Upload
salma-abaza
View
30
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Running Head: GENDER SELECTION? SOUNDS MORE LIKE SEXISM
Gender selection: Sounds more like sexism?
Salma Abaza
57796
The American University of Sharjah
1
Running Head: GENDER SELECTION? SOUNDS MORE LIKE SEXISM
Abstract
This research discusses the issue of gender selection in the Arab world. The procedure
has recently been introduced to the region; however, its popularity is growing due to
its high demand. Studies have shown that families choose to use gender selection for
three main reasons, which include: prevention of gender-linked diseases, preference
towards a certain gender, family balancing. Due to an increased number of gender
selective operations occurring, the sex ratio in many different regions of the world has
been greatly distorted. Experts have explained the high sex ratio by stating that there
are many countries with a preference for sons. This high sex ratio can have many
negative impacts on society, which will be further discussed throughout the piece.
These impacts raise the question of whether or not this procedure should be banned?
Many experts have spoken out for both sides of the issue, and some societies have
already banned the procedure.
2
GENDER SELECTION? SOUNDS MORE LIKE SEXISM
Introduction
Have you ever felt that women in the Middle East are outnumbered by men
(Clawson, 2009, para. 4)? If you have, then what you’re seeing is nothing compared
to what you’ll see in 5, 10, or 20 years from now. If you haven’t felt a difference
between the number of women and men, then just wait and see the results of many
studies and experiments in this field. By now, you’re probably wondering how this
could even occur since there’s always a 50-50 chance in conceiving a female or a
male. This outcome is due to the advances in technology, which have managed to
skew with the natural course of bringing a child into this world. The Center for
Human Reproduction (2014) defines gender selection (GS) as the “fertility procedure
used to choose the gender of a baby prior to conception” (para. 1). Many families are
taking advantage of this new trend, they see it as an opportunity brought forth them.
They undergo this procedure without taking the large-scale impacts of their decision
into consideration. Even though GS hasn’t been done in all countries around the
world, it is not long before many of those countries take part of this technology.
Countries such as the United Kingdom and Canada have banned sex selection unless
it was for a medical reason, such as a gender-linked disease (Clarke, 2009, para. 6;
Adams, 2012, para. 5). On the contrary, Middle Eastern countries, specifically the
UAE, are embracing this technology and providing it to any family who seeks to have
a child of their preferred gender (Al Hameli, 2014, p. 1). Studies have shown that 3
out of 4 Emirati couples seek gender selection every month (p. 1). Many authors and
experts have explained their concern due to the irrecoverable impacts that could occur
if this technology keeps advancing. Parents in the Middle East should not be able to
select the gender of their child due to a high sex ratio, increased crime rates, and
3
GENDER SELECTION? SOUNDS MORE LIKE SEXISM
discrimination against a certain gender (“Gender and Genetics,” n.d., para. 3; Levy,
2007, para. 8).
How does it work?
The development of sex selection was created due to the advances in assisted
reproductive technology (ART). According to the Center for Human Reproduction
(2015), there are only two main methods for how families could select the gender of
their child. The first method is Microsort, which is no longer used; and the second
method that is currently being used nowadays is preimplantation genetic diagnosis
(PGD) alongside in vitro fertilization (IVF). Microsort is also known as sperm
sorting; it is the process that “separates the sperm cells in a semen sample” to obtain
the desired gender (para. 6). This process is not used anymore (para. 1) since it only
has an approximated 90% success rate with female embryos, and an estimated 85%
success rate with male embryos (para. 6). The current procedure being used by most
physicians around the world, especially in the Middle East, involves a two-step
process of IVF followed by PGD (para. 1). IVF collects the female’s egg and the
male’s sperm and then fertilizes them for the following steps in the procedure (“In
Vitro Fertilization,” 2014, para. 1). The next step called PGD is the procedure that
selects the sex of the child, and the procedure that allows the physician to identify the
embryos with diseases; this is used to differentiate between the embryos that will be
implanted in the mother (“Gender Selection,” 2014, para.3; “Preimplantation Genetic
Diagnosis,” 2014, para. 1). PGD is particularly beneficial in cases where families
have gender-related diseases, which is why it is necessary for them to undergo sex
selection (“Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis,” 2014, para. 2). Moreover, it is also
important for families without sex-linked diseases who want to conceive a child of
4
GENDER SELECTION? SOUNDS MORE LIKE SEXISM
their preferred gender because this process is the most efficient in helping families
conceive their desired gender, and it eliminates the chances of any child with an
illness (para. 3). Despite the fact that there are two different ways for gender
selection, having a successful procedure requires extremely deliberate care. For this
purpose, all physicians are required to run certain tests on their patients in order to
guarantee the favorable outcome.
