Upload
audrey-glenn
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Number of Waste Disposal Grounds per Location Some interesting stats: There are many operating waste disposal grounds in Canada. Compared to other jurisdictions, Saskatchewan has one of the largest numbers of operating landfills for its population. Led by innovative jurisdictions, such as California, the United States has significantly reduced their number of landfills through massive regionalization, innovative developments and landfill efficiency, and increased waste diversion. In comparison, Ontario 81 landfills for 13 Million people, Alberta has 126 landfills for 4 million people, Manitoba has 132 landfills for 1 million people, while Saskatchewan has 500 active landfills and transfer stations.
Citation preview
Landfills Workshop
Regulations and Best PracticesJanuary 2016
Number of Waste Disposal Grounds per Location
# of Waste
Disposal Grounds
November 2015SWANA Page 3
Fictional Landfill – Tipping Fee Range
Tipping Fee
Low Range
($/tonne)
High Range
($/tonne)5,000 tonnes/yr 143 245
10,000 tonnes/yr 112 18320,000 tonnes/yr 67 109
Benefits of Working Together – Economies of Scale
Legislation, Regulation• Environmental Management and Protection Act, 2010
– Proclaimed June 2015• Municipal Refuse Management Regulations, 1986
– Continues in force as landfill chapters of the Code were not proclaimed
• Environmental Code– Landfill closures follow the Site Assessment and Corrective
Action Plan chapters of the Code• Hazardous Substances and Waste Dangerous Goods
Regulations – May apply if storing fuel, used oil, batteries etc.
Permits
• Private and Industrial landfills are permitted as Industrial Waste Works under EMPA, 2010– Privately owned facilities require a Financial
Assurance held by the Ministry– Municipally owned facilities require submission of
financial statements verifying money set aside• Municipal landfills continue to be permitted
under MRMR, 1986– No Financial Assurance required
Requirements
• Landfill and Transfer Station chapters of the Code were not proclaimed
• Minister's approval is required for establishing, expanding, operating or closing a landfill
• Detailed technical investigation is required• Design must provide long-term leachate
containment and removal
Requirements
• Groundwater monitoring is required in most circumstances
• Operating and Closure plans are required • Landfill closures will be treated as potentially
impacted sites• Follow the Site Assessment and Corrective
Action Plan chapters
Best Practice• Is the approved (regulated) practices of another jurisdiction
– Ie: Standards for Landfills in Alberta, 2010 • Should be followed in absence of detailed guidance in
Saskatchewan– For design and construction of new sites or site expansions– Closure has detailed guidance in Code chapters
• MRMR, 1986 has general guidance but no specific practices– Ie: states an application shall indicate the surficial geology, water
table, hydraulic gradients, and baseline ground water quality in the area
Draft Landfill Code Chapter
• Should not be sole reference in applications but could be used as a general guide– Has not been proclaimed– May not have same format/requirements in future
• Established industry best practice should be referenced
• In most cases best practice from only one jurisdiction should be used– Ie: picking and choosing parts from varying jurisdictions
should be avoided
Siting• Any proponent who intends to establish or operate a landfill
must apply for a permit from the minister authorizing that person to establish a landfill.
