18
1 Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact Helen R. Jacobus Department of Hebrew and Jewish Studies University College London Updated July 2018 (original, June 2015; corrected 2017) Nowhere in the ancient Mesopotamian and Mediterranean worlds have as many variant and different calendars been found as at Qumran. The diversity within the 364-day Hebrew calendar corpus is a continuing subject of research. Here, the focus is on two proposed Aramaic zodiac calendars: 4Q318 (4QZodiac Calendar and 4QBrontologion, registered as 4QZodiology and Brontology) and 4Q208–4Q209 (4QAstronomical Enoch a-b ). It is argued that these texts are related and that by adopting this model it should be possible to place some of the hitherto unplaced fragments from 4Q208–4Q209. Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology in Early Judaism (Leiden: Brill, 2014), pp. 305–311 1. Background The proposed Aramaic calendar concerned that arguably is closely related to 4Q208–4Q209 is 4Q318 which is composed of a zodiac calendar, or “selenodromion” that situates the moon’s position in the zodiac for each day of the year in each month. It has a connected “brontologion,” a zodiacal thunder omen text that yields a Mesopotamian-style prediction that is based on the zodiac sign of the moon on the day of the month when thunder occurs. The title of 4Q318 is registered as 4QZodiology and Brontology (critical edition: Greenfield

Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact · Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact · Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology

1

Reconstructing4Q208–4Q209asanAstronomicalArtefact

HelenR.Jacobus

DepartmentofHebrewandJewishStudies

UniversityCollegeLondon

UpdatedJuly2018(original,June2015;corrected2017)

NowhereintheancientMesopotamianandMediterraneanworldshaveasmanyvariant

anddifferentcalendarsbeenfoundasatQumran.Thediversitywithinthe364-dayHebrew

calendarcorpusisacontinuingsubjectofresearch.Here,thefocusisontwoproposed

Aramaiczodiaccalendars:4Q318(4QZodiacCalendarand4QBrontologion,registeredas

4QZodiologyandBrontology)and4Q208–4Q209(4QAstronomicalEnocha-b).Itisargued

thatthesetextsarerelatedandthatbyadoptingthismodelitshouldbepossibletoplace

someofthehithertounplacedfragmentsfrom4Q208–4Q209.

ExpansionofHelenR.Jacobus,ZodiacCalendarsintheDeadSeaScrollsandTheirReception:AncientAstronomyandAstrologyinEarlyJudaism(Leiden:Brill,2014),pp.305–311

1. Background

TheproposedAramaiccalendarconcernedthatarguablyiscloselyrelatedto4Q208–4Q209

is4Q318whichiscomposedofazodiaccalendar,or“selenodromion”thatsituatesthe

moon’spositioninthezodiacforeachdayoftheyearineachmonth.Ithasaconnected

“brontologion,”azodiacalthunderomentextthatyieldsaMesopotamian-styleprediction

thatisbasedonthezodiacsignofthemoononthedayofthemonthwhenthunderoccurs.

Thetitleof4Q318isregisteredas4QZodiologyandBrontology(criticaledition:Greenfield

Page 2: Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact · Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology

2

andSokoloff1995,reproducedwithrevisionsin2000).Thetextsareallfragmentary(see

alsoWise,1994;Albani,1993,1994,1999;Jacobus2010,2011,2014a).

FollowingGezaVermeswhogave4Q318thetitle“AZodiacalCalendarwitha

Brontologion”(1997,361),Isuggestthat4QZodiacCalendarand4QBrontologionisamore

usefuldesignationbecausescholarsneedtobeabletodiscusseitherunitseparatelyina

clearway.Thisessayconcerns4QZodiacCalendarwithoutthebrontologioninrelationto

theextremelyfragmentaryAramaictexts4Q208–4Q209(4QAstronomicalEnocha-b)(critical

editions:Milik,1976;TigchelaarandGarcíaMartínez,2000;Drawnel,2011).

4Q208–4Q209compriseformulaicallywrittentextsthatarepartoftheso-called

AramaicAstronomicalBookofEnochfromQumran.Thefragmentsof4Q209

(4QAstronomicalEnochb)and4Q208(4QAstronomicalEnocha)asfarasisknowndonot

appearintheclassicalEthiopicGe’ezversionof1Enoch,althoughnotallofthemany

Ethiopicmanuscriptshavebeenexamined(fortheGe’ezmanuscripthistoryof1Enochsee

Knibb,1978,1–46;VanderKam,2012,335–352;ErhoandStuckenbruck,2013).

