Recorded and Docketed 14-02259 Lambert Habeus MOTION to Recuse Judge Paul Diamond November 29, 2015 Docketed on December 7, 2015 (Small)

CLOSED,APPEAL,HABEAS,A/R,DOC-RESTRICT

United States District Court

Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Allentown)

CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:14-cv-02559-PD

LAMBERT v. BISSONETTE et al

Assigned to: HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND

Case in other court: THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, 15-03400

Cause: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Date Filed: 05/02/2014

Date Terminated: 05/22/2014

Jury Demand: None

Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus: (General)

Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Petitioner

LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT represented by JEREMY H.G. IBRAHIM

LAW OFFICES OF JEREMY H. GONZALEZ IBRAHIM

P.O. BOX 1025

CHADDS FORD, PA 19317

215-568-1943

Email: [email protected]

LEAD ATTORNEY

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V.

Respondent

LYNN BISSONETTE

SUPERINTENDENT, MCI-FRAMINGHAM

Respondent

THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY,

PENNSYLVANIA

Respondent

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA

V.

Movant

STANLEY J. CATERBONE

AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE

1250 FREMONT STREET

LANCASTER, PA 17603

717-669-2163

Email: [email protected]

PRO SE

Date Filed # Docket Text

05/02/2014 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 100526.), filed by LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT. (Attachments: # 1 Civil

Cover Sheet)(ks, ) (Entered: 05/05/2014)

05/22/2014 2 CJA 20 APPIONTMENT OF ATTORNEY JEREMY H.G. IBRAHIM for LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S.

DIAMOND ON 5/22/14. 5/22/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jpd) (Entered: 05/22/2014)

05/22/2014 3 ORDER THAT JEREMY IBRAHIM, ESQ., IS APPOINTED AS PETITIONER'S COUNSEL. ACCORDINGLY HER HABEAS PETITION IS

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A COUNSELED MOTION FOR RELIEF. COUNSEL SHOULD BE

PREPARED TO ADDRESS WHETHER PETITIONER MUST SEEK PERMISSION FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS BEFORE FILING A SECOND

OR SUCCESSIVE HABEAS PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 5/22/14. 5/23/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED

TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd) (Entered: 05/23/2014)

06/23/2015 4 BRIEF ON BEHALF OF AMICI CURIAE STANLEY J. CANTERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP IN SUPPORT OF LISA MICHELLE

LAMBERT'S HABEAU CORPUS, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(jpd) (Entered: 06/25/2015)

07/06/2015 5 STATEMENT OF MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE. (jpd, ) (Entered: 07/07/2015)

08/14/2015 6 LETTER FROM STAN J. CATERBONE DATED 8/7/15 ADDRESSED TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE J. CURTIS JOYNER AND THE

HONORABLE JUDGE PAUL S. DIAMOND RE: ELECTRONIC CASE FILING PRIVILEGES. (jpd) (Entered: 08/14/2015)

09/02/2015 8 MOTION TO FILE SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. (ems) (Entered: 09/03/2015)

09/03/2015 7 ORDER THAT MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE DOCUMENTS (DOC. NO. 6)

IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 9/3/2015. 9/3/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED; AND MAILED TO PRO

SE. (ems) (Entered: 09/03/2015)

09/03/2015 9 MOTION TO FILE SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.(jaa, ) Modified on 9/3/2015 (afm, ). Modified on 9/4/2015 (jaa, ).

(Entered: 09/03/2015)

09/03/2015 10 MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF MOVANT filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. (ems) (Entered: 09/04/2015)

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?735197255373405-L_1_0-1

1 of 2 12/7/2015 9:28 PM

09/09/2015 11 MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION TO FILE EXHIBT. (jpd, ) (Entered: 09/10/2015)

09/09/2015 12 MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF MOVANT.(jpd, ) (Entered: 09/10/2015)

09/09/2015 13 LETTER APPLICATION FROM TIMOTHY RICE #DU-2363 ADDRESSED TO THE HONORALE TIMOTHY R. RICE, UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE (jpd) (DOCKETED IN ERROR SEE 15-CV-291). (Entered: 09/10/2015)

09/09/2015 14 MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT OF MOVANT. (jpd, ) (Entered: 09/10/2015)

09/14/2015 15 ORDER THAT MR. CATERBONE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 8 AND 9) AND MOTIONS TO FILE EXHIBITS OR

STATEMENTS (DOC. NO. 10, 11, 12, 14) ARE DENIED AS FRIVOLOUS. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT STANLEY J. CATERBONE MAY NO

LONGER SUBMIT FILINGS-WHETHER ELECTRONIC OR IN PAPER FORMAT IN THE ABOVE CAPTIONED MATTER. THE CLERK OF

COURT SHALL NOT DOCKET ANY SUCH FILINGS WITHOUT MY APPROVAL. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 9/11/15.

9/14/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE MOVANT AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL. (jpd) (Entered: 09/14/2015)

09/30/2015 16 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 15 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,, Order on Motion for Order, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on

Motion for Leave to File by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. IFP PENDING Copies to Judge, Clerk USCA, Appeals Clerk.(jpd) (Entered: 10/02/2015)

10/01/2015 17 Clerk's Notice to USCA re 16 Notice of Appeal, : (jpd, ) (Entered: 10/02/2015)

10/01/2015 18 MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (jpd) (Entered:

10/02/2015)

10/09/2015 NOTICE of Docketing Record on Appeal from USCA re 16 Notice of Appeal, filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. USCA Case Number 15-3400 (jpd, )

(Entered: 10/09/2015)

10/21/2015 19 ORDER THAT MR. CATERBONE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. 18) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY

HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 10/21/15. 10/21/15 ENTERED AND COPIES TO USCA, MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND

E-MAILED. (jpd) Modified on 10/28/2015 (tjd). (Entered: 10/21/2015)

10/30/2015 20 EX PARTE ORDER FILED UNDER SEAL. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 10/30/15. 11/2/15 ENTERED AND COPIES

MAILED TO COUNSEL. (jpd) (Entered: 11/02/2015)

12/07/2015 21 MOVANT STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE PAUL DIAMOND. (jpd) (Entered: 12/07/2015)

PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt

12/07/2015 21:27:19

PACER Login: am6446:3514696:0 Client Code:

Description: Docket Report Search Criteria: 5:14-cv-02559-PD

Billable Pages: 2 Cost: 0.20

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?735197255373405-L_1_0-1

2 of 2 12/7/2015 9:28 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLNAIA

__________________________________________________________________________

LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT,

Petitioner

v.

LYNN BISSONETTE, SUPERINTENDENT,

MCI-FRAMINGHAM,

and

CRAIG STEDMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF

LANCASTER

COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

and

KATHLEEN KANE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondents

v.

STANLEY J. CATERBONE

Movant

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: Civ. No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD

:

: U.S.C.A. 15-3400

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE PAUL DIAMOND

TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF THE SAID COURT:

AND NOW comes before the said court Stanley J. Caterbone, appearing Pro Se, and Ad-

vanced Media Group, as Movant, to file the following MOTION for Recusal.

I, Stanley J. Caterbone, Appellant, do hereby request the Honorable PAUL J. DIAMOND, U.S.

District Court Judge disqualify himself from the above cases due to a conflict of interest, which his

impartiality might reasonably be questioned. This same bias can be evidenced in the fact that

Jeremy H.G. Ibrahim, Sr., Esq, the Court Appointed Counsel for the PETITIONER Lisa Michelle Lam-

bert sent an email to the Movant threatening prosecution for emails that were in fact advocating for

the successful resolution to this case, that is the release from further incarceration for the PETI-

TIONER, Lisa Michelle Lambert. It looks as though the objective of dismissing the PETITIONER'S

Habeus Corpus in the very same ORDER appointing Jeremy H.G. Ibrahim, Sr., Esq as counsel was

to accomplish just that, dismiss the PETITIONER'S HABEUS CORPUS without any adjudication or ju-

dicial review. The MOVANT does not relish this MOTION and hopes that Your Honor has a reason-

able explanation and can defend this MOTION and prove the MOVANT wrong.

14-02559 Lambert Habeus Corpus Page 1 of 120 Sunday, November 29, 2015

That very same bias is demonstrated in the ORDER of September 14,, 2015. The Appellant

Stanley J. Caterbone’s Federal False Claims Act litigation concerning International Signal & Control,

Plc., also includes agencies within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, including the Pennsylvania

Attorney General’s Office and the Pennsylvania Securities Commission, as material to the litigation.

On June 23, 2015, the AFFIANT, was listed on the Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus

Corpus Case, No. 14-2559, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Penn-

sylvania, as the MOVANT, as depicted in the caption as stated “v. Movant, STANLEY J.

CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO

SE, 1250 FREMONT STREET LANCASTER, PA 17603”. See Attached.

On or about the week of June 29, 2015 the AFFIANT did in fact communicate with Mr.

Jeremy H.G. Ibrahim, Sr., Esq, appointed counsel on May 22, 2014, via a telephone conversation in

which Mr. Ibrahim stated “ I am very busy and will be in court in Delaware this week and will be in

touch with you later”.

On July 9, 2015 the AFFIANT, did receive an email from Mr. Jeremy H.G. Ibrahim,

Sr., Esq, the appointed counsel as of the May 22, 2014, for Petitioner Lisa Michelle Lam-

bert, U.S. District Court Case No. 14-2559, stated the following:

“Kindly remove my email address. Your emails are harassing and causing distress. This a

cease and desist notice. I refer you to 18 USC 2261 and PA Code:

http://www.legis.state . pa.us/WU01/LI/LI/CT/HTM/18/00.027.009.000..HTM I will file a police r

eport shortly in my township. Jeremy H. Gonzalez Ibrahim, Esq. USNA Blue & Gold Officer”.

See Attached.

As filed and recorded in the ORDER of September 14, 2015 Judge Paul Diamond de-

clared the following:

“I previously dismissed Petitioner’s pro se motion for habeas relief so that she could file a

counseled motion. (Doc. No. 3.) She has not yet done so. On June 23, 2015, Stanley

Caterbone—who has nothing to do with Petitioner, her motion, or this case— filed a pro se

amicus brief in support of the dismissed motion. (Doc. No. 4.) Caterbone neither sought

leave to file, nor indicated that he had received the Parties’ consent to file an amicus brief.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 29(a) The amicus brief—although providing some arguments in apparent

support of the dismissed motion—essentially focuses on the damages Caterbone allegedly

suffered from “his years of torture as a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control” or as a “vic

tim of gang-stalking or organized stalking by more than 100 people.” (Doc. No. 4 at 7, 9).