• Ministry can be involved early in the process to assist with guidance
• Several sites should be assessed to narrow down possible locations – Consider all possible receptors, environmental and human
• Once a primary location has been chosen:– Complete a full phase II site assessment– Determine the suitability of the site for solid waste disposal
Siting
• MRMR does contain some minimal siting requirements in Section 8
• Not to be located:– Within 500m of:
• a place where food is cooked, prepared or consumed• motel, hotel, domestic residence• School, church, community center, recreation facility or public
building – Within 100m of:
• Highway or cemetery
Siting• Some factors to consider in landfill siting process:
• Working through these helps ensure that any “fatal flaws” are identified early in the process
• Early public involvement is key
Waste source Distance to generators Zoning, planning, or existing land uses
Surface water, Wetlands Proximity to groundwater resources
Soil types and conditions
Utilities Public areas such as parks
Traffic
Surrounding land use, protected areas
Endangered plant or animal species
Historical, archeological, social preservation
Visual screening and buffer zones
Floodplains Other community selection criteria
Environmental Assessment
• Environmental Assessment of Project• Does the site qualify as a development under
the Environmental Assessment Act?• Preform a Proponent Self Assessment through
Environmental Assessment Branch– Further information:
http://www.environment.gov.sk.ca/EnvironmentalAssessment/
Design
• Follow industry accepted Landfill design best practices– Ie: Alberta Code of Practice for Landfills
• Considerations:– Site layout: operational, safety, security – Liner system appropriate for waste and soil conditions– Leachate management systems– Landfill gas management– Storm water management – Any future expansion needs– Eventual Closure and final cover systems
Design
• Design to be appropriate for all types of waste to be accepted and disposed of as well as site conditions– Consider all possible sources of waste: household,
commercial, institutional, industrial• Plan on a regional scale and design sites for waste
stream– Ie: may have once central solid waste site but may
include an inert landfill in region to cut down on transport
Design
• What designated areas need to be planned/considered– Consider efficiencies and security
• Will any wastes requiring special handling be accepted?
• Will Hazardous Substances and Waste Dangerous Goods Regulations need to be considered? – used oil, batteries, glycol, fuel storage
Design• Once all information has been gathered submit application
with all supporting documentation and design information to the Ministry for review – Ensure any and all documentation that is reference is appended
to the application for reference • MOE will review and may request additional information,
clarification, changes etc. before a permit to construct is issued – Review period is general 6-8 weeks with each submission– Allow adequate time in planning for review
• Permit to Construct is issued to the owner of the site
Construction
• Communication with Ministry should be maintained before, during and after construction
• When construction is completed verification will be required– As built drawings specifying any minor changes– Letter stating build as per specifications
Operations
• Once construction is completed an application for a permit to operate will be required
• Required submission of an operations plan for review and approval
• Operations plan can be submitted along with construction application package or after
• The operations plan will be a living document to be reviewed and updated annually
Operations Plans• Establishes operations routine to improve the efficiency of the operation
and maintain compliance• Will identify permit requirements • Will specify daily, weekly, monthly activities• Shall include, at a minimum, procedures for:
– Basic site information, hours of operation, equipment– Waste acceptance, placement, cover, compaction– Surface water management– Nuisance controls: litter, animals, dust, etc. – Record keeping, site inspections, annual reporting – Monitoring and maintenance programs for groundwater, leachate etc.– Contingency plans for identified exceedances – Emergency response plan– Current landfill layout plan including elevations and contours
Environmental Monitoring
• Generally can include:– Groundwater– Landfill gas– Leachate– Surface water
• Potential that not all sites require groundwater monitoring– Justification and sign off from a qualified person
would be required
Environmental Monitoring
• Information on monitoring programs as well as interpretation is included in annual reporting
• Stating analytical results is not enough– Analytical results without interpretation will not
meet permit requirements • Are there exceedances? Are there impacts?
What do they mean? Recommended Actions?
