30
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA M iam i Division M DL No. 2599 M asterFileNo.15-02599-M D-M ORENO 14-24009-CV-M O RENO IN RE: TAKATA AIRBAG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION THIS DOCUM ENT RELATES TO ALL ECONOMIC LOSS ACTIONS AGAINST TOYOTA DEFENDANTS / FINAL ORDER APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT AND CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Omnibus M otion for Final Approval ofClass Settlementsand Certification ofSettlement Classes, and Application forClass Representative Service Awards and ClassCounsel'sAttorney'sFees (D.E.2033),ûled on Septem ber8. 2017. THE COURT hasconsidered themotion,the supporting memoranda,objections,and responsesto objections,and otherpertinentportionsofthe record,including the Settlement Agreementbetween ClassRepresentativesand the Toyota Defendants(D.E.1724-4),and the OrderPreliminarily ApprovingClassSettlementand Certifying SettlementClmss(D.E.1799). Having held a FairnessHearing on October25,2017,and being otherwise fully advisedin the premises, itis ADJUDG ED that them otion isGRANTED asfollows: This Final Order Approving Class Settlement incomorates the Settlement Agreement and itsexhibits, and thePreliminary ApprovalOrder. Unlessotherwiseprovided, the Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 13

Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

M iam i Division

M DL No. 2599

M aster File No. 15-02599-M D-M ORENO

14-24009-CV-M O RENO

IN RE:

TAKATA AIRBAG PRODUCTSLIABILITY LITIGATION

THIS DOCUM ENT RELATES TO

ALL ECONOM IC LOSS ACTION S

AGAINST TOYOTA DEFENDANTS/

FINAL ORDER APPROVING CLASS SETTLEM ENT ANDCERTIFYING SETTLEM ENT CLASS

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Omnibus M otion for Final

Approval of Class Settlements and Certification of Settlement Classes, and Application for Class

Representative Service Awards and ClassCounsel's Attorney's Fees (D.E. 2033), ûled on

Septem ber 8. 2017.

THE COURT has considered the motion, the supporting memoranda, objections, and

responses to objections, and other pertinent portions of the record, including the Settlement

Agreement between Class Representatives and the Toyota Defendants (D.E. 1724-4), and the

Order Preliminarily Approving Class Settlement and Certifying Settlement Clmss (D.E. 1799).

Having held a Fairness Hearing on October 25, 2017, and being otherwise fully advised in the

premises, it is

ADJUDG ED that the m otion is GRANTED as follows:

This Final Order Approving Class Settlement incomorates the Settlement

Agreement and its exhibits, and the Preliminary Approval Order. Unless otherwise provided, the

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 13

Page 2: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

terms defined in the Settlement Agreement and Preliminary Approval Order shall have the same

meanings for pumoses of this Final Order and the accompanying Final Judgment.

2. The Court has personal jurisdiction over all parties in the Action including a11

Class Members, and has subject matter jurisdiction over the Action, including jtlrisdiction to

approve the Settlement Agreement, grant final certification of the Class, settle and release al1

claims released in the Settlement Agreement, and dismiss with prejudice the economic loss

claims asserted against Toyota in the Action and enter final judgment with respect to Toyota in

the Action. Further, venue is proper in this Court.

1. TH E SETTLEM ENT CLASS

Based on the record before the Court, including a11 submissions in support of the

settlement, objections and responses, and al1 prior proceedings in the Action, as well as the

Settlement Agreement and its related documents and exhibits, the Court confirms the

certification of the following nationwide Class for settlement purposes only:

(1) a11 persons or entities who or which owned and/or leased, onthe date of the issuance of the Preliminary Approval Order, SubjectVehicles distributed for sale or lease in the United States or any of

its territories or possessions; and (2) a11 persons or entities who orwhich formerly owned and/or leased Subject Vehicles distributedfor sale or lease in the United States or any of its territories or

possessions, and who or which sold or returned, plzrsuant to a

lease, the Subject Vehicles after April 1 1, 2013 and through thedate of the issuance of the Preliminary Approval Order. Excluded

from this Class are: (a) Toyota, its officers, directors, employeesand outside counsel; its affiliates and affiliates' officers, directors

and employees; its distributors and distributors' oftkers, directorsand employees; and Toyota's Dealers and their officers and

directors; (b) Settlement Class Counsel, Plaintiffs' counsel, andtheir employees; (c) judicial officers and their immediate familymembers and associated court staff assigned to this cmse; (d)Automotive Recyclers and their outside counsel and employees;

and (e) persons or entities who or which timely and properlyexclude themselves from the Class.

2

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 2 of 13

Page 3: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

4. The Court finds that only those persons/entities/orgr izations listed in Appendix

B to this Final Order have timely and properly excluded themselves from the Class and,

therefore, are not bound by this Final Order or the accompanying Final Judgment.

The Court confirms, for settlement puposes and conditioned upon the occurrence

of the Effective Date, that the Class meets a11 the applicable requirements of Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 23(a) and (b)(3):

a. Numerosity. The Class, which is ascertainable, consists of more than 9

million members located throughout the United States and satisfies the numerosity requirement

of Federal Rule of Civil Procedtlre 23(a)(1). Joinder of these widely dispersed, numerous Class

Members into one suit would be impracticable.

b. Commonality. There are some questions of law or fact common to the

Class with regard to the alleged activities of Toyota in this case. These issues are sufficient to

establish commonality under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a)(2).

Typicality. The claims of class representatives are typical of the claims of

the Class M embers they seek to represent for purposes of settlement.

d. Adequate Representation. Plaintiffs' interests do not contlict with those of

absent members of the Class, and Plaintiffs' interests are co-extensive with those of absent Class

Members. Additionally, the Court recognizes the experience of Settlement Class Cotmsel.

Plaintiffs and their counsel have prosecuted this action vigorously on behalf of the Class. The

Court finds that the requirement of adequate representation of the Class has been fully met under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a)(4).

e. Predominance of Common Issues.The questions of 1aw or fact common

to the Class Members predominate over any questions affecting any individual Class M ember.

