Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Search for the Cause and the Cure for Alzheimer’s Disease and
Related Dementias:
Genes, Proteins, Metabolites, What Does it All Mean?
Dr. Dayan GoodenoweFounder, Prodrome Sciences Inc.
1
“Plurality must never be posited without necessity”
William of Ockham, “Ockham’s Razor”
Complexity must be proven, not assumed
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler”
Albert Einstein
Be aware of oversimplification
2
First things first…
Let’s talk about
death and dying
3
All Cause Mortality – USA 2012
4
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
11000
12000
13000
14000
15000
De
ath
s P
er
10
0,0
00
Age (Years)
50-60 Death-Free Years
Major Causes of Death – USA 2012
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
6000
6500
7000
7500
8000
8500
9000
9500
10000
85
De
ath
s P
er
10
0,0
00
Pe
rso
ns
Pe
r Ye
ar
Age (Years)
Cardiovascular
Cerebrovascular
Alzheimer's and Parkinson's
Cancer
5
6
Cancer Cerebrovascular
AD and PDCardiovascular
Major Causes of Death – USA 2012
Age Range
Second things second…
Let’s talk about the basic
structure of our biology and
how do we use this
information to monitor
health and disease
7
DNA
mRNA
proteins
activated proteins
substrates products
(genome)
(proteome)
(metabolome)
Genotype
Genes, Proteins and Metabolites:
8
DNA
mRNA
proteins
activated proteins
substrates products
(genome)
(proteome)
(metabolome)
Genotype
Genes, Proteins and Metabolites:
Only 10-15% of AD cases can be linked to genetic causes
9
DNA
mRNA
proteins
activated proteins
substrates products
(genome)
(proteome)
(metabolome)
Phenotype
Environment
Environment10
Genes, Proteins and Metabolites:
DNA
mRNA
proteins
activated proteins
substrates products
(genome)
(proteome)
(metabolome)
Phenotype
Environment
Environment
Over 85% of AD cases can be linked to acquired changes due to environmental interactions
11
Genes, Proteins and Metabolites:
Trend of Age-specific Incidence Rate of CRC in Japan (1970-1999)
Males, Incidence/100,000
Colon Cancer Rates in Japan
20 Years Earlier
3X More Cases
12
All Cause Mortality – USA 2012
13
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
11000
12000
13000
14000
15000
De
ath
s P
er
10
0,0
00
Age (Years)
50-60 Death-Free Years
What is Happening
Here?
Disease-Mediated Mortality
Time
Healthy
At-Risk
Active Disease
Death
14
This is the Disease Prodrome
Curing Disease
Time
Healthy
At-Risk
Active Disease
Death
15
To Cure a Disease We Must Detect and Correct the Prodrome Before
it Becomes a Disease
• Part I – Clinical - What exactly is dementia?
• Part II – Post-mortem - What does the human brain tell us about dementia?
• Part III - Biochemistry – What are the key biochemical features of dementia?
• Part IV – Epidemiology – The prodromal features of dementia; dementia and mortality
• Part V – Therapeutics – Novel neuroprotective and neuroregenerative possibilities
• Part VI – What to do while we wait for the cure
OK, Now Let’s Talk About Dementia:16
1616
Part I:
What Exactly Is
Dementia?
17
Dementia = Decreased Cognition:18
1818
Prevalence increases dramatically after age 7519
1919
More Prevalent in Females (Occurs Earlier)
2020
ACh
AcCh
Pre-Synaptic Terminal
Post-Synaptic Terminal
ACh
ACh
ACh
AChACh
Acetylcholine Esterase
CHT
ChAT
The Neurochemistry of Thinking:21
21
Perry et al., 1978
Post Mortem (Cortex):
22
22
The Neurochemistry of Thinking:
22
PreSynaptic Terminalis
PostSynaptic Terminalis
ACh
ACh
ACh
AChACh
ACh
Drachman, 1977
Healthy Volunteers:
Scopolamine (muscarinicantagonist)
X X X
Short-term memory loss similar to AD
23
23
The Neurochemistry of Thinking:
23
PreSynaptic Terminalis
PostSynaptic Terminalis
ACh
ACh
ACh
AChACh
ACh
Drachman, 1977
Healthy Volunteers:
Scopolamine (muscarinic antagonist)
+
Physostigmine
(ACE Inhibitor – Like Aricept)
X XAttenuation of memory loss
24
24
The Neurochemistry of Thinking:
24
• Risk of dementia begins to significantly increase after age 75;
• More common in females than males
• Cumulative prevalence at age 95 is ~80%;
• Decreased cholinergic function is the primary, if not sole, proximate cause of impaired cognition;
• This fact has remained unchanged for over 35 years
• What is the cause of cholinergic dysfunction?
