50
"Regional Results of Volunteer River and Stream MonitoringButler County Stream Team4 Lower Great Miami Citizens’ Water Quality Monitoring1 Saturday Stream Snapshot by Greenacres2 Mill Creek Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring3 Annual Meeting of the OKI Regional Conservation Council April 5, 2017, at Sharon Centre in Sharon Woods We monitor 300+ sites monthly for nine months each year using similar methods on the same day, the 2 nd and 3 rd Saturday of each month. Michael C. Miller 1 , Anne Lyon 2 , Emma Clohessy 3 , Bob Lentz 4, and John Mangan 5

Regional Results of Volunteer River and Stream Monitoringrcc.oki.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Regional...Hach 8160 & USEPA 2510-B 0.01 µS/cm with 2 digits +/-0.01 µS/cm 0.01 -200,000

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • "Regional Results of Volunteer River

    and Stream Monitoring”

    Butler County Stream Team4

    Lower Great Miami Citizens’ Water Quality Monitoring1

    Saturday Stream Snapshot by Greenacres2

    Mill Creek Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring3

    Annual Meeting of the OKI Regional Conservation CouncilApril 5, 2017, at Sharon Centre in Sharon Woods

    We monitor 300+ sites monthly for nine months each year using similar methods on the

    same day, the 2nd and 3rd Saturday of each month.

    Michael C. Miller1, Anne Lyon2, Emma Clohessy3, Bob Lentz4, and John Mangan5

  • Greater Cincinnati inside I-275 Interstate Loop is Drained by 4

    Rivers and their flood plains.

    Great Miami R.

    Whitewater R.

    Mill Creek

    Little

    Miami R.

    Licking River

    Here are the rivers we monitor in 5 counties and two states of Greater Cincinnati

  • Best Studied Metro Area in CountryI. Municipal Sewer District as part of their Consent Decree

    has had Midwest Biodiversity Institute do ‘stage of the art’

    physical, chemical and biological assessment sampling of

    the MC in 2011(76 sites), LMR in 2012 (111 sites), GMR in

    2013(62 sites), Ohio R and its tributaries including Taylor

    Creek in 2014 (45 sites). These will be repeated in 5 years

    to document impacts of Consent Decree upgrades of CSOs

    & SSOs.

    II. Green Umbrella inaugurates ‘StreamBank Regional Water

    Quality Database’ containing the chemical water quality of

    300 sites monthly in Hamilton, Butler, Warren and

    Clermont Counties for 2015. The base will soon have 2016

    and data from previous years.

    Only NSF Long

    Term Ecological R

    sites in Baltimore

    and Phoenix

    many have

    better.

  • Combined and Sanitary Sewer Overflows

    must be mitigated by MSD & SD1Most are along the Mill Creek and Duck Ck in Ohio and along the Licking in KY

  • Metropolitan Sewer District funded biosurveys

    by Midwest Biodiversity Institute at 294 sites

    2011-2014 using OEPA methods gives a definitive

    survey every 5 years

    http://msdgc.org/initiatives/water_quality/aboutwebmap.html

  • Four Volunteer Monitoring

    Programs in StreamBank

    collect monthly data from >

    300 sites in greater Metro

    Cincinnati.

    http://www.greenumbrella.org/StreamB

    ank-Database

    Little Miami

    River

    Upper Great

    Miami River

    Lower

    Great

    Miami R

    Mill

    Creek

  • Stream Team Member Manual Muskingum R.pdf

    AlgaeNitrate

    PO4-P

    Turbidity

    pH

    Photosynthesis increases

    HCO3����CO2 + OH- O2

  • Our home for the Great Miami River Volunteer

    Water Quality Monitoring Program, the U.C.

    Center for Field Studies 11053 Oxford Rd,

    MWWL Great Park We monitor 8 parameters from 80+ sites monthly for 9 months on 2 nd

    Saturday.1. E. Coli bacteria/coliforms2. Total Phosphorus3. Nitrate-Nitrogen4. Conductivity5. Turbidity6. pH7. Optical Whiteners8. In vivo Chlorophyll a

  • Total Phosphorus

    Digestion

    Total P with DR4000

    Nitrate-N with DR3000

    Conductivity &

    Turbidity

    Sample labelling & chain of Custody

    Lower Great Miami River Crew at U.C. Center for Field Studies

  • Each laboratory uses

    skilled volunteers

    and EPA approved

    methods.