He also in includes a lengthy discussion of the “perplexing question of Stan Caterbone’s in


telligence, or lack thereof,” and his work on a “digital movie” that is “directly responsible for

the development of the ‘internet.’” (Id. at 16-26). In addition, he details thirty governmental

attempts at “mind control,” including: 1) “Blanketing my dwelling and surroundings with

electromagnetic energy”; 2)“Invading my thoughts via remote sensing technologies”; and

3) “Making me mentally ‘hear’ others’ voices through the microwave hearing effect.” (Id. at

27-30.) Caterbone’s involvement in the matter did not end with his amicus brief. On July 6,

2015, he filed with this Court an email that he had sent to the Lancaster Police, asserting

that he has “synthetic telepathy.” (Doc. No. 5.) On September 2 and 3, 2015, Caterbone

moved for “summary judgment.” (Doc. Nos. 8, 9.) On September 3, 2015, he moved to file

a copy of his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his petition to proceed in forma

pauperis in Pennsylvania state court, (which had been “dismissed as frivolous”). (Doc. No.

10.) On September 9, 2015, he also moved to file: 1) an email exchange with the subject

“Muslims Us ing My Situation to Fight Against the USA”; 2) a Wikipedia article on “Entrap

ment”; and 3) an exhibit of billing statements of his estimated fees for his 2007 work on

wholly unrelated federal and state court cases. (Doc. Nos. 11, 12, 14.) On September 9,

2015, Caterbone called my Chambers, demanding to speak with me, and then abruptly

hung up. I have already denied Caterbone’s request to file documents electronically. (Doc.

No. 9.) He has nonetheless continued to submit filings that have nothing to do with this

case. “. See Attached.

The above ORDER and declarations by Judge Paul Diamond fail to mention the fact that the

declarations made by the AFFIANT, in his amicus, were for the sole purpose of providing to the

Court as much factual information and background information as possible with regards to the AF-

FIANT's legal odyssey in the federal court system since filing Case No. 05-2288 on May 16, 2005.

The AFFIANT has submitted volumes of evidence surrounding the massive efforts of Judges, Prose-

cutors, Friends, Relatives, Professional Colleagues, the Media, and Law Enforcement to discredit

the AFFIANT since the June 23, 1987 meeting with ISC Executive Larry Resch. In addition with re-

gards to the subject of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, the AFFIANT has been collecting Social Secu-

rity Disability Benefits since April of 2008 for symptoms and illnesses related to the same. The So-

cial Security Administration, in it's award letter of August of 2009, declared the AFFIANT mentally

disabled as of December of 2005, the time in which the AFFIANT declared under oath of law, as to

the time when the AFFIANT become a victim of full-time, 24/7 synthetic telepathy. The AFFIANT

can prove the preceding by virtue of the fact that there wasno medical reports from any doctors or

psychiatric professionals submitted during the applica tion for benefits process, and the Social

Security Administration refused to grant the AFFIANT a psychiatric evaluation. Also, the AFFIANT

filed a Motion for a Hearing on October 26, 2015 to provide this Court with expert testimony prov-

ing the same.


Clearly Judge Paul Diamond has continued that effort, demonstrated by his lack of attention to

the arguments made in the AFFIANT's amicus as to the merits and legal standing of the AFFIANT

with regards to the question of being the MOVANT in this case.

There is some indication that both Judge Paul Diamond and Mr. Jeremy H.G. Ibrahim, Sr., Esq,

are colluding to discredit the AFFIANT, Stanley J. Caterbone, and possibly derail the PETITIONER,

Lisa Michelle Lambert's efforts at relief and release from incarceration as stated in her pro se

Habeus Corpus of May 2, 2014. There seems to be no reasonable explanation at the lack of move-

ment in the case from May, of 2014 until the day of June 23, 2015, some 14 months later, when

the AFFIANT, Stanley J. Caterbone, was listed as the “MOVANT”. This theory was first considered

back in June of 2015 by the AFFIANT, Stanley J. Caterbone.

/S/ Stanley J. Caterbone

Date: November 29, 2015 Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se, Movant

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603

717-669-2163

[email protected]

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com


U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of PennsylvaniaCase No. 14-02559, Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus Corpus

Order Appealed: Motion for Judge Diamond to Recuse Himself

MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE PAUL DIAMOND

November 29, 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. 15-3400 Lambert Appeal in U.S.C.A. Nov 28 MOTION for the Recusal of

Judge Paul Diamond

2. LAMBERT Docket Amicus Filed in Federal Court June 23, 2015

3. July 9, 2015 - Jeremy H Gonzalez Ibrahim Email Cease Desist

4. Sep 15, 2015 United States District Court Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus

ORDER Summary Judgment DENIED Case No 5-14-cv-02559-PD

5. May 22, 2014 - Lambert ORDER Dismiss for Appellate Jurisdiction

6. EXHIBITS

7. Third Circuit 15-3400 Lambert Appeal Docket With Summaries of ALL

Recorded Filings as of November 29, 2015

8. Advanced Media Group Press Released re Proposed Organized Stalking Bill

9. Notarized Affidavits for Press Release and Executive Summary of

November 28, 2015

10. Proposed Organized Stalking Bill

11. May 2015 Richmond California City Ordinance to Ban Space Based

Weapons and Weapons of Mind Control

12. Cover Page for Executive Summary

13. Executive Summary

14. Updates for Executive Summary October 10, 2015

15. History of Federal Whistleblowing Case and Targeted Individual

16. The Courts and the United States Legal System

17. Family History

18. The Public Record

19. Is Lancaster County Ground Zero for U.S. Sponsored Mind Control

20. Affidavit of Joinment of October 10, 2015


21. 29 FALSE ARRESTS RECORD Since 1987

22. 21 ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES

23. Stan Caterbone's Notarized Affidavit for FFCHS September 16, 2010

Redacted Version

24. Stan Caterbone's Detailed Victimization Affidavit of 2010

25. Samuel P Caterbone US Sponsored Mind Control Affidavit 1996

26. Sammy A. Caterbone Affidavit of US Sponsored Mind Control 1991

27. Letter to Kathleen Kane re "Old Boys Network" of November 12,

2015 Hand Delivered to Agent Tyson of PA Attorney General Office

28. Letter from Kathleen Kane of November 13, 2015

29. No Trespass Notice from Tobias Frog of August 15, 2015

30. Praecipe of CATERBONE v. Duke Street Business Center et.al., with

Named Defendants Tobias Frog and Owners of August 31, 2015










EXHIBITS


General Docket

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals Docket #: 15-3400 Docketed: 10/08/2015Nature of Suit: 3530 Habeas CorpusLisa Lambert v. Superintendent Framingham MCI, et alAppeal From: United States District Court for the Eastern District of PennsylvaniaFee Status: Due

Case Type Information:

1) civil 2) private 3) Habeas Corpus-prisoner

Originating Court Information:

District: 0313-2 : 5-14-cv-02559Court Reporter: Joan CarrTrial Judge: Paul S. Diamond, U.S. District Judge

Date Filed: 05/02/2014 Date Order/Judgment: Date Order/Judgment EOD: Date NOA Filed:

09/14/2015 09/14/2015 09/30/2015

Prior Cases:

None

Current Cases:

None

LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT Plaintiff - Appellee

Jeremy H.G. Ibrahim, Sr., Esq.Direct: 215-568-1943Email: [email protected]: 610-456-2727[NTC Retained]P.O. Box 10251631 Baltimore PikeChadds Ford, PA 19317

v.

SUPERINTENDENT FRAMINGHAM MCI Defendant - Appellee

District Attorney Lancaster County[NTC city/county gov]Lancaster County Office of District Attorney50 North Duke StreetLancaster, PA 17608

DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY Defendant - Appellee

District Attorney Lancaster County[NTC city/county gov](see above)

ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA Defendant - Appellee

District Attorney Lancaster County[NTC city/county gov](see above)

------------------------------

STANLEY J. CATERBONE Not Party - Appellant

Stanley J. CaterboneDirect: 717-669-2163Email: [email protected][NTC Pro Se]1250 Fremont StreetLancaster, PA 17603

15-3400 Docket https://ecf.ca3.uscourts.gov/cmecf/servlet/TransportRoom

1 of 5 11/29/2015 10:38 AM


LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT

v.

SUPERINTENDENT FRAMINGHAM MCI;DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY;ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA

*Stanley J. Caterbone, Appellant

*(Pursuant to Rule 12(a), Fed.R.App.P.)


2 of 5 11/29/2015 10:38 AM


10/08/2015

30 pg, 3.25 MB

CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone in District Court No. 5-14-cv-02559. [-The notice of appeal that was attached to the entry was the incorrect document. The notice ofappeal has been corrected and notice is being resent.]--[Edited 10/09/2015 by CJG] (SB)

10/08/2015 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SB)

10/09/2015

2 pg, 27.26 KB

LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for adecision on the issuance of certificate of appealability and possible summary action. (JW)

10/21/2015

42 pg, 4.58 MB

ECF FILER: EXHIBITS filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone for the Court's consideration. Certificateof Service dated 10/21/2015.--[Edited 10/22/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

10/21/2015

0 pg, 0 KB

ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificateof Service dated 10/21/2015. (SJC)

10/22/2015

312 pg, 15.13 MB

ECF FILER: EXHIBITS filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone for the Court's consideration. Certificateof Service dated 10/22/2015.--[Edited 10/22/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

10/22/2015

1 pg, 28.36 KB

COPY OF ORDER OF DISTRICT COURT dated 10/21/2015 denying Mr. Caterbone's motion to proceed informa pauperis signed by Paul S. Diamond, filed. (CJG)

10/23/2015

44 pg, 4.6 MB

ECF FILER: DOCUMENT by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone titled Submission as Exhibit. Certificate ofService dated 10/23/2015.--[Edited 10/23/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

10/26/2015

194 pg, 22.28 MB

ECF FILER: Request by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone for Oral Argument. [SEND TO MERITS] (SJC)

10/27/2015

2 pg, 21.62 KB

FOLLOW UP LETTER to District Attorney Lancaster County for Attorney General Pennsylvania,Superintendent Framingham MCI and District Attorney Lancaster County and Jeremy H.G. Ibrahim, Sr.,Esq. for Lisa Michelle Lambert requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before11/10/2015. (CJG)

11/02/2015

227 pg, 29.4 MB

ECF FILER: DOCUMENT filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone titled Submission as Exhibit.Certificate of Service dated 11/02/2015.--[Edited 11/02/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

11/03/2015

8 pg, 1.94 MB

ORDER (Clerk) The motion proceed in forma pauperis is held in abeyance pending the submission of anadditional document. Appellant must submit this Court's affidavit of poverty within 14 days of the date ofthis order or the appeal may be dismissed, filed. (CJG)

11/03/2015

462 pg, 53.19 MB

ECF FILER: DOCUMENTS by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone titled Submissions as Exhibits.Certificate of Service dated 11/03/2015.--[Edited 11/03/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

11/04/2015

528 pg, 20.01 MB


11/04/2015

0 pg, 0 KB

ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificateof Service dated 11/04/2015. (SJC)

