Upload
caroline-jasmine-gilbert
View
240
Download
6
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Relationship Marketing (3)
Relationship marketing in practiceHow can organisations implement relationship marketing
Chris Chapleo
Commitment
Expansion
Exploration
Awareness
Partners
Clients
Customers
Prospects
Members
Advocates
Partners
Clients
Repeat Cust
Prospects
Members
Advocates
1st Time Cust
Suspects
Tra
dit
ion
alM
arke
tin
gR
elat
ion
ship
Mar
keti
ng
(Dissolution)
Dwyer et al 1987 Payne et al 1995 Kotler 1997
Source: Based on Dwyer, F.R., Schurr, P.H. and Oh, S. (1987) ‘Developing buyer-seller relationships’, Journal of Marketing, 51, 11–27; Adapted from Payne, A., Christopher, M. and Peck, H. (eds) (1995) Relationship Marketing for Competitive Advantage: Winning and Keeping Customers: Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; Based on Kolter, P. (1997) ‘Method for the millenium’, Marketing Business, February, 26–7.
Remember Stages of Relationship
Higher relationships
How to we engender partnership?
What makes you an advocate in your personal/ business life?
How can organisations capitalise on this?
A reality check? Important to separate reality from rhetoric! No research to suggest that those involved in
loyalty marketing actively pursue people ‘up the ladder’?
BA actively differentiate between levels of membership depending on commitment (NB expenditure)
Charities may associate higher level of membership with increased status
May not be a linear progression up ladder? – consumers may ‘demote’ themselves.
Lifetime value
Project the individual value of a customer over time
This may lead to ‘barriers to exit’ rather than a true relationship?
No guarantees – especially in sectors with low exit barriers e.g. retail
Gas and Electricity companies seek to ‘bribe’ switchers?
Loyalty?
Key for companies is a cost- benefit analysis of when it is worth seeking to induce customers to move to the next level? ( Kotler , 1992)
Amazon – reverse loyalty? May –sep 2000 Amazon tried out
dynamic pricing Regular customers would pay more and
should be charged more? Differentiated ‘new’ and ‘existing’
customers. Talk on forums was rife and confusion
became outrage! Amazon apologised and backtracked!
Nationwide Building Society
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFZV3y-p_NY
Financial services may preach relationship marketing but may actually use differential pricing?
Your thoughts?
Consider a brand with which you feel you have a relationship?
Break down that ‘relationship’? – why do you feel it exits
Vauxhall – examples; campaign objectives
Primary objective: the programme had to demonstrate a genuine uplift in sales and an improved return on investment
Secondary objective: a strengthening of the relationship between customers and local Vauxhall dealers
Brand Values – influence loyalty
The constituent elements of the overall brand
Brand comprises functional and emotional values
E.g. Brand values for Ryanair/ BA/ Virgin?
MacDonalds v Pret a Manger
Organix – a case study in brand loyalty?
Tightly focused segmentation Clear brand values A motivated consumer group A good basis for real RM programmes?
RM in Organisational Markets
‘Trading partnerships’ are not new Bonds between B2B partners have a
long history During 1950s golden age of marketing it
was brand owners who developed brands and dominated distribution
70-80s saw change in power balance between suppliers and retailers in fmcg
RM in Organisational Markets
1980s ‘vertical integration’ trend – often through acquisition
Later in 1990s companies realised it made sense to concentrate efforts on core competencies
This led to more outsourcing and partnering E.g. MacDonalds and Coca Cola Retailers and Transportation e.g. Ocado -
Waitrose
RM in Organisational Markets; Benefits for organisations
In depth understanding of customer requirements
Familiar with customer’s ‘way of doing things’
privileged access to future info? Ability of both partners to focus on value
added chain Relationship termination costs
RM in Organisational Markets; Costs for organisations
Dulling of market ‘incentivisation’ Complacency? Over reliance on few customers Lack of creativity or innovation over
time? “ new blood” Restrict true competition?
B2B partnerships’ Advertising Agencies
Classic example Won by ‘pitch’ Require close synergy Alignment of organisational objectives Tendency to cultural and size ‘fit’ Often tend to rely on key individuals Tendency to have finite lifespan due to
changes in decision makers Are these examples of RM?
RM in Consumer Markets
Modern IT allows some form of individual treatment ; “mass customisation” e.g. VW use mail shots to keep Golf buyers ‘warm’, Unis using SMS to ‘convert’ prospects
If we accept that loyalty schemes are examples of RM?…..do they build ‘ real’ relationships?
RM in Consumer Markets; Tescos
Constant data capture - Clubcard 28,000 targeted offers Understanding and segmentation by
‘lifestyle’ But is this real loyalty or convenience?
The service paradox; are the most loyal customers the most satisfied / profitable?
Gummesson (1999) introduced the ‘service paradox’
Less profitable customers are, the more satisfied they are with service?
Eg SAS research – flights Europe to NY Business class is $3000 but very demanding Economy cheap but low price = satisfaction? Ryanair is classic example Lessons for practice? = no simple answers
Criticism of RM
Is RM management ‘fad’? Is it new anyway? ( see Egan 2004 p 240)
One sided communication? – do we want relationships? ”voice of customer missing” ( Buttle 1996)
Selective research used to justify it? Hardly rises above common sense?
The future..
End of 1990s saw question fundamental assumptions behind RM theory:
That it focussed wholly on supplier- customer relationship
Approach was about attracting, maintaining and enhancing customer relationships
Customer service central to this philosophy All had common factor – concerned with
buyer-seller interface
The future..
But later writers such as Gummesson sought to widen RM’s scope
Not just buyer – seller relationship but ‘whole series of relationships and networks are important’?
NB relationships with customers and other stakeholders are important
New theory was that organisations should compete through development of long term relationships with all it’s stakeholders ( Egan 2004)
The future; Implications
There has undoubtedly been an attempt to apply RM theory to areas where it is not suited as consumers want little relationship
Companies start to believe that there is more to their relationship than is the case
CRM approaches typical = call centres
The future; Implications
Companies must not assume that all Customer - supplier contacts are capable of closeness
70-80% failure of CRM projects KMPG 2002
RM had moved us away from functional and transactional approach
Can provide healthy and imaginative marketing environment
Genuine relationships can be built with brands we trust?
Your thoughts?
Brands you Trust?
In what circumstances, as a consumer, do you want a ‘relationship’?
Further Reading
MBR p 275-300
Egan ( 2004) Relationship Marketing p248-258
PS remember RM case study for next weeks seminars