Religious Epistemology – Notes for Seminar

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Religious Epistemology Notes for Seminar

    1/3

    The central problem of religious epistemology reconciling faith with intellectual honesty. Knowledge is justified true belief

    o Condition of Correspondenceo Condition of Verification

    PositionA: faith is expressive or emotive (e.g. R. B. Braithwaite)

    PositionB: faith is fideistic (e.g. S. Kierkegaard)Position C: faith is bipolar, evidential grounds are necessary but lacking (e.g. W. Pannenberg)

    PositionE: traditional reading of faith (e.g. natural theology)1. syllogistic, vertical argumentation (mode of premises and conclusions)2. truth is propositional

    a. correspondence theory = adequation of truth and realityb. coherence theory = proposition logically consistent with other propositions

    within a belief system

    c. pragmatic theory = truth is what worksPositionD: rethinking religious epistemology

    1. The character of the truth of faith is excessivity (cf. I.T. Ramseys disclosuremodel theory).

    2. This character of excessivity contravenes the traditional laws of thoughta. Law of Identity (A is A, but something more)b. Law of Non-contradiction (tradition of negative theology, A and A)c. Law of the Excluded Middle (faith is eschatological, already-but-not-yet,

    hence the instantiation of a middle term, a metaxu).

    Faith and Event Metaphysics

    From Being to BecomingFrom Substance to Process

    From Object to Event

    Luminaries include: Alfred North Whitehead, Isabelle Stengers, Gilles Deleuze, AlainBadiou, Claude Romano, etc.

    Is the

    cognitive

    dimension

    of religious

    belief

    essential?

    Is support

    necessary?

    Can reasons

    be given?

    Must they be

    a priori /a

    posteriori

    YES

    NO

    YES

    YES

    YES

    NO

    NO

    NO

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    and/or

    inductive/

    deductive?

  • 8/9/2019 Religious Epistemology Notes for Seminar

    2/3

    A. Modes of Event Ad-venire

    o A coming into, an arrival, a landing of the othero Transcendence

    E-venireo

    Unfoldingo Immanence

    B. Metaphysics of Event Recuperating the category of relationality Transformation understood as origamic (ontology of the folds) Affirmation of the already-but-not-yet Epistemology of the Promise

    C. Basic Human Activity for Aristotle: Theoria = contemplation of the truth

    Praxis = action which is an end in itself Poiesis = action that produces somethingD. Corresponding Domain of Rationality

    Theoria = speculative reason (sophia) Praxis = practical reason (phronesis) Poiesis = creative reason (?)

    E. Phantasia Pejorative understanding:

    o Daydreamo Illusory appearanceo Whimsical notion

    Phantasia as a possible intellectual virtue:o To picture to oneselfo To imagineo To show or to bring to light (phainein), related to phos (light)o To make visible or to make it appear (n.b. truth as unveiling)

    F. Imagination as Proposition

    Condition of Correspondence (cf. Deleuze)Possible Real

    Virtual Actual

    Condition of Verificationo Fidelity (to the event)

  • 8/9/2019 Religious Epistemology Notes for Seminar

    3/3

    G. Contours of a Becoming-Subject The cause of the subject is an event. There is no subject prior to event An evental subject is a divided subject. An event constituted subject is

    origamic

    Defining character of a subject is fidelity. Thinking according to--H. Essential Characteristics of Truth in Religion (cf. Alain Badiou)

    theory of equality before truth = since no Christian subject pre-exists theChrist-event, all are constituted as sons-subjects or co-workers in thedeclaration and fidelity to the event and its implications.

    Truth is subjective = it belongs to the Christian discourse of declaration arisingfrom the conviction that one has relative to the Christ-event

    Truth is a process = it is de-substantialized, a truth procedure. Truth is indifferent to the state of the situation = the subtraction essential in

    the emergence of truth postulates a distance from the state of the situation.This is the basis of the truths universality.

    I. Truth indicators of faith

    Epistemic fit within a religious doxastic network. Empirical fit = faith needs to do justice to the religious experience of the

    person(individual pole) and the longstanding religious tradition from where

    that religious belief emerged and is sustained (community pole). Poietic fit = witnessing of a believer productive of elements germinal of

    corporate identity.