11/06/2015

6 pg, 134.36 KB

ECF FILER: ARGUMENT In Response to Summary Action from Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone, filed.Certificate of Service dated 11/06/2015 by ECF.--[Edited 11/06/2015 by MLR] (SJC)

11/06/2015

174 pg, 33.18 MB

ECF FILER: DOCUMENT by Appellant Stanley J. Caterbone titled Submission as Exhibit. Certificate ofService dated 11/06/2015.--[Edited 11/10/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

11/07/2015

45 pg, 312.16 KB

ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone Consideration for fees in the amount of$284,702.50. Certificate of Service dated 11/07/2015.--[Edited 11/10/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

11/09/2015

2 pg, 46.85 KB

ECF FILER: DOCUMENT filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone titled Submission as Exhibit "AudioFile of Authentic Recordings of 1987 and 1991". Certificate of Service dated 11/09/2015.--[Edited11/10/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

11/10/2015

102 pg, 4.75 MB


11/10/2015

91 pg, 21.28 MB


11/13/2015

1 pg, 6.04 KB

ORDER (Clerk) The Motion Proceed In Forma Pauperis is referred to a motions panel, filed. (CJG)

11/13/2015

185 pg, 19.73 MB


11/16/2015

91 pg, 37.06 MB


11/17/2015

1585 pg, 37.55 MB

ECF FILER: 3DOCUMENT filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone titled submission as exhibit.Certificate of Service dated 11/17/2015.--[Edited 11/19/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

11/18/2015

807 pg, 79 MB



3 of 5 11/29/2015 10:38 AM


11/19/2015

232 pg, 10.74 MB


11/20/2015

232 pg, 9.11 MB


11/21/2015

69 pg, 17 MB


11/22/2015

275 pg, 20.95 MB


11/22/2015

3 pg, 1.86 MB

ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone for 30 Day Continuance. Certificate ofService dated 11/22/2015.--[Edited 11/23/2015 by CJG] (SJC)

11/24/2015

1 pg, 71.71 KB

ORDER (Clerk) The motion for continuance is granted to the extent it can be construed as a motion forextension of time to file a response regarding possible summary action. Appellant's response must be filedand served within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, filed. (CJG)

11/25/2015

783 pg, 35.13 MB


11/27/2015

128 pg, 16.12 MB

ECF FILER: 3rd Circuit EXHIBIT re Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan for Case No. 05-23059 Filed January12, 2010, November 27, 2015 filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone. Certificate of Service dated11/27/2015. (SJC)

11/28/2015

94 pg, 10.13 MB

ECF FILER: 3rd Circuit Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT re Affidavit of APPELLANT Stanley J. Caterbone reJudge Diamond Misconduct, November 28, 2015 filed by Appellant Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone. Certificate ofService dated 11/28/2015. (SJC)


4 of 5 11/29/2015 10:38 AM


OFFICE OF THE CLERK

MARCIA M. WALDRON UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TELEPHONE

CLERK FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 215-597-2995 21400 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE

601 MARKET STREET PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-1790

Website: www.ca3.uscourts.gov

October 9, 2015 Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone 1250 Fremont Street Lancaster, PA 17603 RE: Lisa Lambert v. Superintendent Framingham MCI, et al.

Case Number: 15-3400

District Case Number: 5-14-cv-02559 _________________________________________________ Dear Mr. Caterbone:

This appeal has been listed for possible summary action by a panel of this Court, pursuant to Chapter 10.6 of the Internal operating Procedures of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. See also Third Circuit Local Appellate Rule(3rd Cir. LAR) 27.4 Chapter 10.6 provides that the Court sua sponte (by its own action) may take summary action on an appeal if it appears that no substantial question is presented or that subsequent precedent or a change in circumstances warrants such action. Specifically, the Court may affirm, reverse, vacate, modify, or remand the judgment or order appealed. The parties may submit written argument supporting or opposing summary action.

The panel of this court that considers possible summary action also will consider whether a certificate of appealability is required for the purpose of this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. Section 2253. If the Court determines that a certificate of appealability is required, appellant's notice of appeal will be deemed to be such an application, unless appellant has submitted a formal application for a certificate of appealability. See 3rd Cir. LAR 22.1.

Any response regarding summary action or issuance of a certificate of appealability must be received in the Clerk's Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. Please submit to the Clerk and original copy of any response, and a certificate of service indicating that all parties have been served with a copy of the response. The Court will carefully review the District Court record, along with any written submissions received from the parties.

Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112098354 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/09/2015


October 9, 2015 Page 2 _________________

Issuance of the briefing schedule will be stayed pending action by the Court. If the Court declines to take summary action or grants the application for a certificate of appealability, the Clerk will issue a briefing schedule. The parties will be advised of any order issued in this matter.

Very truly yours, Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

By: Jo-Ann Williams, Administrative Assistant cc: Jeremy H.G. Ibrahim, Sr., Esq. District Attorney Lancaster County




s [email protected]

Stanley J. Caterbone

Advanced Media Group1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603

IN THE UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

_______________________________________________________________________________Lisa Michelle Lambert :

PETITIONER : :

v. : CASE NO. 3400-2015:

Lynn Bissonnette, et al., : RESPONDANT :

:Stanley J. Caterbone :

APPELLANT :

SUBMISSION AS EXHIBIT BY APPELANT“Affidavit of AFFIANT Stanley J. Caterbone re Judge Diamond Misconduct, November 28,

2015 ”

I hereby on this 28h day of November, 2015, submit for considerations in the above

captioned case the attached document as an EXHIBIT to be considered by the court in the

deliberations of this case. This exhibit, like the previous EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court

understand the complexity of the APPELLANT'S obligation to provide the Court with the evidence

and insight to support the APPELLANT'S claims and statements. These documents will also provide

the Court with sufficient knowledge of the APPELLANT'S claim of the value of the

Appellant's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S. Bankruptcy Case No. 05-

23059. The APPELLANT does not intend to overburden the Court with unnecessary filings, however

this burden of supporting the claims and statements falls on the shoulders of all those in the

government that ignored the APPELLANT'S pleas for help to resolve these issues dating back to the

days immediately following the meeting with International Signal & Control, Plc., (ISC) Executive

Larry Resch on June 23, 1987.

/s/ Stanley J. Caterbone

Date: November 28, 2015 Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Appellant1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603(717)-669-2163

s [email protected] http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/__


http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/

mailto:[email protected]




s [email protected]



Lancaster, PA 17603



PETITIONER : :

v. : CASE NO. 3400-2015:

:

Lynn Bissonnette, et al., :

RESPONDANT ::

Stanley J. Caterbone : APPELLANT :

:

SUBMISSION AS EXHIBIT BY APPELANT“Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan for Case No. 05-23059 Filed January 12, 2010,

November 27, 2015 ”

I hereby on this 27h day of November, 2015, submit for considerations in the above

captioned case the attached document as an EXHIBIT to be considered by the court in the

deliberations of this case. This exhibit, like the previous EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court

understand the complexity of the APPELLANT'S obligation to provide the Court with the evidence

and insight to support the APPELLANT'S claims and statements. These documents will also provide

the Court with sufficient knowledge of the APPELLANT'S claim of the value of the

Appellant's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S. Bankruptcy Case No. 05-

23059. The following EXHIBIT titled “ Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan for Case No. 05-23059 Filed

January 12, 2010, November 27, 2015” was not completed when it was filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy

Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

After careful review the APPELLANT has since recovered documentation and evidence that

can substantiate that the $50,000,000 valuation on the APPELLANT'S litigation is a low estimate.

For example, in the “Original and Authentic Documentation of 1987” the Court will see a document

called the HARSCO Pension Plan Proposal of $144,000,000. HARSCO was a Harrisburg based

corporation. In 1987 Michael Dipaolo was an auditor for KPMG Maine Hurdman, a Big Eight

accounting firm. He was also a personal friend of the APPELLANT whose wife, Mary Lynn, was hired




as an executive assistant at Financial Management Group, Ltd., Mike Dipaolo referred the pension

plan to the APPELLANT in order to bid on the management of that pension plan. The Court will see

the bidding documents from several management firms that were requested to provide disclosures

to the APPELLANT in order to secure the management of the pension plan. That project alone would

have generated some $900,000 in management fees to the APPELLANT on an annual basis, of which

the APPELLANT had a fee sharing agreement with Mike Dipaolo that would have generated at least

$250,000 per year in annual income. The following outlines income and equity owned and claimed

by the APPELLANT, not by Financial Management Group, Ltd., The APPELLANT had an agreement

for sharing approximately 10% back into the firm of Financial Management Group, Ltd., which was

negotiated by Robert Kauffman and the APPELLANT.

In the July of 1987, after the meeting with ISC executive Larry Resch of June 23, the

APPELLANT and Tony Bongiovi had a meeting on the Wildwood Boardwalk, namely the portion that

Tony Bongiovi owned. The APPELLANT was already named in the operating budget of the movie to

receive $200,000, not including the Managing Limited Partner Fee of the investors, as outlined in

the original documents which the Court can confirm. On that night, Tony Bongiovi had made a

verbal disclosure to the APPELLANT that he wanted the APPELLANT to manage the business affairs

of every project that Tony was then involved in and promised that the APPELLANT would share in

the profits of every said project. In addition to the “Digital Movie”, Tony was involved in a number

of other projects including but not limited to the pier of Wildwood in which Tony wanted to open an

open-air concert venue, similar to that of the Steel Pier in Atlantic City. Tony also had a project in

which he was recreating the flight of Amelia Earhart; the recording artists and band that was

secured and under management for the past year or so called “French Lick”; the comic act of the

“Wid”; the video editing suite at power station built by engineer Ed Evans; and of course the

recording studio itself Power Station Studios, now operating as Avatar Studios of New York. The

APPELLANT can only guesstimate that those revenues and future revenues would be worth almost

the full $50,000,000 today had many of those projects been successful. The Court is reminded at

the track record and resume of both the APPELLANT and Tony Bongiovi.

On March 2nd of 1987 the Court will see a document from real estate developer Owen Kugal

that outlines the fees to the APPELLANT for the securing of financing his real estate portfolio, that

fee is stated at $433,592. The APPELLANT had also secured financing for Noris Boyd, of Boyd

Wilson and owner of the Olde Hickory property on the Oregon Pike. The financing package was for

a refinance agreement of $5,000,000.000 which would have generated at least a $75,000.00 fee for

the APPELLANT.

In May of 1987, the APPELLANT and attorney Randy Grespin, of Life Underwriters of

Harrisburg (Owned and Operated by Tony Pascotti and representing Tony Pascotti) flew in the

APPELLANT'S plane to Atlanta for a scheduled meeting with Bill Koegler of the Planners Securities


Group, a regional Broxer Dealer. The APPELLANT had negotiated a merger of Financial Management

Group, Ltd., and Planners Securities Group which contained a clause granting Financial Management

Group, Ltd., a 10% ownership position, which was worth approximately $1,800,000. The deal was

consummated by a vote of the FMG Board of Directors in May of 1987. The Court will see a

document titled “Financial Analysis” of FMG in June of 1987 which values the shares of FMG at

approximately $17.00. The APPELLANT at that time owned some 50,000 shares, which puts a fair

market value of approximately $850,000.00 in his FMG stock holdings.