Neither4Q318nor4Q208–4Q209wereknownbeforethediscoveryoftheDeadSea

Scrolls.Ihavesuggestedthatinordertoreconstruct4Q208–4Q209bothmathematically

andmaterially(asfarasisreasonablypossible)thetextsshouldbeconsideredasbranches

fromthesamesourceas4QZodiacCalendar(Jacobus2011,2014a,andforthcoming).

2. 4Q318.4QZodiacCalendar

Thecalendarof4Q318statesthemoon’sschematicpositioninthezodiaconanydayofthe

yearaccordingtoacalendarof360dayyears,thatis,ayearcomposedof12months

consistingof30dayseach.Thisisawell-knownyear-lengthinMesopotamiandivinatory

Page 3: Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact · Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology

3

literature(Brown,2000,113-122;Heeßel2010;Oppenheim,1974;Williams,2002)andasan

ideal,administrativecalendarinthethirdmillenniumBCEinMesopotamia(Brack-Bernsen

2007;Steele,2011).

Ihavearguedthatitisaworkingluni-solarcalendar(Jacobus,2010;Jacobus,2011;

2014a);insuchacalendar,anextralunarmonthisadded(intercalated)atfixedintervals

becausethelunaryearof354daysfallsbehindthesolaryearof365¼daysby11¼days.A

30-daylunarmonth,a13thlunarmonth,isaddedontothestandardlunaryearof354days

—consistingof12months—atrepeatedtwoandthreeyearfrequencies(seeRochberg,

1995).Therefore,tohaveacalendarwithalunardatethatrecursinthesameseasonaleap

monthmustberegularlyintercalatedinafixedcycle.

Inaschematic360-daycalendara30-daylunarmonthcouldhavebeenaddedevery

sixyears,asitwouldfallbehindthesolaryearby5¼dayseachyear,accordingto(Brack-

Bernsen,2007,89),althoughscholarsaredividedastohowthe360-daycalendarmayhave

beeninstitutedinpractice.Brittonstatesthatthe360-daycalendarwas“devoidof

intercalations”(2007,117).

Themoonin4QZodiacCalendarchangeszodiacsignsinafixedsequenceoftwo

days,twodays,andthenthreedaysinarecurringarrangement.Itpassesthroughall12

signsplustheonethatitstartedoutfrom(so,13signsinall)in30daysineachofits12

months(schematicsynodicmonths).Themonth-namesaretheAramaictranslationsofthe

Babylonianmonthsusedinthelatebiblicalbooks,andhaveremainedso-namedinthe

Jewishcalendar.

Page 4: Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact · Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology

4

Itisprobablethat4QZodiacCalendarmaybeaJewish-Aramaicdescendantofsimilar

lateBabylonianzodiacalcalendartextswithwhichitbearsclosestructuralsimilarities.

Thesecuneiformtextssubstitutemonthsandzodiacsignsforcorrespondingconsecutive

numbers;forexample,number1representstheMonthI,andthefirstzodiacsign,Aries

(Brack-BernsenandSteele,2004;Steele2015;188,209,210).Sincethemonth-namesin

4QZodiacCalendarareAramaicversionsoftheBabylonianmonths-namesitishighlylikely

thatthecalendariscloselyrelatedtoitsMesopotamiancousins.

3. 4Q208-4Q209asasecondAramaiczodiaccalendarintheDeadSeaScrollsa. Inrelationto1Enoch

Ihavealsoarguedthat4Q208–4Q209(4QAstronomicalEnocha-b)followsasimilarpattern

to4Q318:thatitisbasicallyaluni-solarcalendarwiththemajormodificationthatthe

cosmological‘gates’numbered1to6inthetextshouldbeidentifiedasthezodiacsigns.

Thisissimilartothesystemofnumber-month-signsubstitutioninlateBabylonian

astrologicaltexts(seeBrack-BernsenandSteele,2004;Jacobus,2011,2014a,2014b;Steele,

2015,opcit).

