14
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Regional Workshop on the International Basic Safety Standards Session 3b: Justification in Medical Exposures 16-19 October 2012, Kiev, Ukraine John Le Heron Radiation Protection of Patients Unit Division for Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety

Regional Workshop on the International Basic Safety Standardsgnssn.iaea.org/RTWS/general/Shared Documents/Radiation...case-by-case, justification for each procedure. Notes that this

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency

    Regional Workshop on the

    International Basic Safety Standards

    Session 3b: Justification in Medical Exposures

    16-19 October 2012, Kiev, Ukraine

    John Le Heron

    Radiation Protection of Patients Unit

    Division for Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety

  • IAEA

    Justification of medical exposures

    - Evolution of ICRP recommendations

    Should be dealt with in the same way as justification of any other practice

    But adds that each procedure is subject to a separate decision, so that there is an opportunity to apply a further, case-by-case, justification for each procedure. Notes that this may be important for complex investigations and for therapy.

    1990 – ICRP 60

    2007 – ICRP 103

    – ICRP 105

    1996 – ICRP 73

    2011 – New BSS

    A more complex approach - 3 levels

    •Justification of a practice

    •Generic justification of a defined procedure

    •Justification of a procedure for an individual patient

    ICRP 73 approach is maintained – medical exposure of

    patients calls for a different and more detailed approach

    to the process of justification

    1996 – BSS 115

  • IAEA

    New BSS – Justification

    • Follows ICRP recommendations

    • Assigns responsibilities

    • General requirement (as in BSS 115)

    • Level II (for radiological procedures) • Health authority, professional bodies

    • Health screening programmes • Health authority, professional bodies

  • IAEA

    Justification for an individual patient - level 3

    • What needs to be considered? • Appropriateness of the request

    • Use of relevant national or international guidelines

    • Urgency of the procedure

    • Characteristics of the exposure

    • Characteristics of the individual patient

    • Relevant information from previous radiological procedures

  • IAEA

    Who does the justifying at level 3?

    • 2 roles identified in the new BSS • Radiological medical practitioner

    • Referring medical practitioner

  • IAEA

    Who? – Respective roles and issues

    Referring medical

    practitioner • Clinical context, medical

    history

    • Defensive medicine

    Radiological medical

    practitioner • Knowledge about procedure –

    benefits, risks, limitations

    • Financial conflict of interest

    “Request for consultation”

    versus “instruction to perform”

    Referral guidelines / criteria of appropriateness

    ..shall be carried out through consultation between the radiological

    medical practitioner and the referring medical practitioner, ….

  • IAEA

    Asymptomatic individuals – intended early

    detection of disease

    • “Cutting-edge” research versus “entrepreneurial” medicine

    • Self-presenting patients

    • New BSS • Referring medical practitioner/Radiological medical

    practitioner

    • Professional body guidelines

    • Individual informed re benefits, risks and limitations

  • IAEA

    Biomedical research

    • Justification of medical exposures that occur in the context of biomedical

    research

    • Helsinki Declaration

    • Guidelines of the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences

    • Recommendations of the ICRP

    • Ethics committee approval

  • IAEA

    Issues in implementing the BSS

    - Justification of medical exposures – (1)

    • Awareness of radiation risks and hence the actual need for justification

    • Regulations may require justification

    • But little is actually happening

    • “Lip service” only

    • Regulatory body needs to promote awareness

  • IAEA

    Issues in implementing the BSS

    - Justification of medical exposures – (2)

    • Appropriateness • Joint responsibility

    • The referrer (referring medical practitioner)

    • The radiological medical practitioner

    • Development and use of appropriateness criteria

    • Professional bodies

    • Availability of relevant information from the patient’s previous radiological procedures

    • The regulatory body as a facilitator

  • IAEA

    Issues in implementing the BSS

    - Justification of medical exposures – (3)

    • Audit • What can the regulatory body do in this area?

    • Medical domain versus radiation protection

    • What should the regulatory body look for during its inspections?

    • Regulatory body needs specialized/trained staff in this area?

  • IAEA

    Issues in implementing the BSS

    - Justification of medical exposures – (4)

    • Asymptomatic individuals • “Worried well”

    • Pressures from advertising, media

  • IAEA

    Issues in implementing the BSS

    - Justification of medical exposures – (5)

    • Biomedical research projects

    • RBs need to ensure there is a system in place so that ethics committees are able to make a

    decision on the “justification of the use of

    radiation” in the proposed project

    • Dose & risk assessment

    • Application of dose constraints

  • IAEA