Upload
latisha-walker
View
225
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/11/2019 Response to Berman
1/9
MI
N
TZ
EV
I
N
Bridge
t
M
ohd
e
212 692
688
3
bm
rohde
@mint
z.com
A
ugus
t
25
,
2014
B
y hand
and EC
F
T
he
Hon
orabl
e Ric
hard
M
er
man
Uni
ted
S
tates
D
istric
t
Ju
dge
Sou
thern
Dist
rict o
fNewY
ork
Da
niel Pa
trick
Moyn
ihan Cou
rthou
se
5
00
ear
l
S
treet
New
Y
ork,
New
York
1
0007
C
hrysle
r Cen
ter
666
Thir
d
Avenu
e
N
ew
York,
Y
1
0017
212-9
35-300
0
21
2-983-
3115fax
w
ww.min
tz.co
m
Re
:Un
ited St
ates v.
D
istric
t
Co
uncil
,
et a
l. 9
Civ. 5
722
RNIB
)
De
ar Jud
ge
Berm
an:
We write
in
res
ponse
to
th
e Co
urt's
Ord
er da
ted
J
uly
2
5, 2
014,
i
ssuedf
ollow
ing
t
he
S
econd
Circ
uit's
Sum
mary
O
rder
d
ated
Ju
ly
23,
2014
i
n thi
s
m
atter.
Th
e
Ci
rcuit
va
cated
the
Co
urt's
deci
sion
of
O
ctobe
r23,
2
012
upho
lding
th
e Revie
w
O
ffice
r's
veto
o
f
a
trick
Ne
eand
Lev
y Me
ssinet
ti as
offic
ers a
nd
deleg
ates o
f Local
157
and
re
mande
d th
e
matt
er
f
orf
urthe
r
proceedings.
We
write
specifically
to
address
the issues
identified
by
the
Court
in
it s
July
25
Orde
r,i.
e.
w
heth
er
the i
ssues ra
ised
b
y Mess
rs. N
eeand
M
essin
etti in
th
eir Ju
ly
2
012
appli
catio
ns rema
in
ripe
for
con
sidera
tion and
whe
ther
th
e
RO'
s June
26,
20
12 N
otice
of
Vet
o
was
wi
thin his auth
ority
unde
r
the
J
une
2010
St
ipulat
ion
a
nd
Orde
r,
ith cit
ationt
o a
ppropr
iate
bac
kgrou
nd,
ont
ext,and a
uthor
ity w
hich
may hel
p tor
esolv
e
an
y
'a m
bigui
ty' p
ercei
ved by
the
Seco
ndCi
rcuit
.
We
espec
tfully
submi
t
t
hat
in
veto
ing Messr
s.Ne
e
a
nd
Mes
sinett
i asLoc
al
157
elect
ed
o
fficia
ls
th
e
Re
view
Offi
cer
exerci
sed
a
uthor
ity
gr
anted
b
y
the
te
rms
of
para
graph
5.
b of
the
Stipu
lation
and
Ord
eran
d cons
istent
w
ith
the inte
nt o
fh
e
partie
sto
the Stip
ulatio
n
an
d
Orde
r.
R
egard
ing
ripene
ss,
w
enotethat
ther
eha
ve
b
een
Loca
l 15
7
electi
ons in
the
two
-yea
rss
ince
M
intz,
ev
in,
Cohn
,er
ris, Gl
ovsky
an
d
Pope
o,
.C.
B
OSTON
WASHI
NGTON
N
EW
Y
ORK
S
T MFOR
D Los
A
NGELES
PA
LO
ALTO
SAN D
IEGO LOND
ON I
SRAEL
8/11/2019 Response to Berman
2/9
8/11/2019 Response to Berman
3/9
M
intz,
evin
,
C
ohn,
erris,
G
lovsk
y a
nd
P
opeo
, .
C.