Thishypothesisisbasedondirectlyrelatingtheordinalnumbersoftheheavenly

gatesin1Enoch,Chapter72,thefirstchapteroftheEthiopicBookofLuminaries(1En.72–

82),notonlyasmonthsbuttocorrespondingzodiacsigns(athesisthatwasoriginally

suggestedbyLaurence,1821).1En.72isconcernedwiththedaylightlengthsoftwo“solar”

monthsoppositeeachotherina364-daycalendarbeginningwiththespringequinox.One

‘gate’representstwomonthsand,itisargued,thetwozodiacsignswithwhichtheyare

cognate.SeeTable1forthedescriptionofthesun’sjourneythroughouttheyearin1En.72

withthenumberedgates,themonthstowhichtheycorrespond,andthezodiacsignsthat

correspondwiththemonths.

Page 5: Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact · Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology

5

Table1.Abasicrepresentationjourneyofthesunin1En.72beginningwithsunriseatthe

SpringEquinoxinGate4,Month1,Aries(the1stsignofthezodiac);Gate4alsorepresents

theMonth6,Virgo(the6thsignofthezodiac)

Neugebauerdefinedtheheavenlygatesin1En.72asthesun’srisingandsetting

pointsonthehorizonduringtheyear:thesunrisesinGate4atthespringandautumn

equinoxes(Month1andMonth6),andsoon(Neugebauer1964,1981).Herejectedthe

interpretationsoftheearliertranslatorsandcommentatorsof1Enochthatthe‘gate’

numbersrepresentedsignsofthezodiaccorrespondingtothemonths(Neugebauer,1979,

156–161.ForthescholarlyhistoryofthezodiachypothesisintheBookofLuminariesin1

En,seeVanderKam,2012,371–373;Jacobus,2014a,263–268).Recentresearchinthe

developmentofMesopotamianzodiacalastronomyhasledtoaresurgenceofinterestin

thesubject(Ratzon,2015).

Page 6: Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact · Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology

6

3b.4Q208-4Q209asacalendar

MilikdescribedtheastronomicalschemeintheseAramaicfragmentsasa“synchronistic

calendar,”maintainingthatthematerialrelatedtothesunandthemooninthetextwere

relatedtoasingleyearoftheluni-solarcalendarofathree-yearcycle,atriennialcycle(Milik

1976,274–275).1

Hecontendedthatthesynchronisticcalendarof4Q208–4Q209wastheequivalent

mathematicallyto364daysofthree(‘solar’)yearsequallingthreelunaryearsof354days,

eachconsistingofalternate29and30daymonths,withtheadditionofanintercalarylunar

monthof30days(364daysx3=354daysx3+30days).

Milikreasonedthatthemanuscriptof4Q209consistedofone354-daylunaryearof

thiscyclethatwas10daysshorterthantheschematic‘solar’year.(Theterm‘solaryear’for

the364-dayyearismisleadingsincethesolaryearisabout365.24daysbutitisusedto

distinguishitfromthelunaryear).

Somelaterscholarshavearguedthatthesynchronisedschematic‘solar’yearwould

be360days,asitisinthezodiaccalendarof4Q318andintheMesopotamianbackground

oftheBookofLuminaries(Albani1993,27–35;1994,82–83;seealsoJacobus2014a,334–

340).Others,thatalthoughthesynchronisedyearof360dayshadbeenexpandedto364

daysatanunspecifiedveryearlystageinitsredaction(BenDov,2008,37,282),4Q209

cannotsupportatriennialcyclemathematically(BenDov2008,129–132).Unlikethe

calendarintheBookofJubilees,thecalendarof4Q208–4Q209doesnotmentionSabbaths,

daysoftheweek,orfestivalsasdosomeofthe364-dayHebrewcalendarsofthepriestly

coursesatQumran.

DrawnelrejectsMilik’smodeloftheluni-solarsynchronisticcalendar,proposing

insteadthat4Q208–4Q209isalunartabledenotingthevaryingtimeperiodsoflunar

visibilityduringthedayandnight(Drawnel,2011,237-259).Hearguesthatthesun’s

presenceinthetextconstitutesscribalinsertionsthatrefertothesun’smovementsduring1Milik’stheoryisfollowedbyEshbalRatzon(2107),whoarguesthatfragmentsof4Q209comefromthetriennialcycleratherthanfromasingleyearofit,asMilikhadcontended.MycounterargumenttoRatzonisforthcoming.

