6
TILLAGE RESEARCH NEEDED TO REDUCE WIND EROSION E. L. Skidmore- 11 NATURE OF WIND EROSION PROBLEM Wind e r o s i o n is severe in many areas of the world and is the dominant problan on about 30 million hectares of land in the United States. On the average, about 2 million hectares are moderately to severely damaged each year. 19th century warned of impending disaster, and during the 1930's a prolonged dry spell culminated in soil destruction and disastrous dust storms on the. Great Plains (Svobida, 1940; Malin, 1946a, b, c; Johnson, 1947). Extensive soil erosion in the Great Plains during the last half of the Although generally believed to be important only in semiarid and arid areas, soil erosion by wind may occur wherever soil, vegetative, and climatic conditions are conducive. Such conditions exist wherever (1) the soil is loose, dry, and reasonably finely divided; (2) the soil surface is smooth and vegetative cover absent or sparse; (3) the field is large enough; and (4) the wind is strong enough to initiate soil movement (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1960) . Those conditions are met oftener in semiarid and arid areas where precipi- tation is inadequate or wher'e the vagaries from season to season or year to year prevent maintenance of crops or residue cover on the land. The combi- nation of conditions also occurs i n subhumid and sometimes even humid areas. Vegetable crops are often damaged on sandy soils in areas of high rainfall. Wind erosion physically removes the most fertile portion of the soil and, therefore, lowers productivity of the land (Daniel and Langham, 1936; Lyles, 1975). Blowing soil fills ditches and fence rows, blocks highways, reduces seedling survival and growth, and lowers the marketability of vegetable crops. Some soil from damaged land enters suspension and becomes part of the atmospheric dustload (Hagen and Woodruff , 1973). Dust associated with wind erosion obscures visibility, pollutes the air, causes automobile accidents, 'fouls machinery, and irritates homanakers. PAST AND PRESENT RESEARCH Numerous studies of wind erosion mechanics and control led to the develop- ment of a wind erosion equation (Chepil and Woodruff, 1963; Woodruff and Siddoway, 1965) and establishment of the following basic principles (Woodruff L'Soil scientist, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agri- culture, Manhattan, Kans.; in cooperation with the Agricultural Experiment Station, Kansas State University, Manhattan. 52

RESEARCH TO REDUCE WIND 11

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: RESEARCH TO REDUCE WIND 11

TILLAGE RESEARCH NEEDED TO REDUCE WIND EROSION

E. L. Skidmore- 11

NATURE OF WIND EROSION PROBLEM

Wind e ros ion i s severe i n many areas of t h e world and is the dominant problan on about 30 mi l l i on hec tares of land i n the United States. On the average, about 2 m i l l i o n hec ta re s are moderately to severe ly damaged each year. 19 th century warned of impending d i s a s t e r , and during the 1930's a prolonged dry s p e l l culminated i n s o i l d e s t r u c t i o n and d i s a s t r o u s d u s t storms on t h e . Great P l a i n s (Svobida, 1940; Malin, 1946a, b , c; Johnson, 1947).

Extensive s o i l e ros ion i n the Great P l a i n s dur ing t h e l a s t ha l f of t h e

Although g e n e r a l l y bel ieved t o be important only i n semiar id and a r i d areas, s o i l e r o s i o n by wind may occur wherever s o i l , vege ta t ive , and climatic condi t ions are conducive. Such condi t ions e x i s t wherever (1) t h e s o i l is loose, dry, and reasonably f i n e l y divided; (2) t h e s o i l s u r f a c e is smooth and vege ta t ive cover absent o r sparse; (3) t h e f i e l d is l a r g e enough; and (4) t h e wind is s t rong enough t o i n i t i a t e s o i l movement (Food and Agr icu l ture Organization of t h e United Nations, 1960) .

Those cond i t ions are m e t o f t ene r i n semiar id and a r i d areas where prec ip i - t a t i o n is inadequate o r wher'e t h e v a g a r i e s from season t o season o r year t o year prevent maintenance of c rops o r r e s i d u e cover on t h e land. The combi- na t ion of cond i t ions a l s o occurs i n subhumid and sometimes even humid areas. Vegetable c rops are o f t e n damaged on sandy s o i l s i n areas of high r a i n f a l l .