    Nitrate with HACH TNT

    Bacterial Petri

    Dishes with Coli24

    pH foregroiund & Chlorophyll + Optical

    Whitners bacground

    Conductivity

    Lower Great Miami River Crew at U.C. Center for Fie ld Studies

  • Little Miami River Saturday Stream Snapshot at Greenacres

    Our director and originatorAnne Lyon

    Samples ready for analysis

    Nitrate analysisE. Coli & coliformanalysis

  • Little Miami River Saturday Stream Snapshot

    Conductivity and pHSample Check-in

    Chain of Custordy

    Total Phosphorus volume adjustmentTotal Phosphorus Digestion

  • Butler County Stream Team works out of a Miami Uni versity Lab

    Total Phosphorus Digestion

    Conductivity testingWater collection team

    Nitrate Determination

  • Annual Data Report to Volunteers

    and interested parties with brunch

  • Where can you find our data?StreamBank https://www.greenumbrella.org/StreamBank-Database

    Great Miami River Watershed

    1 Upper GMR http://www.butlercountystreamteam.org/ Bob Lentz

    2 Lower GMR http://riversunlimited.org/wqm/data.htm Lisa Link

    3 Little Miami River Watershed Anne Lyonhttp://www.green-acres.org/index.php/education/water-quality/program-overview/saturday-stream-

    snapshot

    4.Mill Creek Watershec Emma Chlohessyhttp://millcreekwatershed.org/what-we-do/our-programs/water-quality-monitoring/

    10 years

    15 years

    7 years

    4 years

    We collect 17,325 data points/year from 275 sitesx 6 -8 parameters x 9 months/yr

  • Methods/ Equipment listParameter Equipment/ Reagents Standard

    Method

    Precision Accuracy Range

    Total

    Phosphates

    Grab Sample in 250 mL container/ Digestion

    with Sulfuric Acid and Potassium

    Permanganate; then Sodium Hydroxide and

    Hach PhosVer 3 PO4 Reagents/ Hach

    DR2400 Spectrophotometer

    8190 ±0.06 mg/L PO43- 0.07 mg/L PO43- 0.00 to 3.50 mg/L

    PO43-

    Nitrate-Nitrogen Grab Sample 250 mL container/ Hach

    NitraVer 5 Reagent and Hach DR2000

    Spectrophotometer

    8171 0.04 mg/L NO3––N

    0.04 mg/L NO3––N

    0.1 to 10.0 mg/L

    NO3––N

    Conductivity Grab Sample 250 mL container with Hach

    HQ440d Bench top Meter Package with

    PHC201 pH probe and CDC401 Conductivity

    Cell

    Hach 8160 &

    USEPA 2510-B

    0.01 µS/cm with 2

    digits

    +/- 0.01 µS/cm 0.01 - 200,000

    µS/cm

    pH Grab Sample 250 mL container with Hach

    HQ440d Bench top Meter Package with

    PHC201 pH probe and CDC401 Conductivity

    Cell

    8156 & USEPA

    Method 150.1

    0.00 to 14.00 pH

    units

    +/-0.01 +/- 0.02 pH units

    Turbidity Grab Sample 250 mL container with Hanna

    Turbidimeter HI93703

    2130B 0.0-50.00 FTU

    50.00-1000.00

    FTU

    +/-0.01 FTU +/- 5% FS 0-10 FT

    +/- 10% FS 10-50

    E. Coli/ Total

    Coliform

    Grab Sample in sterile 125 mL container, m-

    ColiBlue24®/ membrane filtration and dry

    incubation in Salvis Programmable Incucenter

    Natural Convection Incubator, 1.8 cu ft, 115

    VAC; 24 hours at 35o C

    10029 one colony

    forming unit (CFU)

