Upload
jemimah-york
View
218
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Region 10 Accountability and Assessment Updates
March 07, 2014Jana Schreiner, Accountability and
State Assessment Consultant
Agenda, Webinar #7
• Double Testing• Accountability
– Federal • Priority/Focus/Reward• 1003(a) grant• Federal Report Card
– State • Final decisions in March• DVM
• Assessment– Questions from the field
DOUBLE TESTING
Two letters…
• Press release• TAA letter• To Administrator Addressed letter gives more
information….
Bottom line…
• No incentive to double test• Commissioner discourages double testing• Algebra I score will count at campus where
student tests• No plans to count as non-participants
Lingering Question
• SSI?
FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY
SIP
Title I, 1003(a) Priority and Focus School Grant • Application
– Scheduled to open in eGrants on 2-13-14– Closing date in eGrants 3-17-14– Amendment deadline 6-16-14– Grant ends on 9-30-14
• Allocations– Non-TTIPS Priority Schools $160,000– Focus Schools $20,000
Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.
8
NCLB Report Card
• Renamed• Different timeline this year
Questions?
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY
2014 Developmenthttp://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2014/materials.html
• ATAC preliminary recommendations—with targets…this posted 02/28/14
• Final decisions in March… the “end” of March
Performance Based Monitoring
Data Validation Monitoring
Staging for DVM-Leavers was posted in ISAM on Friday, January 31, 2014.
Staging for DVM-Discipline will be posted during the week of February 20th.
DVM-State Assessment reports were released to districts on February 21st. Staging is coming.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.
13
• Districts at stage 3 or 4 will submit all interventions activities and documents, including supporting documentation and the improvement/corrective action plan, to TEA on or before April 9, 2014.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.
14
DVM-Leavers and Discipline
Performance Based Monitoring
Important to Remember
Key difference between
DVM And PBM
PBMAS indicators yield a definitive result.
DVM suggests an anomaly that needs to be reviewed to determine whether the anomalous data are accurate--- raising a red flag
Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.
15
DVM-Student Assessment
• Student assessment data validation indicators have been implemented annually since 2005 (except for 2011).
• The 2013 student assessment data validation indicators are very similar to previous years’ indicators, with some minor changes.– A new indicator has been added
Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.
16
DVM-Student Assessment
• STAAR 3-8 Absent and “Other”– These are accountability system safeguard
indicators that are aligned with the student groups included in the state accountability system’s student performance results.
– They evaluate all subject areas.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.
17
ASSESSMENT
Q: Are online TELPAS Reading rosters considered confidential & secure materials before or after proctor caching? (It lists PEIMS numbers and user id before proctor caching & adds authorization codes after). A: Yes to both.
Q: If a student’s years in schools was reported incorrectly last year, can we make a correction? This is not a recalculation based on 60 day rule, but a clerical error that that we’d like to resolve.A: Per TEA, you cannot correct last year, but enter the correct years this year and keep local documentation.
Q: A student eligible for special provisions has retested twice in English 1 EOC’s. However, the student has not earned credit for the 1st half of English 1 yet. Should the student retest in English 1 EOC once credit for the class has been earned (during fall 2014)?A: Since part of the provision is passing the class, the student would retest in the fall, after which (assuming credit is earned) he/she can take advantage of the provision and no longer retest.
Q: Where can we find the percentage of passing for new EOC English tests at Level 2 satisfactory (phase-in 1)?A: It is not yet postedQ: Are the compositions being graded by 2 scorers? If so, how are they arriving at the 1-4 score for students?A: Yes, two scorers. See next slides.
STAAR Writing Rubric
Score Point 1—VERY LIMITED
Score Point 2—BASIC
Score Point 3—SATISFACTORY
Score Point 4—ACCOMPLISHED
Teachers and students need to have anin-depth understanding of the writing rubric for each type of writing!
21
Scoring Model for STAAR
22
SCORE 1 SCORE 2
SUMMED
SCORE CSR RATING
0 0 0 Nonscorable Performance1 1 2 Very Limited Performance1 2 3 Between Very Limited and Basic Performance2 2 4 Basic Performance2 3 5 Between Basic and Satisfactory Performance3 3 6 Satisfactory Performance3 4 7 Between Satisfactory and Accomplished Performance4 4 8 Accomplished Performance