Page 7: Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact · Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology

7

thenight,ratherthantoacalendricalcomponent(Drawnel2011,297–300).Milik’sdata

havebeenacceptedbyTigchelaarandGarcíaMartínez(2000);DukeandGoffhave

suggestedmodificationstothesynchronisticcalendarschemetoincorporateDrawnel’s

thesis(2014).

4Q208–4Q209containthedayofthelunarmonthandproportionsofthemoon’s

“shining”and“darkness”and“concealment”andothertermstodescribethemoon’sdaily

phasesinincrementalfractionsofhalf-seventhsinthetext.Therearealsodifferentverbs

thatdescribeitswaxingandwaningday-by-day(Drawnel2011,237–301).Drawnel’s

reconstructionofthefractionsofthemoon’slightinallthefragments,asfaraspossible,

andhiscontextualisingthisinformationwithina29-dayor30-daymonthscheme,often

fromextremelyscantytext,isavaluableassistancetoscholars.

Theleft-handcolumnofthelargestfragment(4Q209,frg7columniiiinthecritical

editions,renumberedasFragment1intheLeonLevyDeadSeaScrollsDigitalLibrary

website)isakeytextualunit.Itarguablysupportstheinterpretationthatthenumbered

‘gates’intheformulaicstructureoftheAramaictextthroughwhichthesunandmoonrise

andsetcorrespondtothezodiacsigns.

Thedatain4Q209fragment7,columniiibeginwiththesun’smovementsinGate1,

coincidingwithNights8-9ofalunarmonth.Milikcalculatedfromthefractionsinthetext

thatthemonthwasMonthXandhereferredtothedateasthe8thdayofthe10thlunar

month,as“the8thTebeth”usingtheAramaicmonthnameforthe10thmonthintheluni-

solar-triennialcycle,whichhearguedexistedinthetext,isnotrelevanttotheBabylonian

calendarwhichusesa19-yearluni-solarcycle(Neugebauer,1975;Rochberg,1992)].

ThewaxingmoonrisesinGate5forthefirsttimeduringday9ofthelunarmonth

(4Q209,frg7col.iii,lines7-8)andsetsinGate5onNight10(aftersunset,lines8-9),see

Figure1.2

2ThetextforNight9isinterruptedbythepassageofthesun.Themoonappearstosettwice:onceimmediatelybeforetheentryofthesunwithoutagivengatenumber(line5)andthenimmediatelyaftertheentryofthesun,whenitstatesthatthemoonsetsinGate5(line6).Thisseemstobeaduplicationofthepositioninthetextualformulaforthemoonset.Comparetheformulain4Q2093:themoonshines,setsandrisesinGate3onNightandDay4(lines6-8)andwillsetinGate3forthefirsttimeafterithasriseninGate3,onNight5(line8,recon,Drawnel,2011,150-151).MyreconstructioninFigure1andTables2and3,isbasedonasunset-to-sunsetcalendarandassignsthemoon’sgatenumbertothegateinwhichitfirstrose.In4Q208frg24coli.thegatenumberinwhichthemoonrisesisnoted,butnotthegatenumberinwhichitsets(textandtranslation:Drawnel2011,118-120).

Page 8: Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact · Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology

8

Figure1:Basicdiagramtoillustratemoon’sdata(reconstructed)in4Q209frg7columniii:

showingdaysofthemonth,‘gates,’correspondingzodiacsigns,lunarphasesandlunar

fractionsinhalf-sevenths

Convertingthegatenumbersintotheircognatezodiacsigns,andtakingintoaccountthe

lunarfractionsinhalf-seventhsinthetext(fromwhichonecanidentifythephaseofthe

moon,eitherintermsoftimerelations[Drawnel],orvisually,bylinearprogressionsoflight

anddarknessonthemoon’ssurface[Milik,1976;TigchelaarandGarcíaMartínez,2000])

wouldmean,accordingtothehypothesis,thatthesun,whichtakesamonthtotravel

throughonezodiacsign,movesfromSagittarius(Gate1)intoCapricorn(Gate1)thewinter

solstice.

Page 9: Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact · Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology

9

ThemoonsetsinGate5(Taurus)aftersunsetonNight9(however,themoonsetis

duplicatedinthetext,andtheformulaisproblematicatthispoint,asnotedabove),risingin

Gate5onthesamedayforthefirsttime.AsthemoonsetsonNight10,inasunset-to-

sunsetcalendarGate5isassignedtoNight10,notNight9inMonthX,(seeTable1for

correspondingmonthsandzodiacsigns).

