REPORT - City of Pickering Land Development ... Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of ... 2011. The applicable site condition standards were selected

December 9, 2015

Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment, 1484-1498 Altona Road, Pickering, Ontario

REPO

RT

Report Number: 1536748

Distribution: 2 Copies - Altona Home Construction Inc. (c/o Geranium Corporation) 1 Copy - Golder Associates Ltd.

Submitted to: Ms. Shauna Dudding Altona Home Construction Inc. c/o Geranium Corporation 3190 Steeles Avenue, East Suite 300 Markham, Ontario L3R 1G9

PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

Table of Contents

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................. 1

2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 1

2.1 Site Description .................................................................................................................................................... 1

2.2 Property Ownership ............................................................................................................................................. 1

2.3 Current and Proposed Future Uses ..................................................................................................................... 2

2.4 Applicable Site Condition Standard ..................................................................................................................... 2

3.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ...................................................................................................................................... 2

3.1 Physical Setting ................................................................................................................................................... 3

3.2 Past Investigations ............................................................................................................................................... 3

3.2.1 Phase One ESA ............................................................................................................................................. 4

4.0 SCOPE OF THE INVESTIGATION ................................................................................................................................... 4

4.1 Overview of Site Investigation.............................................................................................................................. 4

4.2 Media Investigated ............................................................................................................................................... 5

4.3 Phase One Conceptual Site Model ...................................................................................................................... 5

4.4 Deviations from Sampling and Analysis Plan....................................................................................................... 7

4.5 Impediments ........................................................................................................................................................ 7

5.0 INVESTIGATION METHOD .............................................................................................................................................. 7

5.1 General ................................................................................................................................................................ 7

5.2 Drilling .................................................................................................................................................................. 7

5.3 Test Pitting ........................................................................................................................................................... 8

5.4 Soil: Sampling ...................................................................................................................................................... 8

5.5 Field Screening Measurements ........................................................................................................................... 8

5.6 Groundwater: Monitoring Well Installation ........................................................................................................... 9

5.7 Groundwater: Field Measurements for Water Quality Parameters ...................................................................... 9

5.8 Groundwater: Sampling ..................................................................................................................................... 10

5.9 Sediment: Sampling ........................................................................................................................................... 10

5.10 Analytical Testing ............................................................................................................................................... 10

5.11 Residue Management Procedures .................................................................................................................... 10

December 9, 2015 Report No. 1536748 i


5.12 Elevation Surveying ........................................................................................................................................... 10

5.13 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Measures ............................................................................................. 11

6.0 REVIEW AND EVALUATION ......................................................................................................................................... 12

6.1 Geology ............................................................................................................................................................. 12

6.2 Groundwater: Elevations and Flow Direction ..................................................................................................... 12

6.3 Groundwater: Hydraulic Gradients ..................................................................................................................... 13

6.4 Coarse Soil Texture ........................................................................................................................................... 13

6.5 Soil: Field Screening .......................................................................................................................................... 13

6.6 Soil: Quality........................................................................................................................................................ 13

6.7 Groundwater: Quality ......................................................................................................................................... 14

6.8 Sediment: Quality .............................................................................................................................................. 14

6.9 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Results ................................................................................................. 14

6.10 Phase Two Conceptual Site Model .................................................................................................................... 15

7.0 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................................................................. 18

8.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................................ 18

9.0 LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................................................................. 18

10.0 SIGNATURES ................................................................................................................................................................. 19

TABLES No table of figures entries found.

Table 1 – Monitoring Well Construction Details

Table 2 – Groundwater Elevations (August 31, 2015)

Table 3 – Summary of Soil Samples Submitted for Laboratory Analysis

Table 4 – Summary of Groundwater Samples Submitted for Laboratory Analysis

Table 5A – Soil Analytical Results: Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fractions 1 to 4

Table 5B – Soil Analytical Results: Metals

Table 5C – Soil Analytical Results: Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Table 5D – Soil Analytical Results: pH

Table 6A – Groundwater Analytical Results: Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fractions 1 to 4

December 9, 2015 Report No. 1536748 ii


FIGURES No table of figures entries found.

Figure 1 – Key Plan

Figure 2 – Phase Two Property Plan

Figure 3 –Groundwater Elevations

Figure 4 – Interpreted Cross Section A – A’

Figure 5 – Interpreted Cross Section B – B’

APPENDICES APPENDIX A (i) Sampling and Analysis Plan

APPENDIX A (ii) Grain Size

APPENDIX A (iii) Borehole and Test Pit Logs

APPENDIX A (iv) Laboratory Certificates of Analysis

APPENDIX A (v) Plan of Survey

APPENDIX A (Vii) Phase One Conceptual Site Model

December 9, 2015 Report No. 1536748 iii


1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Golder Associates Ltd. (“Golder”) was retained by Altona Home Construction Inc. to conduct a Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment (“Phase Two ESA”) of the property located at 1484-1498 Altona Road, Pickering, Ontario (hereinafter referred to as the “Site” and the “Phase Two Property”), as shown on Figure 1. The legal description of the Site is: Part of Lot 33, B.F.C Range 3, (40R-9096, Part 5 & 40M-1515, Blocks 84, 85 & 86) Part of Lot 33, B.F.C Range 3, (40R-5045, Part 1) City of Pickering.

Golder previously completed a Phase One ESA for the Site, the results of which were documented in Golder Report No. 1536748 entitled, “Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, 1484-1498 Altona Road, Pickering Ontario”, dated December 9, 2014. Based on the findings of the Phase One ESA, Golder completed this Phase Two ESA investigation for the property. This report provides the findings of the Phase Two ESA for the Site.

The analytical results from samples collected and submitted as part of this investigation indicate that all parameters tested in soil and groundwater meet the applicable Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (“MOECC”) Table 2 Standards under O. Reg. 153/04.

2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 Site Description Golder was retained by Altona Home Construction Inc. to conduct a Phase Two ESA of the following property:

Municipal Address 1484-1498 Altona Road

Property Identification Numbers (“PINs”)

26302-0356 (LT) 26302-0370 (LT) 26302-0372 (LT) 26302-0376 (LT) 26302-0378 (LT)

Legal Description Part of Lot 33, B.F.C Range 3, (40R-9096, Part 5 & 40M-1515, Blocks 84, 85 & 86) Part of Lot 33, B.F.C Range 3, (40R-5045, Part 1) City of Pickering.

Size of the Phase Two Property 1.9 acre (0.776 hectare) parcel of land with a 2,190 ft2 (203 m2) residential building

The Site location is provided on Figure 1. A Site plan is provided on Figure 2 and 3. The boundaries of the Phase Two Property are provided in Figure 2.

2.2 Property Ownership The contact information for the Phase Two Property owner is as follows:

Site Owner / Client Address Contact Information

Client: Altona Home Construction Inc. Site Owner: Altona Land Development Corporation: (26302-0370 (LT); 26302-0372 (LT); 26302-0376 (LT); and 26302-0378 (LT)) The Corporation of the City of Pickering: (26302-0356 (LT))

3190 Steeles Avenue East Unit 300 Markham, Ontario L3R 1G9

Mr. Derrick Canete, P.Eng. Office: (905) 477-1177 x256 Email: [email protected]

December 9, 2015 Report No. 1536748 1


Authorization to proceed with this investigation was received from Ms. Shauna Dudding of Altona Home Construction Inc. on July 13, 2015.

2.3 Current and Proposed Future Uses The Site consists of a 1.9 acre (0.776 hectare) parcel of land with a 2,190 ft2 (203 m2) residential building. The Phase Two Property is to be subdivided and developed with residential dwellings. The Site has been owned by Altona Land Development Corporation since September 1, 2015 with the exception of PIN 26302-0356 (LT) which has been owned by the Corporation of the City of Pickering since February 5, 1988.

2.4 Applicable Site Condition Standard The analytical results of the samples collected for this Phase Two ESA were compared to the Table 2 generic site condition standards (residential property use, coarse soil texture) presented in the Ministry of Environment (“MOE”) “Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act”, dated April 15, 2011. The applicable site condition standards were selected based on the following rationale:

Four water wells were identified within a 250 m radius of the Site which were reported to be for domestic use;

The Site is not located in an area designated in a municipal official plan as a well-head protection area or other designation identified by the municipality for the protection of ground water;

Based on field observations and the results of grain size analysis presented in Appendix A(iii), the native soil materials are considered to be coarse textured;

Surface soil at the property has a pH value that is not less than 5 or greater than 9. Subsurface soil at the property has a pH value that is not less than 5 or greater than 11;

The closest water body is Petticoat Creek located approximately 360 m east to south east of the Phase Two Property;

There are no features on the Phase Two Property that would meet the conditions of an environmentally sensitive site, as described in Section 41;

The intended land use for the Phase Two Property is residential; and,

The overburden thickness is greater than 2 metres over more than one-third of the Phase Two Property.

3.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION This section presents the background conditions of the Phase Two Property including a description of the physical setting and a summary of past investigations conducted.

The objectives of the Phase Two ESA were to obtain information about environmental conditions in the soil and groundwater on, in or under the Site, and to develop the information necessary to complete a Record of Site Condition (“RSC”) for the property. The objectives of this Phase Two ESA were achieved by:

Developing an understanding of the geological and hydrogeological conditions at the Site; and,



Conducting field sampling for all contaminants of concern (“COC”) associated with all areas of potential environmental concern identified at the Site.

3.1 Physical Setting The nearest surface water body is Petticoat Creek located approximately 360 m east to south east of the Site. Lake Ontario is located approximately 3 km southeast of the Phase Two Property. There are no identified areas of natural significance within the Phase Two Study area. Land uses surrounding the Phase Two Property are residential and institutional, as shown in Figure 2.

The topography of the Phase Two Property and surrounding areas is generally flat. There are no surface water drainage features on the Site.

3.2 Past Investigations “2006 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report”, Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd, May 1, 2006.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Altona Road and Twyn Rivers Drive Pickering, Ontario (10-06609-01-ESA), prepared for Hollywood Properties Limited; and

“Geo-Technical Investigation Report”, Coffey Geotechnics Inc., March 10, 2013. Geo-Technical Investigation Report, Hayes Line Group of Companies, Proposed Subdivision SP-2005-03 Altona Road and Twyn Rivers Drive, Pickering, Ontario, prepared for Hayes Line Group of Companies.

2006 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report Based on Golder’s review of the 2006 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, the following are of note for the Site:

The 2006 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment report was completed for only the northern portion of the 2015 Phase One ESA Site. The portion of the Site with the house on it was not included in the 2006 investigation;

The Site was undeveloped and vacant located in a residential/institutional land area. The subject property was approximately 0.72 hectares bounded by Twyn Rivers Drive and Altona Road;

During the Site visit, inert fill material including concrete, gravel/soil, and rock were observed on the Phase I Property, although no adverse impacts were expected from this material; and

Based on the results of the historical review and observations during the Site visit, there were no areas of potential environmental concern associated with the Site and therefore no additional environmental investigations were recommended.

Geo-Technical Investigation Report Based on Golder’s review of the 2013 Geo-Technical Investigation Report, the following are of note for the Site:

Geotechnical investigations were completed with the understanding that the project at the Site would consist of a residential building, including a maximum three storey structure with one level of basement, at grade parking/access roads and underground utility services. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the subsurface conditions with boreholes; the scope of this investigation did not include a hydrogeological study;



According to Ontario Geological Survey Map 2556, Quaternary Geology of Southern Ontario, the subject site is in an area of fine-texture glaciolacustrine deposits of silt and clay, with minor sand and gravel. Ground water seepage was observed in boreholes between 6.1, 0.9 and 1.5 m below ground surface; and

Field work was carried out in March 2013 where four boreholes were advanced in the landscaped area surrounding the existing one storey brick building structure.

3.2.1 Phase One ESA Golder recently conducted a Phase One ESA entitled, “Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, 1484-1498 Altona Road, Pickering Ontario”, dated December 9, 2015 to assess the likelihood of soil and/or groundwater contamination resulting from historic or present activities at the Site and surrounding area. This included a review of available historical information on the Site and surrounding area, interviews with persons familiar with the Site and a Site reconnaissance. The APECs identified in the 2015 Phase One ESA are summarized in the following table:

Area of Potential Environmental Concern

Location of Area of Potential Environmental Concern on Phase One Property

Potentially Contaminating Activity

Location of PCA (on-Site or off-Site)

Contaminants of Potential Concern

Media Potentially Impacted (Groundwater, Soil and/or Sediment)

1. Fill (entire Site) Entire Site.

#30. Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality

On-Site Metals, PAHs Soil

2. South east corner of the residential dwelling

An AST is located on the basement floor of the residential building, to the southeast corner (1484 Altona Road).

#28. Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks

On-Site PHCs Soil and

Groundwater

Notes: PCA potentially contaminating activity as listed O.Reg. 153/04, Schedule D, Table 2 PHC petroleum hydrocarbon compound fractions PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons This report was prepared by the Qualified Person and will be relied upon for the Phase Two investigation.

4.0 SCOPE OF THE INVESTIGATION 4.1 Overview of Site Investigation The Phase Two ESA investigation activities were completed between August 19, 2015 and September 8, 2015 and included the following tasks:

Health and Safety Plan: Preparation of a Health and Safety Plan for internal and subcontractor use prior to initiating any field work at the Site;



Utility Clearances: Coordination of utility clearances with local utility companies along with retaining the services of a private locator to assess for possible services in the areas of the proposed test locations;

Borehole Advancement and Monitoring Well Installation: The borehole drilling and monitoring well installation program included drilling of four boreholes, three of which were completed as groundwater monitoring wells, which were used for groundwater sampling at the Site. The rationale for the selected location of the boreholes is provided in the sampling and analysis plan provided in Appendix A(i). The location of the boreholes and monitoring wells are shown on Figure 2. The monitoring well construction details are presented in Table 1;

Test Pitting: The test pitting program included the excavation of one test pit which was completed on September 8, 2015. The location of the test pit is shown on Figure 2;

Soil Sampling: Selected soil samples were collected on August 19, 2015 and September 8, 2015 from the boreholes and test pit. Soil samples were submitted for chemical analysis of one or more of the following; petroleum hydrocarbonss (“PHCs”), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (“PAHs”), and metals;

Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling: Groundwater samples were collected on September 1, 2015. Groundwater samples were submitted for PHC analysis;

Surveying: A survey for the boreholes and monitoring wells advanced as part of the Phase Two ESA investigation was carried out by Golder to ascertain relative elevations; and

Reporting: Golder compiled and assessed the field and laboratory results from the above noted activities into this report.

The Phase Two investigation was carried out in general accordance with Golder’s standard operating procedures, which conform to the requirements of O. Reg. 153/04. The data from the Phase Two ESA investigation completed by Golder at the Site were incorporated into a single Phase Two ESA report following the Phase Two ESA report format required under O. Reg. 153/04.

There were no impediments or access limitations that would affect the conclusions of this Phase Two ESA report.