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 3 of 13

Page 4: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

f. Superiority ofthe Class Action Mechanism. The class action mechanism

provides a superior procedtlral vehicle for resolution of this matter compared to other available

altematives. Class certification promotes efficiency and uniformity of judgment because the

many Class M embers will not be forced to separately pursue claims or execute settlements in

various courts around the country.

6. The designated

Collins, Corene Quirk, Cynthia Wishkovsky, John Huebner, Lisa Peterson, Marc Raiken, Shelley

Shader, and Nelson Powell. The Court tsnds that these Class M embers have adequately

represented the Class for pumoses of entering into and implementing the Settlement Agreement.

class representatives are as follows'.Angela Ruffin, Connie

The Court appoints Peter Prieto of Podhtlrst Orseck, P.A. as Lead Settlement Class Cotmsel, and

David Boies of Boies, Schiller & Flexner, L.L.P.; Todd A. Smith of Power, Rogers and Smith,

L.L.P.; Roland Tellis of Baron & Budd, P.C.; James E. Cecchi of Carella, Byrne, Cecchi,

Olstein, Brody, & Agnello, PC; and Elizabeth J. Cabraser of Lieff Cabraser Heimnnn &

Bemstein, LLP as Settlement Class Cotmsel.

In making all of the foregoing findings, the Court has exercised its discretion in

certifying the Class.

II. NOTICE AND OUTREACH TO CLASS MEM BERS, AND QUALIFIEDSETTLEM ENT FUND

Based on the record, the Court finds that the Class Notice has been given to the8.

Class in the manner approved in the Preliminary Approval Order. The Class Notice: (i) is

reasonable and constitutes the best practicable notice to Class M embers under the circumstances;

(ii) constitutes notice that was reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise Class

M embers of the pendency of the Action and the terms of the Settlement Agreement, their right to

exclude themselves from the Class or to object to a11 or any part of the Settlement Agreement,

4

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 4 of 13

Page 5: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

their right to appear at the Fairness Hearing (either on their own or through counsel hired at their

own expense), and the binding effect of the orders and Final Order and Final Judgment in the

Action, whether favorable or unfavorable, on a1l persons and entities who or which do not

exclude themselves from the Class; (iii) constitutes due, adequate, and sufscient notice to a11

persons or entities entitled to receive notice; and (iv) fully satisfied the requirements of the

United States Constitution (including the Due Process Clause), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

23 and any other applicable 1aw as well as complying with the Federal Judicial Center's

illustrative class action notices.

9. The Court further finds that Toyota, through the Settlement Notice Administrator,

provided notice of the settlement to the appropriate state and federal government oftscials

plzrsuant to 28 U.S.C. j 1715.The Court has given the appropriate state and federal government

offcials the requisite 90-day period to comment or object to the Settlement Agreement before

entering its Final Order and Final Judgment.

10. The Parties' Settlement includes an Outreach Program by which a Settlement

Special Administrator will take additional actions to notify vehicle owners about the Takata

Airbag lnflator Recalls and to promptly remedy those issues. This Outreach Program includes:

(a) direct contact of Class Members via U.S. mail, landline and cellular telephone calls, social

media, email and texting; (b) contact of Class Members by third parties (e.g., independent repair

shops); and (c) multi-media campaigns, such as through print, television, radio, and internet.

Because this recall effort affects the health and safety of consllmers, the Court finds that it is in

the public interest and the federal govem ment's interest to begin this Outreach Progrnm as soon

as practicable, if not already begun, and that calls and texts made under the Outreach Program

are being made for emergency pumoses as that phrase is used in 47 U.S.C. j 227(b)(1)(A).

5

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 5 of 13

Page 6: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

Direct consumer contact through the Outreach Program is tmdertaken to convey important public

safety information to consumers. The Settlement Special Administrator and those working on

his behalf shall serve as agents of the federal government for these pumoses and shall be entitled

to any rights or privileges afforded to government agents or contractors in carrying out their

duties in this regard.

1 1. The Court finds that the Escrow Account is to be a çtqualified settlement fund'' as

defined in Section 1.468B-1(c) of the Treasury Regulations in that it satisfies each of the

following requirements:

(a)

and is subject to the continuing jurisdiction of this Court;

The Escrow Account is to be established pursuant to this Court's order,

(b) The Escrow Account is to be established to resolve or satisfy one or more

claims that have resulted or may result from an event that has occurred and that has given rise to

at least one claim asserting liabilities; and

(c) The assets of the Escrow Account are to be segregated from other assets of

Defendants, the transferor of the payment to the Settlement Ftmd, and controlled by an Escrow

Agreement.

12.

Treasury Regulations, the Court finds that Toyota may elect to treat the Escrow Accotmt as

coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow

Under the çlrelation back'' rule provided under Section 1.468B-1()(2)(i) of the

Account meets the requirements of Paragraphs 1 1(b) and 1 1(c) of this Order or January 1 of the

calendar year in which a1l of the requirements of Paragraph 1 1 of this Order are met. lf such a

relation-back election is m ade, the assets held by the Settlement Fund on such date shall be

treated as having been transferred to the Escrow Account on that date.

6

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 6 of 13

Page 7: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

111. FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEM ENT AGREEM ENT

13. The Court finds that the Settlement Agreement resulted from extensive arm's-

length, good-faith negotiations between Settlement Class Counsel and Toyota, through

experienced counsel.

14. Pursuant to Federal Court approves the

Settlement as set forth in the Settlement Agreement, and finds that the Settlement is fair,

reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interest of the Class and is in f'ull compliance with a1l

Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), the

applicable requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States Constitution

(including the Due Process Clause), the Class Action Fairness Act, and any other applicable law.

The Court declares that the Settlement Agreement is binding on al1 Class M embers, except those

identified on Appendix B, and it is to be preclusive in the Action. The decisions of the

Settlement Special Administrator relating to the review, processing, determination and payment

of Claims submitted pursuant to the Settlement Agreement are final and not appealable.

