report theme grey - South Staffordshire · Draft IDR 17/2/17 MGH/19/2/17 Rev A MGH 24/2/17 MGH 24/2/17 : White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal ... 1.5 The proposal is

gva.co.uk

Appendix I Landscape and Visual Appraisal, prepared by FPCR

Trebor Developments LLP

White Hill, Kinver

LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL APPRAISAL

24 February 2017

FPCR Environment and Design Ltd Registered Office: Lockington Hall, Lockington, Derby DE74 2RH Company No. 07128076. [T] 01509 672772 [F] 01509 674565 [E] [email protected] [W] www.fpcr.co.uk This report is the property of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd and is issued on the condition it is not reproduced, retained or disclosed to any unauthorised person, either wholly or in part without the written consent of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd. Ordnance Survey material is used with permission of The Controller of HMSO, Crown copyright 100018896.

Rev Issue Status Prepared / Date Approved/Date

Draft IDR 17/2/17 MGH/19/2/17

Rev A MGH 24/2/17 MGH 24/2/17

White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx

fpcr

1

CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 2

2.0 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 3

3.0 PLANNING POLICY ............................................................................................................. 6

4.0 BASELINE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... 10

5.0 LANDSCAPE PROPOSALS ............................................................................................... 19

6.0 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL EFFECTS .............................................................................. 20

7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................... 26

FIGURES

Figure 1: Site Location Plan

Figure 2: Landscape Character

Figure.3: Topography Plan

Figure 4: Aerial Photograph

Figure 5: Visual Appraisal

Figure 6: Photo Viewpoints

APPENDICES

Appendix A: LVIA Methodology & Assessment Criteria

Appendix B: Landscape Effects Table

Appendix C: Visual Effects Table

Appendix D: Sketch Appraisal Plans 1244-12 Rev A & B and 1244 - 02



fpcr

2

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 This Landscape and Visual Appraisal (LVA) has been carried out for the proposed development

allocation by FPCR Environment and Design Ltd (FPCR). The purpose of this LVA study is to

provide an assessment of the likely landscape and visual effects of the proposed development site.

The landscape and visual effects have been considered in relation to the indicative proposals

detailed in the Sketch Appraisals 1244-12 Rev A & B and 1244 - 02 (Refer to Appendix D).

1.2 FPCR are a multi-disciplinary environmental and design consultancy with over 50 years’

experience of architecture, landscape, ecology, urban design, masterplanning and environmental

impact assessment. The practice is a member of the Landscape Institute and Institute of

Environmental Management and Assessment and are frequently called upon to provide expert

evidence on landscape and visual issues at Public and Local Plan Inquiries.

Site Location

1.3 The site is situated on land to the south of White Hill along the western settlement edge of Kinver,

a large village in South Staffordshire.

1.4 Figure 1 shows the location and context of the site.

Proposed Development

1.5 The proposal is for a residential development of 30 dwellings (Area A 3.57 acres shown on Sketch

Appraisal 1244-12 Rev A) on land with a draft allocation, incorporating areas of public open space

and structural landscape planting.

1.6 A second option is also considered in this LVIA showing an increased area of development which

would yield up to 57 dwellings and would include comprehensive green infrastructure (Area A 6.57

acres shown on Sketch Appraisal 1244-12 Rev B).

1.7 A third option showing Approximately 100 dwellings is shown on drawing 122 – 02.



fpcr

3

2.0 METHODOLOGY

2.1 This LVA has been prepared based upon the Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact

Assessment, third edition (GLVIA3), published by the Landscape Institute and the Institute of

Environmental Management and Assessment, in 2013.

2.2 In summary the GVLIA3 states:

“Landscape and Visual impact assessment (LVIA), is a tool used to identify and assess the

significance of and the effects of change resulting from development on both landscape as an

environmental resource in its own right and on people’s views and visual amenity.”

2.3 There are two components of LVIA:

Assessment of landscape effects; assessing effects on the landscape as a resource in its own

right;

Assessment of visual effects: assessing effects on specific views and on the general visual

amenity experienced by people.

2.4 The components of this report include: baseline studies; description and details of the landscape

proposals and mitigation measures to be adopted as part of the scheme; identification and

description of likely effects arising from the proposed development; and an assessment of the

significance of these effects.

2.5 In terms of baseline studies the assessment provides an understanding of the landscape in the

area to be affected, its constituent elements, character, condition and value. For the visual baseline

this includes an understanding of the area in which the development may be visible, the people

who may experience views, and the nature of views.

Assessment of Landscape Effects

2.6 GLVIA3 states that “An assessment of landscape effects deals with the effects of change and

development on landscape as a resource”. The baseline landscape is described by reference to

existing landscape character assessments and by a description of the site and its context.

2.7 A range of landscape effects can arise through development. These can include:

Change or loss of elements, features, aesthetic or perceptual aspects that contribute to the

character and distinctiveness of the landscape

Addition of new elements that influence character and distinctiveness of the landscape

Combined effects of these changes

2.8 The characteristics of the existing landscape resource are considered in respect of the

susceptibility of the landscape resource to the change arising from this development. The value of

the existing landscape is also considered.

2.9 Each effect on landscape receptors is assessed in terms of size or scale, geographical extent of

the area influenced and its duration and reversibility. In terms of size or scale, the judgement takes

account of the extent of the existing landscape elements that will be lost or changed, and the

degree to which the aesthetic or perceptual aspects or key characteristics of the landscape will be

altered by removal or addition of new elements.



fpcr

4

2.10 The overall landscape effect is determined by considering the sensitivity of the landscape receptors

and the magnitude of effect on the landscape. Final conclusions on the overall landscape effects

are drawn from the assessment components described.

2.11 This appraisal describes the nature of the landscape effects. The criteria used in the appraisal are

set out in Appendix A.

Assessment of Visual Effects

2.12 An assessment of visual effects deals with the effects of change and development on the views

available to people and their visual amenity.

2.13 The first stage in the assessment is to map approximate visibility. This can be done by a computer

Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV), or by manual methods, using map study and field evaluation.

A series of viewpoints are included within the assessment that are representative of views towards

the site from surrounding visual receptors. Other views of the site are included where it supports

the description and understanding of the site`s landscape and visual characteristics.

2.14 The views also typically represent what can be seen from a variety of distances from the

development and different viewing experiences.

2.15 It is important to remember that visual receptors are all people. For each affected viewpoint, the

assessment considers both susceptibility to change in views and the value attached to views. The

visual receptors most susceptible to change are generally likely to include:

residents at home

people engaged in outdoor recreation, including use of public rights of way, whose attention or

interest is likely to be focused on the landscape or particular views;

visitors to heritage assets or other attractions, where views of surroundings are an important

contributor to the experience;

communities where views contribute to the landscape setting enjoyed by residents in the area.

2.16 Travellers on road, rail or other transport routes tend to fall into an intermediate category of

susceptibility to change. Where travel involves recognised scenic routes awareness of views is

likely to be particularly high.

2.17 Visual receptors likely to be less sensitive to change include:

People engaged in outdoor sport or recreation which does not involve or depend upon

appreciation of views of the landscape;

People at their place of work whose attention may be focused on their work or activity, not on

their surroundings.

2.18 Each of the visual effects is evaluated in terms of its size or scale, the geographical extent of the

area influenced and its duration or reversibility.

2.19 In terms of size or scale, the magnitude of visual effects takes account of:

The scale of the change in the view with respect to the loss or addition of features in the view

and changes in its composition, including proportion of the view occupied by the proposed

development;



fpcr

5

The degree of contrast or integration of any new features or changes in the landscape with the

existing or remaining landscape elements and characteristics in terms of form, scale and mass,

line height, colour and texture;

The nature of the view of the proposed development, in terms of the relative amount of time

over which it will be experienced and whether views will be full, partial or glimpses.

2.20 The geographical extent of the visual effect in each viewpoint is likely to reflect:

The angle of view in relation to the main activity of the receptor

The distance of the viewpoint from the proposed development

The extent of the area over which the changes would be visible.

2.21 As with landscape effects, the duration of the effect could be short to long term or permanent and

the same definitions apply. The criteria used in this appraisal are included at Appendix A.

Overall Landscape and Visual Effects

2.22 The final conclusions on effects, whether adverse or beneficial, are drawn from the separate

judgements on the sensitivity of the receptors and the magnitude of the effects. This overall

judgement involves a reasoned professional overview of the individual judgements against the

criteria, to then make the overall judgement.

2.23 For this appraisal, the following descriptive thresholds have been used with regard to effects:-

Major: An effect that will fundamentally change and be in direct contrast to the existing

landscape or views;

Moderate: An effect that will markedly change the existing landscape or views but may retain

or incorporate some characteristics/ features currently present;

Minor: An effect that will entail limited or localised change to the existing landscape/ views or

will entail more noticeable localised change but including both adverse and beneficial effects

and is likely to retain or incorporate some characteristics/ features currently present;

Negligible: An effect that will be discernible yet of very limited change to the existing landscape

or views.



fpcr

6

3.0 PLANNING POLICY

National Planning Policy

National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, 2012)

3.1 The NPPF sets out the Government’s planning polices for England and how these are expected to

be applied. At the heart of the NPPF is the presumption in the favour of sustainable development.

Paragraph 6 states:

“The purpose of the planning system is to contribute to the achievement of sustainable

development.”

3.2 The three dimensions to delivering sustainable development are: economic, social and

environmental.

“an environmental role - contributing to protecting and enhancing our natural, built and

historic environment; and, as part of this, helping to improve biodiversity, use natural

resources prudently, minimise waste and pollution, and mitigate and adapt to climate

change including moving to a low carbon economy.” (para 7)

3.3 The core planning principles include the following:

“always seek to secure high quality design and a good standard of amenity for all existing

and future occupants of land and buildings”;

take account of the different roles and character of different areas, promoting the vitality

of our main urban areas, protecting the Green Belts around them, recognising the intrinsic

character and beauty of the countryside and supporting thriving rural communities within

it” (para 17)

3.4 The NPPF supports good design to enhance the quality of the built and natural environment.

“The Government attaches great importance to the design of the built environment. Good

design is a key aspect of sustainable development, is indivisible from good planning, and

should contribute positively to making places better for people” (para 56)

3.5 “Planning polices and decisions should aim to ensure that development:

Establishes a strong sense of place, using streetscapes and buildings to create attractive

and comfortable places to live, work and visit;

Optimise the potential of the site to accommodate development, create and sustain an

appropriate mix of uses (including incorporation of green and other public space as part of

developments) and support local facilities and transport networks;

Respond to local character and history, and reflect the identity of local surroundings and

materials, while not preventing or discouraging appropriate innovation; and

Are visually attractive as a result of good architecture and appropriate landscaping.” (para

58)

3.6 The NPPF seeks to conserve and enhance the natural environment – protecting and enhancing

valued landscapes, and affording great weight to the protection of areas of natural and scenic

beauty, such as National Parks, the Broads and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.



fpcr

7

“The planning system should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by:

Protecting and enhancing valued landscapes, geological conservation interests and soils’” (para

109)

“Local planning authorities should set criteria based policies against which proposals for a

development on or affecting protected wildlife or geodiversity sites or landscape areas will be

judged. Distinctions should be made between the hierarchy of international, national and locally

designated sites so that protection is commensurate with their status and gives appropriate weight

to their importance and the contribution that they make to wider ecological networks.” (para 113)

“Local planning authorities should:

Set out a strategic approach in their Local Plans, planning positively for the creation, protection,

enhancement and management of networks of biodiversity and green infrastructure;” (para 114)

National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG, 2014)

3.7 The NPPG came into force on the 6th March 2014 and is an online planning resource which

provides guidance on the NPPF and the planning system. The NPPF continues to be the primary

document for decision making.