Argument on sex ratio
Researches and experiments have shown that an increase in sex selection
leads to an imbalance between the genders, thus, altering with society’s norm of an
almost equal sex ratio (Hesketh & Xing, 2006, para. 8). An article written by Neil
Levy (2007) explains that the cause of a high sex ratio is the “product of a strong
preference for male offspring” (para. 4). He states that in 1996 China had a sex ratio
of 121 boys for every hundred girls; Levy also refers to Amartya Sen’s argument on
how over 100 million women were “missing” from Asia (Levy, 2007, para. 4). Many
authors also agree that the high sex ratio is due to a preference of sons (Morris, 2013,
para. 1; Baird, 2013, p. 2; Hesketh & Xing, 2006, para. 7). Studies have shown that
the desire to have sons rather than daughters is due to cultural preferences and family
traditions (Baird, 2013, p. 2). The advances in assisted reproductive technology have
raised the sex ratios in many countries around the world. The United Nations’
estimated sex ratio in 2011 for countries is displayed below (pp. 79-84):
5
GENDER SELECTION? SOUNDS MORE LIKE SEXISM
Number of males for every 100 females
Afghanistan 107 Oman
Andorra 109 Pakistan
Bahrain 167 Palau
Bangladesh 102 Peru
Bhutan 113 Qatar
Brunei 102 Samoa
Faeroe Islands 108 Saudi Arabia
Guyana 101 Solomon Islands
Jordan 106 United Arab Emirates
Kuwait 148 Western Sahara
Libya 101 World
It is evident that the Middle Eastern countries display higher sex ratios relative to
other countries that use sex selection. This trend is currently growing at an increasing
rate in many parts of the world, studies show that the sex ratio will only continue to
grow, thus, leading to the rarity of women (Baird, 2013, p.1). Beliefs on how sons are
better investments than daughters, and that women are inferior to men show how
corrupt and sexist the world still is. Furthermore, many authors and experts
specialized in sex-related studies agree that the consequences to be faced due to an
excess in the number of males are generally negative.
Arguments on the impact of GS
The high sex ratio nowadays has been associated with the increase in SS, but
recent studies have found that societies with higher ratios are also “disproportionately
violent societies” (Levy, 2007, para. 8). Violence in these societies includes a higher
tendency to engage in crimes and anti-social activities. According to Monica Sharma
6
GENDER SELECTION? SOUNDS MORE LIKE SEXISM
(2008), the author of a very interesting piece on sex selection, claims that these
unacceptable acts of violence include; rape, sex trafficking, kidnapping and war (para.
19) The effects of these crimes on society generally negative since they all result in
harm towards an innocent member of society. However, it is safe to say that a crime
still accounts for a crime regardless of how large it’s effects are on the population.
Levy (2007) believes that this is due to the association of aggression with masculinity;
this is one of the many reasons as to why we need to maintain an almost equal sex
ratio (para. 8). Having an excess of either gender will have a negative impact on
society, and in this case, the imbalance between males and females leads to an
increased crime rate. A high sex ratio shows that the effects of SS are not created
when only one family engages in the procedure, but it is when a large group of
families undergo it. This is one of the many reasons why governments all over the
world need to regulate the advances in gender-selective technologies, because parents
should not be able to easily access such operations.
One of the other impacts of sex selection is discrimination against a certain
gender (“Sex Selection and Discrimination,” n.d., para. 3). Most people residing in the
Middle East would generally agree that men are considered to be more superior than
women in this region. This mentality is also present in many Eastern Asian countries
such as India and China, however, studies have shown that there was no specific
gender being preferred in Western communities (Levy, 2007, para. 12-13).