The Court finds that the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable and adequate

based on the following factors: (a) there is no fraud or collusion underlying the Settlement

Agreement; (b) the complexity, expense, uncertainty, and likely duration of litigation in the

Action favor settlement on behalf of the Class; and (c) the Settlement Agreement provides

meaningful benetks to the Class.

The Parties are directed to implement and consummate the Settlement according

to the terms and provisions of the Settlement Agreement. ln addition, the Parties are authorized

to agree to and adopt such nmendments and modifications to the Settlement Agreement as: (i)

shall be consistent in all material respects with this Final Order, and (ii) do not limit the rights of

the Class.

7

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 7 of 13

Page 8: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

17. The Court has considered all objections, timely and proper or otherwise, to the

Settlement Agreement, and denies and overrules them as without merit.

IV. SETTLEM ENT CLASS COUNSEL'S FEE APPLICATION AND INCENTIVEAW ARDS TO CLASS REPRESENTATIVES

18. Class Counsel has applied for a service award in the amount of $5,000 for each

Class Representative. Here, the Class Representatives clearly devoted considerable time and

resources to this Action. Specifcally, the Class Representatives maintained regular contact with

Class Cotmsel, responded to written discovery requests, and many appeared for depositions.

Thus, the Court approves the application of Service Awards of $5,000 for each Class

Representative, to be paid f'rom the common fund. Accordingly, Class Counsel's application for

Service Awards of $5,000 for each named Class Representatives is GRANTED.

19. Class Counsel has filed an application for attorneys' fees equal to 30 percent of

the $278,500,000 common fund created through their efforts in prosecuting and settling this

Action, totaling $83,550,000.

20. As recognized by the United States Supreme Court, the 1aw is well established

that $ta litigant or lawyer who recovers a common fund for the benefit of persons other than

himself or his client is entitled to a reasonable attorney's fee from the fund as a whole.'' Boeing

Co. v. Van Gemert, 444 U.S. 472, 478 (1980). The 1aw is equally well-established in the

Eleventh Circuit that lçlaqttorneys' fees awarded from a common fund shall be based upon a

reasonable percentage of the fund established for the benefk of the class.'' Camden I Condo.

Ass 'n v. Dunkle, 946 F.2d 768, 771 (11th Cir. 1991).

21. Per Camden 1, the nonexclusive list of factors the Court should consider in

determining the reasonableness of the attorneys' fees are as follows:

8

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 8 of 13

Page 9: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

(1) the time and labor required; (2) the novelty and difûculty of thequestions; (3) the skill required to perform the legal servicesproperly; (4) the precluslon of other employment; (5) thecustomary fee; (6) whether the fee is fixed or contingent; (7) thetime limitations imposed by the client or the circumstances; (8) theamount involved and the results obtained; (9) the experience,reputation, and ability of the attorneys; (10) the ttundesirability'' ofthe case; (1 1) the nattlre and length of the professional relationshipwith the client; and (12) awards in similar cases.

f#. at 772 n.3.

22. In support of their request for attorneys' fees equal to 30 percent of the common

fund, Class Counsel has presented the Declaration of Professor Brian Fitzpatrick, a leading

scholar on class actions, and the Declration of Peter Prieto, Esq., the Court-appointed Chair

Lead Counsel in this litigation. Both Declarations analyze each of the factors set forth in

Camden 1, and conclude that every applicable factor supports the reasonableness of the instant

fee request. This Court agrees. The Court independently has analyzed the Camden I factors

against the unique facts of this case and concludes that every applicable factor supports the

reasonableness of the instant fee request.

23. Further, two additional factors support the reasonableness of the requested fee.

First, as highlighted in the Declarations, the requested fee actually amounts to less than 30

percent of value of the common fund created through the settlement, due to the value of the

Customer Support Progrnm made available to all Class M embers.lSee Carter v. Forjas Taurus,

S.A., No. 16-15277, 2017 W L 2813844, at *5 (1 1th Cir. June 29, 2017) (holding that fee award

was f$a reasonable percentage of the settlementvalue'' when considering the value of an

' ln Plaintiffs' motion for tinal approval, and at the Fairness Hearing, Class Counscl assertcd that although the four

Settlement Amounts at issue (BMW, Mazda, Subaru, and Toyota) total $553,567,307, the value of the combinedsettlements increases to $741,287,307 when accounting for the value of the Customer Support Programs associatedwith the scttlements. Thus, the attorneys suggest that the fec request really amounts to 22.4 percent of the combinedsettlement value. The Court makes no tinding on the value of the settlements. lndeed, the valuc of the settlementsmay not be as large as the attorneys suggest. However, an attom eys' fee request totaling 30 percent of the

Settlement Amount is reasonable.

9

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 9 of 13

Page 10: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

tsenhanced warranty, which is itself a significant tangible benefif'). Second, in addition to the

time and labor already devoted to this case, Class Counsel will be required to expend

considerable time and effort over the fotlr-year lifespan of the settlement by overseeing and

adjusting the Outreach Program and Out-of-pocket Claims Process forthe benefk of Class

Members. See Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp., 454 F. Supp. 2d 1 185, 1216 (S.D. Fla.

2006) (holding that class counsel's post-approval work ççsupports the application of a higher fee

percentage award'').

24. Accordingly, the Court approves the application for attorneys' fees of 30 percent

of the $278,500,000 Settlement Amount, to be paid from the common fund.

V. DISM ISSAL OF CLAIM S; RELEASE

25. A11 economic loss claims asserted against Toyota in the Action are dismissed with

prejudice on the merits and without costs to any party, except as otherwise provided in this Order

or in the Settlement Agreement.

26. Upon entry of this Final Order and the Final Judgment, Class Representatives and

each Class Member (except those listed on Appendix B), on behalf of themselves and any other

legal or natural persons and entities who or which may claim by, tkough, or under them, release

their claims as outlined in the Settlement Agreement.