Local Planning Policy

A Local Plan for South Staffordshire: Core Strategy DPD (Adopted 2012)

3.8 The following policies are of relevance to landscape and visual matters and the proposed

development:

Core Policy 2: Protecting and Enhancing the Natural and Historic Environment

Core Policy 3: Sustainable Development and Climate Change

Core Policy 4: Promoting High Quality Design

Policy OC1: Development in the Open Countryside Beyond the West Midlands Green Belt

Policy EQ1: Protecting, Enhancing and Expanding Natural Assets

Policy EQ4: Protecting and Enhancing the Character and Appearance of the Landscape

Policy EQ12: Landscaping



fpcr

8

Emerging Site Allocations Document The Publication Plan January 2017

3.9 The SAD, once adopted, will set out site specific proposals and policies for the use of land to guide

future development, in order to help deliver the vision and objectives of the Core Strategy.

3.10 This is a consultation document which represents the Council’s final draft plan before it is sent to

the Secretary of State.

3.11 The following policies are of relevance to landscape and visual matters and the proposed

development:

Policy SAD2: The Housing Allocations

3.12 The northern section of the site has been strategically allocated for residential development to meet

the housing needs of Kinver settlement, described as Kinver (a) Site Ref 274 Land South of White

Hill, with a minimum dwelling delivery of 30 units.

Policy SAD3: Safeguarded Land for Longer Term Development Needs

3.13 The southern section of the site has been strategically allocated for Safeguarded Land as Kinver

(b) Site Ref 274 Land South of White Hill, 3.9ha. This safeguarded land will be retained for longer

term development needs to meet the Core Strategy plan requirements.

Policy SAD6 Green Belt, Open Countryside and Development Boundary Amendments

3.14 In order to facilitate the above strategic allocation, the site area has been taken out of the Green

Belt Designation and the Settlement Boundary of Kinver amended as appropriate.

3.15 The following SAD policies are also considered relevant with regard to new developments;

Policy SAD7: Open Space Standards

Policy SAD9: Key Development Requirements

Design & Access

Historic Environment

Open Space, Green Infrastructure & Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDs)

Other Relevant Strategies, Guidelines or Documents

Village Design Guide SPD South Staffordshire Council (2009)

3.16 This sets out the detailed considerations which the Council expects applicants and developers to

take into account in the design of new developments. It is due to be revised for integration with the

adopted Core Strategy.

3.17 Kinver Village is defined as a main service village and the following are the specific Key Design

Principles relevant to landscape and visual implications for any new development within the

settlement;

Materials

Enhancement of [Village] Entrances

Density of Development



fpcr

9

Retention of Views of the Parish Church

Enhancement of The Green Space Character

3.18 Of particular significance to the site is the key design principle of;

Roof scape: materials and details.

3.19 It states that; ‘Its valley bottom setting, below Kinver Edge, gives an unusual focus on roofscapes,

consequently requiring careful attention in building design. Particular attention should therefore be

given to the coherence of the village roofscape,’

3.20 The section on Village Entrances mentions the junction of Compton Road and Meddins Lane as

being of particular importance. Views of the site from here are well contained by intervening

structural vegetation.

Policy Summary

3.21 The Proposed Policies Map relating to the emerging Site Allocations Publication Plan strategically

allocates White Hill for residential development as SAD2 274 and shows the site within the

Development Boundary. Beyond this plot and directly south lies a further allocation of land SAD3

274 designated as Safeguarded Land, this however not shown within the Development Boundary.

Both SAD2 & SAD3 are shown as taken out of the Green Belt Designation.



fpcr

10

4.0 BASELINE CONDITIONS

Landscape Character

National Character

4.1 National Character Area (NCA) profiles have prepared by Natural England for the 159 NCA`s

defined across England. These NCA profiles include a description of the natural and cultural

features that shape the landscape, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key

drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each area’s characteristics. Figure 2 illustrates

the NCA`s and other defined character areas within the context of the site.

4.2 At this very broad landscape scale, the site, lies within Natural England's National Character Area

(NCA) 66 ‘Mid Severn Sandstone Plateau’. This NCA stretches from Telford in the north to

Stourport on Severn in the south and therefore covers a very extensive landscape tract. Under Key

Characteristics the NCA description includes the following references which are broadly relevant

to the site;

‘Extensive sandstone plateau in the core and east of the NCA underpins an undulating

landscape with tree-lined ridges; this contrasts with the irregular topography and steep,

wooded gorges of the Severn Valley in the west.

Permian and Triassic sandstones erode to free-draining, slightly acid mineral soils which

historically supported extensive heathland and grassland. In contrast, marls and sandstones

associated with Coal Measures erode to clayey (argillic) brown earth soils.

The plateau is drained by the rivers Worfe and Stour and fast-flowing streams in small wooded,

steep-sided streamside dells, locally known as dingles.

The main river is the fast-flowing Severn, flowing north to south in the west of the NCA, often

through steep, wooded gorges, the largest being the Ironbridge Gorge.

Interlocking blocks of mixed woodland and old orchards provide a well-wooded landscape and

conifer plantations combine with parklands to give an estate character.

Large, open arable fields with a weak hedgerow pattern on the plateau contrast with mixed

arable and pasture land with smaller, irregular shaped fields bounded by hedgerows with

hedgerow oaks in the west.

Traditional buildings constructed of brick vary in colour. The local Kidderminster and

Bromsgrove Sandstone features extensively. Its characteristic red colouration provides local

distinctiveness to many towns and villages and estate boundary walls.

The Stour and Severn valleys contain frequent villages and there are a number of attractive

historic towns, for example Bridgnorth and Bewdley with cores of Georgian and earlier

buildings; there are fine individual examples of timber-framed buildings in Kinver, Bewdley and

Bridgnorth.

Important manmade features include the Roman road Watling Street, the Staffordshire and

Worcestershire Canal, the M54 and the railway line that links the urban areas of Birmingham

and the Black Country in the east with Shrewsbury in the neighbouring NCA in the west.’



fpcr

11

4.1 The NCA description also states;

‘…To the east, the land rises out of the Stour Valley and the sandstone ridge at Kinver Edge

provides views across the Cannock Chase and Cank Wood and Arden NCAs.’

4.2 The following Statement of Opportunity is relevant to the site;

‘SEO 1: Protect, expand and appropriately manage the characteristic habitats of the NCA,

specifically lowland heathland, acid grasslands and woodland including orchards and hedgerows,

thus reinforcing the sense of history and reducing habitat fragmentation for the benefits that this

will bring to resource protection, biodiversity, climate regulation and the recreational and

experiential qualities of the NCA.’

Regional Landscape Character Assessment – Planning for Landscape Change: Supplementary Planning Guidance 2001 Staffordshire County Council

4.3 The Planning for Landscape Change SPG was undertaken at Regional Level for the Staffordshire

and Stoke on Trent Structure Plan 1996-2011. It subdivides the landscape into Landscape

Character Types and the site lies within the ‘Sandstone Estatelands’ LCT, specifically with a

landscape character sub-category of ‘Estatelands’.

4.4 The following are extracts of this landscape character sub-type;

‘This is a varied agricultural landscape of intensive arable production but with pockets of less

intensive pastoral farming. The rolling landform gives way to flatter land along the river valleys, but

there are dominant ridge features with scarp slopes. Prominent large-scale hill and ridge top

woodlands visually dominate the area, whilst on the mid-slopes, woodlands are sparser and of

medium scale. Many of the woodlands have a heathy character to them.

This is a landscape that appears far more wooded than it actually is, with prominent positioning of

woodlands and the coalescence of mature hedgerow oaks in places. The slopes in turn give way

to well-treed valleys where lines of poplars can occasionally be found. Increased numbers of

mature hedgerow oaks locally provide filtered views of three to four fields distance.

The unifying feature of this varied landscape is the dominance of landform over a weak medium

scale regular and irregular field pattern, although that pattern is very visible because of its position

on the slopes.

This is an area that is influenced by a number of halls, with attendant parkland and associated

estatelands. Farms are large, with extensive modern buildings and there are characteristic home

farms and estate cottages. Villages are expanding with the increase in commuter dwellings and

small lanes show the obvious signs of becoming well used rat-runs.

Where farmland abuts the conurbation the landscape reflects this influence, hedgerow deterioration

being more evident and horsey culture becoming frequent.’

4.5 The SPG provides specific guidance on tree and woodland planting for this sub-category LCT;

‘The existing ridge planting should be extended down the slopes, reflecting their heathy character.

Woodlands should be of large scale to fit into the land-cover pattern, but predominantly shaped to

landform and increasing in scale up the slopes. Field corner planting is not appropriate. On the

lower ground large scale broadleaved or mixed woodlands, shaped to field pattern or localised

landform, would fit into the existing character of the landscape. Overall a large amount of additional

woodland would be appropriate, provided long belts alongside roads are avoided, views through



fpcr

12

the landscape are retained and care is taken not to enclose areas completely with additional

woodland.’

4.1 The SPG proposes a landscape policy objective as ‘Maintenance’ for this LCT and the site does

not occupy any zones classified as ‘Areas of highest landscape sensitivity’ or ‘Landscape at risk of

rapid loss of character or quality’.

4.2 The Planning for Landscape Change character assessment can be considered as broadly

appropriate to the characteristics of the site and its immediate context.

District Landscape Sensitivity Study – South Staffordshire Landscape Sensitivity Study Update 2017 by South Staffordshire Council

4.3 The South Staffordshire Landscape Sensitivity Study has been undertaken at a District level to

inform the Sites Allocation Document January 2017, which forms part of the Local Plan. The study

sub-divides the landscape into land parcels with potential for residential development. The site has

been assessed as land parcel ‘Kinver KV11’, which describes Kinver as follows;

‘The village is located along the valley of the River Stour, below the heath and wooded sandstone

escarpment of Kinver Edge which dominate and overlooks the settlement. The village’s landscape

setting is enclosed by the woodland and river valley with the Staffordshire and Worcestershire

Canal roughly following the course of the river….A ribbon development extends from the main body

of the settlement to the west along White Hill.

The core of the village is focussed on High Street… Later residential development has grown out

to create a series of lower density suburban areas. There remains a strong historic character from

the many timber framed buildings in High Street and the rock houses on Kinver Edge.

