Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's
speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you
have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A
Reg A+ Securities Offerings and FAST Act:
Navigating New Rules and Leveraging
Capital Raising Opportunities
Today’s faculty features:
1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 2, 2016
Albert Lung, Of Counsel, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, Palo Alto, Calif.
Robert R. Kaplan, Jr., Kaplan Voekler Cunningham & Frank, Richmond, Va.
Brenda Hamilton, Esq., Hamilton & Associates Law Group, Boca Raton, Fla.
Tips for Optimal Quality
Sound Quality
If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality
of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet
connection.
If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial
1-888-450-9970 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please
send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can
address the problem.
If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance.
Viewing Quality
To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen,
press the F11 key again.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Continuing Education Credits
In order for us to process your continuing education credit, you must confirm your
participation in this webinar by completing and submitting the Attendance
Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar.
A link to the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation will be in the thank you email
that you will receive immediately following the program.
For additional information about continuing education, call us at 1-800-926-7926
ext. 35.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Program Materials
If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please
complete the following steps:
• Click on the ^ symbol next to “Conference Materials” in the middle of the left-
hand column on your screen.
• Click on the tab labeled “Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a
PDF of the slides for today's program.
• Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open.
• Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Reg A+ Securities Offerings and FAST Act: Navigating New Rules and Leveraging Capital Raising Opportunities Robert R. Kaplan Jr. March 2, 2016
Offer Name/Filing
Name
Date
Initial
Filing
Sponsor
Gross Offering
Amt
Distributing Party
(Broker/Underwriter)
Status Amount
Raised
Industry Market
Sun Dental
Holdings, LLC
9/3/15 Minimum of
$5MM; maximum
of $20MM Class
A Common Units
VRA Partners, LLC, as Placement
Agent: $50K retainer + 4.5%
commission on aggregate units sold.
Intention to supplement with non-
commissioned “crowdfunding
platforms” (Internet-based)
Qual
12/1/15
Unclear Medical Device - Dental No current plans to list
Allegiancy, LLC 9/3/15
(follow-on
from
2013
offering)
All or nothing for
$30MM of
Common Stock
W.R. Hambrecht & Co.
Amend 3 None Real Estate Asset Management
Services
OTCQX
AWA Group, LP 6/26/15 Minimum of
$20MM,
maximum of
$50MM of Class
A Common Units
Issuer selling Qual
1/25/16
Unclear PE – Purchase RIA Firms No current plans to list
Aperion Biologics,
Inc.
9/21/15 $25M W.R. Hambrecht & Co. Amend 9
1/19/16
None Medical Device – Human Tissue NASDAQ Capital Markets
Coastal Financial
Corporation
8/24/15 Merger and share
exchange
None 1-Z Merger
complete
Bank Holding Company None yet
GoChip Inc. 7/6/15 Up to $20MM
Class B Common
Stock
Issuer selling Amend 2 None Digital entertainment No plans
Elio Motors, Inc. 8/28/15 $12.6MM
minimum,
$25.08MM
maximum of
Common Stock
Issuer Selling Qual
11/20/15
@$17MM Auto OTCQX
Sprinter Football
Club, Inc.
9/3/15 $20MM maximum Issuer selling Amend 3 None Soccer club Unclear
Groundfloor
Finance Inc..
3/23/15 Constantly
increasing as
projects are
added
Issuer selling
Qual
2/5/16
$1,808,000 Real Estate Development –Series
of Limited recourse obligations for
each property (single family)
None – short term debt
StepOne Personal
Health Inc.
5/6/14 $10MM
maximum; $1MM
minimum of 9%
Convertible
Preferred Stock
Issuer selling
Qual
12/31/15
Unclear Online Medical Technology Listing or additional offering in 12
months
ralliBox Inc. 8/12/15 $3MM Issuer selling Qual
11/2/15
Unclear Internet platform for e-commerce Unclear
6
Alternative
Securities Markets
Group Corporation
3/20/15 $20M maximum
(Debt
Instruments)
Issuer selling
Amend 1
8/13/15
None Financial Services – Create
ASMX exchange
None
Tuscan Gardens
Secured Income
Fund LLC
6/22/15 $50MM
maximum
aggregate
(Series of
Preferred for
each property)
Issuer selling Amend
9/29/15
(Series C)
None Real Estate – Senior Housing Repayment upon sale of property
in 5 to 7 years
Weed Real Estate
Inc.
