Report on criteria for location for plant

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 Report on criteria for location for plant

    1/15

  • 7/27/2019 Report on criteria for location for plant

    2/15

    1.0 Introduction/Objective

    2.0 Conceptual framework

    3.0 Case Study

    - Case overview

    - Methodology

    - Results

    - Conclusion

    4.0 Teams Recommendations

    Contents

  • 7/27/2019 Report on criteria for location for plant

    3/15

    1.1 Introduction

    Title:Capabilities, Strategies and Performance amongst theHollywood Studios

    Source:Strategic Management Journal dated 21 May 2009

    Author:Jamal Shamsie, Xavier Martin and Danny Miller

  • 7/27/2019 Report on criteria for location for plant

    4/15

    1.2 Objective

    4

    Replication

    Renewal

    Strategies

    Products

    Markets

    DYNAMICcapabilities

    Availability ofresources

    Industry demand

    Critical success

    factors

    Financialperformance

    Goals

    Turbulent business environment

    Project based industries

  • 7/27/2019 Report on criteria for location for plant

    5/15

    2.1 Conceptual frameworkDynamic Capability Development Strategy

    Dynamic capability is defined as capacity of an organization topurposefully create, extend or modify its resource base.

    Com

    petitor

    Differentiated

    replication

    Differentiated

    renewal

    Undifferentiatedrenewal

    Types of strategies:

    Undifferentiatedreplication

    Didntexperiencesu

    ccess

    Experiencedsuccess

    C o r p o r a t i o n

    Experienced success Didnt experience success

  • 7/27/2019 Report on criteria for location for plant

    6/15

    2.2 Conceptual frameworkHypothesis

    Differentiated Replication strategy

    Differentiated Renewal strategy

    Strategy

    That provide access to similarmarkets/clients

    Access to larger pool of knowledge/

    skill

    Resources

    Strong overall industry demand

    Considerable shifts in the level ofdemand

    Industry

    STRONG

    FINANCIAL

    PERFORMA

    NCE

  • 7/27/2019 Report on criteria for location for plant

    7/15

    3.1 Case studyoverview

    Overview:Hollywood film industry from 1936 to 1965.

    15 genres : action/adventure, comedy, crime/gangster, drama,

    fantasy, historical, horror, musical, mystery, romance, romantic,

    comedy, science-fiction, thriller, war and western.

    Objectives of Studios: Target maximum audience segments

    Offer a yearly line up of new films with a wide variety of genres Each studio was releasing films in 9-12 genres/year; generally

    covering all genes in 2 years time.

  • 7/27/2019 Report on criteria for location for plant

    8/15

    contd.

    Dynamic Capability Aspects:

    Selective emphasis on various genres at different times:

    Differentiated replication:- genres which were successful before

    Differentiated renewal:- capture success ahead of competition in new

    genres

  • 7/27/2019 Report on criteria for location for plant

    9/15

    3.2 Case studyMethodology

    Sample: 7,124 films All films released by 7 major studios from 1936 to

    1965 i.e. MGM,Twentieth Century-Fox, Warner Brothers,Paramount, United Artists, Universal and Columbia.

    Performance variable: Return on Sales(RoS)

    Strategy variable: To derive strategy variable, list ofgenres of last 10 most revenue generating movies for the

    studio and its competitors was considered.

  • 7/27/2019 Report on criteria for location for plant

    10/15

    3.2 Case studyMethodology contd.

    Interaction Variables:

    a) Resources:i) Replication : Owned Theatres

    ii) Renewal : Top starts with long term contracts

    b) Industry Demand :

    i) Replication : % age of household recreational spending devoted tomovie audience

    ii) Renewal : No. of new genres amongst top 10 films for the

    industry

    Analysis:

    a) data considered for 7 studios for 29 years (N=203)

    b) two different ways of data analysis, got similar results

    3 3 C d

  • 7/27/2019 Report on criteria for location for plant

    11/15

    3.3 Case studyfindings

    ROS

    Lo

    w

    High

    Differentiated replication

    No theatersMany theaters

    ROS

    Lo

    w

    High

    Differentiated renewal

    Few starsMany stars

    ROS

    Lo

    w

    High

    Differentiated replication

    Low spending

    High spending

    ROS

    Lo

    w

    High

    Differentiated renewal

    Few new genres

    Many new genres

    Respources

    Demand

    Owned theatres Stars under contract

    Consumer spending New genres in top 10

  • 7/27/2019 Report on criteria for location for plant

    12/15

    3.4 Case studyconclusion on hypothesis

    DifferentiatedRenewalstrategy

    Access tolarger pool ofknowledge/skill

    Considerableshifts in thelevel ofdemand

    DifferentiatedReplicationstrategy

    That provideaccess tosimilarmarkets/clients

    Strong overallindustrydemand

    Stronge

    rFinancial

    performan

    ce

    Strategy Resources Industry

  • 7/27/2019 Report on criteria for location for plant

    13/15

    4.0 Teams recommendationsTeam strongly agrees with the findings of the case study because

    of following reasons:

    a) Data collection

    b) Data analysis

    c) Compatibility with the theoretical concepts of

    Strategic Management:

    The differentiated approach to marketing results in price premium and

    hence better profitability

    The availability of competent resources

    Markets are moving targets. Products/services should be adapted to

    match the lateral/incipient demands of the customers

  • 7/27/2019 Report on criteria for location for plant

    14/15

    WHY HOW WHO WHEN WHERE

  • 7/27/2019 Report on criteria for location for plant

    15/15