The village can be seen as sitting within a ‘bowl’ and has a well treed character in views form higher

land. From the settlement views are dominated by the wooded escarpment and St. Peter’s Church

that rises above the village. There are also very significant areas of mainly coniferous woodland to

the north and north-west.’

4.4 The Land Cover Parcel Kinver KV11 is described thus;

‘The LCP comprises a number of regular shaped fields subdivided by hedgerows containing

prominent hedgerow trees. The land is gently undulating with an overall fall from west to east

towards the settlement edge. The eastern edge of the LCP is provided by the rear gardens of

residential dwellings in Windsor Crescent with the northern boundary being White Hill. A significant

area of woodland known as Redcliff Covert is located immediately beyond the southern LCP

boundary and wraps around to the west. The remainder of the western boundary is formed by the

end of a ribbon development along White Hill. The Staffordshire Way crosses east-west the

southernmost field. A small complex of pre-20th century buildings is located in the north eastern

corner of the LCP.’

4.5 Key characteristics are stated as;

Smooth rolling landform

Intensive arable farmland with a remnant field pattern of large, open, regular fields

Broadleaved and mixed woodlands with silver birch

Well treed stream valleys



fpcr

13

Plantations and game coverts

Parkland

Straight roads

Heathy remnants and roadside bracken

Red brick farmsteads and estate cottages

4.6 Landscape sensitivity to housing development is stated as: Medium

4.7 It goes on to justify this evaluation;

‘The LCP is subject to significant urban influences and is completely contained by built form on the

northern and eastern boundaries with further built form along part of the western boundary. The

LCP has visual appeal and there are views to the south to a wooded backdrop. The hedgerow

between the two fields in the northern part of the LCP is a significant feature as are its hedgerow

trees.’

4.8 It makes the following comments on any proposed residential development;

‘Any development would need to be located in the western part of the site to protect skyline and to

follow the topography of the LCP. The PRoW (Staffordshire Way) would need sufficient stand-off

from development and could form the basis for on-site open space provision. This would also create

a buffer area between any development and Redcliff Covert.’

4.9 Since Kinver is an historic settlement, it is considered pertinent to reference the published

Historical Environment Character Assessment South Staffordshire 2011, by South

Staffordshire Council.

4.10 The site is shown within KVHECZ5, with land associated with Potter’s Cross Farm shown as 18/19th

Century Planned Enclosure, with Redcliff Covert to the south and west of the site identified as

woodland plantations.

4.11 It states ’An Act of Parliament to enclose the former common land to the west of Kinver was passed

in 1774, which resulted in a planned enclosure pattern comprising straight field boundaries and

straightened or re-aligned road.’

Landscape Designations

4.12 The site does not lie within any national or local designation. The following designations are

however within the site’s immediate context;

4.13 Enville Hall RGP is located approximately 1km to the north west of the site. The English Heritage

records the designation as grade II listed and states;

‘A landscape park of c 1750 designed with the assistance of William Shenstone and remains of

extensive gardens of mid C19, associated with a country house.’

4.14 Kinver Camp Scheduled Ancient Monument is located 430m south of the site along the plateau of

Kinver Edge. The EH records the monument as the buried remains and earthworks of an Iron Age

univallate hill fort.

4.15 Kinver Edge National Trust Estate is located 250m south of the site. The estate incorporates Holly

Austin Rock Houses, Nanny’s Rock and a network of walking trails range across the slopes and



fpcr

14

plateau of the wooded ridgeline. A Toposcope facility is sited at the summit to interpret the

panoramic 360 degree views.

4.16 Kinver Conservation Area is located approximately 750m to the south east of the site, and is

concentrated predominantly around the medieval core of the settlement’s High Street and also

extends up along the high ground taking into account the Parish Church and Kinver’s historical

landscape of early field patterns to the south eastern settlement edge. There is no inter-visibility

between the site and the CA due to built form and structural vegetation.

4.17 The Public Right of Way ‘Staffordshire Way’ traverses west-east across the southern section of the

site, running parallel and within close proximity of Redcliff Covert.

Topography

4.18 The following should be read in conjunction with Figure 2.

Context – Landform

4.19 The village is located along the valley of the River Stour, below the heath and wooded sandstone

escarpment of Kinver Edge, which dominates and overlooks the settlement.

4.20 The topography of the site`s context is defined by the high wooded ridgeline of Kinver Edge whose

plateau ranges between 145-160m AOD. This ridgeline overlooks the site which lies within a

lowland valley depression and characterised by localised rolling and undulating landform before

the land rises to higher ground to the north and north west of the site in the vicinity of Enville, circa

200m AOD.

Site - Landform

4.21 The site generally comprises an east facing terrain, over the lower foot slopes of the rising Kinver

Edge ridgeline. The higher ground in the west of the site broadly falls towards the eastern perimeter

of the site, but with localised bluffs and hollows forming a pronounced character for the site.

4.22 A distinctive feature of the site is the centrally located bluff which straddles both the northern and

southern fields, along which runs a hedgerow structure and mature hedgerow trees.

4.23 The north western site corner is approximately 81.7m falling to 71.0m AOD in the north eastern

corner, with the south western corner approximately 87m falling to 76.7m AOD in the south east.

Site and Immediate Context

4.24 An assessment of landscape character of the site and its immediate context has been carried out,

providing a finer level of assessment than the published studies.

4.25 The site is located on land south of White Hill, a residential development extending westwards from

the village core towards the open countryside. The character of the site is evident as a break within

built form affording immediate views opening up to the south of open pastoral farmland, and defined

by the distinctive backdrop of the wooded escarpment of Kinver Edge.

4.26 The vergeside along White Hill is defined by a continuous trimmed hedgerow with access to the

site afforded by a farm gate adjacent the Potter’s Cross Farm Building complex to the eastern

corner of the site.



fpcr

15

4.27 The site itself comprises three medium scale pastoral regular shaped fields enclosed by a robust

structure of hedgerow, with some lost sections infilled with timber rail agricultural fencing.

4.28 Low voltage overhead transmission lines traverse the site diagonally southwest to northeast

forming a low level visual intrusion but which does not interfere with the wooded ridgeline skyline.

4.29 The distinctive localised landform of bluffs and hollows described in the previous section is

characteristic of the site and indeed of the surrounding landscape context, this character being

clearly evident and pronounced from both White Hill and along the public footpath Staffordshire

Way, which traverses the southern section of the site.

4.30 Another intrinsic feature of the site is the number of mature hedgerow trees within the field

enclosures imparting a strong contribution to the site character.

4.31 The experience along Staffordshire Way is initially influenced by the urbanised quality of the

adjacent housing estate of Windsor Crescent but which then opens out into open pastoral farmland

defined on both sides of the footpath corridor by undulating landform and a sense of enclosure

enhanced by the strong woodland edge of Redcliff Covert to the south and west.

4.32 The continuation of the residential development is evident to the north west with distinctive red

brick dwellings to the high ground as White Hill passes over a pronounced undulation of the rising

Kinver Edge foot slope. Additionally, a tract of land used for equine pasture lies adjacent to the

north west perimeter boundary and to the rear of residential properties along White Hill. There are

distant views north towards sequential wooded ridgelines north in the vicinity of Enville and beyond.

There is a ‘wedge’ of mid to late 20th century residential development occupying the land

immediately beyond White Hill and Enville Road.

4.33 Views from White Hill encompass the undulating farm land punctuated by mature tree canopies

and framed by development. The wooded backdrop is provided by the distinctive Kinver Edge

escarpment with residential dwellings seen nestled along the upper slopes of Comber.

Site Features

Landscape Value

4.34 In terms of "landscape value" it is appropriate to examine the role of the site and its immediate

context in terms of the range of local factors set out in the GLVIA3 (Box 5.1, page 84), and

summarised in the methodology. This considers the landscape in terms of a range of factors as set

out below. As a starting point, landscape designations have been considered.

4.35 Landscape Designations: The site and adjacent land is not subject to any national, local or other

landscape designations. The wider landscape context includes the National Trust Estate at Kinver

Edge, Kinver Camp SAM, , Enville Registered Park and Garden and Kinver Conservation Area.

4.36 Landscape Quality (Condition): The landscape of the site encompasses pastoral farmland with a

relatively intact and continuous field enclosure incorporating well maintained hedgerow and post

and rail agricultural fencing. There are many mature hedgerow trees with well formed canopies.

Overall the landscape can be considered to be in good condition and evidentially well stewarded.

4.37 Scenic Quality: Although the site is a settlement edge site, its intrinsic site features incorporating

its distinctive localised rolling landform, mature trees and well trimmed field hedgerows presents a



fpcr

16

rural scene, which when combined with the wooded backdrop of Kinver Edge escarpment, portray

a medium scenic quality

4.38 Rarity and Representativeness: The site and its immediate context are not rare and are typical of

settlement edge in the locality.

4.39 Conservation Interest: The site’s immediate context does not contain features of particular

conservation value. Kinver camp and Holly Austin Rock House are beyond the immediate site

context.

4.40 Recreational Value: The Staffordshire Way public footpath traverses through the site along its

southern section and therefore enables access and enjoyment by the public. Other than the

footpath, the site is not used for recreational uses.

4.41 Perceptual Aspects and Associations: The site is not particularly wild or tranquil, which are the

perceptual aspects identified in GLVIA. No intrinsic cultural associations relating to the site are

known. It is accessible via a public footpath which connects to a wider right of way network. The

site is overlooked by visitors to Kinver Edge plateau and the Holly Austin Rock House.

4.42 In conclusion and having appraised the above factors it is judged that the site and the immediate

landscape is of medium landscape value.

Visual Baseline

4.43 A visual appraisal has been undertaken for the site. This has explored the nature of the existing

visual amenity of the area and sought to establish the approximate visibility of the site from

surrounding locations and receptors. A series of photo viewpoints have been selected which

support this analysis.

4.44 Photographs have been taken to illustrate a view from a specific vantage point, or to demonstrate

a representative view for those receptors that are moving through the landscape, e.g. rights of way

users. The photographs may demonstrate varying degrees of visibility and include both short and

long range views. The photographs were taken in January 2017 and seasonal differences have

been taken into account when determining the visual effects on these receptors.

Photo Viewpoints

4.45 An assessment of the likely visual effects of the proposed development upon surrounding receptors

is detailed in the subsequent section. Figure 5 details the location of the viewpoints and different

receptor types, and Figure 6 illustrates the Photo Viewpoints. They are briefly described below;

Viewpoint 1, 2 and 3: Short Range Views from White Hill

4.46 Viewpoint 1 is a glimpsed immediate view of the site from White Hill verge through the opening of

Potter’s Cross farm gate. The robust hedgerow is prominent in the foreground with the site’s open

pastoral land beyond, with residential development evident in the background at the base of the

rising wooded ridgeline of Kinver Edge. Viewpoint 2 is an open view across the site with gently

rolling landform commanding the foreground and an internal field enclosure dissecting the site

north-south. An abundance of mature hedgerow trees punctuate the hedgerow structure, with a

low voltage overhead transmission line providing a visual intrusion within the scene. Residential

housing relating to Windsor Crescent is evident in the middle distance along with a tract of land



fpcr

17

used as equine pasture to the higher terrain in the west. Redcliff Covert and the distinctive ridgeline

of Kinver Edge frame the background scene.