Augus
t 25,
2014
Page
In
t
he
ti
me sin
ce
the Revi
ewOf
ficer
veto
ed them
fro
m
the
pos
itions
the
y
held
on
June
26,2012,
Local
157
has
conducted
a number
of
lections.
t
held
a
February
20,
2013
election
to
fi
ll
theirpositi
ons,
a
lthou
gh Messr
s.Ne
e
a
nd
Mess
inett
i di
d
not
run
in
t
hat
el
ection
.Mes
srs. N
ee
a
nd
Mesine
tti d
id run in
sub
seque
nt
elect
ions.
n J
une 1
9, 20
13,
Loc
al 157
h
eld
a
r
egula
r
el
ection
fo
r de
legat
es and
M
essrs
. Ne
e
an
d
Mes
sinet
ti r
an
and
won.
I
n
Feb
ruary
2
014,
th
at
elect
ion was
re
-run fo
r a
reaso
n havi
ng to
do
with
the
eligi
bility
of
ano
ther me
mber
) and
Mess
rs. N
eeand
M
essin
etti ag
ain
ran for
,
a
nd
wer
eele
cted as
, dele
gates
.
nJun
e 19,
2014,
Lo
cal 1
57
he
ld
a
re
gular
el
ection
fo
r o
fficer
s, the
trialcom
mitt
eeand
one
vac
ant
del
egate
spot
.
Mr.
Mes
sinet
ti r
an to
b
e
a
truste
e and wo
a
nd M
r. N
ee
ran to
be
fi
nancia
l
se
creta
ry and
lost
B
oth
Messr
s.Ne
e and
Mes
sinet
ti
cu
rrentl
y
re
main
in
place
as
de
legat
es.
See
Wal
sh De
clarat
ion
at
t 9
.
In
short,
not on
ly
hasLoc
al
157
hel
d electi
ons for
t
he
pos
itions
in
qu
estio
n
sin
ce th
e
Review
Officer s vetoes,
but Messrs.
Nee
and
Messinetti
have
participated
in the
election
proc
ess and w
o
elect
ive
offic
e. The
y have
n
o
benef
it to
gai
n
by lit
igatin
gthe Revi
ew
Office
r s
ve
to a
uthor
ity
a
nd
thus have
no leg
ally c
ogniz
able cl
aim.
We
hus
r
espect
fully su
bmit
tha
t
th
ere
is
no
u
sticia
ble
contro
versy
for
the Cour
to
dec
ide.
B.
T
he
Vet
o
Aut
horit
y
u
ndert
he St
ipulat
ion and
Orde
r
The
Rev
iew O
ffice
r,
of
ourse
,
is
n
ota p
arty
to
th
e Sti
pulat
ion
a
nd
Or
der.
How
ever,
s
th
e
Cour
t-app
ointe
d offi
cer e
xercis
ing
th
e
a
uthor
ity provi
ded by
the
St
ipulat
ion and
Order
sin
ce
it sin
cepti
on,he
is
full
y
fa
miliar
w
ith
i
ts
ter
ms; belie
ves h
e
u
nders
tands
the p
arties
i
ntent
wit
h
respec
t
to
th
ose
term
s, based
o
nh
is
int
eract
ions
with
th
em
a
nd
th
eir react
ion
or
lack
th
ereof
)
to
8/11/2019 Response to Berman
4/9
Mint
z,
evin,
Cohn
, err
is Glo
vsky
and
P
opeo
,
.C
.
Au
gust
2
5,
2014
Pa
ge
h
is
exe
rcise
o
fh
e
ve
to
autho
rityi
n pa
rticu
lar;an
d
str
ives
to
ser
vein fa
ithfu
l c
onfor
mity
to
the
le tter
and
the
spirit
of
he
Stipulation
and
Order.
SeeWalsh
Declaration.
1.