The real estate holding of the APPELLANT is outlined in the “Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan”,

the EXHBIT.

The APPELLANT does not intend to overburden the Court with unnecessary filings, however

this burden of supporting the claims and statements falls on the shoulders of all those in the

government that ignored the APPELLANT'S pleas for help to resolve these issues dating back to the

days immediately following the meeting with International Signal & Control, Plc., (ISC) Executive

Larry Resch on June 23, 1987.


Date: November 27, 2015 Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Appellant

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603

(717)-669-2163

s [email protected]

http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/__





s [email protected]



Lancaster, PA 17603



PETITIONER : :

v. : CASE NO. 3400-2015:

:


RESPONDANT ::


:

SUBMISSION AS EXHIBIT BY APPELANT“Stan J. Caterbone United Nations Human Rights Council of Geneva Switzerland

Complaint and Exhibit re U.S. Sponsored Mind Control filed on October 4, 2009, November25, 2015 ”

I hereby on this 25th day of November, 2015, submit for considerations in the above captioned case the

attached document as an EXHIBIT to be considered by the court in the deliberations of this case. This exhibit, like

the previous EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court understand the complexity of the APPELLANT'S obligation to

provide the Court with the evidence and insight to support the APPELLANT'S claims and statements. These

documents will also provide the Court with sufficient knowledge of the APPELLANT'S claim of the value of the

Appellant's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S. Bankruptcy Case No. 05-23059. The

APPELLANT does not intend to overburden the Court with unnecessary filings, however this burden of supporting

the claims and statements falls on the shoulders of all those in the government that ignored the APPELLANT'S

pleas for help to resolve these issues dating back to the days immediately following the meeting with International

Signal & Control, Plc., (ISC) Executive Larry Resch on June 23, 1987.


Date: November 25, 2015 Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se

Appellant

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603

(717)-669-2163

s [email protected]








s [email protected]



Lancaster, PA 17603



PETITIONER : :

v. : CASE NO. 3400-2015:

:


RESPONDANT ::


:

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

I hereby on this 22nd day of November, 2015, the APPELLANT requests a 30 day CONTINUANCE for the

above captioned case in order to regain possession of a Lenovo Computer and establish a more secure and safe

manner to obtain computer services to restore the same said computer after hacking attacks. The EXHIBIT of

November 16, 2015 titled “Linkedin.com Restricted Access and Computer Hacking Documentation” contains

documentation of 15 computer repairs from reputable computer service groups for computer hacking since August

1 (Geek Squad), and one dating back to June 22, 2015 (Aplus Computers).

On November 15, 2015 the APPELLANT visited the Geek Squad in Lampeter Township at the Best Buy

Store to schedule another drop-off date for repairs. The Geek Squad employee, again agitated and harassed the

APPELLANT. The Geek Squad employee stated there were appointments opened all day. APPELLANT replied to

schedule the drop-off and the APPELLANT answered at 10:00am the following morning, November 16, 2015.

Then the Geek Squad employee said the “earliest time was 11:30am. Frustrated, the APPELLANT left the store.

The APPELLANT planned to call a supervisor. There was no email sent to confirm the appointment. The

APPELLANT showed up the next morning and took a photo outside the store to document the time of arrival, which

was 10:22am. A Geek Squad female employee asked for an appointment time and another Geek Squad mail

employee said he had a cancellation and would check the APPELLANT'S computer in in a few minutes, after he

was done working with another customer. The APPELLANT asked to roam the store, and the Geek Squad

employee told the APPELLANT that he had to stay in line. After about an hour of frustration, the APPELLANT

wrote instructions from another day's repair notes, dated and timed it, and signed it. The APPELLANT then took a





picture of the sheet of paper on the Lenovo computer. The APPELLANT left at 11:24 after first taking a photo of

the sign on the cash register that states “Your time is IMPORTANT to us.” The APPELLANT never received any

email confirmations for the repair, which never happened.

On November 18, 2015 Rod, the DCI Manager at Geek Squad in Lancaster left several messages

requesting that the APPELLANT come in to sign paperwork. The APPELLANT never heard of the person, nor did

he trust the message to be authentic. On November 21, 2015 the APPELLANT called Ron and he would not

provide any proof of identification and kept demanding that the APPELLANT come in to sign paperwork. The

APPELLANT accused Ron of being a law enforcement official and he got upset and said he was terminating the

call. The APPELLANT must now replace the Lenovo computer, which was purchased August 1, 2015. The

APPELLANT will not return to the Geek Squad at Best Buy for any reason unless security assurances are

promised and protection from stalking and harassment is guaranteed.

The APPELLANT submits this motion for consideration in the above captioned case, and as before

request the court to include this MOTION in the deliberations of this case. This exhibit, like the previous

EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court understand the complexity of the APPELLANT'S obligation to provide the

Court with the evidence and insight to support the APPELLANT'S claims and statements. These documents will

also provide the Court with sufficient knowledge of the APPELLANT'S claim of the value of the








Appellant

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603

(717)-669-2163

s [email protected]










s [email protected]



Lancaster, PA 17603



PETITIONER : :

v. : CASE NO. 3400-2015:

:


RESPONDANT ::


:

SUBMISSION AS EXHIBIT BY APPELANT“Complaint to General Counsel of PLCB and Letter to and From PA Attorney General

Kathleen Kane on November 21, 2015 ”











Unfortunately the APPELLANT'S emails and other documentation regarding the “incident” that was named

in the letter of November 16, 2015 from Rogrigo Diaz, Executive General Chief Counsel of the Pennsylvania Liquor

Control Board have been destroyed or removed from the APPELLANT'S computers and flash drives. On

November 12, 2015 after taking care of legal business in the Pennsylvania Superior Court Prothonotary's Office,

regarding Case No.'s 1561 MDA 2015 and 1961 MDA 2015, the APPELLANT proceeded to the Office of the

Executive General Chief Counsel of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board. As customary, the APPELLANT was

misdirected and given false directions. The APPELLANT checked into the security desk where a member of




SHADD Detective Agency was requesting identification. The APPELLANT provided a current drivers license and

was processed and cleared and given visitor badge no. 62. The Security Officer refused to allow the APPELLANT

access to the 4th floor office of the Executive General Chief Counsel of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board and

made declarations that the office is constantly receiving bomb and other threats on a daily basis. The Security

Officer requested that the APPELLANT leave the bound complaint at the Security Desk. The APPELLANT

requested that someone from the Executive General Chief Counsel's office come to the security desk to retrieve

the Complaint. The Security Officer agreed and called up to the office of the Executive General Chief Counsel.

About fifteen minutes later a woman approached the Security desk. The APPELLANT requested to see some form

of identification from the woman and she refused. The woman would only provide a first name. The APPELLANT

requested to take a photo of the woman, and again she refused. The Security Officer started to berate the

APPELLANT, so the APPELLANT handed over the bound complaint and started to turn around declaring that the

bound complaint “better be delivered to the Office of Chief Counsel”. The Security Officer placed his right hand on

his gun and shouted “is that a threat?”. The APPELLANT quickly responded “no” and immediately vacated the

building.

On Friday, November 20, 2015 the APPELLANT received via regular U.S. 1st class mail the attached letter and

immediately called the Office of Executive General Chief Counsel and DEMANDED that the Complaint be returned

to the APPELLANT as soon as possible, and terminated the phone call.



Appellant

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603

(717)-669-2163

s [email protected]






s [email protected]



Lancaster, PA 17603



PETITIONER : :

v. : CASE NO. 3400-2015:

:


RESPONDANT ::


:

SUBMISSION AS EXHIBIT BY APPELANT“Outstanding Accounts Receivables for Non-Litigation Items , November 20, 2015 ”













Appellant

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603

(717)-669-2163

s [email protected]












































[email protected]

https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone

Stan J. Caterbone

Advanced Media Group

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603

(717)669-2163

PRESS RELEASE

Saturday, July 4, 2015

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED

STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.

The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to

individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.

Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and direct energy weapons since 2005. He has also been telepathic since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic

telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United States federal and state courts. We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this

legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennsylvania State Representatives.

For More Information Please Contact Us At: [email protected] and visit our library of

documents at https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone

_________________________________________________

The draft of the legislation can be found on the following page:

Page 114-02559 Lambert Habeus Corpus Page 71 of 120 Sunday, November 29, 2015


District Office

Second Street

King City Mo.

660-535-6664

To Whom It May Concern,

This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly

by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violation and physical

injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on

men, women, and even children.

I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use

of Veri-chip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans.

Long before Veri-chip was known we were testing these devices on Americans, many without their

knowledge or consent.

There are new revelations of the cancer risk besides the privacy and human rights problems with the use of

Veri-chip and RF signals.

I am asking for your help in stopping these abuses and aiding those already affected.

Sincerely,

Rep. Jim Guest

May 21, 2009

Capitol Office

State Capitol

Jefferson City Mo.

573-751-0246


Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill

Section 1. Short Title -

This bill may be cited as the “Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons

Bill”””

Section 2. Findings and Purpose

A) Findings

1) The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration

of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among

these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, “the framers of the Constitution sought

"to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for

this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.“

3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that with respect to human research, the

voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehending.

4)There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to

Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of Cruel, Inhumane or Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any reservations, understandings, declarations, and provisions contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the

Convention.

B) Purpose

To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type of electronic frequency devices,

directed energy devices, implants, surveillance technology, and directed energy weapon to

purposefully cause any of the following: stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury, harmful surveillance, torture, diseases, and death to any United States citizen.

Section 3. Organized Stalking

If two or more persons willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously

harass another person and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are guilty of the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment,

or by imprisonment in a federal prison.

If two or more persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order,

injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a) against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three,

or four years.

For the purposes of this section, "harass" means engages in a knowing and willful course of

conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the

person, or damages his personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. * * *


For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a

period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected

activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."

For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that

performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern

of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target

of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family or personal property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to

prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of "credible threat."

For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited

to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices.

The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any

contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his

or her immediate family.

For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person

related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly

resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.

Section 4. Punishment for threats

Any person or persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great

bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in

writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and

thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed one year..

For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or

not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly

resided in the household.

"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones,

computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices

Obscene, threatening or annoying communication

(a) Every person or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by

means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the

person or any member of his or her family, or any property or personal possessions is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith.


(b) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by

means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or

electronic contacts made in good faith.

(c) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand

dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal prison for not more than one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following circumstances exist:

(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any

combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.

(2) The person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of

an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic

contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.

(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where

the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed

when the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the recipient.

(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a

telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b), or (c) upon receiving the return call.

(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person

or persons convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the person participate in counseling.

(g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not

limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices.

Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon

Any person or persons who in the course of organized stalking and harassment, commits an assault

upon the person of another with an unauthorized directed energy weapon shall be punished by

imprisonment in a federal prison for two, three, or four years or by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000).

For the purposes of this section the term directed energy weapon is defined as any device that

directs a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against a person or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means of

inflicting death or injury; or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health,


mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies

directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.


Richmond council passes resolution supporting ban on space-based weapons

May 20, 2015

FacebookTwitterMore9 comments

The Richmond City Council passed a resolution Tuesday supporting a ban on space-based weapons after a lengthy discussion over whether individuals are being psychologically

and physically harmed by exotic government-patented attacks from high in the sky.

Councilmember Jovanka Beckles, a member of the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA),

introduced the resolution, saying it begins to address concerns of a Richmond resident who claims she’s been targeted by “remote transmission” from space-based weaponry.

Others claiming to have suffered physical and psychological attacks traveled from around the country to speak at Tuesday’s council meeting. One speaker claimed to have been

zapped multiple times right before his testimony at council.

The resolution supports the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty

permanently banning “space-based weapons,” even though the legislation first introduced by Rep. Dennis Kucinich in 2001 has never gained traction in Congress. It appears that

Richmond is the first municipality in the U.S. to take up this lofty issue in more than a decade. In 2002, the City of Berkeley passed a similar resolution supporting the ban.

Conspiracy theorists believe the resolution is a step toward ensuring secret weaponry such as chemtrails, which are trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft that supposedly

emit a chemical or biological agent, can no longer target unwitting citizens. For RPA members on the council, the resolution is also an anti-war initiative.

RPA members on council, Gayle McLaughlin and Eduardo Martinez, also voted in favor of the resolution. Vice Mayor Jael Myrick and Councilmember Nat Bates were the final two

yes votes, although Bates claimed he was confused by the discussion.

“I’m going to support the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of


http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/richmond-council-passes-resolution-supporting-ban-on-space-based-weapons-2/#comments

https://www.fas.org/sgp/congress/2001/hr2977.html

http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/richmond-council-passes-resolution-supporting-ban-on-space-based-weapons-2/

dumb ideas,” Bates said.

Mayor Tom Butt voted no, saying he believes the conspiracy theory behind space-based

weapons is above the heads of city leaders and has taken time away from more pressing city matters such as the budget deficit, potholes, and crime. Butt has complained in the

past about the RPA attempting to hijack council sessions to push a radical agenda regardless of whether the issues are important to Richmond residents.

The mayor also pointed to a signed 1967 treaty banning the militarization of space.

The other dissenting vote came from Councilmember Vinay Pimple, who pointed out that

supporting a limitation on the ability of the U.S. to defend against attacks from long-range missiles might not be wise.

Pimple disputed what he called “knee-jerk” reactions from RPA members who depicted President Ronald Reagan’s proposed space-based anti-missile program of 1983, known as

the “Star Wars” initiative, as inherently evil. The Cold War initiative was intended to defend against USSR missiles during the Cold War and was shelved not for the project’s

moral ambiguity but its perceived effectiveness, Pimple said.

The idea behind Star Wars, Pimple said, “is you can knock out someone’s weapons long

before they enter your air space. The U.S. used Patriot missiles to knock out Iraqi Scuds targeting Israel and Saudi Arabia, he added.

RPA members, however, argued that this issue is not just about war but about the individuals in the U.S. who believe governments are using futuristic weapons in space for

the purpose of inflicting pain and mind control. Martinez argued that they may very well be telling the truth. He recalled a science fiction novel he wrote a paper on during college

that predicted truths 20 years in advance.

“It’s easy for me to see that things which are wrong can happen because we have the

wrong mindset,” Martinez said.

Myrick said he supported the resolution because he doesn’t support war.

“The weaponization of space…is something I think is extremely immoral and we should not be as a nation engaging in,” Myrick said. “Maybe some wars are unavoidable, that

may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country away from that mindset…..that’s why I support this resolution.”

Amy Lee Anderson, a “targeted individual” who brought the matter to Beckles’ attention, was thankful that the council took up the issue.

“No where in the United States, no targeted individual can get this support,” Anderson said. “We just needed one person, one city. Because of that, you all our heroes. We are

dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. It’s hard for someone who has no experience to fathom it, it’s so sophisticated.”

Related posts:

1. Richmond councilmember pushes city resolution banning ‘exotic’ space-based

weapons

2. Dirty bomb drill in Richmond alarms conspiracy theorists, including Alex Jones

Comments

1. C’mon Richmond Standard….your bias is showing!


http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/dirty-bomb-drill-in-richmond-alarms-conspiracy-theorists-including-alex-jones/

http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/richmond-councilmember-pushing-city-resolution-banning-exotic-space-based-weapons/

http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/richmond-councilmember-pushing-city-resolution-banning-exotic-space-based-weapons/

Stan J. CaterboneADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603

[email protected]

717-669-2163

October 10, 2015

Federal Whistleblower and

Targeted Individual (Victim) of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control

Executive Summary©

Updated on October 10, 2015

I remain,

Stan J. Caterbone

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, and the Advanced MediaGroup are victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and has been engaged in litigation in both

Federal and State courts seeking financial remedies and a resolution of his Civil Liberties andhis Constitutional Rights. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone, while managing the financial firm the he

founded, Financial Management Group, Ltd., Stan J. Caterbone became a Federal Whistleblowerwhen, as a shareholder, he claimed fraud and misconduct within the international arms dealer

and local start-up International Signal & Control, Plc., Some 4 years later ISC was indicted andplead guilty to the 3rd largest fraud in U.S. history, some $1 Billion and selling arms to Irag via

South Africa. In June of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone became the Movant in the U.S. District Courtfor the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD for the Habeus Corpus

Petition of Lisa Michelle Lambert. The case is now before the U.S. Third Circuit Court ofAppeals, Case No. 15-3400.

Page 1 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 201514-02559 Lambert Habeus Corpus Page 80 of 120 Sunday, November 29, 2015

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD.,

&

STAN J. CATERBONEFederal Whistleblower (Federal False Claims Act Violation in 1987 re ISC)

Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind Controland Directed Energy Devices and Weapons

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

copyright 2009

“Ya know what, I am beginning to analyze this War on Terror and am having difficulty understanding

it all. To me the most effective fundamental fight against Extreme Terrorism is to reduce the motive; or theHatred Against America. No one seems to talk about that subject. How do we reduce that Hatred Towards

America and the West?

See, from my perspective, my situation is very disturbing. I mean we have the United States Torturing Me, aU.S. Citizen for no good or valid reason. I have warned EVERYONE about using my situation to feed this

HATRED towards America.

Low and behold a week or so ago I have had several Muslims sign up as Followers to mywww.scribd.com/amgroup01 online webspace, which I use to post documents. The following being the most

prominent IKWAN Scope, "The Largest Muslim Brotherhood's Scope on the Web":

http://ikhwanscope.net/main/

There have also been several Muslim individuals who signed up as followers around the same time, a weekor so ago. They have also signed up as followers on my www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone webspace.

You must understand, I am a VERY Patriotic Person and live a very patriotic life - I believe in the

U.S. Constitution and Our Founding Father's vision for America; I support Our Military and ourTroops; I believe in the Rule of Law; I am a Practicing Catholic, and have been my whole life; I

Believe in the TRUTH; I believe in Right v. Wrong; Good v. Evil; and finally I believe in God. Whatdo you believe in?”

Posted on the Yahoo Fulton Bank Stock Message Board, January 7, 2010

Date Updated: October 10, 2015

Date Completed: July 28, 2009

Date Initiated: July 8, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone

Advanced Media [email protected]



http://www.scribd.com/amgroup



http://www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone

http://ikhwanscope.net/main/

UDATE OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2015

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again return to local,

state, and federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture,

trespass, thefts, and the like began in earnest. From the fabricated Petition for Involuntary

Psychiatric Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J.

Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and

rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz. The

psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion. By

the end of the summer of 2010 every social media site, including the

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com website was taken off-line due to the intimidation and

coercion by Detective Clark Bearinger.

In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the “Attacks” and “Torture” from the

employees of the Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building.

Then soon after the Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking

Campaign. In addition an extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in

an effort to again SILENCE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group. And Again, the

Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state

and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White

House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and

Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.

Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office. Since August 1,

2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer

hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.

On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus

Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul

Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to

be granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling

evidence, or lack there of. The Amicus was filed to cure that deficiency with direct

witness corroboration to the Prosecutorial Misconduct and Innocence of Lisa Michelle

Lambert. In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter

Police Department engaged in a strategy of “Entrapment” that lead to the unfortunate

murder in 1991. This, would of course, allow a wrongful death claim to be filed by the

Show family. The case is now before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 15-

3400. There are three (3) questions that the Third Circuit may rule on; whether to free



Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary

Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.

Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated

Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in

the Fairmount Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia. However, this time there was no

MANDATORY Treatment Program Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.

So Stan J. Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a

desperate attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in

the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far

as to undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions

of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of

$600.00.

On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,

Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman. The Complaint contained

allegations of torture and abuse at every moment of contact. The Lancaster City Police

Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert

case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the

fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on

August 8th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of

Common Pleas.

On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster

County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey

Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of

Pennsylvania.

In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing

Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the

U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County

community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis. The

community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.

John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the

Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.


In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately 45

audio cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range in date from 1971 to

1996. The tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P. Caterbone and

Stan J. Caterbone. In addition the tapes confirm that Steven P. Caterbone, brother of Stan J.

Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of

Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.

In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National

Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to

find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family. Phil interviewed all living

descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am

alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and

provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.


HISTORY

In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal

and Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred. After discussions with ISC and United

Chem Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since

1983 of ISC, Stan J. Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which

resulted in a 22 year legal odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company,

Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public

allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials

and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations including the

selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein. However, money, power,

influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal False Claims

Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a total blockade of

all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal, state, and

local laws. This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;

personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most

valuable asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-To-

Work under federal statutes. Notwithstanding, Stan J. Caterbone has never made a bad

investment or developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22 years. This

includes two real estate properties that were illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.

Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state. ISC was a

Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies

since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National

Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.

In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding INTERNATIONAL

SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:

Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with

over 5,000 employees.

James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable

organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United

States as of 1992.


The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:

George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central Intelligence

Agency (CIA).

Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current

Secretary of Defense.

Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and

currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research organizations.

Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of

Directors?

Joseph McDade, former Pennsylvania House of Representative and Chair of the

Appropriations Committee who was later investigated for the United Chem Con

scandal.

Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms

merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle EasternCountries under U.S. sanctions.

ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S.

Patent Office.

In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great

Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's

subsidiaries.

ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel

regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraqstory and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert

Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.

ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam

Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I,with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by

Carlos Cardoen.

On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of Lancaster

Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal &Control (ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph

Roda did absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would notbelieve him.

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),

Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal

counsel, and never mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987.