4.47 Viewpoint 3 is an open view looking across from the higher terrain along White Hill looking south

east towards the site and Kinver. The site’s main features comprising robust hedgerows, mature

hedgerow trees and undulating landform are all evident within the fore and middle grounds. The

western urban edge of Kinver is clearly apparent filtered beyond mature tree canopies. The

residential dwellings of Comber can be seen integrated within the rising wooded ridgeline of Kinver

which commands the skyline to the south east.

Viewpoint 4 and 5: Short Range Views from Staffordshire Way

4.48 Viewpoint 4 is an open view of the southern section of the site as viewed from the Staffordshire

Way public footpath traversing westwards from the urban context of Kinver. The site’s rolling

localised topography channels views along the direction of travel with views of the residential

development along White Hill contained, equine pasture can be seen along the higher terrain in

the west along with the woodland edge of Redcliff Covert forming the background and skyline.

4.49 Viewpoint 5 is also taken from along Staffordshire Way public footpath looking back towards Kinver.

The open pastoral land of the site is evident with the mature hedgerow trees and rolling topography

containing longer range views. Filtered views of residential housing associated with Windsor

Crescent are afforded through mature trees in the background, with the rising escarpment lying to

the south.

Viewpoint 6 and 7: Mid Range Views from Kinver Edge

4.50 Viewpoint 6 is taken from the National Trust Holly Austin Rock House looking northwards across

the site. The site is partially visible in the middleground, being mostly contained by intervening

vegetation of Redcliff Covert at the base of Kinver Edge. The central section of the site is visually

contained both by residential builtform associated with Windsor Crescent and associated garden

vegetation, as well as the site’s own mature hedgerow tree canopies. Existing residential

development to the north of White Hill forms a pronounced section of urban context surrounded by

a well wooded scene, with the rolling hills towards Enville forming the skyline beyond.

4.51 Viewpoint 7 is taken from the high vantage point along the plateau of Kinver Edge at approximately

150m AOD looking north. There are long ranging broad panoramic views across different regions,

with the settlement of Kinver abutting the base of the escarpment in the fore to middleground. The

site is clearly evident with its open pastoral land and mature hedgerow trees, surrounded by the

woodland of Redcliff Covert to the south and west and existing housing relating to west Kinver to

the north and east. The rolling and well wooded hills around Enville form sequential ridgelines in

the mid distance with more distant hills beyond extending to the skyline.

Viewpoint 8: Long Range Views from Sheepwalks Lane

4.52 This is a long range panoramic view from the high ground along Sheepwalks Lane looking across

the valley towards the settlement of Kinver and its distinctive escarpment. The view is

representative from the perimeter edge of Enville Hall RGP, whose boundary is formed by the rural

lane’s hedgerow. The foreground view comprises a valley depression with rolling landform

punctuated by hedgerow trees and field boundaries. Kinver Edge wooded ridgeline is dominant to

the middleground with longer distance views of rolling hillsides extending into the background



fpcr

18

culminating with the Clent Hills on the horizon. The western settlement edge of Kinver is just

discernible and the village is well integrated within a seemingly well wooded context.

Summary of Visual Baseline

4.53 The baseline analysis results in a number of reasoned conclusions which are summarised below:

The site has a well contained visual envelope due to surrounding topography, built form and

structural vegetation. The wooded Kinver Edge escarpment provides a mid-range visual

backdrop to the south and south west whilst longer distance views towards rolling hills are

evident on the horizon towards the north beyond the settlement roofscape.

From an elevated position along the western realms of West Hill looking back towards the

settlement, there are glimpses afforded of the Parish Church lying along the ridgeline to the

south east, these views being filtered through the mature trees within the site.

Receptors in the vicinity of the site include residential properties, road users and users of the

Staffordshire Way public rights of way.

Receptors within mid-range are visitors to Kinver Edge National Trust site, specifically from

those trails along the plateau which allows 360 degree panoramic views across the region and

also visitors of Holly Austin Rock House.

Long distance views are mostly contained by topography, builtform and woodland but would

most likely be from the higher ground in the north west around Enville.



fpcr

19

5.0 LANDSCAPE PROPOSALS

Introduction

5.1 The development proposals are not yet developed, but plans 1244-12 Rev A and Rev B and 1244

– 02 show how the development could take place. The existing landscape resource and the visual

receptors and amenity of the site have been considered by the planning and design process and

have informed the resultant scheme. The landscape components of the scheme are an important

integral part of the proposals.

Landscape Design and GI Objectives

5.2 The key landscape and GI proposals for the scheme are;

Public Open Space (POS) along both the northern edge with White Hill, and to the southern

section of the site acting as a buffer to Redcliff Covert and Kinver Edge and facilitating a green

corridor for Staffordshire Way. The White Hill POS will provide a development set back to the

residents along White Hill and facilitate mid-range views over towards Kinver Edge helping to

retain the distinctive skyline.

A centrally located Community Green which will provide a neighbourhood pocket park and local

play amenity. It is recommended that this area of open space should be carefully considered in

the detailed design stage in order to accommodate the distinctive localised topography together

with the existing hedgerow structures and mature hedgerow trees.

Mitigate for the loss of any hedgerow, particularly along the site’s northern boundary with White

Hill to accommodate safe vehicular access, through new hedgerow re-alignment and amenity

planting within the POS.

The provision of POS, play and habitat related proposals.

The retention and enhancement of the site’s many mature hedgerow trees and hedgerow

structures.

The provision of robust site boundary vegetation to provide a landscape buffer between existing

neighbouring residential development.

A comprehensive network of tree planting across the site particularly along the primary streets,

public open space and individual plots.

Landscape Management

5.3 All of the landscape areas and public open space features will be managed and maintained. This

would be achieved through the implementation of a comprehensive Landscape Management Plan

(LMP), to ensure the successful establishment and continued thriving of the landscape proposals.



fpcr

20

6.0 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL EFFECTS

6.1 The following section outlines the likely landscape and visual effects that would arise from

proposed development on the site. Schedules detailing these likely landscape and visual effects

for the receptors are included in Appendices B and C respectively. Please refer to these in

conjunction with the following descriptions.

Landscape Effects

Construction

6.2 The location and design of temporary site compounds, lighting, signage and perimeter screen

fencing, combined with effective project management would seek to ensure that potential

landscape effects are mitigated and minimised during the construction phase. It is anticipated that

the construction working methods would adopt best practices wherever practicable and be agreed

with the Local Planning Authorities and Statutory Bodies where necessary.

6.3 During construction, there would be some short term adverse landscape effects, resulting from the

construction work. None of these effects would be greater than the effects arising through the

operational phase of the development as described below.

Operation (following Completion)

6.4 At a national level the site lies well within the boundaries of NCA 66 ‘Mid Severn Sandstone

Plateau’. The NCA covers an extensive area of landscape and there will be localised variations in

landscape sensitivity. The proposed development would not result in any discernible change to

landscape character at this broad geographical scale and therefore has negligible effects on the

NCA as a whole both at completion and year 10.

6.5 The site lies within the ‘Sandstone Estate Lands Regional Character Area’ (Planning for Landscape

Change 2001 SPG South Staffordshire Council). Whilst the characteristics of the site itself are

consistent with a number of the key characteristics of the wider character area in which it lies, it is

considered that the site is closely related to the existing urban fabric of Kinver, with residential

development present to the west, north and all along its eastern flank.

6.6 Development will lead to the loss of three pastoral fields and the introduction of new housing

elements within an existing settlement edge context, it effectively being an infill consolidation of an

existing development along White Hill.

6.7 It is proposed that the site’s intrinsic landscape features such as the site’s landform, hedgerow

boundaries and mature trees, will be retained and integrated within the new development. In

combination with proposed GI, including public open space and new tree planting, it is considered

the development will be readily integrated within the well wooded wider landscape character.

6.8 The regional level landscape receptor will be minimally changed and the scale of effect is deemed

to be negligible. Overall effects will be discernible to a localised area only lessening in time as

public open space proposals mature.

6.9 At sub-regional level the site lies within Land Cover Parcel ‘Kinver KV11’ of the South Staffordshire

Landscape Sensitivity Study. The Study makes a number of comments for any new development

to consider, namely protection of skyline views, respecting the site’s topography and other

landscape features, including accommodation of a green corridor for the Staffordshire Way public



fpcr

21

footpath. The proposed outline scheme attempts to sensitively address these issues, an iterative

design process which will continue through to the detailed design stage.

6.10 It is the intention where appropriate to retain the site’s existing landscape fabric to help ameliorate

the impact upon local landscape character.

6.11 It is recommended that the new development respects the views towards the wooded backdrop of

Kinver Edge, as seen from White Hill lane, and a generous development set back from the street

frontage is proposed to accommodate this. A substantial section of POS is also proposed for the

southern section of the site which will respect Redcliff Covert and the Staffordshire Way public

footpath corridor. It is recommended that the detailed design takes into account the distinctive

internal site features such as the localised landform, hedgerows and mature hedgerow trees.

6.12 The proposed GI for the site also incorporates enhanced site boundary structural vegetation and

proposed new street and plot trees, which upon maturation will provide a net benefit within the site,

helping the character of the new development to be integrated within an already well wooded

landscape context. Landscape effects would be moderate adverse at completion reducing to

moderate/minor adverse by year 10 as public open space matures helping to assimilate new

housing in to the receiving landscape.

Landscape Effects upon Designations

6.13 In regard to the Registered Park Enville Hall which is located 1km to the north west, the site is

effectively on the southern settlement edge of Kinver, and consequently more readily relates to the

existing urban fabric rather than a landscape which can be associated with the setting of this Park.

Builtform, structural vegetation and topography provide a significant disconnect between the

receptor and the site.

6.14 The National Trust managed estate of Kinver Edge incorporates the Iron Age Hillfort and

Toposcope along the plateau in addition to the geomorphic and heritage earth features of Holly

Austin Rock Houses and Nanny’s Rock. There are also a network of Woodland Walks and

Heathland Trails across the summit and lower slopes.

6.15 Panoramic views from the summit’s Toposcope are sweeping 360 degree long distance horizon

views encompassing five different counties and spanning the Black Country, The Cotswolds, The

Malverns, Clee Hills and Long Mynd.

6.16 Views of Kinver settlement are very much secondary and do not contribute to the panoramic

viewpoint as a visitor attraction. The urban character of this small town is clearly evident at the

base of the wooded ridgeline, nestling within a well wooded landscape scene. The localised

landscape character around the base of Kinver Edge is predominantly woodland and urban

context, the site comprising pastoral farmland.