Wind e r o s i o n phys ica l ly removes t h e most f e r t i l e po r t ion of the s o i l and, therefore , lowers p roduc t iv i ty of t h e land (Daniel and Langham, 1936; Lyles , 1975).

Blowing s o i l f i l l s d i t ches and f ence r o w s , b locks highways, reduces seedl ing s u r v i v a l and growth, and lowers t h e marke tab i l i t y of vege tab le crops.

Some s o i l from damaged land e n t e r s suspension and becomes p a r t of the atmospheric dus t load (Hagen and Woodruff , 1973). Dust a s soc ia t ed with wind eros ion obscures v i s i b i l i t y , p o l l u t e s t h e a i r , causes automobile acc idents ,

' fou ls machinery, and i r r i t a tes homanakers.

PAST AND PRESENT RESEARCH

Numerous s t u d i e s of wind eros ion mechanics and c o n t r o l l e d t o t h e develop- ment of a wind e ros ion equation (Chepil and Woodruff, 1963; Woodruff and Siddoway, 1965) and establ ishment of t h e fol lowing bas i c p r i n c i p l e s (Woodruff

L'Soil s c i e n t i s t , Agr i cu l tu ra l Research Service, U. S. Department of Agri- c u l t u r e , Manhattan, Kans.; i n cooperat ion wi th the A g r i c u l t u r a l Experiment S t a t i o n , Kansas State Universi ty , Manhattan.

52

Page 2: RESEARCH TO REDUCE WIND 11

' and others, 1972) t o c o n t r o l wind erosion: (1) e s t a b l i s h and maintain vege- tat ive or nonvegetative land cover; (2) reduce f i e l d widths along p reva i l i ng wind d i r e c t i o n ; (3) produce s t a b l e c lods o r aggrega tes on the land sur face ; and (4) roughen t h e land, opera t ions .

Three of those p r i n c i p l e s relate d i r e c t l y t o t i l l a g e

S ince t h e va lue of r e s i d u e f o r wind e ros ion c o n t r o l w a s recognized, v a r i o u s s t u d i e s (Woodruff and o the r s , 1965a, b; Fens te r and o the r s , 1965; Woodruff and o thers , 1966; Woodruff and Chepil, 1958; Fenster and McCalla, 1970; Anderson, 1965; Anderson, 1961) have evaluated performance of t i l l a g e implements i n a stubble-mulch system.

Two types of t i l lage machines were used i n s t u b b l e mulching: (a) those t h a t stir and mix t h e s o i l , and (b) those t h a t c u t beneath the su r face without s t i r r i n g o r turning the t i l l e d layer . With e i t h e r type, t he quan t i ty of r e s i d u e conserved i s a f u n c t i o n of quant i ty , he ight , or l ength , and previous pos i t i on ing of p r e t i l l a g e res idue . than do such mixing type implements as one-way d isks .

'

Subsurface sweeps conserve more r e s i d u e

Experimental r e s u l t s show that s tubb le mulching and reduced t i l l a g e leave more r e s i d u e and l eave i t more erect than convent ional t i l l a g e does; conse- .

quent ly , providing more e f f e c t i v e wind erosion c o n t r o l (Anderson, 1961; Fens te r , 1960; Unger and o t h e r s , 1971; Woodruff and o the r s , 1965a; Schmidt and T r i p l e t t , 1967; Schmidt and Kroetz, 1969; Moldenhauer and Duncan, 1969; Duncan and Moldenhauer, 1968) ,

P a s t research on t i l l a g e t o c o n t r o l wind e r o s i o n w a s centered a t Manhattan, Kans., w i t h s c i e n t i s t s a t o the r Great P l a i n s l o c a t i o n s p a r t i c i - p a t i n g : i n Kansas (Colby, S t . John, Garden City, Hays, Tribune), Nebraska (All iance, Lincoln) , Texas (Big Spring, Bushland), and Colorado (Akron). Corn B e l t l o c a t i o n s of Ames, Iowa, and Wooster, Ohio, have contr ibuted, as has r e s e a r c h a t Swift Current, Saskatchewan. Present ARS l o c a t i o n s with support f o r wind eros ion r e s e a r c h are Manhattan, Kans., Big Spring, Tex., and Sidney, Mont., w i t h 5.2, 0.8, and 0.4 SY's respec t ive ly . S ince t i l l a g e , p a r t i c u l a r l y r e s i d u e management, p l ays such a n important r o l e i n wind eros ion con t ro l p r a c t i c e s , a po r t ion of t h e support l i k e l y i s devoted t o t i l l a g e aspects.

