Upload
clydecooffshore
View
298
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Refund GuaranteesJune 2012
Owen McHugh, Legal Director
Introduction
Kinds of Guarantees
Consequences
Distinguishing Features
Cases
Kinds of Refund Guarantee
On demand bond
Surety “see to it” guarantee
NB No standard practice
Label may mislead
On Demand Bond
L/C
Demand (certificate) Pay
Dispute under SBC
- not relevant
Buyer strong
Bank and Builder exposed
Surety ‘see it’ Guarantee
Bank will pay if Builder
(i) is liable to pay
(ii) fails to pay
Dispute under SBC
- very relevant
Buyer still better off but not as strong
Bank and Builder less exposed
Factors Common to on Demand Bonds and Sureties
Statute of fraud requirements
- in writing - signed by or for guarantor
Within the power of guarantor
Signatory has authority to bind
Not contrary to local law
Implications of on Demand Bond
Label
“Primary obligor not as surety”
Unconditional and irrevocable promise to pay
Paget on Banking:
(i) International
(ii) Issued by bank
(iii) “on demand” / “on first written demand”
(iv) No exclusion of defences
Subject to (ICC) Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees
Certification
Case Law
1. Gold Coast v Ahorros (2002) App Ct
Held: On demand bond
Despite
1. “When the instalment becomes refundable under the SBC” (Arbitration in progress)
2. Clause 5. Variation of SBC will not affect liability under the guarantee
Case Law
1. Gold Coast v Ahorros (2002) App Ct
Tuckey LJ
No standard practice
Paget on Banking indications 1-3 overrode clause 5
Buyer needs money to repay financiers quickly
NB Builder had completed and sold vessels
- but not accounted to Buyer
Case Law
2. Rainy Sky (2011) Supreme Court
Held: Bank was liable where Builder insolvent.
Construction issue; did bank agree to pay “such sums” i.e.
- instalments, or
- sums defined in clause 2 of the guarantee
No dispute that Buyer had a good claim under SBC
Wording ambiguous – most commercial construction
Case Law3. Meritz v Jan de Nul (2011) App Ct
Held: Meritz liable under on demand bond
Despite
1. Insurance Company not a bank
2. “If in connection with the terms of the SBC the Buyer shall become entitled to a refund”
Incorporation of ICC Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees (1992)
On demand bond means:-
Irrelevant if
- Variation of SBC, or - Buyers claim under SBC disputed/wrong
Only issue is whether demand complies.
Summary
No standard practice.
Gold Coast and Meritz lean towards on demand bond
But note commercial factors.
If on demand bond
- Variation of SBC irrelevant
- Does demand satisfy the terms of the bond?
- Dispute under SBC irrelevant
- Buyers can claim under on demand bond even if claim under SBC not justified
Careful drafting essential.
1,400 1st 285 30Lawyers and fee earners worldwide
Law Firm of the Year Legal Business Awards 2011
Partners worldwide Offices across Europe, Americas, Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific
Clyde & Co LLP accepts no responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of material contained in this summary. No part of this summary may be used, reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, reading or otherwise without the prior permission of Clyde & Co LLP. © Clyde & Co LLP 2012
We are always willing to discuss these and other issues affecting offshore contractors. Please contact our leading Offshore Energy Group:
[email protected]://offshore.clydeco.com