Part I Summary:25
2525
Part II:
What Does the Brain
Tell Us About
Dementia?
Post-Mortem Analyses
26
26
Amyloid Plaques
Shrinkage
Tangles
Three main pathologies:27
2727
AD Pathology and Cholinergic Function
Perry et al., 1981
28
28
WOW! – More Plaques = Less Cholinergic Function – Is this the smoking gun?
28
• By age 95, 80% of persons have amyloid pathology;• In the elderly, plaques and tangles appear together
Braak and Braak, 1997
29
29
Amyloid Pathology and Aging:
29
Braak and Braak, 1997
30
30
Neurofibrillary Tangles and Aging:
• By age 80, everybody has tangles in their brain
30
AD Pathology and Cognition at Time of Death:
Bennett et al., 2005
31
31
• 55% of cognitively normal elderly meet the pathological criteria for AD diagnosis at death
31
Clearly, AD Pathology
is not Causing
Dementia
Let’s keep searching…
32
32
Post-Mortem Brain Analyses
Brain Regions Studied: Inferior Temporal Cortex; Medial Frontal Cortex; CerebellumBasic Pathology: Tangles, AmyloidLipids (LC-MS/MS; n=122): Ethanolamine Plasmalogens (PlsEtn; n=15); Phosphatidylethanolamines (PtdEtn; n=16); Phosphatidylcholines (PtdCho; n=31); Triglycerides (TAG; n=10); Glycerols (DAG/VAG; n=47); Cholesterol (Free, esterified, total)
Transcripts (RT-PCR; n=25): Peroxisomal (DHAPAT, ADAP-S, PEX5, PEX7, PEX11a,b); Methyltransferases (PEMT, COMT, PNMT); Mitochondrial Biogenesis (TFAM, NRF1, PGC1α, COX1); Cholinergic (ACHE, CHAT, CHT); Inflammation (GFAP, LysM, MBP, CRP); Membrane (FLOT); Other (Mt-1, Mt-2)
33
Gender n Age Cognitive StatusNCI / MCI / AD
BraakI+II / III / IV / V+VI
Cerad1 / 2 / 3 / 4
Female 51 90.0 ± 5.0 20 / 12 / 19 7 / 15 / 12 / 17 19 / 13 / 5 / 14
Male 49 86.9 ± 6.2 18 / 12 / 19 14 / 11 / 16 / 8 16 / 15 / 7 / 11
Total 100 88.5 ± 5.8 38 / 24 / 38 21 / 26 / 28 / 25 35 / 28 / 12 / 25
Ordered Regression of NCI/MCI/AD:
Model adjusted for age, education and sex
• Membrane DHA-Plasmalogen levels have the strongest association with cognition of all brain pathologies studied
• Flotillin is a biomarker of membrane lipid rafts (where β-secretase is located); CHT is the Choline High Affinity Transporter which is obligate for cholinergic neuron viability.
34
Variable OR (e^bStdX) p
DHA-PlsEtn 0.199 3.8e-05
Flotillin 2.95 8.0e-08
CHT 0.394 2.9e-02
Tangles 1.93 2.9e-02
Cognition Flotillin
ApoE ε4
Amyloid
Tangles CHTDHA-PlsEtn
• Membrane DHA-Plasmalogenlevels interact with Tangles and reduce the contribution of Tangles to Cognition
• APOE and Amyloid are not associated with cognition when tangle density is in model
35
Interaction Map of Brain Pathology and Cognition
Part II Summary
• When multiple variables are examined together, the key brain pathologies associated with decreased cognition are:• Decreased plasmalogens (membrane lipid);• Increased Flotillin (biomarker of lipid raft region of
membranes);• Decreased Choline High Affinity Transporter (biomarker of
cholinergic neurons);• Neurofibrillary Tangles.