Researches show that SS promotes discrimination, which could have many side
effects on a person’s peace of mind. When a person is constantly being treated as
mediocre, they eventually start to engage in harmful activities as a response to these
deteriorating manners. Experts have found a relation between gender discrimination
and increase levels of drug use (Rho & Choi, 2010, para. 18). A society is composed
7
GENDER SELECTION? SOUNDS MORE LIKE SEXISM
of men and women; it is impossible to have a successful society with only one gender.
The bitter feud between society and men against women must come to an end. To
create a life, a man and a woman are needed for the process. How do people expect an
expansion in population to occur if there is a limited number of women present to
carry the child?
Religious aspect of SS
The morality and ethicality of GS has caused an open-ended and undetermined
debate. Families engage in SS for many different reasons that include: family
balancing, desire for a specific sex, and to avoid gender-linked diseases. The issue of
GS can be perceived differently by many societies due to cultural differences; the
procedure’s occurrence in the Middle East has raised many people’s awareness on this
topic. Muslim scholars have spoken out about each of those reasons and they have
provided the public with the Islamic view on SS. Since there was no technology that
allowed GS when the holy Qur’an was created, the Islamic Fiqh council has set their
rules on IVF and PGD while keeping Qur’anic values in mind. They have permitted
the use IVF to take place, but only between married couples; they strictly prohibited
the following (Zahraa & Shafie, 2006, p. 162-163):
1. Fertilization of the egg of a woman with a sperm that does not belong to her
husband to be implanted in her.
2. Fertilization of the sperm of a man with an egg that does not belong to his wife
to be implanted in his wife.
3. Fertilization of the egg and a sperm of a married couple to be implanted in a
surrogate.
4. Fertilization between an unmarried couple’s egg and sperm to be implanted in
a married woman’s womb.
8
GENDER SELECTION? SOUNDS MORE LIKE SEXISM
5. Fertilization between a married couple’s egg and sperm to be implanted in a
married woman’s womb.
They have justified their reasons for these rules according to the Islamic view of
confused lineage and it’s linkage to adultery (p. 163). Due to the multiple functions of
PGD, the Islamic council has set their regulations based on the reason for it. They
have given their permission for families to use PGD to prevent gender-linked diseases
from being carried on to their unborn child (p. 164). Many experts also accept this
reason since it threatens the child’s well being. Families who face a large-scale
transmission process are usually forced to use GS as a precaution to avoid future
harm. However, the Muslim scholars have restricted the use of PGD for the use of
genetic manipulation (p. 165). They have also prohibited the use of IVF and PGD to
select a baby’s gender for any cause other than preventing a disease (p. 179). The
rules of GS have been set in terms of religion; Muslim couples should think about
whether or not conceiving a child of their desired sex is more valuable then following
their religious paths. Also, countries in the Middle East should prohibit these services
considering that Islam is the dominating religion in this region.
Counterargument on SSA
Many proponents of GS argue that it reduces the tendency to engage in sex
selective abortion (SSA) (Robertson, 2003, para. 37). SSA is defined as the procedure
that “involves the identification of the foetus’s sex during the pregnancy using pre-
natal diagnosis, followed by abortion of the foetus if it proves to be of the undesired
sex” (Saharso, 2011, p. 251). Even though sex selection may decrease the number of
abortions occurring, it does not justify either procedure since they both lack morality.
Despite the fact that SS and SSA are driven by the same force, which is the preference
9
GENDER SELECTION? SOUNDS MORE LIKE SEXISM
of a certain gender, they are still two different approaches to dealing with the same
problem. SS is a pre-natal method used in order to conceive the desired gender, while
SSA is a post-natal method that terminates the life of a foetus if it is not the preferred
sex. Relating both controversial issues is a petty excuse to undergo an operation that
promotes discrimination. Although saving the life of a foetus by changing its sex
rather than terminating its life may seem less unethical, why should families go to
such extreme measures just to obtain their desired sex? SSA is a questionable
procedure, based on ethical grounds, because it is used due to a strong preference of a
certain sex. A reduction in it is a positive effect that is resulted from sex selection, but
it is does not justify either gender-selective methods. As Thomas Stephen Szasz
(2015), a professor of psychiatry, once said, “[t]wo wrongs don't make a right, but
they make a good excuse”.
