Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Response from College of Education & Human Sciences Student Teaching Instrument Teacher Candidate Summative
Evaluation for the 2014-2015 Academic Year on Instructional Enactment (Item 3—Table 10A).
Table 10A
Item 3: Instructional Enactment
2014-2015
Subject Area Scoring
Year # Item Endorsement Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Grand
Total
2014-
2015
3 Demonstrates
Capacity to
implement,
modify, and
adapt plans
that are
responsive to
students and
curricular goals
Early
Childhood
Education
0 0% 5 10.2% 44 89.8% 49
Elementary
Education
0 0% 8 6.4% 117 93.6% 125
Secondary
Education
1 0.8% 12 10.0% 107 89.2% 120
Special
Education
1 2.0% 5 10.0% 44 88.0% 50
Response from College of Education & Human Sciences Student Teaching Instrument Teacher Candidate Summative
Evaluation for the 2015-2016 Academic Year on Responsive Teaching (Item 5—Table 10B)—LIVETEXT version.
Table 10B
Item 5: Responsive Teaching
2015-2016
Subject Area Scoring
Year # Item Endorsement Unacceptable Emergent Sufficient Advanced Grand
Total
2015-
2016
5 Responsive
Teaching:
Skillfully
implements
Early Childhood Education
0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9 26.47% 25 73.53% 34
lessons that are
flexible and
intentional to
meet individual
student needs
Elementary Education
0 0.00% 2 1.08% 58 31.35% 125 67.57% 185
Secondary Education
0 0.00% 6 6.90% 38 43.68% 43 49.43% 87
Special Education
0 0.00% 1 1.16% 24 27.91% 61 70.93% 86
Responses from First Year Administrator Survey: Items Related to Student Development, Learning Differences, and
Learning Environments: Learning Differences (Standards 2.1 and 2.2).
Table 12
Standards 2.1 and 2.2: Learning Differences
Indicator Endorsement Rare Occasional Frequent Consistent
Grand
Information
Total
2.1 The
teacher
understands
individual
differences
and diverse
cultures and
communities
2014-2015
Early Childhood 0.00% 0.00% 4 57.14% 42.86% 7
Elementary 0.00% 4 6.45% 27 43.55% 4 50.00% 62
Middle Grades 0.00% 0.00% 2 50.00% 50.00% 4
Content (Subject
Area)
Endorsements 0.00% 6 10.17% 18 30.51% 6 59.32% 59
Special Education 0.00% 0.00% 6 35.29% 64.71% 17
Total 0.00% 10 6.71% 57 38.26% 10 55.03% 149
2015-2016 Rare Occasional Frequent Consistent Total
Early Childhood 0.00% 0.00% 2 0.00% 2 0.00% 4 Elementary 1 1.89% 5 9.43% 14 26.42% 33 62.26% 53
Middle Grades 0.00% 0.00% 1 100.00% 0.00% 1
Content (Subject Area) Endorsements
0.00% 7 10.14% 25 36.23% 37 53.62% 69
Special Education 0.00% 1 5.00% 7 35.00% 12 60.00% 20
Total 1 0.68% 13 8.84% 49 33.33% 84 57.14% 147
2.2 The
teacher
ensures
inclusive
learning
environments
that enable
each student
to meet high
demands
2014-2015 Rare Occasional Frequent Consistent Total
Early Childhood 0.00% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 5 71.43% 7
Elementary 0.00% 3 4.84% 23 37.10% 36 58.06% 62
Middle Grades 0.00% 1 25.00% 0.00% 3 75.00% 4
Content (Subject
Area)
Endorsements 0.00% 3 5.08% 24 40.68% 32 54.24% 59
Special Education 1 5.88% 2 11.76% 4 23.53% 10 58.82% 17
Total 1 0.67% 10 6.71% 52 34.90% 86 57.72% 149
2015-2016 Rare Occasional Frequent Consistent Total Early Childhood 0.00% 0.00% 2 0.00% 2 0.00% 4
Elementary 1 1.89% 6 11.32% 19 35.85% 27 50.94% 53
Middle Grades 0.00% 0.00% 1 100.00% 0.00% 1 Content (Subject Area) Endorsements
0.00% 5 7.25% 26 37.68% 38 55.07% 69
Special Education 0.00% 1 5.00% 5 25.00% 14 70.00% 20
Total 1 0.68% 12 8.16% 53 36.05% 81 55.10% 147
Responses from First Year Candidate Survey: Items Related to Student Learning: Understands How Learners Learn
(Item 3), and Adapts to Developmental Strategies of Learners (Item 4).
Table 14
Item 3: Understands How Learners Learn
Year # Item Endorsement Strongly
Disagree
Disagree Neither
Agree nor
Disagree
Agree Strongly
Agree
Grand
Total
2014
-
2015
3 I positively
impact the
learning and
development
of all students.
Early
Childhood
Education
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 7 58.3% 5 41.7% 12
Elementary
Education
0 0% 1 2.0% 0 0% 22 44.9% 26 53.1% 49
Secondary
Education
0 0% 0 0% 3 6.1% 26 53.1% 19 38.8% 48
Special
Education
0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 10 47.6% 11 52.4% 21
2015-
2016
3 I positively
impact the
learning and
development
of all students.