6.17 The development of this open farm land to residential use will be evident but will not however

introduce any new or contrasting character close to Kinver Edge. The site will effectively be

consolidated as settlement edge abutting the wooded footslopes of Kinver ridgeline, as is already

the present situation.



fpcr

22

Visual Effects

Visual Envelope

6.18 The site has a visual envelope which is restricted to the mid-range from most aspects due to a

combination of surrounding topography, built form and structural vegetation. The wooded Kinver

Edge escarpment provides a mid-range visual backdrop to the south and south west of the site.

Construction

6.19 During construction, there would be some short term adverse visual effects, resulting from the

construction work, and views to partially completed works and associated activity, particularly from

the public footpath that passes along the site’s southern section, Staffordshire Way, and for

residents along White Hill and Windsor Crescent.

6.20 The retention of vegetation around the site boundary will help to mitigate visual effects of activity

at lower levels. Where this is not possible, for example along White Hill where a section of

hedgerow is proposed to be removed to allow access, then mitigation measures could include the

careful location and design of hoarding, temporary site compounds, lighting, signage and perimeter

screen fencing, combined with effective project management. It is anticipated that the construction

working methods would adopt best practices wherever practicable and be agreed with the Local

Planning Authorities and Statutory Bodies where necessary.

6.21 Short term construction effects will be greatest for receptors in the immediate vicinity of the site

and from the high vantage point of Kinver Edge escarpment. None of these effects would be greater

than the effects arising through the operational phase of the development as described below.

Operation (following Completion)

6.22 The following provides a summary of the visual effects assessment included at Appendix C.

6.23 The effects on visual amenity vary depending on distance from the development, the existing views

and the degree of screening provided by topography, vegetation and existing builtform.

6.24 The distance between receptors and the site is important, as visual effects reduce with distance.

Within this appraisal receptors located within a short distance of the site are defined as being

located within 250m, while medium distance constitutes between 250m and 1km, and anything

beyond that is termed as long distance.

Residential Properties and Settlement (Ref A in Figure 5)

6.25 The nature of the views was determined from publicly accessible locations and so the nature of

views for specific properties cannot be described.

6.26 Viewpoints 1 & 3 have been considered as broadly representative of the views from residential

dwellings located along White Hill (approximately 15 dwellings).

6.27 Permanent views afforded from dwellings along the opposite side of the street will be primarily from

those rooms occupied during the daylight hours, which in most cases will be from ground floor

rooms.



fpcr

23

6.28 Views from these receptors will be partial, being ameliorated by intervening front garden vegetation

and then mostly truncated by the dense hedgerow structure forming the site’s northern perimeter.

6.29 First floor bedroom windows are likely to have more open views of the development but these

rooms are generally occupied less during the waking hours and therefore have reduced

significance.

6.30 In addition to this partial screening described above, the development set back forms an

approximate 50m buffer from the existing dwellings along White Hill (northern carriageway). It is

likely that only the upper elevations and roof lines of new dwellings will be discernible beyond the

hedgerow from these receptors, apart from at the site access. Both existing and proposed trees

within the POS will filter and soften views of the development roofline, with visual amelioration

increasing in the longer term.

6.31 It is likely that views of the backdrop of Kinver Edge will still be visible above the new development

roofscape.

6.32 Residential dwellings from Windsor Crescent (approximately 22 dwellings) will have views

overlooking the new built development within the two northernmost fields, whilst 10 dwellings will

overlook the undeveloped zone of Public Open Space to the southern section of the site.

6.33 For ground floor receptors, adjacent to the northern plots, views will be truncated by rear garden

boundaries and filtered by garden vegetation and trees.

6.34 Only views of upper elevations and roof lines of semi-detached dwellings will be afforded, with

gaps between houses allowing a depth of vision further into the site, where the retained mature

tree canopies in combination with proposed street and plot trees will serve to soften the new built

form.

6.35 The development proposals show a landscape buffer between the residential boundaries and the

development which in time will further assist in mitigating the visual effects of the new development.

Public Rights of Way Staffordshire Way (Ref B in Figure 5)

6.36 The views along the Staffordshire Way whilst traversing though the southern section of the site are

predominantly short range views within the site with views out of the site predominantly curtailed

by the well wooded base of Kinver Edge and the localised landform of the site’s topography

(Viewpoint 4).

6.37 Filtered views of the existing settlement edge of west Kinver associated with Windsor Crescent are

afforded though garden and field boundary vegetation (Viewpoint 5).

6.38 Generally, Redcliff Covert woodland edge, mature hedgerow trees and prominent localised

topography channel views along the direction of travel.

6.39 The route of the Staffordshire Way public footpath will be retained, traversing the southern section

of the site allocated as Public Open Space. The immediate visual experience along this footpath

will remain open and relatively unaltered, with housing beyond, which is the current experience.

Users of White Hill rural lane (Ref C in Figure 5)

6.40 There are short distance views of the site from the verge of White Hill with longer views to the

wooded Kinver Edge ridgeline.



fpcr

24

6.41 The proposed layout provides a development set back of approximately 30m from the White Hill

street frontage, allowing a buffer zone comprising public open space.

6.42 Views afforded to vehicular users will be predominantly truncated by the continuous hedgerow

boundary, with filtered and glimpsed views of new development afforded during the winter months

only (Viewpoint 2) and through the site access (Viewpoint 1).

6.43 Views afforded by pedestrian users looking across the trimmed hedgerow will be of a series of

semi-detached residential dwellings and woodland beyond. Existing mature and proposed trees

within the intervening POS will filter and soften these views to glimpsed and partial, this

ameliorating effect increasing in the long term. It is likely that the wooded backdrop of Kinver Edge

will be glimpsed through the gaps between dwellings and above the dwellings.

Visitors to National Trust Holly Austin Rock Houses (Ref D in Figure 5)

6.44 The foreground is dominated by Redcliff Covert along the footslopes of Kinver Edge. From this

high vantage point, the northern section of the site is partially visible with intervening vegetation

and builtform associated with Windsor Crescent containing further views of the site.

6.45 The site’s mature trees also filter views in the dormant season, and will provide further containment

during summer months. White Hill residential development and the western settlement edge of

Kinver is visible with the rolling landform of The Million woodland block and Enville Common

providing the background scene with distant hills on the horizon.

6.46 The development will only be partially visible with filtered views predominantly of the roofscape of

the northern most new dwellings, and Public Open Space visible beyond acting as development

setback along White Hill. The settlement edge of Kinver will be seen to extend slightly, but in a

location where the existing settlement edge is already closer to the viewpoint.

Visitors to National Trust Kinver Edge Viewpoint (Ref E in Figure 5)

6.47 From the high ground of the escarpment plateau there are sweeping panoramic long distance

views across the surrounding regional landscape through west-north-east.

6.48 The settlement of Kinver dominates the fore to middleground extending up to wooded base of

Kinver Edge. The well wooded ridgelines of Enville RGP lie to the north of Kinver with the distant

rolling landscape of north Staffordshire extending into the horizon.

6.49 The site is visible from this vantage point except for the section of land south of the public footpath,

which is proposed as Public Open Space.

6.50 Whilst the development would be visible, it would not introduce new elements or bring development

closer to the edge.

Users of Sheepwalks Lane (Ref F in Figure 5)

6.51 There are long range panoramic views theoretically possible from high ground to the north west of

the site.

6.52 Within Viewpoint 8 the foreground view comprises a valley depression with rolling landform

punctuated by hedgerow trees and field boundaries. Kinver Edge wooded ridgeline is dominant to

the middle ground with longer distance views of rolling hillsides extending into the background

culminating with the Clent Hills on the horizon. Views of the western settlement edge of Kinver are



fpcr

25

well contained by woodland blocks. The settlement edge of White Hill is just discernible on the

footslopes of Kinver Edge,’ sandwiched’ between a coniferous plantation and the broadleaf

woodland Redcliff Covert. Long distance views of the site are contained by intervening topography,

structural vegetation and built form.

Night – time Visual Effects

6.53 The proposed site is located in an area with existing built development including lighting on three

sides. It is not expected that any night time impacts would exceed those experienced with day time

effects.



fpcr

26

7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

7.1 The site is located on land south of White Hill, and comprises three pastoral fields with existing

development to the north, east and west. The site itself comprises three medium scale pastoral

regular shaped fields intersected by a robust structure of hedgerow, with some lost sections infilled

with timber rail agricultural fencing.

7.2 The site has a distinctive localised landform which is characteristic of the surrounding landscape

context, this character being clearly evident and pronounced from both White Hill and along the

public footpath Staffordshire Way. Another intrinsic feature of the site are the number of mature

hedgerow trees prevailing along the field enclosures imparting a strong contribution to the site

character.

7.3 Three indicative layouts have been prepared, one for 30 dwellings (Sketch Appraisal 1244-12 Rev

B), one for 57 dwellings (Sketch Appraisal 1244-12 Rev A) and a larger scheme of approximately

100 dwellings on 1244 - 02 with accompanying green infrastructure of public open spaces and

structural planting.

Landscape Effects

7.4 During construction there would be some short term adverse landscape effects, resulting from the

construction work. None of these effects would be greater than the effects arising through the

operational phase of the development.

7.5 The site has been assessed as having a landscape sensitivity of medium.

7.6 At a national scale, landscape effects during the operational phases of development will be no

greater than negligible at completion and year 10.

7.7 At a regional scale the significance of effect is considered to be minor adverse falling to negligible

in year 10.

7.8 At a local district level, landscape effects will be moderate adverse upon completion reducing to

minor adverse in year 10.

7.9 The development would lead to the loss of pastoral farmland to residential use resulting in a

medium/high degree of change for the site and its immediate context overall. However, housing is

already an evident characteristic of the site’s immediate context and as such effects are deemed

to be moderate adverse at completion. Effects would lessen by year 10 to moderate/minor adverse

as structural planting within public open space matures to further integrate the new housing in to

the landscape.

Visual Effects

7.10 The site has a visual envelope which is restricted to the mid-range from most aspects due to a

combination of surrounding topography, builtform and structural vegetation. The wooded Kinver

Edge escarpment provides a distinctive visual backdrop to the south and south west of the site.

7.11 During construction, there would be some short term adverse visual effects, resulting from the

construction work, and views to partially completed works and associated activity, particularly from

the public footpath that passes along the site’s southern section and for residents off White Hill and

Windsor Crescent.



fpcr

27

7.12 The site is well contained by a combination of surrounding topography, builtform and structural

vegetative structures, such that the site’s intervisibility is restricted to the short and mid-range

receptors.

7.13 Visual effects for residential receptors are limited to localised dwellings adjoining the site boundary

such as those on Windsor Crescent and along White Hill. The significance of effect is considered

to be moderate adverse falling to moderate/minor adverse in year 10, with both retained and

proposed green infrastructure helping the development to integrate well within its surroundings.

7.14 Transient users of White Hill rural lane will have glimpsed and partial views producing moderate

adverse significance of effect reducing to minor adverse in year 10.

7.15 Visual effects from public rights of way are restricted to a short stretch of Staffordshire Way which

traverses across the southern section of the site. The significance of effect is considered to be

moderate adverse falling to minor adverse in year 10.

