23
Matthew Sias 4758936 BCM212 Assessment 3 REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO

REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

Matthew Sias4758936BCM212

Assessment 3

REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO

Page 2: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

CONTENTSAcknowledgments - Page 1

Introduction - Page 2

Research - Pages 3 - 4

Method - Pages 5 - 8

Results - Pages 9 - 18

Results Summary - Page 19

Conclusion - Page 20

Bibliography - Page 21

Page 3: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThank you to all who participated in the online survey. I truly appreciate you sharing your personal experiences and opinions. Without your input, this research project would not be possible.

Thank you to lecturer Kate Bowles and tutor Susan Maloney for your constant encouragement throughout the course of the semester. Your guidance and feedback have made me a better researcher.

Finally, thank you to my Uncle and Grandmother for inspiring me to pursue this research project. You both fought until the very end and your resilience and strength have made me a stronger person. For that, I am forever grateful.

Page 1

Page 4: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

INTRODUCTIONIn a timespan of just 10 months, I lost both my uncle and grandmother to terminal cancer. My Uncle Baz was diagnosed with bowel cancer in 2011. He fought the disease for almost 5 years, until he lost his battle on April 23rd 2016. My Nan was treated for stage 1 melanoma back in 2015. Just before Christmas last year, she was diagnosed with stage 4 melanoma in her left leg. In under 3 months, the melanoma had spread throughout her body. Unfortunately, my Nan passed away on February 27th 2017.

I have seen first-hand the devastating effects cancer has on both the patient and the people around them. You can’t help but feel helpless knowing that there is no cure for this horrible disease. I remember sitting down with my uncle and discussing ‘the end’. It was a heartbreaking conversation, but one he wanted to have with the family. It is this conversation that has inspired my research proposal for BCM212. I want to know: Should voluntary euthanasia be legalised in Australia?

Personal experience and curiosity have driven me to pursue this topic as I am eager to understand the arguments for and against voluntary euthanasia in Australia. I want to know why people are against medically assisted suicide. If someone is suffering from a terminal illness, why is it illegal for them to end his or her life painlessly and peacefully?

Page 2

Page 5: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

RESEARCHVoluntary euthanasia is “a request by a terminally or incurably ill person for medical assistance to end his or her life painlessly and peacefully. A doctor may administer the medication or prescribe medication that the patient self-administers” (Voluntary Euthanasia Party 2015). The term ‘euthanasia’ is often incorrectly characterised as representing one type of practice. According to the Australian Human Rights Commission, euthanasia is “an umbrella term which covers a vast array of practices that can be described as different forms of euthanasia. These include:

• Passive voluntary euthanasia – when medical treatment is withdrawn or withheld from a patient, at the patient’s request, in order to end the patient’s life;

• Active voluntary euthanasia – when medical intervention takes place, at the patient’s request, in order to end the patient’s life;

• Passive involuntary euthanasia - when medical treatment is withdrawn or withheld from a patient, not at the patient’s request, in order to end the patient’s life;

• Active involuntary euthanasia - when medical intervention takes place, not at the patient’s request, in order to end the patient’s life” (2016).

Currently, “there is no Australian case law dealing specifically with passive voluntary euthanasia” (Cica 1997). As discussed by Cica, the common law in Australia allows competent adult patients to refuse any kind of medical treatment, including treatment necessary to keep the patient alive. However, this right does not extend to children (1997).

Page 3

Page 6: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

RESEARCH CONT.On March 25th 1995, the Northern Territory became the first jurisdiction in the world to pass laws allowing a doctor to end the life of a terminally ill patient and the patient’s request, which permitted both physician-assisted suicide and active voluntary euthanasia in some circumstances. As highlighted by Cica, the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995 (NT) had strict conditions, stating that “it is neither an unqualified ‘license to kill’ nor an unqualified affirmation of a competent adult patient’s right to assistance in dying (1997). On September 22nd 1996, “Australian Bob Dent, terminally ill with prostate cancer, chose to end his own life with the assistance of a physician” becoming the first of four patients to utilize the Act (Pallardy 2011). In 1997, the Act was nullified by the Australian Federal Parliament which passed the Euthanasia Laws Act 1997.