• APOE e4 genotype is NOT directly associated with decreased cognition (associated with increased amyloid)
• Brain Amyloid is NOT directly associated decreased cognition (associated with increased tangles)
Which of these associations are CAUSING decreased cognition?!
36
Part III:
Biochemistry
37
Plasmalogens are a special class of membrane phospholipid
38
The fatty acid sidechains
mediate fluidity
38
Neurotransmitter Release: 39
3939
Plasmalogens and membrane fusion40
PlsEtn (18:0/20:4)
PlsEtn (16:0/18:1)
PtdEtn (16:0/18:1)
PtdEtn (18:0/20:4)
Glaser and Gross, 1995
40
Plasmalogens:
Amyloid Pathology
4141
Amyloid Plaques are Comprised of Aβ Protein
Fragments
α-Secretase = Healthy APP Processing
β-Secretase = Pathologic APP Processing
42
4242
The Biochemistry of Amyloid Plaque Formation
α-Secretase is Located in Phospholipid-Rich Membranes(remember DHA-Plasmalogen)
β-Secretase is Located in Cholesterol-Rich Membranes(remember Flotillin)
43
4343
The Membrane Location of Amyloid Plaque Formation
Membrane Modification and Amyloid 44
• Increasing Membrane DHA-Plasmalogen Increases α-Secretase Levels and activity
4444
DHA-Plasmalogenprecursor
Increasing Membrane DHA-Plasmalogen Levels:
• Reduces Aβ42 Levels
• Neutralizes Effect of Cholesterol
45
4545
Membrane Modification and Amyloid
-.6
-.5
-.4
-.3
-.2
-.1
0.1
.2.3
Non E4 E4
-.6
-.5
-.4
-.3
-.2
-.1
0.1
.2.3
Female Male
-.6
-.5
-.4
-.3
-.2
-.1
0.1
.2.3
Female Male
Variable Coef p
ApoE ε2ε3/ε3ε3 Reference
ApoE ε3ε4/ε4ε4 0.417 1.3e-03
DHA-PlsEtn (=mean +1SD) -0.295 3.7e-02
Age 0.028 6.5e-01
Female Reference
Male 0.044 5.1e-01
E4
Non E4 DHA-PlsEtn( >Mean + 1SD)
DHA-PlsEtn( < Mean + 1SD)
DHA-PlsEtn (>Mean + 1SD)
DHA-PlsEtn( < Mean + 1SD)
Human Brain Membrane Composition, APOE, and AmyloidA
myl
oid
Outcome: Brain Amyloid
High membrane DHA-PlsEtncounteracts the association between ε4 and amyloid
46
(Metabolites) (Genes) (Proteins)
Plasmalogens:
Age and Gender
47
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 >90
Me
an
He
igh
t R
ati
o
Ohio_CTL_F
Ohio_CTL_M
SDCL_CTL_F
SDCL_CTL_M
48
Blood Plasmalogens and Age
Part III Summary
• Low brain plasmalogen levels are associated with lower cognition:• Low membrane plasmalogens = reduced membrane
fusion
• High brain plasmalogen levels are associated with lower brain amyloid:• Increasing membrane plasmalogens reduces amyloid
production
• Serum plasmalogen levels decline with age.