UsingMilik’sillustrativeassignation,thefirstnightinquestion,“8thTevet”(4Q209,

fragment7columniii,line1)coincideswiththewintersolsticeinsomeyearsinthe

BabylonianhoroscopesintheMesopotamiancalendar(Rochberg1998,44,78;Jacobus

2011,100,194–200;2014a291–311).Accordingly,thecalendarof4Q208–4Q208maywell

followa19-yearluni-solarcycleknownfromlateBabyloniantexts(Rochberg,1998;Steele

2007)andfromtheGreekMetoniccycledatedto432BCE(PritchettandNeugebauer,1947,

1–14;Neugebauer,1975,622-624;Hannah,2005,55–58).

4. Findings

Itispossibletosubstitutetheexistingnumericaldataofthe‘gates’inthefragments

inthesynchronisticcalendarof4Q208–4Q209withtheircorrespondingzodiacsigns.Ifwe

alsofollowedaschematictwoandthree-dayarrangementofthemoon’sstayineachzodiac

signbasedonasimilararrangementin4QZodiacCalendarandtheincrementsofhalf-

seventhsofthemoon’swaxingandwaningfor29and30-daymonthsreconstructedby

Drawnel,wecouldtheoreticallyreproducethelunaryearin4Q208–4Q209fromthelarger

extantandreconstructedfragments,seeTable2.InTable3,thezodiacsignsandthegate

numbersareplacedtogetherusingtheexistingandrestoredtextinordertoillustratethe

reconstructionfully.Ascanbeseenfromthetables,thesuggestedmodelbeginsonDay1,

MonthI:moonriseinAries,Gate4,a30-daymonth,inacalendarinwhichthedaysbeginat

Page 10: Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact · Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology

10

sunset.Thesignsofthezodiacfollowintheirconsecutiveorderaccordingtotheschematic

arrangementdescribed.Notwonightsintheyearcanhavethesamedata.

Page 11: Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact · Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology

11

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII 29 301 ^ _ ` a b c d e f g h i .5 2 ^ _ ` a b c d e f g h i 1 .53 _ ` a b c d e f g h i ^ 1.5 14 _ ` a b c d e f g h i ^ 2 1.55 ` a b c d e f g h i ^ _ 2.5 26 ` a b c d e f g h i ^ _ 3 2.57 a b c d e f g h i ^ _ ` 3.5 38 a b c d e f g h i ^ _ ` 4 3.59 a b c d e f g h i ^ _ ` 4.5 410 b c d e f g h i ^ _ ` a 5 4.511 b c d e f g h i ^ _ ` a 5.5 512 c d e f g h i ^ _ ` a b 6 5.513 c d e f g h i ^ _ ` a b 6.5 614 d e f g h i ^ _ ` a b c (7) 6.515 d e f g h i ^ _ ` a b c 6.5 (7)16 d e f g h i ^ _ ` a b c 6 6.517 e f g h i ^ _ ` a b c d 5.5 618 e f g h i ^ _ ` a b c d 5 5.519 f g h i ^ _ ` a b c d e 4.5 520 f g h i ^ _ ` a b c d e 4 4.521 g h i ^ _ ` a b c d e f 3.5 422 g h i ^ _ ` a b c d e f 3 3.523 g h i ^ _ ` a b c d e f 2.5 324 h i ^ _ ` a b c d e f g 2 2.525 h i ^ _ ` a b c d e f g 1.5 226 i ^ _ ` a b c d e f g h 1 1.527 i ^ _ ` a b c d e f g h .5 128 ^ _ ` a b c d e f g h i .529 ^ _ ` a b c d e f g h i 30 ^ ` b d f h

Table2:Reconstructionof4Q209lunaryearsubstitutinggatenumbersforzodiacsigns

Toprow:months;leftcolumn:daysofmonth.Themoon’sfractionsinhalf-seventhsofwaxingandwaningfor29and30-daymonthsareinthetwofar-righthandcolumns.Theshadedareasaretheexistingorreconstructedfragmentswith‘gate’numbersKey:Aries^:Gate4;Taurus_:Gate5;Gemini`:Gate6;Cancera:Gate6;Leob:Gate5;Virgoc:Gate4;Librad:Gate3;Scorpioe:Gate2;Sagittariusf:Gate1;Capricorng:Gate1;Aquariush:Gate2;Piscesi:Gate3

