Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Regarding Chairs:
Regarding Chairpersons, Directors, Coordinators, etc. The faculty awarded department heads a 3.91
(±0.01) overall mean.
Twenty two departments out of 46 had rating averages above 4.0 and as high as 4.99 (for the Department
of Public Relations).
The leaders of the following units earned high ratings on all 16 dimensions:
1 AG-AGCO - Fraze
2 AG-NRM - Wallace
3 AS-HIST - Cunningham
4 AS-PSY - Morgan
5 AS-SASW - Houk
6 BA-FIN - Mercer
7 HS-CFAS - Shumway
8 MC-PR - Seltzer
9 VPA-MUSIC - Ballenger
Another five departments had 15 of the 16 questions averaging at or above 4.0.
1 AG-PSS - Hequet
2 AS-PHIL - Webb
3 BA-ACCT - Ricketts
4 HS-PFP - Hampton
5 MC-MCOM - Ott
Another three departments had 14 of the 16 questions at or above 4.0
1 AS-MATH - Toda
2 BA-MGT - Fried
3 HS-DOD - Parkinson
Actively promotes research and scholarly excellence earned 25 of 46 units had a 4.0 rating or better and 21
rating in the Mid-level ratings resulting into none of the ratings below 3.0.
Actively promotes teaching excellence is the best characteristic overall. This earned 29 of 46 units had a 4.0
rating or better. Although actively promotes teaching excellence has the best score it has earned one rating
below 3.0 from EN- CS, Hewett.
Strategic planning was the most common weakness of department leaders and this earned 8 rating below
3.00. And the second one is administering in a transparent manner earned 6 rating below 3.0.
Out of 46 ratings only two departments earned below 3.0.
1 AR-AR - Ellis
2 EN-CS - Hewett
Question data for all the Chairs by Evaluator:
Chairs by all Faculty Response Rate 593 (41.9%)
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
Mean Evaluation Scores of all Chairs by all Faculty
0
75
150
225
300
1 2 3 4 5
1. Research & Scholarship
0
75
150
225
300
1 2 3 4 5
2.Teaching Excellence
0
75
150
225
300
1 2 3 4 5
3. Institinl. & Public service
0
75
150
225
300
1 2 3 4 5
4. Represents
0
75
150
225
300
1 2 3 4 5
5 .Responsive Fac Interest
0
75
150
225
300
1 2 3 4 5
6. Seeks Fac input
0
75
150
225
300
1 2 3 4 5
7. Supports Fac devel
0
75
150
225
300
1 2 3 4 5
8. Promotion & Tenure
0
75
150
225
300
1 2 3 4 5
9. Promotes Diversity
0
75
150
225
300
1 2 3 4 5
10. Inspires Confidence
0
75
150
225
300
1 2 3 4 5
11. Fair and rigorous
0
75
150
225
300
1 2 3 4 5
12. Strategic plan
0
75
150
225
300
1 2 3 4 5
13. Financial Mgmt
0
75
150
225
300
1 2 3 4 5
14. Open and transparent
0
75
150
225
300
1 2 3 4 5
15. Effective Staff
0
75
150
225
300
1 2 3 4 5
16. Promotes cooperation
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
12345
ALL Questions
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
Mean Evaluation Scores - All Chair and Other Mid-level Administrators in the College of Arts and Sciences by Faculty
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
Mean Evaluation Scores - All Chair and Other Mid-level Administrators in the College of Agricultral Science and Natural Resources by Faculty
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
Mean Evaluation Scores - All Chair and Other Mid-level Administrators in the College of Architecture by Faculty
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
Mean Evaluation Scores - All Chair and Other Mid-level Administrators in the Rawls College of Business by Faculty
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
Mean Evaluation Scores - All Chair and Other Mid-level Administrators in the College of Education by Faculty
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
Mean Evaluation Scores - All Chair and Other Mid-level Administrators in the College of Engineering by Faculty
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
Mean Evaluation Scores - All Chair and Other Mid-level Administrators in the College of Human Sciences by Faculty
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
Mean Evaluation Scores - All Chair and Other Mid-level Administrators in the Library by Faculty
This concludes the Executive Summary.
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
Mean Evaluation Scores - All Chair and Other Mid-level Administrators in the College of Media and Communication by Faculty
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
Mean Evaluation Scores - All Chair and Other Mid-level Administrators in the College of Visual and Performing Arts by Faculty
![[XLS]kanplas.comkanplas.com/wp-content/uploads/Transfer-to-Reserve-2016... · Web view1 95 3724 100 150 150 180 180 180 90 405 225 225 3 2 143 770 100 150 150 180 180 180 90 405 225](https://img.pdfslide.net/doc/110x75/5b1f43827f8b9a8a3a8c7c3b/xls-web-view1-95-3724-100-150-150-180-180-180-90-405-225-225-3-2-143-770-100.jpg)