4.2 Media Investigated To address the potential environmental issues identified in the Phase One ESA, the Phase Two ESA field program included sampling of subsurface soil and of groundwater from wells screened within the overburden at the Site. No sediment was present at the Site and therefore no sediment sampling was completed. A summary of media investigated and the applicable contaminants of potential concern are provided in Tables 3 and 4. The sampling and analysis plan outlines the rationale for the field investigation activities carried out at the Site and the associated methodologies used to meet the objectives of this Phase Two ESA.

4.3 Phase One Conceptual Site Model The Phase One ESA conceptual site model described below, is based on the results of the September 2015 Phase One ESA investigation.



The Site consisted of a parcel of land with an area of 1.9 acres (0.776 hectare) located at 1484 – 1498 Altona Road which was largely undeveloped with the exception of one residential building approximately 2,190 ft2 (203 m2) in size located in the southern portion of the Site. The lost occupied by the residential dwelling was located at the municipal address 1484 Altona Road;

The Site has been owned by Altona Land Development Corporation since September 1, 2015 with the exception of PIN 26302-0356 (LT) which has been owned by the Corporation of the City of Pickering since February 5, 1988;

Petticoat Creek is located approximately 360 m east to south east of the Site and Lake Ontario 3 km to the south east;

Potable water in the vicinity of the Site is provided by the Regional Municipality of Durham and is obtained from Lake Ontario. No potable water wells were identified on the Phase One Property. One active domestic well was reported east of the Phase One Property, within the Phase One Study Area. This well was reportedly installed in 1965;

At the time of the Phase One ESA, the Site was developed with a vacant residential dwelling and undeveloped land to the north. Historically, the Site has been used solely for agricultural purposes since up to 1960. There are no indications that the Phase One Property was used for an industrial use or any of the following commercial uses: commercial vehicle garage, retail bulk liquid dispensing facility, or dry cleaning facility;

At the time of the Phase One ESA Site visit, the neighbouring properties within the Phase One Study Area consisted of residential and institutional land uses. There are no indications that neighbouring properties in the Phase One Study Area were used for an industrial use or any of the following commercial uses: commercial vehicle garage, retail bulk liquid dispensing facility, or dry cleaning facility;

The following PCAs were identified in the Phase One Study area:

#30. Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality – Fill is reportedly present throughout the Site. The PCA is located on the Phase One Property and must be identified as an APEC;

#28. Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks – A heating oil tank (“AST”) is located on the basement level of the Site building. The PCA is located on the Phase One Property and must be identified as an APEC; and

#46. Railyards, Tracks and Spurs – A Canadian National Railway corridor is located approximately 100 m north of the Site. The nature of impacts associated with this PCA typically does not migrate through groundwater and are not anticipated to impact the Phase One Property.

Underground gas utilities for heating system are inferred to be present at the Phase One Property for providing natural gas heating;

Native soil at the Site is anticipated to consist primarily of till comprising of predominantly sand to silty sand; and



Local groundwater is anticipated to flow in an east to southeast direction towards Petticoat Creek (located approximately 360 m east of the Site), and regional groundwater is anticipated to flow in a southeast direction towards Lake Ontario (located 3 km south of the Site).

4.4 Deviations from Sampling and Analysis Plan A sampling and analysis plan is provided in Appendix A(i). The sampling and analysis plan outlines the rationale for the field investigation activities carried out at the Site and the associated methodologies used to meet the objectives of this Phase Two ESA. The following deviation from the sampling and analysis plan occurred:

During borehole drilling activities on August 19, 2015, no soil sample was collected from below the depth of the basement of the residence located on the southwest corner of the Phase Two Property to address APEC 2. On September 8, 2015 a test pit was excavated adjacent to the southeast corner of the Site and a soil sample was collected from below the depth of the basement floor slab for analysis. The test pit sample allowed for Golder to collect a soil sample closer to the house than would have been possible with the borehole.

4.5 Impediments No physical impediments to the Phase Two ESA investigation were encountered. Access to the Phase Two Property was not denied or restricted.

5.0 INVESTIGATION METHOD 5.1 General The following sections describe the pre-field work activities and field investigation methodology employed during the Phase Two ESA conducted at the Site. The field work was conducted between August 19, 2015 and September 8, 2015.

Prior to initiating the field work, Golder developed and implemented Site-specific protocols to protect the health and safety of its employees and subcontractors through the preparation of a Site-specific Health and Safety Plan. An assessment of potential health and safety hazards at the Phase Two Property and those associated with the proposed work was completed each day of the field program. A health and safety tail gate meeting was held with Golder’s subcontractors each day prior to completion of the field work. The document was reviewed and signed on-Site by field personnel prior to commencing work. Additionally, prior to any intrusive investigations, including drilling, Golder completed public and private utility clearances.

5.2 Drilling On August 19, 2015 three boreholes (BH15-2, BH15-3, and BH15-4) were advanced at the Site. Borehole locations are provided in Figure 2. An additional borehole, (BH15-1) was advanced on-Site on August 19, 2015 for geotechnical purposes as part of the concurrent geotechnical investigation.

Boreholes were advanced by Strong Soil Search (“Strong Soil”) using a track mounted CME 55 drill rig. During borehole drilling activities, overburden soil samples were collected using split spoon soil sampling equipment and 220 mm outside diameter (“OD”) hollow stem augers, with the exception of BH15-1 where 110 mm OD solid stem augers were used.

Continuous soil samples were collected using the following method:



Split-spoon: 0.61 m (2 foot) long, 5.08 cm (2 inch) diameter stainless steel split spoon sampling system at 0.76 m intervals. Split-spoons were decontaminated between sample locations.

The boreholes were advanced to depths ranging from 5.74 to 6.25 m below ground surface (“bgs”).

5.3 Test Pitting One test pit was advanced at the Site on September 8, 2015. The test pit was advanced to address the deviation from the SAP regarding collection of a soil sample from below the depth of the basement of the residence. The test pit was advanced to a total depth of 3.51 mbgs. The test pit was excavated by using a CASE 580 rubber tire backhoe. The test pit location is provided in Figure 2. During test pit excavation, undisturbed overburden soil samples were retrieved directly from the side walls of the test pit or from the excavator bucket using a clean, gloved hand and/or trowel at regular depth intervals (0.3 m). Excavated material was replaced back into the test pit and was loosely compacted with the backhoe bucket.

5.4 Soil: Sampling Soil samples were split in the field into two components. One component of each sample was placed into laboratory supplied sample jars and stored in a cooler with ice for possible subsequent chemical analysis. The second component of the sample was placed inside a labelled plastic bag for subsequent field headspace screening. When handling all soil samples, a clean gloved hand was used and all equipment in contact with soils was decontaminated between sampling locations to minimize the potential for cross-contamination.

The subsurface soil conditions within the boreholes were described in terms of their texture, presence of staining, odour and debris, if any. Geologic descriptions of soil samples are presented in the Record of Borehole sheets (Appendix A(ii)).

All soil samples collected and submitted for chemical analysis were obtained from undisturbed soils, including fill materials and native overburden, from the Site by borehole drilling methods. Nitrile gloves were worn when handling soil samples and all equipment in contact with soils was washed between sample locations to prevent the potential of cross contamination. Two soil samples were submitted as part of this investigation for grain size analysis to support the use of the coarse textured soil site condition standard for use at the Site.

As per the sampling and analysis plan, provided in Appendix A(i), a minimum of one soil sample was submitted from each test location. Where field evidence of potential impacts were observed, an additional soil sample was submitted for chemical analysis to vertically delineate impacts, where possible.

Soil samples representative of “worst-case” conditions were selected for chemical analysis were based on visual (e.g., staining, discolouration and/or free product, if any) and/or olfactory (if any) observations obtained from borehole drilling activities. Otherwise, if no visual or olfactory observations were noted, the highest recorded field screening reading was used to determine which soil sample to submit for analysis from each test location.

5.5 Field Screening Measurements Field measurements of sample headspace concentration were made using the following equipment:



Equipment Make and

Model Parameters

Detected Detection

Limits Precision Accuracy

Calibration Standard

Calibration Procedure

RKI Eagle Eagle 2

Combustible gas

0 - 50,000 ppm N/A +/- 5% Hexane

By supplier prior to

fieldwork & by Golder Associates field staff

during work VOCs 0 - 2,000

ppm N/A +/- 5% Isobutylene

One soil sample representing “worst-case” conditions at each sampling location was selected for laboratory analysis based on the soil headspace screening measurements, visual observations (e.g., staining, discoloration and/or free product, if any), and olfactory observations (if any).

5.6 Groundwater: Monitoring Well Installation Three groundwater monitoring wells (BH15-2, BH15-3, and BH15-4) were installed by Strong Soil using threaded 50 mm diameter, schedule 40, polyvinyl chloride (“PVC”) well screens and riser pipe, which were brought to the Site in sealed plastic bags. The annulus surrounding the screened portion of the well and an approximately 0.3 m portion of the riser pipe above the slotted pipe was filled with silica filter sand. The monitoring well was completed with a stick up style protective well casing set in concrete and sealed by bentonite from the top of the sand pack up to the base of the concrete around the protective well casing. The riser pipes were sealed with a J-plug.

Following drilling, the monitoring wells were developed on August 31, 2015 by removing up to ten well volumes, or by removing one well volume if the well was considered a “low yield” monitoring well, using dedicated Waterra® pumps (tubing with foot valves). During monitoring well development, qualitative observations were made of water colour, clarity, and the presence or absence of any hydrocarbon sheen or odours.

Monitoring well construction details are summarized in Table 1 and presented in the Record of Borehole sheets (Appendix A(iii)).

5.7 Groundwater: Field Measurements for Water Quality Parameters Groundwater indicator parameters including temperature, pH and conductivity, were measured prior to sampling to ensure adequate well development and purging. A Hanna HI 9828 water quality meter was used to measure groundwater quality during monitoring well development and groundwater sampling. The instrument was calibrated using factory supplied solutions for electrical conductivity (1413 micro Siemens per centimetre (µS/cm)) and pH (pH 4.01 and pH 7.01) parameters.

Observations of water quality (i.e., colour, clarity) and evidence of chemical impact in the purge water (e.g., odour, sheen) were also noted. Groundwater levels were measured prior to well development and groundwater sampling.



5.8 Groundwater: Sampling Prior to sample collection, the monitoring wells were purged using dedicated Waterra® pumps (tubing with foot valves). During purging, qualitative observations were made of water colour, clarity, and the presence or absence of any hydrocarbon sheen or odour. Monitoring wells were purged prior to sample collection by pumping at least three well volumes or, where the well was considered a “low-yield” monitoring well, by purging at least one half of the well volume. Groundwater sampling was carried out at the Site on September 1, 2015.

Samples were placed in laboratory-prepared containers and stored on ice, in a cooler until delivery to AGAT Laboratories (“AGAT”). Samples were analyzed for PHCs following chain-of-custody procedures. A summary of the groundwater samples submitted for analysis in presented in Table 4.

5.9 Sediment: Sampling No sediment samples were collected as part of this investigation.

5.10 Analytical Testing Soil and groundwater analyses were conducted by AGAT. The contact information for the analytical laboratory is included below.

AGAT Laboratories 5835 Coopers Avenue

Mississauga, Ontario, L4Z 1Y2 Laboratory Contact: Sandra Consulta

905-712-5106

The analytical laboratory is accredited in accordance with the International Standard ISO/IEC 17025 (CALA) (General Requirement for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories, May 5, 2005, as amended) and the standards for proficiency testing developed by the Standards Council of Canada, the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation or another accreditation body accepted by the MOECC.

5.11 Residue Management Procedures All residues produced during the investigation (soil cuttings from drilling, groundwater from well development purging, wash water from equipment decontamination) were placed in sealed drums and stored on-Site for disposal by the owner.

5.12 Elevation Surveying A geodetic elevation survey for the boreholes and monitoring wells advanced as part of the Phase Two ESA was not available at the time this report was prepared. As such, an elevation of 100 metres above local datum (“mald”) was assumed for the top nut of the fire hydrant located to the east of Altona Road in front of the residential property located at 1477 Altona Road (649921.4 m E, 4853212 m N) and all elevations were taken relative to the fire hydrant.

Groundwater levels were monitored in three monitoring wells to determine groundwater flow direction and were measured relative to the elevation of the top of the PVC riser pipe.



5.13 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Measures Golder’s quality assurance program for environmental investigations was implemented to ensure that analytical data obtained by the investigation were valid and representative. The quality assurance program included the following measures:

The use of standard operating procedures for all field investigation activities;

All monitoring wells were developed following installation to remove fine particles from the filter pack and any fluids introduced during drilling;

Monitoring wells were appropriately purged prior to groundwater sample collection to remove stagnant water from the well bore and improve sample representativeness, minimizing sample agitation and aeration to the extent practicable;

The collection of field duplicate samples at a minimum frequency of one duplicate for every ten samples;

Initial calibration of field equipment was performed at the start of each field day, with a daily checks of calibration, as needed, using a standard of known concentration;

Soil and groundwater samples were handled and stored in accordance with the sample collection and preservation requirement of the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties Under Part XV.I of the Environmental Protection Act, July 1, 2011. Samples were collected directly into pre-cleaned, laboratory-supplied sample containers with the appropriate preservative for the analyte group. Upon collection, samples were placed in insulated coolers with ice for storage and transport to the analytical laboratory under chain-of-custody;

Dedicated sampling equipment (tubing and footvalves) and clean disposable Nitrile™ gloves were used at each sampling location to prevent cross-contamination. All non-dedicated sampling equipment (e.g., water level meters, split spoons) was decontaminated between sampling locations. Sampling equipment in contact with soil, groundwater, or sediment was: cleaned by mechanical means; washed with a laboratory-grade detergent (e.g., phosphate-free LiquiNox or AlcoNox) and, if necessary, an appropriate desorbing wash solution; and thoroughly rinsed with analyte-free water;

Detailed field records documenting the methods and circumstances of collection for each field sample were prepared at the time of sample collection. Each sample was assigned a unique sample identification number recorded in the field notes, along with the date and time of sample collection, the sample matrix, and the requested analyses; and

The submission of samples to the analytical laboratory in accordance with standard chain of custody procedures.

Below is a summary of the primary and duplicate samples collected between August 19, 2015 and September 8, 2015.



Date Soil Samples Collected Duplicates

August 19, 2015 and September 8,

2015

BH15-2 SA1, BH15-2 SA3, BH15-3 SA1 BH15-3 SA4, BH15-3 SA5, BH15-4 SA2,

TP-04 SA4, Dup 1 (BH15-3 SA1)

Date Groundwater Samples Collected Duplicates

September 1, 2015 BH15-2 Dup 3 (BH15-2) The RKI Eagle used to screen soil samples for combustible vapours was calibrated prior to initial use by Golder. Regular calibration checks were performed on the RKI Eagle using hexane gas and recalibrated as necessary. A Hanna HI 9828 water quality metre was used to measure water quality parameters during well development and sampling and was calibrated before use each day. Calibration checks were conducted using pH solutions of 4.0 and 7.0 and an EC solution of 1413 µS/cm and recalibrated as necessary.