Counterargument on women’s values
Another very common claim mentioned by many supporters of sex selection
explains that the high sex ratio will increase a woman’s value. They argue that the
rarity and scarcity of women will raise their social status, thus, they will “benefit from
their enhanced value” (Hesketh & Xing, 2006, para. 21). Experts such as Neil Levy,
Therese Hesketh, Zhu Wei Xing, and many more, refuted that argument by claiming
that the scarcity of women will only increase her value as a commodity “to be traded
and to be controlled by her male relatives” (Levy, 2007, para. 7). Another expert also
argues that the decrease in women will lead to increased sex trafficking (Baird, 2013,
p. 1). All studies are in agreement to the fact that a high sex ratio will lead to a great
loss in a woman’s value in society. Also, this would promote a male dominance in
society because the lack of women will make them inferior to men. This procedure
10
GENDER SELECTION? SOUNDS MORE LIKE SEXISM
would also waste the endless efforts of many powerful woman that have worked so
much to encourage woman rights all over the world.
Counterargument on freedom
One of the main points that many people argue when it comes to banning any
action that takes place in society is freedom. Freedom is one of the many words which
holds a different meaning to whomever uses it; despite the word’s meaning to society,
the Oxford dictionary defines freedom as “[t]he power or right to act, speak, or think
as one wants” . What we, as humans, want is to have our idealistic and moral beliefs
to be implemented in society’s everyday activities; however, due to an incredibly
large amount of people, this is would be nearly impossible to achieve. After all, each
person has their own opinion on every aspect occurring, and this opinion may not
always match that of their peers or colleagues. In terms of SS, many families believe
that they should be given the right to engage in what they desire, since the matter
won’t affect anyone outside of the family (McCarthy, 2001, para. 5). The
consequence that these people usually tend to ignore is the overall effect; one family
engaging in this procedure is hardly going to affect the sex ratio, but the issue begins
when many families start to take on the trend. Everyone believes in freedom, but is it
really freedom when families engage in an action which could affect other people
later on. The negative results that arise from gender selection are quite severe, and as
previously mentioned; sex trafficking, rape, and crime rates have all increased with
the high sex ratio (Sharma, 2008, para.19). Some families may not consider these
impacts since it does not directly harm them, but at the rate of which SS is going, it is
not long before other negative impacts arise. People should start to consider the full
significance of their actions; is having a child of your preferred gender really worth
11
GENDER SELECTION? SOUNDS MORE LIKE SEXISM
unintentionally harming members of society? Should those innocent people not have
the freedom of living without an increased crime rate? When it comes to such a
controversial topic, all impacts should be accounted for when deciding whether or not
to ban this action; in this case, the negatives outweigh the positives. At the end of the
day, a family’s aim should be to have a healthy child and not a child of their desired
gender.
Conclusion
Gender selection has caused an endless debate between whether or not it
should be regulated. Based on the results showed throughout the piece, SS has many
negative impacts on society and it could lead to irrecoverable damages if families
continue using it at the current rate. The preference of sons that takes place in Middle
Eastern region, and many other countries, has pushed families to use such procedures.
Studies have shown that advances in gender-selective technologies will continue to
increase the sex ratio unless regulations are put forth. Banning sex selection all over
the world seems to be the most ideal solution, unless it was needed for a family with
sex-linked diseases. A worldwide ban would show people how severe this issue
actually is, it may even change society’s view on females. Overall, the topic deals
with many different aspects that affect any person’s daily life. These artificial
technologies are altering with the natural course of life, which is why they should be
permanently prohibited.