7.16 Visual effects from the high ground of the National Trust receptor Kinver Edge are considered to

be moderate/minor adverse falling to minor/negligible adverse in year 10.

7.17 Theoretical long distance views from the higher ground to the northwest in and around Enville have

been tested during a site visit, however the site was found to be extremely well contained.

Comparison of Landscape and Visual Effects of Development Options

7.18 In terms of landscape effects, it is considered that the 30 dwelling option would introduce

development to the existing gap on White Hill, retaining a green frontage to the road. There would

be development in depth, not just alongside the road. The 57 house option would extend further

back into the site, taking more land out of agricultural use, but overall there would be little different

landscape or visual effects. The third option with approximately 100 dwellings, would result in a

greater proportion of the site being developed, up to the footpath. The northern side of the footpath

towards Kinver Edge towards Kinver Edge would remain open. From the higher ground of Kinver

Edge, all three development options will be perceived as a minor change within the landscape,

with houses infilling a small parcel of land, already surrounded by existing houses. Overall whilst

there would be an incremental increase in landscape effects resulting from each of the options with

an increased residential area, this would not be enough to result in any change to the overall level

of landscape or visual effects assessed.

Conclusion

7.19 The development proposals demonstrate a considered and sensitive approach towards the local

landscape character and will seek to retain the site’s existing landscape features where feasible

within the detail design process. The development will have limited effect on the wider landscape

character. In visual terms, notable effects would be limited to receptors that border the site. Views

from the higher ground of Kinver Edge, would change little in overall composition, and with no

detriment to the wider panoramic views.

7.20 It is considered that the application site and receiving environment have the capacity to

accommodate the proposals. The proposals will not result in significant harm to the landscape

character or visual environment. It is considered that the proposed development can be

successfully integrated in this location.

1:12,500 A3 RGL/IDR 13 February 2017

White Hill,Kinver

Trebor Development

scale drawn issue date

project

client

drawing / figure number rev

Figure 1 -

SITE LOCATION PLANdrawing title

N

fpcr

FPCR Environment and Design Ltd, Lockington Hall, Lockington, Derby, DE74 2RH t: 01509 672772 f: 01509 674565 e: [email protected] w: www.fpcr.co.uk masterplanning environmental assessment landscape design urban design ecology architecture arboriculture

7686- Fig 1 Site Location.indd

This drawing is the property of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd and is issued on the condition it is not reproduced, retained or disclosed to any unauthorised person, either wholly or in part without written consent of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd.

Ordnance Survey material - Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence Number: 100019980 (Centremapslive.com)

Site Boundary

500m 1000m

1:20,000 A3 RGL/IDR 14 February 2017

White Hill,Kinver

Trebor Development


project

client


Figure 2 -

LANDSCAPE CHARACTERdrawing title

N

fpcr


J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686- Fig 2 Landscape Character.indd



Site Boundary

Urban

Ancient Redlands Estateland

Sandstone Estateland

Kinver KV11: Medium Landscape Sensitivity

Staffordshire County Boundary

All of area shown lies within National Character Area 66: Mid Severn Sandstone Plateau

Landscape Sensitivity Plan 2017 update : South Staffordshire Council

Planning for Landscape Change SPG : Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent Structure Plan 1996-2011

500m 1000m

1:12,500 @ A3 RGL/IDR 14 February 2017

White Hill,Kinver

Trebor Development


project

client


Figure 3 -

TOPOGRAPHY PLANdrawing title

N

fpcr


J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686- Fig 3 Topography.indd



40m - 50m AOD

50m - 60m AOD

60m - 70m AOD

70m - 80m AOD

80m - 90m AOD

100m - 110m AOD

90m - 100m AOD

110m - 120m AOD

120m - 130m AOD

130m - 140m AOD

140m - 150m AOD

150m - 160m AOD

160m - 170m AOD

170m - 180m AOD

180 m - 190m AOD

190m - 200m AOD

200m - 210m AOD

Site Boundary

500m 1000m

NTS @ A3 RGL/IDR 13 February 2017

White Hill,Kinver

Trebor Development


project

client


Figure 4 -

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHdrawing title

N

fpcr


J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686- Fig 4 Aerial photograph.indd



Site Boundary

500m 1000m

1:12,500 @ A3 RGL/IDR 20 February 2017

White Hill,Kinver

Trebor Development


project

client


Figure 5 -

VISUAL APPRAISALdrawing title

N

fpcr


J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686- Fig 5 Visual Appraisal.indd



E

F

Site Boundary

Receptor (denoted with LVIA Reference)A

6

7

4

3

5

8

21

Viewpoint Location1

A

AB

D

C

500m 1000m

NTS @ A3scale drawn

project

client

drawing / figure number

Figure 6IDR 10 February 2017

White Hill,Kinver


issue date

rev

drawing title

PHOTO VIEWPOINTS 1 & 2

-

fpcr


J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686- Fig 6 Photo Viewpoints.indd


PHOTO VIEWPOINT 1: View from White Hill looking north west

PHOTO VIEWPOINT 2: View into the site from Potter’s Cross Farm gate

Residential dwellingsassociated with Windsor Crescent

Kinver Edge The Site

White HillResidential dwellingsassociated with White Hill

Agricultural building associated with Potter’s Cross Farm


Kinver Edge The Site Redcliff Covert Equine pasture adjacent tosite along western perimeter

Low voltage overhead lines traversing site

Mature trees punctuate hedgerow field boundaries

Gently rolling localised topography within site

NTS @ A3scale drawn

project

client



White Hill,Kinver


issue date

rev

drawing title


-

fpcr




PHOTO VIEWPOINT 4: View from Staffordshire Way public footpath looking north west

PHOTO VIEWPOINT 3: View from White Hill looking south east

Redcliff Covert Equine pasture adjacent tosite along western perimeter

Low voltage overhead lines traversing site


Gently rolling localised topography within site

Staffordshire Way public footpath traversing site

Residential dwellingsassociated with Jenks Avenue

Kinver Edge Redcliff CovertCharacter of site defined by mature trees, hedgerows & rolling landform

Holly Austin RockThe Site

White Hill

Windsor Crescent

Comber

The Site

NTS @ A3scale drawn

project

client



White Hill,Kinver


issue date

rev

drawing title


-

fpcr




PHOTO VIEWPOINT 6: View from Holly Austin Rock Cottages, Kinver Edge

PHOTO VIEWPOINT 5: View from Staffordshire Way public footpath looking south east

Vegetation associated with Holly Austin Rock

Approximate Site Extents

Redcliff Covert Residential dwellings associated with western settlement edge of Kinver

White Hill


Foot slopes of Kinver EdgeThe SiteGently rolling localised topography within site

Staffordshire Way public footpath traversing site


NTS @ A3scale drawn

project

client



White Hill,Kinver


issue date

rev

drawing title


-

fpcr




PHOTO VIEWPOINT 7: View from summit of Kinver Edge looking north

PHOTO VIEWPOINT 8: View from Sheepwalks Lane looking south east

Redcliff CovertFoot slopes of Kinver Edge

Approximate Site Extents

White Hill Residential dwellings associated with western settlement edge of Kinver

Long distance views of site contained by intervening vegetation & builtform

Kinver Edge

Redcliff Covert

Whie Hill settlement edge

Farmland east of Rocky Wall lane

Appendix A Landscape and Visual Appraisal – Methodology and Assessment

Criteria

Introduction

The methodology for the landscape and visual appraisal undertaken for the proposed development is detailed in the appraisal report. The following information should be read in conjunction with this methodology.

As advised in the Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (3rd Edition) (GLVIA3), the judgements made in respect of both landscape and visual effects are a combination of an assessment of the sensitivity of the receptor and the magnitude of the landscape or visual effect. The following details the definitions and criteria used in assessing sensitivity and magnitude for landscape and visual receptors.

Where it is determined that the assessment falls between or encompasses two of the defined criteria terms, then the judgement will be described as High/ Medium or Minor/ Moderate etc. This indicates that the receptor is assessed to lie between the respective definitions or to encompass aspects of both.

Landscape

Landscape Sensitivity

Landscape receptors are assessed in terms of their ‘Landscape Sensitivity’. This combines judgements on the value to be attached to the landscape and the susceptibility to change of the landscape from the type of change or development proposed. The definition and criteria adopted for these contributory factors is detailed below.

There can be complex relationships between the value attached to landscape receptors and their susceptibility to change which can be especially important when considering change within or close to designated landscapes. For example an internationally, nationally or locally valued landscape does not automatically or by definition have a high susceptibility to all types of change. The type of change or development proposed may not compromise the specific basis for the value attached to the landscape.

Landscape Value

Value can apply to a landscape area as a whole, or to the individual elements, features and aesthetic or perceptual dimensions which contribute to the character of the landscape. The following criteria have been used to categorise landscape value. Where there is no clear existing evidence on landscape value, an assessment is made based on the criteria/ factors identified below (based on the guidance in GLVIA3 Box 5.1 Page 84).

Landscape quality (condition)

Scenic quality

Rarity

Representativeness

Conservation interest

Recreation value

Perceptual aspects

Associations

Landscape

Value

Definition

High Landscape receptors of high importance based upon factors of quality, rarity,

representativeness, conservation interest, recreational value, perceptual qualities and

associations. Limited potential for substitution.

Medium Landscape receptors of medium importance based upon factors of quality, rarity,


associations.

Capable of substitution.

Low

Landscape receptors of low importance based upon factors of quality, rarity,


associations.

Potential for landscape improvement and creation.

Landscape Susceptibility to Change

This means the ability of the landscape receptor (overall character type/ area or individual element/ feature) to accommodate the proposed development without undue consequences for the maintenance of the baseline position and/ or the achievement of landscape planning policies and strategies. The definition and criteria for the assessment of Landscape Susceptibility to Change is as follows:

Landscape

Susceptibility to

Change

Definition

High A highly distinctive and cohesive landscape receptor, with positive characteristics and

features and no or very few detracting or intrusive elements. Landscape features

intact and in very good condition and/ or rare. Limited capacity to accept the type of

change/ development proposed.

Medium Distinctive and more commonplace landscape receptor, with some positive

characteristics/ features and some detracting or intrusive elements. Landscape

features in moderate condition. Capacity to accept well planned and designed

change/ development of the type proposed.

Low

Landscape receptor of mixed character with a lack of coherence and including

detracting or intrusive elements. Landscape features that may be in poor or improving

condition and few that could not be replaced.

Greater capacity to accept the type of change/ development proposed.

Magnitude of Landscape Effects

The magnitude of landscape effects is the degree of change to the landscape receptor in terms of its size or scale of change, the geographical extent of the area influenced and its duration and reversibility. The table below sets out the categories and criteria adopted in respect of the separate considerations of Scale or Size of the Degree of Change and Reversibility. The geographical extent and duration of change are described where relevant in the appraisal.

Scale or Size of the Degree of Landscape Change

Scale or Size of the

Degree of

Landscape Change

Definition

High Total loss of or major alteration to key characteristics / features and the

introduction of new elements totally uncharacteristic to the receiving landscape.