6.0 REVIEW AND EVALUATION This section of the report presents a review and evaluation of the results of the drilling, monitoring and sampling activities conducted as part of the Phase Two ESA.

6.1 Geology The soil conditions encountered during the borehole drilling are presented in the Record of Borehole sheets and provided in Appendix A(ii), as well as in the cross-sections presented in Figure 6 and 7, with the cross section location shown on Figure 2. The following presents a summary of the subsurface soil conditions encountered during the investigation.

Boreholes were advanced to a maximum depth of 6.25 mbgs. In general, the subsurface soil conditions consisted of a layer of topsoil ranging from 25 to 61 cm in thickness which was present at surface at all borehole locations with the exception of BH15-3. Beneath the topsoil consisted of a layer of fill material. Fill materials generally consisted of sandy silt to sand extending to a maximum depth of 1.83 mbgs. The fill was underlain by native clayey silt to silty clay. Sandy silt was encountered below the clayey silt to silty clay unit, extending to the maximum depth of drilling. The native overburden thickness was observed to be at least 6.25 m at the Site, but is anticipated to extend beyond the maximum depth of drilling. Bedrock was not encountered during drilling.

6.2 Groundwater: Elevations and Flow Direction The base of shallow groundwater monitoring well screen intervals were installed at elevations ranging from approximately 92.65 mald (6.09 mbgs) to 93.085 mald (6.09 mbgs). The location and depth of the screens were selected based on the issues being investigated, and were installed to straddle the water table. A summary of the monitoring well construction details are presented in Table 1. No evidence of petroleum hydrocarbon free product or sheen in groundwater was observed.

Groundwater elevations were calculated by subtracting the depth to groundwater from the reference point elevation and are summarized in Table 2. Groundwater elevations at the Site ranged from 96.68 mald (BH15-2) to 97.53 mald (BH15-3) (2.06 m to 1.64 mbgs) on August 31, 2015. Based on the interpreted groundwater elevation contours presented in Figure 3, the inferred direction of groundwater flow is to the southeast (towards



Petticoat Creek). All monitoring wells were used in the interpretation of shallow groundwater contours and shallow groundwater flow direction.

Seasonal fluctuation in groundwater levels should be expected. Given the limited number of monitoring events seasonal trends could not be identified; however shallow groundwater levels are typically highest following the spring recharge and decline throughout the summer and fall months into the winter.

Foundation structures associated with the Site building and a basement in the southwestern corner. The presence of subsurface utilities and structures at the Site are not expected to act as preferential pathways promoting the migration of COCs as the water table is not inferred to intercept buried utilities and subsurface structures at the Phase Two Property and no COCs are present in groundwater exceeding the Site condition standards.

6.3 Groundwater: Hydraulic Gradients The horizontal hydraulic gradient was estimated for shallow groundwater conditions based on water levels collected on August 31, 2015 and the inferred groundwater contours are presented on Figure 3. The estimated horizontal hydraulic gradient for shallow groundwater conditions is 0.027 m/m.

Vertical hydraulic gradients were not calculated as no COCs were identified in groundwater exceeding the site condition standards and as such, no nested monitoring wells were installed at the Site.

6.4 Coarse Soil Texture Two representative soil samples (BH15-2 SA6 and BH14-4 SA8) were collected from native overburden materials and submitted to Golder’s geotechnical laboratory in Whitby, Ontario for a 75 µm sieve wash test. The test results are provided in Appendix A(ii). The two samples were considered to be sufficient, given that native soil encountered during the Phase Two ESA was homogeneous across the Site.

Based on field observations, borehole stratigraphy and the sieve analysis results, more than 50% of particles (by mass) in the soil were equal to or greater than 75 µm in mean diameter. Accordingly, the Site soil is considered to be coarse-textured.

6.5 Soil: Field Screening Headspace vapour measurements were conducted on the soil samples collected from boreholes BH15-2 to BH15-4. Combustible gas and organic vapour measurements were not detected.

The results of headspace vapour measurements are presented on the Record of Borehole sheets in Appendix A(iii).

6.6 Soil: Quality Table 3 provides a summary of the soil samples submitted for analysis and the associated test parameters. The analytical results of soil samples are presented in Tables 5A to 5D. Laboratory Certificates of Analysis for the soil samples are included in Appendix A(iv).

A summary of the number of soil samples analysed and the number of soil samples exceeding the MOE Table 2 Standards is provided below:



Parameter Number of soil

samples analysed

Number of soil samples exceeding the Table 2

Standards

PAHs 3 0 Metals 5 0 PHCs 2 0

All soil samples submitted for analysis met the applicable Site condition standards, for the parameters tested.

6.7 Groundwater: Quality Monitoring well construction details are summarized in Table 1 and a list of groundwater samples submitted for laboratory analysis is provided in Table 4. The analytical results for groundwater samples are summarized in Table 6A, along with the applicable MOE Table 2 Standards. Laboratory Certificates of Analysis for groundwater are provided in Appendix A(iv).

A summary of the number of groundwater samples analysed and number of samples exceeding the MOE Table 2 Standards is provided below:

Parameter Number of

groundwater samples analysed

Number of groundwater samples exceeding the 2011

Table 2 Standards

PHC F1-F4 2 0 All groundwater samples submitted for analysis met the applicable Site condition standards, for the parameters tested.

In addition to numerical standards, the MOECC sets out non-numerical (aesthetic) standards for groundwater relating to the presence of free phase product and hydrocarbon sheen. Specifically, a property does not meet the site condition standards if there is evidence of free product, including but not limited to, visible petroleum hydrocarbon film or sheen present on groundwater, surface water or in any groundwater or surface water samples. No evidence of free product or sheen in groundwater was observed.

6.8 Sediment: Quality No sediment samples were collected as part of this investigation.

6.9 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Results The quality assurance assessment of the field duplicate sample results was conducted according to the document entitled Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, March 9, 2004 (amended in July 2009 and effective as of July 1, 2011) (“Analytical Protocol”).



To determine the precision of the analytical methods and field sampling procedures, blind duplicate samples were collected during soil and groundwater sampling. Precision is determined by the relative percent difference (“RPD”) between the duplicate and original samples and was calculated as follows:

𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 = |𝑥𝑥1−𝑥𝑥2|𝑥𝑥𝑚𝑚

Where x1 initial sample results x2 duplicate sample results xm mean of x1, x2

The analytical results of the primary and duplicate soil and groundwater samples indicated a satisfactory correlation between the primary and duplicate samples, and were within the 30% recommended control limit in the Analytical Protocol.

All certificates of analysis or analytical reports received pursuant to clause 47 (2) (b) of the regulation comply with subsection 47(3). A certificate of analysis or analytical report has been received for each sample submitted for analysis and is provided in Appendix A(iii). The analytical laboratory did not qualify any of the analytical results.

Accordingly, the analytical data generated during the investigation are valid and representative and may be used in this Phase Two ESA without further qualification.

6.10 Phase Two Conceptual Site Model The Phase Two conceptual site model is presented in the following sections.

POTENTIAL SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION Potentially Contaminating Activities Based on the information obtained as part of the Phase One ESA, the following potentially contaminating activities (“PCAs”) were identified. The location of each PCA is provided on Figure 2:

Location Potentially Contaminating Activity

Information Source

Rationale for Potential Contribution of the PCA to an APEC

Phase One Property

#30. Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality – Fill is reportedly present throughout the Site.

Previous report and Site observations

The PCA is located on the Phase One Property and must be identified as an APEC.

Phase One Property

#28. Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks – A heating oil tank (“AST”) is located on the basement level of the Site building.

Site observations

The PCA is located on the Phase One Property and must be identified as an APEC.

Phase One Study Area (excluding the Phase One Property)

#46. Railyards, Tracks and Spurs – A Canadian National Railway corridor is located approximately 100 m north of the Site.

Aerial photographs

The nature of impacts associated with this PCA typically does not migrate through groundwater and are not anticipated to impact the Phase One Property.



Areas of Potential Environmental Concern The following APECs were identified:

APEC 1 – Fill was observed across the Phase One Property (metals and PAHs); and

APEC 2 –- The presence of a heating oil AST in the basement of the residential dwelling located on the southeastern portion of the Site (PHCs).

Subsurface Structures and Utilities The presence of subsurface utilities and structures at the Site are not expected to act as preferential pathways promoting the migration of COCs as the water table is not inferred to intercept buried utilities and subsurface structures at the Phase Two Property and no COCs are present in groundwater exceeding the Site condition standards.

The Site and surrounding area are serviced with municipal water, storm sewers, sanitary services, natural gas, hydro and telecommunication however all utilities have been decommissioned at the Site because it is vacant. The depth of these services is inferred to range between frost depth (1.2 mbgs) and the water table (1.6 mbgs).

Building structures located on the Site are shown on Figure 2. The Site building has a basement. The depth of the basement extends to a depth of 2.4 mbgs.

Water levels at the Site range from 1.64 to 2.06 mbgs. The water table is not inferred to intercept buried utilities and subsurface structures at the Phase Two Property.

PHYSICAL SETTING Stratigraphy Representative geologic cross-sections of the Site are presented in Figures 4 and 5. Boreholes were advanced to a maximum depth of 6.25 mbgs. In general, the subsurface soil conditions consisted of a layer of topsoil ranging from 25 to 61 cm in thickness which was present at surface at all borehole locations with the exception of BH15-3. Beneath the topsoil consisted of a layer of fill material. Fill materials generally consisted of sandy silt to sand extending to a maximum depth of 1.83 mbgs. The fill was underlain by native clayey silt to silty clay. Sandy silt was encountered below the clayey silt to silty clay unit, extending to the maximum depth of drilling. The native overburden thickness was observed to be at least 6.25 m at the Site, but is anticipated to extend beyond the maximum depth of drilling. Bedrock was not encountered during drilling.

Hydrogeological Characteristics The regional groundwater is anticipated to flow in a south to south east direction towards Lake Ontario, located approximately 3 km to the southeast of the Site. The direction of local groundwater flow in the vicinity of the Site is expected to be southeast towards Petticoat Creek. Static groundwater levels were measured in the monitoring wells located across the Site on August 31, 2015. Figure 3 shows August 31, 2015 groundwater elevations and the interpreted groundwater flow direction. Groundwater elevations at the Site ranged from 96.68 mald (BH15-2) to 97.53 mald (BH15-3) and were encountered at depths of 1.64 to 2.06 mbgs. Local groundwater is anticipated to flow in a south east direction towards Petticoat Creek. Regional groundwater is anticipated to flow in a south to south east direction towards Lake Ontario.



Static groundwater levels were measured in the monitoring wells located across the Site on August 31, 2015. Figure 3 shows August 31, 2015 groundwater elevations and the interpreted groundwater flow direction. Groundwater elevations at the Site ranged from 96.68 mald (BH15-2) to 97.53 mald (BH15-3) and were encountered at depths of 1.64 to 2.06 mbgs. Local groundwater is anticipated to flow in a south east direction towards Petticoat Creek. Regional groundwater is anticipated to flow in a south to south east direction towards Lake Ontario. The average horizontal hydraulic gradient was estimated for shallow groundwater conditions based on water levels collected on August 31, 2015, and the inferred groundwater contours as plotted on Figure 3. The average horizontal hydraulic gradient for shallow groundwater conditions was calculated to be 0.027 m/m.

Vertical hydraulic gradients were not calculated as no COCs were identified in groundwater exceeding the site condition standards and as such, no nested monitoring well pairs were installed at the Site.

The following additional observations are provided:

Bedrock was not encountered during the Phase Two investigation. The reported depth to bedrock in the Phase One ESA is 72.54 mbgs;

The depth to the water table ranges from 1.64 to 2.06 mbgs which is within the native silty clay and clayey silt;

The QP is not aware of any respect in which section 41 or 43.1 of the regulation applies to the property; and,

Soil has not been brought from another property and placed on, in or under the Site as part of this Phase Two ESA. As noted, fill was historically present at the Site and is identified as an APEC.

DELINEATION OF CONTAMINANT IMPACTS APECs Where Contaminants are Present at a Concentration Above the Applicable Site Condition Standard No contaminants with concentrations above the applicable site condition standards were identified on-Site.

Contaminant Distribution No contaminants were present in soil or groundwater at a concentration greater than the applicable site condition standard. No sediment is present at the Phase Two Property.

Potential Reason for Discharge into the Environment at the Site No contaminants were present in soil or groundwater at a concentration greater than the applicable site condition standard.

Contaminant Migration None of the contaminants of potential concern were detected in soil or groundwater samples at concentrations exceeding the applicable site condition standards and therefore contaminant migration is not relevant to the Site.



Meteorological and Climatic Considerations Seasonal fluctuation in water levels on the Site should be expected. Given the limited number of monitoring events seasonal trends could not be identified, however shallow groundwater water levels are typically highest following the spring recharge and decline throughout the summer and fall months into the winter.

Soil Vapour Intrusion Pathways None of the contaminants of potential concern were detected in the soil of groundwater samples at concentrations exceeding the applicable site condition standards and therefore soil vapour intrusion pathways are not relevant to the Site.

CROSS-SECTIONS Lateral and Vertical Distribution of Contaminants Representative cross-sections of the Site are presented in Figures 4 and 5.

POTENTIAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS AND RECEPTORS None of the contaminants of potential concern were detected in the soil or groundwater samples at concentrations exceeding the applicable site condition standards and therefore no potential exposure pathways have been identified at the Site.

7.0 CONCLUSIONS The Phase Two ESA investigated the APECs identified in the 2015 Phase One ESA. The reported concentrations of the contaminants of potential concern in all soil and groundwater samples were below the applicable site condition standards as of the certification date (September 8, 2015). The findings of this Phase Two ESA are sufficient to support a Record of Site Condition submission to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.

The data presented in this report follows the O. Reg. 153/04 Phase Two ESA report format.

8.0 REFERENCES Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 208 Gerrard Street East, Toronto, Ontario

Quaternary Geology of Ontario, Southern Sheet. Map 2556. Ontario Ministry of Development and Mines dated 1991 (Map No. 2556, Quaternary Geology of Ontario, Southern Sheet, 1991).

Bedrock Geology of Ontario, Southern Sheet. Map 2544. Ontario Ministry of Development and Mines dated 1991 Map No. 2544, Bedrock Geology of Ontario, Southern Sheet, 1991).

9.0 LIMITATIONS This report was prepared for the exclusive use of Altona Home Construction Inc. c/o Geranium Corporation. The report, which specifically includes all tables, figures and appendices, is based on data and information, collected during conducting the Phase Two ESA, and is based solely on the conditions of the property at the time of conducting investigations, supplemented by historical information and data obtained by Golder Associates Ltd. as described in this report.