27. lf a Class M ember who does not opt out commences, files, initiates, or institutes

any new legal action or other proceeding against a Released Party for any claim released in this

Settlement in any federal or state court, arbitral tribtmal, or administrative or other forum, such

legal action or proceeding shall be dismissed with prejudice at that Class Member's cost.

28. The Court orders that the Settlem ent Agreem ent shall be the exclusive remedy for

al1 claim s released in the Settlement Agreem ent for a11 Class M em bers not listed on Appendix B.

10

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 10 of 13

Page 11: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

29. Therefore, except for those listed on Appendix B, al1 class representatives, Class

Members and their representatives are permanently barred and enjoined from, either directly,

through their representatives, or in any other capacity instituting, commencing, filing,

maintaining, continuing or prosecuting against any of the Released Parties any action or

proceeding in any court or tribtmalasserting any of the matters, claim s, or causes of action

described. ln addition, al1 class representatives, Class M embers, and a11 persons and entities in

active concert or participation with Class Members are permanently barred and enjoined from

organizing Class M embers who have not been excluded from the Class into a separate class for

purposes of pursuing, as a purported class action, any lawsuit against the Released Parties based

on or relating to the claim s and causes of action in the Complaint in the Action, or the facts and

circtlmstances relating thereto or the release in the Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

jj 1651(a) and 2283, the Court finds that issuance of this permanent injunction is necessary and

appropriate in aid of its continuing jurisdiction and authority over the settlement as set forth in

the Settlement Agreement, and the Action.

30. Class M embers are not precluded from addressing, contacting, dealing with, or

complying with requestsor inquiries from any govemmental authorities relating to the issues

raised in this class adion settlem ent.

Vl. OTH ER PROVISIONS

W ithout affecting the finality of this Final Order or the accompanying Final

Judgment, the Court retains continuing and exclusive jurisdiction over the Action and all matters

relating to the adm inistration, consumm ation, enforcem ent, and interpretation of the Settlement

Agreem ent and of this Final Order and the accompanying Final Judgm ent, to protect and

effectuate this Final Order and the accompanying Final Judgment, and for any other necessary

11

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 11 of 13

Page 12: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

purpose. The Parties, Class Representatives, and each Class M ember not listed on Appendix B

are deemed to have irrevocably submitted to the exclusive jurisdiction of this Court, for the

purpose of any suit, action, proceeding or dispute arising out of or relating to the Settlement

Agreement or the applicability of the Settlement Agreement, including the exhibits, and only for

such purposes.

32. If the Effective

automatically vacated and this Final Order and the accompanying Final Judgment, and other

Date does not occur, certification of the Class shall be

orders entered in connection with the Settlement Agreement and releases delivered in cormection

with the Settlement Agreement, shall be vacated and rendered null and void as provided by the

Settlement Agreement.

33. W ithout further order of the Courq the Parties may agree to reasonably necessary

extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the Settlement Agreement. Likewise, the

Parties may, without further order of the Court, agree to and adopt amendments to the Settlement

Agreement (including exhibits) as are consistent with this Final Order and the accompanying

Final Judgment and do not limit the rights of Class M embers under the Settlement Agreement.

34. Nothing in this Final Order or the accompanying Final Judgment shall preclude

any action in this Court to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

35. Neither this Final Order nor the accompanying Final Judgment (nor any document

related to the Settlement Agreement) is or shall be construed as an admission by the Parties.

Neither the Settlement Agreement (or its exhibits), this Final Order, the accompanying Final

Judgm ent, or any docum ent related to the Settlem ent Agreem ent shall be offered in any

proceeding as evidence against any of the Parties of any fact or legal claim; provided, however,

that Toyota and the Released Parties may file any and al1 such documents in support of any

12

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 12 of 13

Page 13: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

defense that the Settlement Agreement, this Final Order, the accompanying Final Judgment, and

any other related document is binding on and shall have res judicata, collateral estoppel, and/or

preclusive effect in any pending or f'uttlre lawsuit by any person or entity who is subject to the

release asserting a released claim against any of the Released Parties.

36. A copy of this Final Order shall be tiled in, and applies to, each economic loss

member action in this multidistrict litigation. Filed concurrently is the Court's Final Judgment.

Attached as Appendix A is a list of the Subject Vehicles (identified by make, model, and year) to

which these Orders and the Court's Final Judgment apply. Also attached as Appendix B is a list

of persons, entities, and organizations who have excluded themselves from (or ttopted out'' ot)

the Class.

DONE AND OIIDERED in Chambers#/ of october 2017.at M iami, Florida, this

FE . M OREN O

D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record

13

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 13 of 13

Page 14: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

APPENDIX A

TOYOTA SUBJECT VEHICLES

M odel Years M ake and M odel

2002-2004 Toyota Sequoia

2002-2005 Lexus 5C430

2003-2004 Toyota Tundra

2003-2007 GM -pontiac Vibe

2003-2007 Toyota Corolla (JPN)

2003-2008 Toyota Corolla (NAP)2003-2008 Toyota M atrix

2004-2005 Toyota RAV4

2005-2006 Toyota Ttmdra

2005-2007 Toyota Sequoia

2006-2010 Lexus SC430

2006-201 1 Toyota Yaris (HB)2006-2013 Lexus IS

2007-2012 Lexus ES350

2007-2012 Toyota Yaris (SDN)2008-2014 Lexus IS-F

2008-2015 Scion XB

2009-2013 Toyota Corolla (JPN)