Overall landscape receptor will be fundamentally changed.

Medium Partial loss of or alteration to one or more key characteristics / features and the

introduction of new elements that would be evident but not necessarily

uncharacteristic to the receiving landscape. Overall landscape receptor will be

obviously changed.

Low

Limited loss of, or alteration to one or more key characteristics/ features and the

introduction of new elements evident and/ or characteristic to the receiving

landscape. Overall landscape receptor will be perceptibly changed.

Negligible

Very minor alteration to one or more key characteristics/ features and the

introduction of new elements characteristic to the receiving landscape. Overall

landscape receptor will be minimally changed.

None

No loss or alteration to the key characteristics/ features, representing ‘no change’.

Reversibility

Reversibility

Definition

Irreversible The development would be permanent and the site could not be

returned to its current/ former use.

Reversible The development could be deconstructed/ demolished and the site could be

returned to broadly its current/ historic use (although that may be subject to

qualification depending on the nature of the development).

Visual

Sensitivity of Visual Receptors

Visual sensitivity assesses each visual receptor in terms of their susceptibility to change in views and visual amenity and also the value attached to particular views. The definition and criteria adopted for these contributory factors is detailed below.

Visual Susceptibility to Change

The susceptibility of different visual receptors to changes in views and visual amenity is mainly a function of; firstly, the occupation or activity of people experiencing the view at particular locations; and secondly, the extent to which their attention or interest may therefore be focussed on the views and visual amenity they experience.

Visual

Susceptibility to

Change

Definition

High Residents at home with primary views from ground floor/garden and upper floors.

Public rights of way and footpaths where attention is focussed on the landscape and

on particular views.

Visitors to heritage assets or other attractions whose attention or interest is likely to be

focussed on the landscape and/ or on particular views.

Communities where views make an important contribution to the landscape setting

enjoyed by residents.

Travellers on recognised scenic routes.

Medium Residents at home with secondary views (primarily from first floor level). Public rights of way and footpaths where attention is not focussed on the landscape

and/ or particular views.

Travellers on road, rail or other transport with a focus on the landscape.

Low

Users of outdoor recreational facilities where the view is less important to the activities (e.g. sports pitches). Travellers on road, rail or other transport where views are primarily focussed on the transport route. People at their place of work where views of the landscape are not important to the quality of the working life.

Value of Views

The value attached to a view takes account of any recognition attached to a particular view and/ or any indicators of the value attached to views, for example through guidebooks or defined viewpoints or references in literature or art.

Value of Views

Definition

High A unique or identified view (eg. shown as such on Ordnance Survey map, guidebook

or tourist map) or one noted in literature or art. A view where a heritage asset makes

an important contribution to the view.

Medium A typical and/ or representative view from a particular receptor.

Low

An undistinguished or unremarkable view from a particular receptor.

Magnitude of Visual Effects

Magnitude of Visual Effects evaluates each of the visual effects in terms of its size or scale, the geographical extent of the area influenced and its duration and reversibility. The table below sets out the categories and criteria adopted in respect of the Scale or Size (including the degree of contrast) of Visual Change. The distance and nature of the view and whether the view will be permanent or transient are also detailed in the Visual Effects Table.

Scale or Size of the

Degree of Visual

Change

Definition

High The proposal will result in a large and immediately apparent change in the view,

being a dominant and new and/ or incongruous feature in the landscape.

Medium The proposal will result in an obvious and recognisable change in the view and

will be readily noticed by the viewer.

Low The proposal will constitute a minor component of the wider view or a more

recognisable component that reflects those apparent in the existing view.

Awareness of the proposals will not have a marked effect on the overall nature of

the view.

Negligible/ None

Only a very small part of the proposal will be discernible and it will have very little

or no effect on the nature of the view.

Level of Effect

The final conclusions on effects, whether adverse or beneficial, are drawn from the separate judgements on the sensitivity of the receptors and the magnitude of the effects. This overall judgement involves a reasoned professional overview of the individual judgements against the criteria, to then make the overall judgement.

Whilst GLVIA3 notes at paragraph 5.56 that there are no hard and fast rules about the level of effects, the criteria adopted for this landscape and visual appraisal are defined as follows:

Major: An effect that will fundamentally change and be in direct contrast to the existing landscape or views;

Moderate: An effect that will markedly change the existing landscape or views but may retain or incorporate some characteristics/ features currently present;

Minor: An effect that will entail limited or localised change to the existing landscape/ views or will entail more noticeable localised change but including both adverse and beneficial effects and is likely to retain or incorporate some characteristics/ features currently present;

Negligible: An effect that will be discernible yet of very limited change to the existing landscape or views.

White Hills, Kinver – Landscape and Visual Appraisal: Landscape Effects Table

fpcrAPPENDIX B: LANDSCAPE EFFECTS TABLE (LET)

Landscape Receptor and Reference

Judged Sensitivity of Landscape

Judged Magnitude of Landscape Effect

Description/ Notes Overall Effect at Construction Phase

Overall Effect upon Completion

Overall Effect at 10 Years post Completion

Susceptibility to Change

Landscape Value

Scale or Size of the Degree of Change including degree of contrast/integration) at Stages of Project

Where applicable, are the Effects Reversible?

Major Moderate Minor Negligible None



High Medium Low

High Medium Low

High Medium Low Negligible None

Yes No N/A

Adverse Beneficial

Adverse Beneficial

Adverse Beneficial

National Landscape Character

Natural England, National

Character Area Profile

(NCA) 66 ‘Mid Severn

Sandstone Plateau’

Medium Medium Negligible No The site lies well within the boundaries of the Natural England's National Character Area (NCA) 66

‘Mid Severn Sandstone Plateau.

The profile notes: ‘Extensive sandstone plateau in the core and east of the NCA underpins an

undulating landscape with tree-lined ridges; this contrasts with the irregular topography and steep,

wooded gorges of the Severn Valley in the west.’

The NCA covers an extensive area of landscape and there will be localised variations in landscape

sensitivity. The proposed development would not result in any discernible change to landscape

character at this broad geographical scale.

However, the proposed development represents an opportunity to contribute to Statement of

Environmental Opportunity 1 by protecting, expanding and appropriately managing the

characteristic habitats of the NCA, specifically lowland heathland, acid grasslands and woodland

including orchards and hedgerows.

Negligible Negligible Negligible










Landscape Value






High Medium Low

High Medium Low


Yes No N/A

Adverse Beneficial

Adverse Beneficial

Adverse Beneficial

Landscape Character Assessment (LCA): County/District

Planning for Landscape Change SPG 2001

(Staffordshire County Council)

‘Sandstone Estatelands Regional Character Area’

Medium

Medium Negligible No Whilst the characteristics of the site itself are consistent with a number of the key characteristics of

the wider character area in which it lies, it is considered that the site is closely related to the existing

urban fabric of Kinver, with residential development present to the west, north and all along its

eastern flank.

Development will lead to the loss of three pastoral fields and the introduction of new housing

elements within an existing settlement edge context, it effectively being an infill consolidation of an

existing development along White Hill.

It is proposed that the site’s intrinsic landscape features such as the site’s landform, hedgerow

boundaries and mature trees, will be retained and integrated within the new development. In

combination with proposed GI, including public open space and new tree planting, it is considered

the development will be readily integrated within the well wooded wider landscape character.

The regional level landscape receptor will be minimally changed and the scale of effect is deemed

to be negligible. Overall effects will be discernible to a localised area only and are therefore Minor

lessening in time as public open space proposals mature with planting of local provenance as

recommended in the guidance.

Minor adverse

Minor

adverse

Negligible

adverse










Landscape Value






High Medium Low

High Medium Low


Yes No N/A

Adverse Beneficial

Adverse Beneficial

Adverse Beneficial

South Staffordshire

Landscape Sensitivity Study

Update 2017

South Staffordshire Council

‘Kinver KV11’

Medium Medium Medium / High No The Study describes the site as ‘subject to significant urban influences and is completely contained

by built form on the northern and eastern boundaries with further built form along part of the western

boundary’ and that ‘[the site] has visual appeal and there are views to the south to a wooded

backdrop. The hedgerow between the two fields in the northern part of the LCP is a significant

feature as are its hedgerow trees.’

The Study comments that ‘Any development would need to be located in the western part of the site

to protect skyline and to follow the topography of the LCP. The PRoW (Staffordshire Way) would

need sufficient stand-off from development and could form the basis for on-site open space

provision. This would also create a buffer area between any development and Redcliff Covert.’

It is the intention where appropriate to retain the site’s existing landscape fabric to help ameliorate

the impact upon local landscape character.

It is recommended that the new development respects the views towards the wooded backdrop of

Kinver Edge, as seen from White Hill lane, and a generous development set back from the street

frontage is proposed to accommodate this. A substantial section of POS is also proposed for the

southern section of the site which will respect Redcliff Covert and the Staffordshire Way public

footpath corridor. It is recommended that the detailed design layouts takes into account the

distinctive internal site features such as the localised landform, hedgerows and mature hedgerow

trees.

The proposed GI for the site also incorporates enhanced site boundary structural vegetation and

proposed new street and plot trees, which upon maturation will provide a net benefit within the site,

helping the character of the new development to be integrated within an already well wooded

landscape context.

Major/moderate adverse

Moderate

adverse

Minor

adverse

Setting of Enville Hall, RGP High Medium Negligible/None No The RGP Enville Hall is 1km to the north west of the site at its closet point. The site is effectively on

the southern settlement edge of Kinver, and consequently more readily relates to the existing urban

fabric rather than a landscape which can be associated with the setting of this RGP. Built form,

structural vegetation and topography provide a significant disconnect between the receptor and the

site, resulting in a negligible effect upon the setting of this heritage landscape.

Negligible/None

Negligible/None

Negligible /

None










Landscape Value






High Medium Low

High Medium Low


Yes No N/A

Adverse Beneficial

Adverse Beneficial

Adverse Beneficial

Kinver Edge National Trust

Managed Estate

High Medium/High Negligible No The National Trust managed estate of Kinver Edge incorporates the Iron Age Hillfort and Toposcope

along the plateau in addition to the geomorphic and heritage earth features of Holly Austin Rock

Houses and Nanny’s Rock. There are also a network of Woodland Walks and Heathland Trails

across the summit and lower slopes.

Panoramic views from the Toposcope are sweeping 360 degree long distance horizon views

encompassing five different counties and spanning the Black Country, The Cotswolds, The

Malverns, Clee Hills and Long Mynd.

Views of Kinver settlement are very much secondary and do not contribute to the panoramic

viewpoint as a visitor attraction. The urban character of this small town is clearly evident at the base

of the wooded ridgeline, and as such contributes to the setting of Kinver Edge albeit in a subordinate

manner nestling within a well wooded landscape scene. The localised landscape character around

the base of Kinver Edge is predominantly woodland and urban context, the site comprising pastoral

farmland.

The development of this open farm land to residential use will be evident but will not however

introduce any new or contrasting character to the setting of Kinver Edge. The site will effectively be

consolidated as settlement edge abutting the wooded footslopes of Kinver ridgeline, as is already

the present situation.