6/29/15 $1.25MM
Issuer selling Amend 5
1/28/16
None Real Estate - acquire and lease
growing space and related facilities
to licensed marijuana growers and
dispensary owners for their
operation
OTCQB
Beautykind
Holding, Inc.
2/5/15 $10MM W.R. Hambrecht + Co., LLC Initial filing None Beauty products OTCQX
Coastal Banking
Co. Inc.
Merger
Chicago Housing
REIT, Inc.
1/27/16 $20MM (9%
Debt)
Issuer selling Initial filing None Real Estate – single and multi-
family
Listing or additional offering in 12
months
CF Fund II, LLC
(withdrawn)
Withdraw
San Carlos Resort,
LLC
1/7/16 $20MM (Series
Debt)
Issuer selling Initial filing None Real Estate – Hotel development None
Virtuix Holdings
Inc.
1/4/16 $15MM
(Preferred
Convertible into
Common)
SeedInvest Amend 5
1/29/16
None Virtual reality device None
GK Investment
Holdings, LLC
12/23/15 GK
Developmen
t
$50MM
(Unsecured 7%)
JCC Advisors Initial
Filing
None Real estate investment – Existing
income producing properties
None
Hamilton National
Income Trust, Inc.
12/21/15 $50MM Common Issuer selling Initial
Filing
None Mortgage REIT None
Hunting Dog
Capital Corp
12/22/15 $50MM W.R. Hambrecht + Co., LLC Amend 1
12/23/15
None PE – Investments in middle market
companies
NASDAQ Capital Market
Advanced
Predictive
Analytics Holding,
Inc.
12/17/15` $10MM
Promissory Notes
Issuer selling Amend 1
1/29/16
None Software analytics None
Boxx Corp 12/17/15 $10MM 9% Issuer selling Initial
Filing
None Electric scooters None
Fundrise Equity
REIT, LLC
12/15/15 Rise
Companies
$50MM Common Issuer selling Qual
1/5/15
Unclear REIT – Diverse assets Liquidity transaction in 5 years
Planters Holding
Co
12/7/15 Merger Qual
12/30/15
XTI Aircraft Co 12/10/15 $20MM Common Issuer selling Qual
1/21/16
Unclear Aircraft – verticle takeoff plane None
Stack-It Storage
Inc.
12/10/15 Caprock Oil $6.4 MM Unclear Amend 3
2/4/16
None Self-Storage OTC Pink
Streetshares, Inc. 12/4/15 $50MM Notes Issuer selling Amend 5
2/5/16
None Online loan marketplace None
7
Advantameds
Solutions USA
Fund I, Inc.
11/6/15 $20M Issuer selling Qual
1/14/16
None To acquire controlling interests
in 4 Development Companies
None
Fundrise Real
Estate Investment
Trust, Inc.
11/3/15 $50MM Issuer selling Qual
11/24/15
$16.9MM Mortgage REIT None
Medalist
Diversified REIT,
Inc.
10/5/15 $30MM Moloney Securities Initial
Filing
None Equity REIT OTC
Waybetter, Inc. 1/15/16 $20MM Series B
Preferred
Issuer selling Initial
Filing
None Health games None
Great Coin, Inc. 11/10/15 $50MM Issuer selling Amend 1
12/31/15
None Software – Digital currency ATS
Punch TV Studios
Inc.
10/26/15 $50MM Issuer selling Amend 4
2/8/16
None Studio development None
Chameleon Media
Group Inc.