49
Part IV:
Epidemiology
50
50
Epidemiologically, there is only ONE (1)
variable that matters to you or me:
Time to Dementia
The goal is to make this as long as possible
Risk factors accelerate this time;
Protective factors slow this time
51
Rush University Longitudinal Study on Aging
LastClinical
Visit
T0T-1T-2T-3T-4T-5
T+1 T+2 T+3 T+4
T>5
T+5 T>5
Participants Still Living (n=896)
Yearly Clinical Visits
Participants Deceased SinceLast Visit (n=862)
8782 Serum Sample Analyses
729 Post-Mortem Analyses
• Final Dataset: 1262 participants (Last Clinical Visit)• Demographic data: Age, Sex• Genetic Data: APOE genotype• Metabolomic Data: HDL/LDL, Triglycerides, Glucose, Plasmalogens;• Clinical Data: Diagnosis of Dementia, Cognitive Status
52
Prodrome Analysis
Mortality Analysis(Later…)
Rush University Longitudinal Study on AgingVariable Values
n, Visit 1 (Female | Male) 1262 (959 | 303)
n, Visit 2 (Female | Male) 1262 (959 | 303)
n, Deceased post visit 2 (Female | Male) 557 (399 | 158)
Education, Mean ± SD 15.4 ± 3.5
APOE Genotype: ε2ε3 | ε3ε3 | ε3ε4,ε4ε4 180 | 800 | 282
Visit 1 Age, Mean ± SD 81.3 ± 7.4
Visit 2 Age, Mean ± SD 85.0 ± 7.6
ΔAge (V2-V1) 3.7 ± 1.5
Visit 1 Diagnosis: NCI | MCI | AD 899 | 304 | 59
Visit 2 Diagnosis: NCI | MCI | AD 774 | 302 | 186
Visit 1 Dementia: No | Yes 1185 | 77
Visit 2 Dementia: No | Yes 1036 | 226
Visit 1 Global Cognition, Mean ± SD 0.092 ± 0.628
Visit 2 Global Cognition, Mean ± SD -0.199 ± 0.915
ΔGlobal Cognition (V2-V1) -0.291 ± 0.566
Visit 1 Plasmalogens, Mean ± SD -0.065 ± 0.178
Visit 2 Plasmalogens, Mean ± SD -0.098 ± 0.193
ΔPlasmalogens (V2-V1) -0.032 ± 0.177
Age to death from visit 2, Mean ± SD 1.6 ± 1.5
53
Probability of Dementia at a
Given Point in Time
(Last Clinical Visit)
54
Cross-Sectional AnalysesDementia
(OR)
Visit 2
Plasmalogens
(at visit)
0.520
(4.0e-12)
APOE: ε3ε3
ε2ε3
ε3ε4,ε4ε4
Reference
0.756
(2.6e-01)
2.309
(4.9e-06)
Age (SD=7.6y)
(at visit)
2.094
(5.8e-15)
Education 0.967
(6.8e-01)
Sex: Female
Male
Reference
1.071
(7.1e-01)
Odds ratios expressed per SD
55
0
20
040
060
0
Fre
qu
en
cy
-1 -.5 0 .5 1PBV2
13.6%
7.7%
4.3%
2.3%
22.7%
35.2%
50.1%
Prevalence of Dementia per Standard Deviation (SD) Plasmalogen
1 Plasmalogen SD ~= 7.5 Years of Age
Total Population(Mean ± 95% CI)
Probability of Dementia (Age and Plasmalogens)
56
Probability of a Non-
Demented Person Becoming
Demented in the Future
(Initial Visit versus Last
Clinical Visit Analysis)
57
ΔDementia
OR (p)
Plasmalogens
(V1)
0.571
(3.7e-06)
ΔPlasmalogens
(V2-V1)
0.594
(3.5e-06)
APOE: ε3ε3
ε2ε3
ε3ε4,ε4ε4
Reference
0.739
(3.1e-01)
2.029
(1.4e-03)
Age (SD=7.4y)
(V1)
2.033
(2.7e-10)
ΔAge
(V2-V1)
1.806
(2.5e-07)
Education 0.974
(7.8e-01)
Sex: Female
Male
Reference
1.027
(9.1e-01)
58
Probability of a non-demented person becoming demented in 3.7 years
Total Population(Mean ± 95% CI)
Probability of a non-demented person becoming demented in 3.7 years
59
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 >90
Me
an
He
igh
t R
ati
o
Ohio_CTL_F
Ohio_CTL_M
SDCL_CTL_F
SDCL_CTL_M
Dementia in elderly persons who have normal plasmalogens
60
Although the population average decreases over time, this decrease does not occur in everyone - the top 10% of the elderly have levels similar to young persons
What is the incidence of dementia in elderly persons that do not have an age-associated decrease in plasmalogens?