    of coliform

    bacteria per 100

    mL of sample

    Sensitivity 96.8%

    Specificity 80.1%

    Overall

    Agreement

    85.7%

    0-200 colony

    forming units on

    readable plate

    Optical

    Brightener/

    In Vivo

    Chlorophyll a

    Grab Sample 250 mL container with

    AquaFluor® Handheld

    Fluorimeter/Turbidimeter

    N/A Not Available Not Available Optical

    Brighteners

    0.5 ppm – 30,000

    ppm

    Chl in vivo 0.3

    μg/L - 300 μg/L

  • Data Source: Citizens Volunteer

    Cooperative Water Quality Monitoring

    Programs in Cincinnati Metro area.1. Water collected on same date (on 2nd Saturday of month between 7-

    10 am from March-Nov.).

    2. Water Analyses use same or similar methods on the same day in each of 4 laboratories.

    3. Advantage: No agency could sustain this level of output with person power required to sample on same day, 120 volunteer samplers & 35 laboratory workers.

    4. Cost of all analytical methods is about $40,000/year for the four programs ($10,000/yr per program)

    5. Major cost is a laboratory location contributed by a university, a well-funded non profit, a water treatment plant laboratory.

    6. Each program has one person who is paid by some source to take responsibility for the Lab. Operation and data.

  • What our 6 Parameters Tell UsEutrophication Sewage

    Total Phosphorus

    +

    Nitrate-Nitrogen

    Chlorophyll a in algal cells

    Turbidity at low flow = algal biomass scattering light.

    pH elevation by algal growth, especially above pH 8.3

    Conductivity is salts from effluent treated or raw sewage, elevated by deicers in winter.

    E. Coli are human fecal bacteria primarily from bad septic systems, SSOs and CSOs.

    HIGH Nitrogen & PO4 from WWTPs, CSOs, SSOs, poor Septic Systems and raw sewage.

    O2

    CO2 HCO3- ���� CO2 + OH-

  • OEPA regulates TP to achieve WWH

    Target < 0.15mg/liter

    OE

    PA A

    ttain

    men

    t Cat

    egor

    ies

  • Nutrient targets for protection for

    Ohio midsize Rivers

    Miltner 2010 Environmental Management

    Target to meet WWH is 1.0 mg NO3-N and 0.10 mg TP/l iter

  • Median Total P in Metro Rivers is highest in the Mill >GMR>LMR>WWR. Median TP met the WWH safety

    concentration only in the Whitewater R at 0.10 mg TP/l.

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    Cum

    ulat

    ive

    % o

    f Sam

    ples

    0.01 0.1 1 10 Total P Conc. (mg P/liter)

    GMR LMR MIll C Ohio WW

    Total P in mainstem Urban Rivers

    Median TPMill CkWWR

    LMRGMR

    Median TP

  • 0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    0.1 1 10 Conc. of Nitrate+Nitrite (mg N/liter)

    GMR LMR Mill Ck Ohio R WW

    Mainstem NO3 -N in Urban Cincinnati Metro Rivers

    median N conc.

    Median Nitrate in Metro Rivers varies widely,

    highest in GMR > LMR >WWR> Mill CreekC

    um

    ula

    tive

    % o

    f sa

    mp

    les

    Mill C< WWR

  • Landuse of GREAT MIAMI R near Mouth

    is agricultural and gravel mining.

    Pasture/Hay (%) (11.70%)Grassland/Herbaceous (%) (2.13%)

    Tree Canopy (%) (25.53%)

    Cultivated Crops (%) (51.06%)

    Impervious Surface (%) (1.06%)

    Developed (%) (8.51%)

    Landuse of Great Miami R. Watershed

  • Open

    Water

    Developed

    , Open

    SpaceDeveloped

    , Low

    Intensity

    Developed

    , Medium

    IntensityDeveloped

    , High

    Intensity

    Barren

    Land

    Deciduous

    Forest

    Evergreen

    ForestMixed

    Forest

    Shrub/Scr

    ubGrassland/

    Herbaceou

    s

    Pasture/H

    ay

    Cultivated

    Crops

    Woody

    Wetlands

    Emergent

    Herbaceou

    s Wetlands

    WW07 NCLD Classification

    WHITEWATER RIVER is

    surrounded by greenspace

    and farming.