5/15/15 $20MM Issuer selling Amend 1
10/23/15
None Film and TV program development None
CMX Gold & Silver
Corp
10/23/15 $450,000 Issuer selling Qual
2/3/16
Unclear Develop silver mine Canadian Stock Exchange
8
Keys to Reg A
Not limited to Accredited General solicitation allowed Trading markets developing for liquidity Transparency with ongoing reporting Access equals delivery for sales
9
Two “Tiers” of Regulation A offerings Tier 1 – consists of those offerings already covered by Regulation A, or offerings of up to $20 million in a trailing 12-month period, including up to $6 million for the account of selling security-holders. Tier 2 – offerings of up to $50 million in a trailing 12-month period, including up to $15 million for the account of selling security-holders.
10
Eligible issuers:
Companies organized in and with their principal place of business in the United States or Canada
Not eligible:
– Are already SEC reporting companies or Investment Companies, including BDC’s.
– “Blank Check” Companies.
– Have not filed the ongoing reports required by the proposed rules during the preceding two years (if required to).
– Are or have been subject to a Commission order revoking the company’s registration under the Exchange Act during the preceding five years.
– Are disqualified under the proposed 506 “bad actor” disqualification rules.
11
Eligible Securities
BROAD! no asset-backed securities or fractional undivided interests in oil, gas, or other mineral rights.
12
Investment limitation:
Non-accredited’s: 10% of the greater of the investor’s net worth or annual salary on a “per offering” basis. No limitation for accredited’s or where list on National Exchange. Issuers may rely on investor representations to comply.
13
“Testing the Waters”:
Testing the waters solicitation materials may be used before and after initial filing; Old Reg A required that cease using once initial filing made. After initial filing, must include preliminary offering circular OR notice as to where it can be obtained – URL to EDGAR filing suffices. Testing waters solicitation materials need not be filed prior to first use, but filed as exhibit to initial filing or non-public submission.
14
- Annual report with audited financials - Semi-annual report with unaudited financials - Analog to 8k for changes fundamental to business
Issuer Reporting:
15
Rule 15c2-11:
Tier 2 reporting would meet BD’s 15c2-11 obligations of information for publishing quotation for securities not listed on national securities exchange. Rule 12(g):
Carveout for Tier II, if: - Current in reporting - Section 17 Transfer Agent - Float/Revenue limitations
16
State Pre-emption: TIER 2 ARE ENTIRELY EXEMPT!!!!! * Some states require agent/BD registered in that state
NASAA has proposed a standard 50 State Notice filing regime for comment Does not cover secondary. So, how?:
The fact is that a variety of exemptions exist under state laws for secondary activity. 42 states have adopted some form of the “manual exemption,” and virtually every state has iterations of one or more exemptions for secondary activity not for the benefit of the issuer that does not constitute arbitrage activity.
17
1401 E. Cary Street | Richmond, VA | 23219 www.kv-legal.com
18
Secondary Trading Considerations
20
• Post-offering liquidity and secondary trading market is a key consideration.
• OTC Market versus NASDAQ/NYSE
– Regulation A does not provide preemption for secondary trading. Unlike NASDAQ, OTC securities are
not “covered securities” and companies must apply for manual exemptions.
– NASDAQ and OTC listing requirements
• OTC Market: Three primary tiers: (1) OTCQX; (2) OTCQB; (3) OTCPINK
– Qualification standards such as minimum bid price, market cap and other financial and liquidity criteria.
– Financial Reporting: Regulation A+ Reporting is sufficient for OTCQB, but OTCQX requires additional
quarterly reports: Rule 144 and Rule 15c2-11 considerations.
– OTCQX requires PCAOB registered auditors (although not PCAOB audit standard)
• NASDAQ Listing:
– Additional disclosures in the Form 1-A, except for financial statements.
– Listing Qualifications: Public float requirement
– PCAOB Audit
– Form 8-A: Must be filed with 5 days of qualification of Form 1-A
Regulation A+ Marketing Strategies
• Combination of Testing the Water Communications (TTW) and formal roadshows.
– Consumer/Customer based offering—marketing to existing customers as potential investor,
particularly internet companies.
