13
Remembering the birth of the BWC Dr Caitríona McLeish The Harvard Sussex Program on Chemical and Biological Weapons BWC 40th ANNIVERSARY EVENT Geneva March 30 th 2015

Remembering the birth of the BWC - United Nations Office ...httpAssets)/946EDDBE5013… · Remembering the birth of the BWC Dr Caitríona McLeish The Harvard Sussex Program on Chemical

  • Upload
    dangnhu

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Remembering the birth of the BWC

Dr Caitríona McLeish The Harvard Sussex Program

on Chemical and Biological Weapons

BWC 40th ANNIVERSARY EVENT Geneva

March 30th 2015

Understanding Biological Disarmament: The Historical Origins of the BWC  

July 10th 1969   UK tables Convention for the Prohibition of Biological Methods of Warfare

September 16th 1969

USSR and the socialist group submit an alternative draft convention

November 25th 1969  

US President Nixon publicly announces destruction of offensive BW stockpiles (similar announcement on toxins, February 14th 1970)

August 18th 1970   UK tables a revised draft which includes a prohibition on toxins

August 25th 1970   Neutral and non aligned countries introduce their ‘Joint memorandum’

March 30th 1971   The USSR and socialist countries table a draft convention on BW

August 5th 1971   The US and USSR table identical, but separate, drafts in the CCD

September 28th 1971  

Final text for Biological (and Toxin) Weapons Convention agreed

April 10th 1972   BWC opens for signature

March 26th 1975 BWC enters into force

Achieving the BWC was not inevitable

Original UN documents, courtesy of The Sussex Harvard Information Bank

 

“It may look like an academic dispute carried on with excessive stubbornness, but its underlying motivation was the premonition, based on such bitter experiences as the

Partial Test Ban of 1963, that a half-measure, once accepted, would never be completed....”

Alva Myrdal. The Game of Disarmament: How the United States and. Russia Run the Arms Race, New York: Pantheon Books, 1976, p271

Original UN documents, courtesy of The Sussex Harvard Information Bank

 

To get from agreed text to entry into force required large amounts of ‘invisible’ work

Courtesy of The UK National Archives

The BWC was not a typical treaty

BWC negotiating states (current borders)

Lessons from history

1.  The BWC requires collective commitments and actions in support of biological disarmament

2.  To sustain the BWC requires much ‘invisible’ work to be done both here in Geneva and in capitals

3.  The BWC was born from a process of multilateral diplomacy and success during the next 40 years will require continued multilateral effort but increasingly this requires new or renewed engagement with non state actors.

For more information on Understanding Biological Disarmament: The Historical Origins of the BWC

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/sts/cbw

Professor Brian Balmer [email protected]

@DrBrianBalmer

Dr Caitríona McLeish [email protected]

@camcleish

Dr Alexander Spelling [email protected]

@AlexSpelling