    Pasture/Hay (%) (11.70%)Grassland/Herbaceous (%) (2.13%)

    Tree Canopy (%) (25.53%)

    Cultivated Crops (%) (51.06%)

    Impervious Surface (%) (1.06%)

    Developed (%) (8.51%)

    Landuse of Whitewater R. Watershed

  • LITTLE MIAMI R is our first National and State

    Scenic Rivers, 54% of riparian zone protected.

    EFLMR

    LMR

    This image cannot currently be displayed.

    Pasture/Hay (%) (11.65%)Grassland/Herbaceous (%) (0.97%)

    Impervious Surface (%) (3.88%)

    Tree Canopy (%) (18.45%)

    Cultivated Crops (%) (47.57%)

    Developed (%) (17.48%)

    Landuse of Little Miami R. Watershed

  • MILL CREEK is surrounded by impervious surfaces

    of commercial businesses and residential, but

    WWTP uses Tertiary Treatment for N & P.

    Developed, Low Intensity (%) (28.16%)Tree Canopy (%) (26.21%)

    Developed, Medium Intensity (%) (15.53%)

    Developed, High Intensity (%) (7.77%)

    Undeveloped (%) (15.53%)

    Agriculture (%) (3.88%)Cultivated Crops (%) (1.94%)

    Pasture/Hay (%) (0.97%)

    Landuse of Mill Creek Watershed

    Cultivated Crops (%) (1.79%)Pasture/Hay (%) (0.89%)Grassland/Herbaceous (%) (0.00%)

    Tree Canopy (%) (24.11%)

    Developed (%) (47.32%)

    Impervious Surface (%) (25.89%)

    Landuse of Mill Creek Watershed

  • Water Year 2016

    Mill Creek Whitewater River

    Great Miami R. Little Miami R.

    Rainfall runoff and effluent add water

    flows to our rivers throughout the year.

    Our rainfall is becoming very intense and

    very local giving each river unique flow

    patterns. Biggest rain flooded Norwood.

    Log

    (D

    isch

    arg

    e [

    cfs]

    )

  • (Runoff/yr)/(drainage area*1/365) = Runoff

    from each acre= ft of Runoff/yrWhitewater River 1.391 feet runoff/yr

    Great Miami River 1.032 feet runoff/yr

    Mill Creek 1.402 feet runoff/yr

    Little Miami River 1.219 feet runoff/yr

    Rainfall = 3.25 feet/year

    Clearly less water runs off per year from the Great Miami River and Little Miami River compared to the Mill Creek dominated by impervious surfaces. Vegetation removal and impervious surface exacerbate the severity of rainfall runoff.

    Rainfall Runoff is increased as a function of

    impervious cover 2016

  • Phosphorus &

    inorganic Nitrogen

    input from sewers,

    farmland or seepage

    enriches streams

    causing dense algal

    blooms.

    Attached algae on riffle rocks and suspended ‘planktonic’ algae in MC and WWR above.

    CSO 5 Lick Run Pristine Superfund Site Reading

  • Total P was lowest in mainstem of WWR<

    Mill Ck< LMR < GMR

    Average mg P/l 0.12 0.19 0.24 0.38

    River 2016 WWR Mill C LMR GMR

    OEPA goal is 0.10 mg TP/l that achieves WWH for fish and insects

  • MBI found only 0.088 mg TP/l at 17 sites in the LMR during summer of 2012.

    Total P was highest in GMR &

    LMR; WW was nearest WWH

  • Nitrate is highest in GMR & LMR mainstem. All mainstem sites had higher Nitrate than their tributaries, suggesting direct injections of effluent or

    agricultural row crop runoff. OEPA goal is 1.0 mg NO3-N/liter for WWH.

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    NO

    3-N

    (m

    g N

    /lite

    r)

    GMR

    GMR tribsLMR

    LMR tribs

    Mill CkMill Ck tribs

    WW R

    WW TribsOhio R

    River or River Tributaries

    Average NO3+NO2-N of rivers inUrban Cincinnati Metro Area 2015

    MBI found a median of 2.176 mg NO3-N/l in the LMR at 17 sites during summer of 2012.