• Regulation A+ TTW provides more flexibility to TTW under Title I IPO on ramp: Not
restricted to QIB and institutional accredited investors.
• Unlike TTW under Title I, all Regulation A+ TTW materials must be filed with the SEC “as
an exhibit” to the Form 1-A.
– TTW encompasses a large categories of materials.
– Review content for consistency and accuracy.
– No need to file multiple slide decks if they are substantively the same as materials
previously filed.
– SEC is focused on reviewing TTW materials
– Best practices: forward looking statement; written script; no broad distribution of
materials at investor meetings.
• Distinctions between TTW and roadshow—unclear but may be relevant in terms of
disclosures.
21
Regulation A+ IPO Timeline (Tier 2 Offering) (4 to 5 months)
22
Pre-Filing Period Post-Filing and Waiting
Period Marketing and
Roadshow Qualification/Closing
• Organize the team: auditors, attorneys, underwriters, consultants and internal resources
• Determine structure of offering
• Complete financial statements (audit requirements)
• Prepare and draft Form 1-A • Complete substantially all
business, legal and financial due diligence
• First SEC Comment Letter within 27 days of filing
• File Amendments to Form 1-A (typically 2-3 amendments)
• Conduct TTW meetings • Prepare marketing
materials • Apply for NASDAQ/OTC • Negotiate and complete
underwriting agreement
• Resolve all material comments with SEC and NASDAQ
• Complete FINRA review if applicable.
• Conduct roadshow or commence formal marketing efforts
• Confirm NASDAQ and OTC applications are approved
• File “request to qualify” within 2 business days of qualification.
• Price upon qualification and close transaction.
• Trading in secondary markets begin.
6 to 8 weeks 4 to 6 weeks 2 to 3 weeks If continuous offering, 30 to 60 days before closing
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4
Form 1-A: Process and Disclosure Issues
• Form 1-A generally follows the traditional S-1 process:
– No filing fees are required
– SEC review process is streamlined;
– Response letter filed on EDGAR
– More flexibility in the review process with SEC examiner; and
• Financial Statement requirements
– Instead of the 135-day stale period, Form 1-A provide a 9-month period.
• Ability to use to use “Offering Circular Supplement” for omission of
pricing and other information under Rule 430A prior to qualification
– 20% Safe harbor for upsizing and downsizing transaction without recirculation.
– Cannot change the number of shares disclosed in the offering statement
23
Legal Liabilities to Officer and Directors
• There are two basic provisions under federal securities laws that are implicated
by a Regulation A+ Offering:
– Section 17: Antifraud provision typically reserved for SEC enforcement action.
– No Section 11 liability but Section 12(a)(2) liability: Strict liability for materially misleading
information in Form 1-A
– no need to allege or prove intent or scienter or reliance
– No need to prove direct causation that sales would not have occurred if plaintiff knew the statement
– The mis-statements include both Form 1-A and any oral communications
– Officers, directors and controlled persons are liable.
• State law: fiduciary duty issues.
• Due diligence defense for underwriters.
• Practical considerations
24
ASIA
Almaty
Astana
Beijing
Singapore
Tokyo
EUROPE
Brussels
Frankfurt
London
Moscow
Paris
MIDDLE EAST
Dubai
NORTH AMERICA
Boston
Chicago
Dallas
Harrisburg
Hartford
Houston
Los Angeles
Miami
New York
Orange County
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Princeton
San Francisco
Santa Monica
Silicon Valley
Washington, DC
Wilmington
25
Reg A+ Securities Offerings and FAST Act Webinar
Brenda Hamilton, Esq. [email protected] Hamilton & Associates Law Group, P.A. Securities Attorney March 2, 2016
Prospective For Underwriters & Broker-Dealers: Due Diligence Considerations
Unlike for traditional Initial Public Offerings (“IPOs”), there is no potential liability for issuers under Section 11 of the Securities Act in connection with Regulation A+ offerings. Sellers in Regulation A+ offerings are potentially liable under Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act for materially misleading statements in the offering circular or in oral communications. Accordingly, the potential Securities Act liability of issuers under a Regulation A+ offering is less than in connection with a Rule 506 offering but greater than in connection with an IPO. As such, underwriters and broker-dealers participating in a Regulation A+ offering should require a level of due diligence and disclosure comparable to that of offerings registered with the Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Tier I and Tier II offerings will be subject to review by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), if broker-dealers participate in the Regulation A+ offering. Under FINRA Rule 5110(b)(1), no FINRA member or associated person may participate in a public offering unless the offering has been filed with and reviewed by FINRA. In addition, FINRA Rule 5110(b)(9)(G) specifically includes securities offered pursuant to Regulation A+ as a public offering that must be filed with FINRA. Offering materials will be subject to FINRA comment and review, which includes a thorough assessment of the underwriting terms and arrangements. Proper due diligence will help ensure a smooth FINRA comment process.