Page 12: Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact · Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology

12

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII 29 30

1 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 4c 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h 3i .5

2 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 4c 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h 3i 1 .5

3 5_ 6` 6a 5b 4c 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h 3i 4^ 1.5 1

4 5_ ` 6a 5b 4c 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h 33i 4^ 2 1.5

5 6` 4a 5b 4c 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 2.5 2

6 6` 6a 5b 4c 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 3 2.5

7 6a 5b 4c 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 3.5 3

8 6a 5b 4c 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 4 3.5

9 6a 5b 4c 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 4.5 4

10 6b 4c 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5 4.5

11 6b 4c 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5.5 5

12 4c 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 6 5.5

13 4c 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 6.5 6

14 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 4c (7) 6.5

15 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 4c 6.5 (7)

16 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 4c 6 6.5

17 2e 1f 1g 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 4c 3d 5.5 6

18 2e 1f 1g 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 4c 3d 5 5.5

19 1f 1g 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 4c 3d 2e 4.5 5

20 1f 1g 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 4c 3d 2e 4 4.5

21 1g 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 4c 3d 2e 1f 3.5 4

22 1g 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 4c 3d 2e 1f 3 3.5

23 1g 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 4c 3d 2e 1f 2.5 3

24 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 4c 3d 2e 1f 1g 2 2.5

25 2h 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 4c 3d 2e 1f 1g 1.5 2

26 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 4c 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h 1 1.5

27 3i 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 4c 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h .5 1

28 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 4c 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h 3i .5

29 4^ 5_ 6` 6a 5b 4c 3d 2e 1f 1g 2h 3i

30 4^ 6` 5b 3d 1f 2h

Table3.Reconstructionof4Q208-4Q209lunaryear,withzodiacsignscorrespondingto

the‘gate’numbers(extantgatenumbersinbold).

Page 13: Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact · Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology

13

Theshadedareasdescribedbelowrepresentfragmentswithexistingorreconstructedgate

numbersbasedontextualdata.ThesemaybeidentifiedasdescribingdatesinMonth1,

Month9,Month10,andMonth12.Theselected,abbreviateddatafortheshadedareasare

asfollows(seeDrawnel2011forthefragmentnumberingtranscription,translation,and

restoration).

Month1,4Q209fragment16.Night25:themoonishiddenfor5/7ths;itshinesfor

2/7ths.Night26:themoonishiddenfor5.5/7ths(basedonthefractions,itisa30-day

month).ThemoonisinGate3(Pisces)(line2).

Month9,4Q209fragment7,columnii:Nights23[themoonsetsandentersGate3

(Libra)]toNight27,Gate2(Scorpio).ThemoonsetsinGate2onNight25,andriseson

Night26[inthemorning,sinceitisawaningmoon](lines8,10)(a30-daymonth).

Month10,4Q209fragment3:Night4,themoonis5/7thsdark,andonNight5[the

moonleavesAquarius]themoonsetsandentersGate3(Pisces)(line7);itislightfor

2.5/7thsanditrisesonthesameday[indaylight](line8,restored)(a29-daymonth).

Month10,4Q209fragment7,columniii:Nights8toDay10.ThesunrisesinGate1

(SagittariustoCapricorn);themoonsetsinanunnumberedgateonNight9(lines4-5)and

appearstosetagaininGate5onNight9(line6),risinginGate5onthesameday(lines6-8),

andsetsonDay10(lines8-9)(a29-daymonth).

Month12,4Q208fragment24,columni:Night2toDay6;Night3:themoonis

1.5/7thslightanddarkfor5.5/7ths.ThemoonrisesfromGate4(line3)forthefirsttime

duringDay2(lines1-4),andsetsduringNight3[inGate4](Aries)(lines4-5,reconstructed)

(a29-daymonth).