The
Four
C
orne
rs of
heStipu
latio
n
and
O
rder
In
the
R
evie
w Offic
er s
vi
ew,
t
is clea
r f
rom
th
e
S
tipul
ation
a
nd
Orde
r that
the
veto
a
uthor
ity
of
the
Re
vie
w Off
icer
incl
udes remo
vin
g
Dist
rict C
ounc
il
(inc
ludi
ng loca
l
u
nion
)
offi
cers
fr
om off
ice whe
n
t
hey ha
ve a
cted in
a
w
ay that
the
Re
vie
w Of
ficer
fin
ds to
vi
olate
th
e
stric
tures
of p
aragr
aph 5.
b. S
ee
Wa
lsh D
ecla
rati
on at
4.
Th
is is b
orne
of
a
num
ber
of
provi
sion
s wi
thin
the Stipu
lati
on an
d
Orde
rit s
el f begi
nnin
g wit
h th
e nume
rou
s wher
eas
cl
auses
at
pages
1
th
roug
h
3.
Se
e
id.at
.
T
hose
clau
ses se
t fo
rth
the rel
evant
his
tory
of
he
Dis
tric
t C
ounc
ilf
rom
the
t
ime
of ntr
y o
fhe
C
ons
ent
D
ecre
e i
n
1
994,
n
clud
ing t
he app
oint
ment
o
fInde
pend
ent
Inv
estig
ators
in De
cemb
er200
2 an
dA
ugus
t 20
05
wi t
h t
he
po
wer
toi
nvest
igate
wr
ongd
oing
. See
St
ipul
ation
and
O
rder
at 1.
A
ddit
iona
l claus
es r
ecou
nt
th
at de
spit
e
th
e
presence
of an
Independent
Investigator
with
the
noted
powe
r,
p
erson
s
eng
aged
in
crim
inal
a
cts
re
latin
gt
o t
he
Di
stric
t
Cou
nciland
ts
Bene
fit
F
unds
,
ulmi
nati
ng
in the
A
ugus
t 2009
i
ndict
ment
of
he
high
est elec
ted offici
al o
fhe
Distr
ict C
ounc
il
an
d
a trus
tee
of
ts
Be
nefit
Fun
ds, n
amel
y
E
xecu
tive
S
ecret
ary-
Trea
surer
M
ich
ael
For
de,
as w
ella
s oth
ers
inv
olve
d wi
th
the D
istri
ct
C
ounci
l
a
nd
Fu
nds,
or
va
rious
ac
ts
of
a
cket
eerin
g.
Se
e
id.at
2; e
e
alsoWa
lsh
D
ecla
ratio
n
a
t
2.
o
addr
essthi
s
co
ntin
uing
co
rrup
tion,
the
St
ipula
tionan
dOr
der
a
ppoi
nteda
Revi
ew
Off
icer,
exp
licit
ly
st
ating
t
hat
t was
pro
vidi
ng t
he
Re
view
Off
icer w
ith
gr
eate
r pow
er
than
that
affor
ded to
the
prev
ious
court
-app
oint
edoffic
er: th
e
pres
ence
an
d
acti
vity
of
an
inde
pend
ent
co
urt
-
appo
inte
d offi
cer grant
ed
p
ower
sbe
yon
d
thos
e pro
vide
d to
the
In
depe
nden
t
I
nvest
igat
or
in
8/11/2019 Response to Berman
5/9
M
intz
,
ev i
n,
Cohn
, erri
s,Glovs
kyand
Pop
eo,
.C.
Aug
ust2
5,
2014
Pa
ge 5
th
e Decem
ber
200
2 Stipu
latio
n
an
dOr
der an
d
th
e
Aug
ust
20
05
Or d
er, as set
for
th below
,are
essential
to theeradication
of
corruption
and
racketeering
as
they
affect
union
carpenters
and
un
ion emp
loyer
s. Se
eS
tipul
ationand
O
rder
at
3; see
als
oWal
sh Dec
larat
ion
a
t
.
