Upload
shannon-golden
View
220
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
REINVENTING THE RESISTANCE
Applying EOM to Militant Organizations in Lebanon
Sarah Elizabeth ParkinsonAssistant Professor of Global Policy and Political ScienceHumphrey School of Public Affairs, University of MinnesotaJune 1, 2014
Empirical Puzzle
• Beirut v. South Lebanon
• Same orgs in 1982
• Why divergent emergence?
Puzzle
Party Structure or Behavior
‘Ayn al-Hilwa(Saida)
Burj al-Barajna(Beirut)
Outward militarization
High Low
Territorial claim making
Yes No
Control of social services
High Low
Inter-party clashes
Frequent (>1x month)
Rare (≤1x year)
BEIRUT Burj al-Barajna
SAIDA‘Ayn al-Hilwa
LEBANON
ISRAELSYRIA
EOM and militant organizations• Autocatalysis/self-reproduction
• Production and reproduction of economic, social, political, and military actors
• Pre-1982: (Re)production of military actors called “guerrilla factions”
• Evolution• Multiple interpenetrating networks • Cross-domain shifts in relational protocols in response to wartime
conditions 1982-1989• Emergent forms of military (and social) organization
• Relational ontology• As seen and articulated by actors themselves• Methodological implications
Studying these processes in the field• Examine the content of relational ties
over time within and between domains• Information (Orders/intelligence v.
general information)• Money (Salaries, bribes v. humanitarian
aid)• Materials (Weapons/other military v.
food/medical)
• Analyze constitutive ties through biographies over time• Focus on change in egocentric networks• Key actors and cliques (Who innovated?
Who was in a position to innovate/invent? Why?)
Perturbation(Regionalized wartime violence)
Emergence of novel organizational forms (invention)
Transposition of relational ties across multiple network domains (innovation)
Argument
Socially Embedded Militant Organization
Kinship
Political Organization #1
Organization #2
Individual Families
Diagram adapted from Padgett and McLean (2006)
A
B
C
Organization #1
Perturbation
Kinship
Political
Organization #2
Individual Families A
B
C
Transposition/RepurposingInvention
Kinship
Political Organization #1
Organization #2
Individual Families
Broker between two families
A
B
C
Research Design
• Pre-war control• Shared shock
• PLO withdrawal
• Temporal and spatial variation in violence• 1982-1985: Israeli
occupation v. Lebanese government control
• 1985-1988 (War of the Camps): Siege v. guerrilla war
Pre-1982
June 19821982-19851985-1988
BEIRUT
SAIDA
SOUR
Beirut: Indiscriminate Targeting
Violence Organizational Outcome
1982-1984: Sabra-Shatila massacre , arrests, arson
Immobile underground cells
1984: West Beirut revolt, reinfiltration
Coordinated underground front
1985-1988: Siege and blockade of refugee camps, shelling
Coordinated defensive front (shared command)
Militiamen and an emergency response team evacuate a wounded fighter from a refugee camp’s inter-organizational defensive front. PLO (mid-1980s).
Saida: Incarceration & Guerrilla Warfare
Violence Organizational Outcome
1982-1985: Mass arrests, denunciation
Mobile guerrilla cells (based on pre-1982 affiliations)
1985-1988: Re-infiltration,guerrilla war with Amal
Factionalized guerrilla organizations (fragmented command)
Map drawn by Abu Riyad, a former inmate of mu‘askar 8 (Camp 8) in Ansar I prison. The three dark circles at the top illustrate the locations of IDF guard towers. Each rectangle is a 25-man tent. Sour, Summer 2012.
Networks and Organizations
Phase 1Clandestine
Cell Systems
Phase 3Military Fronts
Phase 2City-Wide Networks
Postwar Militant Organization
Local Structure
BEIRUT
SAIDA
Pre-1982Militant
OrganizationLocal Structure Mobile
guerrilla cells
Immobile political
cells
Coordinated underground
front
Factionalizedguerrilla
organizations
Coordinated defensive
front
Factionalizedguerrilla
organizationsCentralized
personalmilitias
Decentralizedunderground
clusters
Men’s Military and Quotidian Networks
Initial observations
• Importance of both “positive” v. “negative” network content for emergence
• Actors/entrepreneurs/amphibians don’t have to be “great men”
• Re-evaluation of “gender roles”
Research Agendas
• Opposition and rebel organizations• Modeling mobilization• Conflict dynamics: Multiple-network embeddedness shapes
adaptive trajectories • Relationship between structural vulnerability, adaptive potential,
and sustained resistance
• Regime building• Configuration of ties within regimes (e.g. the president’s brother-
in-law is also the chief of military intelligence and primary shareholder in a tech company)
• Institutional emergence (formal and informal)• Resilience: Which regime configurations are particularly resilient
or “coup-proof” (e.g. Egyptian military and business)