Upload
ethan-nelson
View
218
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Restoration Ecology and the Conservation of Biodiversity
Basic principles of ecology have practical use for solutions
to human problems
NRES 420 Restoration Ecology
Objectives
• Human transformation of landscape created need
• Illinois – a state in great need• Restoration ecology & conservation
biology• Blending science into practice• Important ecological principles for
restoration• Practice of restoration
1999Executive Order 13112
(invasive species)
1836Steel plow invented
1800 1840 1880 200019601920
1862Homestead Act
1870’sAdvent of clay drainage tile systemsDecreased rail transportation costs
Legislation to create drainage districts
1869 Transcontinental railroad
1893First gasoline automobile
1903First flight
1923First commercial hybrid
maize
1956Interstate Highway
System
1970sEnvironmental protection legislation
1850Swamp & Overflowed Lands Act
Landscape Transformation
1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980
Year
0
4.8
6.4
8.0
1.6
3.2
Hectares (millions) in Illinois
Pasture
Forests
Wet Prairie / MarshDry Prairie
1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980
EarlySettlement
Start ofAgriculture
PrairieDrainage
DiversifiedFarming Monoculture
Otter
Bobcat
Beaver
Deer
Gray Wolf
Fisher
Mountain Lion
Black Bear
Bison
Elk
Coyote
CHANGES IN MAJOR LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS IN ILLINOIS SINCE 1800 AND IMPACTS ON SELECTED MAMMALS
Fragmentation
0-0.5 0.5-2 8-204-82-4 20-40 >40
Prairie Size (ha)
Nu
mb
er o
f S
ites
0
40
80
120
NUMBER OF HIGH QUALITY PRAIRIES REMAINING IN ILLINOIS CLASSIFIED BY SIZE CATEGORY
Number of Parcels
>240
40-240
20-40
0.4-4
<0.4
4-20
1,000 1,000,00010,000 100,000100
Are
a C
ateg
ory
(h
a)
FOREST PARCELS BY AREA CATEGORY
Habitat Lss
Invasive Species
Non-Natives in the Illinois Flora*
*2004: 961 non-native of 3,074 taxa 97 of 173 families (56%) lack non-
native taxa
1846 20041950 1986
20
10
0
30
% o
f Il
lin
ois
Flo
ra
Spread of Alliaria petiolata
Illinois in Need
• Clearly a need – – Remaining habitat:
• 0.01% prairie• 9.9% wetland• 31.4% forest
– U.S. Rank:• Indiana 48• Illinois 49• Iowa 50
Restoration Ecology
Using research to better understand ecological processes
within highly disturbed ecosystems in order to enhance their complexity and long-term
persistence
LANDSCAPEECOLOGY
ECOSYSTEMECOLOGY
POPULATIONECOLOGY
COMMUNITYECOLOGY
RESTORATION ECOLOGY
van Diggelen, Grootjans & Harris (2001)
Improving the Ecology of a Disturbed Area by:
– increase diversity in highly disturbed system – reintroduce ecosystem function – reestablish characteristic species and
community structure/function
– may have to start restoration from scratch
Ecosystem What are the goals of function restoration?
A. D. Bradshaw, “Reclamation of Land and Ecology of Ecosystems”
Ecosystemstructure
Restoration Ecology
Applying ecological principles within a social context to revitalize habitats and conserve species
ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION
LANDSCAPEECOLOGY
ECOSYSTEMECOLOGY
POPULATIONECOLOGY
COMMUNITYECOLOGY
POLICY
SOCIETY
ECONOMICS
POLITICS
Ecology Theory Relevant to Restoration• Population Ecology
– Vulnerability of small populations• Genetic depression, swamping• Metapopulation theory + MVP size
• Community Ecology• Species-area relationships
– Island biogeography theory– Problems with fragmented habitats
• Intermediate disturbance hypothesis• Succession & community assembly• Diversity-stability theory; community structure• Landscape Ecology• Ecosystem Ecology
What aspects of Population Ecology are relevant to Restoration Ecology?
• Species survival depends on • maintaining minimum viable population levels
(>500).• maintaining genetic diversity.• using locally adapted genotypes.• having a metapopulation structure with strong
source subpopulations to rescue sink ones.
COMMUNITY ECOLOGY: How is the Species-Area curve relevant?
S = c + z log Alog S = log c + z log A
S = c Az
Figure 1
How is Island Biogeography Theoryrelevant?
Near
Far
LargeSmall
Immigration
Number of Species
Rat
e (s
peci
es p
er y
ear)
Extinction
Figure 2
(From Forman, 1995)
Patch relationships: What is take-home message?
