55
1 Relevance Ranking in the Scholarly Domain Dr. Tamar Sadeh LIBER Conference Tartu, Estonia, June 2012

Relevance Ranking in the Scholarly Domain

  • Upload
    odetta

  • View
    51

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Relevance Ranking in the Scholarly Domain. Dr. Tamar Sadeh LIBER Conference Tartu, Estonia, June 2012. The top three keys for success. 1. 2. 3. Content. 1. Speed. 2. Relevance Ranking. 3. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

1

Relevance Ranking in the Scholarly Domain

Dr. Tamar SadehLIBER Conference

Tartu, Estonia, June 2012

Page 2: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

2

Page 3: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

1 2 3The top three keys for success

Page 4: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

1 Content

Page 5: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

2 Speed

Page 6: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

3 Relevance Ranking

Page 7: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain
Page 8: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

8

Relevance is the measure of correspondence between a document and a query as determined by a user

Based on Saracevic, 1975

Page 9: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

9

?

Page 10: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

10

• System or algorithmic relevance• Topical or subject relevance• Cognitive relevance or pertinence• Situational relevance or utility• Affective relevance

• System or algorithmic relevance• Topical or subject relevance• Cognitive relevance or pertinence• Situational relevance or utility• Effective relevance

Page 11: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

11

There is no absolute relevance

Page 12: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

12

Page 13: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

13

Page 14: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

14

Page 15: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

15

Page 16: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

16

Page 17: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

17

Page 18: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

18

The ScholarRank

Project

Page 19: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

19

The GoalEnhance the Primo relevance

ranking algorithm

Page 20: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

20

Relevance ranking was not new to us.

Page 21: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain
Page 22: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain
Page 23: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain
Page 24: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain
Page 25: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain
Page 26: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain
Page 27: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

28

Methodology

Page 28: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

29

• Setting up a team• Building test environment, tools, and

procedures• Defining metrics to evaluate our current

success and the improvements we make• Defining measurements to assess the success

of the changes, once implemented

Page 29: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

30

Evaluation

Page 30: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

31

• Working with researchers• Researchers’ evaluation quantified • Enhancements introduced and checked in the

lab, using defined metrics • Enhancements launched and usage patterns

monitored• Improvements are introduced on an ongoing

basis

Page 31: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

32

How is relevance ranking

calculated?

Page 32: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

33

?

Page 33: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

34

abstract author date full text journal

language type publisher subject title

citations downloads journal impact factor eigenfactor pagerank

Page 34: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

35

academic degree discipline(s) language

location previous selections search history

Page 35: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

36

broad-topic search currency exact-item search material type

narrow-topic search

?

Page 36: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

37

Broad-topic query

Narrow-topic query

Author-related query

Known-item query

Page 37: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

?

Page 38: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

39

?

Page 39: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

40

The match: traditional information retrieval

methods, adapted to the scholarly environment

Page 40: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

42

1

20

100

Page 41: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

43

?no. of citations; no. of selections; recency; type; peer review

Page 42: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

45

1

20

100

Page 43: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

46

?

Academic degree, discipline

Page 44: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

47

Page 45: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

48

Computer Science

Page 46: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

49

Psychology

Page 47: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

50

Mathematics

Page 48: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

51

Physics

Page 49: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

52

?

Author-related query, known-item query, broad-topic query…

Page 50: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

53

Before

Page 51: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

54

AfterTachycardia – Wikipedia the free encyclopediaTachycardia comes from the Greek words tachys (rapid or accelerated) and kardia (of the heart). Tachycardia typically refers to a heart rate that exceeds the normal range for a resting ...

Page 52: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

55

Page 53: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

56

?ScholarRank™

Page 54: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

57

Page 55: Relevance Ranking  in  the Scholarly Domain

5858

Thank You!

Tamar Sadeh, [email protected]