The assessment of environmental conditions at this Site has been made using the results of field screening techniques and chemical analysis of soil and groundwater samples at a limited number of locations. The Site conditions between sampling locations have been inferred based on conditions observed at the sampling locations. Conditions may vary from these sample locations. Additional study, including further investigation, can reduce the inherent uncertainties associated with this type of study. However, it is never possible, even with exhaustive sampling and testing, to dismiss the possibility that part of a Site may be contaminated and remain undetected.

The services performed as described in this report were conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill normally exercised by other members of the engineering and science professions currently practicing under similar conditions, subject to the time limits and financial and physical constraints applicable to the services.

Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on, or decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibilities of such third parties. Golder Associates Ltd. accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party (other than as noted above) as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report.

The content of this report is based on information collected during the drilling, soil and groundwater sampling activities, our present understanding of the Site conditions, and our professional judgement in light of such information at the time of this report. This report provides a professional opinion and therefore no warranty is expressed, implied, or made as to the conclusions, advice and recommendations offered in this report. This report does not provide a legal opinion regarding compliance with applicable laws. With respect to regulatory compliance issues, it should be noted that regulatory statutes and the interpretation of regulatory statutes are subject to change.

The findings and conclusions of this report are valid only as of the date of this report. If new information is discovered in future work, including excavations, borings or other studies, Golder Associates Ltd. should be requested to re-evaluate the conclusions of this report, and to provide amendments as required.

The monitoring wells installed as part of this project have been constructed using licensed drilling/well contractors employing licensed well technicians. It is owner’s responsibility to have a licensed well technician properly abandon all monitoring wells, if required.

10.0 SIGNATURES The undersigned Qualified Person confirms that he/she was responsible for conducting and/or supervising this Phase Two ESA and the associated findings and conclusions.

We trust that you will find the contents of this report satisfactory for your current needs. Should you require clarification of the information provided, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.



TABLES

December 9, 2015 Report No. 1536748

TABLE 1MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

1484-1498 Altona Road, Pickering, Ontario

1536748September 2015 Golder Associates Ltd.

Well ID Date Installed

Installed by

Well Diameter(mm)

Screen Length

(m)

Screen Interval (mbgs)

Borehole Depth (mbgs)

Lithology at Screen

BH15-1 19-Aug-15 GolderBH15-2 19-Aug-15 Golder 51 3.0 3.04-6.09 6.10 Sandy SiltBH15-3 19-Aug-15 Golder 51 2.4 3.65-6.09 5.77 Silty Clay to Clayey SiltBH15-4 19-Aug-15 Golder 51 3.0 3.04-6.09 6.25 Silt Clay to Clayey Silt

Notes:

mm = millimetre.

m = metre.

mbgs = metres below ground surface.

Table to be read in conjunction with accompanying report.

Prepared by: KTChecked by: EC

No well installed at this location

TABLE 2GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS



Depth to water (mbtop)

Depth to water (mbgs)

Groundwater Elevation

(mald)

BH15-1 98.02 NA NA NA NABH15-2 98.74 99.64 2.96 2.06 96.68BH15-3 99.18 100.00 2.47 1.64 97.53BH15-4 98.94 99.74 2.46 1.67 97.28

Notes:

NA = not applicablembtop = metres below top of pipe.

mbgs = metres below ground surface.

mald = metres

Table to be read in conjunction with accompanying report.

Temporary benchmark elevation of 100.00 was used for the top nut of the fire hydrant locates on the east side of Altona Road at 1477 Alton Road (649921.4 m E, 4853212 m N)

Prepared by: KT

Checked by: EC

August 31, 2015 Monitoring Well

ID

Ground Surface Elevation

(mald)

Top of Pipe Elevation

(mald)

TABLE 3SUMMARY OF SOIL SAMPLES SUBMITTED FOR LABORATORY ANALYSES



Location Sample ID Sampling Date Sample Depth (mbgs)

Headspace Concentration

(ppm)Soil Type Parameters Analyzed

BH15-2 BH15-2 SA1 19-Aug-15 0.28 - 0.48 0 Fill- Sandy Silt Metals, PAHs, pH

BH15-2 BH15-2 SA3 19-Aug-15 1.22 - 1.73 0 Fill- Sand PHC F1-F4

BH15-3 BH15-3 SA1 19-Aug-15 0.0 - 1.58 0 Fill- Sandy Silt Metals

BH15-3 Dup 1 19-Aug-15 0.0 - 1.58 0 Fill- Sandy Silt Metals

BH15-3 BH15-3 SA4 19-Aug-15 1.83 - 2.44 0 Fill- Clayey Silt Metals, PAHs

BH15-3 BH15-3 SA5 19-Aug-15 2.43 - 3.04 0 Clayey Silt pH

BH15-4 BH15-4 SA2 19-Aug-15 0.61 - 1.09 0 Fill- Sandy Silt Metals, PAHs

TP-04 TP-04 SA4 8-Sep-15 2.44 - 2.51 0 Sandy Clayey Silt PHC F1-F4

Notes:All depths are expressed as metres below ground surface (mbgs).

PAHs = Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons.PHC F1-F4 = Petroleum hydrocarbons fractions F1 to F4.ppm = parts per millionTable to be read in conjunction with accompanying report. Prepared by: KTChecked by: EC

TABLE 4SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER SAMPLES SUBMITTED FOR LABORATORY ANALYSIS



Well ID Sample ID Sampling Date Parameters Analyzed

BH15-2 BH15-2 1-Sep-15 PHCs F1-F4

BH15-2 Dup 3 1-Sep-15 PHCs F1-F4

Notes:

PHC F1-F4 = Petroleum hydrocarbons fractions F1 to F4.

Table to be read in conjunction with accompanying report. Prepared by: KTChecked by: EC

TABLE 5ASOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS: PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS FRACTIONS 1 TO 4


1536748September 2015 Golder Associates Ltd. Page 1 of 4

BH15-2 TP-04 BH15-2 SA#3 TP-04 SA4

1.22 - 1.73 2.44 - 2.51Laboratory Certificate of Analysis 15T011393 15T016925

6902396 694999219-Aug-15 8-Sep-1528-Aug-15 11-Sep-15

Parameter Unit MOE Table 2 F1 (C6 to C10) µg/g NA <5 <5 <5F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX µg/g 55 <5 <5 <5F2 (C10 to C16) µg/g 98 <10 <10 <10F3 (C16 to C34) µg/g 300 <50 <50 <50F4 (C34 to C50) µg/g 2800 <50 <50 <50

Notes:< = Not detected above method detection limitmbgs = metre below ground surface

NV = No value

NA = not applicableµg/g = microgram/gram (equivalent to parts per million (PPM))

Table to be read in conjunction with accompanying report prepared by: KTchecked by: EC

MOE Table 2: Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Potable Ground Water Condition, Residential/Parkland/Institutional, coarse textured soil, "Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 Environmental Protection Act" Ministry of the Environment (MOE) April 15, 2011

Sample IDSample Depth (mbgs)

Sampling Date

Sample Location

Maximum Concentration

Laboratory ID

Analysis Date

TABLE 5BSOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS: METALS



BH15-2 BH15-3 BH15-3 BH15-3 BH15-4 B15-2 SA#1 BH15-3 SA1 Dup 1 BH15-3 SA#4 BH15-4 SA#20.28 - 0.48 0.0 - 1.58 0.0 - 1.58 1.83 - 2.44 0.61 - 1.09

Laboratory Certificate of Analysis Number 15T011393 15T019228 15T019228 15T011393 15T0113936902388 6969530 6969531 6902391 6902394

19-Aug-15 19-Aug-15 19-Aug-15 19-Aug-15 19-Aug-1528-Aug-15 16-Sep-15 16-Sep-15 28-Aug-15 28-Aug-15

Parameter Unit MOE Table 2 Antimony µg/g 7.5 <0.8 - - <0.8 <0.8 <0.8Arsenic µg/g 18 2 - - 2 2 2Boron µg/g 120 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5Barium µg/g 390 37 46 46 46 31 46

Beryllium µg/g 4 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Cadmium µg/g 1.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Chromium µg/g 160 12 11 11 10 9 12

Cobalt µg/g 22 4.1 4.1 4.2 4 3.2 4.2Copper µg/g 140 8 10 12 8 7 12Lead µg/g 120 15 9 11 4 4 15

Molybdenum µg/g 6.9 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Nickel µg/g 100 7 9 10 6 5 10

Selenium µg/g 2.4 <0.4 - - <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Silver µg/g 20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Thallium µg/g 1 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Uranium µg/g 23 <0.5 <0.5 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 0.6

Vanadium ug/g 86 18 17 18 16 16 18Zinc µg/g 340 36 36 38 22 15 38

Notes:< = Not detected above method detection limitmbgs = metre below ground surfaceNV = No value - = Not availableµg/g = microgram/gram (equivalent to parts per million (PPM))


MOE Table 2: Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Potable Ground Water Condition, Residential/Parkland/Institutional, coarse textured soil, "Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 Environmental Protection Act" Ministry of the Environment (MOE) April 15, 2011.

Sample Location



Sampling DateLaboratory ID

Analysis Date

TABLE 5CSOIL ANALYTICAL RESTULS: POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS



BH15-2 BH15-3 BH15-4B15-2 SA#1 BH15-3 SA#4 BH15-4 SA#20.28 - 0.48 1.83 - 2.44 0.61 - 1.09

Laboratory Certificate of Analysis Number 15T011393 15T011393 15T0113936902388 6902391 6902394

19-Aug-15 19-Aug-15 19-Aug-1528-Aug-15 28-Aug-15 28-Aug-15

Parameter Unit MOE Table 2 Naphthalene µg/g 0.6 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Acenaphthylene µg/g 0.15 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthene µg/g 7.9 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Fluorene µg/g 62 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Phenanthrene µg/g 6.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Anthracene µg/g 0.67 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Fluoranthene µg/g 0.69 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Pyrene µg/g 78 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Benz(a)anthracene µg/g 0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Chrysene µg/g 7 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(b)fluoranthene µg/g 0.78 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(k)fluoranthene µg/g 0.78 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Benzo(a)pyrene µg/g 0.3 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene µg/g 0.38 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dibenz(a,h)anthracene µg/g 0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(g,h,i)perylene µg/g 6.6 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene µg/g 0.99 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Notes: < = Not detected above method detection limitmbgs = metre below ground surfaceNV = No value - = Not availableµg/g = microgram/gram (equivalent to parts per million (PPM))



Sample Location



Laboratory IDSampling DateAnalysis Date

TABLE 5DSOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS: PH



BH15-2 BH15-3B15-2 SA#1 BH15-3 SA#50.28 - 0.48 2.43 - 3.04

Laboratory Certificate of Analysis Number 15T011393 15T0113936902388 6902393

19-Aug-15 19-Aug-1528-Aug-15 28-Aug-15

ParameterMOE

Table 2 pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction NV 7.32 7.94 7.94

Notes:

mbgs = metre below ground surface

NV = No value

Table to be read in conjunction with accompanying report

prepared by: KT

checked by: EC

Sample Location



Laboratory IDSampling DateAnalysis Date

TABLE 6AGROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS: PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS FRACTIONS 1 TO 4



BH15-2 BH15-2BH15-2 DUP-3

Laboratory Certificate of Analysis 15T014236 15T0142366925092 69250971-Sep-15 1-Sep-15

Analysis Date 4-Sep-15 4-Sep-15Parameter Unit MOE Table 2F1 (C6 to C10) µg/L 750 <25 <25 <25F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX µg/L - <25 <25 <25F2 (C10 to C16) µg/L 150 <100 <100 <100F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene µg/L - <100 - <100F3 (C16 to C34) µg/L 500 <100 <100 <100F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs µg/L - <100 - <100F4 (C34 to C50) µg/L 500 <100 <100 <100

Notes:< = Not detected above method detection limitmbgs = metre below ground surfaceNV = No value - = Not availableµg/L = microgram per litre


Location


Sampling Date

Sample ID

Laboratory ID



FIGURES


!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!

!

!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

PETT ICOAT CREEK

LITTLE ROUGE CREEK

PETTICOAT

CREEK

ROUGE RIVER(RIVIÈREROUGE)

LAKEONTARIO

(LAC ONTARIO)

PETTICOATCREEK

ALTON

A RO

AD

FAIRPO

RTR

OAD

KINGSTON ROAD

STROUDS LANE

SHEPPARD AVENUE EAST

SHEPPARD AVENUE

TWYN RIVERS DRIVE

RO

SEBANK

RO

AD

FINCH AVENUE

ISLAND ROAD

WH

ITESRO

AD

HIGHWAY 401

BAYL

YST

REET

TOW

NLIN

E PICKER

ING

CITY OFPICKERING

CITY OFTORONTO

REGIONALMUNICIPALITYOF DURHAM

647517

647517

648517

648517

649517

649517

650517

650517

651517

651517 4850

736

4851

736

4851

736

4852

736

4852

736

4853

736

4853

736

4854

736

4854

736

LEGEND

RAILWAYROAD

! UTILITY LINEWATERCOURSEBUILDINGMUNICIPAL BOUNDARYAPPROXIMATE PHASE TWOPROPERTY

WATERBODYWETLANDWOODED AREA

Pat

h: S

:\Clie

nts\

Ger

aniu

m\P

icke

ring_

Alto

na\9

9_P

RO

J\15

3674

8_A

ltona

_Hom

e_C

onst

ruct

ion\

40_P

RO

D\0

001_

Pha

se_I

I_E

SA

\153

6748

-000

1-H

S-0

001.

mxd

IF T

HIS

ME

AS

UR

EM

EN

T D

OE

S N

OT

MAT

CH

WH

AT IS

SH

OW

N, T

HE

SH

EE

T S

IZE

HA

S B

EE

N M

OD

IFIE

D F

RO

M:

25m

m0

REFERENCE(S)BASE DATA - MNR LIO, OBTAINED 2015PRODUCED BY GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD UNDER LICENCE FROM ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NATURALRESOURCES, © QUEENS PRINTER 2015PROJECTION: TRANSVERSE MERCATOR DATUM: NAD 83 COORDINATE SYSTEM: UTM ZONE 17N

0 500 1,000

1:25,000 METRES

1PROJECT NO. CONTROL FIGURE

CLIENT

ALTONA HOME CONSTRUCTION INC.C/O GERANIUM CORPORATIONPROJECTPHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT1484 - 1498 ALTONA ROAD, PICKERING, ONTARIOTITLE

KEY PLAN

CONSULTANT

REV.

