Upload
tranhanh
View
222
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
RegulationsRegulations andand TimelinesTimelines in in BrazilBrazil
SummarySummary
�� DevelopmentDevelopment ofof regulationsregulations
�� CurrentCurrent requirementsrequirements
�� TimelinesTimelines: : pastpast andand presentpresent
�� WhereWhere are are wewe goinggoing to?to?
Content was partially presented at the 2005 DIA Annual Meeting,Washington, DC, session 447
EvolutionEvolution of of thethe clinicalclinical studystudyapprovalapproval processprocess in in BrazilBrazil
�� 1976 1976 –– LawLaw # 6360 # 6360 –– PublicPublic HealthHealth SystemSystem ActAct
�� 1988 1988 –– 1st 1st BylawBylaw (#01/88) (#01/88) �� requiredrequired Medical Medical EthicsEthics approvalapproval of of allall clinicalclinical studiesstudies
�� 1996 1996 –– NationalNational CouncilCouncil of of HealthHealth: : ResolResol. #196. #196�� CreatedCreated a new a new systemsystem for CS review for CS review andand approvalapproval
�� 1999 1999 –– CreationCreation of ANVISA: of ANVISA: independentindependent regulatoryregulatoryagencyagency
EvolutionEvolution of of thethe clinicalclinical studystudyapprovalapproval processprocess in in BrazilBrazil -- IIII
�� ResolutionsResolutions fromfrom thethe NationalNational CouncilCouncil of of HealthHealth::
�� #251/99 : #251/99 : DefinedDefined groupsgroups of of studiesstudies/review/review
�� #292/99 : #292/99 : InternationalInternational studiesstudies mustmust go to CONEPgo to CONEP
�� #301/00 : #301/00 : BestBest comparatorcomparator shouldshould bebe usedused
�� #346/05 : “#346/05 : “UmbrellaUmbrella approvalapproval” for ” for multicentricmulticentric studiesstudies
�� ResolutionsResolutions fromfrom ANVISAANVISA
�� # 911/98, # 219/05 : # 911/98, # 219/05 : CompositionComposition of of dossierdossier
http://www.anvisa.gov.br/medicamentos/pesquisa/legis.htm
CEP (CEP (BrazilianBrazilian IRB)IRB)
�� At At leastleast 7 7 membersmembers
�� AccreditedAccredited byby CONEP CONEP afterafter review of review of writtenwritten proceduresprocedures
�� CompositionComposition of of dossierdossier::
�� ProtocolProtocol, IC, IB...(in , IC, IB...(in PortuguesePortuguese), ), CVsCVs, , plusplus::
�� StudyStudy budget, budget, insuranceinsurance, , listlist of of participatingparticipating
countriescountries andand BrazilianBrazilian sitessites
�� CopyCopy of IRB of IRB approvalapproval in in otherother countriescountries
�� DeclarationsDeclarations of of responsibilityresponsibility
CONEP CONEP -- ““NationalNational EthicsEthics CommitteeCommittee””
�� 13 + 13 13 + 13 membersmembers, 3, 3--yryr mandatemandate
�� ExecutiveExecutive staff is staff is permanentpermanent
�� MonthlyMonthly meetingsmeetings (2 (2 daysdays))
�� StrongStrong politicalpolitical hueshues (social (social controlcontrol organismorganism))
�� Short of Short of resourcesresources
�� DifficultDifficult communicationcommunication
CONEP CONEP –– ModusModus operandioperandi
�� CEPCEP submitssubmits studystudy dossierdossier, , plusplus::
�� ApprovalApproval letterletter andand a a detaileddetailed reportreport
�� CONEP CONEP willwill sendsend to 1to 1-- 2 2 refereesreferees
�� ReportReport issuedissued afterafter monthlymonthly meetingmeeting
�� CommunicationCommunication onlyonly withwith CEPsCEPs
�� InquiriesInquiries oror pendingpending issuesissues restartrestart thethe
processprocess
CONEP CONEP –– ModusModus operandioperandi
�� ResolutionResolution 346 (346 (MarchMarch 05) 05) ononinternationalinternational multicentricmulticentric studiesstudies::
�� OnlyOnly 1st site1st site willwill bebe reviewedreviewed
�� ApprovalApproval willwill bebe goodgood for for allall sitessites(if (if acceptedaccepted byby local local ethicsethics committeescommittees))
�� CommunicationCommunication betweenbetween CONEP/1st site CONEP/1st site duringduring thethe wholewhole studystudy
((periodicperiodic reportsreports, SAE, etc), SAE, etc)
ANVISAANVISAWhatWhat does it does it approveapprove in in clinicalclinical studiesstudies ??