2009-2013 Toyota Corolla (NAP)2009-2013 Toyota M atrix

2010-2015 Lexus IS250C/350C

2010-2016 Toyota 4Runner

2010-2017 Lexus GX460

2011-2014 Toyota Sienna

2012 Lexus LF-A

2014-2015 Lexus 15250/350

2014-2017 Toyota Corolla (NAP)2015-2017 Lexus RC350/300/2001

2015-2017 Lexus RC-F

2016 Scion iM

2016-2017 Lexus 15350/300/2007-

2017 Lexus GX460

2017 Toyota 4Runner

2017 Toyota iM

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 1

Page 15: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

APPENDIX B

PERSONS, ENTITIES, AND ORGANIZATIONS THAT HAVE EXCLUDED

THEM SELVES FROM THE TOYOTA SETTLEM ENT CLASS

1. KRISTINE A TOW ER

2. DIANA A SHERIN

3. JESSE JOHN PIETM S

4. EILEEN SULIVAN

5. JAN ICE B KING

6. JOHN W BAUKNECHT

7. HELEN J ROSE

8. HETALBEN N PM JAPATI

9. VERONICA J SYRIAC

10. LAUM X KALIL-YAGUE

11. RICHARD F HERR

12. ANNETTE V HERR

13. DIANE E OLDEN

14. ROBERT W GU STAVUS

15. DAVID E GAO NER

16. ARYEH S NATAN K ATZ

17. CHERYL A SZABLEW SKI

18. HAROLD L DIXON

19. PHYLLIS A HAM M

20. RICHAO PEA SE

21. NEOS PRODCTNS INC

22. PATRICIA F DICKEN S

23. GM CIE M SADLER

24. JEROM E HABER

25. PATRICIA A W ORTHINGTON

26. KENNETH J W ORTHINGTON

27. THOM AS H KREIM EIER

28. SUSAN F SYM INGTON

29. EILEEN M SM ITH

30. M ARILYN S M OLL

31. DIANE M JA COBS

32. JOEL N M EYERS

33. GOODM AN CARE INC

34. DIANNE C SULLER

35. ANTHON Y M VARRON

36. DIANA A DUMAS

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 16

Page 16: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

37. M ARIANNE E PISER

38. JUNE E LEN Z

39. EILEEN M M CGOW AN

40. CYNTHIA H RIVERS

41. SUSAN E SM ITH

42. KATHRYN W OBERTO

43. M ICHAEL J FLYN N

44. PATRICIA K BANNISTER

45. RYAN S YUSKO

46. DARLENE S M CKINNEY

47. DAVID M LUCAS

48. LORETTA M GRUTKOW SKI

49. DONNA G SILVERM AN

50. PHILLIP T KITCHEN

51. BERNARD S EM BLER

52. AARON S ZAK

53. ISAAC E KURTZ

54. M ARJLYN L BARRETT

55. W ILLIAM T O'HARA

56. SARAH C KORTA

57. CARLOS M AM ADOR

58. ALLISON R CLOSE

59. JAM ES R M CM URRAY

60. CYNTHIA H RIVERS

61. GREGG A M OCK

62. GEORGE S MELLGARD

63. VIJAYKUM AR B KHANDGE

64. SCOTT L MCCARTHY

65. PATRICIA A CURTIS

66. LOIS E PRESLIPSKY

67. HAE K LlM

68. FM NCES M RIN G

69. ESTORIA A PATTON

70. KENNETH J M ILLS

71. DAVID R GREEN

72. PATRICIA L SHAFFER

73. TERESA P OSBORN

74. NICHOLAS H CASEN TA

75. BRIAN C SEXTON

76. CAROL L FAN D

2

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 2 of 16

Page 17: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

77. ROLAND E HEILIG

78. BEVERLY M ETZGER

79. N URIA PEREZ

80. G THLEEN B HARDEN

81. M ARLA J SOTO-GONZALEZ

82. GEORGE L ARM STRONG JR

83. M ICHAEL A M ARCHEGIANO

84. M ICHAEL R HANCOCK

85. JULIE A TROUTW INE

86. ELIZABETH D RITCHEY

87. RONALD W CROCKETT

88. NASHALA L DUPLAIN

89. JOHN O HAY

90. JOHN W FLEM W G

91. CHARLES W HORNBECK

92. JESSE M LINDM AR

93. RONALD C LEN Z

94. M ATTHEW C W ISE

95. DAVID M M ARTIN

96. NICHOLAS P MARTIN

97. DOROTHY H ELBERT

98. LASCELLE A SHERRILL

99. VIRGINIA H M EDCALF

100. DOLORES M CORMIER

101. BENJAM W J LIEN

102. JENNIFER B DEGROOT

103. NORA K FINLEY

104. SYBLE D GARDNER

105. VICTOR W TSAI

106. M ARILYN A STEENW YK

107. CHRISTY ON EAL

108. DOAN D TH1 TRUSTEE

109. TOURAJ KHALILI

110. JOHN W FOSTER

111. DALE T W ILLIAM S

112. FAITH B PATTIU N

113. RITA E M ENDELSON

1 14. KIM BERLY A PALM ER

115. DIANE J YODER

116. N ICOLE A BEST

3

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 3 of 16

Page 18: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

117. PHILIP A LYNCH

118. SETH P W ISSN ER

119. PAM ELA J W IESER

120. FRAN COISE H LAM ONICA

121. LINDSAY R W OODS

122. M ILDRED D M OORE

123. PAM ELA A LAZARIS

124. KRISTIN J BAUM AN N

125. CAROLE S M OON

126. DAN IEL G W AINW RIGHT

127. KAREN A GEORGIADIS

128. W ENDY L YOUNG

129. YOOK L LOUIE

130. DEBM K SM ILEY

131. EUDYR DEM AGALHAES

132. CATHERINE E LAND

133. M ARY J M ULROONEY

134. MELISSA HAUGER

135. CHAD M CCOY

136. JASON ALEM NDER

137. RUTH E SHOEM AKER

138. DIONNE M GRANT

139. LEANDRO GIACOM ELLI

140. TRINA P JACKSON

141. ELIZABETH J CASEY

142. SAN G H LEE