  • Effluent IndicatorsConductivity was higher in the

    tributaries of each river than in the mainstem. Order shows MC>GMR>LMR>WWR>Ohio R, Values over 700uS are likely enriched with effluent. WWR was the cleanest.

    E.Coli are a direct measure of untreated sewage. E. coli were highest in MC>LMR>GMR> WWR. Tribs were a potentailsource of E. coli in all watersheds. MC received E.colidirectly to mainstem where CSOs discharge.

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    Ave

    rage

    Con

    duct

    ivity

    (uS

    )

    GMR

    GMR tribsLMR

    LMR tribs

    Mill CkMill Ck tribs

    WW R

    WW TribsOhio R

    River or River Tributaries

    Average Conductivity of rivers inurban Cincinnati Metro Area 2015

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    M

    edia

    n #/

    100m

    l (cf

    u or

    mpn

    /100

    ml)

    GMR

    GMR tribsLMR

    LMR tribs

    Mill CkMill Ck tribs

    WW R

    WW TribsOhio R

    River & Tributary

    Median E. coli of rivers inUrban Cincinnati Metro Area 2015

  • Algal Eutrophication Indicators• Turbidity is light scattering

    matter, normally clays & silts

    with high discharge, but

    suspended algae in summer.

    LMR was highest as were all

    mainstems where algae can

    develop.

    • pH is elevated by algal photosynthesis, highest in LMR

    > GMR> WW>Mill Ck, related

    to flow rate and deep pools to

    allow algae to grow from

    nutrient enrichment

  • E. Coli are safe for

    canoeing all year in

    GMR,WWR, LMR with

    caution in Mill Ck.

    Whitewater River 2016 Avg annual E. coli = 355 cfu/100ml

  • Water Quality Ranking System

    Parameter 5.0 - 4.0

    excellent

    3. 9 – 3.5

    good

    3.9 – 3.0 =

    enriched

    2.9 – 2.0

    fair

    < 2.0

    poor

    Nitrates (mg/L) 5.0

    Total Phosphates

    (mg/L)

    0.50

    pH (pH units) 6.5 – 8.1 8.1 – 8.3 8.4 – 8.7 8.7 - 9.0 >9.0

    Turbidity (NTU) 100

    Conductivity uS 1000

    E. coli (cfu)

    (Total Coliforms

    not used.)

    1030

    5-4 4-3.5 3.49-3.0 3-2.0

  • Water Quality

    Scores for River

    mainstems 2016• We can compare our rivers

    by deviation from OEPA goals scored 1(fails) to 5(comply). Variance on y-axis is monthly variation.

    Avg WQR = 3.38

  • Little Miami

    River is our first

    State and

    National Scenic

    River

    But today it is

    challenged with

    success, development,

    nonpoint source

    pollution and 10

    WWTPs

  • Whitewater River

    Whitewater

    River is the

    cleanest

    water in our

    area by far.

    Most of the

    watershed is

    forested and

    row crop,

    with few

    towns.

    Most sites reach EWWH, the highest in Ohio ~ Reference reaches of clean water.

  • Mill Creek has one 10 mgd WWTP using

    nutrient reduction for N and P make it

    our cleanest river in 2015, but it still has

    many CSOs after rainfall events which

    show in high E. coli density.

    CSO 5

  • TP point source load GMR OEPA 2012

    TP load 2580 lbs P/day in 2015 from 11 effluents below Dayton above Hamilton Co.

    2006-2010

    Eastern Regional Mongomery Co (13 )

    Beaver Ck Green Co (8.5 )Xenia Ford Rd (3.6 )

    Sycamore Ck Hamilton Co (9 )

    Wards Corner Clermont Co (2 )

    Middle East Fork Clermont Co (7.2 )

    Lower East Fork Clermont Co (9 )Milford (1.2 )

    Sugar Ck, Green Co (9.9 )

    Xenia-Glady Run (4 )

    Waynesville (0.71 )

    Lebanon (6 )

    Mason @2 (13 )

    Polk Run Hamilton Co (8 )

    O'Bannon Ck Clermont Co (4.4 )

    Lower Little Miami Warren Co (12 )

    WWTP Effluent Volume LMR

    GMR TP daily load from point sources = 122 cfs south of Hamilton

    = 21 % of lowest flow last 10 yrs.