�� StudiesStudies withwith new new drugsdrugs//devicesdevices
�� ImportationImportation of of suppliessupplies
�� ExportationExportation of of biologicalbiological samplessamples
ANVISAANVISAApprovalApproval of of ClinicalClinical StudiesStudies
�� SponsorSponsor oror investigatorinvestigator submitsubmit new new dossierdossier::
�� CopyCopy of of dossierdossier submittedsubmitted to CEPto CEP
�� CopyCopy of of approvalapproval letterletter fromfrom CONEPCONEP
�� PaymentPayment of feeof fee
�� ANVISA ANVISA authorizesauthorizes importationimportation of of suppliessupplies andand
studystudy initiationinitiation
(CE=(CE=““SpecialSpecial CommunicationCommunication”)”)
ANVISAANVISAApprovalApproval of of importationimportation of of suppliessupplies
�� ImporterImporter files files anan importimport licenselicense (on(on--line), line),
basedbased onon exporter´sexporter´s proformaproforma invoiceinvoice
�� HardcopyHardcopy of IL of IL sentsent to ANVISA, to ANVISA, togethertogether
withwith importationimportation planplan
�� ANVISA ANVISA approvesapproves IL onIL on--lineline
�� SuppliesSupplies maymay bebe shippedshipped
RegulatoryRegulatory TimelinesTimelinesHowHow longlong does it does it taketake ??
���������
��������
��������
��������
���������
�� ��� ������������
���
�����
������
�� ��� ����
RegulatoryRegulatory TimelinesTimelines
HowHow longlong does it REALLY does it REALLY taketake ??
�� 4 4 monthsmonths
�� 6 6 monthsmonths
�� 99--12 12 monthsmonths
AlertAlert signssigns
�� StudiesStudies approvedapproved byby ANVISAANVISA•• 2003: 1922003: 192
•• 2004: 2142004: 214
•• 2005: 1262005: 126
�� InterfarmaInterfarma, 2006: , 2006:
�� 98% 98% ofof projectsprojects sentsent to CONEP in 2004to CONEP in 2004--5 5 hadhadpendingpending issuesissues (n= 145)(n= 145)
MostMost commoncommon pendingpending issuesissues
!"#
��#
�# "#
$#
�#�#
%$#
� & � ' � ( ) *
A.A. ConsentConsent FormForm
B.B. Country Country ofof OriginOrigin
C.C. MissingMissing documentsdocuments
D.D. ReasonReason for central for central lablab..
E.E. Access to Access to drugdrug atat thetheendend ofof studystudy
F.F. InsuranceInsurance
G.G. PlaceboPlacebo
H.H. OthersOthersSource: Interfarma, 2006
CurrentCurrent TimelinesTimelines
�+#
�$#
%�#
+#!#
,���!,
�� �
!,���,
� -�
,���%,,
� -�
%,,����,,
� -�
.��,,
� -�
Time to CEP response
,#
�$#
$#�#
,���,�� -� ,���%,,�� -� %,,���%",�� -� .�%",�� -�
Time to 1st CONEP response
Source: Interfarma, 2006
CurrentCurrent TimelinesTimelines
Time from question responseto approval by CONEP
Time from CONEP approvalto ANVISA approval
+#
%#
!,#
!"#
$#
!#
,���%,
� -�
%,����,
� -�
�,����,
� -�
�,���,
� -�
,���%�,
� -�
.�%�,
� -�
%$#
�+#
��#
%#
#
�#
,���%,� -�
%,����,� -�
�,����,� -�
�,���,� -�
,���%�,� -�
.�%�,� -�
Source: Interfarma, 2006
SPEED - study start-up duration
� source: IMPACT� phase 2, 3 studies� DE-projects� years 2004 - today
protocol submission
protocol approval
FPFV
1
overall average: 131
11 12
54 55 6436 45
20 28 36
10172 67 74
4667
4835
58
95 90
28
74 86102
65 6278
26
176160
19
28 22
77
6870 62
35 4444
7353
74 8970
37 42
108
6357
58
100116100
154
56 92
0
50
100
150
200
250
Romania
Thailan
dNorw
ayBulgar
iaSingap
oreSlo
vakia
Nether
lands
Hungary
HongKongJa
pan
United Stat
esMex
icoMala
ysia
Slove
nia
German
yFra
nceUkr
aine
Czech
Republi
cAustr
iaCan
ada
Switzer
land
SpainFin
land
ColombiaPolan
d
Russian
Feder
ation
Sweden
Argen
tina
Denmar
k
Philippin
es Italy
United Kingdom
Brazil
[mea
nst
art-
updu
ratio
nin
day
s]
WhereWhere are are wewe goinggoing to?to?
�� FromFrom 1996 to 2005, 1996 to 2005, thethe numbernumber ofof clinicalclinical
studiesstudies rose rose byby 30 times !30 times !
�� NowNow, , approvalapproval timelinestimelines are are goinggoing in in thethe
samesame directiondirection......
WhereWhere are are wewe goinggoing to ?to ?
�� BrazilBrazil is is notnot takingtaking advantageadvantage ofof favorablefavorableinternationalinternational environmentenvironment
�� IncreasingIncreasing numbernumber ofof studiesstudies
�� MigrationMigration ofof projectsprojects to to lessless traditionaltraditional areasareas
�� PrivatePrivate sector sector investmentsinvestments are flat are flat oror decreasingdecreasingsincesince 20032003
�� BothBoth CONEP CONEP andand ANVISA:ANVISA:�� havehave contributedcontributed to more to more bureaucracybureaucracy andand delaysdelays, ,
withoutwithout qualityquality gainsgains..
�� havehave similar similar problemsproblems, , butbut theythey won´twon´t talktalk to to eacheachotherother..