The Purpose:

The goal of my research is to discover:1. Why students and teachers should use Digital

Interactive Note booking during class lectures in distance education?

2. Could this teaching method improve computerized testing scores?

Outline Topics & Subtopics

Examining the differences in examinee performance on computerized testing using digital note-booking in the classroom.

Technology Insisted Instruction

Recall study technique note-taking

Electronicnote-taking

Comparison paper pencil test and computer test

Benefits Importance Digital Notes-Taking What we already know form other research studies:

Exposure of 1hr of 3hr TEC can increase testing performance scores.

Guided learning using the combination of traditional lectures and TEC together is the most beneficial style of students learning.

Attitude and student control over learning produces positive results.

Benefits Importance Computerized-Testing

with utilizing digital note-booking.

Fast Access to Information:

Immediate Feedback

Quick & Accurate Scoring

Self Paced

Flexibility of time & location

According to Forsyth (1997),Computer based teaching methods:

1.Improve the transfer of information.

2.Increased instructional focus

3.Enhanced Motivation.

4.Stimulates creative Expression.

No dull text, because I need Vivid graphics

too!

• Which learning Style is Effective to enhance improving conceptual knowledge when testing?

BrainActivity

notes

notes

Computerized Teaching According to Forsyth,

“Skinner early vision of a teaching machine that would shape students’ behavior through reinforcement”(p.207)

Student Surveys

Questionnaire

Class and university records

VariablesLearning Outcomes

Effectiveness

http://www.cengagebrain.com/shop/content/tuckman00348_0495500348_01.01_toc.pdf

Effectiveness of Digital

Paper and Pencil Testing

Research that opposes my theory that use of digital tools more effective?

Pearson: Test, Measure, and Research Computer-Based & Paper-Pencil Test Comparability Studies http://www.pearsonassessments.com/NR/rdonlyres/93727FC9-96D3-4EA5-B807-5153EF17C431/0/Bulletin_9.pdf

& Computerized Testing

Computer Testing Associated withAnxiety

Do Digital note-booking help decrease anxiety when taking computerized tests?

Will digital note-booking in classroom decrease anxiety when taking computer formatted tests ?

Digital Tools: Enhance Digital Note-Taking

Live Binder

TK8 sticky notes software

Post-it Digital Notes

Digital Avatair

Live Scribe: Digital Pen

Turbo note

Atnotes

Time

Bridging our Future in LearningIs Digital note-booking in our future?

Computerized Testing is a fast effective academic measurement tool.

If computer-based testing is in our future, then digital note-taking skills need to be adaptive in our teaching.

References:

• Forsyth, D. R., & Archer, C. R. (1997). Technologically assisted instruction and student mastery, motivation, and matriculation. Teaching of Psychology, 24, 207–212.

• Gijlers, H. H., Saab, N. N., Van Joolingen, W. R., De Jong, T. T., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. M. (2009). Interaction between tool and talk: how instruction and tools support consensus building in collaborative inquiry-learning environments. Journal Computer Assisted Learning, 25(3), 252-267. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

• Kronzer, Nicole. (2009, July 10). Writing Digital: Teaching Poetry.[Video] Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com.

• Landrum, R. (2010). Faculty and Student Perceptions of Providing Instructor Lecture Notes to Students: Match or Mismatch? Teaching of Psychology, 37(3), 216-221. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

• Lawson, T. J., Bodle, J. H., & McDonough, T. A. (2007). Methods & Techniques: Techniques for Increasing Student Learning From Educational Videos: Notes Versus Guiding Questions. Teaching of

Psychology, 34(2), 90- 93. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Pemberton, J. R., Borrego Jr., J., & Cohen, L. M. (2006). Using Interactive Computer Technology to Enhance

Learning. Teaching of Psychology, 33(2), 145-147 .Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

References:Proserpio, L., & Gioia, D. A. (2007). Teaching the Virtual Generation. Academy of Management Learning &

Education, 6(1), 69-80. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

Rhodes, T. L. (2011). Making Learning Visible and Meaningful Through Portfolios. Change, 43(1), 6-13. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

Säljö, R. R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: technologies, social

memory and the nature of learning. Journal of Assisted Learning, 26(1), 53-64. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

Todoroki, S., Konishi, T., & Inoue, S. (2006). Blog-based research notebook: Personal informatics workbench

for high-throughput experimentation. Applied Surface Science, 252 (7), 2640-2645. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

Wang, Hong & Shin, D. (2009). Computer- Based & Paper-Pencil Test Comparability Studies. Pearson Assessment,(9), 1-6. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonassessments.com.