T
he fi
rs t sp
ecific
po
werse
t
fo
rth
belo
w t
hesewher
eas
cla
usesand
the app
ointm
ent of
D
ennis
Wal
sh as
the Revie
wOf
ficer
was
th
e
Rev
iew an
d
Over
sight
Author
ity.
s sp
ecifie
d by
par
agrap
h
5.b,
the
R
O
may
revie
w
an
d
v
eto per
sons curr
ently
h
oldin
g
of
fice
oremp
loyme
nt
w
henhe
d
eterm
ines the
re has
been
an ac
tof
racke
teerin
g,asso
ciatio
n
witha
barr
ed per
son,
violat
ion
of law
or
a Cou
rt
or
der in
the
ca
se, b
reach
o
f
f
iduci
ary
du
ty or c
onduc
t
inc
onsist
ent
w
ith th
e Stip
ulatio
n
an
d
Ord
er.
See
S
tipula
tion and
Ord
er at TT
5.b.
i(3) a
nd 5 b
iii;
se
e al
so
W
alsh
Decla
ratio
n
at
4. Not
ably,
th
e
R
eview
O
ffice
r s au
thori
ty
wi
th respe
ct to
Dist
rict
Co
uncil
office
rs and e
mplo
yees
dif
fers
fromhis a
uthori
ty w
ith
resp
ect to
Be
nefit
F
unds
' ru
stees
and
pers
onnel
. See
W
alsh
D
eclara
tion at
. Whil
e
th
e
Rev
iew
Offic
er was
gi
ven
the auth
ority
to
review
and
veto
District
Council
officers
and
employees,
he
was
given
the
authority
to
review
an
d
prov
ide
writ
ten
notic
e of
fin
dings
to
the
Benef
itFunds
r
egard
ing
Fun
ds'
trus
tees and
pers
onnel,
pre
sumab
ly s
ot
hat
the F
unds
coul
d
t
ake a
ction
it
deem
ed m
erite
d. Comp
are
Sti
pulati
on a
nd
O
rder
at
5.b.
i(3) a
nd 5 b
iii
with
.b.ii(
3)
and
5 b iii
;
see
also
Wal
sh
decl
aratio
n
at an
d
5.
Thi
s
di
stinc
tion
is additi
onal
p
roof
wit
hin the f
our
corn
ers
of the
Sti
pulati
on a
nd
O
rder
regard
ing th
e
s
eparat
e
an
d
dist
inct auth
ority
of
he
Revi
ew
O
ffice
r
to
veto
or
r
emov
efrom
off
ice
Distr
ict Cou
ncil
off
icials
vio
lating
p
aragr
aph 5.b.
Apart
f
rom
the
p
lain
l
angua
ge o
f para
graph
5.b
,
it
is
impor
tant to
note t
hat
the
Rev
iew
and
Over
sight
Aut
horit
y set
for
th
there
in
is st
ructur
ally and con
ceptu
ally disti
nctf
rom
the
Discip
linar
y
Au
thori
ty set
fort
h in
pa r
agrap
h
5.
f as
well
as
the
a
uthori
ty
to
deter
mine
w
hethe
r
8/11/2019 Response to Berman
6/9
Mintz
, ev
in,
Cohn
, err
is,Glov
sky
and
Pop
eo,
.C.
Aug
ust
25,20
14
P
age
mem
bers
are
qualif
ied t
o
r
un f
or
elect
ive of
fice un
der
pa
ragra
ph
5.
k). Se
e
Wal
sh Dec
larat
ion at
6.
