIP:
definition of most promising tools for (eco)innovation uptake in the region of South Bohemia
case studiesdesign and preparation of pilot innovation voucher
schemetime plan and responsibilities setupconcrete measures in order to ensure sustainability
1st April 2014 14
Key facts on RIP Why was this topic chosen for RIP?
as a result of regional assessment and SWOT analysis (lack of collaboration between R&D and industry)
What should be improved via RIP?concrete supportive and operational mechanisms within
regional innovation strategy real and tangible impact of top level decision makers on
(eco)innovation development in the region
Effects, synergies for the region?new supportive scheme / tool in accordance with RIS and S3
Who will support the RIP? Regional innovation agency, Regional Authority, etc.
1st April 2014 15
Risks for a successful implementation of RIP
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Short description (key words are enough) of challenge, weakness or threat
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
CHto accelerate collaboration between R&D and industryto encourage local R&D capacities towards applications
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Winability to integrate “eco” aspects in the very first call
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Tsome internal administrative prejudices (e.g. drawing lots)first call failure
1st April 2014 16
RECOMMEND
Status Quo of preparing the RIPs
LEA Spodnje Podravje Uroš Majerič
1st April 2014 /
Ascoli Piceno / IT
Title & Output of RIP
Title: Bionics Cluster
Output / result of RIP: Establishment of Bionics Cluster
1st April 2014 18
Key facts on RIP
The topic was chosen beacuse of increasing studies in the field of Bionics
A nowel approach to raise eco management and eco innovation in our region
1st April 2014 19
Key facts on RIP
What should be improved via RIP?Members colaboration in the regionAwareness rising in the field of energy
efficiency and bionics Increase of eco innovation it the region
1st April 2014 20
Key facts on RIP
Effects, synergies for the region?Accelerating the implementation of EMAS,
ISO 50001 and ISO 140001Acceleration of eco-innovations and bionics
innovationsProviding LCA assessment for companies
1st April 2014 21
Key facts on RIP
RIP Supporters International Institute for Energy BionicsCollege of Bionics PtujSTENG Ltd. – National Cleaner Production
Centre
1st April 2014 22
Risks for a successful implementation of RIPPlease state on this page challegnes where you do not have any suitable solution at the moment-> these challenges / threats / weaknesses will be discussed together with project partners; target of this group session is to get new input from outside which might help you to find a solution how to address your challenges
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Short description (key words are enough) of challenge, weakness or threat
Financing issuies
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Attract municipalities
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
1st April 2014 23
RECOMMEND
Status Quo of preparing the RIPs
PP6 Tartu Regional Energy AgencyMartin Kikas
1st April 2014 /
Ascoli Piceno / IT
Title & Output of RIP
Title: Contest „Eco-friendly company of the year“
Output / result of RIP: Systematic Eco-innovation and environmental management activities launched in Tartu. We expect to see the public and private sectors awareness and motivation to rise and increase the implementation of environmental management systems
(e.g. implementation of voucher, data base, cluster, funding system etc..
1st April 2014 25
Key facts on RIP
Why was this topic chosen for RIP? - Different stakeholders (public and private) have low awareness of eco-innovation and eco-management. Insufficient motivation to implement eco-management systems and eco-innovation tools as it is not seen as a profitable for business
What should be improved via RIP? - We expect to see the public and private sectors awareness and motivation to rise and increase the implementation of eco-innovation solutions
Effect, synergy for region? - To encourage private and public organsations to develop and implement environmental and climate friendly measures
1st April 2014 26
Next steps to be taken before getting RIP signed - The elaboration of the rules and criterias for the contest “Eco-friendly company of the year”
who will sign the RIP? – Member of Tartu City government and board member of Tartu Science Park
Any idea when your RIP will be signed? – September the latest
21.04.23 27
Risks for a successful implementation of RIPPlease state on this page challegnes where you do not have any suitable solution at the moment-> these challenges / threats / weaknesses will be discussed together with project partners; target of this group session is to get new input from outside which might help you to find a solution for your challenges
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Short description (key words are enough) of challenge, weakness or threat
Political changes
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Short description (key words are enough) of challenge, weakness or threat
Low number/interest of participants
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Short description (key words are enough) of challenge, weakness or threat
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Short description (key words are enough) of challenge, weakness or threat
1st April 2014 28
RECOMMEND
Status Quo of preparing the RIPs
PP07 Ascoli PicenoClaudio Carlone
1st April 2014 /
Ascoli Piceno / IT
1st April 2014
Title & Output of RIP
Title: A: ITACA Protocol
B: Eco-Management Vouchers
Output / result of RIP:• Systematic application of the regional system for
evaluation and certification of environmental sustainability of buildings
• Transfer and implementation of Eco-Management Vouchers scheme
1st April 2014 30
Key facts on RIP
Why was this topic chosen for RIP?ITACA protocol is already included in to the
Regional Energetic and Environmental Plan;Eco-Management Vouchers could foster the
implementation of environmental and eco-friendly measures (specific focus in energy sector).
