Regulation & Administration of Construction CE 402 - Jim White

Regulation & Administration of Construction

CE 402 - Jim White

Who Regulates and Administers Construction?

• Federal Government? • no real authority under constitution, except for

special areas, such as navigable waters, railways, airports, etc.

• NBC by NRC, but only given authority via provincial adoption, e.g. BCBC

• The National Building Code evolved a model code to be implemented by being adopted by the provincial authorities.

• The first NBC was published in 1941.


• Provinces? • have the bulk of the authority under the

constitution. Delegates much of this authority to municipalities, and to other organisations.

• Most Provinces and Territories adopt NBC.• HOW? by legislation, and regulations, esp.

Local Government Act. and administrative bodies e.g. WCB Act, Engineers and Geoscientists Act, Architects Act, etc.


• Municipalities?• receive authority from Province within

boundaries prescribed in LGA, Part 21, Building Regulations

• Has prescribed authority to make law via by‑laws, but cannot conflict with provincial law, only add to it, within specific areas delegated.

• LGA, s.694(1)(e) Building Permits & Inspection• These enable, don't oblige, municipalities to

regulate construction by requiring BP


• If municipality doesn't, no duty• If does, obliged to do so reasonably • Rationale? residents know there's a reg.

scheme in place, reasonably assume that scheme imposes a min. std on const.

• LGA, s.694(1)(d) Occupancy Permits; enables municipality to forbid occupancy till all administrative hurdles complied with


• LGA, s.699(2) Geotechnical P.Eng. Certification may be required

• LGA, s.699(6) Conditional Geotechnical Certification

• Covenant, Registered at LTO, required where land is subject to geotechnical hazards: flood, landslide, etc.

• LGA, s.692 B.C. Building Code• applies to all Municipalities and Regional

Districts but NOT outside them


• Minister may make regulations for administration of the building code and regulations.

• LGA, s.700 Contravention of Bylaws ‑ Filing in LTO

• (1) Where, during the course of carrying out his duties, a building inspector

• (a) observes a condition, with respect to land or a building or structure, that he considers

• (i) results from the contravention of, or is in contravention of a bylaw or regulation under of Part 21 or under any other enactment ...


LGA, s.1 "Municipality" excludes Vancouver

• Montreal and Vancouver are the only charter cities in Canada• They write their own building codes, unlike other municipal

jurisdictions, which are stuck with their provinces' codes.• Everything is just a little different in Vancouver: different building

code (Vancouver Building By‑Law etc.) • Different legislation, etc. BUT everything is similar enough that it

doesn't really matter for your purposes now.• Just need to know there are differences, and you have to be

aware of them when working in Vancouver.• Vancouver sometimes implements new ideas which are later

adopted by the other Muni's; e.g. CP program; new building envelope guidelines

Other Bodies

• Workers Compensation Board / Worksafe

• receives authority from Province to make regulations for safety, and to administer them.

• System of insurance for workers. Funded by levy on payrolls.

• Also provides immunity to employers from suits by injured employees.

Other Bodies

• APEGBC and AIBC receive authority from the Province to regulate members and establish practice guidelines, entrance requirements, disciplinary matters, ethical guidelines

• Other Agencies: • e.g. CSA, NRC, ASTM, ANFPA, ULC, BCCA• establish codes which have no legal validity per

se, and may not even be Canadian, but are given authority where adopted by Province or Muni.

Other Bodies

• Homeowner Protection Act and Office

• HPA requires licensing of contractors and mandatory warranties on most new residential construction. Warranties 2 to 10 years HPO administers this plus low interest reconstruction loans.

BC Building Code

• A regulation under the LGA; a modified NBC.

• A set of minimum provisions respecting the safety of buildings.

• Changes every 5 years or so;

• Last revision Fall 2012.

• My notes refer to 2005 version.

BC Building Code

• Definitions (Application)

• Applies primarily to buildings, being things meant to be occupied by people or animals.

BC Building Code

• In many cases that end up in disputes, they arise due to misunderstandings and misinterpretations of information.

• Soil or rock?

• Here, they define "soil" as being readily separated by agitation in water: a reasonable concept.

BCBC: Administration

• s.2.1 Application• s.2.1.2, Part 3, 4, 5, & 6 Apply to most buildings

> 600 s.m. or > 3 storeys (commonly referred to as "Part 4" buildings)

• Residential and other low hazard occupancies, except farm buildings (special code)

• s.2.1.3, Part 9 applies to most buildings < 600 s.m. and 3 storeys (commonly referred to as "Part 9" buildings).