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), James

Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at Fulton Bank,Lancaster, County.



Christopher Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker, represented JamesGuerin. In 2005 Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim Township Police

Department (05-cv-2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District ofPennsylvania) CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,.


Philadelphia Attorney Joseph Tate represented James Guerin and ISC, and in 2007

Joseph Tate represented Scooter Libby during his federal prosecution by U.S.Special Prosecutor Fitzpatrick.

THE MANIFEST OF A COVER-UP

Not only did the allegations of fraud within ISC have to be silenced at a time when merger

negotiations were ongoing with Ferranti, but all of the fraud; extortion; public corruption;

burglaries; civil rights violations; anti-trust and intellectual property right violations; lender

liability torts; false arrests; false imprisonments; as well as other civil and criminal activities had

to be covered up and buried in bureaucratic red tape. Information and findings are still being

uncovered and discovered to this day. Contrary to popular belief, up until 1996 a grand jury

investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these

activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The

pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over

time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order

to perpetrate the cover-up:

Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way

possible.

Fabricate a history of mental illness.

Fabricate a criminal record.

Attach his character and honesty with rumors and propaganda.

Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.

Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where possible.

Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family

into a life of solitaire.

Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of

action through money, favors, etc.,

Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community

away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.

When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort

any monies and/or possessions of value.


Change the history of events and the truth.

THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM

For 18 years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues

from court dockets and judges. During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least

twenty attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of

specialties. Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited

and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are

now globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted

these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved

such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or

their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and

the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be

influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in

nature and in malice.

However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant

representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv-

2288. This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J.

Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of

Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security

of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May

16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal.

One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,

Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under

the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.

These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet

another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking

with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total

Mind Control.


REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND

WEAPONS.

Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud

within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to

suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or

"remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and

never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of

Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie

Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was

the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the

topic. Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way

without success.

In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental

telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices

and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.

This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action

in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This

assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The

main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is

connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of

Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person

without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of

Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment. See attached documents for

more information.

In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into

mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program

labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.


FAMILY HISTORY

If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,

Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes something like

the following:

Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family

because of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning

business. He traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and

Space Aliens. He ended up living in government subsidized housing broke

and with a severe mental illness.

Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has his

father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in California.

Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as

his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and

finally committed suicide at an early age.

Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and

had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services

industry. When he has his nervous breakdowns, he always threatens to sue

everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is

against him. He always spends all of his money during his fits of mania and

has delusions about his success as a businessman.

The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,

father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began

during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner. Samuel Caterbone,

Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His brother, Samuel

A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is

most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA

or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions

with both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that

were preserved in their estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high school

documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's

subprograms.


The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:

Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and

graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida. He was an exceptional

student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as well

as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a

successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the

solvents. He also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike,

owning several properties. By his own writings and from his personal accounts to me, he was

definitely a remote viewer or data miner for some U.S. Agency with telepathic abilities. His

viewing is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from organized

stalking, and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the state. Back in the 1960's, he was a

world traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a

covert carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history

laced with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another subprogram of

MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the Lancaster City

Police Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In 1973 Samuel P.

Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking

account. The one check to Joe the Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never

entered into evidence, it was for a total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster

Attorney James Coho for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his

only criminal record. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President

Judge William Johnstone. However, on August 29, 1973 after nine months, Judge Johnstone

wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the

County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common

Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own

corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial

Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien to learn more

on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and documentation to know that his

life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised

from family and friends, and of course a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of

his record online. On or about May 18, 2001 Samuel P. Caterbone Jr., finally received an

inheritance from his mother's (Mary Caterbone) estate. The check was for some $70,000.00.

The estate was probated in November of 2000. Some two weeks later, on Memorial Day Weekend

of 2001, he had called me to come to New York City to help care for him. He was in perfect

health until this time. In a matter of six (6) weeks he had succumbed to lung cancer. As per

Julianne McKinney, former intelligence officer for the U.S. Army and victim activist of U.S.

Sponsored Mind Control, the weapons are lethal enough to kill and “the one thing that I worry


about is that of dying of cancer” (paraphrase). There is no doubt now that my father's death was

a murder, not natural.

Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970.

In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel

A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of

October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the subject matter,

with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January 14, 1992. By his own

admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD"

trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others

questioned the classification of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately

responsible for his death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara

Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than

suicide. Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending

Lancaster Catholic High School. After playing varsity football as a sophomore, he had an

unfortunate accident while deer hunting the following November. While in the woods in

Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm. It left him in the

Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation. The

hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life. The Schizophrenia

diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.

Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set

a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic

Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996.

Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and

lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and

Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288.

FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this

day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an

exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the

Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey

and Franklin and Marshall College. Thomas P. Caterbone had a very successful lawn and

landscaping business before joining forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and

selling residential mortgages. John DePatto was the former head of Parent Bank, owned by

James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike,

Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars

of equity was extorted in the process, despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith


Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High

School.

Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer (at least one way in), is telepathic, and a

federal whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his adversaries

and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he has endured and

will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to preserve his claims, and progress his

legal challenges and claims through both the federal and state court system appearing pro se,

without the aid or expense of additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most

likely be landmark decisions in years to come. Stan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster

Catholic High School, in both football and track. Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B

grade in his four years of high school and had an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in

computer technologies, taking his first full term course in 1975, while in high school and

continuing into college at Millersville University, graduating with a degree in business

administration in 1980. Stan J. Caterbone excelled profoundly at building his companies, first

beginning with Financial Management Group, Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power

Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then building Advanced Media Group, Ltd.. Over the

years, despite the illegal seizures and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of

impressive real estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they

were sold. The same was true of his businesses. Financial Management Group, Ltd., was a

$20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later,

despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value and equity.

The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a

close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in

very short fashion. There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and

Record:

One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,; every instance of the word

used by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated

with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word

"delusional". And they still exist to this very day.

Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August

10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?), 2005

by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the 302

Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.

The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false

arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on summary

appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone appearing as


pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE

v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of

Pennsylvania.

THE PUBLIC RECORD

The Public Record is comprised of court filings and exhibits in U.S. Federal Courts;

Pennsylvania State Courts; and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In all some 40,000

pages of documents are now filed and electronically scanned or microfilmed in prothonotary

offices. In addition in both the U.S. Federal Courts and the Lancaster County Court of Common

Pleas there are more than 11 hours of audio recordings; some 3,000 scanned images; and

several video broadcasts of the ISC News broadcasts all stored on a CD-ROM and filed as an

exhibit to some of the law suits filed by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, as

plaintiffs. Stan J. Caterbone has over 100 court docket sheet numbers in federal, state, and local

courts.

There are also Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation records; Department of Welfare

and Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County

Tax Assessment records; Social Security Administration Benefits records; Lancaster Catholic High

School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; all for Stan J. Caterbone, in addition to his

court filings.

For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force service

records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; Social

Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian and Public Defender records;

and papers and documents persevered from his estate.

For Samuel P. Caterbone, my father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster

Catholic High School transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster County

Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment

records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate Deeds and Mortgages;

Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal records; and of course papers and

documents persevered from his estate

PUBLIC WEBSITE ADDRESSES OF INTEREST:

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.comwww.freedomffchs.com

https://www.scribd.com


https://www.scribd.com/

http://www.freedomffchs.com/


DOCUMENTS ATTACHED FOR REVIEW

** It is important to note that as of this writing, Remote Viewing has recently

been commercialized by corporate America, and certain Fortune 500 companies are

using Remote Viewers as consultants for trend analysis and market forecasts. This is

often the evolution of most technologies born out of the U.S. Department of Defense.

Top Secret experiments and the resulting technological advancements can stay

secretive for so long. This has recently been used in a NBC story of the Television

drama "Medium" this last season. On July 9, 2008 I had recorded an AM radio live

broadcast on WHAN Coast to Coast with a guest that was one of the leading Physicist

turned Remote Viewer and expert that testified to this same notion.

Dated: July 28, 2009

Stan J. CaterboneAdvanced Media Group

[email protected]

The following are no longer in service:www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com

www.scribd.com/amgroup01www.facebook.com/scaterbone

www.twitter.com/StanCaterbonewww.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone

http://ww w.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup



http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup


http://www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone

http://www.twitter.com/scaterbone

http://www.facebook.com/scaterbone

http://www.scribd.com/amgroup01

http://www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com/


September 7, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone

Advance Media Group1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603

Derrick RobinsonFreedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance

P.O. Box 9022Cincinnati, Ohio 45209

Phone 1-800-571-5618Fax 1-866-433-4170

email: [email protected]

Re: Is County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Ground Zero for Organized Stalking andCovert Surveillance?

Derrick,

My pleasure. Derrick, I was trying to get group rates at our new Lancaster Convention Center

Marriot Hotel last week, just as a little fact finding mission. I have a theory that I would like tosend your way. I thought it would be very fruitful to bring some TI's together for a conference,

unless you think the exposure would be harmful.

I believe that they try new models for harassment; organized stalking and surveillance on mehere in Lancaster. Remember, Lancaster is now one of the most "Watched Communities" in the

country. "With those cameras, the Safety Coalition will operate and monitor 165 cameras acrossLancaster City — making Lancaster the most watched city of its size in the nation." See article

attached, Watching you: City to add 105 more cameras.

I believe that Lancaster may be ground zero for some of the models of organized stalking andharassment that we TI's experience and wanted to get some reaction from Lancaster. Some

history on the Lancaster Convention Center. Dale High of High Industries is the lead partner in ournew convention center/hotel. It is first class all the way. Now in the late 1980's I was a joint

venture partner with Dale High in American Helix Technology Company/Advanced Media Group.American Helix was a cd manufacturer and I and my company Advanced Media Group was the

CD-ROM division of American Helix. I was one of a handful of CD-ROM manufacturers in thedomestic United States back then. Also in 2005 I filed a civil action against the lead hotel, the

Eden Resort Inn, for trying to block the development and building of the Hotel/Convention Center,see attached.

Now, some history about Lancaster and the intelligence community. Back in the 1980's there were

several defense contractors located in Lancaster, the main being International Signal & Control,which I, of course, blew the whistle on a billion dollar fraud and arms to Iraq.

Click here for an overview of ISC.

Click here to see t he Lancaster Newspapers Archives regarding International Signal & Control, or

ISC.

Click here to view the live video of the WGAL-TV News Broadcast of October 31, 1991 the eveningof the ISC indic tments. The U.S. Department of Justice and other U.S. Agencies held a Press

Conference in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse to announce the indictments and $ BillionDollar Fraud.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kOIOTpxtj8





http://advancedmediagroupresearch.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/isc-search-lancaster-newspapers-archives-dec-25-2007.pdf



http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/gpage13.html

http://advancedmediagroupresearch.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/lnp-isc-headlines-may-22-2007.pdf




http://www.freedomfchs.com/

http://www.freedomfchs.com/

Click here for Part 2 of the WGAL-TV 8 Broadcast.

