1
Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Strange nonchaotic attractors in autonomous and periodically driven systems’’’ V. S. Anishchenko, T. E. Vadivasova, and O. Sosnovtseva Physics Department, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Street 83, Saratov, 410071, Russia ~Received 26 March 1997! We discuss the appearance of a strange nonchaotic attractor in a wide class of dynamical systems when the destruction of ergodic torus takes place. @S1063-651X~97!11210-7# PACS number~s!: 05.45.1b, 02.60.Cb Let us consider the problem of existence of strange non- chaotic attractors ~SNA! in a wide class of dynamical sys- tems from two points of view: the theory of oscillations and bifurcation theory. In @1–3# the appearance of SNA is associated with a torus destruction and described as a route from quasiperiodicity to chaos. Therefore systems where SNA is observed should be characterized by the presence of at least two incommensurate frequencies with irrational ratio. Quasiperiodic oscillations can be generated in different ways. It is known that regions of ergodic quasiperiodic motion in the parameter space of autonomous and periodically driven systems as well as in quasiperiodically driven systems have nonzero measure. Hence nothing seems to prevent the existence of SNA in those systems. In @4# the collision of a period-doubled torus with its un- stable parent has been suggested as one of the mechanisms for the creation of strange nonchaotic attractors. We have found such bifurcation at some values of parameters @5#. But according to the accurate calculations from the ‘‘Comment’’ it does not lead to SNA. Is this bifurcation unknown up to now and leading to the appearance of a chaotic set? We took into account the valuable remarks from the ‘‘Comment’’ concerning numerical experiments. But we proceeded to present evidence of the existence of SNA in autonomous and periodically driven systems. @1# C. Grebogi, E. Ott, S. Pelikan, and J. A. Yorke, Physica D 13, 261 ~1984!. @2# M. Ding, C. Grebogi, and E. Ott, Phys. Rev. A 39, 2593 ~1989!. @3# U. Feudel, J. Kurths, and A. Pikovsky, Physica D 88, 176 ~1995!. @4# J. F. Heagy and S. M. Hammel, Physica D 70, 140 ~1994!. @5# V. S. Anishchenko, T. E. Vadivasova, and O. Sosnovtseva, Phys. Rev. E 54, 3231 ~1996!. PHYSICAL REVIEW E DECEMBER 1997 VOLUME 56, NUMBER 6 56 1063-651X/97/56~6!/7322~1!/$10.00 7322 © 1997 The American Physical Society

Reply to “Comment on ‘Strange nonchaotic attractors in autonomous and periodically driven systems”’

  • Upload
    o

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Reply to “Comment on ‘Strange nonchaotic attractors in autonomous and periodically driven systems”’

PHYSICAL REVIEW E DECEMBER 1997VOLUME 56, NUMBER 6

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Strange nonchaotic attractors in autonomousand periodically driven systems’’’

V. S. Anishchenko, T. E. Vadivasova, and O. SosnovtsevaPhysics Department, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya Street 83, Saratov, 410071, Russia

~Received 26 March 1997!

We discuss the appearance of a strange nonchaotic attractor in a wide class of dynamical systems when thedestruction of ergodic torus takes place.@S1063-651X~97!11210-7#

PACS number~s!: 05.45.1b, 02.60.Cb

o-nd

ruydr

nsno

ur

in

-nismsave

t’’to

hee

in

Let us consider the problem of existence of strange nchaotic attractors~SNA! in a wide class of dynamical systems from two points of view: the theory of oscillations abifurcation theory.

In @1–3# the appearance of SNA is associated with a todestruction and described as a route from quasiperiodicitchaos. Therefore systems where SNA is observed shoulcharacterized by the presence of at least two incommensufrequencies with irrational ratio. Quasiperiodic oscillatiocan be generated in different ways. It is known that regioof ergodic quasiperiodic motion in the parameter spaceautonomous and periodically driven systems as well asquasiperiodically driven systems have nonzero meas

561063-651X/97/56~6!/7322~1!/$10.00

n-

stobeate

sf

ine.

Hence nothing seems to prevent the existence of SNAthose systems.

In @4# the collision of a period-doubled torus with its unstable parent has been suggested as one of the mechafor the creation of strange nonchaotic attractors. We hfound such bifurcation at some values of parameters@5#. Butaccording to the accurate calculations from the ‘‘Commenit does not lead to SNA. Is this bifurcation unknown upnow and leading to the appearance of a chaotic set?

We took into account the valuable remarks from t‘‘Comment’’ concerning numerical experiments. But wproceeded to present evidence of the existence of SNAautonomous and periodically driven systems.

va,

@1# C. Grebogi, E. Ott, S. Pelikan, and J. A. Yorke, Physica D13,261 ~1984!.

@2# M. Ding, C. Grebogi, and E. Ott, Phys. Rev. A39, 2593~1989!.

@3# U. Feudel, J. Kurths, and A. Pikovsky, Physica D88,

176 ~1995!.@4# J. F. Heagy and S. M. Hammel, Physica D70, 140 ~1994!.@5# V. S. Anishchenko, T. E. Vadivasova, and O. Sosnovtse

Phys. Rev. E54, 3231~1996!.

7322 © 1997 The American Physical Society