Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Research Data Shared Service (RDSS)CRIS2018
Anna Clements | euroCRIS & University of St Andrews @AnnaKClements | ORCID: 0000-0003-2895-1310
Dom Fripp | Jisc@Domicus | ORCID: 0000-0001-5352-4666
Jan Dvorak | euroCRIS & Czech Technical UniversityORCID: 0000-0001-8985-152X
Content
› Introducing Jisc
› Jisc Research Data Services Context
› RDSS context and vision
› RDSS timeline and progress
› RDSS at St Andrews
› Data Model & CERIFication Project
Link on https://www.jisc.ac.uk/rd/projects/research-data-shared-service
2 CRIS2018
Introducing Jisc
Jisc is the UK higher, further education and skills sectors’ not-for-profit organisation
for digital services and solutions
Operate shared digital infrastructure and
services
Provide trusted advice and practical assistance for
universities, colleges and learning providers
We…
Negotiate sector-wide deals and conditions with IT vendors
and commercial publishers
CRIS2018
RDSS: How and Why?
» Drivers
» More than £5 million investment over 2 years
» Open access
» Sector defined requirements
› “R@R” co-design
› Over half the HEI sector involved
Reduced incomeRisk to research funding
Lost value of research work (17% lost key data – DAF survey)Loss of research data
Legal threat and cost (Unlimited fines with GDPR)Leakage of sensitive data
Key staff leave (75% EXPECT HEI to do this)Researcher reputation
Defensible integrity of research, responding to FOI etc. (e.g. Climategate £10m?)
Institution reputation
Inefficient research and over-expensive ITCost and risk of delivery
Co
sts
& r
isk
sC
on
seq
ue
ntia
l loss
CRIS2018
RDSS: The Challenge
»To meet the sector’s requirements we need
› True multi tenant
› Multi content
› Shared data model
› Interoperable
› Sustainable
› Much improved user experience
RDSS: The Vision
mu
lti-
ten
ant
adm
inis
trat
ion
m
ult
i-te
nan
t ad
min
istr
atio
n
Discovery User Interfaces and PortalsDiscovery User Interfaces and Portals
AP
Is
AP
Is
User Interfaces
User InterfacesUser
InterfacesUser
InterfacesUser Interfaces
User InterfacesTenant User
InterfacesTenant User
Interfaces
APIsAPIs
JiscReporting
JiscReporting
AP
Is
AP
Is
AP
Is
AP
Is
Scholarly Communications,
Service APIs
Scholarly Communications,
Service APIs
Tenant Repository, CRIS and research
systems
Tenant Repository, CRIS and research
systems
AP
Is
AP
Is
Tenant StorageTenant
Storage
AP
Is
AP
Is
Jisc Repository Core Infrastructure
APIsAPIs
Preservation Systems
ArchivematicaPreservicaDataVaultMetadata StoreMetadata Store
Tenant User Interfaces
Tenant User Interfaces
Publish Subscribe Messaging
Service
Publish Subscribe Messaging
Service
Cloud Data Storage
(Access and Archival)
Cloud Data Storage
(Access and Archival)
CRIS2018
RDSS: Where we are now» Core
Architecture
› multitenant database
› Interoperability layer
» Data model
» Proof of concept front end API
» Initial Front end design
BL User Interfaces
BL User Interfaces
BL User Interfaces
BL User Interfaces
BL User Interfaces
BL User Interfaces
Tenant User
Interfaces
Tenant User
Interfaces BL
mu
lti-
ten
ant
adm
in
BL
mu
lti-
ten
ant
adm
in
Discovery User Interfaces and PortalsDiscovery User Interfaces and Portals
AP
IsA
PIs
Reporting / StorageReporting / Storage
AP
IsA
PIs
AP
IsA
PIs
AP
IsA
PIs
PreservationPreservation CRIS systems
CRIS systems
AP
IsA
PIs
BL systems
BL systems
Jisc Repository Core Infrastructure
Jisc Repository Core Infrastructure
PreservationPreservation CRIS systems
CRIS systems
BL systems
BL systems
AP
IsA
PIs
Preservation
Preservation
mu
lti-
ten
ant
adm
in
mu
lti-
ten
ant
adm
in
Discovery User Interfaces and PortalsDiscovery User Interfaces and Portals
Reporting / StorageReporting / Storage
AP
IsA
PIs
AP
IsA
PIs
AP
IsA
PIs
ScholcommsSchol
commsTenant systemsTenant systems
AP
IsA
PIs
Tenant StorageTenant Storage
Jisc Repository Core Infrastructure
Jisc Repository Core Infrastructure
APIsAPIs APIsAPIs
CRIS2018
RDSS: Roadmap
CRIS2018