27
Benefits and Costs: Comparison with Conventional IPOs v. Regulation D Private Placements
The costs associated with third party advisors, such as the issuer’s securities attorney and auditor, will be lower in a Regulation A offering than an IPO. Since disclosure requirements are less than that of an IPO, management will be required to devote less time to the preparation of the Form 1-A offering circular. A registration statement on Form S-1 is typically subject to full review by the SEC staff in connection with an issuer’s IPO. While the review process undertaken by SEC staff in a Regulation A+ offering will be generally shorter than the review and comment process in a registration statement. Generally, issuers will provide fewer disclosures than a Regulation A offering to investors in a private placement offering. As such, the cost of a private placement are typically less than an IPO or Regulation A offering.
28
• Regulation A+ requires less extensive disclosure documents unless the issuer uses the simplified
Exchange Act registration procedure. • Regulation A+ is generally less expensive because of scaled down disclosure requirements. • Regulation A+ is potentially faster than an IPO because of reduced disclosures and faster SEC
review. • There are no ongoing reporting requirements for Regulation A+ as Tier 1 offerings and Tier 2
offerings have scaled down on disclosure requirements. The advantages of an IPO compared to Regulation A+ are: • There are no limitations on the amounts that can be raised in an IPO. Regulation A+ contains the
Tier 1 and Tier 2 offering amount limitations. • There are no limitations on purchases by non-accredited investors in an IPO. Tier 2 Regulation
A+ offerings are subject to the investment limitation provisions.
29
Comparison with Conventional IPOs v. Regulation D Private Placements
• The IPO provisions require less public disclosure of solicitation materials for emerging growth companies.
• Issuers have the benefit of information in Schedules 13D and 13G that are not required in Regulation A+ offerings.
Regulation A+ provides a potentially faster and less expensive method of going public than a traditional IPO. There are limitations on the amounts that can be raised and in Tier 2 offerings on investments by any non-accredited investors. The ongoing reporting requirements in Tier 2 offerings are scaled down from those for SEC reporting companies. According to the SEC, Regulation 506 is used more than any other exemption from registration. Rule 506 provides two distinct exemptions: • Rule 506(b) is a traditional private placement, where general solicitation is prohibited and the
offering can include up to 35 non-accredited investors and an unlimited number of accredited investors.
• In Rule 506(c) offerings the issuer may use general solicitation so long as it verifies that all
purchasers are accredited investors.
30
Comparison with Conventional IPOs v. Regulation D Private Placements
The advantages of Regulation A+ in comparison to Rule 506 offerings includes: • Securities issued in Regulation A+ offerings are not “restricted securities.” Securities issued in a
Rule 506 offerings are restricted securities. The potential for a secondary trading market after a Regulation A+ offering are far greater than a Regulation A offering.
• In Regulation A+ offerings, securities can be offered to the general public using general
solicitation. While general solicitation is allowed under Rule 506(c), sales can only be made if the issuer takes reasonable steps to verify that the purchasers are accredited investors. Rule 506(b) does not allow general solicitation.
• Issuers are not required to use reasonable methods to verify accredited investor status in Tier 2
Regulation A+ offerings. Unlike Rule 506(c), issuers in a Regulation A+ offering can rely on purchaser self-certification unless the issuer has actual knowledge that the purchaser’s self-certification is incorrect.