Page 14: Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact · Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology

14

Usingthistheoreticalsystem,itmaybepossibleeventuallytoreconstructthe

calendricalcyclesoftheAramaiczodiacalcalendarsfromQumranwithmoreprecision.The

implicationofthisresearchisthatitislikelythatinSecondTempleJudaismgroupsusedthe

AramaicandHebrewcalendarsforseparatepurposes.Thereisnoevidencetosuggestthat

theAramaiccalendarswereoflessimportancethantheHebrew364-daycalendarsinthe

Qumrancorpus.Theymayhavebeentaughtwithinthepedagogicframeworkofangelic

mythologyknownfrom1Enoch,andassuchrepresentedanotherformofcalendrical

knowledgethathadbeenmodifiedfromitsMesopotamianrootsforusewithinthecomplex

cultureofearlyJudaism.

References

Albani,M.1993.“DerZodiakosin4Q318unddieHenoch-Astronomie.”Mitteilungenund

BeiträgederForschungsstelleJudentumderTheologischenFakultät7:3–42.

Albani,M.1994.AstronomieundSchöpfungsglaube:Untersuchungenzumastronomischen

Henochbuch.WissenschaftlicheMonographienzumAltenundNeuenTestament68;

Neukirchen-Vluyn:Neukirchener.

Albani,M.1999.“Horoscopes.”Pages279–330inP.W.FlintandJ.C.VanderKam,eds.The

DeadSeaScrollsAfterFiftyYears:AComprehensiveAssessment.Vol.2.Leiden:Brill.

BenDov,J.2008.HeadofAllYears:AstronomyandCalendarsatQumranintheirAncient

Context.STDJ78.Leiden:Brill.

Brack-BernsenL.andJ.M.Steele.2004.“BabylonianMathemagics:TwoAstronomical-

AstrologicalTexts.”Pages95-121inC.Burnett,etal.,eds.StudiesintheHistoryoftheExact

SciencesinHonourofDavidPingree.Leiden:Brill.

Page 15: Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact · Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology

15

Brack-Bernsen,L.2007.“The360-DayYearinMesopotamia.”Pages83–100inJ.M.Steele,

ed.CalendarsandYears:AstronomyandTimeintheAncientNearEast.Oxford:Oxbow

Books.

Britton,J.P.2007.“Calendars,IntercalationsandYear-LengthsinMesopotamian

Astronomy.”Pages115–131inJ.M.Steele,ed.CalendarsandYears:AstronomyandTimein

theAncientNearEast.Oxford:OxbowBooks.

Brown,D.2000.MesopotamianPlanetaryAstronomy-Astrology.Groningen:Styx.

Drawnel,H.2011.TheAramaicAstronomicalBook(4Q208–4Q211)fromQumran:Text,

Translation,andCommentary.Oxford:Clarendon.

Duke,DandM.Goff.2014.“TheAstronomyoftheQumranFragmentsof4Q208and

4Q209,”DeadSeaDiscoveries21:176–210.

Ehro,T.M,andLT.Stuckenbruck.2013.“AManuscriptHistoryofEthiopicEnoch,”Journal

fortheStudyofthePseudepigrapha23:87–133.

Greenfield,J.C.andM.Sokoloff,2000.“318.4QZodiologyandBrontologyar.”Pages259–

274,pls.15-16(Yardeni,A.“Paleography.”Pages259–260,pl.16andPingree,D.

“AstronomicalAspects.”Pages270–273)inJ.VanderKamwithM.Brady,consultingeditors,

QumranCave4.26CrypticTextsandMiscellanea,Part1;DiscoveriesintheJudeanDesert

36;Oxford:Clarendon.

Hannah,R.2005.GreekandRomanCalendars:ConstructionsofTimeintheClassicalWorld.

London:Duckworth.

Heeßel,N.2010.“TheCalculationoftheStipulatedTerminExtispicy.”Pages163–175inA.

Annus,ed.DivinationandInterpretationofSignsintheAncientWorld.OIS6.Chicago:

UniversityofChicago.

Page 16: Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact · Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology

16

Jull,A.J.T.etal.,1995.“RadiocarbonDatingofScrollsandLinenFragmentsfromtheJudaean

Desert.”Radiocarbon37:11–19.

Knibb,M.A.1978.TheEthiopicBookofEnoch:ANewEditionintheLightoftheAramaic

DeadSeaFragments.InConsultationwithEdwardUllendorff.2vols.Oxford:Clarendon

Press.

Jacobus,H.R.2010.“4Q318:AJewishZodiacCalendaratQumran?”Pages365–395inC.

Hempel,ed.TheDeadSeaScrollsTextsandContext.Leiden:Brill.