The
language
of
paragraph
5.f further
de monstrates
that
separate
and
distinct
Reviewand
Ov e
rsigh
t
Au
thori
tyand
Disc
iplin
ary
Auth
ority
were
given
to
the
Re
view
Offi
cer. Pu
rsuan
t to
parag
raph 5
.f, th
e Dist
rict Cou
ncil wa
s
requi
red to s
ubmi
t
t
o
the Rev
iew
Offic
er fo
r
appr
oval
prop
osed
pr oc
edure
s to disc
ipline
of
ficers
,
em
ploy
ees,
age
nts,repres
entat
ives
and
me
mbers
o
f
the Di
strict
Counc
il for
mis
condu
ct
incl
udingv
iolat
ion
of eder
al, state
or
locallaw
;un
ion
rules
,
byla
ws o
r consti
tutio
nalpr
ovisi
ons;
the
Co
nsent
Decr
ee o
r othe
r co
urt orde
r; o
r
an
y ac
tion
furthe
ring
or
t
hreate
ning
to
fu
rther
the in
fluenc
e of
rgani
zed c
rime.
A
lso
unde
r this p
aragr
aph,
t
heRev
iew Offi
cerreta
ins
the
cont
inuin
g abilit
y
to
asse
ss t
he p
rocedu
res.
s he
Cour
ti
s awa
re,
the m
ost
recent
Dis
trict
C
ounci
l of
ew
York
and
Vicini
ty
Trial
Pro
cedur
es ( T
rial
Proce
dures
)
wentinto
effe
cti
n
A
ugust
2
013.
See
E
xhibi
t
15
to
the Seve
nth In
terim
Repo
rt
of
the
Revi
ew Office
r dat
ed De
cemb
er 3
,
2
013.
2.
Extrinsic
Evidence
of
he
Parties' Intent
Nonet
heless
, t
he
S
econd
Ci
rcuit
has fou
nd am
bigui
ty w
ith res
pectto
the ve
to
au
thorit
y.
The
Circ
uit
stated
th
at
wh
ile it ac
knowl
edge[
s]
th
e
gover
nment
h
as adva
nced
w
hat
may
b
e
a
va
lid ar
gumen
t
th
at
the
R
Ooul
d
vet
o
an ind
ividu
al's
ap
point
mentt
o orc
ontin
uation
inD
istric
t
Counc
il of
fice],
based
ona
readi
ng
of
he
text
of
t
he
Sti
pulati
on we
also
c
annot
f
oreclo
se
the
pos
sibili
ty
th
at
t
heplai
ntiffs
inte
rpret
ation
[
that
the
RO c
ould
veto
o
nly action
sand
had t
o
rem
ove t
hem un
der the
disci
plinar
y
autho
rity]
is
corre
ct. S
umma
ryOrd
er at
7.
t is
in thi
s
con
nectio
n that
th
e
Ci
rcuit s
tated
that
ex
trinsi
c
e
viden
ce
may
be
cons
idere
d
to
ascer
tain
the
p
arties
'
inte
nt, i
nclud
ing t
hecircu
mstanc
es s
urrou
nding
the
form
ation
of he de
cree.'
Id. a
t 7-
8
8/11/2019 Response to Berman
7/9
Mintz,
evin,
Co
hn, er
ris,Glovs
kyand
Po
peo,
.C
.
Aug
ust 25
,2014
Page
(quo
ting
U.S.
v Bro
ad.
Music,
Inc
., 275
F.
3d168
, 17
5
(2d
Ci
r. 2001)
interna
l
quota
tion
marks
omitted)).
From
the mont
hs prec
eding his
ap
pointm
ent through
t
he
pr
esent,
t
here h
ave bee
n
a
nu
mber
of
examp
les ofextrin
sic
evi
dence
of the
part
ies inten
t wi
th respe
ct to
the
Stipul
ation
and
Ord
er as
a
w
hole an
d
t
o pa
ragrap
h 5.b in
pa
rticula
r.
First in
terms
of
back
ground
a
nd
cont
ext
reques
ted by
the Cour
t,
the
Review
Off
icerwas
pr
esent at
time
s w
ith the
partie
s
du
ring
the
p
eriod in
whic
hthe Stipu
lation
was
be
ing drafte
d. S
ee Wa
lsh Dec
larati
on
at
.
