Upload
derek-boyd
View
220
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Research Experiences for Research Experiences for TeachersTeachers
Impact on StudentsImpact on Students
Columbia University’s Columbia University’s Summer Research Summer Research Program for Science TeachersProgram for Science Teachers
22ndnd National RET Conference National RET Conference Redwood City, CA Redwood City, CA November 14, 2003November 14, 2003
Jay Dubner, Program CoordinatorJay Dubner, Program Coordinator
Research Experiences for Research Experiences for TeachersTeachers
Impact on StudentsImpact on Students
Columbia University’s Columbia University’s Summer Research Summer Research Program for Science TeachersProgram for Science Teachers
22ndnd National RET Conference National RET Conference Redwood City, CA Redwood City, CA November 14, 2003November 14, 2003
Jay Dubner, Program CoordinatorJay Dubner, Program Coordinator
“Practice What You Teach”
“Practice What You Teach”
Columbia’s Summer Research Program for Science Teachers was established in 1990 for the purpose of contributing to the improvement of science achievement of students by providing science teachers with experience in the practice of science. Teachers become members of research teams.
Program Demographics1990-2003
149 middle and high school science teachers
85% public schools 56% women 46% minorities
NSF-Supported Programs at Columbia University
MRSEC (Materials Research & Science Engineering Center)– 12 teachers (1999-2003)
EMSI (Environmental Molecular Sciences Institute)– 8 teachers (1999-2003)
NSEC (Nanotechnology Science & Engineering Center)– 2 teachers (2002-03)
Alison Biuso, Asst. Director of Education
Program Design
20-25 middle and high school science teachers work as a full-time member of a research team (4 days a week)
Work along side faculty, graduate students, post docs & technicians Weekly seminars to build a professional learning community.
– Science content: seminars with speakers on topics of broad general interest – Lectures are videotaped
– Science communication: describe their research projects to each other– Science teaching: Lead hands-on demo lessons, engage in discussions
of common concern– Peer coaching: 2nd year participants provide guidance and
encouragement to 1st year participants 8 weeks each summer for 2 consecutive summers Graduate Students and Post-Doctoral Students visit teacher’s school
once a month between October and May
Goals of the Program
Update lessons & labs to contain current science information Increase inquiry-based instruction Implement collaborative learning Bring materials and resources back to the school Educate students on many career opportunities in the
sciences Use Internet as a research tool Introduce new technologies Stay updated on findings in science (e.g. read scientific
journals)
Expected Program Outcomes
Increased student interest in science Increased student achievement in science
GenesisGenesis
In 1994, Columbia’s Summer Research Program began collecting quantitative student data from NYC public high schools- Treatment Group -- Students in science classes of Program teachers (Prior to program participation through completion of 2-year program)
- Comparison Group -- Students in science classes of non-participating teachers from the same schools
Findings
Program has engaged teachers intellectually
Provided them with new avenues of professional & personal growth
Increased their appreciation for the process of scientific discovery
Enhanced their ability to converse the excitement and vitality of science to their students and fellow educators
Instruments Administered
Pre-program survey Post-program survey Mentor survey Spring implementation survey
2002 Teacher Survey Data 96% stated they have shared Columbia-derived information, materials
and/or resources with other school personnel.
91% reported increasing hands-on activities in their classrooms and/or new laboratory exercises in response to their experiences at Columbia.
86% reported developing new or revised content to lessons and/or labs since participating in Columbia’s Program*.
64% reported discussing science careers and related job requirements with their students.
78% reported increasing problem-solving activities in their classes.
•* 200 Lesson & lab plans referencing the National Science Standards on Program’s Web site
2002 Teacher Survey Data (con’t)
78% reported initiating or increasing their use of computers since their participation in the program.
70% reported reading scientific journals more frequently than before.
68% reported assuming new leadership roles/responsibilities in their school/district/region.
64% reported increased requirements for formal written reports and/or oral presentation requirements.
Student Performance Student Performance IndicatorsIndicators
Student Performance Student Performance IndicatorsIndicators
Data Collected from:Data Collected from:– Science Club ParticipationScience Club Participation– Intel Science Talent Project ParticipationIntel Science Talent Project Participation– NYS Science Regents Exam ScoresNYS Science Regents Exam Scores– NYS Science Regents Exam Pass RateNYS Science Regents Exam Pass Rate
9.6%
3.2%
14.6%
2.9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Prior 2nd in
Year of Participation
Science Clubs
Teachers
Control Group
0.09%
0.18%
0.47%
0.16%
0.00%
0.20%
0.40%
0.60%
Percentage Students
Involved in Intel Projects
Prior After 2nd Year
Year in Program
Intel Science Talent Search
Teachers
Control Group
32.9%37.6%
42.1%36.4%
43.9%
32.7%
48.3%
37.1%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
Pass Rate Percentage
Prior After 1 yr After 2 yr After 3 yr
Year of Program Participation
Regents Pass Rate
teachers
control
Funding Sources
Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Camille & Henry Dreyfus Foundation JP Morgan Chase Foundation Howard Hughes Medical Institute Laura B. Vogler Foundation National Institutes of Health National Science Foundation New York Times Company Foundation Pfizer Foundation, Inc. Waksman Foundation for Microbiology