RDSS: St Andrews pilot institution» Pure is our data
catalogue & repository
» RDSS pulling metadata and files from API into preservation systems
» We are trialling both Archivematica & Preservica
» Nothing passed back to Pure ... yet
BL User Interfaces
BL User Interfaces
BL User Interfaces
BL User Interfaces
BL User Interfaces
BL User Interfaces
Tenant User
Interfaces
Tenant User
Interfaces BL
mu
lti-
ten
ant
adm
in
BL
mu
lti-
ten
ant
adm
in
Discovery User Interfaces and PortalsDiscovery User Interfaces and Portals
AP
IsA
PIs
Reporting / StorageReporting / Storage
AP
IsA
PIs
AP
IsA
PIs
PreservationPreservation CRIS systems
CRIS systems
AP
IsA
PIs
BL systems
BL systems
Jisc Repository Core Infrastructure
Jisc Repository Core Infrastructure
PreservationPreservation CRIS systems
CRIS systems
BL systems
BL systems
AP
IsA
PIs
Preservation
Preservation
mu
lti-
ten
ant
adm
in
mu
lti-
ten
ant
adm
in
Discovery User Interfaces and PortalsDiscovery User Interfaces and Portals
Reporting / StorageReporting / Storage
AP
IsA
PIs
AP
IsA
PIs
ScholcommsSchol
comms PUREPURE
AP
IsA
PIs
Tenant StorageTenant Storage
Jisc Repository Core Infrastructure
Jisc Repository Core Infrastructure
APIsAPIs APIsAPIs
CRIS2018
Goal for St Andrews: sustainable digital preservation
» Integrate with our existing systems particularly, Pure - to keep single interface for researchers and rekeying of metadata and transfer of data to a minimum
» Provide a preservation platform/service - integrated with Pure; two-way – preservation status back into Pure
» Solution that is flexible e.g. loosely coupled integrations -based on standards, to ensure we can swap systems in/out easily
» Solution that works for other digital content e.g. university records, building plans, e-theses, digitised special collections
RDSS: Priorities
» First priority is research data
› Research output (Article/Thesis etc.)
› Research data
› Research software/code
› Provenance metadata (method)
» But also…..
› Preservation systems tailored for multiple digital objects and data types
› Use cases and pilots for objects beyond research data
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/https://www.flickr.com/photos/cogdog/
CRIS2018
RDSS: Modelling interoperability
CRIS2018
RDSS: CERIFication project
CRIS2018
Project goals
» RDSS logical data model mapped to CERIF logical data model, including full documentation.
» Specific use cases of RDSS, or related services, mapped to CERIF-XML and accompanying guidelines for use.
» CERIF model feedback to euroCRIS and consideration in enhancements to the standard.
» Engagement via workshop/webinar(s) to disseminate outcomes from project.
CRIS2018
RDSS: Canonical Data Model
CRIS2018 https://github.com/JiscRDSS/rdss-canonical-data-model
CollectionCollection
ObjectObject
FileFile
OrganisationOrganisation
OrganisationUnit
OrganisationUnit
PersonPerson
ProjectGrant
ProjectGrant
RDSS: Data Model CERIFication
CRIS2018
RDSS class CERIF entity
Person Person
Organisation OrgUnit
Project Project
Grant Funding
Collection Service
Object ResultPublicationResultProductResultPatentEventEquipment
File Medium
Mapping example - CDM to CERIF
CRIS2018
An example of data model economy
CRIS2018
CDM 3.0.0CDM 2.0.0
Alignment with CERIF resulted in handling session (authentication) metadata elsewhere and keeping the CDM about core metadata fields to aid interoperability with CRISes.
RDSS Information Interchange Use Cases
CRIS2018
CRISCRIS RDSSRDSSDeposit objects
Deposit files
Read/Update contextOrganisations, Persons, Projects, Grants
Search for the CollectionAdd it if not found
Usage statistics
Notable preservation events
CRIS2018
Thank you!
Anna Clements [email protected] @annakclementsAssistant Director Library Services (Digital Research), University of St Andrews
Jan Dvorak [email protected] specialist, Computing and Information Centre, Czech Technical University
Dom Fripp [email protected] @DomicusSenior curation metadata developer, Jisc