Expansion
• “A horizontal increase outside of the existing approved waste footprint OR volumetric increase of the designed waste disposal capacity.”– Digging a new cell– Switching from trench and fill to mounding/area
method• Previous perception was that entire site was
“approved” – this is not correct
Expansion
• Similar process to Landfill Design• Site is already “chosen” if expanding at current
location• If planning any major changes in waste
acceptance should still preform EA Self Assessment
• Application to include site assessment information and landfill design (operations plan)
Closure
• Should be closed if:– no longer intending to accept waste– waste has not been accepted for 2 consecutive
years– site is at capacity
• Notification to ministry of intent to close a landfill at least 180 days prior to closure
• Once closure plan is approved an Approval will be issued for decommissioning of the site
Closure• Initial first steps:
– Provide notice to users, including signage on site– Clean up site of any litter, recyclable material etc.– Provide initial cover of waste
• Submit Closure Plan for review and approval– Allow 6-8 weeks for initial review and any subsequent
discussions• Closure plan should:
– Minimize the need for further maintenance – Provide a final state that will have the least potential for future
impact on the environment
Closure• Closure Plan should be considered in advance and ideally
a draft is part of the design plan– Allows for advance budgeting for costs and materials – Planning for remaining site life allows for appropriate
calculation of gate fees to ensure money is set aside • For large sites closure is done in a progressive manner • Closure Plan will include:
– Site Assessment Information • Follow Site Assessment Chapter requirements
– Corrective Action Plan• Follow Corrective Action Plan Chapter requirements
Closure
• Ministry recognizes this is costly process• Municipality should provide notice and
complete initial first steps to clean up site• Can discuss appropriate timelines for
submission of required information– Completion of site assessment– Implementation of corrective actions
Closure• Key information to include in Closure Plan:
– Owner contact information– Description of all users of the site – Total quantity and description of waste disposed– Period of operation– Site plan showing adjacent land, land uses, location of drinking water
wells, surface water bodies w/in 1km– Geographical location of boundary, waste footprint, monitoring
wells, leachate holding ponds, storm water ponds etc. and current status
– Estimate of remaining contaminating lifespan• Inferred from interpretation of environmental monitoring or site assessment
Closure
• Delineation required– Source of contamination (what is your waste
footprint)– Potential/identified impacts
• Final cap cover– Required over source to prevent
infiltration/minimize leachate generation– Its this required over entire site?
Closure
• Key activities to include in corrective action plan:– Final site topographic plan– Site drainage plan– Source of cover material– Vegetative cover and landscaping plan– Closing sequence for phased operations– Post closure maintenance and monitoring
Closure
• Key environmental controls in corrective action plan:– Final cover system (clay or otherwise)– Gas control system (if needed)– Groundwater monitoring system – Leachate monitoring and collection as needed
• Should also include a schedule of activities and tasks to be completed during post closure care
Closure
• Post Closure/Long term Care– Continue to collect and treat leachate– Provide groundwater monitoring and any contingency
action as needed– Provide gas migration and emissions control if needed– Final cover maintenance– Maintenance of any drainage and erosion control
features • May be required for as long as the estimated
contaminating life span of the site
Unlawful Dump Sites
• Unlawful dumping = Non Permitted Landfills• Will be investigated by MOE Officers.• Waste including C&D waste which has been
unlawfully disposed of at a non-permitted site is a contravention of The Municipal Refuse Management Regulations and The Environmental Management and Protection Act, 2010 (EMPA, 2010).– regardless if placed on private or public property. – burning of mixed waste including C&D waste without a
permit is prohibited
Unlawful Dump Sites
• Regulations allow for farmer to dispose of own household waste on own land
• Does not allow for business waste to be accepted to own land or waste from others– C&D waste – recycling options– Can include fill, concrete, asphalt etc.
• Illegal dumping – permission is given for waste to be disposed of – landfilling w/o permit
• Littering – permission is not given, waste is dumped by unknown persons
Unlawful Dump Sites
Unlawful Dump/Burn Sites
Unlawful Dump/Burn Sites
Unlawful Dump/Burn Sites
• May be asked/ordered to clean up and conduct a site assessment by a QP, in particular if material was burnt. – discharges - any at site?– was material just dumped or was it burnt or visible
spill of materials?– Site assessment/VSA chapters of code applied.– Corrective Action Plan required.
General Information
• Saskatchewan Environmental Quality Guidelines– https://envonline.gov.sk.ca/seqg-search/– SEQG now has criteria for Soil Disposal at Landfills– Limits for maximum allowable concentration for
use as daily or intermediate cover
General Information
• Landfill Guidance Documents– http://www.environment.gov.sk.ca/solidwaste
• Online Business– https://envonline.gov.sk.ca/login/
• Assistance/General Inquiries – http://environment.gov.sk.ca/contact – 1-800-567-4224