    Many more small WWTPs

    exist on the LMR putting out

    111 mgd or 171 cfs of treated

    effluent, doubling lowest flow

    of LMR measured.

  • Little Miami River is

    enriched with TP with no

    year equal to target 0.1

    mg TP/liter. Effluent

    discharges occur along

    its length in our reach.

    Tribs are not the source

    of TP.

    Dissolved Nitrate-N shows no pattern in our data since 2008 and average exceeds target of 1.0 mg NO3-N/liter . All Trib. Averages are less than mainstem.

  • Summary 2016• The Whitewater River, is the cleanest river for nutrients meeting the

    standard for WWH? But in 2013 it met OEPA EWWH for fish and macroinvertebrates.

    • Great Miami River is challenged by nutrient loading upriver from row crop agriculture and WWTPs effluent. Lower River is recovery zone for that nutrient loading. Little Miami River is challenged by numerous WWTPs along its length. The Mill Creek is challenged with impervious surface and conductivity.

    • Our citizen volunteers concerned about their environment can monitor our Green Umbrella watersheds at many, many sites and show trends over years. Clean water pays for itself in home values, increased property tax and visitation for canoeing, kayaking, and cycling and river events.

    • Value of our data is that it directly comparable, collected on the same day within a two hour window, will be available within a month of collection. The data set extends 3 to 14 years back from as well so we can look at trend and controls of water quality.

  • Canonical Correspondence Analysis of Water Quality & Land Use

    Upriver 2016

    LMR

    GMR

    Mill Ck

    Whitewater RWest side Tributaries

    Nitrate

    E.coli

    pH

    NTU

    CondTP

  • CCA does a Principal Componet analysis of sites vs

    landuse and calculates the partial regressions with

    water chemistryRegression coefficients:6

    F1 F2 F3

    NO3-N -0.504 -0.769 -0.066

    pH -0.085 0.558 0.322

    TP -0.025 0.461 0.071

    NTU 0.137 -0.250 -0.445

    E. coli 0.492 -0.270 0.983

    Cond 0.537 -0.199 -0.917

    Principal coordinates (Objects):

    F1 F2 F3

    Open Water (%) -0.487 0.006 0.741

    Developed (%) -0.387 0.112 -0.012

    Agriculture (%) 0.881 0.191 0.006

    Undeveloped (%) 0.153 -0.284 0.005

    Impervious Surface (%) -0.528 0.155 -0.006

    Tree Canopy (%) -0.019 -0.144 -0.018

    Axes 1, 2, & 3

  • How is our Volunteer Data Used?Much of it would not be used if it were not for

    our analysis of the datasets and its public availability in STREAMBANK database with Green Umbrella. But now middle managers from cities,counties,OKI, HCSWD, OEPA, MSD, GCWW can see how their waters are doing annually in comparison to the other watersheds in Greater Cincinnati .

    Issues of septic systems, upgrades and failings of WWTP, watershed land use can be interpreted from water quality data.

    Recreational water users can evaluate their risk from E. coli data.

  • What Can You Do at Home to improve

    water quality & reduce flood pulses

    1. Mulch your grass on cutting, cut >=4 inches

    tall to increase interception & evaporation.

    2. Install rain barrels on your downspouts.

    3. Do not put rainwater down the combined

    sewer, retain on you property 24-48 hours.

    4. Plant evaporative bushes in low areas that

    stay wet after rain.

    5. Dig and plant a rain garden to treat gutter

    and driveway runoff water.

  • Green approaches continued6. Plant a tree to evaporate water in wet

    summers, cooling and purifying your air.

    7. Minimize fertilizer application, no phosphorus

    and use local application of herbicides.

    8. Wash your car on your lawn, not your

    driveway.

    9. Aerate you yard once a year

    10.Put gravel-filled trenches on low side of

    driveway to infiltrate rainwater.

    11. Stop using lawn fertilizing company. Check

    your soil chemistry.