It was
the
RO s
under
standi
ng fr
om these
m
eeting
s
that
an
im
petus
to
the
June
2010
St
ipulati
on and
Orde
r
was
he
indi
ctment o
f ndividu
als
involv
ed wit
h
the Dis
trict Co
uncil,
nclud
ing its hi
ghest
ele
cted
official
then
Execu
tive
Secre
tary-T
reasure
r
Fo
rde.
See
id.
It
was
al
so his
unde
rstand
ingthat
t
hegover
nment s
oughtto
provid
e
expa
nded
a
uthorit
y to
th
e
Cour
t-app
ointed
office
r, in
cluding
the
ability
to v
eto
Distric
tC
ouncil
of
ficers
and
em
ployee
s, i
n o
rder
to eli
minate ong
oing
corruption.
See
id.
The
District
Council
ultimately
agreed
to
this
authority, stated
in
paragraph
5
.b. See
id. The
Be
nefit
Funds
did not
, and
the revi
ew a
nd
writ
ten
notice
langu
age flag
ged
above
was
thusi
ncluded
in
paragr
aph
5.
b. iii
with
r
espect t
o th
e Fund
s
tru
stees
and
personn
el.
See
id.
F
ollowi
ng his
appoin
tment in Ju
ne
201
0,
the R
eview Offi
cer ha
s exer
cised his
ve
to
author
ity wi
th
respect
to Di
strict Cou
ncil
inclu
ding
loc
al uni
on) ff
icers o
nnu
merous
occas
ions.
Heirst
e
xercise
d his veto
aut
hority
shortly
into h
is
tenure,
wi
th
the vetoes
o
f
Willo
ughby,
Ho
lt
and Da
ly. Se
e Docke
t
N
o.
1022
C
ourt s Dec
ision
an
d
Or
der);
see a
lso Un
ited States
v Dist
rict
Cou
ncil
et
a
l. 2010
U.S.
Dist
. L XIS
137
163 (S
.D.N.Y
. Dece
mber21,
2
010). The R
ast
exercis
ed
that
author
ity
in
May
2013
wi t
h
r
espect
t
o th
en Exec
utive Se
cretary
-Treasu
rer Mi
chael
8/11/2019 Response to Berman
8/9
Mintz
,
evin
,
Cohn, e
rris,Glo
vskyand
Popeo
,
.
C.
Au
gust25,
2014
P
age
Bilello.
See Dock
et No.
136
2Court
s Ord
er). s
he
Co
urt
is
a
ware,
h
e
ind
ividual
s subj
ect
to
those
vetoes,
and
a number
of
vetoes
in the intervening period including the
ones
at issue here,
sough
t to
overtu
rn the
RO
's
vetoes.
The
R
eview
Offic
er is
not a
ware of
the par
ties to
the
St
ipulati
on
and
Orde
r
the gov
ernmen
t and
the
Distr
ict Counc
il) ver
object
ing to
the exerci
se
of
his veto
po
wer
to
remo
ve
of
ficehol
ders.
See W
alsh D
eclarat
ion
at
. During
F
rank
Spence
r s
tenure as UB
C
upervis
or
f
or
the Dis
trict Co
uncil,
the
RO
w
ouldf
orward
Notic
es of
Vet
o to Mr
.
S
pencer
, never
recei
ving an
object
ion to
th
e
exerc
ise
of
he
vet
o autho
rity.
See
id
By
w
ay o
f
ex
ample,
in
April
2011
wh
en
the
Rev
iew
Off
icer
veto
ed Lawren
ce
D Erri
co as t
he Distr
ict
Counc
il sD
irector
of pera
tions,
Mr.
S
pencer
did not o
bject(nor
did
Loca
l
157)
. See
Exhibi
t
t
o
th
e Secon
d Interim
Repo
rt
of
he
Rev
iew Off
icer
dat
ed
June
3,
2011.