Now politically, Lancaster is and has always been predominately Republican. Lancaster is one ofthe oldest cities in the country and our courthouse was one of the first in this country. Lancaster

has one of the oldest fraternities of the Masons. Lancaster and the George W.Bush administrationhas a close and very "interesting relationship". George H. Bush had a very close relationship with

ISC, and of course the NSA and CIA all had a very "close" relationship with International Signal &Control, or ISC. The following are some transcripts for Ted Koppel and ABC News Nightline

regarding ISC and Arms to Iraq and the intelligence community. The transcripts are contained inmy Amicus for Case No. 2006-cv-2160 filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.

Now, Robert Gates, presently the Secretary of the United States Defense Department, and his

relationship to Lancaster. First of all, the attached video is the authentic transcript of RobertGates' confirmation hearing in September of 1991 for the Director of the Central Intelligence

Agency (CIA). If you fast forward to approximately 9:00:00 you will see the back and forthquestions from Senator Murkowski to Robert Gates regarding the allegations by several members

of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding his alleged involvement with ISCand the Arms deals with Carlos Cardoen and the shipping of cluster bombs through South Africa

and on to Iraq. Of course, he denied all of the allegations.

Robert Gates also has relatives that live in Lancaster County, if fact he attended a wedding here afew months ago, on May 3, 2009 at St. John Neuman Catholic Church in Manhiem Township,

Lancaster County. His wife has a niece that lives in Manheim Township.

Now, I'll give you the ABC News Nightline May 23, 1991 excerpt regarding ISC and the NSA,National Security Agency:

"It all started legally, if covertly, back in 1974. That's when the National Security Agency, a super-

secret U.S. Intelligence unit asked ISC to help complete project X, a chain of electronic listeningposts based at South Africa's Simonstown Naval Station. South Africa was using these posts to

follow Soviet submarine traffic off of the Cape of Good Hope. To ensure secrecy, ISC and the NSAmade sure shipments could not be tracked back to them. They created a company called Gamma

Systems Associates. In fact, this company was nothing more than a post office box at John F.Kennedy Airport. Gamma was a cut-out. ... But this sanctioned covert operation was stopped in

1977 when President Carter, a strong opponent of South Africa's apartheid regime, told U.S. firmsto stop any military-related business with Pretoria. But ISC continue shipping electronics, some

civilian, some military, to South Africa. The in the early 1980's, South Africa began to intensify itsefforts at ballistic missile development. For ISC, that was a golden opportunity because on of its

top executives was a man named Clyde Ivey, an American electronics expert who has been thefather of South Africa's missile program. Ivey had extraordinary contacts in the nations defense

structure. Begining in 1984, federal investigators say, senior ISC exeutives, including Ivey, beganregular contacts with CIA officials." You can read the rest. The entire transcript of the May 23,

1991 ABC News/Nightline broadcast.

Now remember, George H. Bush was director of CIA. "He served in this role for 357 days, fromJanuary 30, 1976 to January 20, 1977.[22] The CIA had been rocked by a series of revelations,

including those based on investigations by Senator Frank Church's Committee regarding illegaland unauthorized activities by the CIA, and Bush was credited with helping to restore the

agency's morale.[23] In his capacity as DCI, Bush gave national security briefings to JimmyCarter both as a Presidential candidate and as President-elect, and discussed the possibility of

remaining in that position in a Carter administration[24] but it was not to be," according toWikipedia.

Now, lets get to Bobby Ray Inman, former Navy, Director of the National Security Agency (NSA),

former Director of International Signal & Control (ISC), and currently part of the Mind Controlindustry. The following appears on the Welcome page of my website:


http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=LC&p_theme=lc&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&s_dispstring=headline(Robert%20Gates)%20AND%20date(last%206%20months)&p_field_date-0=YMD_date&p_params_date-0=date:B,E&p_text_date-0=-6qzM&p_field_advanced-0=title&p_text_advanced-0=(%22Robert%20Gates%22)&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&xcal_useweights=no





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9gTaCexSNc

"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting arrangements, via

their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big timedefense contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense contractor.

Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others."by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996. In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman

requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his criticsspeculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a

member of the so-called "shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent orapproved the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).

Now, lets list the former Navy personnel:

George H. Bush, former President of the United States, former Director of CIA.

James Guerin, President and Founder of International Signal & Control.

Bobby Ray Inman, former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and Director of

International Signal & Control, (ISC).

My father, Samuel P. Cateronne, Jr.

His father, Samuel J. Caterbone, Sr.

George Noory, of Coast to Coast Radio (just anecdotal, nothing assumed or alleged).

George W. Bush flew with the Navy.

James Cross

I will Finish later and add more.

Next we get to Jim Guerin's attorney back in 1989 through at least 1992. His name was JosephTate, of Philadelpha. This link will take you to a document regarding Joseph Tate, James Guerin

and Joseph Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, my former attorney who said I fabricated everything back in1987. The document contains a letter of September 12, 2005 from Special Prosecutor Patrick

Fitzgerald regarding Scooter Libby, Former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. the letterinvolves Scooter Libby's Grand Jury Indictment for leaking Covert CIA Operative Valerie Plame

and eventually outing her.

Now in Austin Texas in July of 2005 I was detained by 2 Agents from The Defense IntelligenceAgency. I was merely visiting a Military Museum, that had old and vintage helicopters and

airplanes. near where my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone lived. I was visiting on my way toCalifornia. While inside the museum 2 Agents from the Department of Defense Defense

Intelligence Agency escorted me outside to my Honda Oddesey and interrogated me making meconfirm that I was visiting and staying with my brother. They caused a problem for my brother's

Medical Practice by shaking up one of his secretaries. The reviewed my court documents forCATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., Case No. 2005-cv-0288 filed in the U.S. District

Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The demanded that I stay off all military basesbefore releasing me.

In 2006 I was telepathic with an older NSA executive on many occasions who wanted to meet me

at the Clipper Stadium who told me he wanted to rent a facility in Lancaster for a trainingexercise. I told him to to and see Dale High and the High Group for space at the Greenfield

Industrial Park. He said he was retiring and that our discussions were keeping him a few weekslonger than expected. We had intimate discussions of my history and the Chesapeake Bay Area.

We also discussed Sheryl Crow, and he told me his wife was a fan. I turned him on to her newalbum, Wildflower, and he said she liked it. We had to disengage because he was being harassed

by other telepathic assailants.My former secretary (Susan Bare) at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., where I was controller and was

hired to rescue the company from near bankruptcy in 1993, told me that her husband, Ross Bare,who grew up just some 10 or so doors from me, worked for the NSA. She disclosed this soon

after I hired her in 1994 or 1995.

I will finish later and add to this allegation. This is a work-in-progress.





http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/joseph-f-roda-documents-for-sammy-guerin-june-29-2007.pdf




Stan J. Caterbone

Advanced Media [email protected]

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.comwww.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com

www.scribd.com/amgroup01www.facebook.com/scaterbone

www.twitter.com/StanCaterbonewww.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone




http://www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone

http://www.twitter.com/scaterbone

http://www.facebook.com/scaterbone

http://www.scribd.com/amgroup01

http://www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com/



AFFIDAVIT

BE IT ACKNOWLEDGED, that Stanley J. Caterbone, Financial Management Group, Ltd.,

FMG Advisory, and and all affiliates, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., Advanced Media Group, Advanced

Media Group, Ltd., Global Entertainment Group, Ltd., Power Productions I, Radio Science

Laboratories, Ltd., of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, the undersigned deponent, being of legal

age, does hereby depose and say under oath as follows:

I am now convinced that the situation surrounding my litigation and all factors attributed

to my financial and professional demise bore out of the fact that my Father, Samuel P. Caterbone

was a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, in the truest sense of the words. The

whistleblowing activities of 1987 either were a coincidence or I was set up in the very beginning

by Pennsylvania State Senator Gibson Armstrong (former stock broker) in 1983 when he solicited

me to purchase the ISC stock. The preceding would have been the perfect cover story for my

demise; that I was involved in a fraud. Following this analysis would lead one to conclude that

the collateral damage from the activities of my financial ruin always left my fellow businesses in

financial ruin, for example Robert Kauffman and Michael Hartlett, partners, and the shareholders

and affiliated professionals of Financial Management Group, Ltd., Tony Bongiovi and Power Station

Studios, Jim and Lynn Cross as Cross Microwave Consultants, Dave Dering, Scott Robertson, and

James Boyer as American Helix/High Industries, Ralph Mazzochi and Gallo Rosa Restaurant;

Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Mike Caterbone's AIM Wholesaler's Business, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, D.O.

And associated Primary Care Practices of Austin, Texas, Sam Lombardo and Ralph Mazzochi as

S.N. Lombardo Associates for Lancaster Avenue Project, Sheryl Crow Singer Songwriter, my

immediate family, friends, and relatives.

Following this analysis would lead one to concur that the legal and financial remedies

would only be reconciled by the above named parties enjoining my civil litigation. This AFFIDAVIT

is to be considered a legal and binding document to accomplish that remedy.





s [email protected]


www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com

www.scribd.com/amgroup01

www.facebook.com/scaterbone

www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone

www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone


Stan J. Caterbone

Advanced Media Group

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603

ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUPViolations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination

and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to Authorities

September 27, 2015

Work-In-Progress

Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy – Issue a few every

year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition to

isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from

defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strong

Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The

Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of

entitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during

the same time period.

1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm – Served by State Constable in June of

2005, original not signed by David Pflumm

2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner – Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.

3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing

Fulton Bank in 2006 – Sent via 1st Class Mail

4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,

Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with Barley

Snyder, LLC, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.

5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster City

Police in 2006, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.

6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,

and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006

7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice

8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael

Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice, allowed to enter in 2015.

9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John

Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice

10.Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice

11.Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in

March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail

12.Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice

13.Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by

Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.


14.TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice

15.Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No

Formal Notice

16.Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police

Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice

17.O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.

18.Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security

Officer.

19.Tobias Frog Restaurant and Bar, August 8, 2015 by Owner of Establishment, reason

was for complaining of harassment and stalking.

20. Millersville University, July 9, 2015, served notice by Millersville University Police

Chief Pete Anders, for negotiating a civil rights complaint with Assistant to the President,

Debra Hoeckler

21.Village Nightclub, July of 20015, by George..........., Owner, tried to enter several times,

with no reason and no written notice.

22.Lucky Dog Bar, August of 2015, met Abby and Keagan Pflumm outside, went inside and

was told by bartender to leave and not come back.

23.Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, receptionist Ms. Woods refused to let me

communicate with Attorney George Werner, who in 2011 entered appearance in 05-2288

for Fulton Bank in U.S. District Court.

24.Wennerstrom Property Management Company, June 2015, went to complain

regarding harassment, threats, etc., at 1252 Fremont Street and told to leave building.