Longitudinal - Time to Dementia Analyses
VariableAll
(n)No Dementia Dementia
All
(n) No Dementia Dementia
Female 859 859 0 859 696 163
Male 275 275 0 275 221 54
Plasmalogens
>1SD (high)123 123 0 123 117 6
Plasmalogens
rest1011 1011 0 1011 800 211
ApoE e2e3 708 708 0 708 586 122
ApoE e3e3 158 158 0 158 134 24
ApoE e3e4/e4e4 268 268 0 268 197 71
61
Baseline At Event
123 / 1234 = ~ Top 10%
1231011
Cases of Dementia in the 6-Year Follow-up
VariableEvents
Observed
Events
Expectedp
Plasmalogens
(1SD)6 29.7
ApoE ε3ε3 122 139.2
1.20e-04ApoE ε2ε3 24 32
ApoE ε3ε4, ε4ε4 71 45.8
• There should have been 30 cases – there were only 6
• Incidence of dementia was 80% lower in high Plasmalogen subjects versus the general population
62
63
Longitudinal - Time to Dementia Analyses
1. High plasmalogen levels slow the time to dementia2. The APOE e4 genotype accelerates the time to dementia
1
2
Longitudinal Analyses
- Mortality -
64
Rush University Longitudinal Study on Aging
LastClinical
Visit
T0T-1T-2T-3T-4T-5
T+1 T+2 T+3 T+4
T>5
T+5 T>5
Participants Still Living (n=896)
Yearly Clinical Visits
Participants Deceased SinceLast Visit (n=862)
8782 Serum Sample Analyses
729 Post-Mortem Analyses
65
Mortality Analysis
Odds of Dying 1.6 Years after Last Clinical VisitDeath, OR (p) Death, OR (p) Death, OR (p)
Plasmalogens (V1) 0.444 (2.6e-20) 0.432 (1.3e-21) 0.424 (5.2e-23)
ΔPlasmalogens 0.538 (2.6e-13) 0.530 (3.7e-14) 0.514 (1.7e-15)
Global Cognition (V1) 0.691 (7.0e-06) N/A N/A
ΔGlobal Cognition (V2-V1) 0.617 (1.1e-08) N/A N/A
Diagnosis (V2): NCI
MCI
ADN/A
Reference
2.152 (1.7e-06)
3.520 (3.0e-09)N/A
Dementia (V2): No
YesN/A N/A
Reference
2.460 (1.6e-06)
APOE: ε3ε3
ε2ε3
ε3ε4,ε4ε4
Reference
1.234 (3.0e-01)
1.100 (5.8e-01)
Reference
1.210 (3.4e-01)
1.143 (4.3e-01)
Reference
1.073 (7.2e-01)
1.199 (2.7e-01)
Age (V1) 1.948 (1.6e-16) 2.061 (1.2e-19) 2.178 (2.4e-23)
ΔAge (V2-V1) 1.069 (3.5e-01) 1.110 (1.3e-01) 1.109 (1.3e-01)
Education 1.034 (6.6e-01) 0.958 (5.3e-01) 0.949 (4.4e-01)
Sex: Female
Male
Reference
1.898 (5.7e-05)
Reference
1.899 (4.7e-05)
Reference
1.885 (4.9e-05)
66
Total Population(Mean ± 95% CI)
Probability of Dying after Last Clinical Visit
67
Multiply by 2.5X if
demented
Part IV Summary:
• A low blood plasmalogen level is predictive of non-demented persons becoming demented in the near future;
• A high blood plasmalogen level is protective against dementia: the incidence of dementia in persons with high blood plasmalogens is 80% lower than in persons with average or low blood plasmalogens;
• Higher age, presence of dementia, low plasmalogens, and male sex all increased risk of dying
• There is no increased risk of mortality associated with the APOE e4 genotype – cognitive impairment drives the mortality risk
68
Part V:
APOE e4 Specific
Data
69
69
Patient Summary
70
Female
n (%)
Male
n (%)
n 674 (78.2%) 188 (21.8%)
NCI 441 (65.4%) 127 (67.6%)