2015-11-26

JT

JT

EC

EH

YYYY-MM-DD

DESIGNED

PREPARED

REVIEWED

APPROVED

1536748 (4000)

649735

649735

649935

649935

4853

138

S:\C

lient

s\G

eran

ium

\Pic

kerin

g_A

ltona

\99_

PR

OJ\

1536

748_

Alto

na_H

ome_

Con

stru

ctio

n\40

_PR

OD

\000

1_P

hase

_II_

ES

A\1

5367

48-0

001-

HS

-000

2.m

xd

IF T

HIS

ME

AS

UR

EME

NT

DO

ES N

OT

MAT

CH

WH

AT IS

SH

OW

N, T

HE

SH

EE

T SI

ZE H

AS B

EEN

MO

DIF

IED

FR

OM

:25

mm

0

0 25 50

1:750 METRES

CLIENT

ALTONA HOME CONSTRUCTION INC.C/O GERANIUM CORPORATION

NOTE(S)

REFERENCE(S)

1. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE

BASE DATA - MNR LIO, OBTAINED 2015PRODUCED BY GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD UNDER LICENCE FROM ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NATURALRESOURCES, © QUEENS PRINTER 2015BASE IMAGERY - MICROSOFT BING ©2015 MICROSOFT CORPORATION AND ITS DATA SUPPLIERS.PROJECTION: TRANSVERSE MERCATOR DATUM: NAD 83 COORDINATE SYSTEM: UTM ZONE 17N

PROJECT

PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT1484 - 1498 ALTONA ROAD, PICKERING, ONTARIOTITLE

PROPERTY PLAN

1536748 (4000) 2

2015-11-26

JT

JT

EC

EH

CONSULTANT

PROJECT NO. CONTROL REV. FIGURE

YYYY-MM-DD

DESIGNED

PREPARED

REVIEWED

APPROVED

LEGEND

@A BOREHOLE LOCATION

ED TEST PIT LOCATION

Ë

Ë

GEOLOGICAL CROSS SECTION LINEAPPROXIMATE PHASE TWO PROPERTY

AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (APECS)APEC 1APEC 2

649735

649735

649935

649935

4853

138

S:\C

lient

s\G

eran

ium

\Pic

kerin

g_A

ltona

\99_

PR

OJ\

1536

748_

Alto

na_H

ome_

Con

stru

ctio

n\40

_PR

OD

\000

1_P

hase

_II_

ES

A\1

5367

48-0

001-

HS

-000

3.m

xd

IF T

HIS

ME

AS

UR

EME

NT

DO

ES N

OT

MAT

CH

WH

AT IS

SH

OW

N, T

HE

SH

EE

T SI

ZE H

AS B

EEN

MO

DIF

IED

FR

OM

:25

mm

0

0 25 50

1:750 METRES

CLIENT


NOTE(S)

REFERENCE(S)

1. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE2. M BGS = METRES BELOW GROUND SURFACE

BASE DATA - MNR LIO, OBTAINED 2015PRODUCED BY GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD UNDER LICENCE FROM ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NATURALRESOURCES, © QUEENS PRINTER 2015BASE IMAGERY - MICROSOFT BING ©2015 MICROSOFT CORPORATION AND ITS DATA SUPPLIERS.PROJECTION: TRANSVERSE MERCATOR DATUM: NAD 83 COORDINATE SYSTEM: UTM ZONE 17N

PROJECT

PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT1484 - 1498 ALTONA ROAD, PICKERING, ONTARIOTITLE

GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS (AUGUST 31, 2015)

1536748 (4000) 3

2015-11-26

JT

JT

EC

EH

CONSULTANT

PROJECT NO. CONTROL REV. FIGURE

YYYY-MM-DD

DESIGNED

PREPARED

REVIEWED

APPROVED

LEGEND

@A BOREHOLE LOCATION

ED TEST PIT LOCATION

GROUNDWATER CONTOURS (M)APPROXIMATE PHASE TWO PROPERTY

98.0

(97.64) GROUNDWATER ELEVEATION (M BGS), MEASURED AUGUST 31, 2015

CONSULTANT

DESIGN

PREPARED

REVIEW

APPROVED

YYYY-MM-DD TITLE

PROJECT No. Rev.

PROJECTCLIENT

Path

: \\g

olde

r.gds

\gal

\mis

siss

auga

\sim

\Clie

nts\

Ger

aniu

m\P

icke

ring_

Alto

na\9

9_PR

OJ\

1536

748_

Alto

na_H

ome_

Con

stru

ctio

n\40

_PR

OD

\000

1_Ph

ase_

II_ES

A\ |

File

Nam

e: 1

5367

48-0

001-

HS-

0004

.dw

g

025

mm

IF T

HIS

MEA

SUR

EMEN

T D

OES

NO

T M

ATC

H W

HAT

IS S

HO

WN

, TH

E SH

EET

SIZE

HAS

BEE

N M

OD

IFIE

D F

RO

M: A

NSI

B

1536748 (4000)FIGURE

4A

2015-09-15

GY

EC

EH

PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT1484 - 1498 ALTONA ROAD, PICKERING, ONTARIO


CROSS SECTION A-A'

0

1:750

12.5 25

METRES

SOIL STRATIGRAPHY

LEGEND

BH15-2O/S 0.4 m

SOIL STRATIGRAPHY

GROUNDWATER ELEVATION(APRIL 1, 2015)

BOREHOLE ID

BOREHOLE LOCATION

MONITORING WELL SCREEN

BENTONITE SEAL

INFERRED DIVISION BETWEEN SOIL STRATIGRAPHY UNITS

FILL / OVERBURDEN

SILTY CLAY

SANDY SILT TILL

SILTY CLAY TILL

A-A'2

CROSS SECTIONVERT SCALE: 1:75HORZ SCALE: 1:750

CONSULTANT

DESIGN

PREPARED

REVIEW

APPROVED

YYYY-MM-DD TITLE

PROJECT No. Rev.

PROJECTCLIENT

Path

: \\g

olde

r.gds

\gal

\mis

siss

auga

\sim

\Clie

nts\

Ger

aniu

m\P

icke

ring_

Alto

na\9

9_PR

OJ\

1536

748_

Alto

na_H

ome_

Con

stru

ctio

n\40

_PR

OD

\000

1_Ph

ase_

II_ES

A\ |

File

Nam

e: 1

5367

48-0

001-

HS-

0005

.dw

g

025

mm

IF T

HIS

MEA

SUR

EMEN

T D

OES

NO

T M

ATC

H W

HAT

IS S

HO

WN

, TH

E SH

EET

SIZE

HAS

BEE

N M

OD

IFIE

D F

RO

M: A

NSI

B

1536748 (4000)FIGURE

5A

2015-09-15

GY

EC

EH

PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT1484 - 1498 ALTONA ROAD, PICKERING, ONTARIO


CROSS SECTION B-B'

0

1:750

12.5 25

METRES

SOIL STRATIGRAPHY

LEGEND

BH15-2O/S 0.4 m

SOIL STRATIGRAPHY

GROUNDWATER ELEVATION(APRIL 1, 2015)

BOREHOLE ID

BOREHOLE LOCATION

MONITORING WELL SCREEN

BENTONITE SEAL

INFERRED DIVISION BETWEEN SOIL STRATIGRAPHY UNITS

FILL / OVERBURDEN

SILTY SAND AND GRAVEL

SANDY SILT TILL

CLAYEY SILT TILL

SILTY CLAY TILL

B-B'2

CROSS SECTIONVERT SCALE: 1:75HORZ SCALE: 1:750


APPENDIX A (I) Sampling and Analysis Plan


SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN

OBJECTIVE - CONFIDENTIAL Golder understands that the Client is considering purchasing the property and plans to redevelop the property with a high density residential land use. The intent of the current work is to investigate the Areas of Potential Environmental Concern (“APECs”) identified in the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment completed by Golder in August 2015 (the “2015 Phase I ESA”) including an assessment of soil and groundwater conditions at the Site. This investigation is being completed concurrently with a geotechnical investigation.

SITE BACKGROUND The Site consists of a parcel of land which is largely vacant with the exception on one vacant residential dwelling located at 1484 Alton Road. The dwelling has a heating oil AST in the southeast corner of the basement which appeared to have been leaking.

Based on the results of the 2015 Phase I ESA, the followed APEC was identified at the Site:

1) Presence of fill of unknown quality on-Site; and

2) Presence of a heating oil AST in the basement of the on-Site dwelling.

SITE ACCESS REQUIREMENTS

Access Concern Information

Site Contact Steve Keenan will arrange for access Access No specific access requirements Hours of Work No restrictions Site Check-in Procedure Check in with Emily Casey upon arrival (905-396-3581) Photography No restrictions On-Site Orientation or Training None required

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Follow standard operating procedures. All work is to be completed assuming a Record of Site Condition will

be required.

Complete a Daily Log for every day of field work. Use standard field forms.

TO Adam Komar, Evelyn Marsch DATE August 14, 2015

CC Steve Keenan

FROM Emily Casey (Project Coordinator cell 905-396-3581) Eric Hood (Qualified Person ) Kevan Browne (cell 905-409-1650)

PROJECT No. 1436748

SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN, ALTONA SITE, PICKERING, ONTARIO

Date: August 14, 2015 Project No. 1536746 To: Adam Komer 1/5


Specifically ask the Site contact(s) for any drawings that may show underground utilities.

Initial calibration of field equipment should be performed at the start of each field day, with a daily check of calibration using a standard of known concentration.

Clean disposable Nitrile™ gloves will be used at each sampling location to prevent cross-contamination.

All non-dedicated sampling equipment (e.g., water level meters, split spoons) will be decontaminated between sampling locations. Sampling equipment in contact with soil, groundwater, or sediment will be: cleaned with a brush; washed with a laboratory-grade detergent solution (e.g., phosphate-free LiquiNox or AlcoNox) and thoroughly rinsed with analyte-free water.

BOREHOLE DRILLING AND WELL INSTALLATION To be completed during the week of August 17-21 as per the Geotechnical Schedule

** Confirm that every drilling location has been cleared by the private locator. **

A detailed description of the drilling scope and well construction details is provided in the driller work order as arranged by the geotechnical group.

Screen soil samples at 2 foot intervals using an RKI Eagle combustible gas detector. Bag some soil at each interval.

At each drilling location, one “worst-case” soil sample (to be determined based on field screening) will be collected as described in Table 1. If significant field evidence of impacts are observed, a second, deeper sample should be collected (in case we need to establish a clean line below impacts). Emily will go through logs and samples at the office on Tuesday/Wednesday and select samples for laboratory submission.

Collect additional soil samples if warranted by field observations.

Submit representative soil samples for grain size analysis.

Table 1 Borehole and Soil Sampling Plan

Location Borehole ID

Well Installed

(Y/N) Depth

(m bgs) Soil Samples Duplicate Samples

North of the dwelling BH15-3 Y

At least to below water

table

Metals (short list), PAHs, pH (Need 2 pH samples, one shallow sample and

one deep sample)

None

North of the dwelling BH15-4 y

At least to below water

table Metals (short list), PAHs None



Location Borehole ID

Well Installed

(Y/N) Depth

(m bgs) Soil Samples Duplicate Samples

South of the dwelling (downgradient of the heating oil AST)

BH15-2 Y

Straddling the water

table PHCs, Metals (short list), PAHs

PHCs, Metals (short list), PAHs

For well installation, please use 2 inch inner diameter (ID) Schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) casing and 2 inch ID Schedule 40 PVC well screens (1.5 metres in length, #10 slot size); sand pack surrounding each screen will be #00N; each monitoring well will be completed at ground surface with a flush-mount protective casing set in concrete and sealed with a PVC j-plug.

Mark the reference point at the top of well pipe with a small notch. Install waterra tubing and footvalve in each new monitoring well.

Table 2 Monitoring Well Construction

Borehole ID Depth of screen

base (m bgs)

Screen length (ft)

Well diameter (inch) Protective Casing Type

BH15-3 Set screen to straddle water table

10 2 Stick-up


10 2 Stick-up


10 2 Stick-up

GROUNDWATER MONITORING - August 31, 2015 Before measuring the water levels, open the J-plugs to allow air in the casing to vent and the water level to

stabilize.

Collect a round of water level measurements using the water level meter. Use the “Static Water Level Field Form”.

The multi-parameter meter should be initially calibrated the equipment supplier and thereafter at the start of the each day. Check calibration to known pH and conductivity concentration at mid-day. If equipment is out of calibration (i.e., reading is off by more than 10%), call Emily.

Develop monitoring wells;

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND SURVEYING – September 1, 2015



Collect groundwater samples from monitoring wells following SOP9 (Conventional Groundwater Sample Collection) for the parameters in Table 3.

The multi-parameter meter should be initially calibrated the equipment supplier and thereafter at the start of the each day. Check calibration to known pH and conductivity concentration at mid-day. If equipment is out of calibration (i.e., reading is off by more than 10%), call Emily.

Collect quality assurance samples as indicated in Table 3. The duplicate groundwater samples should be labelled in a manner in which the laboratory cannot readily identify the sample as a duplicate.

Please call Emily if you see or suspect that there is product in any monitoring well.

Use the “Groundwater Sample Collection” form to collect all data during groundwater sampling.

Table 3 Groundwater Sampling Plan

Borehole ID Field Parameter Measurements

Groundwater Analyses to be Requested

QA/QC samples

BH15-2 pH, temp, conductivity

PHCs PHCs

CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Chain-of-Custody Item Information Analytical Laboratory AGAT Laboratories Generic Site Condition Standards Table 2 residential/intuitional/parkland Use Record of Site Condition analytical procedures? Yes

Turn-around Time To be reported by end of day Friday September 4, 2015

Golder Reporting Contact [email protected] Project-Specific Quote Number (if applicable) None Golder Billing Contact [email protected] Is an EQuiS EDD Required? No

MANAGEMENT OF INVESTIGATION DERIVED WASTE In the event that indicators of contamination are identified, keep waste soil and water segregated into

separate drums

Label drums for waste management purposes, project number, date and drum contents (soil, purge water)

Discuss best location to store drums with site contact

Record inventory of waste containers on Daily Log



SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS Check in with Emily at start and end of each day and following drilling of each borehole (prior to well

installation)

Give environmental field file to Emily in Whitby

\\golder.gds\gal\Whitby\Active\2015\3 Proj\1536748 Geranium_Altona_Pickering\Reports\Phase Two ESA\Report\Draft\Appendices\Appendix (i)- SAP\1536748 Sampling and Analysis

Plan.docx



APPENDIX A (II) Grain Size



APPENDIX A (III) Borehole and Test Pit Logs


1. Water levelmeasured in openborehole uponconclusion of drilling ata depth of 2.4 m belowground surface, Aug.19/15

TR

AC

K M

OU

NT

ED

CM

E 5

5

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

4

9

31

17

16

24

50/.13

110

mm

O/D

Sol

id S

tem

Aug

ers

TOPSOIL/FILL - SILTY SAND, rootlets

FILL - (ML) sandy SILT, trace gravel;brown , oxidation staining, pockets ofsilty clay, organic inclusions;non-cohesive, wet, loose

(SM) SILTY SAND, trace gravel, traceclay; brown to grey at 2.2 m, oxidationstaining; non-cohesive, moist to wet,dense to compact

(ML) sandy SILT, trace gravel; grey(TILL); non-cohesive, moist to wet,compact to very dense

END OF BOREHOLE

0.25

1.45

2.97

5.74

97.77

96.57

95.05

92.28

AD

DIT

ION

AL

LAB

. TE

ST

ING

SOIL PROFILE

RECORD OF BOREHOLE: 15-1

SAMPLES

DEPTH(m)

ST

RA

TA

PLO

T

BLO

WS

/0.3

m 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3

10 20 30 40

Wl

PIEZOMETEROR

STANDPIPEINSTALLATION

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY, k, cm/s

W

WATER CONTENT PERCENT

BO

RIN

G M

ET

HO

D

TY

PE

BORING DATE: August 19, 2015

NU

MB

ER

ELEV.