143. LESLIE R PINCHUK

144. EVA E FAIRM AN

145. JACQUELW E P ROBINSON

146. JACQUELINE P ROBINSON147. CHARLEN E R KELM

148. RUTH K BATES

149. SUM A ALSAFFAR

150. ROSALIN M ENDEZ

151. JAM ES L W INES

152. PETRONA S TRUJILLO

153. M YM LlU

154. M ARIA l M ARISTANY

155. CHRISTY ONEAL

156. THOM A S M BUTTS

4

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 4 of 16

Page 19: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

157. GARY W LAMBRECHT

158. DENA M BARON

159. M ARK G MAGEE

160. STEPHANIE N GORDON

161. DALE C HUBER

162. VALERIE J DAVIS

163. JEFFREY S AGUINAGA

164. REBECCA G CM W L

165. M ARIA PIAZZA

166. JESSICA L RJTZKE

167. ZEYAD T ALW AHIB

168. CAROL D TAGGART

169. GISELA M BALINA

170. ELAINE BEST

171. HELEN A M IYAGI

172. SARA K FLYNN

173. SAM K FLYNN

174. SARA K FLYNN

175. SANDRA L GRAHAM

176. TERRI N GAUTIER SVETICH

177. EM ILY R LECKIE

178. LOAN BU1

179. CAROL H CONNAW AY

180. ELLEN HILDNER

181. JOEL K HANSON

182. GARY HALEY

183. STELLA Y CHIU

184. KATHLEEN OLEKSZULW

185. JOANNE G ROM E

186. REBECCA A THOM AS

187. SAN DRA FAYARD

188. KENNETH P HVARRE

189. BENJAM IN H PICKENS

190. VERONICA DEIGHAN

191. W ILLIAM EKLOW & JOANNA M ORRIS

192. FUM EI LIANG

193. EDW ARD G ROBINSON

194. SUSAN P M ON SON

195. M ARK JOHNSON

196. VICHET KHAUV

5

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 5 of 16

Page 20: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

197. JEANE M I N AITO

198. HARRY R W ALLEN

199. GEORGE A LUCE

200. CHRISTOPHER M KIRCHER

201. ZACHARY KERSULIS

202. PATRICK DECHANT

203. RUSSELL H GIBBS

204. M ARVIN V SW DEL

205. W AUNITA GOOCH

206. GEORGIA COLLINS

207. PAUL T DECLERCQ208. AM IE L BM NT

209. JOHN A DAVIS

210. RILEY A SM ITH

21 1. K AREN L HANM HAN

212. M ICHAEL D M ILLER

213. ANDREI BUCUR

214. RICHARD A EICHER

215. THOM AS K SM ITH

216. EARLINE A MENARD

217. JO SEPH F LETTIERI

218. REBECCA H BENZER

219. ROSE M W ALDRON

220. GEORGE S CANDY

221. LARRY W HURST

222. TIM OTHY L SCHM IDT

223. STEPHEN M W ARD

224. M A SAKAZU K M ATSUSHITA

225. CAROL N JUBB

226. REBECCA J STEW ART

227. EDW ARD M BUTRICK

228. M ERRY SU SSM AN

229. JOANNE G GARCIA

230. M LPH P RUFFOLO

231. HELEN K M ULHERN

232. CHARLOTTE L ANDERSON

233. ELON L TURPIN

234. SUSAN SCHM IDT

235. REBECCA L GARBER

236. CAROLYN K M AU HEW S

6

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 6 of 16

Page 21: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

237. M ARY S REU SCH

238. ANGELA W VICTOIUA JACOBS

239. VICTOR F JIM ENEZ

240. M ATTHEW M YRICK

241. JANETTE G BABER

242. SUZANNE REX

243. CASANDM JUDD

244. M ICHAEL AM BURGEY

245. STEPHEN C OSBORNE

246. FM N K T GRYW ALSKI

247. W ILSON S DOBBS

248. BONNIE E PUTM AN

249. DOUGLAS E W RIGHT

250. IRENE RODRIGUEZ

251. STEPHANIE A CHOURY

252. TERI L GIOVAN W EHODGES

253. ROBIN KEEGAN

254. JOSEPH BRENCIC & PROVIDEN CE BM N CIC

255. KlM M HUNTER

256. JERRY JAM ES JOHNS SR TRUST

257. M ELANIE K LEE

258. ANDREA N DELONG

259. CAROL A HAM M ER

260. CAROLYN M CCAM BRIDGE

261. CATHERW E GILCHRIEST

262. BROOKE R DUKES

263. SANDRA K EVERSON

264. ROBERT E BRANCH

265. DEBRA L KUMM ERS

266. LINDA A BROW ER

267. CRYSTALE J REASON

268. JASON E CASTRO

269. ALBERT YOUNAN

270. SHARON A RODRIGUEZ

271. DAVID L W ILLIAM S

272. AUDREY DOU GHTY

273. RUSSELL A M ILLER

274. RUSSELL A M ILLER

275. DONNA L ASHURST

276. M ARYLOUISE LILLEM OEN

7

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 7 of 16

Page 22: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

277. HIM M LEE-GONZALEZ

278. JONATHAN GARCEAU

279. DEBORAH LYN IUCHTER 2005 LIVING TRUST

280. DENNIS N KESSLER

281. INGRID K KIMM ONS

282. NATALIE C M ACHTIG

283. RICARDO G M INJARES & SHARON M W JARES

284. N EIL D W ISE

285. W ILLIAM H M ORROW

286. M ICHAEL R OVERTON

287. CHRISTOPHER E CHILDS

288. M ARIO J SAFFOLD

289. N ORM A S

290. BARBAM J PENNEY

291. LAUREL A GINGRICH

292. IVELLISS SANTOS-COTTO

293. BARBAM J W ORTHAM

294. M ONDAM PHAY

295. SHIRLEY Y BOLIN

296. BARBAM L ENGLAND

297. JOHN N VASILAKIS

298. GRAHAM STEEN

299. RAGHUNANDAN KESHAVAM URTHY

300. ROBYN M COFFIN

