23
Estimating influenza and other respiratory disease burden in the Americas Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner, Sara Mirza, Po-Yung, Chen, Wilfrido A Clara, Lucinda Johnson, Rakhee Palekar, Danielle A. Iuliano, Jorge Jara, Daniel Bausch, Yeny O Tinoco, Ann Moen, Joseph Bresee, Marc-Alain Widdowson, Admission CT of SARI case-patient with influenza

respiratory disease burden in the Americas Azziz...Estimating influenza and other respiratory disease burden in the Americas Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner, Sara Mirza, Po-Yung, Chen, Wilfrido

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Estimating influenza and other

    respiratory disease burden in the

    Americas

    Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner, Sara Mirza, Po-Yung, Chen,

    Wilfrido A Clara, Lucinda Johnson, Rakhee Palekar, Danielle

    A. Iuliano, Jorge Jara, Daniel Bausch, Yeny O Tinoco, Ann

    Moen, Joseph Bresee, Marc-Alain Widdowson,

    Admission CT of SARI case-patient with

    influenza

  • • PAHO/WHO collaborations to advance:

    • Surveillance improvements and integration

    • Compliance with IHR

    • Pandemic preparedness and response

    • Partnering with sites to explore critical questions

    • Seasonality of influenza and other viruses

    • Disease and economic burden estimates

    • Seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness

    • Oseltamivir effectiveness

    Successful as a result of seven years of

    collaboration

    Influenza Division

    International

    Activities: Annual

    Report 2012

  • Surveillance improvements: the example

    of Central America

    Number of specimens

    processed and reported to

    FluNet for 7 Central

    American countries

    2004–2012

    Johnson L, Clara WA, Gambhir M, Chacón R, Marin C, Jara JH et al Changes in

    Influenza Pandemic Preparedness in Central America: Results from Evaluations

    conducted in 8 Countries between 2008 and 2012, Atlanta, GA 2013

  • Preparedness by capability improvements in eight Central American countries

    * Difference in average score between 2008

    and 2012 is statistically

    significant at p ≤ 0.05

    Johnson L, Clara WA, Gambhir M, Chacón R, Marin C, Jara JH et al Changes in

    Influenza Pandemic Preparedness in Central America: Results from Evaluations

    conducted in 8 Countries between 2008 and 2012, Atlanta, GA 2013

  • Influenza epidemic period in the tropics

    Average

    proportion of

    respiratory

    samples testing

    positive for

    influenza each

    month since the

    start of viral

    respiratory

    surveillance

    The red line indicates the average influenza proportion

    positivity for each country that when exceeded suggests the

    months of typical influenza epidemic activity

  • Influenza and other respiratory viruses

    disease and economic burden: why we care

    Public health officials triage which preventable

    public challenges cause the greatest burden :

    (e.g. relative burden of dengue vs. influenza)

    Information about burden helps officials better

    explore the potential value of interventions:

    Targeted seasonal influenza vaccine programs

    Empiric oseltamivir treatment during the season

    Hand washing and respiratory hygiene campaigns

  • Multiple methods to estimate the

    incidence of respiratory viruses Population based projects and cohorts

    Linear models using hospital discharge and

    decedent code data

    Multiplier models using:

    Surveillance sentinel site data and health

    utilization surveys

    National/subnational administrative data

  • Population based surveillance: the

    example of the Peru cohorts

    Enrolled ~10,000 persons in ~2000 households

    living in 4 diverse communities during 2009–2012

    Contacted 2–3/week to identify ILI

    Throat and nasal swabs collected from ill

    Tested for respiratory viruses through rRT-PCR

    Identified subsequent hospitalization or death

    Influenza rates = Influenza positive participants

    Person time

  • Preliminary influenza-like illness and laboratory-confirmed

    influenza incidences rates (per 1,000 person years) by year

    and study sites, Peru Influenza Cohorts, 2009–2011

    Influenza—like Illness

    2009-2011 373 ( 355 —392 ) 298 ( 282 — 316 ) 415 ( 396 —436 ) 311 ( 293 —329 ) 351 ( 342 —360 )

    Influenza (A+B)

    2009 217 ( 188 —251 ) 31 ( 20 — 48 ) 239 ( 206 —277 ) 111 ( 90 —138 ) 154 ( 141 —169 )

    2010 139 ( 122 —159 ) 114 ( 98 — 132 ) 162 ( 144 —183 ) 123 ( 107 —142 ) 135 ( 126 —144 )

    2011 26 ( 19 —35 ) 65 ( 54 — 79 ) 26 ( 19 —35 ) 58 ( 47 —72 ) 43 ( 38 —49 )