R E S W C H NEEDS AND APPROACHES

T i l l a g e research needs appl ied t o those p r i n c i p l e s f o r con t ro l l i ng wind e ros ion may inc lude the fol lowing object ives: (1) t o develop t i l l a g e t h a t w i l l r e c o n s t r u c t t h e f i n e s o i l p a r t i c l e s and aggregates i n t o s t a b l e aggregates l a r g e r than 1 mm b u t small enough f o r a good seedbed; (2) t o develop t i l l a g e that w i l l l e a v e a b lanket of s t a b l e c lods on t h e s u r f a c e ; (3) t o develop t i l l a g e and r e s idue management t o minimze overwinter breakdown of s o i l . aggrega tes on s o i l s s u s c e p t i b l e t o wind erosion; (4) t o optimize t i l l a g e f o r producing s o i l roughness; (5) t o develop t i l l a g e t h a t w i l l conserve and manage r e s idue f o r e ros ion c o n t r o l and m a x h u m crop y i e l d s ; (6) t o evaluate in t e r - a c t i o n between t i l l a g e and cropping h i s t o r y on s o i l phys i ca l p roper t ies , p a r t i c u l a r l y those t h a t r e l a t e t o wind e r o d i b i l i t y . Research approaches l i s t e d i n ARS Nat iona l Research Program 20800, Technical Objec t ive 2 (Wind Erosion , .) t h a t i nc lude t i l l a g e a spec t s a re :

I I I i i I

1 I

1 I

i i i

I

1 I

53

Page 3: RESEARCH TO REDUCE WIND 11

- Improve wind erosion con t ro l from crop r e s idues a f t e r t i l l a g e : Conduct n o - t i l l , minimum, and s tubb le mulching research t o determine optimum o r i e n t a t i o n of r e s idues ; develop improved he rb ic ide - t i l l age techniques , improve the r o l e of sequence and frequency of opera t ions , and improve d r i l l i n g and p l an t ing procedures.

- Improve wind e ros ion c o n t r o l from t i l l a g e manipulation of s o i l s t ruc- t u r e : Conduct r e sea rch t o eva lua te clod production c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of v a r i o u s t i l l a g e machines, determine optimum c r i t i c a l f r i c t i o n v e l o c i t y r a t i o s f o r s o i l c lods and s u r f a c e roughness and develop parameters f o r des igning machines t o provide most e f f e c t i v e s o i l s u r f a c e condi t ions , and determine f e a s i b i l i t y of t r e a t i n g c lods with chemical and p e t r o 1 eum-ba sed pr e serva t ive s t o r es is t d is i n t e g r a t i o n .

'

-- U s e landforming f o r wind e ros ion con t ro l : Determine inf luence of topography on wind e ros ion and develop engineer ing s p e c i f i c a t i o n s and des ign cr i ter ia f o r landforming t o c o n t r o l wind erosion.

-- Improve wind eros ion c o n t r o l a t t a i n a b l e from deep plowing sandy s o i l s : Conduct r e sea rch t o e s t a b l i s h minimum c l a y con ten t s a t reachable depths t o provide c o n t r o l f o r extended per iods a t reasonable cos ts .

- P r e d i c t impact of emergency t i l l a g e on t o t a l seasonal erosion: Evalua te var ious emergency t i l l a g e implements such as c h i s e l s , furrow openers, s andf igh te r s , etc. f o r e f f e c t i v e n e s s and d u r a t i o n on s o i l s of v a r i o u s t e x t u r e s and water contents .

- Preserve and extend the wind eros ion p r o t e c t i o n of crop res idues : Study b a s i c microbia l a c t i v i t y , screen and test va r ious commercial p roducts with p o t e n t i a l f o r r e s idue preserva t ion , and develop economical methods f o r us ing t h e technology.

EXPECTED BENEFITS

In Technica l Object ive 2, "Improved Wind Erosion Control t o P ro tec t Crops and Soi l s and Reduce A i r Po l lu t ion , " estimates show t h a t annual b e n e f i t s from v i s u a l i z e d technology on wind e ros ion equal $146 mi l l ion .

