4
INVENTIONS CONSULTING SERVICES GEOINVENTIONS CASE STUDY Epping to Thornleigh Third Track

INVENTIONS · reinforced piling platform was designed and constructed. TEMPORARY WORKS 63 Date Designed: 24/04/2014 Risk Classification: High Vertical king post retaining wall design

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: INVENTIONS · reinforced piling platform was designed and constructed. TEMPORARY WORKS 63 Date Designed: 24/04/2014 Risk Classification: High Vertical king post retaining wall design

INVENTIONSC O N S U L T I N G S E R V I C E S

G E O I N V E N T I O N S C A S E S T U D Y

E p p i n g t o T h o r n l e i g h T h i r d T r a c k

Page 2: INVENTIONS · reinforced piling platform was designed and constructed. TEMPORARY WORKS 63 Date Designed: 24/04/2014 Risk Classification: High Vertical king post retaining wall design

Project: Epping to Thornleigh Third Track (ETTT)

Location: Sydney, NSW, AUSTRALIA

Contractor: Leighton Lend Lease Pty Ltd

PROJECT OVERVIEW

The $265 million Epping to Thornleigh Third Track (ETTT)

project is a key component in upgrading the main North

line between Sydney and Newcastle which is shared

between passenger and freight trains. The project involves

the construction of 6.0km of new and upgraded track

within the live rail corridor. This challenge includes

significant earthworks, the need to maintain access to

all stations and the need to minimize environmental and

community impacts. Geoinventions Consulting Services

(GCS) conducted 23 independent temporary works designs

on the project and some are explained in this case study.

Page 3: INVENTIONS · reinforced piling platform was designed and constructed. TEMPORARY WORKS 63 Date Designed: 24/04/2014 Risk Classification: High Vertical king post retaining wall design

TEMPORARY WORKS 20Date Designed: 20/01/2014

Risk Classification: High

Risk assessment of the Epping to Chatswood Rail Line (ECRL)

down main tunnel portal should ground anchors be damaged

due to proposed piling works. Several FEM analysis were

conducted to calculate the maximum bending and shear force

per m run on the existing piled wall. Piled wall deflections

were calculated and to mitigate the risk, a geosynthetic

reinforced piling platform was designed and constructed.

TEMPORARY WORKS 63Date Designed: 24/04/2014

Risk Classification: High

Vertical king post retaining wall design to support a 5.0m

wide temporary access platform which allows the operation

of a 20T excavator and drilling rig in order to construct a

soil nail wall near Pennant Hills Road Bridge. Challenges

were space constraints and the construction of a 3.0m high

wall near live rail traffic.

TEMPORARY WORKS 101Date Designed: 28/01/2014

Risk Classification: Medium

Assessment of ground bearing pressure and support

requirements for piling operations at Beecroft Station

Underpass. The maximum piling rig pressure of 301kPa

was supported by a 400mm piling platform constructed

from recycled dense graded base (DGB). One of the

challenges was the close proximity of the piling platform

to an existing parapet retaining wall which would impose

additional load.

Page 4: INVENTIONS · reinforced piling platform was designed and constructed. TEMPORARY WORKS 63 Date Designed: 24/04/2014 Risk Classification: High Vertical king post retaining wall design

TEMPORARY WORKS 170Date Designed: 24/01/2014

Risk Classification: Medium

Assessment of ground bearing pressure and support

requirements for CF6 piling and 100T crane operations

at Pennant Hills Station. The maximum piling rig pressure

of 248kPa was supported by a 300mm piling platform

constructed from recycled dense graded base (DGB).

TEMPORARY WORKS 170Date Designed: 23/10/2013

Risk Classification: Medium

Assessment of ground bearing pressure and support

requirements for CF6 piling operations at Cheltenham

Station near overhead wires. The maximum piling rig

pressure of 263kPa was supported by a 400mm piling

platform constructed from well compacted road base.

ULX TRENCH EXCAVATIONSDate Designed: 24/01/2014

Risk Classification: Medium

GCS conducted over 30 ULX (underlying crossing) trench

excavation design assessments at various location along the

railway line. In some locations, different shoring options

needed to be improvised. Trenches were excavated to a

depth of 1.5m at which point shoring boxes (if required) were

inserted. Efficient installation and backfilling were essential

due to critical time constraints under rail possession.

O F F I C E 0 7 3 1 8 8 9 0 3 8 | W W W . G E O I N V E N T I O N S . C O M . A U

d y n a m i c e n g i n e e r i n g t h r o u g h i n n o v a t i o n