    2009-2011 112 ( 102 —122 ) 79 ( 71 — 89 ) 120 ( 110 —131 ) 96 ( 86 —106 ) 102 ( 97 —107 )

    Seek health care

    2009 119 ( 98 —145 ) 10 ( 5 — 22 ) 147 ( 121 —177 ) 46 ( 33 —64 ) 83 ( 74 —94 )

    % 55 33 61 42 54

    2010 70 ( 58 —84 ) 39 ( 30 — 50 ) 80 ( 67 —95 ) 39 ( 30 —50 ) 58 ( 52 —64 )

    % 50 34 49 32 43

    2011 10 ( 6 —17 ) 22 ( 16 — 31 ) 13 ( 8 —19 ) 23 ( 16 —32 ) 17 ( 14 —20 )

    % 39 33 49 39 39

    2009-2011 57 ( 50 —65 ) 27 ( 22 — 33 ) 65 ( 57 —73 ) 34 ( 29 —41 ) 46 ( 43 —50 )

    % 51 34 54 36 45

    Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09

    2009 215 ( 186 —249 ) 30 ( 19 — 46 ) 223 ( 191 —260 ) 104 ( 84 —130 ) 148 ( 135 —162 )

    2010 23 ( 16 —31 ) 40 ( 31 — 51 ) 15 ( 10 —23 ) 8 ( 5 —14 ) 22 ( 18 —26 )

    2011 4 ( 2 —8 ) 1 ( 0 — 5 ) 7 ( 4 —12 ) 12 ( 7 —19 ) 6 ( 4 —8 )

    2009-2011 55 ( 49 —63 ) 22 ( 18 — 28 ) 50 ( 43 —57 ) 29 ( 24 —35 ) 40 ( 37 —43 )

    Influenza A(H3N2)

    2009 2 ( 1 —9 ) 1 ( 0 — 11 ) 12 ( 6 —23 ) 3 ( 1 —11 ) 5 ( 3 —8 )

    2010 58 ( 48 —71 ) 27 ( 20 — 36 ) 96 ( 82 —112 ) 80 ( 67 —96 ) 65 ( 59 —72 )

    2011 22 ( 15 —30 ) 64 ( 53 — 78 ) 10 ( 6 —17 ) 46 ( 36 —58 ) 35 ( 30 —40 )

    2009-2011 32 ( 27 — 38 ) 38 ( 32 — 44 ) 45 ( 39 — 52 ) 51 ( 44 — 59 ) 41 ( 38 — 45 )

    Influenza B

    2009 0 — 0 — 3 ( 1 —11 ) 0 — 1 ( 0 —3 )

    2010 58 ( 48 —71 ) 47 ( 38 — 59 ) 51 ( 41 —63 ) 35 ( 27 —46 ) 48 ( 43 —54 )

    2011 1 ( 0 —4 ) 0 — 9 ( 5 —15 ) 1 ( 0 —5 ) 3 ( 2 —4 )

    2009-2011 24 ( 20 — 29 ) 19 ( 16 — 24 ) 25 ( 20 — 30 ) 15 ( 11 — 19 ) 21 ( 19 — 23 )

    Hospitalized

    2009-2011 0.5 ( 0.1 —2.0 ) 1.1 ( 0.4 — 2.8 ) 0.2 ( 0.0 —1.8 ) 1.6 ( 0.7 —3.6 ) 0.8 ( 0.5—1.4 )

    4 sites (95% CI)IncidenceStudy sites

    Lima (95% CI) Tumbes (95% CI) Madre de Dios (95% CI)Cuzco (95% CI)

    Tinoco YO, Rázuri H, Kasper MR, Romero C, Fernandez ML, Breña P, et al. Influenza in four

    ecologically distinct regions in Peru: Active household-based community cohort study. I.

    Epidemiology and regional variation in incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza, 2009-2011,

    NAMRU 6, Lima, Peru 2012

  • Population based surveillance: the

    example of Peru cohorts

    Pros Provides high quality data

    Best suited to estimate incidence

    of infections and mild illness

    Useful to estimate incidence of

    influenza, RSV, human

    metapneumovirus, etc.