In
th
e
Bilel
lo mat
ter,
the
go
vernme
nt
spec
ifically
wr
ote to
expres
s
ts c
oncurr
ence
w
ith
the
R
O's
acti
on. S
ee Docke
t
No
.
136
2
(
Court
s
Dec
ision
a
nd
O
rder u
pholdi
ng RO's
veto of Bilel
lo
quotes
g
overnm
ent's
tt r
stating
that
t
is
of
the
view
that the
Review
Officerproperlyexercised
his
authority to veto
Mic
hael Bile
llo's
te
nure a
sthe
Di
strict
Cou
ncil
Execu
tive Secre
tary
-Tr
easurer
);
see also
Wals
h
D
eclarat
ion
at
. This
histo
ry of
ac
ceptan
ce of
he
RO
's ex
ercise
o
fhe v
eto
autho
rity
und
er
parag
raph
5.b
of
he
Stipu
lation
and
Order
plain
ly confir
ms
the par
ties' inten
t that
the
RO
oul
d
exerc
ise his aut
hority
under
5.
b
t
o veto off
icials
by
remov
ing
t
hem
fro
m office.
See
id
Ext
rinsic
eviden
ce
of
he
disti
nction
betwe
en
the Revie
w and
Over
sight
Autho
rity and
the
Disci
plinary
Auth
ority
inc
ludes
theTrial Proc
edures
refe
rred to
above.
A
ccordi
ng
to th
e
Tri
al
Proced
ures,
and as
cl
ear f
rom the
ir ope
ration in prac
tice,
cha
rges for
the
miscon
duct
spec
ifiedin
par
agraph
5.
f are
lodge
d by
a m
ember
again
st
anothe
r
me
mber
or b
y the
Distric
t
C
ouncil'
s
I
nspecto
r
Gene
ral (
IG )ag
ainst a
me
mber;
the ROhas
utili
zed
this
proc
ess on only a
fe
w
8/11/2019 Response to Berman
9/9
Min
tz
e
vin
,
Co
hn
e
rris
,Gl
ovs
kya
nd
Po
peo
.
C.
A
ugu
st
25 2
014
P
ag
e
9
o
cca
sio
ns
inwh
ich
hewa
s
s
eek
ing
toha
ve
r
an
k and
f
il e m
em
be
rs an
d
a
bus
ine
ss re
pre
sen
tat
ive
fined
and bannedfrom
theunion.
See
id.
at
7.
Discipline
under
the
Trial Procedu res
is
pr
ima
ril
y
de
sig
ned
a
s an
ong
oi
ng
o
uti
niz
ed
int
ra-
uni
on
pro
ces
s t
o ad
jud
ica
te
c
har
ges
b
y
uni
on
m
em
ber
s
or
th
e un
io
n s
I
G a
gai
nst
u
ni
on
me
mb
ers
. Se
e
T
ria
l
Pro
ced
ure
s
a
nd
Wal
sh
De
cla
rat
ion
at
.
t
i
squi
te
dif
fer
ent
tha
n t
he ve
toau
tho
rit
y
e
mpl
oy
ed by
the
R
evi
ew
Of
fic
er
whe
n i
n h
isd
isc
ret
ion,
con
du
ct
by
an
el
ect
ed
off
ice
r
r
equ
ire
sh
is
re
mov
al.
C
om
par
e
Tri
al
Pr
oce
dur
es
wit
h
S
tip
ula
tio
n an
d
Ord
er
at.b
; s
ee W
als
h
De
cla
rat
ion
a
t
.
Res
pec
tfu
lly
sub
mi
tte
d,
B
rid
get
M
o
hde
E
ncl
osu
re
cc:
A
US
As
en
jam
in
To
rra
nce
a
nd
Ta
ra
LaM
or
te
J
am
es M
ur
phy
sq.
Bar
bar
a S.
Jo
nes
,
E
sq.
R
ay
mo
nd
M
cG
uir
e E
sq.
Patr
ick
Ne
e
Le
vy
M
ess
ine
tti