The topic of euthanasia is shrouded with much ethical debate and uncertainty. Advocates argue that people have a right to make their own decisions regarding death, and that euthanasia is “intended to alleviate pain and suffering, hence being ascribed the term ‘mercy killing’” (Ebrahimi 2017). They also believe active euthanasia is not morally worse than the withholding or withdrawal of medical treatment, describing the practice as ‘passive euthanasia’. These views are contested by opponents who argue that euthanasia is equal to murder and abuses human rights. Ebrahimi continues, stating: “that good palliative care can provide relief from suffering to patients and unlike euthanasia, should be the answer in modern medicine” (2017).

Page 4

Page 7: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

METHODTo gather information and public opinion regarding voluntary euthanasia, an online survey was created using ‘SurveyMonkey’. A series of 10 questions were posed to participants to answer at their own discretion. The survey was completely voluntary and participants were asked to give consent for their responses to be published in this report. Participants were asked for consent in Question 10 of the online survey. The survey URL can be found bellow.

Survey URL: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/VCXS3MV

Page 5

Page 8: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

METHOD CONT.The following is a brief introductory post featured on the online survey that outlined the basis of the research project.

Welcome to my survey.

My name is Matthew Sias and I am currently a fourth-year student completing a Bachelor of Creative / Bachelor of Communications and Media Studies at the University of Wollongong.

The following survey is for a research project I am currently undertaking for BCM212 as part of my Communications and Media Studies degree. The survey asks questions regarding the legalisation of voluntary euthanasia in Australia.

For those of you who are unfamiliar with the term, ‘voluntary euthanasia’ is “a request by a terminally or incurably ill person for medical assistance to end his or her life painlessly and peacefully. A doctor may administer the medication or prescribe medication that the patient self-administers” (Voluntary Euthanasia Party 2015). There have been several legislative attempts to legalise voluntary euthanasia in Australia however, at present, it remains illegal.

Personal experience and curiosity have driven me to pursue this topic as I am eager to understand the arguments for and against voluntary euthanasia in Australia.

Please complete all the questions in this survey with as much detail as possible where applicable. However, this survey is optional and all your answers will remain anonymous.

I appreciate your time and assistance with my research project. If you wish to keep up-to-date with my findings, you can visit my WordPress blog (https://mattysias.wordpress.com/) or my Twitter (@mattysias).

Thank you.

Page 6

Page 9: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

METHOD CONT.The following are the 10 questions which were answered by participants. They vary from multiple choice questions to short responses. Questions 1 to 9 are research questions and Question 10 asks participants for consent to use their responses for future research.

Survey Questions:

1. What is your gender?a. Femaleb. Malec. Other

2. What is your age?a. Under 18b. 18 – 25c. 25 – 40 d. 40 – 65e. 65 and over

3. After reading this survey’s introductory extract, what is your understanding of ‘voluntary euthanasia’?a. Excellentb. Very Goodc. Goodd. Faire. Poor

4. Doyousufferfromaterminalillness?a. Yesb. No

Page 7

Page 10: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

METHOD CONT.Survey Questions:

5. Doessomeoneyouknowsuffer/hassufferedfromaterminalillness?a. Yesb. No

6. Do you believe an individual has a right to make their own decisions regarding death?a. Yesb. No

7. If you answered ‘b. No’ for Question 6, please explain why below:

8. Do you think voluntary euthanasia should be legal in Australia?a. Strongly Agreeb. Agreec. Undecidedd. Disagreee. Strongly Disagree

9. If you answered ‘d. Disagree’ or ‘e. Strongly Disagree’ for Question 8, please explain why below:

10. Consent - I consent to completing this survey and having the material I have provided to be used in future research:a. Agreeb. Disagree

Page 8

Page 11: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

RESULTSThe following displays the results of the online survey.