Dated: September 27, 2015





��

�

��

�!" ��# ��"��$%�&�� !�� "�#��$��%��

�� "&#� �� '�� $��(��%�� '�� (�� "� � ")��"�� *�� )�� !�� "� !��+ �"� *�� "� ,�

!�� ,�""�� !�" � ��!��"� �� !�� "��!�� ,��,�

��+ �� "�-�� !��!� �� )��

�� *�� %� �� (�� *�� (��

��%�� !�� .�� /"0��!�� , �*��1��!��+��2"3��

�

� � 4��- �� 1 �� "��"� 1�,� � !�� !� � ��4�� 1�,� � �� !��!� �� )�� ** !"��

�� ! ��5� ��6 )��"��"�� #��4��4��+��&,,-��.��.��$��/��..$/�� &,,0��

��%��%��1��2��1��%�� &,,� � � � 3�� &,,�� %�� 4��%��

��%��

& � �� ,��,"� �� " �"�� !,�� " � �5�� 00�� 6��

��7��8��9��%��

: � 7-�� 8, �9��, �"2��! "�,��,�, ��!��1� �, �� ** !��

��, �!� ��:��7 �� ),��.��4��;��

��&,,-��(��&<;=�� 5��(�� >�� $;$��?�� $��

�� !��%��%��4�� 1��&,,@��&,,=��,�� $��>��

�� A��1�B3��.+�� &,,= ��1�B3�� 2�� >��

��%��


�

< � � )�� *� "� )� �� !�� A�� 24��1��!��'��&,,��&,�, ��A��%��

1�� 2��5�� %��%�� "��#9� �� 9� ��

- � ��!��)��"��"��"�� ;��"� ��,�� .��4��4��"$��C#��&,,@(&,,= ��A��D��$��

3�� 1�� B�� 3�� 24�� %�� 5�� !�� %��

��% � ��&,,0��4��%�� %�� !��%�3��%� ��

@ � <�� "�- �� "" ��*�� ,�!� "��+��,�� :��

!�� *�� %�� E�� %�� 0�=� ��

�� 9� �� 9� �� $�� 0�=9��00&9�00��&,,-��&,�, �$�� !��

��%��%�� !�� %�� D��3��$�� !��%��%�� 3��

= � �))��/4��0��),�� "��$��;��F��G��+��0�=��/��F��G��%�� !��+��$��3��00� ��&,,<��

�� 3�� *�� E�� 3�� 3�� "�� H��%#� �� $��/��%��$��D��$��$��.��+��

��&,,-��&,�, ��

� � 4�!-��"�� , ��- ��.�� 3�� *�� &,,@� �� D�� $�� /�� B��$��&,,� ��

0 � 6��-)�! � �� 24�� 0�=� �� .�� A�� *�� D�� /��4� �� /�� 00�� 3�� $�� 00=;�00� � � .�� 5��:��

��

�, � #��!� 7�� 3�� %�� &,,-� �� &,�,� �� !�� D�� $��

$��!��D��$��3��D��3��$��D�%��A��D��E�� 7F��!��8�F��D��$��&,,-��&,,0��>�� %�� !��D��$��

3��D��A��%�� ;��%�� .��+�%� ��%�� 4 ��E�� $��


�

�� ) �� 7�� 24�� 00�� F��F��A��$;$��(F��7��8 ��!��

�� .�� ,-(&&��&,,-��1��$��2��1��3��

�& � # � =�� $�� %�� &,,-� �� D�� $�� /��B��3��1��

�: � �� 5�� "� �*� <�� :#��) �� "�� .�� 0�=� ��/��F��G�� 00�9��00=(�00�9��&,,-��&,�, ��.��3��B�� B�� 3��1�� $�� 3�� .��/��$��

�< � �� > )�"" ""��"�� 0�=� �� /��;3��$��&,,@��

�- � #,�"�!��""��"��E��%��D��E��$��&,,-��$��D�� 3��

�@ � ��" � �� ""�� 24�� =� �� 0�=� �� &,� �� &,,-� �� &,,@� �� $��3��D��$��$��$��3�� !��

�= � ��" � ��)��"�� "�� =� ��,�� D��$��3�� 0�=��@,��&,,@�� !��@,�1�� &,,@� �� 9��

�� !��@,�� !��

�� #"�!,��!��" "�1�,��" ��!�� "�*��# �) ��":��- �"��E�� 0�=� �� /�� F��

G�� .�� &,,-� �� !�� !��B��3��

�0 � ��"�� #��) ��.��0�=��/��F��G��00�9��00=(�00�9��&,,-��&,�, ��.��3��B�� B�� 3�� 1�� $�� 3�� /��$�� :�� &,,-��

��'��9��9��9��9��9�� A�� %��

��

&, � ("� ��,�� !�� .�� 00�� $�� 3�� $�� !��7��8��

&,�,�� !�� F��&,,��&,�, �


�

&� � �, *"��*�#��) ��F��)��$��

&& � ��"��:��!-�� &,,-��4��%�� A��D��$��3��1��

&: � ��;�!��, ��!��"��>��?�" �� 24��&,,0�� 5��>��;�� B��

��%� ��

&< � ��)� �� <!-�� $��/��%�� $��D��$��$��.��+��&,,-��

&,�, ��F�� $��%��&,�, ��5��%��%��(�� 2�� %��

&- � �� -�� A�� &,,-� �� &,�, � � $�� A�� )��A��+��.+��$��$��

&@ � �� * � �! :� ��:�, *� �*� @�� 7��"�� .�� 3�� 0�= � � ��&,,�� &,,0�� 3�� *��

&= � 5� !�� !� 6 )��"� ��"�� 7�"!� � �)"�":��)"�� .��4��&,,@�� E��4��&,,@��"��#��

&� � 5� !�� !�6 )��"��"�� ;��.��4��&,,- ��

&0 � ��! ��<�")��+��"��.��/��0�=�"&#��@��-��9�&,,@��:��9�&,,0��

��9��&,�,�� .��$��$��/��B��00��&,,� ��

:, � 7��)�� , *� �*��!�� "��F�� 0�= ��

A��;A�� 0�=� �� F��0�= ��


� � �3� � ��!�� !��6��0�= � ��0�=� �� "��$��.��.��

�� +�� 1�� $�� .�� #� �� I�$��$��"2��!��$��+��#�� '��J��+�� .�� 00&� ��

�+$;F��&,;&,��F��00� �!��'�� D�� 3�� $� 24��"$��A�� +��1��.��#�� $��$� ��$��1��1��"1E1#�$��

�� K�� 0=,K� ��E�� K�� 3��>��L��F��F��.� �A��A�� .��F��+��B��+��1��$�

��+��1��$��$ ��$��1��1�� B�� 6�� $� �� 3��>�� +�� B�� 1�� $��

��$��!�� 00,K�� >�� 1�� B�� 3��>�� 1�B3�� F�� !�� F��!� �� !�A�! � � � � !�� >��

�� 1��1�� 00��%�� F��F�� )��%��3��F��7��8 � � � ��

&,,-��&�1��1�� !�4�� '�� A��.��3��!�4��

�� A�� F�� 4�� 0<,K�� 4��

��0=,K��0�,K��00,K��9�� A� ��.��1�� 3��>�� %�� 2!� �4�� /��&,,��F��)��%�$�� A�� .��

�� 0@,K�� D�1� �4�� A?�D!B�� 0@,K��"��#��+��$��0�<9��F��$��$��*��00� �/��

��7��D�18�� .�� E��%��0�=��

��$ ��%��0�,K��M��M � 1�� $�� 0�=�� 00�� 00=� E�� %�� /�� %�� 4�� !�� &,,-�� (

�� 9� �� 9� �� ;�� !�� 1��$��$�!2B+EF2��

D��$��3�� ,-(��(&&�� !��


�

�� # �") !�� "�7!��N��(�� O� �� O� �� N��

�� .�� !�� 5��4��(��F�� 5��(

�� G��A�� 8� A'��, �? ��*��? 1�� *��"�"��*�#"�!,�"�"� ��, � ��,��*�7��"��

� !,��A�� ,�

(��> " �!,��'!�� B��$C��*�#"�!,�D��!�� "��&��

�73��"��

��#��(��K��;�� 2�� .��

��"��#�(��K�� !�� ;�� 5�� 7�� !��8� �� 9� ��9� ��9� ��9�

��9��9�� %�� !��%��(�� %�� '�� 5��

��%�� !��7A��8�!��$��'��O��7D�.2��(��8�!��8 ��*��

��O��%�8 ��

�

'��+ ��(��-��

7��(�� '��%��(

�� %��

!��%��%��%�� 4��%�� K��

�� K�� M��M� �� M�%��M� �� %��(��K�� 8

'��+ ��-��6 �"� �

� ��7E��%�� '��N�� %(�� (

�� 4�� (��;�� !��(�� (

�� 7��8��(��7��8�� 8�7�-�7��>�!,


!�� *�, " ��1"�

��!�� , �*��1��3��@��E��!� ��DD� �! ��1��*��))��)��

��@��E��!� ��DD��-��

�B��&.��@��DD��

�B�@��.��DD��")��!��"��,"��*�"�� *� ��(��!� ��")��"��

� ��"�

�B�@��&�DD�� )��"� ��

�B�@��.��DD�� )��*��,"�� !��*��1�

�B�@��&��DD��)��!�� *�" ��*��

�B�@��$�DD��")��!��7��

�B�@��DD�7��

�B�@��E��DD��"!��"�� *��*��

.��@��EB&�DD��!��*�� )��*��,"�

.��@��EB��DD��")��!�� * � �1�,�!��,"�

&��@��&�B�DD�6,�"� ��1 ��)�� !��"�

�B�@��DD�5��"� ��!��!�

�B�@��&�DD��1�� "":��!��

�B�@��DD��) ��1�,��1�� "":��!��

�B�@��&�DD�> ��"��1�� "":��!��

�B�@��DD�'�"��!��!�� "��!��*��!��*�� "�� "��

��

�B�@��E�DD��) �� ; �!�" ��*��,"�� )��)� � ��"��!��

��) � �� * � �1�,�"� �

�B�@��%��DD��*�) �F��)��!��, ��!��) �F��

�"E��#��PPPPPPP�"��%# ��

�

��>7��'?��

�� %��4��%��

�� "��#�PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP��F��"��# �PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP��1�� PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP��PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP�$��PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP�

��PPPPPPP��PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP��&,PP��PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP��F��3��24� �PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP�

��I�� .��.��$��/��I�� $��Q�&,�,�"!��

��&,�,��.��.��$��/��I�� #�

Stan J. CaterboneStan J. Caterbone

June 19, 2015

Pennsylvania

Lancaster

19 June 15

Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98 Don't Know When

SJC


THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 35 of 41 06/10/2007


THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 36 of 41 06/10/2007





Documents

Recorded and Docketed 14-02259 Lambert Habeus MOTION to Recuse Judge Paul Diamond November 29, 2015 Docketed on December 7, 2015 (Small)