301. LONNIE ROBIN SON

302. JUDITH L M CGUIN N

303. ROBIN J M ARSHALL

304. FLORENCE SARACSON

305. DENNIS B BAEZA

306. CHARLES L BRITTON

307. LOUISE CADDEN

308. REYNALDO C PASA

309. AM ANDA C W HELESS

310. M EGHAN M PIERSON

311. EDGARDO M PANCIPANCI

312. JANET R PEIFFER

313. EDNA JOHN SON

314. JOYCE Y BURGESS

315. GORDON TAM

316. CLAIRE S W ESTENHAVER LORETZ

8

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 8 of 16

Page 23: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

317. JOANN SCHANO

318. KAREN LAGRECA

319. RISHA A SM ITH

320. RAYM OND J HOW ARD

321. HYAE RHEE

322. SCOTT W M ORRISON

323. IRENE BOREVITZ

324. LAUM R CONTI

325. DIBA KAZERANI

326. JASM INE C COLEM AN BLAIR

327. CHRISTIAN NE L KURTZ

328. RUTH A BALSLEY

329. SAMANTHA S HODGES

330. STACY N OUTLAW

331. FLORENCE T SHAM BERGER

332. ANN W ILDE

333. NIKOLA PENAVA

334. KENNETH D W ARD

335. HETTIE C STATEN

336. RAYM OND C W HEATLEY

337. LIBAN M AHAM ED

338. ELAINE L GURGANUS

339. PATIUCIA M CARRANZA

340. GARY W CLIFTON

341. W ESLEY B BELLEVILLE

342. LEON ARD L LOM BARD

343. ANDREA LOM BARD

344. SALLY M FORT

345. M ATTHEW NIBLETT

346. EVANN M HOPKW S

347. SALLY P HARRELL

348. MELISSA S DAVIS

349. TED A HAM ILTON

350. U TH Y J W ISKOFSKE

351. EVA M GENTRY

352. LAYLA M FISEK

353. LAUM YOSHIDA

354. M ICHAEL H OSTLEY & M ARY E OSTLEY

355. LILY N AYANO

356. KATHERINE L NELSON

9

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 9 of 16

Page 24: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

357. AM ANDA M LARUE

358. BOBBIE GOGGW S

359. GRACE KAM INSKI

360. JAN E E CM W FORD

361. JOHN H FEROLITO

362. BRENDA B M ILLER

363. SCOTT R BUB

364. GRISSEL G FONSECA ESCOBAR

365. TIRUW ORK K ALEMU

366. ROSS C MADSEN

367. JOHN F GAUGHAN

368. ELIZABETH A KERR

369. BERNADETTE HAN

370. DAV ID B POSNER

371. KATE S LANDRIES

372. BRADLEY 1 BRU STM AN M ARSHALL

373. CRISTINA E GROSCHEL

374. SUSAN J LAVELL

375. DIANNE L FITCH

376. KENNETH DAVID PINCKNEY

377. ROBIN L TANNEHILL

378. JOYCE SHOOK

379. LEW G SCHUW EILER

380. CRAIG A GILL

381. IQATHERINE M GARFIELD

382. FELICITA SANCHEZ

383. LYNNE J STEINEL

384. JEANETTE F PINION

385. JESSE R BURKHOLDER

386. LINDA D M ILLER

387. CLIFFORD L GALLIN GTON

388. IQAREN T KW OK

389. RODN EY P W AIR

390. JORGE V PADILLA

391. JULIE C GILL

392. JILL A GERONTIS

393. EDUARDO M HERNANDEZ

394. M ELISSA F RICHARDSON

395. LINDA L TORREAN O-OUAHM ANE

396. ERIKA TOLLCZYK

10

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 10 of 16

Page 25: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

397. M ICHAEL DUH

398. RITA D CHA SE

399. ALYSSA L ALAS

400. JAM IE L M OLTZAN

401. FROTASHA BUXTON

402. TIDO J HOLTKAM P

403. PHYLLIS E STANDISH

404. DUSTY D DOM INA

405. CHRISTOPHER J SUTTON-PM STON

406. M ELISSA S DOW NES

407. RENEE M EBY

408. ROBERT D HEDDEN

409. VALERIE S CAM BALLO

410. PATRICIA K M URPHY

411. ALFRED J BORREGO

412. ROBERT L JENKINS

413. JANE E CM W FORD

414. M ARGARETE A K AHLER

415. JOAN A HESSLER

416. FRANCISCA VAZQUEZ-MIM NDA417. KERRY BRINSON

418. DIANE F RETH

419. N ELSON J FERRER BLAN CO

420. M ANSUKH D KARDANI

421. JOSEPH C LANDW EHR

422. DOUGLAS A ROLAN

423. BILLY J RO SS

424. BETTY W ALKER

425. CHAD A LYN N

426. FERN R COM BS

427. ROSENDA CASTILLA

428. HEATHER FILBRUN

429. LUTHER M M ATTHEW S

430. JAMES J W OJCIK

431. BELW DA F LADD

432. JENNIFER R OSTERTAG

433. LINDA L PHILLIPS

434. ROBERTO J BRITO GUEVARA

435. GARY D LEW IS

436. NAN CY C SURLES

11

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 11 of 16

Page 26: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

437. STEPHEN R M OYE

438. M ARVIN D M OTT

439. TODD ZIEBARTH

440. M UOI N LAM

441. M ARJA E BLACKM ON & KELLY RYAN BLACKM ON

442. AM Y E VARGO

443. CHARLES M RHINEHART

444. CAROL L BOZIGIAN

445. HANNAH C PULCASTRO

446. TIM OTHY J DONATO

447. JILL DONATO

448. ROBERT A ROONEY

449. SANDM P LILLY

450. DONNA J ST. AM AND

451. LORETTA M LYNN

452. M ARY A LEV INE

453. SONJA A GRZECH

454. M ICHELLE L DURHAM

455. SIVARAM AKRISHNA NELABHOTLA

456. DAVID S LUTZEW ITZ

457. M ARITZA A GOM EZ