Question 1:

Page 9

Page 12: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

RESULTS CONT.Question 2:

Page 10

Page 13: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

RESULTS CONT.Question 3:

Page 11

Page 14: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

RESULTS CONT.Question 4:

Page 12

Page 15: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

RESULTS CONT.Question 5:

Page 13

Page 16: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

RESULTS CONT.Question 6:

Page 14

Page 17: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

RESULTS CONT.Question 7:

Page 15

Page 18: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

RESULTS CONT.Question 8:

Page 16

Page 19: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

RESULTS CONT.Question 9:

Page 17

Page 20: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

RESULTS CONT.Question 10:

Page 18

Page 21: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

RESULTS SUMMARY• In total there were 56 participants.• 39 females and 17 males completed the online survey.• 73.21% (41) of respondents were aged between 18 to 25 years old.• 39.29% (22) of respondents had a ‘Very Good’ understanding of voluntary

euthanasia after reading the survey’s introductory extract.• 100.00% (56) of participants did not suffer from a terminal illness.• 70.91% (39) of respondents know someone who suffers / has suffered from a

terminal illness. • 94.64% (53) of participants believe an individual has a right to make their own

decisions regarding death. • 50.00% (28) of respondents ‘Strongly Agree’ that voluntary euthanasia should

be legal in Australia. 12.50% (7) of participants were ‘Undecided’ and 1.79% (1) of respondents disagreed.

• 100.00% (56) of participants consented to having the material they have provided to be used in future research.

Page 19

Page 22: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

CONCLUSIONTo conclude, 48 participants who completed the online survey ‘Strongly Agree / Agree’ that voluntary euthanasia should be legal in Australia.

Participants who ‘Disagree’ or ‘Strongly Disagree’ with the legalisation of voluntary euthanasia in Australia responded by discussing the following factors:• Challenges involved in legislation.• Preventing murders from occurring.• Protocols of administering life-ending medication.• Mental wellbeing of those who administer the life-ending medication.• Elimination of patient’s self-worth and dignity. • Mental wellbeing of family members. • Uncertainty of whether the patient’s condition will improve. • A person should die naturally.These responses can be seen in the ‘Results’ section of this report.

After conducting background research and analysing the results of the online survey, I strongly agree that voluntary euthanasia should be legalised in Australia. Witnessing 2 family members lose their lives to terminal illness has also reinforced my opinion. No one should be left to suffer, especially when death is inevitable.

Page 20

Page 23: REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO · REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO. CONTENTS Acknowledgments - Page 1 Introduction - Page 2 Research - Pages 3 - 4 Method - Pages 5 - 8 Results - Pages 9 - 18 Results Summary

BIBLIOGRAPHYAustralian Human Rights Commission 2016, Euthanasia, human rights and the law Issues Paper, Australian Human Rights Commission, viewed 23 April 2017, <https://www.humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/document/publication/2016_AHRC_euthanasia_human_rights_law.pdf>.

Cica, N 1996 – 1997, Euthanasia – the Australian Law in an International Context, Parliament of Australia, Canberra, viewed 23 April 2017, <http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/RP9697/97rp3>.

Cica, N 1996 – 1997, Euthanasia – the Australian Law in an International Context, Parliament of Australia, Canberra, viewed 23 April 2017, <http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/RP9697/97rp4#magic_tag_45>.

Ebrahimi, N 2017, the ethics of euthanasia, Australian Medical Student Journal, weblog post, viewed 23 April 2017, <http://www.amsj.org/archives/2066>.Pallardy, R 2011, Bob Dent Die: The First Legal Voluntary Euthanasia, Encyclopaedia Britannica Blog, weblog post, 22 September, viewed 23 April 2017, <http://blogs.britannica.com/2011/09/bob-dent-dies-legal-voluntary-euthanasia/>.

Voluntary Euthanasia Party 2015, The Issue, viewed 23 April 2017, <http://www.vep.org.au/the_issue>.

Page 21