Early Childhood Education
0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 6 75.00% 8
Elementary Education
0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 10.00% 21 42.00% 24 48.00% 50
Secondary Education
0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10 16.13% 33 53.23% 19 30.65% 62
Special Education
0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 4.55% 11 50.00% 10 45.45% 22
Table 15
Item 4: Adapts to Developmental Strategies of Learners
Year # Item Endorsement Strongly
Disagree
Disagre
e
Neither
Agree nor
Disagree
Agree Strongly
Agree
Grand
Total
2014
-
2015
4 I adapt to different
developmental
stages of learners.
Early
Childhood
Education
0 0% 0 0% 1 8.3% 8 66.7
%
3 25.0
%
12
Elementary
Education
0 0% 0 0% 4 8.2% 2
2
44.9
%
23 46.9
%
49
Secondary
Education
0 0% 0 0% 9 18.4% 2
9
59.2
%
11 22.4
%
49
Special
Education
0 0% 0 0% 2 9.5% 1
0
47.6
%
9 42.9
%
21
2015
-
2016
4 I adapt to different
developmental
stages of learners
Early Childhood Education
0 0.00%
0 0.00%
0 0.00% 3 37.50%
5 62.50%
8
Elementary Education
0 0.00%
0 0.00%
8 16.00% 20
40.00%
22 44.00%
50
Secondary Education
0 0.00%
0 0.00%
17
27.87% 31
50.82%
13 21.31%
61
Special Education
0 0.00%
0 0.00%
1 4.55% 10
45.45%
11 50.00%
22
Response from College of Education & Human Sciences Student Teaching Instrument Teacher Candidate Summative
Evaluation for the 2014-2015 Academic Year on the Learning Environment (Item 3)
Table 17A
Item 3: Instructional Enactment
2014-2015
Subject Area Scoring
Year # Item Endorsement Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Grand
Total
2014-
2015
3 Demonstrates
Capacity to
implement,
modify, and
adapt plans
that are
responsive to
students and
curricular
goals
Early Childhood
Education
0 0% 5 10.2% 44 89.8% 49
Elementary
Education
0 0% 8 6.4% 117 93.6% 125
Secondary
Education
1 0.8% 12 10.0% 107 89.2% 120
Special
Education
1 2.0% 5 10.0% 44 88.0% 50
Response from College of Education & Human Sciences Student Teaching Instrument Teacher Candidate Summative
Evaluation on Planning for Learning for the 2015-2016 Academic Year on Responsive Teaching (Item 5—Table 17B)—
LIVETEXT version.
Table 17B
Item 5: Responsive Teaching
2015-16
Subject Area Scoring
Year # Item Endorsement Unacceptable Emergent Sufficient Advanced Grand
Total
2015-
2016
5 Responsive
Teaching:
Skillfully
implements
lessons that are
flexible and
intentional to
meet individual
student needs
Early Childhood Education
0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9 26.47% 25 73.53% 34
Elementary Education
0 0.00% 2 1.08% 58 31.35% 125 67.57% 185
Secondary Education
0 0.00% 6 6.90% 38 43.68% 43 49.43% 87
Special Education
0 0.00% 1 1.16% 24 27.91% 61 70.93% 86
Response from College of Education & Human Sciences Student Teaching Instrument Teacher Candidate Summative
Evaluation for the 2014-2015 Academic Year on Instructional Enactment (Item 3—Table 28A).
Table 28A
Item 3: Instructional Enactment
2014-2015
Subject Area Scoring
Year # Item Endorsement Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Grand
Total
2014-
2015
3 Demonstrates
Capacity to
implement,
modify, and
adapt plans
that are
responsive to
students and
curricular
goals
Early Childhood
Education
0 0% 5 10.2% 44 89.8% 49
Elementary
Education
0 0% 8 6.4% 117 93.6% 125
Secondary
Education
1 0.8% 12 10.0% 107 89.2% 120
Special
Education
1 2.0% 5 10.0% 44 88.0% 50
Response from College of Education & Human Sciences Student Teaching Instrument Teacher Candidate Summative
Evaluation on Planning for Learning for 2015-2016 Academic Year on Responsive Teaching (Item 5—Table 28B)—
LIVETEXT version.
Table 28B
Item 5: Responsive Teaching
2015-2016
Subject Area Scoring
Year # Item Endorsement Unacceptable Emergent Sufficient Advanced Grand
Total
2015-
2016
5 Responsive
Teaching:
Skillfully
implements
lessons that are
flexible and
intentional to
meet individual
student needs
Early Childhood Education
0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9 26.47% 25 73.53% 34
Elementary Education
0 0.00% 2 1.08% 58 31.35% 125 67.57% 185
Secondary Education
0 0.00% 6 6.90% 38 43.68% 43 49.43% 87
Special Education
0 0.00% 1 1.16% 24 27.91% 61 70.93% 86