MCI 135 (20.0%) 37 (19.7%)
AD 65 (9.6%) 16 (8.5%)
Undefined 33 (4.9%) 8 (4.3%)
ApoE ε2ε3 86 (12.8%) 31 (16.5%)
ApoE ε3ε3 434 (64.4%) 115 (61.2%)
ApoE ε3ε4/ε4ε4 154 (22.8%) 42 (22.3%)
Age (Average) 84.7 ± 7.4 84.8 ± 7.0
Age (Range) 58-104 65-100
Education 15.6 ± 3.2 16.2 ± 3.7*
Gcog -0.025 ± 0.80 -0.032 ± 0.77
Triglycerides (TG) 136.7 ± 69.4 122.0 ± 54.1*
Total Cholesterol (TC) 191.7 ± 38.8 160.9 ± 35.3*
HDL-C 63.7 ± 18.1 52.2 ± 15.0*
LDL-C 100.9 ± 33.4 84.3 ± 29.1*
HDL-C/TC 0.338 ± 0.091 0.331 ± 0.087
PtdEtn 16:0/22:6 (PE226) 1.56 ± 0.87 1.05 ± 0.63*
PlsEtn 16:0/22:4 (PL224) 0.84 ± 0.35 0.75 ± 0.30*
PlsEtn 18:0/20:5 (PL205) 1.32 ± 1.30 0.99 ± 0.85*
PlsEtn 16:0/22:6 (PL226) 3.45 ± 1.49 2.85 ± 1.11*
PL205/PE226 0.66 ± 0.51 0.74 ± 0.52*
PL226/PE226 1.86 ± 0.94 2.27 ± 1.09*
PL205/PL224 1.96 ± 2.67 1.54 ± 1.62*
PL226/PL224 4.57 ± 2.51 4.17 ± 1.98*
PL205/PL226 0.36 ± 0.23 0.33 ± 0.17
71
APOE, PlsEtn and Cognition
72
APOE, PlsEtn and AD Incidence
APOE, PlsEtn and Serum Lipids
73
-0.50
-0.40
-0.30
-0.20
-0.10
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
e2 e3 e4 Pls1 Pls2 Pls3 MGx1 MGx2 MGx3
PBV
50
55
60
65
70
e2 e3 e4 Pls1 Pls2 Pls3 MGx1 MGx2 MGx3
HDL
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
e2 e3 e4 Pls1 Pls2 Pls3 MGx1 MGx2 MGx3
TAG
160
165
170
175
180
185
190
195
200
e2 e3 e4 Pls1 Pls2 Pls3 MGx1 MGx2 MGx3
TC
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
e2 e3 e4 Pls1 Pls2 Pls3 MGx1 MGx2 MGx3
LDL
0.30
0.31
0.32
0.33
0.34
0.35
0.36
0.37
0.38
e2 e3 e4 Pls1 Pls2 Pls3 MGx1 MGx2 MGx3
HDL/TC
e2
e3
e4
Pls
1
Pls
3
MG
x1
MG
x2
MG
x3
Pls
2
e2
e3
e4
Pls
1
Pls
3
MG
x1
MG
x2
MG
x3
Pls
2
e2
e3
e4
Pls
1
Pls
3
MG
x1
MG
x2
MG
x3
Pls
2
e2
e3
e4
Pls
1
Pls
3
MG
x1
MG
x2
MG
x3
Pls
2
e2
e3
e4
Pls
1
Pls
3
MG
x1
MG
x2
MG
x3
Pls
2
e2
e3
e4
Pls
1
Pls
3
MG
x1
MG
x2
MG
x3
Pls
2
Part V Summary - A:
• ApoE genotype and PlsEtn metabotype exhibit no association with each other (PBV was constant across ApoEgenotypes)
• ApoE genotypes and PlsEtn metabotypes exhibit similar associations with cognition and percent AD cases
• Both ApoE genotype and PlsEtn metabotype affected each other’s associations with cognition and odds of AD. For example, the percentage of AD cases increased from 6·8% in Pls2:ε3 subjects to 16·9% in Pls2:ε4 and to 20·7% in Pls3:ε3 subjects and decreased to 1·4% in Pls2:ε2 and to 2·6% in Pls1:ε3 subjects
74
75
APOE, PlsEtn and HDL-MCE
Part V Summary – HDL-MCE
• Of the serum lipids investigated, only the HDL-C/TC ratio was observed to have a residual effect on cognition after correcting for ApoE and PBV
• ApoE and PBV were observed to have similar, but independent associations with HDL-C/TC ratio
• PBV has no effect on the HDL-C/TC ratio in ApoE e4 carriers;
• All roads lead to mechanisms that affect membrane composition:• ApoE e4 – indirectly via reduced HDL-C/TC• Plasmalogens – indirectly via increased HDL-C/TC and