458. CM IG L EVERHART

459. ROBERT L CHRISTIAN SON

460. SYLV IA E HUDEC

461. M ARGARITA J BAZELEY

462. BRITTANY J SM ALL

463. AM Y K W INKLER

464. JOHN V FM NCIS

465. AKLILU M AA SHO

466. SUM ITAVA DE

467. BECKY HOLESAPPLE

468. AM BER L DENNIS

469. CYNANNBRAH ISOM

470. JONATHAN Z VINCENT

471. JARED PETERS

472. JOCELYN A JOHNSON

473. KEITH G LEE

474. TERESA R DYKEM A

475. DAVID G CHEUNG

476. ALICE J VAN DERHYDEN

12

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 12 of 16

Page 27: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

477. VADA MCNERTNEY

478. JAM ES P PHILLIPS

479. JONATHAN A BALASA

480. ALICJA W BA LA SA

481. JAE H CHOI

482. HYUN J KIM

483. M ILDRED M PHELPS M ADISON

484. GREGORY S M OSTROM

485. NIKITA M JONES

486. M ARYELLEN T M ARZETTA

487. BRIAN D HEALY

488. JAY M ANNING & ROBERTA MANNW G

489. SANDRA M PIEDM ONTE

490. LATASHA M W ATERS

491. BONNIE L CROYL

492. YOLANDA D W INFIELD

493. M ARCIE L MUSEN

494. DAVID J ALEM N DER

495. W ANDA K HARTLE

496. ALPHON SO A JOHNSON

497. TERESA P ALW OOD

498. TANNY T TRINH

499. W ILLIAM A SETTER

500. RENATE W ILLIAM S

501. M ARIA M M OS

502. PATRICIA E GONSALVES & ALFRED GONSALVES

503. GENE P NYM AN

504. M UL GON ZALEZ

505. ELIZABETH VERAS

506. M ILDRED F DOM INGUEZ

507. M IGUEL A GARCES TAPIA

508. M IGUEL A GARCES TAPIA

509. M IGUEL A GARCES TAPIA

510. W ILLIE E BM DLEY

511. M AM O J SAFFOLD

512. SONIA BUENROSTRO

513. SARA K FLYNN

514. JAM ES T HAN SEN

515. VICTORIA L HUFFM AN

516. RIA W ESTPHAL

13

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 13 of 16

Page 28: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

517. NIM IT JAIN

518. ELAINE DANEY

519. SHIRLEY A HOLLEY

520. DAVID C M ILLER

521. DOUGLA S LINDE

522. SANDM L TAYLOR

523. M ATTHEW J POLDER

524. JINLIE LOUM ILLER

525. ELIZABETH A BELL

526. OSAM AH I SHAREEF

527. RICHARD SEPESI

528. JONATHAN STINE

529. LISA DETTLING

530. AILEEN E PAU LSON

531. KIM BERLY VILLALOBOS

532. SRAVAN K BUSIREDDY

533. M ELVIN G UFFM AN

534. JOAN P HILLIARD

535. NANCY M AGUIM

536. KAYLA E LIBBY

537. M ELISSA TETER

538. M ELISSA TETER

539. LYNN P CLOUD

540. CM IG D EDGAR

541. SUM IN I SOEPARN O

542. ALVARO G RW ERA

543. TERRI LYNN W ILLETT

544. CYNTHIA L HAGOOD

545. LAURA BAIRD

546. HEM ERT C JONES

547. ANDRE H W ADE M ARCEL

548. YISSEL S LOPEZ

549. SARA M SCHILLING

550. JASON R PETTIT

551. N ICOLE P HUNT

552. THOM AS A M ILLER & STEPHANIE CHARLENE M ILLER

553. CHRISTINA M RENCIS

554. M ICHAEL E W INKELM AN

555. M ELVW W OODRUFF

556. GLEN NA JON ES

14

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 14 of 16

Page 29: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

557. PAUL F CONNERS

558. RENE GIANOLA

559. GAIL SHULER

560. SARAH E SKELTON

561. DAVID A N IELSEN

562. JUDITH M HUNT

563. JEROM E L HUNT

564. ASHLI ENGEN

565. CURTIS STEIER

566. CAROL STEIER

567. FM NK S KUPIDLOW SKI

568. PAM ELA KRUPKE

569. ANDRE C VAN SLEE

570. ALEJAN DRO PM CIA DO

571. M ARY HASSANI

572. U YLA L EICKHOFF

573. EARLENE JAM ES

574. M ADONNA BAILEY

575. LARRY W COKER

576. FERN R COM BS

577. ROBERT DUNLAP

578. GEM LD A AUST & BELINDA K AU ST

579. DAW N I POOLE

580. ELENA BECKER

581. HERBERT B SHEPHEO

582. W ENDELL EM ERY

583. SHAYLA K SCOTT

584. JONATHAN M ECK

585. NIDIA PRIETO

586. LILIA VALITOVA

587. M ICHELLE SHAFM R

588. M OSHE SHAFRIR

589. REBEKAH RICHM ON D

590. CLINTON E BOUCHER

591. ENEDELIA LEDESM A

592. ROBERT J HATHORN

593. ROSEM ARY C HARRISON

594. M ARTHA URIEGA S

595. KATHLEEN L THOM PSON

596. LEONAD L LISIECKI

15

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 15 of 16

Page 30: Representative Service Awards and ... - Takata Settlement · coming into existence as a ççqualified settlement fund'' on the latter of the date the Escrow Under the çlrelation

597. ISABEL ROSALIA SIFUENTES

598. M ARK D SU LTON

599. SUZANNE L W OLDING

600. SU SAN M M ATHEW S

601. EDGARDO SAUL

602. KRISTINE R EVAN S

603. DANIEL W RONA

604. LIAN E LOPEZ

605. CONOR M CGUINN

16

Case 1:14-cv-24009-FAM Document 694-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 16 of 16