Upload
vuongduong
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Response of Oil Sands DerivedFuels in Diesel HCCI Operation
Bruce G. Bunting
senior staff scientist
Fuels, Engines, and Emissions Research Center
2007 DOE DEER Conference
Sponsored by DOE FCVT, Fuels Technology Program DOE team: Steve Goguen, Kevin Stork, Dennis Smith
Managed by UT-Battellefor the Department of Energy
Oil sands derived fuels: close to home, large supplycompatible with petroleum infrastructuresome chemistry differences
• OUTLINE OF TALK – 2006 vision – Advanced characterization – down to molecular level • how far do we need to go?
– HCCI engine – Fuel performance effects • different chemistry • new opportunities / potential problems?
– Conclusions – Future plans • (We are not done yet!)
2 Managed by UT-Battellefor the Department of Energy 2007 DOE DEER Conference
3 Managed by UT-Battelle
for the Department of Energy 2007 DOE DEER Conference
DEER 2006 vision
Ken Mitchell, Royal Dutch Shell
CO-INVESTIGATORS
Fuels
• Fuels have specifications – Cetane, octane, distillation, vapor pressure, flash point,
stability, etc. • And simple chemistry
– Sulfur, aromatics, olefins • And more chemistry • And are eventually mixtures of individual molecules
– How far do you need to go to control manufacturing and quality?
– How far do you need to go to understand and optimize?
4 Managed by UT-Battellefor the Department of Energy 2007 DOE DEER Conference
Oil sands fuels and refinery intermediates • Provided by Shell Canada (now Royal Dutch Shell) • 17 fuels and refinery intermediates derived from oil sands crude
– Both coker and hydrocracker upgrading – 33 to 55 cetane – 196 to 336 °C T50 – Diverse chemistry • 3 to 20% normal paraffins • 8 to 19% iso paraffins • 41 to 63% cyclo paraffins • 15 to 38% aromatics, • 0 to 2% olefins
• Majority treated to ultra low sulfur specs – good looking, good smelling – not your father’s oil sands fuels
5 Managed by UT-Battellefor the Department of Energy 2007 DOE DEER Conference
HC types, molecular weight, polarity M
OR
E PO
LAR
Æ
seco
ndar
y re
tent
ion
time,
sec
onds
4
439 by HC type, 2D GCMS
3
3.5
iso-p normal-p cyclo-p olefin aromatic
2.5
2
1.5 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
primary retention time, seconds
Å C8 -- CARBON NUMBER -- C27 Æ
6000
6 Managed by UT-Battellefor the Department of Energy 2007 DOE DEER Conference
AROM
ATIC
S
CYCL
OPARA
FFIN
S
OLEFI
NS
PARA
FFIN
S
I
……
.E
VY
Variations on 2D-GCMS spectra
FUEL 606 FUEL 444 FUEL 530 FUEL 438 GOOD ISFC GOOD ISFC POOR ISFC POOR ISFC LOW CETANE MID CETANE HIGH CETANE LOW CETANE LOW T50 MID T50 MID T50 HIGH T50
LGH
A
POLAR
T
H
NON-POLAR 7 Managed by UT-Battelle
for the Department of Energy 2007 DOE DEER Conference
HCCI engine
• Defined here as fully premixed, dilute combustion with ignition initiated kinetically near top of compression stroke
• Advantages – Potential for more efficient combustion – Low NOx and low smoke – Simple platform for fuels research
• Same chemistry processes occur in low NOx LTC or PCCI engines, but more mixed up in time and space
8 Managed by UT-Battellefor the Department of Energy 2007 DOE DEER Conference
ORNL HCCI research engine MODIFIED PISTON WITH SPHERICAL
COMBUSTION BOWL
INTAKE AIR HEATER
ATOMIZING INJECTOR
ENGINE
BELT DRIVE
CONSTANT SPEED MOTORING DYNO
30 - 400 Intake Air Temperature (°C) 20Exhaust Valve Closing (CA deg) 499Exhaust Valve Opening (CA deg) 218Intake Valve Closing (CA deg) 710Intake Valve Opening (CA deg)
10.5:1 Compression Ratio 7.0Stroke (cm) 9.7Bore (cm)
517Engine Displacement (cc)
9 Managed by UT-Battellefor the Department of Energy 2007 DOE DEER Conference
HCCI engine behavior
• A fuel produces ISFC and combustion trade-offs as a function of combustion phasing
• A collection of fuel and engine characteristics determines where optimum occurs
• Hence, the fuel story also depends on the engine story
10 Managed by UT-Battellefor the Department of Energy
Power output and economy
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
355 360 365 370 375
MFB50, atdc
ISFC
, gm
/kw
-hr
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
IMEP
, bar
ISFC
IMEP
2007 DOE DEER Conference
Emissions
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
355 360 365 370 375
MFB50, atdc
NO
X pp
m
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
HC
and
CO
ppm
NOX
HC
CO
MFB50, deg.CA
ISFC
, gm
/kw
-hr
Oil sands fuels showed both enginespecific and fuel specific trends
↑ FUEL SPECIFIC
↓ ENGINE SPECIFIC
2007 DOE DEER Conference
10.5 gm/min fuel rate
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
360
380
400
350 355 360 365 370 375 380
f438 f439 f440 f441 f444 f445 f446 f447 f480 f481 f482 f483 f530 f531 f605 f606 f607
COMBUSTION PHASING, MFB50
TDC
->
ISFC
, gm
/kw
hr
11 Managed by UT-Battellefor the Department of Energy
MFB50, deg.CA
NO
x pp
m
Ability to advance timing limited by NOx,dP/dCA, peak pressure, noise, etc.