Wp

SHEET 1 OF 1

SPT/DCPT HAMMER: MASS, 64kg; DROP, 762mm HAMMER TYPE: AUTOMATIC

DESCRIPTION

GROUND SURFACE

LOGGED:

CHECKED:

DATUM: Local

PROJECT: 1536748

LOCATION: N 4853216.27; E 649833.16

AK

0.0098.02

DEPTH SCALE

1 : 50

DE

PT

H S

CA

LEM

ET

RE

S

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

EW

GT

A-B

HS

001

S:\C

LIE

NT

S\G

ER

AN

IUM

\PIC

KE

RIN

G_A

LTO

NA

\02_

DA

TA

\GIN

T\1

5367

48_E

NV

.GP

J G

AL-

MIS

.GD

T 1

1/2

7/15

M

K A

ug. 2

015

nat V.rem V.

20 40 60 80

20 40 60 80

DYNAMIC PENETRATIONRESISTANCE, BLOWS/0.3m

SHEAR STRENGTHCu, kPa

Q -U -

1. Borehole open anddry upon completion ofdrilling, Aug. 19/15

2. Groundwatermeasured in monitoringwell at a depth of 2.06m (96.68 Elev.) belowground surface, Aug.31/15

MetalsPAHs

pH

PHC

MH

TR

AC

K M

OU

NT

ED

CM

E 5

5 S

PLI

T S

PO

ON

SA

MP

LIN

G

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

1

2

3

4

5A

5B

6

7

8

7

7

22

12

38

39

44

43

220

mm

O/D

Hol

low

Ste

m A

uger

s

TOPSOIL/FILL - trace gravel

FILL - (ML) sandy SILT, trace gravel;brown, organic odour, rootlets;non-cohesive, moist, loose

FILL - (SP) SAND, fine to medium, tracegravel, trace silt; brown; non-cohesive,moist to wet, compact

(CL) SILTY CLAY, trace sand; brown, siltpockets, oxidation staining; cohesive,w>PL, stiff to very stiff

(ML) sandy SILT to SILT and SAND,some gravel; brown to grey at 3.1 m,cobbles and boulders (TILL);non-cohesive, moist, dense

Cobbles and boulders inferred fromauger grinding from 3.7 m to 4.3 m

END OF BOREHOLE

0.28

1.22

1.83

2.57

6.10

98.46

97.52

96.91

96.17

92.64

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

50 mm MonitoringWell Installation

Bentonite Seal

Silica Sand Filter

AD

DIT

ION

AL

LAB

. TE

ST

ING

SOIL PROFILE


SAMPLES

DEPTH(m)

ST

RA

TA

PLO

T

BLO

WS

/0.3

m 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3

10 20 30 40

Wl

PIEZOMETEROR



W


BO

RIN

G M

ET

HO

D

TY

PE


NU

MB

ER

ELEV.

Wp

SHEET 1 OF 1


DESCRIPTION

GROUND SURFACE

LOGGED:

CHECKED:

DATUM: Local

PROJECT: 1536748

LOCATION: N 4853207.95; E 649889.00

AK

0.0098.74

DEPTH SCALE

1 : 50

DE

PT

H S

CA

LEM

ET

RE

S

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

EW

GT

A-B

HS

001

S:\C

LIE

NT

S\G

ER

AN

IUM

\PIC

KE

RIN

G_A

LTO

NA

\02_

DA

TA

\GIN

T\1

5367

48_E

NV

.GP

J G

AL-

MIS

.GD

T 1

1/2

7/15

M

K A

ug. 2

015

HEADSPACE ORGANIC VAPOURCONCENTRATIONS [PPM]ND = Not Detected

HEADSPACE COMBUSTIBLE VAPOURCONCENTRATIONS [PPM]ND = Not Detected

100 200 300 400

100 200 300 400

1. Borehole open anddry upon completion ofdrilling, Aug. 19/15


Metals

MetalsPAHs

pH

TR

AC

K M

OU

NT

ED

CM

E 5

5 S

PLI

T S

PO

ON

SA

MP

LIN

G

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7A

7B

8

20

10

17

41

30

27

19

50/.13

220

mm

O/D

Hol

low

Ste

m A

uger

s

FILL - (ML) sandy SILT, trace gravel;brown to black, 10 mm organic layer at41 mm, organic staining, organicinclusions; non-cohesive, moist,compact to loose

Cobble at surface

(ML) sandy CLAYEY SILT, trace gravel;brown, oxidation staining, cobbles andboulders (TILL); cohesive, w<PL, verystiff to hard

Cobbles and boulders inferred fromauger grinding 3.7 m to 4.6 m

(CL) sandy SILTY CLAY, trace gravel;grey (TILL-LIKE); cohesive, w>PL

(ML) sandy SILT, trace gravel; grey(TILL); non-cohesive, moist, compact tovery dense

END OF BOREHOLE

1.22

4.11

4.93

5.77

97.96

95.07

94.25

93.41

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND


Bentonite Seal

Silica Sand Filter

AD

DIT

ION

AL

LAB

. TE

ST

ING

SOIL PROFILE


SAMPLES

DEPTH(m)

ST

RA

TA

PLO

T

BLO

WS

/0.3

m 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3

10 20 30 40

Wl

PIEZOMETEROR



W


BO

RIN

G M

ET

HO

D

TY

PE


NU

MB

ER

ELEV.

Wp

SHEET 1 OF 1


DESCRIPTION

GROUND SURFACE

LOGGED:

CHECKED:

DATUM: Local

PROJECT: 1536748

LOCATION: N 4853269.70; E 649854.33

AK

0.0099.18

DEPTH SCALE

1 : 50

DE

PT

H S

CA

LEM

ET

RE

S

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

EW

GT

A-B

HS

001

S:\C

LIE

NT

S\G

ER

AN

IUM

\PIC

KE

RIN

G_A

LTO

NA

\02_

DA

TA

\GIN

T\1

5367

48_E

NV

.GP

J G

AL-

MIS

.GD

T 1

1/2

7/15

M

K A

ug. 2

015



100 200 300 400

100 200 300 400

1. Borehole caved to adepth of 6.0 m belowground surface atconclusion drilling, Aug.19/15


MetalsPAHs

MHPL

TR

AC

K M

OU

NT

ED

CM

E 5

5 S

PLI

T S

PO

ON

SA

MP

LIN

G

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

5

19

40

80/.28

65

51

11

5

77

220

mm

O/D

Hol

low

Ste

m A

uger

s

TOPSOIL/FILL

FILL - (ML) sandy SILT, some gravel;brown, organic staining to 0.8 m,oxidation staining; non-cohesive, moistto wet, compact

(ML) sandy CLAYEY SILT, trace gravel;brown (TILL); cobbles and boulders,oxidation staining; non-cohesive, moist,dense to very dense

Cobbles and boulders inferred fromauger grinding from 3.5 m to 3.7 m

(CL-ML) sandy SILTY CLAY to CLAYEYSILT and SAND, trace to some gravel;grey (TILL-LIKE); cohesive, w~PL tow<PL, stiff to firm

(ML) sandy SILT, trace gravel; grey(TILL); non-cohesive, moist, very dense

END OF BOREHOLE

0.61

1.22

4.11

5.94

6.25

98.33

97.72

94.83

93.00

92.69

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND


Bentonite Seal

Silica Sand Filter

AD

DIT

ION

AL

LAB

. TE

ST

ING

SOIL PROFILE


SAMPLES

DEPTH(m)

ST

RA

TA

PLO

T

BLO

WS

/0.3

m 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3

10 20 30 40

Wl

PIEZOMETEROR



W


BO

RIN

G M

ET

HO

D

TY

PE


NU

MB

ER

ELEV.

Wp

SHEET 1 OF 1


DESCRIPTION

GROUND SURFACE

LOGGED:

CHECKED:

DATUM: Local

PROJECT: 1536748

LOCATION: N 4853289.97; E 649810.19

AK

0.0098.94

DEPTH SCALE

1 : 50

DE

PT

H S

CA

LEM

ET

RE

S

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

EW

GT

A-B

HS

001

S:\C

LIE

NT

S\G

ER

AN

IUM

\PIC

KE

RIN

G_A

LTO

NA

\02_

DA

TA

\GIN

T\1

5367

48_E

NV

.GP

J G

AL-

MIS

.GD

T 1

1/2

7/15

M

K A

ug. 2

015



100 200 300 400

100 200 300 400

JOB NUMBER JOB NAME DATE

TEST PIT NUMBER TESTPIT SIZE ELEVATION

MACHINE TYPE CONTRACTOR DATUM

TEMPERATURE WEATHER SITE

X Test Pit dry.

Project No.:

TEST PIT No.:

Engineer/Tech:

REMARKS

From To No. Depth No.

CASE 580 Backhoe Fisher Local

27°C Overcast See Plan

Depth

DEPTH (mm)SOIL DESCRIPTION

SAMPLESIN SITU

DENSITY TEST

FIELD TEST PIT LOG15-36748 Altona 9/8/2015

TP - 4 2 ft wide x 10 ft long 99.104

TP - 4

Golder Associates Ltd. DPM

15-36748

Headspace Combustable

Vapour: 125 ppm;

Headspace Organic

Vapour: 0 ppm

clay pipe weeping tile

and clay pipe fragments

at 1400 mm below

ground surface;


Vapour: 155 ppm;

Headspace Organic

Vapour: 0 ppm


Vapour: 185 ppm;

Headspace Organic

Vapour: 0 ppm


Vapour: 115 ppm;

Headspace Organic

Vapour: 0 ppm

100 1470FILL (ML) Sandy SILT, trace gravel; brown, organic inclusions,

rootlets; noncohesive; moist

1

0 100 Brown Silty TOPSOIL FILL

Location Sketch: Water condition in Test Pit:

21070 -

1220

3120 End of Test Pit

FILL (SP) SAND, medium, some gravel, trace silt; brown,

noncohesive, moist

2360 3120(ML) Sandy SILT, some angular to sub-rounded gravel, light

brown becoming grey at 2740 mm, containing cobbles and

boulders (TILL); noncohesive; moist

1470 2360

5

3

3050 -

3120


Vapour: 85 ppm;

Headspace Organic

Vapour: 0 ppm

42440 -

2510

1750 -

1830

100 -

610


APPENDIX A (IV) Laboratory Certificates of Analysis


CLIENT NAME: GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD.100 SCOTIA COURTWHITBY, ON L1N8Y6 (905) 723-2727

5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO

CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122

http://www.agatlabs.com

Neli Popnikolova, Senior ChemistTRACE ORGANICS REVIEWED BY:

Amanjot Bhela, Inorganic CoordinatorWATER ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY:

DATE REPORTED:

PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): 13

Sep 04, 2015

VERSION*: 1

Should you require any information regarding this analysis please contact your client services representative at (905) 712-5100

15T014236AGAT WORK ORDER:

ATTENTION TO: Emily Casey

PROJECT: 1536748

Laboratories (V1) Page 1 of 13

All samples will be disposed of within 30 days following analysis. Please contact the lab if you require additional sample storage time.

AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.

Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta (APEGGA)Western Enviro-Agricultural Laboratory Association (WEALA)Environmental Services Association of Alberta (ESAA)

Member of:

*NOTES

Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items testedAll reportable information as specified by ISO 17025:2005 is available from AGAT Laboratories upon request

DUP-3SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

WaterSAMPLE TYPE:

9/1/2015DATE SAMPLED:

6925097G / S RDLUnitParameter

<25F1 (C6 to C10) 25µg/L

<25F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX 25750µg/L

<100F2 (C10 to C16) 100150µg/L

<100F3 (C16 to C34) 100500µg/L

<100F4 (C34 to C50) 100500µg/L

NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 500500µg/L

Acceptable LimitsUnitSurrogate

94Terphenyl % 60-140

Comments: RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to Table 2: Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Potable Ground Water Condition - Potable Ground Water - All Types of Property Uses - Coarse Textured Soils

6925097 The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using Toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and nC34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16 - C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 Hydrocarbons indicated that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.The chromatogram has returned to baseline by the retention time of nC50.Total C6-C50 results are corrected for BTEX contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.Fractions 1-4 are quantified with the contribution of PAHs. Under Ontario Regulation 153, results are considered valid without determining the PAH contribution if not requested by the client.

Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested

DATE RECEIVED: 2015-09-01

Certificate of Analysis

ATTENTION TO: Emily CaseyCLIENT NAME: GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD.

AGAT WORK ORDER: 15T014236

DATE REPORTED: 2015-09-04

PROJECT: 1536748

O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (-BTEX) (Water)

SAMPLED BY:Kyle ShearerSAMPLING SITE:




CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)

Certified By:Page 3 of 13

BH15-2SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

WaterSAMPLE TYPE:



<25F1 (C6 to C10) 25µg/L

<25F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX 25750µg/L

<100F2 (C10 to C16) 100150µg/L

<100F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene 100150µg/L

<100F3 (C16 to C34) 100500µg/L

<100F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs 100500µg/L

<100F4 (C34 to C50) 100500µg/L

NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 500500µg/L



Comments: RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to Table 2: Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Potable Ground Water Condition - Potable Ground Water - All Types of Property Uses - Coarse Textured Soils

6925092 The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using Toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and nC34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16 - C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 Hydrocarbons indicated that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.The chromatogram has returned to baseline by the retention time of nC50.Total C6-C50 results are corrected for BTEX and PAH contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.