Figure 3
(D.T. Krohne, ‘General Ecology’)
Ecological Disturbance: What are its dimensions? How relate to restoration?
12
3
Figure 4
Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis:at which level does disturbance aidrestoration?
Disturbance Rate
Smallspecies
pool
Num
ber
of S
peci
es
Competitive exclusion
Figure 5
** Entries in italics connote reversible disturbances; others represent long-term or permanent conversion of habitat.
Selected Natural & Anthropogenic Disturbances: reversible vs. permanent change?• Natural Events**
– Fire– Disease epidemic– Flood– Herbivory– Drought– Hurricane, tornado, windstorm
– Avalanche, landslide– Volcanic eruption– Ice storm
• Anthropogenic Events**– Residential development– Road, trail, railroad line– Telephone line, electrical
power line– Dam, water diversion, canal– Commercial development – Modern agriculture – Mining– Logging – Grazing
Succession• an orderly change in relative abundances of
dominant species in a community following a disturbance until a stable community (‘climax’- like predisturbance) results
1° succession begins on mineral soils 2° succession begins on soils with seeds
Succession: Species-Species Interactions How do these interactions influence community
development?– Facilitation – early species make environment less
suitable for themselves, but more suitable for later species -- nurse crops
- Tolerance - early species make environment less suitable for recruitment of similar early species, but they neither help nor hinder later species
- Inhibition - early species make environment inhospitable to later-arriving species
Early prairie reconstructions overly dominated by warm season grasses
Community Assembly• development of the ecological community• is determined by random variation in
species' colonization of a disturbed area & subsequent species interactions
Which orientation to follow?Succession vs. Community Assembly
• Succession– Deterministic– Internal interactions & environment determine
outcome
• Assembly– Stochastic– Supply of propagules determines outcome– Multiple stable assemblies
How can succession be managed to aid restoration?
General causes Contributing processes Modifying factors
Site availability Disturbance Size, severity, time, dispersion
Species availability Dispersal Landscape configuration, dispersal agents
Propagules Land use, time since last disturbance
Resources Soil, topography, site history
Species performance
Ecophysiology Germination requirements, assimilation rates, growth rates, genetic differentiation
Life history Allocation, reproductive timing & mode
Stress Climate, site history, prior occupants
Competition Competition, herbivory, resource availability
Allelopathy Soil chemistry, microbes, neighboring species
Herbivory Climate, predators, plant defenses & vigor, community patchiness
Restoration: Managing Succession
ManagingSuccession
Designed Disturbance
Controlled SpeciesPerformance
ControlledColonization
Managing Succession: in PracticeDesigned Disturbance Controlled Colonization Controlled Species Performance
Burning Burning Burning
Bulldozing, Scraping, Topsoil Mixing
Broadcast seeding, Drill seeding, Direct planting Cabling
Cabling Cutting Grazing, Excluding grazers
Chopping, Clipping Grazing Fertilization, Reducing soil fertility
Flooding & draining Fertilization, Herbicide spraying Herbicide application
Herbicide application Irrigation, Water level change Mowing, Selective cutting
Plowing Topsoiling & live soiling Irrigation, Water level change
Solarization (thermal shock) Rotovating
Soil compaction Scraping
Soil fabrics
How can community structure influence stability of restored community?
• Top-down control of trophic abundances
• Cascade effects: indirect effects extended
through multiple levels
• Can have chain of extinctions if highly
dependent
• Keystone organisms must be preserved
• Non-redundant species, key species
that maintain stability/diversity
How can Diversity Complexity Stability be enhanced?
• An increase in the structural diversity of
vegetation increases species diversity.
• Full restoration of native plant communities
sustains diverse wildlife populations.
• A high diversity of plant species assures a
year-round food supply for the greatest
diversity of wildlife
Landscape Ecology• How does the landscape context of the restoration
influence everything discussed earlier?
Spatial Principles• Large areas sustain more species than small areas. • Many small patches in an area will help sustain regional diversity.• Patch shape is as important as size.• Fragmentation of habitats, communities, and ecosystems reduces diversity.• Isolated patches sustain fewer species than closely associated patches.• Species diversity in patches connected by corridors > than for disconnected patches.• A heterogeneous mosaic of community types sustains more species & is more likely to support rare species than a single homogeneous community.• Ecotones between natural communities support a variety of species from both communities & species specific to the ecotone.
Largest patch size
Patch longevity
Disturbance frequency
Habitat requirements
Minimum Dynamic Area in Restoration Design
Ecosystem Ecology: how is it relevant?
Interactions between the biotic
& abiotic components of the
ecosystem