Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BioGrassEnvironmental impact of
energy crops
This novel project investigated thesuitability of Irish grassland, under arange of management intensities, forbioenergy production. The factorsthat were studied included:
Greenhouse gas emissions forclimate change mitigation
Grass biomass yield forbioenergy feedstock
Digestion of grass for heat andelectricity generation
Land application of by-productsfor a closed-loop bioenergysystem
Experiments were conducted in threelocations on the island of Irelandduring 2008-2010.
Crossnacreevy, Belfast
Oakpark, Carlow
Johnstown Castle, Wexford
www.ucd.ie/bioenergy
Bioenergy: Energy generation from agricultural crops(bioenergy) can assist Ireland in reducing its depend-ency on non-renewable energy sources. Harvestedplant material can be anaerobically digested to pro-duce biogas, which can be used to generate heat andelectricity. Agricultural wastes (e.g. slurry, manure)are added to the anaerobic digester in a processcalled co-digestion. Nutrient-rich digestate, a by-product of digestion, can also be used as a fertiliser.
Climate Change: Agriculture contributes 29.1% ofIreland’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, includingcarbon dioxide (CO
2), methane (CH
4) and nitrous ox-
ide (N2O). On the farm, emissions come primarily
from livestock, agricultural wastes, and soil manage-ment. While CO
2is more prominent in the atmos-
phere, N2O and CH
4have greater abilities to trap heat.
N2O is mostly emitted from soils due to fertiliser ap-
plication, whereas CH4
comes from fermentation inlivestock and manure. Any farm that minimizes emis-sion of these gases can contribute to climate changemitigation.
Biochar: Biochar is a soil amendment, similar to char-coal, produced from a broad variety of crops, includ-ing energy crops. CO
2from the atmosphere can be
retained in biochar and once applied to land, this CO2
remains in the ground. Studies show an increase incrop yield following biochar application.
Energy Crops: In a project survey, 172 Irish farmersfrom 25 counties identified their preferred bioenergycrop. 70% were interested in producing bioenergycrops, with Miscanthus, grass and willow being theirpreferred crops. However, conventional bioenergycrops (e.g. Miscanthus and willow) require majorland-use changes (e.g. ploughing, planting, and cropestablishment), which would dramatically change theIrish landscape. In contrast, grass can be used di-rectly for bioenergy production while maintainingecosystem services.
Project background
For more information visit theBioGrass website at
www.ucd.ie/bioenergy
Weather is important when applying fertiliser.Wet ground can lead to high N
2O emissions
due to denitrification.
Digestate has considerable potential as afertiliser for grassland due to its high nitro-gen content and low N
2O emissions.
Co-digestion of grass with slurry may miti-gate greenhouse gas emissions by capturingCH
4that would otherwise be lost during
slurry storage/land spreading.
Biochar improves soil fertility and can alsoreduce N
2O emissions from Irish soil.
Similar levels of biogas can be obtained fromvarious grass species and management in-tensities. Thus, less-intensively managedgrassland, such as former set-aside areas,can be used for biogas production
Grassland conversion to conventional energycrops requires ploughing and herbicide ap-plication, which can lead to increased CO
2
and N2O emissions from soil. Establishment
of these crops should take place as soon aspossible after ploughing and herbicide appli-cation should be minimised.
Recommendations &Contact information
Belfast
Carlow
Wexford W
B
C
W
C
B
110 kg N/ha/yr W
PloughingConventional energy crops require ploughing for es-tablishment and 3-5 years before they reach full po-tential. Ploughing Irish grassland led to CO
2emissions
because uptake of CO2
by plant photosynthesis couldnot take place until a new crop was planted.
Herbicide
Herbicide is typically applied for the first 3 years ofestablishment for conventional energy crops (e.g. wil-low & Miscanthus). N
2O emissions were found to in-
crease after the previous crop was sprayed off prior toploughing.
Biogas production
Current agricultural practices for slurry andgrassland management were compared to biogasproduction from cattle slurry and grass. Anaero-bic digestion for biogas production has the po-tential to reduce on-farm emissions of GHGs.However, adequate digestate storage capacityover summer may be a potential challenge. Di-gestate should be applied in early spring for op-timum efficiency as a fertiliser.
Biogas measurements were collected from sev-eral grass species grown under a variety of man-agement intensities. Approximately, 300 L ofmethane was produced per kg dry matter, irre-spective of species or fertiliser rate.
CELUP Oak Park
BioGrass: Environmental impact of energy cropsProject Outcomes
By-product application
DigestateThe fertiliser replacement value of digestatewas approximately 80% of mineral fertiliser(CAN/urea) for silage yield. Combined N
2O
and CH4
emissions from digestate were 75%lower than emissions from CAN, while emis-sions from urea and digestate were similar.
BiocharIn a laboratory experiment, addition of biocharled to reduced CO
2and N
2O emissions even
when earthworms were present in the soil.
C
Site at Crossnacreevy, Belfast
Site at Oak Park, Carlow
Site at Johnstown Castle, Wexford
C
B
W
C WB
Less N2O emissions occurred from grassland planted
with Cocksfoot variety Donata compared to the Per-ennial Ryegrass variety Portstewart when only asmall amount of fertiliser was applied.
Greenhouse gas emission
Wet soil conditions led to high emissions of N2O after
fertilising. While normally CH4
is changed into lessharmful CO
2in grassland soils, wet conditions can
actually lead to CH4
emissions.
Grassland managed with 425 kg N/ha/yr of mineralfertiliser led to N
2O emissions that were over 5 times
higher than with 110 kg N/ha/yr mineral fertiliser.
B
W
W
Anaerobicdigestion
Mineral fertilisationChoice of energy crop
Set-aside grassland
Intensive grassland
Conventionalenergy crop
Harvest
7.6 t/ha/yr W
13.6 t/ha/yr W
8.5 t/ha/yr B
12.0 t/ha/yr B
0 kg N/ha/yr W
105 kg N/ha/yr B
425 kg N/ha/yr B