PROJECT: 1536748

O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Water)

SAMPLED BY:Kyle ShearerSAMPLING SITE:






O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Water)

Naphthalene TW < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 98% 50% 140% 74% 50% 140% 80% 50% 140%

Acenaphthylene TW < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 97% 50% 140% 76% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140%

Acenaphthene TW < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 95% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140%

Fluorene TW < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 94% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140% 79% 50% 140%

Phenanthrene

TW < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 86% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140%

Anthracene TW < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 94% 50% 140% 80% 50% 140% 80% 50% 140%

Fluoranthene TW < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 96% 50% 140% 81% 50% 140% 81% 50% 140%

Pyrene TW < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 97% 50% 140% 81% 50% 140% 81% 50% 140%

Benz(a)anthracene TW < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 90% 50% 140% 87% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140%

Chrysene

TW < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 98% 50% 140% 90% 50% 140% 89% 50% 140%

Benzo(b)fluoranthene TW < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 99% 50% 140% 82% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140%

Benzo(k)fluoranthene TW < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 101% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140% 76% 50% 140%

Benzo(a)pyrene TW < 0.01 < 0.01 0.0% < 0.01 104% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140% 79% 50% 140%

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene TW < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 91% 50% 140% 70% 50% 140% 66% 50% 140%

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

TW < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 91% 50% 140% 71% 50% 140% 68% 50% 140%

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene TW < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 86% 50% 140% 65% 50% 140% 60% 50% 140%

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene TW < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 109% 50% 140% 76% 50% 140% 80% 50% 140%

O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Water)

Dichlorodifluoromethane 6923342 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 90% 50% 140% 105% 50% 140% 102% 50% 140%

Vinyl Chloride 6923342 < 0.17 < 0.17 0.0% < 0.17 117% 50% 140% 109% 50% 140% 99% 50% 140%

Bromomethane 6923342 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 109% 50% 140% 103% 50% 140% 102% 50% 140%

Trichlorofluoromethane 6923342 < 0.40 < 0.40 0.0% < 0.40 107% 50% 140% 104% 50% 140% 105% 50% 140%

Acetone

6923342 < 1.0 < 1.0 0.0% < 1.0 109% 50% 140% 114% 50% 140% 111% 50% 140%

1,1-Dichloroethylene 6923342 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.0% < 0.30 103% 50% 140% 106% 60% 130% 105% 50% 140%

Methylene Chloride 6923342 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.0% < 0.30 116% 50% 140% 114% 60% 130% 120% 50% 140%

trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 6923342 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 97% 50% 140% 90% 60% 130% 96% 50% 140%

Methyl tert-butyl ether 6923342 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 88% 50% 140% 96% 60% 130% 108% 50% 140%

1,1-Dichloroethane

6923342 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.0% < 0.30 113% 50% 140% 108% 60% 130% 107% 50% 140%

Methyl Ethyl Ketone 6923342 < 1.0 < 1.0 0.0% < 1.0 105% 50% 140% 103% 50% 140% 102% 50% 140%

cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 6923342 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 102% 50% 140% 111% 60% 130% 104% 50% 140%

Chloroform 6923342 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 103% 50% 140% 115% 60% 130% 106% 50% 140%

1,2-Dichloroethane 6923342 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 99% 50% 140% 107% 60% 130% 120% 50% 140%

1,1,1-Trichloroethane

6923342 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.0% < 0.30 87% 50% 140% 101% 60% 130% 96% 50% 140%

Carbon Tetrachloride 6923342 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 84% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 103% 50% 140%

Benzene 6923342 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 97% 50% 140% 103% 60% 130% 104% 50% 140%

1,2-Dichloropropane 6923342 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 96% 50% 140% 104% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%

Trichloroethylene 6923342 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 91% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 90% 50% 140%

Bromodichloromethane

6923342 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 86% 50% 140% 93% 60% 130% 101% 50% 140%


SAMPLING SITE: SAMPLED BY:Kyle Shearer


Dup #1 RPDMeasured

ValueRecovery Recovery

Quality Assurance


CLIENT NAME: GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD.

PROJECT: 1536748

Trace Organics Analysis

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

BatchPARAMETERSample

IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Sep 04, 2015 REFERENCE MATERIAL

MethodBlank




QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V1) Page 8 of 13


Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 6923342 < 1.0 < 1.0 0.0% < 1.0 92% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140% 106% 50% 140%

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 6923342 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 123% 50% 140% 101% 60% 130% 117% 50% 140%

Toluene 6923342 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 123% 50% 140% 113% 60% 130% 115% 50% 140%

Dibromochloromethane 6923342 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 106% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 108% 50% 140%

Ethylene Dibromide

6923342 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 112% 50% 140% 99% 60% 130% 109% 50% 140%

Tetrachloroethylene 6923342 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 118% 50% 140% 109% 60% 130% 116% 50% 140%

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 6923342 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 116% 50% 140% 106% 60% 130% 111% 50% 140%

Chlorobenzene 6923342 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 117% 50% 140% 109% 60% 130% 116% 50% 140%

Ethylbenzene 6923342 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 110% 50% 140% 100% 60% 130% 107% 50% 140%

m & p-Xylene

6923342 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 112% 50% 140% 100% 60% 130% 111% 50% 140%

Bromoform 6923342 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 116% 50% 140% 88% 60% 130% 103% 50% 140%

Styrene 6923342 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 94% 50% 140% 83% 60% 130% 96% 50% 140%


o-Xylene 6923342 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 118% 50% 140% 105% 60% 130% 116% 50% 140%

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

6923342 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 108% 50% 140% 97% 60% 130% 109% 50% 140%

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 6923342 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 114% 50% 140% 102% 60% 130% 114% 50% 140%


1,3-Dichloropropene 6923342 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.0% < 0.30 88% 50% 140% 91% 60% 130% 84% 50% 140%

n-Hexane 6923342 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 87% 50% 140% 83% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%

O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Water)

F1 (C6 to C10) 6913495 < 25 < 25 0.0% < 25 78% 60% 140% 85% 60% 140% 77% 60% 140%

F2 (C10 to C16) TW < 100 < 100 0.0% < 100 96% 60% 140% 60% 60% 140% 90% 60% 140%

F3 (C16 to C34) TW < 100 < 100 0.0% < 100 98% 60% 140% 82% 60% 140% 98% 60% 140%

F4 (C34 to C50) TW < 100 < 100 0.0% < 100 98% 60% 140% 62% 60% 140% 85% 60% 140%

Comments: TW: Tap water analysis has been performed as QC sample testing for duplicate and matrix spike due to insufficient sample volume.

Certified By:




Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance



PROJECT: 1536748

Trace Organics Analysis (Continued)

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank






O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals (Comprehensive) (Water)

Antimony 6923688 <0.5 <0.5 0.0% < 0.5 96% 70% 130% 100% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%

Arsenic 6923688 <1.0 <1.0 0.0% < 1.0 98% 70% 130% 97% 80% 120% 108% 70% 130%

Barium 6923688 49.9 49.5 0.8% < 2.0 99% 70% 130% 100% 80% 120% 102% 70% 130%

Beryllium 6923688 <0.5 <0.5 0.0% < 0.5 99% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 96% 70% 130%

Boron

6923688 16.1 16.1 0.0% < 10.0 101% 70% 130% 104% 80% 120% 87% 70% 130%

Cadmium 6923688 <0.2 <0.2 0.0% < 0.2 99% 70% 130% 99% 80% 120% 111% 70% 130%

Chromium 6923688 <2.0 <2.0 0.0% < 2.0 95% 70% 130% 97% 80% 120% 97% 70% 130%

Cobalt 6923688 <0.5 <0.5 0.0% < 0.5 97% 70% 130% 98% 80% 120% 98% 70% 130%

Copper 6923688 1.5 1.5 0.0% < 1.0 97% 70% 130% 99% 80% 120% 93% 70% 130%

Lead

6923688 <0.5 <0.5 0.0% < 0.5 99% 70% 130% 100% 80% 120% 91% 70% 130%

Molybdenum 6923688 <0.5 <0.5 0.0% < 0.5 94% 70% 130% 92% 80% 120% 98% 70% 130%

Nickel 6923688 1.5 1.6 6.5% < 1.0 101% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 99% 70% 130%

Selenium 6923688 <1.0 <1.0 0.0% < 1.0 97% 70% 130% 98% 80% 120% 116% 70% 130%

Silver 6923688 <0.2 <0.2 0.0% < 0.2 100% 70% 130% 110% 80% 120% 109% 70% 130%

Thallium

6923688 <0.3 <0.3 0.0% < 0.3 104% 70% 130% 105% 80% 120% 96% 70% 130%

Uranium 6923688 1.4 1.4 0.0% < 0.5 100% 70% 130% 99% 80% 120% 98% 70% 130%

Vanadium 6923688 <0.4 <0.4 0.0% < 0.4 96% 70% 130% 97% 80% 120% 99% 70% 130%

Zinc 6923688 13.6 13.6 0.0% < 5.0 99% 70% 130% 102% 80% 120% 109% 70% 130%

Certified By:




Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance



PROJECT: 1536748

Water Analysis

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank







Naphthalene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Acenaphthylene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Acenaphthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Fluorene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Phenanthrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Anthracene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Fluoranthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Pyrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benz(a)anthracene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Chrysene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(b)fluoranthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(k)fluoranthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(a)pyrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Chrysene-d12 ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 (P&T)GC/FID

F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 (P&T)GC/FID

F2 (C10 to C16) VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC / FID



Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 BALANCE

Terphenyl VOL-91-5010 GC/FID

F2 (C10 to C16) VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID

F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID

F3 (C16 to C34) VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID

F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID

F4 (C34 to C50) VOL -91- 5010 MOE PHC- E3421 GC/FID

Dichlorodifluoromethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Vinyl Chloride VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Bromomethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Trichlorofluoromethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Acetone VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,1-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Methylene Chloride VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Methyl tert-butyl ether VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,1-Dichloroethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Methyl Ethyl Ketone VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Chloroform VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS


1,1,1-Trichloroethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Carbon Tetrachloride VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Benzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,2-Dichloropropane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Trichloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS




Method Summary



PROJECT: 1536748

AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER




METHOD SUMMARY (V1) Page 11 of 13

Bromodichloromethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS


Toluene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Dibromochloromethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Ethylene Dibromide VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Tetrachloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Chlorobenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Ethylbenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

m & p-Xylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Bromoform VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Styrene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS


o-Xylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,3-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS



1,3-Dichloropropene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Xylene Mixture VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

n-Hexane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Toluene-d8 VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

4-Bromofluorobenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Water Analysis

Antimony MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Arsenic MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Barium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Beryllium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Boron MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Cadmium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Chromium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Cobalt MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Copper MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Lead MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Molybdenum MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Nickel MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Selenium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Silver MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Thallium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Uranium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Vanadium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Zinc MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS




Method Summary



PROJECT: 1536748






Pag

e 13

of 1

3





Anthony Dapaah, PhD (Chem), Inorganic Lab ManagerSOIL ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY:

Oksana Gushyla, Trace Organics Lab SupervisorTRACE ORGANICS REVIEWED BY:

DATE REPORTED:


Aug 28, 2015

VERSION*: 1




PROJECT: 1536748





Member of:

*NOTES


BH15-3 SA#4B15-2 SA#1 BH15-4 SA#2SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

SoilSoilSoilSAMPLE TYPE:

8/19/2015 8/19/20158/19/2015DATE SAMPLED:

6902388 6902391 6902394G / S RDLUnitParameter

<0.8 <0.8 <0.8Antimony 0.87.5µg/g

2 2 2Arsenic 118µg/g

<5 <5 <5Boron 5120µg/g

37 46 31Barium 2390µg/g

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5Beryllium 0.54µg/g

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5Cadmium 0.51.2µg/g

12 10 9Chromium 2160µg/g

4.1 4.0 3.2Cobalt 0.522µg/g

8 8 7Copper 1140µg/g

15 4 4Lead 1120µg/g

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5Molybdenum 0.56.9µg/g

7 6 5Nickel 1100µg/g

<0.4 <0.4 <0.4Selenium 0.42.4µg/g

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2Silver 0.220µg/g

<0.4 <0.4 <0.4Thallium 0.41µg/g

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5Uranium 0.523µg/g

18 16 16Vanadium 186µg/g

36 22 15Zinc 5340µg/g

Comments: RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to Table 2: Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Potable Ground Water Condition - Soil - Residential/Parkland/Institutional Property Use - Coarse Textured Soils







PROJECT: 1536748

O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals (Comprehensive) (Soil)

SAMPLED BY:SAMPLING SITE:






BH15-3 SA#5B15-2 SA#1SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

SoilSoilSAMPLE TYPE:

8/19/20158/19/2015DATE SAMPLED:

6902388 6902393G / S RDLUnitParameter

7.32 7.94pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction NApH Units

Comments: RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard

6902388-6902393 pH was determined on the 0.01M CaCl2 extract obtained from 2:1 leaching procedure (2 parts extraction fluid:1 part wet soil).







PROJECT: 1536748

O. Reg. 153(511) - ORPs (Soil) pH







BH15-3 SA#4B15-2 SA#1 BH15-4 SA#2SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

SoilSoilSoilSAMPLE TYPE:

8/19/2015 8/19/20158/19/2015DATE SAMPLED:

6902388 6902391 6902394G / S RDLUnitParameter

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Naphthalene 0.050.6µg/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthylene 0.050.15µg/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthene 0.057.9µg/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Fluorene 0.0562µg/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Phenanthrene 0.056.2µg/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Anthracene 0.050.67µg/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Fluoranthene 0.050.69µg/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Pyrene 0.0578µg/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Benz(a)anthracene 0.050.5µg/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Chrysene 0.057µg/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.050.78µg/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.050.78µg/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(a)pyrene 0.050.3µg/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.050.38µg/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.050.1µg/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.056.6µg/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.052-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 0.050.99µg/g

7.2 7.8 14.2Moisture Content 0.1%


57 66 61Chrysene-d12 % 50-140


6902388-6902394 Results are based on the dry weight of the soil.Note: The result for Benzo(b)Fluoranthene is the total of the Benzo(b)&(j)Fluoranthene isomers because the isomers co-elute on the GC column.







PROJECT: 1536748

O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil)







BH15-2 SA#3SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

SoilSAMPLE TYPE:



<5F1 (C6 to C10) 5µg/g

<5F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX 555µg/g

<10F2 (C10 to C16) 1098µg/g

<50F3 (C16 to C34) 50300µg/g

<50F4 (C34 to C50) 502800µg/g

NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 502800µg/g

5.7Moisture Content 0.1%




6902396 Results are based on sample dry weight.The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and n-C34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16-C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 hydrocarbons indicates that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.The chromatogram has returned to baseline by the retention time of nC50.Total C6 - C50 results are corrected for BTEX contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 + nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.Fractions 1-4 are quantified without the contribution of PAHs. Under Ontario Regulation 153, results are considered valid without determining the PAH contribution if not requested by the client.