• 2.2 Climatic Data - for design - minimums

• 2.3 Plans, Specifications and Calculations

• Minimum information requirements and presentation standards,

• sealing of drawings, minimum scales, references to survey control,

• fire protection ref.s, plumbing and HVAC ref.s


• 2.3.4 Structural & Foundation Drawings and Calculations

• Seal of structural designer for part 4 buildings• 2.5.2 Structural Equivalents allows custom or

unusual design not necessarily complying with Part 4, where carried out by "a person especially qualified" by (a) analysis based on established theory, (b) full scale load tests, (c) studies or model analogues

Professional Design and Review

• PD&R required for (a) Part 3 and (b) Part 4 buildings, and (c) buildings with common egress systems requiring firewalls

• LGA, s.695 Certification by Engineer or Architect

• Letters of Assurance, where site conditions, size or complexity of development warrant. Letters of Assurance Guide

• LGA, s.694(5) Reduced Permit Fee; Relying on P.Eng.


• Letters of Assurance• Owner must retain a Coordinating Registered

Professional and submit schedules A and B before BP issued and Schedule C before OP or final inspection.

• Schedule A : Confirmation of Commitment by Owner and by Coordinating Registered Professional (one only)

• to coordinate the design work and field reviews of the registered professionals on the project.


• A‑2.6.2.1(1)(a) Coordinating Registered professional is responsible for ensuring someone signs for each relevant code‑related aspect, on B1 or B2.

• 1(2) record field reviews and corrective action taken as a result, and make available to the authority.


• 1(3) seal plans submitted with application for BP, provide a schedule C on completion, and ensure necessary field reviews are completed.

• This is an independent legal duty, not necessarily found in the engagement.


• Division C, 2.2.7: Duties on Termination of Registered Professional important

• Often arises from a fee dispute.• 1(1) Both Owner and CRP must notify the

Authority if CRP terminated. • 1(2) Any RP must notify Authority if terminated

1(3) before termination, or if impossible, ASAP upon termination

• 1(4) Owner mustn't terminate any, unless immediately replaced


• Certified Professional Program: Code Specialists

• Under this program the owner retains a certified profession - an Eng or Arch with extensive code knowledge. CP assures that the design complies with the code, and BP application receives much less scrutiny.

• Reduced BP fee is charged and BP turnaround is faster.

Municipal Liability in Inspection

• The original English case was first applied by the Supreme Court of Canada in Kamloops v. Nielsen in 1982.

• If a municipality undertakes to regulate construction, it will be liable to those who suffer losses due to defective construction which should have been detected by municipal inspectors.

• Since 1982, the cases since then have clarified the sorts of situations in which the courts will impose liability.

• Individual building inspectors have not been held personally liable.


• Harnett v. Wailea [1989] B.C.J. No. 497• Delta failed to warn of bad ground due to

garbage. Muni knew about the garbage and the special foundation needs of the lots.

• The plaintiffs visited Muni hall and asked for anything they had, needed for the design of a house. Muni. said nothing about garbage on the site, etc.

• Duty imposed by MA s.694 (formerly s.734(1)) and fact Delta chose to regulate construction.


• Limits on Liability• LGA, s.285 Limitation ‑ Must Sue within 6 Months• BUT, only for limited things, not for negligence, which is

the primary area in construction; Gringmuth v. North Van 2002 BCCA 61.

• LGA, s.286 Must Notify within 2 Months• LGA, s.755.1 No Personal Liability for Municipal Officers• (1) for actions in the course of duties (3) unless

dishonest, grossly negligent, malicious or wilful, defamation (4) this doesn't protect the body, just the individual


• LGA, s.290 No Liability ‑ Relied on Designer

• Dha v. Ozdoba, (1990) 39 C.L.R. 248 (B.C.S.C.)

• Non‑complying, but Municipality Relied on Engineer or Architect to certify compliance (note where this is the case, reduced fee available for permit, under s.734(7)).


• Vancouver Charter, s.294(8) No Cause of Action: Inspection and Approvals

• Goes way beyond any LGA limits on liability, specifying there is no legal duty on which a cause of action can be based.

• Confirmed in Kaiser v. Bufton's Flowers, City of Vancouver & others (1994) 97 BCLR (2d) 166 (BCSC)

• Protect Vancouver by eliminating any duty of care.

Documents

Regulation & Administration of Construction CE 402 - Jim White