Monetary b e n e f i t s would accrue from reduced crop l o s s e s ; a d d i t i o n a l acreage made a v a i l a b l e f o r economic r e t u r n ; improved s o i l p r o d u c t i v i t y from lessened erosion; more n e a r l y accu ra t e c u r r e n t and f u t u r e commodity p r i c i n g because of improved accuracy i n e s t ima t ing damage and fo recas t ing food suppl ies ; reduced maintenance of roads, fences , and i r r i g a t i o n and dra inage d i t c h e s ; and reduced damage t o mechanical and electrical apparatus from dus t .

Most of t he - v i s u a l i z e d technology relates t o t i l l a g e a spec t s of wind e ros ion cont ro l .

i 7

J

Health, acc iden t prevent ion, improved environment and a e s t h e t i c f a c t o r s by reducing d u s t and a i r p o l l u t i o n would b e n e f i t 1 2 m i l l i o n people and 36 m i l - lion l i v e s t o c k i n t h e Great P l a i n s , with similar b e n e f i t s t o o the r regions where wind e ros ion i s a problem.

54

Page 4: RESEARCH TO REDUCE WIND 11

POTENTIAL FOR INTERREGI? EL EXTRAPOLATION OF NEW TECHNOLOGY I N A PREDICTIVE SENSE (MODELING)

Because a wind e r o s i o n equat ion (de t e rmin i s t i c model) a l r e a d y exists and is used ex tens ive ly , p o t e n t i a l is e x c e l l e n t f o r i n t e r r e g i o n a l e x t r a p o l a t i o n of new technology. f i n e soil p a r t i c l e s , produce a cloddy su r face , i nc rease s u r f a c e roughness, and maintain r e s idue on t h e s u r f a c e can now b e evaluated f o r wind e r o s i o n cont ro l . However, much r e s e a r c h is needed t o eva lua te t i l l a g e requirements f o r t h e sundry s o i l , c l i m a t i c , v e g e t a t i v e , and moi s tu re v a r i a b l e s .

B e n e f i t s from new t i l l a g e technology t h a t w i l l r e c o n s t r u c t

REFERENCES

Anderson, De T. 1961. Sur face t r a s h conserva t ion wi th t i l l a g e machines. Canadian J o u r n a l of Soil Science 41: 99-114.

Anderson, D. T. 1965. Some f a c t o r s a f f e c t i n g t r a s h conserva t ion wi th t h e heavy-duty c u l t i v a t o r o Canadian A g r i c u l t u r a l Engineering 7:46, 49, 56.

Chepil, We S., and Ne P. Woodruff. 1963. The phys ics of wind e r o s i o n and i t s con t ro l . Advances in Agronomy 15:211-302.

Daniel, He A., and We H. Langham. 1936. The e f f e c t of wind e r o s i o n and c u l t i v a t i o n on t h e t o t a l n i t rogen and o rgan ic matter content of s o i l s i n t h e Southern High P la ins . 28:587-596.

Jou rna l of t h e American Socie ty of Agronomy

Duncan, E. Re, and W e C. Moldenhauer. 1968. Con t ro l l i ng wind e ros ion i n Iowa. Pamphlet 432, Cooperat ive Extension Service, Iowa State Univers i ty , Ames, Iowa. 4 pages.

Fenster, C. Re 1960. S tubble mulching w i t h v a r i o u s types of machinery. Soil Science Socie ty of America Proceedings 24:518-523.

Fens te r , C. R., N. P. Woodruff, We S. Chepil, and F. H. Siddoway. 165. Per- 111. E f f e c t s formance of t i l l a g e implements i n a s t u b b l e mulch system:

of t i l l a g e sequences on r e s idues , s o i l c loddiness , weed c o n t r o l , and wheat y i e l d . Agronomy J o u r n a l 57:52-55.

Fens te r , C. Re, and T. M. McCalla. 1970. T i l l a g e p r a c t i c e s i n western Nebraska wi th a wheat-fallow r o t a t i o n . S t a t i o n B u l l e t i n 507. 20 pages.

Nebraska A g r i c u l t u r a l Experiment

Food and Agr i cu l tu re Organiza t ion of t h e United Nations. 1960. S o i l e ros ion by wind and measures for i ts c o n t r o l on a g r i c u l t u r a l lands. A g r i c u l t u r a l Development Paper Number 71.