PROJECT: 1536748

O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (-BTEX) (Soil)







O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals (Comprehensive) (Soil)

Antimony 6893098 <0.8 <0.8 0.0% < 0.8 93% 70% 130% 100% 80% 120% 95% 70% 130%

Arsenic 6893098 1 1 0.0% < 1 108% 70% 130% 88% 80% 120% 89% 70% 130%

Boron 6893098 6 6 0.0% < 5 75% 70% 130% 108% 80% 120% 91% 70% 130%

Barium 6893098 409 391 4.5% < 2 95% 70% 130% 96% 80% 120% 95% 70% 130%

Beryllium

6893098 0.8 0.8 0.0% < 0.5 93% 70% 130% 105% 80% 120% 89% 70% 130%

Cadmium 6893098 <0.5 <0.5 0.0% < 0.5 104% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 96% 70% 130%

Chromium 6893098 61 60 1.7% < 2 85% 70% 130% 104% 80% 120% 106% 70% 130%

Cobalt 6893098 15.0 14.6 2.7% < 0.5 90% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 93% 70% 130%

Copper 6893098 28 27 3.6% < 1 87% 70% 130% 102% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%

Lead

6893098 9 9 0.0% < 1 97% 70% 130% 94% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%

Molybdenum 6893098 0.6 0.6 0.0% < 0.5 99% 70% 130% 98% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%

Nickel 6893098 30 29 3.4% < 1 89% 70% 130% 99% 80% 120% 89% 70% 130%

Selenium 6893098 0.6 0.4 NA < 0.4 116% 70% 130% 94% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%

Silver 6893098 <0.2 <0.2 0.0% < 0.2 85% 70% 130% 102% 80% 120% 99% 70% 130%

Thallium

6893098 <0.4 <0.4 0.0% < 0.4 89% 70% 130% 99% 80% 120% 97% 70% 130%

Uranium 6893098 1.1 1.1 0.0% < 0.5 95% 70% 130% 94% 80% 120% 91% 70% 130%

Vanadium 6893098 64 62 3.2% < 1 87% 70% 130% 99% 80% 120% 98% 70% 130%

Zinc 6893098 112 110 1.8% < 5 98% 70% 130% 102% 80% 120% 93% 70% 130%

Comments: NA Signifies Not Applicable.RPD Qualifier for Selenium: As the average value for the sample and a duplicate is less than 5X RDL, lab's RPD acceptance criteria is not applicable.

O. Reg. 153(511) - ORPs (Soil) pH

pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction 6902757 7.17 7.26 1.2% NA 100% 90% 110% NA NA

Comments: NA signifies Not Applicable.

Certified By:


SAMPLING SITE: SAMPLED BY:


Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance



PROJECT: 1536748

Soil Analysis

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Aug 28, 2015 REFERENCE MATERIAL

MethodBlank






O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil)

Naphthalene 6900012 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 121% 50% 140% 99% 50% 140% 62% 50% 140%

Acenaphthylene 6900012 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 108% 50% 140% 82% 50% 140% 51% 50% 140%

Acenaphthene 6900012 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 114% 50% 140% 87% 50% 140% 58% 50% 140%

Fluorene 6900012 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 102% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140% 52% 50% 140%

Phenanthrene

6900012 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 94% 50% 140% 68% 50% 140% 56% 50% 140%

Anthracene 6900012 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 100% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140% 62% 50% 140%

Fluoranthene 6900012 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 95% 50% 140% 69% 50% 140% 76% 50% 140%

Pyrene 6900012 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 73% 50% 140% 80% 50% 140%

Benz(a)anthracene 6900012 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 65% 50% 140% 96% 50% 140% 58% 50% 140%

Chrysene

6900012 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 113% 50% 140% 72% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140%

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 6900012 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 91% 50% 140% 97% 50% 140% 58% 50% 140%

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 6900012 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 125% 50% 140% 81% 50% 140% 91% 50% 140%

Benzo(a)pyrene 6900012 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 100% 50% 140% 66% 50% 140% 72% 50% 140%

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 6900012 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 85% 50% 140% 99% 50% 140% 56% 50% 140%

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

6900012 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 83% 50% 140% 94% 50% 140% 52% 50% 140%

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 6900012 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 104% 50% 140% 62% 50% 140%

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 6900012 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 106% 50% 140% 91% 50% 140% 60% 50% 140%

O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Soil)


Vinyl Chloride 6900025 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 127% 50% 140% 112% 50% 140% 82% 50% 140%

Bromomethane 6900025 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 107% 50% 140% 103% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140%


Acetone

6900025 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 119% 50% 140% 105% 50% 140% 88% 50% 140%



Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 6900025 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 105% 50% 140% 121% 60% 130% 79% 50% 140%

Methyl tert-butyl Ether 6900025 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 105% 50% 140% 105% 60% 130% 87% 50% 140%

1,1-Dichloroethane

6900025 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 113% 50% 140% 114% 60% 130% 84% 50% 140%


Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 6900025 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 111% 50% 140% 102% 60% 130% 70% 50% 140%

Chloroform 6900025 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 104% 50% 140% 112% 60% 130% 73% 50% 140%

1,2-Dichloroethane 6900025 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 120% 50% 140% 90% 60% 130% 75% 50% 140%


6900025 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 99% 50% 140% 93% 60% 130% 80% 50% 140%


Benzene 6900025 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 115% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 72% 50% 140%




6900025 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 100% 50% 140% 77% 60% 130% 92% 50% 140%




Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance



PROJECT: 1536748


UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank








Toluene 6900025 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 107% 50% 140% 85% 60% 130% 91% 50% 140%


Ethylene Dibromide

6900025 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 97% 50% 140% 73% 60% 130% 81% 50% 140%



Chlorobenzene 6900025 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 109% 50% 140% 93% 60% 130% 87% 50% 140%

Ethylbenzene 6900025 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 100% 50% 140% 94% 60% 130% 85% 50% 140%

m & p-Xylene

6900025 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 100% 50% 140% 83% 60% 130% 88% 50% 140%

Bromoform 6900025 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 111% 50% 140% 70% 60% 130% 70% 50% 140%

Styrene 6900025 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 118% 50% 140% 88% 60% 130% 81% 50% 140%


o-Xylene 6900025 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 106% 50% 140% 90% 60% 130% 85% 50% 140%

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

6900025 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 105% 50% 140% 84% 60% 130% 85% 50% 140%




n-Hexane 6900025 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 64% 50% 140% 88% 60% 130% 94% 50% 140%


F1 (C6 to C10) 6896645 < 5 < 5 0.0% < 5 85% 60% 130% 90% 85% 115% 77% 70% 130%

F2 (C10 to C16) 6900025 < 10 < 10 0.0% < 10 105% 60% 130% 81% 80% 120% 102% 70% 130%

F3 (C16 to C34) 6900025 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 99% 60% 130% 85% 80% 120% 119% 70% 130%

F4 (C34 to C50) 6900025 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 89% 60% 130% 82% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%

Certified By:




Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance



PROJECT: 1536748


UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank






Soil Analysis

Antimony MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Arsenic MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Boron MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Barium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Beryllium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Cadmium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Chromium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Cobalt MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Copper MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Lead MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Molybdenum MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Nickel MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Selenium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Silver MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Thallium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Uranium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Vanadium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Zinc MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction INOR-93-6031 MSA part 3 & SM 4500-H+ B pH METER




Method Summary



PROJECT: 1536748







Naphthalene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Acenaphthylene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Acenaphthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Fluorene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Phenanthrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benz(a)anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Chrysene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(b)fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(k)fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(a)pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Moisture Content ORG-91-5106 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8270 BALANCE

Chrysene-d12 ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035 P &T GC / FID

F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035 P & T GC / FID

F2 (C10 to C16) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID



Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS

Moisture Content VOL-91-5009CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035,8015

BALANCE









Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Methyl tert-butyl Ether VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS



Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS













Method Summary



PROJECT: 1536748






























Method Summary



PROJECT: 1536748






Pag

e 14

of 1

4





Neli Popnikolova, Senior ChemistTRACE ORGANICS REVIEWED BY:

DATE REPORTED:


Sep 11, 2015

VERSION*: 1




PROJECT: 1536748





Member of:

*NOTES


TP-04 SA4SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

SoilSAMPLE TYPE:



<5F1 (C6 to C10) 5µg/g

<5F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX 555µg/g

<10F2 (C10 to C16) 1098µg/g

<50F3 (C16 to C34) 50300µg/g

<50F4 (C34 to C50) 502800µg/g

NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 502800µg/g

15.3Moisture Content 0.1%




6949992 Results are based on sample dry weight.The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and n-C34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16-C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 hydrocarbons indicates that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.The chromatogram has returned to baseline by the retention time of nC50.Total C6 - C50 results are corrected for BTEX contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 + nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.Fractions 1-4 are quantified without the contribution of PAHs. Under Ontario Regulation 153, results are considered valid without determining the PAH contribution if not requested by the client.







PROJECT: 1536748








O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Soil)


Vinyl Chloride 6950230 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 81% 50% 140% 95% 50% 140% 97% 50% 140%

Bromomethane 6950230 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 77% 50% 140% 94% 50% 140% 81% 50% 140%


Acetone

6950230 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 118% 50% 140% 94% 50% 140% 84% 50% 140%



Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 6950230 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 111% 50% 140% 70% 60% 130% 89% 50% 140%

Methyl tert-butyl Ether 6950230 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 103% 50% 140% 74% 60% 130% 72% 50% 140%

1,1-Dichloroethane

6950230 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 107% 50% 140% 77% 60% 130% 85% 50% 140%


Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 6950230 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 112% 50% 140% 73% 60% 130% 90% 50% 140%

Chloroform 6950230 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 102% 50% 140% 99% 60% 130% 88% 50% 140%

1,2-Dichloroethane 6950230 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 129% 50% 140% 100% 60% 130% 108% 50% 140%


6950230 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 105% 50% 140% 82% 60% 130% 84% 50% 140%


Benzene 6950230 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 116% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 86% 50% 140%




6950230 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 99% 50% 140% 115% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%



Toluene 6950230 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 110% 50% 140% 93% 60% 130% 94% 50% 140%


Ethylene Dibromide

6950230 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 109% 50% 140% 101% 60% 130% 103% 50% 140%



Chlorobenzene 6950230 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 109% 50% 140% 99% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%

Ethylbenzene 6950230 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 103% 50% 140% 95% 60% 130% 93% 50% 140%

m & p-Xylene

6950230 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 109% 50% 140% 102% 60% 130% 96% 50% 140%

Bromoform 6950230 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 97% 50% 140% 85% 60% 130% 83% 50% 140%

Styrene 6950230 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 100% 50% 140% 94% 60% 130% 90% 50% 140%


o-Xylene 6950230 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 113% 50% 140% 104% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

6950230 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 100% 50% 140% 101% 60% 130% 96% 50% 140%




n-Hexane 6950230 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 116% 50% 140% 77% 60% 130% 82% 50% 140%




Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance



PROJECT: 1536748


UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank







F1 (C6 to C10) 6939922 < 5 < 5 0.0% < 5 105% 60% 130% 111% 85% 115% 96% 70% 130%

F2 (C10 to C16) 6880837 < 10 < 10 0.0% < 10 104% 60% 130% 83% 80% 120% 85% 70% 130%

F3 (C16 to C34) 6880837 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 112% 60% 130% 95% 80% 120% 97% 70% 130%

F4 (C34 to C50) 6880837 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 105% 60% 130% 101% 80% 120% 103% 70% 130%

Certified By:




Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance



PROJECT: 1536748


UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank







F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035 P &T GC / FID

F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035 P & T GC / FID




Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS

Moisture Content VOL-91-5009CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035,8015

BALANCE









Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Methyl tert-butyl Ether VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS



Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
































Method Summary



PROJECT: 1536748











Method Summary



PROJECT: 1536748






Pag

e 9

of 9





Amanjot Bhela, Inorganic CoordinatorSOIL ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY:

DATE REPORTED:


Sep 16, 2015

VERSION*: 1




PROJECT: 1536748





Member of:

*NOTES


DUP1BH15-3 SA1SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

SoilSoilSAMPLE TYPE:

8/19/20158/19/2015DATE SAMPLED:

6969530 6969531G / S RDLUnitParameter

<5 <5Boron 5120µg/g

46 46Barium 2390µg/g

<0.5 <0.5Beryllium 0.54µg/g

<0.5 <0.5Cadmium 0.51.2µg/g

11 11Chromium 2160µg/g

4.1 4.2Cobalt 0.522µg/g

10 12Copper 1140µg/g

9 11Lead 1120µg/g

<0.5 <0.5Molybdenum 0.56.9µg/g

9 10Nickel 1100µg/g

<0.2 <0.2Silver 0.220µg/g

<0.4 <0.4Thallium 0.41µg/g

<0.5 0.6Uranium 0.523µg/g

17 18Vanadium 186µg/g

36 38Zinc 5340µg/g








PROJECT: 1536748

O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals (Abbrev) (Soil)







O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals (Abbrev) (Soil)

Boron 6968020 7 6 15.4% < 5 91% 70% 130% 113% 80% 120% 99% 70% 130%

Barium 6968020 122 128 4.8% < 2 95% 70% 130% 94% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%

Beryllium 6968020 0.8 0.8 0.0% < 0.5 82% 70% 130% 105% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%

Cadmium 6968020 <0.5 <0.5 0.0% < 0.5 104% 70% 130% 98% 80% 120% 96% 70% 130%

Chromium

6968020 23 23 0.0% < 2 86% 70% 130% 97% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%

Cobalt 6968020 8.7 8.7 0.0% < 0.5 86% 70% 130% 95% 80% 120% 89% 70% 130%

Copper 6968020 23 23 0.0% < 1 81% 70% 130% 98% 80% 120% 88% 70% 130%

Lead 6968020 20 21 4.9% < 1 95% 70% 130% 94% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%

Molybdenum 6968020 <0.5 <0.5 0.0% < 0.5 100% 70% 130% 100% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%

Nickel

6968020 19 19 0.0% < 1 87% 70% 130% 98% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%

Silver 6968020 <0.2 <0.2 0.0% < 0.2 71% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 95% 70% 130%

Thallium 6968020 <0.4 <0.4 0.0% < 0.4 93% 70% 130% 99% 80% 120% 95% 70% 130%

Uranium 6968020 0.9 0.9 0.0% < 0.5 90% 70% 130% 89% 80% 120% 89% 70% 130%

Vanadium 6968020 31 31 0.0% < 1 86% 70% 130% 93% 80% 120% 89% 70% 130%

Zinc

6968020 74 73 1.4% < 5 88% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%

Certified By:




Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance



PROJECT: 1536748

Soil Analysis

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank






Soil Analysis

Boron MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Barium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Beryllium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Cadmium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Chromium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Cobalt MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Copper MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Lead MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Molybdenum MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Nickel MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Silver MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Thallium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Uranium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Vanadium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Zinc MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS




Method Summary



PROJECT: 1536748






Pag

e 5

of 5


APPENDIX A (V) Plan of Survey



APPENDIX A (VII) Phase One Conceptual Site Model


Golder Associates Ltd. 100, Scotia Court Whitby, Ontario, L1N 8Y6 Canada T: +1 (905) 723 2727

Documents

REPORT - City of Pickering Land Development ... Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of ... 2011. The applicable site condition standards were selected