References
12
GENDER SELECTION? SOUNDS MORE LIKE SEXISM
Adams, S. (2012, August 28). British couples flying to US for banned baby sex
selection. The Telegraph. Retrieved from
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/9504503/British-couples-flying-
to-US-for-banned-baby-sex-selection.html
Al Hameli, A. (2014, November 25). Couples in the UAE use gender selection to
‘balance families’. The National. Retrieved from
http://www.thenational.ae/uae/health/couples-in-the-uae-use-gender-selection-
to-balance-families#page1
Baird, V. (2013). Girls not allowed. New Internationalist. (466), 12-16. Retrieved
from http://lt4tz7xl8k.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-
2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/
summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/
fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Girls+not+allowed
%3A+Vanessa+Baird+examines+what+sex+selection+is+doing+to+women--
and+the+world&rft.jtitle=New+Internationalist&rft.au=Baird
%2C+Vanessa&rft.date=2013-10-
01&rft.pub=New+Internationalist&rft.issn=0305-
9529&rft.issue=466&rft.spage=12&rft.externalDocID=346925529¶mdict
=en-US
Clarke, S. (2015, January 5). Sex selection and abortion: Canada. Library of
Congress. Retrieved from
http://www.loc.gov/law/help/sex-selection/canada.php
Gender and genetics. (n.d.). World Health Organization. Retrieved from
http://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index4.html
13
GENDER SELECTION? SOUNDS MORE LIKE SEXISM
Gender selection. (2014, November 15). Center for Human Reproduction. Retrieved
from https://www.centerforhumanreprod.com/services/infertility-treatments/
genderselection/
Gender selection. (2014, November 15). Center for Human Reproduction. Retrieved
from https://www.centerforhumanreprod.com/services/infertility-treatments/
ivf/
Gender selection. (2014, November 15). Center for Human Reproduction. Retrieved
from https://www.centerforhumanreprod.com/services/infertility-treatments/
pgd/
Gender selection. (2015, January 8). Center for Human Reproduction. Retrieved from
https://www.centerforhumanreprod.com/services/infertility-treatments/
genderselection/methods /
Hesketh, T. & Xing, Z. W. (2006). Abnormal sex ratios in human population: Causes
and consequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(36).
doi:10.1073/pnas.0602203103
Levy, N. (2007). Against sex selection. Southern Medical Journal, 100(1), 107-109.
Retrieved from http://lt4tz7xl8k.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-
2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/
summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/
fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Against+sex+selection&rft.jt
itle=Southern+Medical+Journal&rft.au=Levy%2C+Neil&rft.date=2007-01-
01&rft.pub=Southern+Medical+Association&rft.issn=0038-
4348&rft.eissn=1541-
8243&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=107&rft.externalDBID=n
%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=158957764¶mdict=en-US
14
GENDER SELECTION? SOUNDS MORE LIKE SEXISM
McCarthy, D. (2001). Why sex selection should be legal? Journal of Medical Ethics,
27(5), 302-307. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.5.302
Morris, C. (2013, October 21). A world without girls: Consequences of sex selection.
International Network for Economics and Conflict. Retrieved from
http://inec.usip.org/blog/2013/oct/21/world-without-girls-consequences-sex-
selection
Oxford dictionaries. (n.d.) Retrieved from
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/freedom
Robertson, J. A. (2003). Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: The ethical
debate. Oxford Journals, 18(3), 465-471. doi:10.1093/humrep/deg100
Rho, A., & Choi, K. H. (2010). Effects of gender discrimination and reported stress
on drug use among racially/ethnically diverse women in Northern California.
Womens Health Issues, 20(3), 211-218. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2010.02.002
Saharso, S. (2005). Sex-selective abortions. HAL Archives, 5(2), 248-266.
doi:10.1177/1468796805054297
Thomas Szasz. (2015, June 1). BrainyQuote.com. Retrieved from
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/t/thomasszas399818.html
World population prospects: The 2010 revision. (2011). United Nations. Retrieved
from http://esa.un.org/wpp/documentation/pdf/WPP2010_Volume-
I_Comprehensive-Tables.pdf
Zahraa, M. & Shafie, S. (2006). An Islamic perspective on IVF and PGD, with
particular reference to Mahdi Zahraa and Shaniza Shafie. Arab Law Quarterly,
20(2), 152-180. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.aus.edu/stable/27650544?
seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
15