What should be improved via RIP?To raise the awareness about the implementation of
eco-innovative solutionsTo support practical appllication of eco-innovation
1st April 2014 31
Key facts on RIP
Effects, synergies for the region?The EEPP (Energetic and Environmental
Provincial Plan)-RIP will represents a strategic guidelines for the implementation of regional/territorial efficiency/energy saving & eco-innovation measures.
Who will support the RIP?Regional and Provincial AuthoritiesR&D institutions/UniversitiesBusiness organisations
1st April 2014 32
Risks for a successful implementation of RIP
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Institutional changes due to political reforms (affecting the Province’s structure)
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Low participation of the private sector
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Lack of funds for Eco-Management Vouchers implementation
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Short description (key words are enough) of challenge, weakness or threat
1st April 2014 33
RECOMMEND
Status Quo of preparing the RIPs
PP09 Opportunity PeterboroughRod Gilchrist
1st April 2014 /
Ascoli Piceno / IT
1st April 2014
Title & Output of RIP
Title: Development of Peterborough wide green manufacturing cluster, EMS cluster club and Eco design training
Output / result of RIP: Cluster club established with 50 members, advice support and training to establish EMS systems and Eco design to at least 20 companies. Secure LEADER status/EU funding
1st April 2014 35
Key facts on RIP
Why was this topic chosen for RIP?Peterborough Economic Development What should be improved via RIP? Eco Management and Eco Innovation at
SMEs in Peterborough Who will support the RIP? Local Enterprise Partnership, Local CouncilsChamber of Commerce and local SMEs.
1st April 2014 36
Risks for a successful implementation of RIP
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
STAFF
Short description (key words are enough) of challenge, weakness or threat
Staff expertise and resource
1 key word
Budget
External funding
1st April 2014 37
RECOMMEND
Status Quo of preparing the RIPs
Project Partner UBBSLAMariana Ivanova
1st April 2014 /
Ascoli Piceno / IT
Title & Output of RIP
Title: Establishment of scheme of Voucher supporting Energy innovation at local level
Output / result of RIP: Implementation of vouchers for energy saving measures;
Reduction of CO2 emissions, investments in innovation solutions, increasing the energy sustainability, reducing the expenses for energy.
1st April 2014 39
Key facts on RIP
• Why was this topic chosen for RIP?
Energy vouchers are grant with minimum bureaucracy, which will attract the citizens to use it. The voucher will support only measures which will improve the eco-management and eco-innovation.
Key facts on RIP
What should be improved via RIP?
The second biggest expense on annual basic for a Bulgarian family is for energy consumption. The price of the electricity in Bulgaria is the cheapest in EU, but the households are high energy intensive. On the other side most of the Bulgarians didn’t like to use European money from the Operational programs because of the high bureaucracy and a lot of paper work.
Key facts on RIP
Effect, synergy for region?
Vouchers for energy innovation will be implemented for the very first time in the Black sea region. The goal is to check how the scheme will work at local level. As a result we expect reduction of CO2 emissions, investments in innovation solutions, increasing the energy sustainability, reducing the expenses for energy.
Key facts on RIP
Next steps to be taken before getting RIP signed
The awareness raising campaign have to be implemented due to the vouchers schemes is completely unintroduced and unknown at local level.
We have to increase the competences of the city councillors, mayor, district mayors, regional governor, local peoples, utility companies, etc.
Key facts on RIP
Who will sign the RIP?
The desicion have to be adopted by city council and signed by the maoyr of the city.
Any idea when your RIP will be signed?
At the end of 2014.
1st April 2014 44
Risks for a successful implementation of RIPPlease state on this page challegnes where you do not have any suitable solution at the moment-> these challenges / threats / weaknesses will be discussed together with project partners; target of this group session is to get new input from outside which might help you to find a solution for your challenges
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Short description (key words are enough) of challenge, weakness or threat
Lack of understanding– from city consulers, mayors
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Short description (key words are enough) of challenge, weakness or threat
Bureocracy – the procedure have to be adopted by the governor
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Short description (key words are enough) of challenge, weakness or threat
lack of strong wish – it is possible to have disapproval from some part of the sociatey
1 key word which describes main challenge, weakness or threat for a successful implementation of RIP
Short description (key words are enough) of challenge, weakness or threat
Lack of municipality budget – main treat for suceful implementation.
1st April 2014 45