directly (plasmalogens are actual membrane components)
76
Part VI:Novel Therapeutic Strategies
in Development
77
78
MPTP Treatment Depletes Serum Plasmalogensand Striatal Membrane Transporters
Striatal DAT Striatal VMAT2Serum PlsEtn
79
Plasmalogen precursor
Extent of demyelination vs duration of cuprizone treatment
80
Cuprizone administeredRegular diet control
Cuprizone + 25mg/kg cocktail Loss of myelin due to 6 wk cuprizonetreatment
Normal myelination in control animals(no cuprizone or cocktail)
Plasmalogenprecursors prevent demyelination (6 wkcuprizone+cocktail)
Effect of plasmalogen precursors on cuprizone-induced demyelination in mice at 6 weeks:
81
Plasmalogen Administration Improves Memory
82
Plasmalogen Clinical Trials
83
Plasmalogen Clinical Trials
84
Upcoming Phase I Clinical Trial in AD
85
Public-Private Collaboration:
• University of Pennsylvania;• Will recruit, perform cognitive testing, administer Prodrome’s plasmalogen precursor
• Alzheimer’s Association (USA);• Will provide 100% of the funding (including drug manufacture);
• Prodrome Sciences Inc.• Will manufacture the plasmalogen bioprecursor
• Manufacturing scheduled to begin 2018.• Enrollment to begin in Q3 2018
• Will evaluate the utility of using Prodrome’s plasmalogen precursor for the treatment of cognitive impairment.
Part VI Summary:
• Plasmalogens can be restored and/or augmented using natural human bioprecursors – Medical Food;
• Plasmalogen bioprecursors are neuroprotective in animal models of neurodegeneration;
• Plasmalogen extracts have shown positive results in two small clinical trials;
• Synthetic plasmalogen bioprecursors are scheduled to enter robust human trials in 2018/19 to evaluate their potential utility in treating and preventing dementia.
86
Part VII:What to do while we are
waiting for the cure?
87
Eliminate the Bad:
• 21% of US AD cases are due to physical inactivity
• 12% due to diabetes + hypertension
• 11% due to smoking
88
88
http://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CAcQjRw&url=http://blogforalzheimers.com/2011/12/27/exercise-can-help-prevent-alzheimers-disease-alzheimers-articles-information-and-resources/&ei=eF7uVOifLYWNyATp3IGwDQ&bvm=bv.86956481,d.aWw&psig=AFQjCNGdaRhxwFChJ5UsabAmo-xGuqfPOg&ust=1424994032448425
Add the Good…
• Mediterranean and DASH diets proven to slow cognitive decline in the elderly (Tangney et al., 2014)
• Physical activity reduces risk of MCI or AD diagnosis in the next 3.5 years by 50% (Covell et al., 2015)
• Aerobic and strength training increases cognition in dementia (Bossers et al., 2015)
• Be proactive – Dementia is not normal aging – it is unhealthy aging
89
89
http://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CAcQjRw&url=http://www.aplaceformom.com/blog/10-16-14-food-from-greece/&ei=Q2TuVKzqOpKqyATus4C4Dw&psig=AFQjCNGdaRhxwFChJ5UsabAmo-xGuqfPOg&ust=1424994032448425
Thank You
90