    Allows investigators to assess

    secondary household transmission

    Useful to identify modifiable risk

    factors (e.g. second hand smoke)

    Excellent platform for randomized

    control trials

    Cons Expensive

    Labor intensive

    Non-sustainable

    Require IRB

    May underestimate

    hospitalizations/deaths

    Politically sensitive

  • Linear models: the Brazil example Quantify the weekly/monthly number of

    respiratory and circulatory

    death/hospitalizations

    Assess the proportion of respiratory

    samples positive for influenza and

    other viruses

    Use the non-epidemic number of

    deaths/hospitalizations and a linear

    model to predict the number expected

    during influenza epidemic

    weeks/months

    Quantify the excess respiratory and

    circulatory cases during the influenza

    season from the predicted (the number

    we may attribute to influenza)

    20000

    30000

    40000

    50000

    12 24 36 48

    Consecutive month

    Observed respiratory and cardiac hospitalizations

    Modelled respiratory and cardiac hospitalizations

    Upper 95% confidence interval of modeled hospitalizations

    Excess

  • Linear models: the Brazil example

    F. T. M. FREITAS, L. R. O. SOUZA, E. AZZIZBAUMGARTNER, P. Y. CHENG, H. ZHOU, M. A.

    WIDDOWSON, D. K. SHAY, W. K. OLIVEIRA and W. N. ARAUJO Influenza associated excess

    mortality in southern Brazil, 1980–2008. Epidemiology and Infection, Available on CJO 2012

    doi:10.1017/S0950268812002221

  • Linear models: the Brazil example

    Pros

    Does not involve field work

    Uses commonly available

    administrative data

    Simple and inexpensive

    May be used to explore rate

    ratios among demographic

    groups targeted for vaccines

    Yield similar influenza rates to

    more intensive data collection

    Cons

    Requires:

    Weekly or monthly data

    Populations > 5 million

    Time-series > 3–5 years

    Defined epidemic periods

    Stable data collection

    Difficult to disaggregate

    excess attributable to RSV

    Not useful to assess

    ambulatory influenza illness

    necessary for economic

    burden

  • Multiplier model using influenza sentinel sites and

    health utilization survey: the El Salvador example

    Add number of severe acute respiratory infections

    identified through the PAHO/CDC influenza

    surveillance at sentinel hospitals per month (Ck)

    Estimate the proportion of case-patients testing

    positive for influenza per month (p/t)

    Conduct a health utilization survey to assess

    proportion in catchment with ILI subsequently

    hospitalized at sentinel vs. other sites (u)

    Divide by catchment census population (P) and adjust

    for SARI sampling proportion (S)

    yy

    kk

    Pus

    cdecember

    januarykt

    p

    ISARI/severe pneumonia, y =

  • Multiplier model using influenza sentinel sites and

    health utilization survey: the El Salvador example Estimation components 2008 2009 2010 Total

    Case-patients identified at the sentinel site, No.* 495 1367 692 2554

    Case-patients who were tested for respiratory viruses, No. 153 217

    238

    608

    Case-patients who tested (+) for Flu, No.(%) [95% IC]† 11 (7) [3–11] 21 (10) [6–14] 5 (2) [0.2–4] 37 (6) [4–8]

    Influenza-associated case-patients [imputed data], No. 33 165 14 212

    aCensus population aged < 5 years of catchment area, No.

    36,858

    37,016

    37,205 111,079

    bCensus population that utilizes the sentinel site when ill, (%) 63 63 63 63

    cDays when surveillance was carried out, No./365 (%) 343/365 (94) 340/365 (93) 339/365 (93) 1022/1095 (93)

    Adjusted census population, person-years 21,827 21,688 21,798 65,081

    Incidence rate, cases per 1,000 person-years (95% CI)†† 1.5 (1–2) 7.6 (6.5–8.9) 0.65 (0.3–1) 3.2 (2.8–3.7)

    Clara A, Armero J, Rodriguez D, Lozano C, Bonilla L, Minaya P et al. Influenza-associated severe

    pneumonia rates in children younger than 5 years in El Salvador, 2008–2010. WHO Bulletin, In

    press. Available at http://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/11-098202.pdf

    http://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/11-098202.pdfhttp://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/11-098202.pdfhttp://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/11-098202.pdf

  • Multiplier model using influenza sentinel sites and

    health utilization survey: the El Salvador example

    Pros Leverages routine influenza

    surveillance data

    Readily provides numerator data from

    health seekers

    Useful to estimate incidence of

    influenza, RSV, human

    metapneumovirus, etc.