Jacobus,H.R.2011.“4Q318ZodiacCalendarandBrontologionReconsideredandits

ImplicationsfortheAramaicAstronomicalBookofEnochandaLateMedievalText.”Ph.D.

diss.,UniversityofManchester.

Jacobus,H.R.2014a.ZodiacCalendarsintheDeadSeaScrollsandtheirReception:Ancient

AstronomyandAstrologyinEarlyJudaism;IJS14.Leiden:Brill.

JacobusH.R.2014b.“Greco-RomanZodiacSundialsandTheirLinkstoaQumranCalendar

(4Q208–4Q209).”MediterraneanArchaeologyandArchaeometry.14:67–81.

Jacobus,H.forthcoming.“AstralDivinationintheDeadSeaScrolls,”inA.C.BowenandF.

Rochberg,eds.HellenisticAstronomy:TheScienceinItsContext(Leiden:Brill).

Laurence,R.1821.TheBookofEnochtheProphet:AnApocryphalproduction,butsupposed

tohavebeenlostforages,butdiscoveredatthecloseofthelastcenturyinAbyssinia,now

firsttranslatedfromanEthiopicMs.IntheBodleianLibrary.(Oxford:OxfordUniversity

Press).

Milik,J.T.1976.TheBooksofEnoch:AramaicFragmentsofQumrânCave4.Oxford:

Clarendon.

Neugebauer,O.1975.AHistoryofAncientMathematicalAstronomy[HAMA].3vols.(Berlin:

Springer:Verlag).Pages:354-357.

Page 17: Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact · Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology

17

Neugebauer,O.1979.EthiopicComputusandAstronomy.Vienna:Verlagder

ÖsterreichischenAkademiederWissenschaften.

Neugebauer,O.1981.The‘Astronomical’ChaptersoftheEthiopicBookofEnoch(72–82):

TranslationandCommentary,withadditionalnotesontheAramaicfragmentsbyMatthew

Black.DetKongeligeDanskeVidenskaberneSelskab,Matematisk-fysiskeMeddelser40.10.

Copenhagen:Munksgaard.

Nickelsburg,G.W.E.andJ.C.VanderKam,2004.1Enoch.Minneapolis,MN:FortressPress.

Nickelsburg,G.W.E.andJ.C.VanderKam,2012.1Enoch2.Hermeneia.Minneapolis,MN:

FortressPress.

Oppenheim,A.L.1974.“ABabylonianDiviner’sManual.”JournalofNearEasternStudies32:

197–220.

Pritchett,W.K.andO.Neugebauer.1947.TheCalendarsofAthens.Cambridge,MA:Harvard

UniversityPress.

Ratzon,E.2015.“TheGatesCosmologyoftheAstronomicalBookofEnoch,”DeadSea

Discoveries22:93-111.

Ratzon,E.2017.“TheFirstJewishAstronomers:LunarTheoryandReconstructionofaDead

SeaScroll.”ScienceinContext30:113-139.

Rochberg,F.1992.“Calendars:AncientNearEast.”1:810-814inTheAnchorBible

Dictionary,ed.D.N.Freedman.6vols.(NewYork:Doubleday).

Rochberg,F.1995.“AstronomyandCalendarsinAncientMesopotamia.”Pages1925–1940

inJ.M.Sasson,ed.CivilisationsoftheAncientNearEast.Vol3.4vols.NewYork:Schreibner.

Rochberg,F.1998.BabylonianHoroscopes.TAPS88;Philadelphia,PA:American

PhilosophicalSociety.

Page 18: Reconstructing 4Q208–4Q209 as an Astronomical Artefact · Expansion of Helen R. Jacobus, Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient Astronomy and Astrology

18

Williams,C.2002.“SignsfromtheSky,SignsfromtheEarth:TheDiviner’sManual

Revisited.”Pages295–314inJ.M.SteeleandA.Imhausen,eds.UnderOneSky:Astronomy

andMathematicsintheAncientNearEast.Münster:Ugarit-Verlag.

Wise,M.O.1994.“ThunderinGemini:AnAramaicBrontologion(4Q318)fromQumran.”

Pages13–50inThunderinGeminiAndOtherEssaysintheHistory,LanguageandLiterature

ofSecondTemplePalestine.JournalfortheStudyofthePseudepigraphaSupplementSeries

15.Sheffield:SheffieldAcademicPress.