NOx at 10.5 gm/min fuel rate
0
50
100
150
200
250
345 350 355 360 365 370 375 380
f438 f439 f440 f441 f444 f445 f446 f447 f480 f481 f482 f483 f530 f531 f605 f606 f607
NO
x, p
pm
COMBUSTION PHASING, MFB50
12 Managed by UT-Battellefor the Department of Energy 2007 DOE DEER Conference
MFB50
CO
ppm
f445f446f447f480f481f482f483f530f531f605f606f607bp15
MFB50
HC
ppm
Ability to retard timing limited bymisfire, high CO, high HC, high COV
13 Managed by UT-Battellefor the Department of Energy 2007 DOE DEER Conference
CO ppm vs. MFB50 at 10.5 gm/min fuel rate
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
350 355 360 365 370 375 380
f438 f439 f440 f441 f444
CO
, ppm
COMBUSTION PHASING, MFB50
HC ppm at 10.5 gm/min fuel rate
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
345 350 355 360 365 370 375 380
f438 f439 f440 f441 f444 f445 f446 f447 f480 f481 f482 f483 f530 f531 f605 f606 f607 bp15
HC
, ppm
COMBUSTION PHASING, MFB50
Best achievable ISFC shows correlation to cetane and T50
45 50 55 60 65
Best ISFC vs. T50 R2 = 0.658
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340
T50 distillation temperature, deg.C
best ISFC vs. cetane
R2 = 0.6142
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
30 35 40
best
ISFC
best
ISFC
cetane number
But, don’t forget that in real fuels,
cetane and T50 also correlate to energy content
and % aromatics and % heavy aromatics and
density and other chemistries and etc.
14 Managed by UT-Battellefor the Department of Energy 2007 DOE DEER Conference
0180
tem
pera
ture
, deg
.K
Higher cetane fuels show easier ignition,more low temperature heat release
calculated in-cylinder temperature histories
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
225 270 315 360 405 450 495 540
CA degree
530-60.2 446-52.9 439-35.5
Lower starting temperature required for
higher cetane
Main combustion
starts at ~ same temp. for all
fuels
LTHR boosts temperature for
high cetane fuels up to 100 K
332 1782140.716060.2 319 8641935.720452.9 279 4637532.925035.5
ISFC gm/kwhrCO ppmNOx ppm A/F INTAKE
deg.CCETANE
AT CONSTANT MFB50 = ~ 360 deg.CA
CYL
IND
ER T
EMPE
RA
TUR
E, d
eg.K
TDC 15 Managed by UT-Battelle
for the Department of Energy 2007 DOE DEER Conference
Summary
• Fuel characterization can be carried down to detailed molecular level
• Lower cetane and lower T50 provided better performance in our engine, with these fuels
• Higher cetane promotes easier ignition, more low temperature heat release
• Trends uncovered are similar to those uncovered with conventional diesel fuels
• Detailed chemistry effects still to be analyzed for
16 Managed by UT-Battellefor the Department of Energy 2007 DOE DEER Conference
Now what?
• Collaboration is continuing – NCUT, CANMET, PNNL, ORNL, Royal Dutch Shell – Add other companies, labs, universities
• Resolve various analytical methods • Deeper dive into performance – beyond cetane and distillation
– Detailed chemistry effects, statistical analysis • Confirm and broaden results
– New set of refinery based fuels and intermediates – Doping with surrogate compounds (if appropriate) – Extend to oil shale, FT, biodiesel
• Provide information which could be used to support refinery process development or fuel specification decisions
17 Managed by UT-Battellefor the Department of Energy 2007 DOE DEER Conference