    May be used to explore rate ratios

    among demographic groups targeted

    for vaccines

    Yields similar influenza rates to more

    intensive data collection methods

    Cons Requires sufficient:

    Weekly case-patients

    Respiratory sampling by

    age strata

    Stable data collection

    Health utilization surveys:

    Logistically complex

    Labor intensive

    Sentinel data prone to magnify

    imprecisions when projected

    nationally

  • Multiplier model using administrative data and viral

    surveillance: the Costa Rica example

    Identify national hospital discharge diagnostic data

    Quantify the number of respiratory discharges per

    week and age group

    Identify routine influenza viral surveillance data

    Estimate the proportion of patients testing positive for

    influenza per week and their 95% confidence interval

    Use census population as denominator

  • Influenza-associated hospitalizations for respiratory

    illnesses in Costa Rica during 2005–2011

    Year Age group Hospitalizations for

    respiratory illness

    Proportion of

    influenza positive

    samples (%)

    Influenza-associated

    hospitalizations for

    respiratory illness a

    Person-years

    b

    Influenza -associated

    hospitalization for

    respiratory illness

    rate per 100,000

    person-years a

    2006c

  • Respiratory syncytial virus-associated hospitalizations for

    respiratory illnesses in Costa Rica during 2005–2011

    Guzman G, Clara AW, Garcia A, Quesada F, Palekar R, Schneider E, Peret T et al. Influenza

    testing through immunofluorescence and polymerase chain reaction. Influenza and respiratory

    syncytial virus-associated hospitalizations and deaths in Costa Rica, during 2005–2011. San Jose

    Costa Rica, 2013.

    Year Age group Hospitalizations for

    respiratory illness

    Proportion of

    respiratory

    syncytial virus

    positive samples

    (%)

    Respiratory syncytial

    virus-associated

    hospitalizations for

    respiratory illness a

    Person-years

    b

    Respiratory syncytial

    virus-associated

    hospitalization for

    respiratory illness

    rate per 100,000

    person-years a

    2005

  • Pros

    Leverages administrative data and

    viral influenza surveillance data

    Inexpensive and easy to do

    (i.e. no field work)

    Useful to estimate incidence of

    influenza, RSV, human

    metapneumovirus, etc.

    May be used to explore rate ratios

    among groups targeted for vaccines

    Yields similar influenza rates to more

    intensive data collection methods

    Cons Requires sufficient:

    Weekly viral data

    Stable data collection

    Respiratory cases are not

    necessarily those sampled:

    Prone to bias because of the

    potential differences in influenza proportion positivity among diagnosed

    and sampled:

    Age and sex distribution

    Severity of illness

    Health seeking patterns

    Multiplier model using administrative data and viral

    surveillance: the Costa Rica example

  • AMRO countries that have or intend to publish influenza rates Published

    Mortality :

    Argentina

    Brazil

    Mexico

    Hospitalization

    Argentina

    El Salvador

    Mexico

    Outpatient illness

    Argentina

    Guatemala

    Ongoing Mortality –all AMRO

    Hospitalization

    Belize

    Brazil

    Costa Rica

    Guatemala

    Honduras

    Panama

    Paraguay

    Peru

    Outpatient illness

    Costa Rica

    Ecuador

    Guatemala

    Nicaragua

    Peru

    Po-Yung Cheng

    modeling of

    influenza mortality

    burden

  • Conclusion and recommendations

    Multiple methods to leverage existing data to estimate

    influenza and other virus burden

    Consider using multiple methods

    WHO burden guidelines will soon be released

    Fully operationalize and audit PAHO ILI and SARI

    surveillance guidelines to better:

    Comply with IHR and rapidly identify novel strains

    Inform vaccine composition

    Estimate:

    Respiratory influenza RSV, human metapneumovirus burden

    Estimate direct and indirect cost of in and outpatient care

    Vaccine coverage, effectiveness and value

    Model potential value of empiric seasonal antiviral treatment

  • Gracias Alexander Klimov

    Alba Maria Ropero

    Ana María Cabrera

    Ana Balanzat

    Ann Moen

    Anna Brinkley

    Anthony Mounts

    Clarisa Baez

    Carolyn Bridges

    Dan Bausch

    Felipe Freitas

    Elena Sarrouf

    Elena Pedroni

    Horacio Echenique

    Jackie Katz

    Joel Montgomery

    Jorge Jara

    Joseph Bresee

    Mauricio Cerpas

    Meg McCarron

    Marc-Alain Widdowson

    Nancy Cox

    Natalia Blanco

    Nivaldo Linares Perez

    Otavio Oliva

    Osvaldo Uez

    Percy Minaya

    Rafael Chacón

    Rakhee Palekar

    Ricardo Cortez-Alcala

    Romina Cuezzo

    Rogelio Cali

    Steve Lindstrom

    Thais dos Santos

    Tomas Rodriguez

    Wanderson Oliveira

    Wilfrido Clara

    México Dirección General de Epidemiología