• There is no limit to the number of non-accredited investors in a Regulation A+ offering. Rule 506(c) does not allow sales to non-accredited investors. In Rule 506(b) offerings, only 35 non-accredited investors can be purchasers.
Comparison with Conventional IPOs v. Regulation D Private Placements
31
The advantages of Rule 506 over Regulation A+ are the following: • There are no limitations on the amounts that can be raised under Rule 506. Regulation A+ offerings
are subject to the Tier 1 and Tier 2 caps.
• Rule 506 always preempts state securities registration requirements other than notice filings and anti-fraud provisions. Tier 1 Regulation A+ offerings are subject to state securities registration requirements.
• There are no mandatory disclosure provisions if sales are made only to accredited investors. Regulation A+ contains substantial various disclosure requirements.
• The SEC does not review the offering documents is a Rule 506(c) offering. Regulation A+ offerings like registration statement documents, are required to be filed with and are subject to, review and comments by the SEC. Additionally, Tier 1 offerings are subject to review by state regulators.
• Rule 506 does not impose ongoing reporting obligations while Regulation A+ Tier 2 offerings impose ongoing reporting obligations.
32
Comparison with Conventional IPOs v. Regulation D Private Placements
33
What Companies Should Do To Prepare For A Regulation A+ Offering Planning ahead for a Regulation A+ offering will prevent common pitfalls that issuers encounter
during the securities offering process.
The most important step in planning ahead for issuers planning a Regulation A+ offering is to understand the exemption’s requirements and limitations.
Issuers should consider the cost they will incur in conducting their Regulation A+ offering, complying
with ongoing reporting obligations and costs associated with public company status. Along with the IPO’s transactional fees and costs for underwriters, SEC registration, FINRA filing, legal counsel and accountants, there are also listing and transfer agent fees. After a Regulation A+ Tier 2 offering, there are ongoing public reporting costs and associated professional fees.
Issuers should define their business strategy and identify their future plans. Issuers should get their house in order including compiling their unaudited financial statements and
getting their corporate book updated.
Issuers should ensure they have sufficient management in place to deal with the capital raising process and associated disclosure obligations.
Issuers should decide whether they will conduct their offering or use the services of an underwriter
Issuers should address how investors will have an exit strategy after the Regulation A offering.
Regulation A provides for multiple structures and issuers should decide whether their goal is to have their securities publicly traded after their Regulation A Offering.
• Before closing the Regulation A offering, the issuer should ensure it meets the requirements for
obtaining a ticker symbol if it plans to go public. Companies not meeting the requirements of listing on a national securities exchange, must meet FINRA’s requirements for a ticker symbol assignment. For companies seeking to be quoted on the OTC Markets, the issuer should have at least 25 shareholders who paid cash consideration for their shares and which own at least 500 shares of a company’s stock each. The issuer should also ensure it can locate a sponsoring market maker to sponsor its Form 211 application with FINRA.
• A transfer agent is the custodian of the company’s shareholder records, including purchases, sales, transfers and account balances. After a going public transaction, as the company’s securities begin to trade actively, it becomes critical to have efficient transfer agent operations. Setting up transfer agency early, and then issuing and shipping shares to initial subscribing shareholders is a formality that helps avoid confusion and extra burdens for the issuer.
34
FAST Act: Title LXXI
-Reduce from 21 to 15 number of days between filing and roadshow.
- EGC which loses status after filing or confidential submission, will be treated as EGC until earlier of IPO closing or one year after lose of status.
- Omission of certain historical financial information otherwise required by SX
35
FAST Act: Title LXXVI
New Safe Harbor for “4(1)(1/2)”: - Only accredited’s
- No general solicitation
- Information requirements
- Affiliate disclosure
- Bad Actor prohibition
- Subsidiary disqualification
- Must be engaged in business
- Cannot be used for unsold allotment
- Must be outstanding at least 90 days
- Covered securities
36