As such the development is considered to have a minor/negligible impact upon the National Trust

Kinver Edge site, it forming a small component which is not untypical for the existing context.

Furthermore, the extensive panoramic views will not be affected. In the longer term the new

development will become integrated within the setting of Kinver Edge.

Minor

adverse

Minor/ Negligible

adverse

Negligible

adverse

Landscape Character: Site and Immediate Context










Landscape Value






High Medium Low

High Medium Low


Yes No N/A

Adverse Beneficial

Adverse Beneficial

Adverse Beneficial

Site and Immediate Context Medium

Medium Medium / High No The development of the open pastoral farmland for residential use will clearly have an impact on the

site and the immediate context. The nature of the development proposals in particular scale and

density will respect the prevailing local urban character. The development proposals will provide two

undeveloped zones to soften the edge transition between the rural lane of White Hill to the north

and indeed a larger area of Public Open Space to the southern section of the site adjacent the

wooded footslopes of Kinver Edge, this undeveloped zone also respecting the public footpath

corridor of Staffordshire Way.

Additionally there will be an area of POS within the site proposed as a Community Green, within this

area it is recommended that the localised rolling landform of the site together with existing

hedgerows and mature trees will be retained, thereby preserving the most valued characteristics of

the farmland landscape character. The proposed GI for the site also incorporates enhanced site

boundary structural vegetation and proposed new street and plot trees, which upon maturation will

provide a net benefit within the site.

With regard to the site’s immediate context, the new development will not be introducing a new or

contrasting landscape character, since existing residential already exerts an urbanising influences

upon the site.

Major/ moderate

adverse

Moderate

adverse

Moderate /

Minor

adverse

White Hill, Kinver – Landscape and Visual Appraisal: Visual Effects Table

1

fpcr APPENDIX C: VISUAL EFFECTS TABLE (VET)

Ref Receptor Type and Location

(including approx no. of dwellings where applicable)

Judged Sensitivity of Visual Receptor

Judged Magnitude of Visual Effects Description/ Notes Overall Effect at Construction Phase


Overall Effect 10 Years post Completion


Value

Distance from Site Boundary (or Built Development where stated) (approx. m/km)

Nature of View

Is the View Permanent or Transient?

Size/Scale of Visual Effect (incl. degree of contrast/ integration) (at Stages of Project)

Major Moderate Minor Negligible None Adverse or Beneficial



High Medium Low

High Medium Low

Full Partial Glimpse None

HighMedium Low Negligible/ None

A

Residential dwellings along White Hill (approximately 15 dwellings) and Windsor Crescent (approximately 22 dwellings)

High Medium 50m from built development

Partial Permanent Construction: High

Completion:

High/medium

Year 10: Medium

The nature of the views was determined from publically accessible locations and so the nature of views for specific properties cannot be described.

Viewpoints 1 & 3 have been considered as broadly representative of the views from residential dwellings located along White Hill.

Permanent views afforded from dwellings along the opposite side of the street will be primarily from those rooms occupied during the daylight hours, which in most cases will be from ground floor rooms.

Views from these receptors will be partial, being ameliorated by intervening front garden vegetation and then mostly truncated by the dense hedgerow structure forming the site’s northern perimeter.

In addition to this partial screening, the development set back forms an approximate 50m buffer from the existing dwellings along White Hill (northern carriageway). It is likely that only the upper elevations and roof lines of new dwellings will be discernible beyond the hedgerow from these receptors. Both existing and proposed trees within the POS will filter and soften views of the development roofline, with visual amelioration increasing in the longer term.

It is likely that views of the backdrop of Kinver Edge will still be visible above the new development roofscape.

Residential dwellings from Windsor Crescent will have views overlooking the new built development within the two northernmost fields, whilst 10 dwellings will overlook the Public Open Space to the southern section of the site.

For ground floor receptors adjacent to the northern plots, views will be truncated by rear garden boundaries and filtered by garden vegetation and trees.

Only views of upper elevations and roof lines of semi-detached dwellings will be afforded, with gaps between units allowing a depth of vision further into the site, where the retained mature tree canopies in combination with proposed street and plot trees will serve to soften the new builtform.

The development proposals show a landscape buffer between the residential boundaries and the development which in time will further assist in mitigating the visual effects of the new development.

Major / moderate adverse

Moderate adverse

Moderate/ minor adverse

B Users of Public Footpath Staffordshire Way

High Medium Internal site view Partial Transient Construction:

High/medium

Completion: Medium

Year 10: Medium/Low

Experience along footpath is a medium scale field with views out of the site predominantly curtailed by the well wooded base of Kinver Edge and the localised rolling landform of the site’s topography (Viewpoint 4).

Filtered views of the existing settlement edge of west Kinver associated with Windsor Crescent are afforded though garden and field boundary vegetation (Viewpoint 5).

Generally mature hedgerow trees, Redcliff Covert woodland and the prominent localised landform channel views along the direction of travel.

The route of the Staffordshire Way public footpath will be retained, traversing through the southern section of the site allocated as Public Open Space. The immediate visual experience along this

Major/ moderate adverse

Moderate adverse

Minor adverse

White Hill, Kinver – Landscape and Visual Appraisal: Visual Effects Table

2

fpcrfootpath will remain open and relatively unaltered, with housing beyond, which is the current experience.

C

Users of White Hill, rural lane (pedestrian & vehicular) (67.5-75m AOD)

Medium Medium 0-3m Partial / Glimpsed

Transient Construction:

High/Medium

Completion:

High/Medium

Year 10: Medium

Short distance views of the site from the verge of White Hill with longer views to Kinver Edge providing a well wooded backdrop.

The proposed layout provides a development set back of approximately 30m from the White Hill street frontage, allowing a buffer zone comprising public open space.

Views afforded to vehicular users will be predominantly truncated by the continuous hedgerow boundary, with filtered and glimpsed views of new development afforded during the winter months only (Viewpoint 2) and through the site access.

Views afforded by pedestrian users looking across the trimmed hedgerow will be of a series of semi-detached residential dwellings and woodland beyond. Existing mature and proposed trees within the intervening POS will filter and soften these views to glimpsed and partial, this ameliorating effect increasing in the long term. It is likely that the wooded backdrop of Kinver Edge will be glimpsed through the gaps between dwellings, and above the dwellings.

Moderate adverse

Moderate adverse

Minor adverse

D

Visitors to National Trust site, Holly Austin Rock Houses

(105m AOD)

High Medium 300m Partial Permanent Construction:Medium/

low

Completion:

Medium/low

Year 10: Low

The foreground is dominated by Redcliff Covert along the footslopes of Kinver Edge. From this high vantage point, the northern section of the site is partially visible with intervening vegetation and builtform associated with Windsor Crescent containing further views of the site.

The site’s mature trees also filter views in the dormant season, and will provide further containment during summer months.

White Hill residential development and the western settlement edge of Kinver is visible with the rolling landform of The Million woodland block and Enville Common providing the background scene with distant hills on the horizon.

The development will only be partially visible with filtered views predominantly of the roofscape of the northern most new dwellings, and Public Open Space visible beyond acting as development setback along White Hill.

The settlement edge of Kinver will be seen to extend slightly, but in a location where the existing settlement edge is already closer to the viewpoint.

Moderate adverse

Moderate /minor adverse

Minor adverse

E

Visitors to National Trust site, Kinver Edge summit

(145m AOD)

High High 440m Full Permanent Construction:Medium/

Low

Completion: Low

Year 10:

Low/Negligible

Extensive sweeping panoramic long distance views across surrounding landscape through west-north-east.

Settlement of Kinver dominates fore to middle ground extending up to wooded base of Kinver Edge.

Well wooded ridgeline of The Million and Enville Common lie to the north of Kinver with distant rolling landscape of north Staffordshire extending into the horizon.

The site is visible from this vantage point except for the section of land south of the public footpath, which is proposed as Public Open Space.

Whilst the development would be visible, it would not introduce new elements or bring development closer to the edge.

Moderate adverse

Moderate/ minor adverse

Minor/ negligible adverse

F

Users of rural lane Sheepwalks Lane

(155-160m AOD)

Medium Medium 2.1Km None Transient Construction: None

Completion: None

Year 10: None

Long range panoramic view from high ground to the north west of the site.

Foreground view comprises a valley depression with rolling landform punctuated by hedgerow trees and field boundaries.

Kinver Edge wooded ridgeline is dominant to the middleground with longer distance views of rolling hillsides extending into the background culminating with the Clent Hills on the horizon.

Views of the western settlement edge of Kinver are well contained by woodland blocks.

The settlement edge of White Hill is just discernible on the footslopes of Kinver Edge,’ sandwiched’ between a coniferous plantation and broadleaf woodland Redcliff Covert.

Long distance views of the site are contained by intervening topography, structural vegetation and builtform.

None None None

Appendix D

Sketch Appraisal Plans (57 units) 1244-12 Rev A

Sketch Appraisal Plans (30 units) 1244-12 Rev B

Sketch Appraisal Masterplan (104 units) 1244-02

Rev B

Line of Footpath Retained

POTENTIAL FOOTPATH LINKSUBJECT TO DISCUSSIONSWITH NATIONAL TRUST

POTENTIAL NEW CIRCULAR FOOTPATHROUTE ON LAND OWNED BYSTAYLEY DEVELOPMENTS

Rev A

Line of Footpath Retained

POTENTIAL NEW CIRCULAR FOOTPATHROUTE ON LAND OWNED BYSTAYLEY DEVELOPMENTS

POTENTIAL FOOTPATH LINKSUBJECT TO DISCUSSIONSWITH NATIONAL TRUST

Rushall House, School Road, Brewood, Staffs, ST19 9DSt| 01902 851 641 f| 01902 851642

e| [email protected]| www.krtassociates.co.uk

Kevin R.Twigger & Associates Ltd

ARCHITECTURAL CIVIL ENGINEERINGLAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE DESIGN

1244-02

1:500@A0 MAY 2014

DEVELOPMENT OFFWHITE HILL, KINVER

SKETCH APPRAISAL

DO NOT SCALE FROM DRAWING. MINOR INACCURACIES MAY OCCURDUE TO PRINTING PROCESSES. ALL WRITTEN / SCALED DIMENSIONS &FLOOR AREAS ARE SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION BY CONTRACTOR(S) ONSITE.

THIS DRAWING, DESIGN & BUILDING WORKS DEPICTED ARE THE ©COPYRIGHT OF KEVIN R. TWIGGER ASSOCIATES LTD & MAY NOT BEAMENDED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. NOLIABILITY WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR AMENDMENTS OR ALTERATIONSMADE BY OTHERS.

TREBORDEVELOPMENTS

Innovation Centre, Longbridge Technology Park,1 Devon Way, Birmingham, B31 2TS

t| 08455 276 981 f| 0121 222 5481 e| [email protected]

w| www.trebordevelopments.co.uk

0m 10m 20m 30m 40m 50m

METRESSCALE BAR - 1:500