FA0

Hagen, Le J., and Ne P. Woodruff. 1973. A i r p o l l u t i o n from dus ts torms i n t h e Great Pla ins . Atmospheric Environment 7:323-332.

Johnson, Vance. 1947, Heaven's t ab l e l and - t h e d u s t bowl s tory. F a r r a r , S t r aus , New York. Pages 155-157.

55

Page 5: RESEARCH TO REDUCE WIND 11

Lyles, Leon. 1975. Poss ib le e f f e c t s of wind eros ion on s o i l p roduct iv i ty . Jou rna l o f S o i l and Water Conservation 30:279-283.

Malin, James C. 1946a. Dust storms - p a r t one, 1850-1860. The Kansas Historical Quar te r ly 14:129-144,

Malin, James C. 1946b. Dust storms - p a r t two, 1861-1880. The Kansas H i s t o r i c a l Quar te r ly 14:265-296.

Malin, James C. 1946c, Dust storms - p a r t t h ree , 1881-1900. The Kansas H i s t o r i c a l Quar te r ly 14:391-413.

MoIdenhauer, W. C., and E. R. Duncan. 1969. P r i n c i p l e s and methods of wind e ros ion c o n t r o l i n Iowa. Spec ia l Report Number 62, Iowa S t a t e Universi ty .

Schmidt, Berlie L a , and Marion E, Kroetz. 1969. Wind e ros ion on sands with reduced t i l l a g e and crop r e s i d u e management. Workshop o n Wind Erosion Proceedings, Des Pla ines , I l l i n o i s .

North C e n t r a l Regional Pages 66-72,

Schmidt, Berlie L., and G. B. T r i p l e t t , Jr. 1967. Con t ro l l i ng wind erosion. Ohio A g r i c u l t u r a l Research and Development Center, Ohio Report 52:35-37.

Skidmore, E. L., and N. P. Woodruff. 1968. Wind e ros ion f o r c e s i n the United S t a t e s and t h e i r u s e i n p r e d i c t i n g s o i l l o s s . of Agr i cu l tu re , A g r i c u l t u r a l Handbook Number 346.

United S t a t e s Department 42 pages.

Svobida, Lawrence. 1940. A n empire of d u s t , Caxton P r i n t e r s , Limited, Caldwell, Idaho. 203 pages.

Unger, Paul W., Ronald R. Allen, and Allen F. Wiese. 1971. T i l l a g e and he rb ic ides for s u r f a c e r e s i d u e maintenance, weed c o n t r o l , and water conserva t ion , Journal of S o i l and Water Conservation 26:147-150.

Woodruff, N. P., and W. S a Chepil. 1958. Inf luence of one-way d i s k and subsurface-sweep t i l l a g e on f a c t o r s a f f e c t i n g wind eros ion . of t h e ASAE 1:81-85,

Transact ions

Woodruff, N. P., and F. H. Siddoway. 1965. A wind e ros ion equation. S o i l Science S o c i e t y o f America Proceedings 29:602-608.

Woodruff, N. P., C. Re Fens ter , W. S. Chepil , and F. H. Siddoway. Performance of t i l l a g e implements i n a s tubb le mulch system: conservat ion. Agronomy Journa l 57:45-49.

1965a. I. Residue

Woodruff, N. P., C. R. Fens ter , W. So Chepil , and F. H. Siddoway. Performance of t i l l a g e implements i n a s tubb le mulch system: on soil cloddiness,

1965b. 11. Ef fec t s

Agronomy Journa l 57 : 49-51.

t t ,

Woodruff, N. P., C. R. Fenster , W. W. Harris, and Marvin Lundquist . 1966. Stubble-mulch t i l l a g e and p l an t ing i n crop r e s i d u e i n t h e Great P la ins . Transac t ions o f the ASAE 9:849-853.

56

Page 6: RESEARCH TO REDUCE WIND 11

t

woodruff, N. P., Leon Lyles, F.H. Siddoway, and D. W. Fryrear. 1972. How t o control wind erosion. United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Information Bullet in Number 354. 22 pages.

I . .. . * . - z

57

. .. ,

. .*

, ,-.. . . ,

.. .. . .-...,. - . .

, . . - , 1 . ,. . .

. * . .

1 . 4. . ,